You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
DiagnosticsDiagnostics
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

20 January 2026

Clinical Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction Model for Cardiac Arrest in General Ward-Admitted Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
3
VUNO, Seoul 06541, Republic of Korea
4
Critical Care Support Part, Department of Hospital Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea
This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics

Abstract

Background: Ward patients who experience clinical deterioration are at high risk of mortality. Conventional rapid response systems (RRS) using track-and-trigger protocols have not consistently demonstrated improved outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based cardiac arrest prediction model. Methods: This 1-year, prospective, non-randomized interventional trial assigned hospitalized patients with AI-based software as a medical device (AI-SaMD) high-risk alerts to groups based on their subsequent clinical response; those reassessed or treated within 24 h comprised the AI-SaMD-guided cohort, while the remainder formed the usual care cohort. Alerts prompted an optional but not mandatory treatment review. The primary outcome was ward-based cardiac arrest; the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Of 35,627 general ward admissions, 2906 triggered an AI-SaMD alert. Among these, 1409 (48.4%) were allocated to the AI-SaMD-guided cohort. The incidence of cardiac arrest significantly decreased from 2.07% to 1.06% (adjusted risk ratio (RR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20–0.88; p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality also significantly declined (adjusted RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.32–0.98; p < 0.05). Conclusions: AI-SaMD-guided alerts were associated with reductions in cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality without requiring additional resources, supporting their integration into current clinical workflows to improve patient safety and optimize RRS performance.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.