Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Premium Oil Soybean Variety Heinong 551 with Integrating Conventional Hybridization and Gamma Radiation
Previous Article in Journal
Idarucizumab Reversal in Subdural Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Carboxymethylcellulose Hyaluronan (SEPRAFİLM®) on an Arthrofibrosis Model Created in Rabbit Knees
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies

1
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Specialized Hospital, ul. Dekerta 1, 66-400 Gorzow, Poland
3
2nd Clinical Department of General and Gastroenterogical Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
4
Department of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2025, 15(10), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101615
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 12 October 2025 / Accepted: 15 October 2025 / Published: 16 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Postoperative Management of Patients After Surgery)

Abstract

Background: Massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) is a serious complication in complex spine surgeries such as deformity correction, multilevel fusion, tumor resection, and revision procedures. While no strict definition exists, blood loss exceeding 1500 mL or 20% of estimated blood volume is generally considered clinically significant. Excessive bleeding increases the risk of hemodynamic instability, transfusion-related complications, postoperative infection, and prolonged hospitalization. Methods: This narrative review summarizes the current understanding of the incidence, risk factors, anatomical vulnerabilities, and evidence-based strategies for managing IBL in spine surgery through comprehensive literature analysis of recent studies and clinical guidelines. Results: Key risk factors include patient characteristics (anemia, obesity, advanced age, medication use), surgical variables (multilevel instrumentation, revision status, operative time), and pathological conditions (hypervascular tumors, severe deformity). Perioperative medication management is critical, requiring discontinuation of NSAIDs (5–7 days), antiplatelet agents (5–7 days), and NOACs (48–72 h) preoperatively to minimize bleeding risk. The thoracolumbar junction and hypervascular spinal lesions are especially prone to bleeding due to dense vascular anatomy. Evidence-based management strategies include comprehensive preoperative optimization, intraoperative hemostatic techniques, antifibrinolytic agents, topical hemostatic products, cell salvage technology, and structured transfusion protocols. Conclusions: Effective management of massive IBL requires a multimodal approach combining preoperative risk assessment and medication optimization, intraoperative hemostatic strategies including tranexamic acid administration, advanced monitoring techniques, and coordinated transfusion protocols. Particular attention to perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications is essential for bleeding risk mitigation. Understanding patient-specific risk factors, surgical complexity, and anatomical considerations enables surgeons to implement targeted prevention and management strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing complications in high-risk spine surgery procedures.
Keywords: massive blood loss; spine surgery; tranexamic acid; anticoagulants; antiplatelets; hemostasis; transfusion; risk factors; NOACs; perioperative management massive blood loss; spine surgery; tranexamic acid; anticoagulants; antiplatelets; hemostasis; transfusion; risk factors; NOACs; perioperative management

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rybaczek, M.; Kowalski, P.; Mariak, Z.; Grabala, M.; Suszczyńska, J.; Łysoń, T.; Grabala, P. Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies. Life 2025, 15, 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101615

AMA Style

Rybaczek M, Kowalski P, Mariak Z, Grabala M, Suszczyńska J, Łysoń T, Grabala P. Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies. Life. 2025; 15(10):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101615

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rybaczek, Magdalena, Piotr Kowalski, Zenon Mariak, Michał Grabala, Joanna Suszczyńska, Tomasz Łysoń, and Paweł Grabala. 2025. "Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies" Life 15, no. 10: 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101615

APA Style

Rybaczek, M., Kowalski, P., Mariak, Z., Grabala, M., Suszczyńska, J., Łysoń, T., & Grabala, P. (2025). Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies. Life, 15(10), 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101615

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop