Next Article in Journal
BC2NetRF: Breast Cancer Classification from Mammogram Images Using Enhanced Deep Learning Features and Equilibrium-Jaya Controlled Regula Falsi-Based Features Selection
Previous Article in Journal
Liver Ultrasound Elastography in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A State-of-the-Art Summary
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/diagnostics13071237
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative MR Neurography in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

by
Olivia Foesleitner
1,
Karl Christian Knop
2,
Matthias Lindenau
2,
Fabian Preisner
1,
Philipp Bäumer
1,3,
Sabine Heiland
1,
Martin Bendszus
1 and
Moritz Kronlage
1,*
1
Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2
Neurologie Neuer Wall Dr. Bredow & Partner, Neuer Wall 19, 20354 Hamburg, Germany
3
dia.log, Altoetting Center for Radiology, 84503 Altoetting, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(7), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071237
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 19 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the phenotype of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in quantitative MR neurography. Methods: In this prospective study, 22 patients with ALS, 8 patients with MMN, and 10 healthy volunteers were examined with 3T MR neurography, using a high-resolution fat-saturated T2-weighted sequence, diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI), and a multi-echo T2-relaxometry sequence. The quantitative biomarkers fractional anisotropy (FA), radial and axial diffusivity (RD, AD), mean diffusivity (MD), cross-sectional area (CSA), T2-relaxation time, and proton spin density (PSD) were measured in the tibial nerve at the thigh and calf, and in the median, radial, and ulnar nerves at the mid-upper arm. Results: MMN showed a characteristic imaging pattern of decreased FA (p = 0.018), increased RD (p = 0.014), increased CSA (p < 0.001), increased T2-relaxation time (p < 0.001), and increased PSD (p = 0.025) in the upper arm nerves compared to ALS and controls. ALS patients did not differ from controls in any imaging marker, nor were there any group differences in the tibial nerve (p > 0.05). Conclusions: MMN shows a characteristic pattern of quantitative DTI and T2-relaxometry parameters in the upper-arm nerves, primarily indicating demyelination. Peripheral nerve changes in ALS seem to be below the detection level of current state-of-the-art quantitative MR neurography.

1. Introduction

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a peripheral nerve disorder causing steadily progressive motor weakness in middle-aged patients, leading to high individual disability. The pathophysiology is not yet fully understood and presumably involves an immune-mediated dysfunction at the nodes of Ranvier. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) is effective in 70–90%, but only if given in a timely manner, as untreated disease duration is the strongest predictor of worse outcome [1,2,3,4]. Definite diagnosis, however, may be difficult due to overlapping clinical symptoms, especially with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which implies a fatal diagnosis and completely different treatment strategy. Furthermore, most patients with MMN need IVIG maintenance therapy to prevent or slow down further motor weakness, and this necessitates a tailored treatment plan [5].
Previous imaging studies have shown good diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of MMN and ALS based on the increased cross-sectional area (CSA) in the nerve ultrasound or nerve swelling, T2-hyperintensity, and comparison with the muscular denervation pattern in MR neurography [6,7,8]. However, CSA and T2-signal behavior provide only gross structural information and cannot assess microstructural changes occurring during disease progression [4,9,10].
Advanced MR methods could help to overcome this limitation. Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and T2-relaxometry allow us to quantitatively assess nerve fiber integrity, as shown in various inflammatory and genetic/neurodegenerative neuropathies [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Moreover, DTI-derived parameters may potentially distinguish between axonal and myelin damage and detect remyelination [17]. Hence, quantitative MR sequences may provide non-invasive biomarkers for treatment monitoring and a better understanding of the pathophysiology throughout the course of the disease. So far, quantitative imaging studies in MMN and ALS are scarce and showed divergent results [18,19,20,21]. In particular, the characteristic phenotype of MMN and ALS, as depicted by quantitative MR neurography biomarkers, is still unclear.
The aim of this study was to characterize peripheral nerve changes and, thus, the underlying pathophysiology, as reflected by quantitative MR neurography (DTI, T2-relaxometry, and conventional nerve CSA) in patients with MMN and ALS compared to each other and to a group of healthy controls.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patients with ALS or MMN were part of a previous investigation [6] and prospectively recruited from one neurologic center and were examined by a neurologist specialized in peripheral nerve disorders with more than 25 years of experience. Inclusion criteria were an age between 20 and 80 years, a diagnosis of ALS (clinically definite or probable according to the Awaji criteria [22]), or of MMN (clinically definite or probable according to the criteria formulated by the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society criteria [23]). The clinical diagnosis was made while blinded to the MR neurography results. Additionally, healthy volunteers were recruited by public announcement. Exclusion criteria were any known neurologic or systemic disease except for ALS or MMN in patients and general contraindications for MRI. Demographic information was recorded for every participant, as well as detailed clinical/neurological characteristics and electrophysiological findings of patients, as described before and summarized in Appendix B Table A1 [6].

2.2. MR Neurography

All participants were examined on the same 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Magnetom Skyra; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), using a 15-channel transmit/receive array coil (QED, Mayfield Village, OH, USA). The imaging protocol covered the mid-upper arm, the mid-thigh, and the proximal calf each, with three axial sequences acquired: (i) a high-resolution fat-saturated T2-weighted sequence for anatomical nerve delineation, (ii) a multi-spin-echo fat-saturated T2-relaxometry sequence, and (iii) a multi-shot echo planar imaging DTI sequence. Detailed sequence parameters are presented in Table 1. The lower extremity was examined in the supine position, while for the upper extremity, a prone position was taken, with the arm extended above the head. Patients were examined on the clinically more affected side. Five ALS patients did not tolerate positioning for the upper-arm examination.

2.3. Image Postprocessing

Image analysis was conducted in OsiriX MD version 12.5 (Pixmeo Sarl, Bernex, Switzerland). Due to variable intraneural connective tissue, only the tibial portion of the sciatic nerve was included, similar to previous MR neurography studies [24,25,26]. The tibial, median, radial, and ulnar nerves were manually segmented on six central, representative slices of the T2-weighted sequence to ensure comparability across subjects, and the cross-sectional area was measured. Regions of interest (ROI) were then transferred to the corresponding T2-relaxometry images and corrected for distortion and motion on the image with the highest echo time (120 ms). Mean signal intensities of the even echoes were then extracted, and an exponential function was fitted to receive the parameters of apparent T2-relaxation time (T2app) and protons spin density (PSD), as described previously [25,27]:
S T E = P S D ∗ e - T E T 2 a p p + o f f s e t
Similarly, ROIs were transferred from the T2-weighted sequences to the b0-images of DTI and corrected for distortion. Maps of the scalar DTI parameters of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) were obtained using the plugin “DTI map” in OsiriX, with a fixed noise threshold of 10 arbitrary units (A.U.), referring to the signal intensity in the b0 image. This threshold was defined based on visual inspection of DTI-parameter maps with different noise thresholds (range 0–20). The mean nerve signal that was measured in the b0 image in six randomly selected participants was 74.2 A.U. (SD 14.8 A.U.), clearly exceeding the noise threshold. Subsequently, DTI parameters were extracted from the maps for all participants, and the mean values of six representative slices per slab were used for further analyses. In all, 6 out of the overall acquired 115 slabs were excluded after visual inspection due to relevant artifacts, of which 5 were at the calf (1 healthy subject, 2 ALS patients, and 2 MMN patients), and 1 was at the upper arm (healthy subject).
Due to the demographic differences between healthy participants and patients, we used multiple linear regression models to adjust the imaging parameters of the control cohort to 60 years of age and to a body weight of 70 kg to match patients based on previous publications [24,25]. Formulae are given in Appendix A.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 28 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction was used to assess group differences between patients with ALS or MMN and the healthy controls. For the statistical analysis, the values of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves were averaged. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. The results are given as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) unless indicated otherwise.

3. Results

In total, 22 patients with ALS (male/female 12/10), 8 patients with MMN (male/female 7/1), and 10 healthy subjects (male/female 0/10) were included. The mean age was 62.3 years (SD 9.0) in ALS, 57.6 years (SD 18.6) in MMN, and 46.2 years (SD 13.4) in healthy volunteers (p = 0.007). The mean body weight was 69.5 kg (SD 11.9) in the ALS group, 78.9 kg (SD 11.2) in the MMN group, and 60.6 kg (SD 7.9) in the control group (p = 0.005).
The mean symptom duration prior to MRI was 20 months in ALS (SD 14, range 2–49 months) and 70 months in MMN (SD 55, range 13–188 months). Lower motor neuron signs in at least one arm were present in 22/22 patients with ALS and 7/8 patients with MMN, while at least one leg was affected in 22/22 patients with ALS and 3/8 patients with MMN. Individual clinical/neurological characteristics are listed in Appendix B Table A1.
Figure 1 shows representative images and parameter maps of a healthy subject and patients with ALS or MMN. In the upper-arm nerves, patients with MMN showed a decreased FA compared to healthy subjects (0.48 ± 0.08 versus 0.56 ± 0.06; p = 0.018; Figure 2). This decrease in FA was due to an increase in RD (1188 ± 233 × 10−6 mm2/s versus 914 ± 149 × 10−6 mm2/s; p = 0.014), while AD was not statistically different. The nerve CSA of patients with MMN was higher compared to that of both the ALS and healthy controls (9.00 ± 4.74 mm2 versus 5.12 ± 0.79 mm2 and 4.46 ± 0.78 mm2; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Moreover, the T2app in patients with MMN was higher compared to both patients with ALS and to the healthy volunteers (84.6 ± 18.2 ms versus 68.1 ± 6.5 ms and 65.8 ± 6.5 ms; p = 0.002 each). The PSD was higher in patients with MMN compared to the control group (324 ± 54 versus 261 ± 39; p = 0.029) but not to ALS (p = 0.263).
There were no significant differences between ALS patients and healthy subjects in any comparison either at the upper or lower extremity. Neither were there any significant differences in the tibial nerve at the thigh or calf between MMN, ALS, or the control group in any quantitative MR neurography biomarker (p > 0.05 each; Figure 3 and Appendix B Figure A1). Values are listed in Appendix B Table A2.

4. Discussion

In this study, we assessed the phenotype of MMN and ALS in quantitative MR neurography, using DTI, T2-relaxometry, and conventional nerve CSA. We detected characteristic changes in DTI and T2-relaxometry parameters in the upper-arm nerves of patients with MMN compared to ALS or healthy controls. In contrast, MR neurography biomarkers in ALS patients were not different from healthy subjects.
In MMN patients, we predominantly found changes of DTI parameters in the upper-arm nerves rather than in the tibial nerve, corresponding to the main site of clinical affection. A decrease in FA is generally interpreted as a correlate of structural neuropathy and may be caused by an increase of RD or a decrease of AD or both [28]. In our cohort of MMN patients, this decrease of FA was caused by an increase of RD, which is considered as a marker of demyelination [17] and which was found likewise in both acquired and hereditary demyelinating polyneuropathies, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) or Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) type 1 [16,29]. Our findings of a DTI phenotype indicating demyelination are of interest since the pathophysiology of MMN is not yet fully understood. After an initial description as a demyelinating neuropathy, there is also evidence of axonal degeneration and affection of the nodes of Ranvier and the paranodal area [10,30,31,32,33,34]. A decrease of the DTI parameter AD is discussed as a potential marker for axonal neuropathy; however, the evidence for this simple conception is weaker than an increase of RD reflecting demyelination [17]. One reason for this might be that AD may also be modulated by endoneurial edema, and different stages of axonal damage might therefore potentially lead to different phenotypes in DTI imaging [35].
In the MMN patients of our cohort, AD was not decreased compared to both healthy volunteers and patients with ALS, while a previous study using DTI-based tractography of the median and ulnar nerves did find a significant, yet small decrease in AD in MMN patients [18]. This discrepancy may be explained by methodological differences or different stages of disease, although the median duration of symptoms (52 months versus 59 months in our cohort) and IVIG treatment (10/10 versus 6/8 in our cohort) were similar. Another study measuring DTI metrics in cervical roots did not find any significant changes in MMN compared to healthy controls [20], suggesting that peripheral nerves may be more representative regions for MMN affection than plexus fibers. This is also in line with a study of Beecher et al., who reported no hypertrophies in the brachial and lumbosacral plexus of MMN patients [36].
MMN was also characterized by an increase in T2app and PSD, which further hints at demyelination and endoneurial edema. As a quantitative measure of water content, T2-relaxometry detects tissue changes in density and macromolecular composition. Increased T2 relaxation time is a consistent finding in multiple sclerosis as a typically demyelinating disease [37,38] but was also found in amyloidosis, which is accompanied by nerve swelling, while neurodegenerative neuropathies with purely axonal damage showed decreased T2app and PSD [11,12,13,14]. The combination we report also fits well with the consistent finding of fascicular nerve swelling in MMN described by conventional MRI and nerve ultrasound [6,7,8].
In contrast to MMN, ALS is a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by a loss of axons and myelinated fibers and signs of acute degeneration [39]. Importantly, patients with ALS did not show any differences in imaging parameters of the tibial nerve or the upper-arm nerves in our study. This is in line with two previous investigations of DTI in ALS [18,20] and with the visual assessment based on conventional T2-weighted sequences [6]. Simon et al., on the contrary, reported a significant decrease in FA and AD of the tibial nerve in ALS compared to healthy subjects, which further decreased within 3–6 months of follow-up [19]. Moreover, Lichtenstein et al. reported lower FA values in the sciatic nerves of patients with ALS in comparison with healthy volunteers [21]. However, absolute differences of DTI values were small in both studies, and age differences between patients and healthy controls of 6–8 years might also have contributed to these differences to some extent. Taken together, nerve changes in ALS seem rather subtle or below the level of detection by most currently applied MR neurography sequences.
Limitations of this study are the small number of participants, particularly concerning the group of patients with MMN due to the rarity of the disease. Consequently, it was not possible to further investigate the influence of clinical characteristics, such as disease duration or treatment effects. Similarly, correlations of clinical and electrophysiological findings were beyond the scope of this study but will be examined in subsequent investigations. Due to the heterogenous pattern of affection of upper-arm nerves in patients, we decided on a conservative approach and averaged the imaging measures of the three major arm nerves, which could have decreased the sensitivity of the analysis. Although T2-relaxometry and DTI sequences were shown to be highly reliable and robust [40,41,42], absolute values of quantitative imaging biomarkers may be influenced by a variety of technical parameters and cannot be easily generalized. However, this does not affect the relative differences between the groups that we report, as hardware and sequence parameters were identical in all participants. Care was taken to positioning of the coils and selection of central slices to ensure reproducibility. However, effects due to diffusion gradient inhomogeneity cannot be fully ruled out [43,44,45]. Spectral fat saturation may lead to inhomogeneous fat suppression. Differences in age or weight between groups might affect quantitative MR neurography parameters [24,25,46,47]. In order to control for the younger age and lower body weight of our control group, we used correction formulae based on multiple linear regression, which represents a conservative approach, since this correction rather prevents false-positive results.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study indicates a characteristic pattern of quantitative DTI and T2-relaxometry parameters in the upper-arm nerves of patients with MMN, which should be further investigated as biomarkers of early diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Quantitative MR neurography parameters in patients with ALS were not different from healthy controls, implying that nerve pathology in ALS might take place below the detection level of current state-of-the-art quantitative MR neurography.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization K.C.K., M.L., P.B., M.B. and M.K.; methodology, O.F., F.P., P.B. and M.K.; software, O.F. and F.P.; validation, K.C.K., M.L., P.B., S.H., M.B. and M.K.; formal analysis, O.F., S.H. and M.K.; investigation K.C.K., M.L. and M.K.; resources, M.B.; data curation, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, O.F. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, all; visualization, O.F., F.P. and M.K.; supervision, K.C.K., M.L., P.B., S.H., M.B. and M.K.; project administration, P.B. and M.K.; funding acquisition, O.F., F.P., S.H., M.B. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

SH (SFB 1118) and MB (SFB 1158) were supported by the German Research Foundation. FP and OF were supported by a Physician-Scientist Fellowship of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg. OF received a research grant from the Rahel Goitein-Straus Support Program of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg (S-398/2012, 20/03/2013; latest amendement 17/12/2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions, as they contain information that could compromise the privacy of the research participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

This section offers the formulae for the correction of imaging parameters in healthy controls based on previous investigations [24,25]. T2 relaxation time and mean diffusivity were not corrected for demographic variables due to the lack of significant correlations.

Appendix A.1. Fractional Anisotropy (FA)

The individual FA ( F A m e a s u r e d ) was adjusted to an age of 60 years and a body weight of 70 kg according to the following:
F A = F A m e a s u r e d - 60   y e a r s - a g e × 0.0026 y e a r s - 70   k g - w e i g h t × 0.0012 k g

Appendix A.2. Radial Diffusivity (RD)

The individual RD ( R D m e a s u r e d ) was adjusted to an age of 60 years according to the following:
R D [ 10 - 6 m m 2 / s ] = R D m e a s u r e d + 60   y e a r s - a g e × 3.326 y e a r s

Appendix A.3. Axial Diffusivity (AD)

The individual AD ( A D m e a s u r e d ) was adjusted to an age of 60 years according to the following:
A D [ 10 - 6 m m 2 / s ] = A D m e a s u r e d − 60   y e a r s - a g e × 4.044 y e a r s

Appendix A.4. Proton Spin Density (PSD)

The individual PSD ( P S D m e a s u r e d ) was adjusted to a body weight of 70 kg according to the following:
P S D [ a . u . ] = P S D m e a s u r e d − 70   k g - w e i g h t × 1.087 k g

Appendix A.5. Cross-Sectional Area (CSA)

The individual CSA ( C S A m e a s u r e d ) was adjusted to a body weight of 70 kg according to the following:
C S A [ m m 2 ] = C S A m e a s u r e d + 70   k g - w e i g h t × 0.045 k g

Appendix B

Diagnostics 13 01237 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the tibial nerve at the proximal calf. One-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction, statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Figure A1. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the tibial nerve at the proximal calf. One-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction, statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Diagnostics 13 01237 g0a1
Table
Table A1. Individual clinical/neurological characteristics of patients.
Table A1. Individual clinical/neurological characteristics of patients.
IDDiagnosisSexAge (Years)Body Height (cm)Body Weight (kg)Symptom Onset before MRI (Months)Site of First SymptomsUpper Motor Neuron SignsRight ArmLeft ArmRight LegLeft LegUpper ExtremityLower ExtremityALSFRS
1definite ALSmale561807447right armyesyesyesyesyes-right12
2definite ALSmale581709319bulbaryesyesyesyesyesleftleft31
3definite ALSmale481726531right legyesyesyesyesyes-right9
4definite ALSmale671788527left legyesyesyesyesyesrightright32
5definite ALSmale561786049right legyesyesyesyesyes-right25
6definite ALSfemale68160639left legyesyesyesyesyesleftleft33
7definite ALSfemale731636439bulbaryesyesyesyesyesleftleft20
8definite ALSfemale52166652left legyesyesyesyesyesleftleft27
9definite ALSmale42174763left armyesyesyesyesyesleftleft31
10definite ALSfemale601695731right legyesyesyesyesyesrightright27
11definite ALSfemale771596026right legyesyesyesyesyesrightright20
12definite ALSmale63179757right legyesyesyesyesyes-right27
13definite ALSfemale64175506bulbaryesnoyesyesyesleftleft32
14definite ALSfemale551556311right legyesyesyesyesyesrightright29
15definite ALSfemale55176628left legyesyesyesyesyesleftright30
16probable ALSmale741859035right armyesyesyesyesyesrightright38
17probable ALSmale601757713right legyesyesyesyesyesrightright27
18definite ALSmale731788021right legyesyesyesyesyesrightright33
19definite ALSfemale631745217left legyesyesyesyesyesleftleft34
20probable ALSmale68177725both armsyesyesyesyesyesrightright39
21probable ALSfemale701696215bulbaryesyesnoyesnorightright36
22probable ALSmale691858411bulbaryesyesyesyesyesleftleft20
23probable MMNmale301827215left legnoyesyesyesyesrightright40
24definite MMNmale7618289188right armnoyesyesyesnorightright40
25definite MMNmale351988460right armnononoyesyesrightright40
26definite MMNmale591757559right armnoyesnononorightright40
27definite MMNmale601746513right armnoyesnononorightright40
28definite MMNfemale781606557right armnoyesnononorightright38
29definite MMNmale481878798right armnoyesnononorightright40
30definite MMNmale7517294110left armnonoyesnonoleftleft38
Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; MMN, multifocal motor neuropathy; ALSFRS, ALS functional rating scale.
Table
Table A2. Parameters of DTI, T2 relaxometry, and CSA per nerve and region. Values are mean (SD).
Table A2. Parameters of DTI, T2 relaxometry, and CSA per nerve and region. Values are mean (SD).
LocationNerveFAAD (10−3 mm2/s)RD (10−3 mm2/s)MD (10−3 mm2/s)
ControlsALSMMNControlsALSMMNControlsALSMMNControlsALSMMN
Upper armMedian0.60 (0.07)0.58 (0.06)0.50 (0.10)2508.9 (177.5)2577.9 (242.2)2528.7 (126.7)860.1 (169.0)992.5 (169.1)1152.2 (225.6)1397.7 (138.6)1521.0 (188.7)1611.0 (174.1)
Radial0.54 (0.06)0.51 (0.07)0.47 (0.11)2649.2 (301.5)2554.1 (283.8)2679.5 (139.7)1012.0 (169.1)1116.2 (306.7)1242.0 (268.2)1545.7 (193.3)1593.4 (290.7)1721.2 (207.1)
Ulnar0.55 (0.09)0.53 (0.06)0.47 (0.06)2329.4 (185.9)2605.2 (202.2)2420.2 (480.4)875.2 (201.9)1110.7 (193.6)1170.9 (273.3)1347.6 (167.8)1608.9 (193.6)1587.3 (359.5)
Upper armMean0.56 (0.06)0.54 (0.04)0.48 (0.07)2503.5 (168.6)2583.6 (195.9)2542.8 (221.1)913.6 (149.3)1075.8 (173.9)1188.3 (215.6)1431.5 (132.9)1577.7 (179.7)1639.8 (214.1)
ThighSciatic0.55 (0.09)0.54 (0.06)0.51 (0.08)2190.4 (297.0)2053.1 (275.1)2103.5 (347.1)852.0 (229.3)846.1 (207.3)936.3 (329.3)1286.2 (226.0)1248.4 (226.0)1325.4 (353.8)
CalfTibial0.40 (0.05)0.47 (0.06)0.42 (0.06)2348.8 (157.3)2274.1 (291.2)2383.0 (133.7)1211.7 (74.4)1112.4 (241.8)1235.0 (200.2)1574.7 (68.1)1495.5 (252.0)1617.7 (191.1)
LocationNerveT2app (ms)PSD (a.u.)CSA (mm2)
controlsALSMMNcontrolsALSMMNcontrolsALSMMN
Upper armMedian63.9 (8.0)64.4 (7.4)85.0 (21.2)301.4 (44.8)3330.8 (63.2)354.0 (50.9)6.68 (1.05)7.82 (1.52)11.79 (6.09)
Radial69.3 (5.9)71.2 (6.5)86.8 (21.9)169.6 (21.4)214.7 (31.9)237.1 (52.5)2.80 (0.75)3.04 (0.75)7.61 (6.83)
Ulnar64.2 (11.4)68.6 (12.0)82.1 (18.4)324.9 (55.8)354.8 (74.8)380.9 (107.3)3.93 (1.12)4.50 (0.73)7.58 (5.04)
Upper armMean65.8 (6.5)68.1 (6.5)84.6 (18.2)260.6 (39.0)300.1 (46.3)324.0 (49.7)4.46 (0.78)5.12 (0.77)9.00 (4.39)
ThighSciatic76.8 (4.3)72.7 (4.7)83.4 (21.8)173.7 (30.4)174.4 (30.5)193.5 (65.9)17.0 (4.24)17.8 (4.21)23.1 (7.82)
CalfTibial67.9 (8.9)68.1 (8.1)72.9 (9.8)198.3 (22.7)206.7 (36.4)196.6 (49.3)7.70 (0.69)8.24 (2.83)9.68 (3.24)
Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; MMN, multifocal motor neuropathy; FA, fractional anisotropy; AD, axial diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; MD, mean diffusivity; T2app, apparent T2 relaxation time; PSD, proton spin density; CSA, cross-sectional area.

References

  1. Cats, E.A.; van der Pol, W.L.; Piepers, S.; Franssen, H.; Jacobs, B.C.; van den Berg-Vos, R.M.; Kuks, J.B.; van Doorn, P.A.; van Engelen, B.G.; Verschuuren, J.J.; et al. Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. Neurology 2010, 75, 818–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Slee, M.; Selvan, A.; Donaghy, M. Multifocal motor neuropathy: The diagnostic spectrum and response to treatment. Neurology 2007, 69, 1680–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Léger, J.M.; Viala, K.; Cancalon, F.; Maisonobe, T.; Gruwez, B.; Waegemans, T.; Bouche, P. Intravenous immunoglobulin as short- and long-term therapy of multifocal motor neuropathy: A retrospective study of response to IVIg and of its predictive criteria in 40 patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van Asseldonk, J.T.; Van den Berg, L.H.; Kalmijn, S.; Van den Berg-Vos, R.M.; Polman, C.H.; Wokke, J.H.; Franssen, H. Axon loss is an important determinant of weakness in multifocal motor neuropathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006, 77, 743–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Vlam, L.; van den Berg, L.H.; Cats, E.A.; Piepers, S.; van der Pol, W.L. Immune pathogenesis and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. J. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 33 (Suppl. 1), S38–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kronlage, M.; Knop, K.C.; Schwarz, D.; Godel, T.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Baumer, P. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis versus Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: Utility of MR Neurography. Radiology 2019, 292, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rattay, T.W.; Winter, N.; Décard, B.F.; Dammeier, N.M.; Härtig, F.; Ceanga, M.; Axer, H.; Grimm, A. Nerve ultrasound as follow-up tool in treated multifocal motor neuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol. 2017, 24, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Loewenbruck, K.F.; Werner, R.; Gunther, R.; Dittrich, M.; Klingenberger, R.; Reichmann, H.; Storch, A.; Hermann, A. One nerve suffices: A clinically guided nerve ultrasound protocol for the differentiation of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). J. Neurol. 2021, 268, 1495–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tracy, J.A.; Taylor, B.V.; Kiernan, M.; Dyck, P.J.; Crum, B.A.; Mauermann, M.L.; Amrami, K.K.; Spinner, R.J.; Dyck, P.J.B. Nerve Pathology Distinguishes Focal Motor Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy From Multifocal Motor Neuropathy. J. Clin. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2020, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taylor, B.V.; Dyck, P.J.; Engelstad, J.; Gruener, G.; Grant, I.; Dyck, P.J. Multifocal motor neuropathy: Pathologic alterations at the site of conduction block. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2004, 63, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kollmer, J.; Hund, E.; Hornung, B.; Hegenbart, U.; Schonland, S.O.; Kimmich, C.; Kristen, A.V.; Purrucker, J.; Rocken, C.; Heiland, S.; et al. In vivo detection of nerve injury in familial amyloid polyneuropathy by magnetic resonance neurography. Brain 2015, 138 Pt 3, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kollmer, J.; Hilgenfeld, T.; Ziegler, A.; Saffari, A.; Sam, G.; Hayes, J.M.; Pietsch, A.; Jost, M.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; et al. Quantitative MR neurography biomarkers in 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy. Neurology 2019, 93, e653–e664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kollmer, J.; Weiler, M.; Purrucker, J.; Heiland, S.; Schonland, S.O.; Hund, E.; Kimmich, C.; Hayes, J.M.; Hilgenfeld, T.; Pham, M.; et al. MR neurography biomarkers to characterize peripheral neuropathy in AL amyloidosis. Neurology 2018, 91, e625–e634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pham, M.; Oikonomou, D.; Hornung, B.; Weiler, M.; Heiland, S.; Baumer, P.; Kollmer, J.; Nawroth, P.P.; Bendszus, M. Magnetic resonance neurography detects diabetic neuropathy early and with Proximal Predominance. Ann. Neurol. 2015, 78, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Breckwoldt, M.O.; Stock, C.; Xia, A.; Heckel, A.; Bendszus, M.; Pham, M.; Heiland, S.; Baumer, P. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Adds Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Neurography. Investig. Radiol. 2015, 50, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kronlage, M.; Pitarokoili, K.; Schwarz, D.; Godel, T.; Heiland, S.; Yoon, M.S.; Bendszus, M.; Baumer, P. Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation With Electrophysiology. Investig. Radiol. 2017, 52, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aung, W.Y.; Mar, S.; Benzinger, T.L. Diffusion tensor MRI as a biomarker in axonal and myelin damage. Imaging Med. 2013, 5, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Haakma, W.; Jongbloed, B.A.; Froeling, M.; Goedee, H.S.; Bos, C.; Leemans, A.; van den Berg, L.H.; Hendrikse, J.; van der Pol, W.L. MRI shows thickening and altered diffusion in the median and ulnar nerves in multifocal motor neuropathy. Eur. Radiol. 2017, 27, 2216–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Simon, N.G.; Lagopoulos, J.; Paling, S.; Pfluger, C.; Park, S.B.; Howells, J.; Gallagher, T.; Kliot, M.; Henderson, R.D.; Vucic, S.; et al. Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging as a measure of disease progression in ALS. J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. van Rosmalen, M.H.J.; Goedee, H.S.; Derks, R.; Asselman, F.L.; Verhamme, C.; de Luca, A.; Hendrikse, J.; van der Pol, W.L.; Froeling, M. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus shows specific changes in nerve architecture in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy and motor neuron disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 2716–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lichtenstein, T.; Sprenger, A.; Weiss, K.; Grosse Hokamp, N.; Maintz, D.; Schlamann, M.; Fink, G.R.; Lehmann, H.C.; Henning, T.D. MRI DTI and PDFF as Biomarkers for Lower Motor Neuron Degeneration in ALS. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 682126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. de Carvalho, M.; Dengler, R.; Eisen, A.; England, J.D.; Kaji, R.; Kimura, J.; Mills, K.; Mitsumoto, H.; Nodera, H.; Shefner, J.; et al. Electrodiagnostic criteria for diagnosis of ALS. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society—First revision. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2010, 15, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kronlage, M.; Schwehr, V.; Schwarz, D.; Godel, T.; Uhlmann, L.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Baumer, P. Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging (DTI): Normal values and demographic determinants in a cohort of 60 healthy individuals. Eur. Radiol. 2018, 28, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kronlage, M.; Schwehr, V.; Schwarz, D.; Godel, T.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Baumer, P. Magnetic Resonance Neurography: Normal Values and Demographic Determinants of Nerve Caliber and T2 Relaxometry in 60 healthy individuals. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2019, 29, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Franco, C.D. Connective tissues associated with peripheral nerves. Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2012, 37, 363–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Milford, D.; Rosbach, N.; Bendszus, M.; Heiland, S. Mono-Exponential Fitting in T2-Relaxometry: Relevance of Offset and First Echo. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mori, S.; Zhang, J. Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 2006, 51, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, H.S.; Yoon, Y.C.; Choi, B.O.; Jin, W.; Cha, J.G.; Kim, J.H. Diffusion tensor imaging of the sciatic nerve in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type I patients: A prospective case-control study. Eur. Radiol. 2019, 29, 3241–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yeh, W.Z.; Dyck, P.J.; van den Berg, L.H.; Kiernan, M.C.; Taylor, B.V. Multifocal motor neuropathy: Controversies and priorities. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2020, 91, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kieseier, B.C.; Mathey, E.K.; Sommer, C.; Hartung, H.P. Immune-mediated neuropathies. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Auer, R.N.; Bell, R.B.; Lee, M.A. Neuropathy with onion bulb formations and pure motor manifestations. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1989, 16, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaji, R.; Oka, N.; Tsuji, T.; Mezaki, T.; Nishio, T.; Akiguchi, I.; Kimura, J. Pathological findings at the site of conduction block in multifocal motor neuropathy. Ann. Neurol. 1993, 33, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Corbo, M.; Abouzahr, M.K.; Latov, N.; Iannaccone, S.; Quattrini, A.; Nemni, R.; Canal, N.; Hays, A.P. Motor nerve biopsy studies in motor neuropathy and motor neuron disease. Muscle Nerve 1997, 20, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, M.; He, H.; Schifitto, G.; Zhong, J. Simulation of changes in diffusion related to different pathologies at cellular level after traumatic brain injury. Magn. Reson. Med. 2016, 76, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Beecher, G.; Howe, B.M.; Shelly, S.; Staff, N.P.; Mauermann, M.L.; Taylor, B.V.; Spinner, R.J.; Tracy, J.A.; Dyck, P.J.B.; Klein, C.J. Plexus MRI helps distinguish the immune-mediated neuropathies MADSAM and MMN. J. Neuroimmunol. 2022, 371, 577953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mottershead, J.P.; Schmierer, K.; Clemence, M.; Thornton, J.S.; Scaravilli, F.; Barker, G.J.; Tofts, P.S.; Newcombe, J.; Cuzner, M.L.; Ordidge, R.J.; et al. High field MRI correlates of myelin content and axonal density in multiple sclerosis—A post-mortem study of the spinal cord. J. Neurol. 2003, 250, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tardif, C.L.; Bedell, B.J.; Eskildsen, S.F.; Collins, D.L.; Pike, G.B. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cortical multiple sclerosis pathology. Mult. Scler. Int. 2012, 2012, 742018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Riva, N.; Clarelli, F.; Domi, T.; Cerri, F.; Gallia, F.; Trimarco, A.; Brambilla, P.; Lunetta, C.; Lazzerini, A.; Lauria, G.; et al. Unraveling gene expression profiles in peripheral motor nerve from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: Insights into pathogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Preisner, F.; Baumer, P.; Wehrstein, M.; Friedmann-Bette, B.; Hackbusch, M.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Kronlage, M. Peripheral Nerve Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Interreader and Test-retest Reliability as Quantified by the Standard Error of Measurement. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2020, 30, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Preisner, F.; Behnisch, R.; Foesleitner, O.; Schwarz, D.; Wehrstein, M.; Meredig, H.; Friedmann-Bette, B.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Kronlage, M. Reliability and reproducibility of sciatic nerve magnetization transfer imaging and T2 relaxometry. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 9120–9130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Poncelet, A.; Weiler, M.; Hegenbart, U.; Sam, G.; Schonland, S.; Purrucker, J.C.; Hayes, J.M.; Hund, E.; Bendszus, M.; Heiland, S.; et al. Dual-Echo Turbo Spin Echo and 12-Echo Multi Spin Echo Sequences as Equivalent Techniques for Obtaining T2-Relaxometry Data: Application in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis as a Surrogate Disease. Investig. Radiol. 2022, 57, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Krzyzak, A.T.; Klodowski, K. The b matrix calculation using the anisotropic phantoms for DWI and DTI experiments. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, 25–29 August 2015; Volume 2015, pp. 418–421. [Google Scholar]
  44. Borkowski, K.; Krzyzak, A.T. Assessment of the systematic errors caused by diffusion gradient inhomogeneity in DTI-computer simulations. NMR Biomed. 2019, 32, e4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Borkowski, K.; Klodowski, K.; Figiel, H.; Krzyzak, A.T. A theoretical validation of the B-matrix spatial distribution approach to diffusion tensor imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017, 36, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hofstadler, B.; Baumer, P.; Schwarz, D.; Kronlage, M.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Godel, T. MR Neurography: Normative Values in Correlation to Demographic Determinants in Children and Adolescents. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2020, 30, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fosleitner, O.; Schwehr, V.; Godel, T.; Preisner, F.; Baumer, P.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Kronlage, M. Magnetization Transfer Ratio of Peripheral Nerve and Skeletal Muscle: Correlation with Demographic Variables in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2021, 32, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 13 01237 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative images of a healthy subject and patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). From top to bottom, the rows show representative images of the T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence, the corresponding parameter map of fractional anisotropy (FA-map), and T2-map based on the T2-relaxometry sequence. Insets show a magnification of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves.
Figure 1. Representative images of a healthy subject and patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). From top to bottom, the rows show representative images of the T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence, the corresponding parameter map of fractional anisotropy (FA-map), and T2-map based on the T2-relaxometry sequence. Insets show a magnification of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves.
Diagnostics 13 01237 g001
Diagnostics 13 01237 g002 550
Figure 2. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the upper-arm nerves. Asterisks represent statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 from one-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Figure 2. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the upper-arm nerves. Asterisks represent statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 from one-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Diagnostics 13 01237 g002
Diagnostics 13 01237 g003 550
Figure 3. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the tibial nerve at the thigh. One-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction, statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Figure 3. Boxplots of DTI parameters (upper row), cross-sectional area (CSA), and T2-relaxometry metrics (lower row) measured in the tibial nerve at the thigh. One-way analysis of variance with Holm–Sidak’s correction, statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The plots illustrate the 25–75th percentiles (boxes) and minimum-to-maximum values (whiskers). Ns, not significant.
Diagnostics 13 01237 g003
Table
Table 1. Sequence parameters.
Table 1. Sequence parameters.
DTIT2-RelaxometryT2w
Repetition time (TR)3990 ms2400 ms8150 ms
Echo time (TE)72 ms12 echoes (10, 20, …, 120 ms)54 ms
Field of view (FOV)178 × 178 mm2160 × 160 mm2160 × 160 mm2
Matrix102 × 128338 × 334512 × 333
Slice thickness3.0 mm3.5 mm3.5 mm
Number of slices181141
Slice gap0.3 mmNone0.35 mm
Number of averages112
Parallel imagingGRAPPANoneGRAPPA
Acceleration factor2n.a.2
Refocusing flip angle180°180°150°
Bandwidth930 Hz/px190 Hz/px181 Hz/px
Acquisition time per slab8:36 min6:43 min3:56 min
Fat saturationSpectral fat saturationSpectral fat saturationSpectral fat saturation
Number of diffusion directions20n.a.n.a.
b-values0 and 1000 s/mm2n.a.n.a.
Abbreviations: DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; T2w, T2-weighted sequence; GRAPPA, generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foesleitner, O.; Knop, K.C.; Lindenau, M.; Preisner, F.; Bäumer, P.; Heiland, S.; Bendszus, M.; Kronlage, M. Quantitative MR Neurography in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071237

AMA Style

Foesleitner O, Knop KC, Lindenau M, Preisner F, Bäumer P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Kronlage M. Quantitative MR Neurography in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(7):1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foesleitner, Olivia, Karl Christian Knop, Matthias Lindenau, Fabian Preisner, Philipp Bäumer, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, and Moritz Kronlage. 2023. "Quantitative MR Neurography in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" Diagnostics 13, no. 7: 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop