Next Article in Journal
Effects of Obesity on Medial Tibiofemoral Cartilage Mechanics in Females—An Exploration Using Musculoskeletal Simulation and Probabilistic Cartilage Failure Modelling
Previous Article in Journal
The In Silico Characterization of Monocotyledonous α-l-Arabinofuranosidases on the Example of Maize
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Infections of the Orofacial Region: Treatment, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology

1
Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1435916471, Iran
2
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1516745811, Iran
4
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1516745811, Iran
5
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz 6135715794, Iran
6
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
7
Department of Science and Research, Islimic Azade University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran
8
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
9
Periodontics and Oral Medicine Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020269
Submission received: 27 December 2022 / Revised: 7 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Undoubtedly, diagnosing and managing infections is one of the most challenging issues for orofacial clinicians. As a result of the diversity of symptoms, complicated behavior, and sometimes confusing nature of these conditions, it has become increasingly difficult to diagnose and treat them. It also highlights the need to gain a deeper insight into the orofacial microbiome as we try to improve our understanding of it. In addition to changes in patients’ lifestyles, such as changes in diet, smoking habits, sexual practices, immunosuppressive conditions, and occupational exposures, there have been changes in patients’ lifestyles that complicate the issue. Recent years have seen the development of new infection treatments due to the increased knowledge about the biology and physiology of infections. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the types of infections in the mouth, including the types that viruses, fungi, or bacteria may cause. It is important to note that we searched the published literature in the Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochran databases from 2010 to 2021 using the following keywords: “Orofacial/Oral Infections,” “Viral/Fungal/Bacterial Infections”, “Oral Microbiota” And “Oral Microflora” without limiting our search to languages and study designs. According to the evidence, the most common infections in the clinic include herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus, Candida albicans, Aspergillus, Actinomycosis, and Streptococcus mutans. The purpose of this study is to review the new findings on characteristics, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and new treatment for these types of infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

The natural flora of the mouth is very diverse. After the large intestine, it has the second highest complexity in terms of microorganisms, including more than 700 microorganisms [1]. The tongue is the primary source of microbes in saliva and the major oral site for microbial growth [2]. Some bacterial, viral, and fungal agents can affect the skin and mucous membranes in the orofacial area. These factors can cross natural barriers and cause lesions of varying degrees. Some of them can even be life-threatening. The local and systemic factors determining the microbiota and genetics, as well as the individual factors such as diet, teeth brushing habits, dentures, dental procedures, mouthwashes, medications, etc., can be involved in the occurrence of orofacial infections [1,3,4,5,6,7]. Oral infections can occur under certain conditions, such as poor oral hygiene, antibiotic consumption, trauma, and dry mouth, and can damage the oral cavity. These infections also may spread into the nearby tissues and turn into systemic infections. For example, chronic oral infections are known to be a risk factor for cardiac disease [2].
Each tissue has specific microbes that are different from adjacent tissues’ microbes. Still, these microbes can be displaced under certain conditions, such as the effects of cytotoxic drugs, oral cancer, or epithelial atrophy [8,9]. The oral flora is divided into two categories, static and transient, which regularly balance with the host and protect against pathogenic microorganisms. The static flora on oral cavity surfaces is known as biofilm that can improve or protect oral health against pathogens, increase the virulence of potentially harmful microorganisms, and reduce the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents [10,11,12]. Infections caused by bacteria in the mouth include caries and periodontitis [8]. Microorganisms can attack different parts of the mouth via different mechanisms. For example, keratinized epithelial surfaces, such as the palate, become excessively keratinized, and their contained opportunistic microorganisms may lead to infection. The buccal and labial mucosa, as non-keratinized epithelial surfaces, may be occupied by dead or apoptotic cells that may be attacked by bacteria [10,13,14,15]. Despite the progression of several local or generalized treatment methods, orofacial infections may still cause severe discomfort and pain. Therefore, the popularity of the clinical presentation of those infections is dominant to their diagnosis, clinical management, and appropriate referral. The following review includes the most recognized orofacial infective agents and their clinical characteristics.

2. Herpes Simplex Virus

Herpes simplex virus [16] is one of 200 species of the Herpesviridae family and belongs to the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae, the genus Simplexvirus. Despite differences in host and morphology, this family is thought to be originated from a common ancestor with tailed bacteriophages [17]. These viruses are about 120 to 200 nanometers in diameter. Structurally, they include a circled DNA containing a unique long (UL) segment and a unique short (US) segment (opposite repeats) [17,18]. In addition, they have an icosahedral symmetric capsid, protein coating, and a lipid bilayer cell-like envelope. Genome transcription and replication and the formation of new capsids occur in the host cell’s nucleus [18]. These viruses’ short reproductive cycle helps them rapidly destroy the host cells [17]. During the infection procedure, the envelope releases the capsid into the host cell’s cytoplasm after fusion with its plasma membrane. HSV can attack nerve tissue and multiply there (neuro-virulence). Eighty-three percent identical nucleotides and fifty percent homology in the sequence display a strong association between the two types of herpes virus: HSV-1 and 2 [17].
HSV is also recognized for its latency ability in trigeminal and sacral ganglion nuclei of the ganglia structures [17,19]. HSV fuses to the axon termini to establish latency and moves retrogradely along the sensory fibers (Figure 1) [17]. Then, it generates latency-associated transcripts (LATs) that enhance axon regeneration, reduce viral gene expression, and prevent nerve cell apoptosis [20].

2.1. Epidemiology

HSV is most commonly transmitted through asymptomatic shedding from an infected person’s mouth or genitals. It is mainly transmitted through proximity to an infected person in immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals [21]. Recurrent HSV infections occur in one-third of the world’s population. HSV-1 and 2 usually infect the mucocutaneous of the mouth and genitals, respectively. The incidence of HSV is 40–95% worldwide, depending on the socio-economic status of the studied population, with higher rates in lower socio-economic populations. Sixty percent of adults with HSV-2 have orolabial herpes [21]. Generally, the seroprevalence of HSV increases with age and shows some correlations to the country’s income. Sixty percent higher seroprevalence in people over the age of 40 than in those under 20 suggests an increased risk of exposure that should be observed by health beneficiaries [22].

2.2. Clinical Presentation

The disease has no clinical signs at the initial acquisition or during periods of reactivation. However, symptoms occur in the active periods of the disease, following asymptomatic periods, on a rotating basis [23]. Clinical symptoms of the first episode of the disease include headache, fever, muscle aches, and inflammation of the lymph nodes [23]. Then, classic lesions are created that include fluid-filled vesicles that become purulent and dry. Genital herpes includes small blisters resulting in benign ulcers, whereas, in cold sores, several small blisters are aggregated [23]. Other vital clinical signs of common gingivitis include bleeding gums with edema and friable erythematosus. In addition, sores on the buccal mucosa and gums may be yellow based on a red halo. These oral lesions are often associated with anorexia. Symptoms in young children can include drooling, halitosis, and dehydration [23]. Herpetic vitiligo is another manifestation, which is painful, erythematous, and swollen lesions often occur in the distal phalanx of the hand, caused by HSV-1 or HSV-2. This lesion mainly affects the fingers (thumb) and rarely the palm [23]. HSV-1 eczema herpeticum of Kaposi varicelliform eruption is caused by poor immunity due to atopic dermatitis, burns, or topical immunosuppressants. The disease includes vesicular skin lesions [24]. HSV eye keratitis and HSV encephalitis are other complications caused by this virus. Eye involvement can lead to sensitive retinal necrosis, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, or chorioretinitis. Reaching this viral infection to the brain parenchyma leads to extensive hemorrhagic necrosis and vascular occlusion. Encephalitis is the worst outcome that can occur in a healthy person following this infection [24,25]. Patients with good immunity have milder symptoms in the recurrence period than in the early symptoms. In general, patients with HSV-1 usually have lesions around the lips and mouth. Several studies have reported a local burning prodrome with roughness or itching before the vesicles erupt. The lymph nodes in the affected area can become sensitive and enlarged without systemic symptoms and fever. Studies have shown that HSV-1 and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is associated with invasive periodontal disease caused by bacteria [26].

2.3. Diagnosis

Because most people with HSV-2 do not have the classic clinical symptoms, genital herpes is more challenging to diagnose than oral herpes and can be confused with related diseases such as fungal infections, lichen planus, atopic dermatitis, and urinary tract diseases. Diagnosis is confirmed by laboratory tests, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), skin biopsy, immunofluorescence, and virus culture polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Blood and urine cultures determine previous and ongoing infections, respectively. PCR is more sensitive and accurate for diagnosing HSV in mucosal surfaces than vesicular fluid culture. In patients with a history of genital ulcers lacking active lesions, serological diagnostic tests are conducted [27].

2.4. Treatment

Although antiviral drugs, including acyclovir, valaciclovir, famciclovir, and penciclovir, reduce the disease’s incidence, duration, and severity, no way exists to remove the virus from the body. Painkillers and topical anesthetic treatments can relieve pain/fever and itching, respectively; however, their efficiency has been controversial [28]. In addition, intravenous infusion of acyclovir is recommended for eczema herpeticum to be limited and prevented from spreading to the eye [25]. Seizure control, fluids management, and intracranial pressure control will improve results in HSV-based eye keratitis [24,25]. Suppressive therapy, such as corticosteroids, is commonly used to improve pain and tenderness at the onset of symptoms. Oral acyclovir has a positive therapeutic effect on primary and recurrent HSV genital infections [25]. Some studies have discussed the antiviral activity of some essential oils on the HSV spp. (even acyclovir-resistant strains) through different mechanisms, such as inhibiting cell attachment. These studies also imply that the synergistic activity of the extracts and, thus, essential oils minimize the development of resistant virus strains [29,30]. A recent development in treating HSV is presented in Table 1.

3. Human Papilloma Viruses

Papillomaviruses have a wide genetic diversity. Human papillomavirus (HPV) viruses use human cellular proteins to reproduce and survive [52]. The virus genome consists of open reading frames [53] and long control regions (LCR) to regulate the replication and transcription of primary genes [54]. The main reservoir of HPV is inflamed gums, salivary gland epithelium, and cryptal epithelium of tonsils, oral border, and oropharynx. The most clinically important genus of HPV is the alpha genus of human papillomavirus [52]. In high-risk HPV, placing the virus genome in the host genome breaks the virus genome at the E1 and E2 sites, and losing E2, in turn, causes E6 and E7 to lose control that, inhibits the regular function of p53 and pRb, respectively, and interfere with the cell cycle [55].

3.1. Epidemiology

Owing to effective screening strategies, the incidence of HPV-caused cervical cancer has decreased; however, the oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) cases have kept rising. In addition, the prevalence of HPV DNA has increased by between 24–45 percent from 1990 to 2005 [56]. In a study in the US, oral HPV rates in men were around 60 percent higher than in women. Additionally, their study evidenced the HPV is the leading cause of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) in men, whereas smoking is the predominant cause in women [57].

3.2. Clinical Presentation

HPV infection can be transmitted from the mother’s cervix (sexual and non-sexual fomite transmission) and produces clinical or subclinical lesions. Oral HPV lesions include a range of benign oral lesions, lichen planus, fibroma, hyperplastic, papillomatous, verrucous, and carcinoma lesions. Generally, flat, exophytic, or wart-like white lesions in the oral mucosa, exophytic, wart-like, or papillary proliferations can be considered clinical manifestations of HPV [58]. Oral sex is the main transmission root in these diseases, and soft-circumscribed sessile nodular lesions and koilocytosis are some of their pathological and cellular manifestations [59]. The latent location of HPV in the mouth is usually in the gingival pocket because it is the only place where basal cells are in direct contact with the environment [60]. In about one-fourth of patients with periodontal disease in a clinical survey, the gingival samples have been associated with HPV [60]. Additionally, alveolar bone loss has been related to tumor-positive HPV [60,61].

3.3. Risk Factors

Risk factors for HPV infection include unsafe sexual behavior, smoking, periodontitis, and inflammation. These factors affect HPV infection by altering the oral environment. Cigarettes stimulate and suppress immune mechanisms in the mouth through the chemicals in tobacco. In women with oral HPV, the prevalence of HPV-infected cervixes is also higher, which may be a factor in increasing the risk of oral HPV [62].

3.4. Diagnosis

There are several diagnostic methods for HPV. Immunohistochemical analysis-specific antibodies (e.g., p16INK4A and p16 IHC) and HPV mRNA/DNA-detecting PCR are the sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic methods for HNSCC tumor specimens. However, studies have shown that mRNA tests are the best approach for confirming the diagnosis [63]. Serological biomarker tests cannot be used for detecting HPV infection in the oral cavity. Their examination in oral fluids is useful for identifying and examining the incidence and course of the disease as they are low-cost, non-invasive, and local-specific [64].

3.5. Treatment

Syrjänen discusses that HPV particles only get inactivated at temperatures 75–80 °C [62]. Preventive approaches such as vaccination and routine screening of HPV antibodies in the saliva are among the most effective ways to prevent HPV-associated head and neck diseases. Cold therapy, electrosurgery, surgical resection, laser therapy, and trichloroacetic acid are the usual treatments for papillomas/condyloma, verocroas, and FEH occurred by HPV [52]. The therapeutic developments in treating HPV infection are summarized in Table 1.

4. Candida albicans

More than 200 species of the genus Candida are usually non-pathogenic in humans. However, in immunocompromised individuals, Candida is the most frequent cause of oral mucosal infections, commonly due to antibiotics and the consequent change in the bacterial microbiota. In addition, suppressing the local or systemic immune system prepares the environment for infection. This group’s most common pathogen species is C. albicans, which accounts for more than 90% of oral lesions [65]. Morphological control between yeast and hyphae by C. albicans is involved in its pathogenesis. C. albicans co-adhesion with oral bacteria such as S. mutans helps it to colonize, persist, and grow by receiving a carbon supply. Vice versa, Candida reduces the bacteria’s oxygen stress, promotes better bacteria adhesion, and prepares stimulatory growth factors [66,67].

4.1. Epidemiology

The general prevalence of C. albicans is 20–75%, with 95% incidence in HIV patients, 90% in patients undergoing chemotherapy and acute leukemia, 88–65% in patients at long-term caring centers, 50–65% in people with detachable dentures, 45–30% in healthy adults, 65–45% in healthy children, and 45% in infants. In immunocompromised individuals, severe systemic exposure to Candida species increases mortality [68]. Oropharyngeal Candida is an opportunistic and recurrent fungal infection in more than 90% of patients with HIV [69]. The mortality rate of Candida bloodstream infection (candidemias) is more than 30% [68].

4.2. Clinical Presentation

Pseudomembranous, erythema, hyperplasticity, mucosal irritation, and edema are the symptoms of primary oral candidiasis [70,71]. In more severe cases, hemodynamic instability, positive blood cultures, fever, shock, and tachycardia may occur [70]. Pseudomembranous Candidiasis (thrush) is found on the white plaques, buccal mucosa, oropharynx, and junction of the hard and soft palate and is the most common form of candidiasis. Although some patients may experience a sour taste, burning sensation, and bleeding in the affected areas, most patients are asymptomatic [71]. Candidiasis may be hyperplastic or atrophic and occurs in either chronic or acute forms [70,72]. Different types of candidiasis can be asymptomatic or ulcerous [70]. Hyperplastic candidiasis resembles leukoplakia and may involve the labial commissures and become malignant [72]. Its chronic form is challenging to diagnose since the hyphae may hide in any rough surface in the oral cavity, such as papilloma, epithelial dysplasia, and squamous cell carcinoma [72]. Acute atrophic candidiasis is usually iatrogenic (such as antibiotic consumption) and especially common in HIV patients, whereas chronic atrophic candidiasis is iatrogenic mainly due to orthodontic retainers or dentures that do not adequately fit in place [70]. Chronic atrophic candidiasis and inflammatory papillary hyperplasia [73] may also accompany due to iatrogenic candidiasis because of taking biopsies from median rhomboid glossitis, smoking, and inhaled steroids, for instance [70]. Symptoms of esophageal candidiasis include ulceration, obstruction, narrowing of the esophagus, chest pain, nausea, and vomiting [70]. C. albicans, S. aureus, and β-hemolytic Streptococcus species are among the microorganisms present in angular cheilitis. The anterior region of the nostrils to the corners of the mouth is the source of staphylococci. Iron deficiency anemia, and vitamin B12 deficiency are among the etiological factors [74].

4.3. Risk Factors

IgA, mucins, and antifungal agents (e.g., histatin 5 and calprotectin) protect the oral environment from Candida infection. However, factors such as age, organ transplants, HIV, chemotherapy, poor oral hygiene, smoking, inhaled steroids, and radiotherapy increases its risk [75]. Then, in all patients with daily dental care, treatment of xerostomia, control of diabetes, restriction of corticosteroids and topical or systemic antibiotics, and elimination of underlying predisposing factors are very important [76]. The oral amount of Candida in HIV patients relates to their salivary flow [77]. The overgrowth of Candida species has no significant association with oral bacterial dysfunction [75].

4.4. Diagnosis

Candidiasis suspicion is based on examining mucosal changes, stained smears with Schiff’s reagent or KOH, and histopathological biopsies, searching for the hyphae or epithelial parakeratosis with polymorphonuclear leukocytes [78]. Transcribed internal distance sequencing [40] can be used to identify emerging candidate species and the historical course of candidiasis. For the rapid diagnosis of invasive candidiasis, serological biomarkers, including antibodies against mycelium, β-d-glucan (BDG), mannan antigen (Mannan-Ag), and mannan antibodies, are evaluated [79]. Endoscopy is also necessary for esophageal candidiasis suspicion patients [70].

4.5. Treatment

Polyenes and azoles are two types of antifungal drugs [80,81]. Polyenes (with conjugated double bonds) bind to sterols (mainly ergosterols) and change the cell membrane transfer temperature. Then, the leakage of monovalent ions (K+, Na+, H+, and Cl2) and small organic molecules lead to cell death [80]. On the other hand, azole stores α-methylase enosterol to prevent the lanosterol to ergosterol conversion. These topical drugs have no pharmacological systemic side effects since they have no systemic absorption. In cases where topical drugs do not respond, systemic drugs are used [81]. Studies have shown that probiotics may affect the toxicity of C. albicans. For example, Lactobacillus spp. and S. salivarius prevent the differentiation of C. albicans into hyphae or biofilm structure and decrease the salivary yeast level. Probiotics also increase the level of anti-Candida IgA and, consequently, the yeast level [82]. Recent developments for candida infection are shown in Table 2.

5. Aspergillus

Aspergillosis genus is the second most common opportunistic fungal infection in humans. Aspergillus fumigatus is an air-borne fungal pathogen causing many diseases [108,109]. This pathogen has a saprotrophic mycelial with an efficient spread through asexual spores and a life mostly on decaying organic matter secreting a wide range of enzymes (e.g., amylases, xylanases, pectinases, and elastase) [108]. However, some studies have evidence of heterothallism and a periodical sexual mating procedure [110]. All isolates of A. fumigatus are highly hydrophobic and fast-growing, but their virulence can vary based on indefinite factors such as the growth rate of isolates [109].
The main virulence factors of A. fumigatus are its cell wall containing polysaccharides (90%) and proteins and the glutotoxin from the epipolythiodioxopiperazines family [108]. Through the pathogenesis of Aspergilloma (noninvasive chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis), A. fumigatus hyphae form a biofilm in the extracellular matrix (ECM) with a different cell wall composition and structure [110].

5.1. Epidemiology

The epidemiological studies report that the prevalence of Aspergillus varies in a geographical-, regional-, seasonal-, and occupational-dependent manner [111]. Aspergillus spp. has been isolated from the respiratory tract of asymptomatic patients, and its DNA has been found in 37% of healthy individuals [112]. Its prevalence has been 30% in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 53% of patients with Aspergillus positive culture were conflicted with invasive Aspergillosis (IA) [112]. Distal–lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) is an onychomycosis condition due to Aspergillus spp., with a prevalence of up to 35% on average and 71% in the diabetic population. It also accounts for 18–50% of all nail diseases and 30% of fungal skin infections [111].

5.2. Clinical Presentation

Aspergillus colonization function damages the epithelial cells and upregulation of ECM proteins by disrupting the expression of the ZNF77 transcription factor in bronchial epithelium and causing conidial adhesion. The immune system-survived and metabolically activated conidia grow, germinate, form hyphae, spread by attacking blood vessels, and invade the lung tissue [113]. Aspergillosis is divided into three categories: invasive (nonfulminant and fulminant), noninvasive, and noninvasive destructive. The nonfulminant invasive types are slowly progressive, and the fulminant invasive types are very aggressive. The non-invasive type can be locally destructive but has no tissue invasion and includes Aspergilloma, fungal ball, and Mycetoma [78,114]. Headache, fever, nasal congestion, swelling of the face, purulent or bloody nasal discharge, nasal pain, and epitaxy are the clinical symptoms of A. rhinosinusitis. This diagnosis should be considered in people with regular sinusitis or who are resistant to antibiotics. Oral lesions associated with Aspergillosis and other systemic mycoses can be considered dispersed diseases of the lungs. Irregular oral lesions may indicate the spread of an adjacent structure, such as the maxillary sinus, or a significant infection of the oral mucosa [115]. In the first stage of Aspergillosis, marginal growth areas appear to contain degraded epithelium and infiltrate fungal hyphae in the connective tissue. In the next stage, the previous lesions change to necrotic gray lesions and spread by attachment to the gums by ulceration and pseudomembrane. Invasion of the arteries is found at the base of these wounds. In the last stage, progressive damage to the alveolar bone and muscles is characterized by histopathological evidence of the penetration of fungal hyphae around the face [116]. Poor outcomes were associated with cases of older age, bone marrow transplantation, high sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and mechanical ventilation [112].

5.3. Diagnosis

To diagnose Aspergilloma, chest radiographs are still a suitable imaging technique that shows a round solid body enclosed in a radiolucent crescent in the upper part of the lung (bilateral and multiple). Thin-section chest computed tomography (MDCT), multiple incision (MSCT), spiral computed tomography (CT), and high-resolution CT at the optimal dose are suitable methods for patients at risk of IA. In the early stages of IA analysis, CT lung angiography can show vascular occlusion at the level of a suspected fungal lesion [117]. Additionally, microscopic examination and culture should be performed in patients at risk for IA. Culture is not a specific and appropriate diagnostic marker, while sputum culture is positive for Aspergillus in half of the patients with Aspergilloma. In the microscopic examination, it is essential to prove tissue attack by hyphae. The sensitivity of microscopic examination for IA is about 50% [118]. Evaluation of anti-Aspergillus antibodies by immunoblots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods is available as a robust and inexpensive method which is the reference method for serological diagnosis of chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis (CPA) [119].

5.4. Treatment

The standard doses of anti-fungi drugs recommended for treating IA may not be safe or effective for all patients. Then, high doses of drugs are commonly required in severe infectious diseases, treatment of difficult places, and infections caused by Aspergillus spp. with increased MIC. Patients with hematological malignancy at risk for IA are also managed by receiving initial prophylaxis or controlling biomarkers without receiving prophylaxis [120]. Oral-delivered Raziol treats CPA. All treatment instructions for the invasive Aspergillosis include using azoles, Amphotericin B (AmB), or echinocandin at appropriate doses with therapeutic evidence. However, in some regions, high rates of triazole resistance have been observed in A. fumigatus. In patients without previous exposure to antifungal therapies, a worrying resistance rate of 6% has been reported [108]. Recent developments in treating Aspergillosis are presented in Table 2.

6. Actinomyces

The genus Actinomyces spp. belongs to the typical human flora that can be found in the oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract, and urinary tract. It is one of the leading oral bacteria usually identifiable in healthy dental mucosa, dental plaque biofilm, periodontal lesions, and root rot. Actinomycosis resembles malignancy, tuberculosis, or nocardiosis in terms of its continuous and gradual spread [121]. The most common species in clinical conflicts is Actinomyces israelii. Actinomycosis infections can be associated with companion microbes inhibiting the host defense or reducing oxygen stress. The onset of Actinomycosis is likely to be multifactorial, and its association with mucosal cleavage is unpredictable. For example, minor trauma to the mucosa caused Actinomycosis in one patient, while no significant actinomycosis was observed in the large ruptures of the mouth [122].

6.1. Epidemiology

In 60% of all patients, Lmpy jaw syndrome (or action) is associated with odontogenic infection. The most common clinical form is cervicofacial Actinomycosis, and the most prevalent species are A. israeli and A. gerencseriae, A. naeslundii, A. viscosus, P. propionicum, A. gerencseriae, and A. odontolyticus [122]. Actinomycosis is more common in rural areas, men, and middle-aged people (50–30 years). The mortality rate is between 0 and 28% [123].

6.2. Risk Factors

Actinomycosis is associated with dental procedures. Diabetic patients are more likely to get infections because they have structural changes in their tissues and have impaired wound healing. Tumors, surgery, and radiation may also cause local tissue damage to spread into this infection [124].

6.3. Clinical Presentation

Complete vascularization of mucosal tissues and their replacement by weakly irritated tissue in actinomycetes supports its growth and provides adequate oxygen pressure. In necrotic foci, filamentous “sulfur” granules spread as a “sunburst radiation”. The ends of these granules can form extensions or rosettes due to the adhesion of neutrophils [123]. Cervicofacial clinical symptoms, which may last from 4 days to 1 year before diagnosis, include irregularly painful soft-tissue swelling of the submandibular or perimandibular area and emptying of the sinus ducts with sulfur granules, chewing problems, and recurrent and chronic infection [123]. In about 10% of patients, the bone is involved. Chronic infection can lead to osteomyelitis of the jawbone. Osteomyelitis due to cervicofacial Actinomycosis can spread to the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, tongue, sinuses, middle ear, larynx, ciliary tract, and thyroid gland [125].

6.4. Diagnosis

The best diagnoses are histological examination and bacterial culture of abscesses or suspected tissue. Staining sulfur granules with hematoxylin–eosin turns them into round basophil masses containing eosinophilic terminal clubs. Prescribing antimicrobial drugs leading to false negative culture results may cause anemia, mild leucocytosis, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and increased C-reactive rutin value. Increased alkaline phosphatase concentrations may be seen in patients with hepatic Actinomycosis [126]. The blood test is a nonspecific diagnostic method for this disease. Imaging features are nonspecific and non-diagnostic in the early stages and may even be related to other inflammatory processes or neoplasms. Although cross-sectional imaging with CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not provide accurate or diagnostic information, it can provide accurate anatomical information for sampling. Regional lymphadenopathy is rare in these patients. In later stages, infiltration of the surrounding tissues may be observed that is not diagnostic again. An aspiration biopsy should be performed in oscillating abscesses to examine the pus in the sulfur granules [127].

6.5. Treatment

Depending on the infection course, the course of antibiotics determines the clinical manifestations and response in Actinomycosis. The treatment is experimental because no similar success has been achieved with any antibiotic. The use of high doses of intravenous antibiotics for 2–6 weeks or 6–12 months orally is the primary treatment [128]. Acute lesions are often treated with tooth extractions, abscess drainage, and antibiotics for 2–3 weeks (penicillin). The penetration of antibiotics into the lesion may be delayed by weak vessels and solid capsules. Surgical interventions such as bone necrosis removal are performed for subacute or chronic voluminous lesions [129]. The recent treatments for Actinomycosis are summarized in Table 3.

7. Streptococcus mutans

S. mutans lives in the mouth, specifically on dental plaque. Its importance is for involvement in the etiology of dental caries and its possible association with subacute infective endocarditis. Studies have shown that S. mutans is a major cause of tooth decay because of its ability to make large amounts of organic acids and activity at low pH compared to other species [154,155,156]. Through pathogenesis, S. mutans develop a biofilm starting by attachment of the initial pioneer species followed by colonization, co-adhesion, and co-aggregation of other species. Then, the bacteria produce extracellular polysaccharides, separate from the biofilm surface, and spread in the oral cavity environment [157]. S. mutans produces a sticky glucan by the action of glucosyltransferases (GTF) on sucrose that helps bacteria tight binding to the tooth surface. This binding allows bacteria to withstand rapid and frequent environmental fluctuations such as nutrient access, aerobic to anaerobic transfer, and pH changes. S. mutans also produces other virulence factors, including glucan-binding (Gbp) proteins and antigenic cell surface protein (PAc). PAc is in contact with salivary glands and plays an essential role in bacterial adhesion to tooth surfaces [158].

7.1. Epidemiology

Permanent tooth decay did not change according to age standards between 1990 and 2010 and peaked between 25 and 70, respectively. No significant differences were observed in terms of gender. Untreated tooth decay is the most common health condition worldwide. Studies have shown that the prevalence of early childhood caries is worrying in various regions worldwide [159].

7.2. Clinical Presentation

Tooth decay, the leading cause of tooth loss, is a multifactorial, infectious, and transmissible disease [160]. According to plaque-specific plaque (SPH) hypotheses, certain Gram-positive acidogenic and aciduric bacteria, including S. mutans and S. obrinus are typical infective dental plaques causing tooth decay as a biofilm-mediated disease in humans [161]. Environmental conditions such as regular daily sugar intake or salivary dysfunction increase the aciduric/acidogenic oral microbiome. As the lesions spread, the physiological balance between the tooth mineral and the biofilm fluid is disturbed, moving toward demineralization [162].

7.3. Diagnosis

Caries is diagnosed by visual and tactile dental examination. Alternative methods, including illumination-based methods such as optical coherence tomography [71], near-infrared [116], and fiber-optic technology, are also available [163]. In addition, the quantitative fluorescence light (QLF) devices, categorized by red, blue, and green labels based on the various wavelengths they generate, can be used in the early stages of caries [164]. Another method is an electronic caries monitor (ECM) that measures the bulk resistance of dental tissue. Material properties such as porosity, contact area, tissue thickness, enamel hydration, and ionic content of tooth fluids determine its electrical conductivity. Visual and radiographic assessments are used alongside other methods such as Diagnodent, ECM, or QLF. However, it is unclear whether such methods can be used as a standard tool in diagnosing tooth decay [165].

7.4. Treatment

First, biofilm management should be considered before tissue removal [166]. Patients are advised to consume less fermentable carbohydrates to correct the environmental pressures responsible for plaque biofilm dysbiosis [167]. Recent therapeutic advances are shown in Table 3.

8. Streptococcus sanguinis

S. sanguinis is a member of the Streptococcus family and a Gram-positive and facultative anaerobe. Similar to other streptococci, S. sanguinis divides along a single axis. According to reports, S.sanguinis is nonmotile. S.sanguinis use several carbohydrate sources to sustain itself. During the eruption of the first teeth of toddlers, S. sanguinis colonizes the oral cavity. Streptococcus species, however, have been reported to form biofilm during the first four to eight hours following biofilm formation. Their colonization of enamel is pioneering, particularly that of the mitis. As a result of refraining from using a toothbrush for some time, Streptococcus spp. colonizes the enamel more quickly, which could contribute to its cariogenic nature. S. sanguinis may colonize a mature biofilm at different rates, resulting in different cariogenic traits [168].

8.1. Epidemiology

Commensal bacteria such as S. sanguinis are common in the mouth. In human saliva, it can be found on tooth surfaces and the surface of the oral mucosa. In both supragingival and subgingival plaque, S. sanguinis thrives as an anaerobic species. Despite similar plaque mass, S. sanguinis biomass can differ substantially at different tooth locations. Teeth with lower incisors/canines have a high proportion of it, but upper molars with low proportions. Various dental implant surfaces have also been shown to form biofilms due to S. sanguinis [169].

8.2. Mechanism of Action

In general, S. sanguinis and S. gordonii are less acid-tolerant than S. mutans, but they contain arginine deiminases, which produce ammonia and provide ATP when exposed to acidic conditions. This system improves the survival and persistence of these organisms. Researchers have found that bacterial uptake and catabolism of specific carbohydrates can affect H2O2 and AD production by these commensals [170].

8.3. Clinical Importance

Dental caries has previously been shown to be prevented by S. sanguinis. For many years, S. mutans and humans have been antagonistic. There is a significant correlation between early S. sanguinis colonization and later S. mutans colonization. S. sanguinis levels decrease after S. mutans colonization. The inhibiting ability of S. sanguinis strains against Prevotella intermedia BS6 was found in at least one-third of the strains tested. As a result of hydrogen peroxide production by S. sanguinis, A. actinomycetemcomitans cannot grow in vitro [171]. Microbial and HSP epitope mimicry and microbial and HSP colonization of the oral mucosa have been proposed to elicit immunity and autoreactive T-cell clones. HSP stimulates adaptive and natural immune responses. Several autoimmune diseases, such as Behcet’s disease, have been linked to oral bacteria, including S. sanguinis [172].

8.4. Diagnosis

It has been primarily physiological and biochemical characteristics used to identify S. sanguinis in the past. Nevertheless, phenotypic identification methods and investigators differed in reliability and reproducibility. Previously, genotypic and phenotypic methods did not accurately identify clinical S. sanguinis isolates. To identify S. sanguinis and other oral bacteria, other methods, such as PCR with nucleic acid probes, are being investigated. [173].

9. Conclusions

Today, protecting and adequately repairing the tooth structure is the most critical approach to caries management. Successful clinical management of dental caries requires a good biological understanding of the disease process and the associated microbiome. Current approaches are based on the International Caries Consensus Collaboration (ICCC) recommendations, which state that tooth decay is a biofilm disease. In this regard, the literature states that biofilm management should be focused on before tissue removal to prevent the formation of new lesions and control the previous lesions [166]. Then, an understanding of microbiology, anatomy, pharmacology, wound healing, and oral surgery is required to manage acute dental infections. Today, the natural balance of the oral microbiome can be altered by lifestyle. The clinical goal in these patients is to establish this balance.
Despite treatment according to protocols, severe infections can be life-threatening. Therefore, using the idea of oral microbiome balance is essential for patients and healthcare professionals. The first approach is to maintain health rather than disease management. In preventing and diagnosing oral infections, healthcare providers can be very effective with activities such as controlling infections according to new protocols, educating patients, raising awareness about proper nutrition and uncontrolled sexual relationships, and motivating regular checkups. Early detection of infection and pathogens helps reduce oral or general infection. Identifying all aspects that cause antimicrobial resistance, immune system volatility profiles, potential mutations, and genotype differences should be examined in managing these infections. Timely management prevents complications in the patient and prevents the spread of the disease to others. In addition to their skills in treating these infections, clinicians need evidence-based knowledge about the pros and cons of any treatment.

10. Future Directions

It is suggested to study the mechanisms controlling the fate and function of infected tissues. Meta-analysis studies and robust trials with long follow-up periods should be performed, considering individual differences and other clinical limitations. Using the results of these studies, develop new treatments and approaches for tooth decay or damage to teeth and orofacial tissues. Several strategies have been used to prevent and manage oral infections in some not-yet-published current clinical trials. Genetics is also suggested as an important underlying factor that can affect the spread of infection and the immune response. Today, with the advancement of modern imaging systems and rigorous laboratory experiments, researchers can examine their treatment methods and disagreements in a shorter time.

Author Contributions

E.T., A.K., M.A., K.A., S.R., F.N., M.Y., H.T., A.H. and G.V.O.F. were involved in the study design, collection of data, and Writing—original draft. E.T., A.K., M.A., K.A., S.R., F.N., M.Y., H.T., A.H. and G.V.O.F. were involved in helping in writing the review article and critically reviewing the data. All authors have reviewed and accepted the final draft and are in charge of the content and similarity index of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There was no financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article is a review and does not contain any studies with humans or animals performed by any authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable comments given by colleagues.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Santosh, A.B.; Reddy, B.V. Oral Mucosal Infections: Insights into Specimen Collection and Medication Management. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 61, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Coll, P.P.; Lindsay, A.; Meng, J.; Gopalakrishna, A.; Raghavendra, S.; Bysani, P.; O’Brien, D. The Prevention of Infections in Older Adults: Oral Health. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gopalakrishnan, U.; Murthy, R.T.; Felicita, A.S.; Alshehri, A.; Awadh, W.; Almalki, A.; Vinothkumar, T.S.; Baeshen, H.A.; Bhandi, S.; Kathir, A.; et al. Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment. Int. Dent. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heboyan, A.; Avetisyan, A.; Skallevold, H.E.; Rokaya, D.; Marla, V.; Vardanyan, A. Occurrence of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS) as a Rare Oral Manifestation in a Patient with Gilbert’s Syndrome. Case Rep. Dent. 2021, 2021, 6648729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heboyan, A.; Karobari, M.I.; Marya, A. Possible oral manifestation after vaccination against COVID-19: A case report. Oxf. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 2022, omac136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heboyan, A.; Manrikyan, M.; Zafar, M.S.; Rokaya, D.; Nushikyan, R.; Vardanyan, I.; Vardanyan, A.; Khurshid, Z. Bacteriological Evaluation of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in Teeth Restored Using Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vivo Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbasi, K.; Tavakolizadeh, S.; Hadi, A.; Hosseini, M.; Soufdoost, R.S.; Heboyan, A.; Alam, M.; Fani-Hanifeh, S. The wound healing effect of collagen/adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) hydrogel: In vivo study. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dahlén, G. Bacterial infections of the oral mucosa. Periodontol. 2000 2009, 49, 13–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yazdanian, M.; Rahmani, A.; Tahmasebi, E.; Tebyanian, H.; Yazdanian, A.; Mosaddad, S.A. Current and advanced nanomaterials in dentistry as regeneration agents: An update. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 899–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ogle, O.E. Odontogenic Infections. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 61, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karobari, M.I.; Siddharthan, S.; Adil, A.H.; Khan, M.M.; Venugopal, A.; Rokaya, D.; Heboyan, A.; Marya, C.M.; Marya, A. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting oral and periodontal health and quality of life in south asia. Open Dent. J. 2022, 16, e187421062209270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marya, A.; Rokaya, D.; Heboyan, A.; Fernandes, G.V. Biomolecular and Biochemical Aspects of the Oral Cavity. Molecules 2022, 27, 8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hussain, A.; Tebyaniyan, H.; Khayatan, D. The Role of Epigenetic in Dental and Oral Regenerative Medicine by Different Types of Dental Stem Cells: A Comprehensive Overview. Stem Cells Int. 2022, 2022, 5304860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramzan, M.; Karobari, M.I.; Heboyan, A.; Mohamed, R.N.; Mustafa, M.; Basheer, S.N.; Desai, V.; Batool, S.; Ahmed, N.; Zeshan, B. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Extracts of Wild Ginger (Zingiber zerumbet) with Antibacterial Activity against Selective Multidrug Resistant Oral Bacteria. Molecules 2022, 27, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Srimaneepong, V.; Heboyan, A.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z.; Marya, A.; Fernandes, G.V.O.; Rokaya, D. Fixed Prosthetic Restorations and Periodontal Health: A Narrative Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aurelius, E.; Franzen-Röhl, E.; Glimåker, M.; Akre, O.; Grillner, L.; Jorup-Rönström, C.; Studahl, M.; Group, H.-M.S. Long-term valacyclovir suppressive treatment after herpes simplex virus type 2 meningitis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schang, L.M. Timing Is Everything. mBio 2018, 9, e02140-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Whitley, R.J. Herpes Simplex Virus Infections of the Central Nervous System. Continuum 2015, 21, 1704–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kukhanova, M.K.; Korovina, A.N.; Kochetkov, S.N. Human herpes simplex virus: Life cycle and development of inhibitors. Biochem. Biokhimiia 2014, 79, 1635–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pires de Mello, C.P.; Bloom, D.C.; Paixão, I.C. Herpes simplex virus type-1: Replication, latency, reactivation and its antiviral targets. Antivir. Ther. 2016, 21, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Levin, M.J.; Weinberg, A.; Schmid, D.S. Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khadr, L.; Harfouche, M.; Omori, R.; Schwarzer, G.; Chemaitelly, H.; Abu-Raddad, L.J. The Epidemiology of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Asia: Systematic Review, Meta-analyses, and Meta-regressions. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2019, 68, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Betz, D.; Fane, K. Herpetic Whitlow. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  24. Damour, A.; Garcia, M.; Seneschal, J.; Lévêque, N.; Bodet, C. Eczema Herpeticum: Clinical and Pathophysiological Aspects. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 59, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parra-Sánchez, M. Genital ulcers caused by herpes simplex virus. Enferm. Infecc. Y Microbiol. Clin. 2019, 37, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Corstjens, P.L.; Abrams, W.R.; Malamud, D. Saliva and viral infections. Periodontol. 2000 2016, 70, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Balasubramaniam, R.; Kuperstein, A.S.; Stoopler, E.T. Update on oral herpes virus infections. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 58, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Samies, N.L.; James, S.H. Prevention and treatment of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Antivir. Res. 2020, 176, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schnitzler, P. Essential Oils for the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus Infections. Chemotherapy 2019, 64, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Venturi, C.R.; Danielli, L.J.; Klein, F.; Apel, M.A.; Montanha, J.A.; Bordignon, S.A.; Roehe, P.M.; Fuentefria, A.M.; Henriques, A.T. Chemical analysis and in vitro antiviral and antifungal activities of essential oils from Glechon spathulata and Glechon marifolia. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ang, K.K.; Harris, J.; Wheeler, R.; Weber, R.; Rosenthal, D.I.; Nguyen-Tân, P.F.; Westra, W.H.; Chung, C.H.; Jordan, R.C.; Lu, C.; et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Joura, E.A.; Garland, S.M.; Paavonen, J.; Ferris, D.G.; Perez, G.; Ault, K.A.; Huh, W.K.; Sings, H.L.; James, M.K.; Haupt, R.M. Effect of the human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine in a subgroup of women with cervical and vulvar disease: Retrospective pooled analysis of trial data. BMJ 2012, 344, e1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Perti, T.; Saracino, M.; Baeten, J.M.; Johnston, C.; Diem, K.; Ocbamichael, N.; Huang, M.L.; Selke, S.; Magaret, A.; Corey, L.; et al. High-dose valacyclovir decreases plasma HIV-1 RNA more than standard-dose acyclovir in persons coinfected with HIV-1 and HSV-2: A randomized crossover trial. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2013, 63, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Van Wagoner, N.; Geisler, W.M.; Bachmann, L.H.; Hook, E.W. The effect of valacyclovir on HIV and HSV-2 in HIV-infected persons on antiretroviral therapy with previously unrecognised HSV-2. Int. J. STD AIDS 2015, 26, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Le Cleach, L.; Trinquart, L.; Do, G.; Maruani, A.; Lebrun-Vignes, B.; Ravaud, P.; Chosidow, O. Oral antiviral therapy for prevention of genital herpes outbreaks in immunocompetent and nonpregnant patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 8, Cd009036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Donatini, B. Control of oral human papillomavirus (HPV) by medicinal mushrooms, Trametes versicolor and Ganoderma lucidum: A preliminary clinical trial. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2014, 16, 497–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Trimble, C.L.; Morrow, M.P.; Kraynyak, K.A.; Shen, X.; Dallas, M.; Yan, J.; Edwards, L.; Parker, R.L.; Denny, L.; Giffear, M.; et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 2015, 386, 2078–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Wald, A.; Timmler, B.; Magaret, A.; Warren, T.; Tyring, S.; Johnston, C.; Fife, K.; Selke, S.; Huang, M.L.; Stobernack, H.P.; et al. Effect of Pritelivir Compared With Valacyclovir on Genital HSV-2 Shedding in Patients With Frequent Recurrences: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016, 316, 2495–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Guo, X.; Qiu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Song, L.; Li, Y.; Huang, K.; Du, X.; Fan, W.; et al. A randomized open-label clinical trial of an anti-HPV biological dressing (JB01-BD) administered intravaginally to treat high-risk HPV infection. Microbes Infect. 2016, 18, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tyring, S.K.; Lee, P.; Hill, G.T., Jr.; Silverfield, J.C.; Moore, A.Y.; Matkovits, T.; Sullivan-Bolyai, J. FV-100 versus valacyclovir for the prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia and the treatment of acute herpes zoster-associated pain: A randomized-controlled trial. J. Med. Virol. 2017, 89, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Van Wagoner, N.; Fife, K.; Leone, P.A.; Bernstein, D.I.; Warren, T.; Panther, L.; Novak, R.M.; Beigi, R.; Kriesel, J.; Tyring, S.; et al. Effects of Different Doses of GEN-003, a Therapeutic Vaccine for Genital Herpes Simplex Virus-2, on Viral Shedding and Lesions: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 1890–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mohseni, A.H.; Taghinezhad, S.S.; Keyvani, H.; Ghobadi, N. Comparison of Acyclovir and Multistrain Lactobacillus brevis in Women with Recurrent Genital Herpes Infections: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nofal, A.; Marei, A.; Ibrahim, A.M.; Nofal, E.; Nabil, M. Intralesional versus intramuscular bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the treatment of recalcitrant common warts. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 82, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peyman, A.; Nayebzadeh, M.; Peyman, M.; Afshari, N.A.; Pourazizi, M. Topical cyclosporine-A versus prednisolone for herpetic stromal keratitis: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, e194–e198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. De Rosa, N.; Giampaolino, P.; Lavitola, G.; Morra, I.; Formisano, C.; Nappi, C.; Bifulco, G. Effect of Immunomodulatory Supplements Based on Echinacea Angustifolia and Echinacea Purpurea on the Posttreatment Relapse Incidence of Genital Condylomatosis: A Prospective Randomized Study. BioMed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 3548396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Yang, Y.; Meng, Y.L.; Duan, S.M.; Zhan, S.B.; Guan, R.L.; Yue, T.F.; Kong, L.H.; Zhou, L.; Deng, L.H.; Huang, C.; et al. REBACIN® as a noninvasive clinical intervention for high-risk human papillomavirus persistent infection. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 2712–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tan, D.H.S.; Raboud, J.M.; Szadkowski, L.; Grinsztejn, B.; Madruga, J.V.; Figueroa, M.I.; Cahn, P.; Barton, S.E.; Clarke, A.; Fox, J.; et al. Effect of valaciclovir on CD4 count decline in untreated HIV: An international randomized controlled trial. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Allen, C.T.; Lee, S.; Norberg, S.M.; Kovalovsky, D.; Ye, H.; Clavijo, P.E.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Schlegel, R.; Schlom, J.; Strauss, J.; et al. Safety and clinical activity of PD-L1 blockade in patients with aggressive recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Breier, A.; Buchanan, R.W.; D’Souza, D.; Nuechterlein, K.; Marder, S.; Dunn, W.; Preskorn, S.; Macaluso, M.; Wurfel, B.; Maguire, G.; et al. Herpes simplex virus 1 infection and valacyclovir treatment in schizophrenia: Results from the VISTA study. Schizophr. Res. 2019, 206, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luyt, C.E.; Forel, J.M.; Hajage, D.; Jaber, S.; Cayot-Constantin, S.; Rimmelé, T.; Coupez, E.; Lu, Q.; Diallo, M.H.; Penot-Ragon, C.; et al. Acyclovir for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Herpes Simplex Virus Oropharyngeal Reactivation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murray, M.L.; Meadows, J.; Doré, C.J.; Copas, A.J.; Haddow, L.J.; Lacey, C.; Jit, M.; Soldan, K.; Bennett, K.; Tetlow, M.; et al. Human papillomavirus infection: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of imiquimod cream (5%) versus podophyllotoxin cream (0.15%), in combination with quadrivalent human papillomavirus or control vaccination in the treatment and prevention of recurrence of anogenital warts (HIPvac trial). BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Syrjänen, S. Oral manifestations of human papillomavirus infections. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2018, 126 (Suppl. 1), 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kranz, S.; Guellmar, A.; Olschowsky, P.; Tonndorf-Martini, S.; Heyder, M.; Pfister, W.; Reise, M.; Sigusch, B. Antimicrobial Effect of Natural Berry Juices on Common Oral Pathogenic Bacteria. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Crosbie, E.J.; Einstein, M.H.; Franceschi, S.; Kitchener, H.C. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2013, 382, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kumaraswamy, K.L.; Vidhya, M. Human papilloma virus and oral infections: An update. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2011, 7, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rettig, E.M.; D’Souza, G. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 24, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gillison, M.L.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; Anderson, W.F.; Fakhry, C. Epidemiology of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 3235–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Lerman, M.A.; Almazrooa, S.; Lindeman, N.; Hall, D.; Villa, A.; Woo, S.B. HPV-16 in a distinct subset of oral epithelial dysplasia. Mod. Pathol. Off. J. U. S. Can. Acad. Pathol. Inc. 2017, 30, 1646–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Antonsson, A.; Cornford, M.; Perry, S.; Davis, M.; Dunne, M.P.; Whiteman, D.C. Prevalence and risk factors for oral HPV infection in young Australians. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Anderson, K.S.; Wong, J.; D’Souza, G.; Riemer, A.B.; Lorch, J.; Haddad, R.; Pai, S.I.; Longtine, J.; McClean, M.; LaBaer, J.; et al. Serum antibodies to the HPV16 proteome as biomarkers for head and neck cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 1896–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tezal, M.; Scannapieco, F.A.; Wactawski-Wende, J.; Hyland, A.; Marshall, J.R.; Rigual, N.R.; Stoler, D.L. Local inflammation and human papillomavirus status of head and neck cancers. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2012, 138, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shipilova, A.; Dayakar, M.M.; Gupta, D. High risk human papillomavirus in the periodontium: A case control study. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2017, 21, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chai, R.C.; Lambie, D.; Verma, M.; Punyadeera, C. Current trends in the etiology and diagnosis of HPV-related head and neck cancers. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Pfaffe, T.; Cooper-White, J.; Beyerlein, P.; Kostner, K.; Punyadeera, C. Diagnostic potential of saliva: Current state and future applications. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mayer, F.L.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 2013, 4, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Metwalli, K.H.; Khan, S.A.; Krom, B.P.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, and the human mouth: A sticky situation. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Seifi Kafshgari, H.; Yazdanian, M.; Ranjbar, R.; Tahmasebi, E.; Mirsaeed, S.; Tebyanian, H.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A.; Goli, H.R. The effect of Citrullus colocynthis extracts on Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, normal gingival fibroblast and breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Res. 2019, 92, 8201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hellstein, J.W.; Marek, C.L. Candidiasis: Red and white manifestations in the oral cavity. Head Neck Pathol. 2019, 13, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hood, S.; Denning, D. Treatment of fungal infection in AIDS. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1996, 37, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Reinhardt, L.; Nascente, P.; Ribeiro, J.; Guimarães, V.; Etges, A.; Lund, R. Sensitivity to antifungals by Candida spp samples isolated from cases of chronic atrophic candidiasis (CAC). Braz. J. Biol. 2020, 80, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Benito-Cruz, B.; Aranda-Romo, S.; López-Esqueda, F.J.; de la Rosa-García, E.; Rosas-Hernández, R.; Sánchez-Vargas, L.O. Oral Candida isolates and fluconazole susceptibility patterns in older Mexican women. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016, 65, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bhattacharya, S.; Sae-Tia, S.; Fries, B.C. Candidiasis and mechanisms of antifungal resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Watthanasaen, S.; Merchant, A.T.; Luengpailin, S.; Chansamak, N.; Pisek, A.; Pitiphat, W. Xylitol-containing Chewing Gum for Caries Prevention in Students with Disabilities: A Randomised Trial. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2017, 15, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cabras, M.; Gambino, A.; Broccoletti, R.; Lodi, G.; Arduino, P.G. Treatment of angular cheilitis: A narrative review and authors’ clinical experience. Oral Dis. 2020, 26, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alnuaimi, A.D.; Wiesenfeld, D.; O′Brien-Simpson, N.M.; Reynolds, E.C.; McCullough, M.J. Oral Candida colonization in oral cancer patients and its relationship with traditional risk factors of oral cancer: A matched case-control study. Oral Oncol. 2015, 51, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Awotiwon, A.A.; Johnson, S.; Rutherford, G.W.; Meintjes, G.; Eshun-Wilson, I. Primary antifungal prophylaxis for cryptococcal disease in HIV-positive people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 8, Cd004773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Patel, M.; Shackleton, J.-A.; Coogan, M.M.; Galpin, J. Antifungal effect of mouth rinses on oral Candida counts and salivary flow in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2008, 22, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arya, N.R.; Rafiq, N.B. Candidiasis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  79. Custodio, W.; Silva, W.J.; Paes Leme, A.F.; Cury, J.A.; Del Bel Cury, A.A. Plasma proteins in the acquired denture pellicle enhance substrate surface free energy and Candida albicans phospholipase and proteinase activities. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2015, 6, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Houšť, J.; Spížek, J.; Havlíček, V. Antifungal drugs. Metabolites 2020, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Gacon, I.; Loster, J.E.; Wieczorek, A. Relationship between oral hygiene and fungal growth in patients: Users of an acrylic denture without signs of inflammatory process. Clin. Interv. Aging 2019, 14, 1297–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ishikawa, K.H.; Mayer, M.P.; Miyazima, T.Y.; Matsubara, V.H.; Silva, E.G.; Paula, C.R.; Campos, T.T.; Nakamae, A.E. A multispecies probiotic reduces oral Candida colonization in denture wearers. J. Prosthodont. Off. J. Am. Coll. Prosthodont. 2015, 24, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vento-Zahra, E.; De Wever, B.; Decelis, S.; Mallia, K.; Camilleri, S. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of nitradine tablets in maxillary removable orthodontic appliance patients. Quintessence Int. 2011, 42, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  84. Voskamp, A.L.; Gillman, A.; Symons, K.; Sandrini, A.; Rolland, J.M.; O’Hehir, R.E.; Douglass, J.A. Clinical efficacy and immunologic effects of omalizumab in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2015, 3, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kraft-Bodi, E.; Jørgensen, M.R.; Keller, M.K.; Kragelund, C.; Twetman, S. Effect of Probiotic Bacteria on Oral Candida in Frail Elderly. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 181s–186s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Colombari, B.; Tagliazucchi, D.; Odorici, A.; Pericolini, E.; Foltran, I.; Pinetti, D.; Meto, A.; Peppoloni, S.; Blasi, E. Pomegranate Extract Affects Fungal Biofilm Production: Consumption of Phenolic Compounds and Alteration of Fungal Autoinducers Release. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ranawaka, R.R.; Nagahawatte, A.; Gunasekara, T.A.; Weerakoon, H.S.; de Silva, S.H. Randomized, double-blind, comparative study on efficacy and safety of itraconazole pulse therapy and terbinafine pulse therapy on nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis: A study with 90 patients. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2016, 27, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Maertens, J.A.; Raad, I.I.; Marr, K.A.; Patterson, T.F.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Cornely, O.A.; Bow, E.J.; Rahav, G.; Neofytos, D.; Aoun, M.; et al. Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): A phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sushma, R.; Sathe, T.T.; Farias, A.; Sanyal, P.K.; Kiran, S. “Nature cures:” An alternative herbal formulation as a denture cleanser. Ann. Afr. Med. 2017, 16, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Atai, Z.; Atai, M.; Amini, J.; Salehi, N. In vivo study of antifungal effects of low-molecular-weight chitosan against Candida albicans. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 59, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Miyazima, T.Y.; Ishikawa, K.H.; Mayer, M.; Saad, S.; Nakamae, A. Cheese supplemented with probiotics reduced the Candida levels in denture wearers-RCT. Oral. Dis. 2017, 23, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sandison, T.; Ong, V.; Lee, J.; Thye, D. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of CD101 IV, a Novel Echinocandin, in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01627-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Keller, M.K.; Kragelund, C. Randomized pilot study on probiotic effects on recurrent candidiasis in oral lichen planus patients. Oral. Dis. 2018, 24, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mofatteh, M.R.; Naseripour Yazdi, Z.; Yousefi, M.; Namaei, M.H. Comparison of the recovery rate of otomycosis using betadine and clotrimazole topical treatment. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 84, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Agarwal, R.; Dhooria, S.; Singh Sehgal, I.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Garg, M.; Saikia, B.; Behera, D.; Chakrabarti, A. A Randomized Trial of Itraconazole vs Prednisolone in Acute-Stage Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis Complicating Asthma. Chest 2018, 153, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. de Senna, A.M.; Vieira, M.M.F.; Machado-de-Sena, R.M.; Bertolin, A.O.; Núñez, S.C.; Ribeiro, M.S. Photodynamic inactivation of Candida ssp. on denture stomatitis. A clinical trial involving palatal mucosa and prosthesis disinfection. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 22, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kullberg, B.J.; Viscoli, C.; Pappas, P.G.; Vazquez, J.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Rotstein, C.; Sobel, J.D.; Herbrecht, R.; Rahav, G.; Jaruratanasirikul, S.; et al. Isavuconazole Versus Caspofungin in the Treatment of Candidemia and Other Invasive Candida Infections: The ACTIVE Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2019, 68, 1981–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Saeed, A.; Haider, A.; Zahid, S.; Khan, S.A.; Faryal, R.; Kaleem, M. In-vitro antifungal efficacy of tissue conditioner-chitosan composites as potential treatment therapy for denture stomatitis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Afroozi, B.; Zomorodian, K.; Lavaee, F.; Zare Shahrabadi, Z.; Mardani, M. Comparison of the efficacy of indocyanine green-mediated photodynamic therapy and nystatin therapy in treatment of denture stomatitis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 27, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. de Souza, R.F.; Silva-Lovato, C.H.; de Arruda, C.N.; Regis, R.R.; Zanini, A.P.; Longo, D.L.; Peracini, A.; de Andrade, I.M.; Watanabe, E.; Paranhos, H.F. Efficacy of a propolis solution for cleaning complete dentures. Am. J. Dent. 2019, 32, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Mustafa, M.W.; Ungphaiboon, S.; Phadoongsombut, N.; Pangsomboon, K.; Chelae, S.; Mahattanadul, S. Effectiveness of an Alcohol-Free Chitosan-Curcuminoid Mouthwash Compared with Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Denture Stomatitis Treatment: A Randomized Trial. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2019, 25, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Tomioka, H.; Kaneda, T.; Kida, Y.; Kaneko, M.; Fujii, H.; Hayashi, M.; Tomii, K.; Tada, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Karino, T. [An open, noncomparative multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of itraconazole injections and high dose capsules in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi J. Jpn. Assoc. Infect. Dis. 2011, 85, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Mammen, M.P.; Armas, D.; Hughes, F.H.; Hopkins, A.M.; Fisher, C.L.; Resch, P.A.; Rusalov, D.; Sullivan, S.M.; Smith, L.R. First-in-Human Phase 1 Study To Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Antifungal Drug, VL-2397, in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00969-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alrabiah, M.; Alsahhaf, A.; Alofi, R.S.; Al-Aali, K.A.; Abduljabbar, T.; Vohra, F. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy versus local nystatin in the treatment of denture stomatitis: A randomized clinical study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 28, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tasso, C.O.; de Oliveira Zoccolotti, J.; Ferrisse, T.M.; Malavolta, I.F.; Jorge, J.H. Effectiveness of Disinfectant Liquid Soaps in the Reduction of Candida spp Present in Complete Dentures: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 33, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Doppalapudi, R.; Vundavalli, S.; Prabhat, M.P. Effect of probiotic bacteria on oral Candida in head- and neck-radiotherapy patients: A randomized clinical trial. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2020, 16, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jimenez-Garcia, L.; Celis-Aguilar, E.; Díaz-Pavón, G.; Muñoz Estrada, V.; Castro-Urquizo, Á.; Hernández-Castillo, N.; Amaro-Flores, E. Efficacy of topical clotrimazole vs. topical tolnaftate in the treatment of otomycosis. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 86, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Latgé, J.-P.; Chamilos, G. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 33, e00140-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Obar, J.J. Sensing the threat posed by Aspergillus infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Van De Veerdonk, F.L.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Romani, L.; Netea, M.G.; Latge, J.-P. Aspergillus fumigatus morphology and dynamic host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bongomin, F.; Batac, C.; Richardson, M.D.; Denning, D.W. A review of onychomycosis due to Aspergillus species. Mycopathologia 2018, 183, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Heinekamp, T.; Schmidt, H.; Lapp, K.; Pähtz, V.; Shopova, I.; Köster-Eiserfunke, N.; Krüger, T.; Kniemeyer, O.; Brakhage, A.A. Interference of Aspergillus fumigatus with the immune response. In Proceedings of Seminars in Immunopathology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  113. Williams, C.; Rajendran, R.; Ramage, G. Aspergillus biofilms in human disease. Fungal Biofilms Relat. Infect. 2016, 931, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  114. Rowe-Jones, J.M.; Moore-Gillon, V. Destructive noninvasive paranasal sinus aspergillosis: Component of a spectrum of disease. J. Otolaryngol. 1994, 23, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Chakrabarti, A.; Kaur, H. Allergic aspergillus rhinosinusitis. J. Fungi 2016, 2, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Telles, D.R.; Karki, N.; Marshall, M.W. Oral fungal infections: Diagnosis and management. Dent. Clin. 2017, 61, 319–349. [Google Scholar]
  117. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R., III; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Ullmann, A.J.; Aguado, J.M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Denning, D.W.; Groll, A.H.; Lagrou, K.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Lewis, R.E.; Munoz, P.; Verweij, P.E. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: Executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, e1–e38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Page, I.D.; Richardson, M.D.; Denning, D.W. Comparison of six Aspergillus-specific IgG assays for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). J. Infect. 2016, 72, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Taccone, F.S.; Van den Abeele, A.-M.; Bulpa, P.; Misset, B.; Meersseman, W.; Cardoso, T.; Paiva, J.-A.; Blasco-Navalpotro, M.; De Laere, E.; Dimopoulos, G. Epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: Clinical presentation, underlying conditions, and outcomes. Crit. Care 2015, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Kawashima, J.; Nakajo, K.; Washio, J.; Mayanagi, G.; Shimauchi, H.; Takahashi, N. Fluoride-sensitivity of growth and acid production of oral Actinomyces: Comparison with oral Streptococcus. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 57, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Valour, F.; Sénéchal, A.; Dupieux, C.; Karsenty, J.; Lustig, S.; Breton, P.; Gleizal, A.; Boussel, L.; Laurent, F.; Braun, E. Actinomycosis: Etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect. Drug Resist. 2014, 7, 183. [Google Scholar]
  123. Boyanova, L.; Kolarov, R.; Mateva, L.; Markovska, R.; Mitov, I. Actinomycosis: A frequently forgotten disease. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wong, V.K.; Turmezei, T.; Weston, V. Actinomycosis. BMJ 2011, 343, d6099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Moghimi, M.; Salentijn, E.; Debets-Ossenkop, Y.; Karagozoglu, K.H.; Forouzanfar, T. Treatment of cervicofacial actinomycosis: A report of 19 cases and review of literature. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Y Cir. Bucal 2013, 18, e627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Attaway, A.; Flynn, T. Actinomyces meyeri: From “lumpy jaw” to empyema. Infection 2013, 41, 1025–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Stájer, A.; Ibrahim, B.; Gajdács, M.; Urbán, E.; Baráth, Z. Diagnosis and management of cervicofacial actinomycosis: Lessons from two distinct clinical cases. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Moturi, K.; Kaila, V. Cervicofacial actinomycosis and its management. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 8, 361. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  129. Balbinot, K.M.; Sousa, N.W.A.; Pinheiro, J.d.J.V.; Ribeiro, A.L.R. Surgical debridement as a treatment strategy for cervicofacial actinomycosis—Literature review and case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 73, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Chavan, S.D.; Shetty, N.L.; Kanuri, M. Comparative evaluation of garlic extract mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans count—An in vitro study. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2010, 8, 369–374. [Google Scholar]
  131. Haas, A.N.; Silva-Boghossian, C.M.; Colombo, A.P.; Susin, C.; Albandar, J.M.; Oppermann, R.V.; Rösing, C.K. Adjunctive azithromycin in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis: Microbiological findings of a 12-month randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Faveri, M.; Rebello, A.; de Oliveira Dias, R.; Borges-Junior, I.; Duarte, P.M.; Figueiredo, L.C.; Feres, M. Clinical and microbiologic effects of adjunctive metronidazole plus amoxicillin in the treatment of generalized chronic periodontitis: Smokers versus non-smokers. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Tulsani, S.G.; Chikkanarasaiah, N.; Siddaiah, S.B.; Krishnamurthy, N.H. The effect of Propolis and Xylitol chewing gums on salivary Streptococcus mutans count: A clinical trial. Indian J. Dent. Res. Off. Publ. Indian Soc. Dent. Res. 2014, 25, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Parkar, S.G.; Eady, S.; Cabecinha, M.; Skinner, M.A. Consumption of apple-boysenberry beverage decreases salivary Actinomyces naeslundii and their adhesion in a multi-species biofilm model. Benef. Microbes 2017, 8, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Marya, C.M.; Taneja, P.; Nagpal, R.; Marya, V.; Oberoi, S.S.; Arora, D. Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Xylitol, and Chlorhexidine + Xylitol against Dental Plaque, Gingivitis, and Salivary Streptococcus mutans Load: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2017, 15, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Choo, J.M.; Abell, G.C.J.; Thomson, R.; Morgan, L.; Waterer, G.; Gordon, D.L.; Taylor, S.L.; Leong, L.E.X.; Wesselingh, S.L.; Burr, L.D.; et al. Impact of Long-Term Erythromycin Therapy on the Oropharyngeal Microbiome and Resistance Gene Reservoir in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis. mSphere 2018, 3, e00103-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Gutiérrez-Venegas, G.; Gómez-Mora, J.A.; Meraz-Rodríguez, M.A.; Flores-Sánchez, M.A.; Ortiz-Miranda, L.F. Effect of flavonoids on antimicrobial activity of microorganisms present in dental plaque. Heliyon 2019, 5, e03013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Kang, S.M.; Jung, H.I.; Kim, B.I. Susceptibility of oral bacteria to antibacterial photodynamic therapy. J. Oral Microbiol. 2019, 11, 1644111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Liu, D.; Peng, X.; Wang, S.; Han, Q.; Li, B.; Zhou, X.; Ren, B.; Xu, H.H.K.; Weir, M.D.; Li, M.; et al. A novel antibacterial resin-based root canal sealer modified by Dimethylaminododecyl Methacrylate. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Sánchez, M.C.; Ribeiro-Vidal, H.; Esteban-Fernández, A.; Bartolomé, B.; Figuero, E.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Sanz, M.; Herrera, D. Antimicrobial activity of red wine and oenological extracts against periodontal pathogens in a validated oral biofilm model. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Lee, M.J.; Kwon, J.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Ryu, J.H.; Seo, J.Y.; Jang, S.; Kim, K.M.; Hwang, C.J.; Choi, S.H. Bioactive resin-based composite with surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler and zwitterionic material to prevent the formation of multi-species biofilm. Dent. Mater. Off. Publ. Acad. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Rafiee, A.; Memarpour, M.; Najibi, Y.; Khalvati, B.; Kianpour, S.; Morowvat, M.H. Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Novel Antibiotic-Eluting Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Scaffold against a Dual-Species Biofilm in an Infected Immature Root Canal Model. BioMed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 6623830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Vinothkumar, T.S.; Apathsakayan, R.; El-Shamy, F.M.M.; Homeida, H.E.; Hommedi, A.I.M.; Safhi, M.Y.A.; Alsalhi, H.A.M. Antibacterial effect of diode laser on different cariogenic bacteria: An In-vitro study. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2020, 23, 1578–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bueno, J.; Sánchez, M.C.; Toledano-Osorio, M.; Figuero, E.; Toledano, M.; Medina-Castillo, A.L.; Osorio, R.; Herrera, D.; Sanz, M. Antimicrobial effect of nanostructured membranes for guided tissue regeneration: An in vitro study. Dent. Mater. Off. Publ. Acad. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 1566–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fei, X.; Li, Y.; Weir, M.D.; Baras, B.H.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Melo, M.A.S.; Ruan, J.; Xu, H.H.K. Novel pit and fissure sealant containing nano-CaF(2) and dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate with double benefits of fluoride release and antibacterial function. Dent. Mater. Off. Publ. Acad. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Marcoux, E.; Lagha, A.B.; Gauthier, P.; Grenier, D. Antimicrobial activities of natural plant compounds against endodontic pathogens and biocompatibility with human gingival fibroblasts. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 116, 104734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Niu, Y.; Wang, K.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Q.; Li, H.; Ding, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, L. Antibacterial Effect of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Cariogenic Bacteria and Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00251-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Mayumi, K.; Miyaji, H.; Miyata, S.; Nishida, E.; Furihata, T.; Kanemoto, Y.; Sugaya, T.; Shitomi, K.; Akasaka, T. Antibacterial coating of tooth surface with ion-releasing pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) nanofillers. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Sumioka, R.; Nakata, M.; Okahashi, N.; Li, Y.; Wada, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Sumitomo, T.; Hayashi, M.; Kawabata, S. Streptococcus sanguinis induces neutrophil cell death by production of hydrogen peroxide. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Jia, X.; Peng, X.; Xie, Q.; Zou, J.; Zheng, L.; et al. Probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 Alleviates Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 684824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. MacDonald, K.W.; Chanyi, R.M.; Macklaim, J.M.; Cadieux, P.A.; Reid, G.; Burton, J.P. Streptococcus salivarius inhibits immune activation by periodontal disease pathogens. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Puccio, T.; An, S.S.; Schultz, A.C.; Lizarraga, C.A.; Bryant, A.S.; Culp, D.J.; Burne, R.A.; Kitten, T. Manganese transport by Streptococcus sanguinis in acidic conditions and its impact on growth in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Microbiol. 2022, 117, 375–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Odorici, A.; Colombari, B.; Bellini, P.; Meto, A.; Venturelli, I.; Blasi, E. Novel Options to Counteract Oral Biofilm Formation: In Vitro Evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lemos, J.A.; Quivey, R.G., Jr.; Koo, H.; Abranches, J. Streptococcus mutans: A new Gram-positive paradigm? Microbiology 2013, 159, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yazdanian, M.; Rostamzadeh, P.; Rahbar, M.; Alam, M.; Abbasi, K.; Tahmasebi, E.; Tebyaniyan, H.; Ranjbar, R.; Seifalian, A.; Yazdanian, A. The Potential Application of Green-Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2022, 2022, 2311910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yazdanian, M.; Rostamzadeh, P.; Alam, M.; Abbasi, K.; Tahmasebi, E.; Tebyaniyan, H.; Ranjbar, R.; Seifalian, A.; Moghaddam, M.M.; Kahnamoei, M.B. Evaluation of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of Echinacea and Arctium extracts and Zataria essential oil. AMB Express 2022, 12, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Strużycka, I. The oral microbiome in dental caries. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Matsumoto-Nakano, M. Role of Streptococcus mutans surface proteins for biofilm formation. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2018, 54, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Frencken, J.E.; Sharma, P.; Stenhouse, L.; Green, D.; Laverty, D.; Dietrich, T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis–a comprehensive review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, S94–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Pitts, N.B.; Zero, D.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Ekstrand, K.; Weintraub, J.A.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Tagami, J.; Twetman, S.; Tsakos, G.; Ismail, A. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Braga, M.M.; Mendes, F.M.; Ekstrand, K.R. Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent. Clin. 2010, 54, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chen, X.; Daliri, E.B.-M.; Kim, N.; Kim, J.-R.; Yoo, D.; Oh, D.-H. Microbial etiology and prevention of dental caries: Exploiting natural products to inhibit cariogenic biofilms. Pathogens 2020, 9, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Macey, R.; Walsh, T.; Riley, P.; Hogan, R.; Glenny, A.-M.; Worthington, H.V.; Clarkson, J.E.; Ricketts, D. Transillumination and optical coherence tomography for the detection and diagnosis of enamel caries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 1, CD013855. [Google Scholar]
  164. Cochrane, N.; Walker, G.; Manton, D.; Reynolds, E. Comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence, digital photography and transverse microradiography for quantification of enamel remineralization. Aust. Dent. J. 2012, 57, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Gomez, J. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Frencken, J.; Innes, N.; Schwendicke, F. Managing Carious Lesions: Why Do We Need Consensus on Terminology and Clinical Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal? SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  167. Philip, N.; Suneja, B.; Walsh, L. Beyond Streptococcus mutans: Clinical implications of the evolving dental caries aetiological paradigms and its associated microbiome. Br. Dent. J. 2018, 224, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Zhu, B.; Macleod, L.C.; Kitten, T.; Xu, P. Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm formation & interaction with oral pathogens. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 915–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Stingu, C.S.; Eschrich, K.; Rodloff, A.C.; Schaumann, R.; Jentsch, H. Periodontitis is associated with a loss of colonization by Streptococcus sanguinis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 57, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Zeng, L.; Walker, A.R.; Lee, K.; Taylor, Z.A.; Burne, R.A. Spontaneous Mutants of Streptococcus sanguinis with Defects in the Glucose-Phosphotransferase System Show Enhanced Post-Exponential-Phase Fitness. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e0037521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Dye, B.A.; Thornton-Evans, G.; Li, X.; Iafolla, T.J. Dental caries and sealant prevalence in children and adolescents in the United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief 2015, 191, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  172. Alpsoy, E.; Bozca, B.C.; Bilgic, A. Behçet disease: An update for dermatologists. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2021, 22, 477–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; Qi, F.; Caufield, P.W. Identification of Streptococcus sanguinis with a PCR-generated species-specific DNA probe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 3481–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The latent infection of HSV-1 leads to permanent arrest in an G0/G1-like state in the sensory ganglia that will never reenter mitosis ①. During reactivation, virus genes are expressed in cells in the most permissive state ②. Then, reactivated virions travels in axons ③ to termini on the epidermis ④, and then transmitted to the spinosum and granulosum strata layers of the epidermis ⑤ [17].
Figure 1. The latent infection of HSV-1 leads to permanent arrest in an G0/G1-like state in the sensory ganglia that will never reenter mitosis ①. During reactivation, virus genes are expressed in cells in the most permissive state ②. Then, reactivated virions travels in axons ③ to termini on the epidermis ④, and then transmitted to the spinosum and granulosum strata layers of the epidermis ⑤ [17].
Life 13 00269 g001
Table 1. Recent developments in treating orofacial viral infections.
Table 1. Recent developments in treating orofacial viral infections.
SpeciesSamplesInterventionOutcomesRef.
Year
HPV Patients with progressed oropharyngeal cancerAccelerated fractionation radiotherapy and standard-fractionation radiotherapyOver 6o percent of patients were HPV-positive and showed better overall survival in 3 years compared to HPV-negative tumors.[31]
2010
HSV-2Patients with acute primary or recurrent HSV-21 g valacyclovir 3 times daily for 1 week,
followed by 0.5 g valaciclovir twice daily for 1 year.
The following-up prescription showed insufficiency in prohibiting recurrent meningitis.[16]
2012
HPVPatients under cervical surgeryThree doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine or placebo at days 1, 60, and 180Quadrivalent HPV vaccination after surgical treatment significantly reduced recurrent HPV-related diseases.[32]
2012
HSV-1 and 2 Patients with HIV-1 and HSV-2Valacyclovir 1000 mg or acyclovir 400 mg twice a week for ~3 monthsHigh-dose valacyclovir was more successful in reducing the plasma HIV-1 RNA levels compared to the standard dose.[33]
2013
HSV-2Patients with HIV and HSV-2 in co-infectionPatients randomly received valacyclovir or placebo (N = 35) The CD4+ T-lymphocyte count or HIV viral load did not change, but asymptomatic HSV-2 shedding reduced slightly.[34]
2014
HSV-1 or HSV-2RCTsEffectiveness of oral antiviral drugs (acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir)Researchers found there was a significantly lower number of patients with at least one genital herpes recurrence when acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir was used to treat patients with at least four recurrences per year as compared with placebo in patients with at least four recurrences.[35]
2014
HPVPatients examined for gingivitisThree medicinal mushrooms: Laetiporus sulphureus, Ganoderma lucidum, and Trametes VersicolorLaetiporus sulphureus exerted 5% oral HPV clearance, while Trametes Versicolor plus Ganoderma lucidum showed a clearance of 88%.[36]
2014
HPV-16 and HPV-18Patients from 36 gynecology practices in seven countries6 mg VGX-3100 or placebo This vaccine is the first to show effectiveness against CIN2/3 associated with HPV-16 and HPV-18 and provides a new treatment outlook.[37]
2015
HSV-2Healthy adults with recurrent genital HSV-2100 mg oral pritelivir with 500 mg valaciclovir once a dayPeople with frequently recurrent genital HSV-2 using pritelivir experienced a lower percentage of HSV+ swabs.[38]
2016
HPVPatients with high-risk cervical HPV infection An anti-HPV biological dressing (JB01-BD)JB01-BD could effectively decrease the viral load.[39]
2016
HSV-1 and 2Patients with post-herpetic neuralgia200 mg or 400 mg valnivudine hydrochloride (FV-100) once daily, or 1000 mg valacyclovir three times dailyTreatment with FV-100 decreased the neuralgia in a dose-dependent manner better than valacyclovir.[40]
2017
HSV-2Adults with symptomatic HSV-230 or 60 µg antigen against glycoprotein D2 and viral transcription factor ICP4.2The GEN-003 vaccine combinations with higher amounts of antigen and adjuvant showed more efficacy.[41]
2018
HSV-2Patients with recurrent genital HSV-2A vaginal capsule of multistrain Lactobacillus brevis or oral acyclovirProbiotic therapy with multi-strain L. brevis was a promising low-cost treatment for recurrent genital herpes simplex virus infection compared with acyclovir.[42]
2018
HPVPatients with multiple common wartsIntramuscular and intralesional bivalent HPV vaccineBoth HPV vaccination roots showed potential for treating warts.[43]
2019
HSV-1Patients with herpetic stromal keratitisTopical cyclosporine-A 2% eye drop with prednisolone acetate 1% eye dropBoth treatments could similarly improve the cornea’s optical density to a significant extent.[44]
2019
HPVPatients with genital condylomatosis Dry extracts of Echinacea purpurea and Elaeagnus angustifolia (HPVADL18®)HPVADL18® was suggested as a potential adjuvant therapy for reducing recurrent lesions after treating genital condylomatosis.[45]
2019
HPVPatients with high-risk HPV A proprietary combination of antiviral biologics (REBACIN®)The antiviral agent could significantly repress the expression of E7 and E6 oncogenes in HPV and clear persistent HPV infections.[46]
2019
HSV-1 and 2HIV-1-positive adults500 mg valaciclovir twice dailyValaciclovir modestly lowered the HIV viral load but did not slow the CD4 count decline.[47]
2019
HPVPatients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis10 mg/kg avelumab every 2 weeks for three dosesAvelumab treatment led to fewer surgical interventions and reduced HPV viral load.[48]
2019
HSV-1Schizophrenic patients with or without HSV-11.5 g valacyclovir or placebo for 16 weeksValacyclovir showed no effect on the viral infection.
HSV-1 infection co-occurred with a more severe form of schizophrenia.
[49]
2019
HSV-1 and 2Patients receiving mechanical ventilation for over 4 days Intravenous acyclovir 5 mg/kgAcyclovir did not decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation and did not increase the number of ventilator-free days in patients with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation.[50]
2019
HPVPatients with anogenital wartsPodophyllotoxin cream 0.15% or imiquimod cream 5% with vaccinationImiquimod and podophyllotoxin creams could similarly clear the wart, but the vaccine benefit was not observed.[51]
2020
Table 2. Recent developments in treating fungal infections.
Table 2. Recent developments in treating fungal infections.
SpeciesSampleInterventionOutcomesRef. Year
C. albicansChildren under treatment with a removable maxillary appliance NitrAdine tabletsThe treatment had no significant effect on the salivary Candida load.[83]
2011
AspergillusPatients with allergic bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis OmalizumabThe treatment was successful in preventing the exacerbation of the infection.[84]
2014
C. albicansAdults living in nursing homesProbiotics, including Lactobacillus reuteri (strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 5289)The probiotics significantly reduced the oral Candida counts.[85]
2015
C. albicansIn vitro study Pomegranate peel extract (PomeGr)The PomeGr treatment altered biofilm formation, fungal growth, and AI release. Moreover, fungal cells substantially reduced PomeGr’s phenolic content[86]
2022
AspergillusPatients with non-dermatophyte mold onychomycosisTraconazole or terbinafineBoth treatment efficacy was non-statistically significant (clinical cure of 54–65%).[87]
2016
AspergillusPatients with suspected invasive mold infectionIntravenous injection of isavuconazonium sulfate or voriconazole followed by further oral administrationIsavuconazole efficacy was not worse than voriconazole. It was well tolerated with fewer adverse events.[88]
2016
C. albicansPatients wearing denturesTriphala churna and chlorhexidine gluconateTriphala showed a more antifungal effect than conventional chlorhexidine.[89]
2017
C. albicansPatients with denture stomatitisLow-molecular-weight chitosan and nystatin Chitosan solution showed a significant antifungal effect.[90]
2017
C. albicansPatients wearing denturesTwo probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus or Lactobacillus rhamnosus) enriched into cheeseThe enriched cheese with probiotics reduced oral Candida colonization.[91]
2017
Candida and Aspergillus Patients with candidemia and invasive candidiasisA member of echinocandins (CD101 IV)The dosing of CD101 IV was safe, minimally accumulative, plasma-persistent, and well-tolerated with negligible renal excretion.[92]
2017
C. albicansPatients with symptomatic oral lichen planus Probiotics, including Lactobacilli reuteriThe probiotic used did not affect the Candida load.[93]
2018
Aspergillus and C. albicansPatients with otomycosis Topical betadine and clotrimazoleThe agents showed similar antifungal potential for treating otomycosis.[94]
2018
AspergillusPatients in the acute stage of allergic bronchopulmonary AspergillosisOral administration of itraconazole or prednisolonePrednisolone induced a better immunologic response but more side effects.[95]
2018
C. albicansPatients with denture stomatitisPhotodynamic inactivation using a diode laser and methylene blueThe inactivation operation reduced the fungal and inflammation levels.[96]
2018
C. albicansPatients with candidemia or invasive candidiasisIntravenous and oral isavuconazole comparedto caspofungin and voriconazole Isavuconazole showed a lower minimal inhibitory concentration than caspofungin.[97]
2019
C. albicansIn vitro studyTissue conditioner modified by chitosan or chitosan-oligosaccharideBoth formulations reduced the C. albicans density.[98]
2019
C. albicansPatients wearing complete dentures with stomatitis Photodynamic therapy using indocyanine green was added to the routine antifungal therapy with nystatin mouthwash aloneThe combined therapy helped to improve the denture stomatitis showing no adverse effects.[99]
2019
S. mutans, C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosisIn vitro studyPropolis, saline, or alkaline peroxide solutionsThe propolis solution had an antimicrobial effect against S. mutans and C. albicans, showing no immediate effect on denture biofilm.[100]
2019
C. albicansPatients wearing removable denturesChitosan-curcuminoid/PEG mouthwash compared to chlorhexidineThe composite alcohol-free mouthwash was a safe topical therapeutic for treating candida-associated denture stomatitis.[101]
2019
AspergillusPatients with chronic pulmonary AspergillosisIntravenous followed by oral administration of itraconazoleThe treatments with itraconazole were effective on chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis.[102]
2019
AspergillusPatients with invasive AspergillosisSingle and multiple ascending intravenous doses of an antifungal drug (VL-2397)The dosing of VL-2397 was safe, non-accumulative, and tolerable in both healthy subjects and patients.[103]
2019
C. albicansPatients wearing dentures with stomatitis Photodynamic inactivation by GaA1As diode laser in comparison with nystatinBoth treatments were equally effective in treating denture stomatitis.[104]
2019
C. albicansPatients wearing maxillary denturesDettol and Lifebuoy liquid soaps compared to sodium hypochlorite and phosphate-buffered saline solution as positive and negative controlsThe liquid soaps efficiently reduced the fungal biofilm.[105]
2020
C. albicansPatients after head and neck radiotherapyProbiotics, including L. acidophilus, B. longum, L. rhamnosus, and S. boulardiiThe probiotic bacteria could effectively reduce the oral Candida load.[106]
2020
AspergillusPatients with otomycosisClotrimazole cream and tolnaftate solutionClotrimazole improved otitis better.[107]
2020
Table 3. Recent developments in treating bacterial infections.
Table 3. Recent developments in treating bacterial infections.
SpeciesSampleInterventionOutcomesRef. Year
S. mutansHealthy subjectsChlorhexidine and garlic extract mouthwashGarlic extract inhibited S. mutans in both in vitro and in vivo studies. [130]
2010
A. gerencseriaePatients with aggressive periodontitisSystemic azithromycinAzithromycin could slightly reduce the subgingival periodontal pathogens[131]
2012
Actinomyces spp.Smoker and non-smoker subjects Metronidazole and AmoxicillinThe non-smokers showed the lowest proportions of the orange complex and a meaningful increase in the proportions of Actinomyces species.[132]
2013
S. mutansChildren with decayed, missing, or filled teethPropolis and xylitol chewing gumsBoth gums reduced the bacterial saliva load suggesting them an anti-cariogenic agent.[133]
2014
Lactobacillus spp.
Actinomyces naeslundii
S. mutans
Healthy adult subjectsBeverages containing apple fiber and polyphenols from boysenberryThe apple-boysenberry beverage exerted the most reduction on the colonization and biofilm adhesion.[134]
2017
S. mutansAdolescent subjects with disabilitiesXylitol gumThe xylitol gum significantly reduced the caries rate.[73]
2017
S. mutansYoung subjectsMouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, xylitol, and chlorhexidine + xylitolAll mouthwashes effectively reduced plaque, gingivitis, and bacterial saliva level.[135]
2017
S. pseudopneumoniae
A. odontolyticus
Adults with bronchiectasisErythromycinThe intervention significantly decreased the oropharyngeal microbiota composition.[136]
2018
A. actinomycetemcomitans
A. naeslundii
A. viscosus
E. faecalis
E. coli
L. casei
S. oralis
S. sanguinis
C. albicans
In vitro studySeveral flavonoidsAmong the eight tested flavonoids, morin was the most effective; however other four flavonoids, including luteolin, naringin, quercetin, and rutin, could also decrease bacterial and fungal growth.[137]
2019
A. israelii
E. faecium
F. nucleatum
L. gasseri
S. mutans
V. parvula
In vitro studyCurcumin, protoporphyrin IX, resazurin, riboflavin, and light irradiationAll tested agents decreased the oral bacterial growth.[138]
2019
E. faecalis
S. gordonii
A. naeslundii
L. acidophilus
In vitro studyDimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMADDM) and EndoREZThe two tested sealers showed similar cytotoxicity, apical sealing ability, and solubility; however, DMADDM showed different properties at a mass fraction of 5%.[139]
2019
S. oralis
A. naeslundii
V. parvula
F. nucleatum
P. gingivalis
A. actinomycetemcomitans
In vitro studyRed wine, dealcoholized red wine, polyphenols-rich extracts from wine, and polyphenols-rich extracts from grape seedsConventional and dealcoholized red wine reduced the bacteria load within the biofilm, especially about P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans.[140]
2019
S. mutans
A. naeslundii
In vitro studySurface pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler in a resin-based composite incorporated with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholineThe polymer added in the filler composite inhibited bacterial attachment and biofilm growth.[141]
2019
A. naeslundii
E. faecalis
Extracted single-rooted human mandibular first premolarsPlatelet-rich fibrin scaffold with or without a 3-antibiotic mixture containing minocycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacinThe combination of scaffold and antibiotic mixture showed the highest antibacterial activity.[142]
2020
S. mutans
L. casei
A. naeslundii
Human mandibular third molarsDiode laser and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solutionAll three cariogenic bacteria were affected by a diode. [143]
2020
S. oralis
A. naeslundii
V. parvula
F. nucleatum
P. gingivalis
A. actinomycetemcomitans
In vitro study in a subgingival biofilm modelDoxycycline, zinc, and calcium doped polymeric nanostructured membrane that is non-resorbableThe nanostructured membrane significantly reduced the biofilm growth dynamics and bacterial load.[144]
2020
S. mutans
S. gordonii
S. sobrinus
A. naeslundii
F. nucleatum
A. actinomycetemcomitans
P. gingivalis
E. faecalis
In vitro study in planktonic cultureFruit juices derived from blackcurrant, redcurrant, cranberry, and raspberryBlackcurrant, redcurrant, and cranberry juices had the most suppressing effect on bacterial growth, respectively, while raspberry only significantly suppressed the growth of P. gingivalis.[53]
2020
S. mutansIn vitro study on extracted teeth A composite of nano-calcium fluoride and dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylateThe composite showed promising fluoride release features and antibacterial functions.[145]
2020
E. faecalis
S. mutans
A. israelii
In vitro studyThree licorice-derived polyphenols and cinnamon oilThe tested natural plant-derived compounds showed promising root canal disinfection properties.[146]
2020
S. mutans
S. sobrinus
A. viscosus
L. acidophilus
In vitro study Caffeic acid phenethyl esterThe tested agent exerted high bactericidal and inhibitory activities against biofilms, cariogenic bacteria, and their virulence.[147]
2020
S. mutans
A. naeslundii
Human dentin blocks
Periodontitis animal model
Surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer nanofillersThe tested nanofiller coating showed antibacterial effects on the tooth surfaces and improved the clinical parameters of periodontitis.[148]
2021
S. sanguinisIn vitro study The concentration of H2O2 It has been shown that S. sanguinis evades neutrophil killing in vitro and counteracts innate immunity by the action of SpxB in collected blood[149]
2017
S. salivariusInduced oral mucositis by experimental radiation in miceThe mouse oral cavity was treated daily with S. salivarius K12Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy may benefit from S. salivarius K12 as an adjuvant treatment.[150]
2021
S. salivariusPrimary human gingival fibroblastsPathogen-induced fibroblasts were treated with S. salivarius M18K12, K12, and fractions of its supernatant and whole-cell lysatePeriodontal disease pathogens were prevented from activating the immune system by S.salivarius M18 and K12. After chewing gum was administered with S. salivarius K12, the salivary microbiome and immune system did not change. [151]
2021
S. sanguinisIn vitro studyMeasurement of SsaACB manganese transporterIn acidic conditions, SK36 mutants lacking SsaACB display reduced growth and manganese uptake. S. sanguinis may have a variety of manganese transporters due to the heterogeneity of its oral environment.[152]
2022
C. albicans, S. aureus and P. aeruginosaIn vitro study Pomegranate (PomeGr) and microRepair (MicroR)There were similarities in the effects of MicroR and PomeGr; however, the effectiveness of the two, given separately or in combination, varied based on which microbial agent was being treated.[153] 2022
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tahmasebi, E.; Keshvad, A.; Alam, M.; Abbasi, K.; Rahimi, S.; Nouri, F.; Yazdanian, M.; Tebyaniyan, H.; Heboyan, A.; Fernandes, G.V.O. Current Infections of the Orofacial Region: Treatment, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology. Life 2023, 13, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020269

AMA Style

Tahmasebi E, Keshvad A, Alam M, Abbasi K, Rahimi S, Nouri F, Yazdanian M, Tebyaniyan H, Heboyan A, Fernandes GVO. Current Infections of the Orofacial Region: Treatment, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology. Life. 2023; 13(2):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tahmasebi, Elahe, Ali Keshvad, Mostafa Alam, Kamyar Abbasi, Saeide Rahimi, Farzad Nouri, Mohsen Yazdanian, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Artak Heboyan, and Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes. 2023. "Current Infections of the Orofacial Region: Treatment, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology" Life 13, no. 2: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop