Skip to Content
MachinesMachines
  • Review
  • Open Access

19 October 2017

Rotating Electrical Machine Condition Monitoring Automation—A Review

,
,
and
1
KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
2
ABB Power Generation, Wickliffe, OH 44092, USA
3
ABB Corporate Research, 721 78 Västerås, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

We review existing machine condition monitoring techniques and industrial automation for plant-wide condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines. Cost and complexity of a condition monitoring system increase with the number of measurements, so extensive condition monitoring is currently mainly restricted to the situations where the consequences of poor availability, yield or quality are so severe that they clearly justify the investment in monitoring. There are challenges to obtaining plant-wide monitoring that includes even small machines and non-critical applications. One of the major inhibiting factors is the ratio of condition monitoring cost to equipment cost, which is crucial to the acceptance of using monitoring to guide maintenance for a large fleet of electrical machinery. Ongoing developments in sensing, communication and computation for industrial automation may greatly extend the set of machines for which extensive monitoring is viable.

1. Introduction

Condition Monitoring (CM) is a process of acquiring equipment health status and predicting the operational ability of a system in a given environment: the health of the system is evaluated during its operation, and possible failures associated with it are recognized at an early stage. Motivations for condition monitoring (CM) in industrial automation include reductions in downtime, maintenance activity and related faults, and increases in energy efficiency, yield, and quality. Predictive diagnostics based on CM permit a well-informed plant maintenance activity. Condition based maintenance (CBM) using the equipment condition assessment has several benefits as compared to scheduled cyclic or reactive plant maintenance, mainly in terms of reduced downtime and replacement cost [1]. The methods used in system health assessment depend on plant infrastructure, operational criticality, process work flow, and ease of repair and service. A cost effective CBM can in some cases be achieved even with low cost condition monitoring equipment, for example by statistical treatment to reduce false positives and negatives in spite of the uncertainty of measurements or fault-trigger thresholds [2]. The success of CBM depends on the overall cost of the condition monitoring system in a plant, its arrangement, and on the relative benefits compared to the operation and maintenance costs over the life of the plant.
The infrastructure chain in the power and process industries commonly has power generation, substation, power distribution, process control and plant operation equipment. Most of these subsystems are integrated with the distributed control system (DCS) and can publish their health status periodically for predictive diagnostics. The successful deployment of condition monitoring in process and power industries also relies upon the combined analysis of interrelated elements, such as structural, stochastic, resource, economic, etc, [3]. Generators, motors, turbines, and other rotating electrical machines are usually distributed in large numbers across the plant. The monitoring of the distributed rotating electrical machines such as smart motors sending fault information wirelessly may demand modification of the legacy CM practices. This paper reviews the traditional condition monitoring techniques, recent activities, and deployment of the intelligent machines in an industrial automation system. It covers the evolution and recent trends regarding rotating electrical machines, as well as deployment use case for plant-wide operations and future directions.

2. Machine Condition Monitoring: An Evolution

One of the first references to machine condition monitoring can be found in 1924 by Walker [4], who proposed a measurement system that used data and theoretically based analysis for diagnosis of motor faults. Vibration analysis for machine diagnosis started about 1950 [5], with accelerometers proposed in place of magnetic velocity pickup, besides development of vibration and temperature pick-ups, spectrum analysis, and computer-based diagnostic applications. Another important proposal was to use non-contacting vibration pick-ups: non-contact sensors for condition monitoring applications proposed during this period did not gain popularity due to technical limitations of sensors, cabling, and data acquisition electronics [5]. Partial discharge (PD) measurements have been widely used to detect insulation faults in machines above the low-voltage level. These have been correlated with types of insulation degradation for early warning of developing problems [6]. During the 1980s, Timperley showed that a combination of ‘electromagnetic interference’ measured at the neutral of an operating machine, together with wideband spectrum analysis, can provide significant diagnostic information with long lead time before complete failure [7].
The importance of monitoring systems that operate without shutdown of the machine (i.e., online) was further emphasized in [8], in which the benefits of daily monitoring of machines are shown through radio frequency (RF) measurements at the machine neutral using permanently installed RF sensors. The maturity of adjacent technologies during 2000 to 2010 in the area of sensing, digital data acquisition and integration of communication equipment has shown the increasing viability of continuous monitoring. The practitioners have made an effort to prove that the continuous diagnostics with real-time update of the plant-wide machine condition increases business profit through informed maintenance and service decisions [9,10]. The development of an integrated system prompted industries to use condition based maintenance through continuous assessment of equipment health across the plant. During the past three decades, there has been a steady growth in machine condition monitoring technologies owing to its importance concerning plant safety and mission criticality. Monitoring methods have been matured giving raise to the adaptation of reliable CM systems for fault prediction, detection, and fault location identification for various types of rotating machines in the plant’s system critical chain.
Long service life, low cost, and useful fault indication are some of the most important aspects for the evolution of condition monitoring systems. The driving factors for this evolution are as given below:
  • Efficient maintenance and reliable operation: accurate detection of incipient faults with sufficient lead time; thus, evolutions of health monitoring technologies are motivated by the increased productivity and/or reduced investments for maintenance.
  • Maximized overall profitability: the monitoring technologies should have a low cost, to the point where further reduction would deteriorate the monitoring quality significantly.
  • A sustainable business based on reliable monitoring systems whose service life equals that of the monitored equipment and at the same time offers lower total operating cost.
Figure 1 shows the condition monitoring technology trends that evolved over the years aligning to the plant life cycle functions. The plant life cycle can have five most important phases: (i) maintenance and service plans for developing the case for the use of condition monitoring in the plant; (ii) commissioning to deploy the monitoring applications; (iii) engineering to configure the system elements; (iv) plant operations for setting the human–machine interface (HMI) views, thresholds, and generating actions for maintenance, and (v) maintenance and service activities for keeping the main stream equipment in healthy conditions for its long and precise working [11].
Figure 1. Technology trends, plant life cycle and monitoring system evolution.
Each phase has its technical challenges for employing condition monitoring solutions for rotating electrical machines. The planning phase deals with selection of the monitoring and the diagnostic applications based on the customer end use requirements. The rotating machine diagnostic applications are largely focused on detection of bearing and insulation failures using thermal, vibration, acoustic, magnetic, and partial discharge sensors. Identification of the correct sensor combination and corresponding diagnostic algorithms that can completely meet the end use application is one of the biggest challenges. The survey conducted addresses the steady growth that has been established in diagnostic algorithms and associated elements in areas of the rotating machine monitoring. The related challenges associated with these elements, such as sensor mounting and compensation, data acquisition, computation capability, etc., are assessed with regard to condition monitoring applications. For example, micro electro-mechanical sensors (MEMS) may bring down the costs, provided they exhibit long-term stability and reliable functioning throughout the service life of the equipment. During commissioning, it is vital to have a convenient setup for the hardware and software: this includes the installation of a measurement system that consists of sensors, sensor mount, data acquisition units, a communication unit, etc. The system configuration and architecture influence the monitoring cost per point. Hence, it is necessary to optimize the measurement, communication, and distribution of processing algorithm at various levels, in order to meet the monitoring application specifications [12,13]. The engineering phase is mainly related to configuring the system for its functionality; the greatest challenge is getting unified tools that can work along with the automation system native tools. Operation related activities are mainly related to maintaining the condition monitoring system, performing information acquisition, and running the diagnostics expert system for fault predictions. This system continuously updates the information related to early failures during the plant operations [14].
Condition based maintenance (CBM) in industrial automation has evolved to achieve reduction of maintenance effort and time. The challenges are the optimization of maintenance work flow, information system, timely maintenance, and equipment service. Various elements within the maintenance process are shown in Figure 2. The process optimization includes minimizing the activities associated with managing the measurement system, information system and maintenance work flow. It is also necessary to reduce time between a maintenance trigger and equipment service or repair or replacement, which is efficient enough to justify the condition monitoring investments [15].
Figure 2. Condition based plant maintenance process.
Business models for condition monitoring evolved from a selective equipment monitoring to plant-wide diagnostics of all the dependent subsystems, i.e., a fleet of machines across the plant. The decision of using a condition monitoring system in the plant is mostly based on the trade-off between the risks associated with equipment failure and number of check points [16]. Recent trends show integration of monitoring functions with process control, leading to the development of suitable platforms, in particular smart sensors and related application software.
Figure 3 represents a typical process flow diagram for the plant-wide machine monitoring system. This type of deployment needs multi-point measurement, changing the economic scale of sensors required for machine condition monitoring. If the monitored device is in the critical chain, then the decision to employ health monitoring could be easy; if not, cost per monitoring point needs to be justified concerning business returns associated with machine maintenance, service revenue, product quality, and yield [17].
Figure 3. Condition based maintenance for plant-wide fleet monitoring.

4. Plant-Wide Condition Monitoring

A typical deployment of a condition monitoring system consists of data acquisition (DAQ) unit, a local processing unit constantly communicating with the analytics [60]. Even though various advanced diagnostic methods like signature based techniques for the analysis of stator current and vibration signals are available in the literature, real life implementations of such methods are not numerous. The main reason is the overall commissioning and installation costs. Each DAQ unit is able to support a limited number of diagnostic algorithms and, therefore, in order to achieve a thorough plant condition monitoring, many units are required together with specialized sensors connected by means of proper cables and communication protocols [61]. Since DAQs are high performing and thus expensive, deployment cost rises significantly. The accuracy reached by these units in terms of condition monitoring is satisfactory, but, on the other hand, it is not sufficient to justify such high investment cost.
Therefore, the tendency is to monitor only a subset of the machines, and only very few physical parameters are tracked due to cost constraints. Needless to say, more economical solutions monitoring all machines’ parameters are desirable. Even though cost reduction and plant-wide machine monitoring seem to go in opposite directions, with the use of latest low cost technology developments, it is possible to satisfy both of them [17]. In fact, low cost devices integrated with monitored machines can be built: they are miniaturized and more computationally powerful versions of the previous DAQ units, implementing various diagnostic algorithms at the same time and relying on board-integrated sensors. Clearly, these monitoring devices are significantly cheaper and can be mounted on the entire machine fleet without relevant economic impact. Unlike DAQs, each of them can track many machine parameters: this may result in reduced monitoring accuracy, since low cost technology may not be high performing, but the lower accuracy may be compensated by the overall plant overview given by machine fleet monitoring. The new integrated devices are able to perform first level analytics on retrieved data, but, in order to achieve deeper inference, constant communication with the remote service monitoring unit is required. Such communication needs to be standard-regulated, since various monitoring devices will be connected; even more importantly, it must meet the real-time requirements. Hence, it is necessary to adopt an integrated approach when we build the deployment architecture: distributed resource sharing, algorithms fusion and computational optimization are the key elements to consider along with the use of low-cost sensing, communication and computation devices.
The literature shows the implementation of intellectual property (IP) cores to enable hardware implementation of diagnostic algorithms [62], but they are not still practical yet. Smart sensor development and low cost continuous monitoring are ongoing research activities: the intended outcome is to offer low-cost, accurate and reliable monitoring sensors [63]. Some of the early work related to modelling and sensing are addressed [64,65,66]. The most recent development of plant-wide condition monitoring is the use of MEMS based smart sensors and low cost continuous monitoring system, for example: integrated sensing (vibration, temperature, acoustic, and magnetic sensors), communication, and a processing unit embedded with the motor. However, the remaining challenge is combining the state-of-the-art diagnostic algorithms in low cost computing platforms. The hardware platform using field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) seems to be promising, although not matured. A more elaborate research for the incipient detection of multiple faults along with an FPGA based implementation is presented in [67]. It employs the paradigm of information entropy and fuzzy logic. Again, these platforms have to be evaluated for their power consumption, footprint, etc., to make them usable for plant-wide monitoring.
Even though, to a good extent, the deployment of the CM system for individual machines might get duplicated in a meaningful manner, there are exceptions. The main areas of investigation for cost effective plant-wide condition monitoring are:
  • Integration of sensing, computing and communication,
  • Integrated monitoring, maintenance and service,
  • Reliability and failure prediction performance,
  • Shared and distributed platform, reduced overall cost per monitoring point.
In the process industry, a condition monitoring system is typically deployed along with the assessment of the risk associated with machine failure [68]. A common plant-wide automation system consists of hierarchically distributed monitoring modules, which are either integrated or embedded within the machines and are interconnected using wired or wireless industrial communication protocols. The information collected by diagnostic sensors is decomposed in order to be processed stepwise. Locally acquired data, such as vibration data from the device accelerometers, are first processed by the embedded device. Then, this processed information is sent to the plant controller or on-premise analytics operations. The information shared with other devices and/or controllers and/or analytics may get processed at each of these stages, enabling computation and communication load distribution. Afterwards, such processed information or objects are gradually aggregated and eventually used in decision support system or Service Intelligence Unit (SIU). The SIU, in turn, aggregates information or objects related to all the machines of the plant to perform overall predictive analysis.
The plant-wide deployment can be carried out using different architectures. Information flow and computation allocation are scheduled using a CM configuration engineering tool. Figure 5 shows a typical deployment using smart sensors. It usually includes an engineering tool, an on-premise operation server, a cloud enabled service or a remote service intelligence unit to support the embedded monitoring of plant-wide equipment. These monitoring devices are connected either to an input-output (IO) network or to a control network belonging to automation hierarchy. Furthermore, the information flow is established using a suitable standard communication protocols. Engineering tools are used to configure the monitoring devices embedded in the monitored equipment. An instance of these smart sensors together with an association to the respective monitored machine is created [69]. Configuration information is shared among all the devices of the automation system, including controllers, operation servers, etc. This common configuration is further used in the analytics to develop the predictive diagnostics associated with these individually monitored machines. The SIU further integrates this information for generating the predictive diagnostics and maintenance report across the connected plants.
Figure 5. Plant-wide fleet condition monitoring.
The communication and processing requirements depend on the diagnostic application itself, its parameters and the number of machines being monitored in the plant. The recent advances in big data analytics help in handling the large amount of data and processing load. In general, a selected combination of application, sensors information, and maintenance activities are integrated in the service intelligence unit [70]. Several organizations have already matured smart condition monitoring for the entire fleet of machines in a plant, such as smart sensor solutions for plant-wide low voltage motor monitoring.

5. Conclusions

Condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines has evolved with the advent of sensing, machine diagnostic methods, data analytics platforms, communication and information management. Developments in these technologies now give a fresh opportunity to obtain automation and monitoring systems suited to diverse plant deployment scenarios that would not previously have been possible. The paper reviews the deployment methods in practice that allow integration of monitoring system on premise, on cloud, and even rogue internet of things (IOT) devices in industrial automation systems. The reviewed methods and techniques may need further analysis for adjacent technologies related to security. The security-enhanced, low-cost, and large-scale deployment is key to a future condition monitoring automation system for rotating electrical machines.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank ABB., particularly Marco Sanguineti for the support and related discussions. Authors fully acknowledge the useful discussions with ABB colleagues Cajetan T.Pinto, Christopher Ganz, Stefan U. Svensson, and B S Nagabhushana from BMS college of Engineering, Bangalore.

Author Contributions

Mallikarjun Kande performed the literature review, wrote most of the text, and composed the diagrams. Alf J. Isaksson and Rajeev Thottappillil gave suggestions and guidance through project meetings, other discussion and proofreading. Nathaniel Taylor guided the work in regular meetings, and wrote or edited some parts of the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kohler, J.L.; Sottile, J.; Trutt, F.C. Condition-based maintenance of electrical machines. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 3–7 October 1999; Volume 1, pp. 205–211. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bram de Jonge, R.T.; Tinga, T. The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2017, 158, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Minou, C.A.; Olde Keizer, S.D.P.F.; Teunter, R.H. Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 261, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Walker, M. The Diagnosing of Troubles in Electrical Machines; Longmans Green and Co.: Harlow, UK, 1921; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Foster, G.B. Recent Developments in Machine Vibration Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ind. Gen. Appl. 1967, IGA-3, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kurtz, M.; Stone, G.C. Partial discharge testing of generator insulation. In Proceedings of the 1978 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Insulation, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 12–14 June 1978; pp. 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  7. Timperley, J.E. Incipient Fault Identification Through Neutral RF Monitoring of Large Rotating Machines. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1983, PAS-102, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harrold, R.T.; Emery, F.T. Radio Frequency Diagnostic Monitoring of Electrical Machines. IEEE Electr. Insulation Mag. 1986, 2, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kwan, C.; Ayhan, B.; Yin, J.; Liu, X.; Ballal, P.; Athamneh, A.; Ramani, A.; Lee, W.; Lewis, F. Real-time system condition monitoring using wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 7–14 March 2009; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Amaro, J.P.; Ferreira, F.J.T.E.; Cortesão, R.; Vinagre, N.; Bras, R.P. Low cost wireless sensor network for in-field operation monitoring of induction motors. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Vina del Mar, Chile, 14–17 March 2010; pp. 1044–1049. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bratthall, L.G.; van der Geest, R.; Hofmann, H.; Jellum, E.; Korendo, Z.; Martinez, R.; Orkisz, M.; Zeidler, C.; Andersson, J.S. Integrating hundred’s of products through one architecture—The industrial IT architecture. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2002), Orlando, FL, USA, 19–25 May 2002; pp. 604–614. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolacinski, R.M.; Theeranaew, W.; Loparo, K.A. An information-theoretic architecture for advanced condition monitoring and control of power generating plants. In Proceedings of the 2012 Future of Instrumentation International Workshop (FIIW), Gatlinburg, TN, USA, 8–9 October 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vasel, J. One plant, one system: Benefits of integrating process and power automation. In Proceedings of the 65th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers, College Station, TX, USA, 2–5 April 2012; pp. 215–250. [Google Scholar]
  14. Loutfi, M.Y. Online condition monitoring network for critical equipment at Holcim’s STE. genevieve plant. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE-IAS/PCA 53rd Cement Industry Technical Conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 22–26 May 2011; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  15. Simon, C.; Theilliol, D.; Sauter, D.; Orkisz, M. Remaining useful life assessment via residual generator approach—A SOH virtual sensor concept. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Antibes/Nice, France, 8–10 October 2014; pp. 1202–1207. [Google Scholar]
  16. Abu-Rub, H.; Bayhan, S.; Moinoddin, S.; Malinowski, M.; Guzinski, J. Medium-Voltage Drives: Challenges and existing technology. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2016, 3, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orkisz, M.; Wnek, M.; Kryczka, K.; Joerg, P. Variable frequency drive as a source of condition monitoring data. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Ischia, Italy, 11–13 June 2008; pp. 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  18. Han, Y.; Song, Y.H. Condition monitoring techniques for electrical equipment—A literature survey. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2003, 18, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonnett, A.H.; Soukup, G.C. Rotor Failures in Squirrel Cage Induction Motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1986, IA-22, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Milimonfared, J.; Kelk, H.M.; Nandi, S.; Minassians, A.D.; Toliyat, H.A. A novel approach for broken-rotor-bar detection in cage induction motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1999, 35, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benbouzid, M.E.H.; Kliman, G.B. What stator current processing-based technique to use for induction motor rotor faults diagnosis? IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2003, 18, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nandi, S.; Toliyat, H.A.; Li, X. Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical motors—A review. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2005, 20, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eltabach, M.; Charara, A.; Zein, I. A comparison of external and internal methods of signal spectral analysis for broken rotor bars detection in induction motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2004, 51, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kliman, G.B.; Koegl, R.A.; Stein, J.; Endicott, R.D.; Madden, M.W. Noninvasive detection of broken rotor bars in operating induction motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 1988, 3, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Filippetti, F.; Franceschini, G.; Tassoni, C.; Vas, P. Recent developments of induction motor drives fault diagnosis using AI techniques. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2000, 47, 994–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kia, S.H.; Henao, H.; Capolino, G.A. A High-Resolution Frequency Estimation Method for Three-Phase Induction Machine Fault Detection. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2007, 54, 2305–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bellini, A.; Filippetti, F.; Franceschini, G.; Tassoni, C.; Kliman, G.B. Quantitative evaluation of induction motor broken bars by means of electrical signature analysis. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2001, 37, 1248–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arthur, N.; Penman, J. Induction machine condition monitoring with higher order spectra. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2000, 47, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jung, J.H.; Lee, J.J.; Kwon, B.H. Online Diagnosis of Induction Motors Using MCSA. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2006, 53, 1842–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bellini, A. Quad Demodulation: A Time-Domain Diagnostic Method for Induction Machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2009, 45, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ayhan, B.; Chow, M.Y.; Song, M.H. Multiple Discriminant Analysis and Neural-Network-Based Monolith and Partition Fault-Detection Schemes for Broken Rotor Bar in Induction Motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2006, 53, 1298–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Su, H.; Chong, K.T. Induction Machine Condition Monitoring Using Neural Network Modeling. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2007, 54, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bazine, I.B.A.; Tnani, S.; Poinot, T.; Champenois, G.; Jelassi, K. On-line detection of stator and rotor faults occurring in induction machine diagnosis by parameters estimation. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics Drives, Bologna, Italy, 5–8 September 2011; pp. 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kral, C.; Wieser, R.S.; Pirker, F.; Schagginger, M. Sequences of field-oriented control for the detection of faulty rotor bars in induction machines-the Vienna Monitoring Method. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2000, 47, 1042–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cardoso, A.J.M.; Cruz, S.M.A.; Carvalho, J.F.S.; Saraiva, E.S. Rotor cage fault diagnosis in three-phase induction motors, by Park’s vector approach. In Proceedings of the Industry Applications Conference, Thirtieth IAS Annual Meeting, IAS ’95, Conference Record of the 1995 IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 October 1995; Volume 1, pp. 642–646. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aboubou, A.; Sahraoui, M.; Zouzou, S.E.; Razik, H.; Rezzoug, A. Broken bars and/or end rings detection in three-phase induction motors by the extended Park’s vector approach. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Power Electronics Congress (CIEP 2004), Celaya, Gto., Mexico, 17–22 October 2004; pp. 128–133. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zagirnyak, M.; Mamchur, D.; Kalinov, A. Induction motor diagnostic system based on spectra analysis of current and instantaneous power signals. In Proceedings of the IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2014, Lexington, KY, USA, 13–16 March 2014; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  38. Drif, M.; Cardoso, A.J.M. The instantaneous power factor approach for rotor cage faults diagnosis in three-phase induction motors. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Ischia, Italy, 11–13 June 2008; pp. 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  39. Drif, M.; Cardoso, A.J.M. Stator Fault Diagnostics in Squirrel Cage Three-Phase Induction Motor Drives Using the Instantaneous Active and Reactive Power Signature Analyses. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 1348–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bell, R.N.; Mcwilliams, D.W.; O’Donnell, P.; Singh, C.; Wells, S.J. Report of Large Motor Reliability Survey of Industrial and Commercial Installations, Part I. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1985, IA-21, 853–864. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bell, R.N.; Heising, C.R.; O’Donnell, P.; Singh, C.; Wells, S.J. Report of Large Motor Reliability Survey of Industrial and Commercial Installations, Part II. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1985, IA-21, 865–872. [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Donnell, P.; Heising, C.; Singh, C.; Wells, S.J. Report of Large Motor Reliability Survey of Industrial and Commercial Installations: Part 3. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1987, IA-23, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thorsen, O.V.; Dalva, M. A survey of faults on induction motors in offshore oil industry, petrochemical industry, gas terminals, and oil refineries. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1995, 31, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Siddique, A.; Yadava, G.S.; Singh, B. A review of stator fault monitoring techniques of induction motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2005, 20, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Orman, M.; Orkisz, M.; Pinto, C.T. Slip estimation of a large induction machine based on MCSA. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics Drives, Bologna, Italy, 5–8 September 2011; pp. 568–572. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yazici, B.; Kliman, G.B. An adaptive statistical time-frequency method for detection of broken bars and bearing faults in motors using stator current. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1999, 35, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garcia-Perez, A.; de Jesus Romero-Troncoso, R.; Cabal-Yepez, E.; Osornio-Rios, R.A. The Application of High-Resolution Spectral Analysis for Identifying Multiple Combined Faults in Induction Motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 2002–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vetterli, M.; Herley, C. Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and design. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1992, 40, 2207–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Burnett, R.; Watson, J.F.; Elder, S. The application of modern signal processing techniques to rotor fault detection and location within three phase induction motors. In Proceedings of the Integrating Intelligent Instrumentation and Control Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC/95.), Waltham, MA, USA, 23–26 April 1995. [Google Scholar]
  50. Eren, L.; Devaney, M.J. Motor bearing damage detection via wavelet analysis of the starting current transient. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC 2001), Budapest, Hungary, 21–23 May 2001; Volume 3, pp. 1797–1800. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rajagopalan, S.; Aller, J.M.; Restrepo, J.A.; Habetler, T.G.; Harley, R.G. Analytic-Wavelet-Ridge-Based Detection of Dynamic Eccentricity in Brushless Direct Current (BLDC) Motors Functioning Under Dynamic Operating Conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2007, 54, 1410–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. CusidÓCusido, J.; Romeral, L.; Ortega, J.A.; Rosero, J.A.; Espinosa, A.G. Fault Detection in Induction Machines Using Power Spectral Density in Wavelet Decomposition. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2008, 55, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gu, F.; Wang, T.; Alwodai, A.; Tian, X.; Shao, Y.; Ball, A. A new method of accurate broken rotor bar diagnosis based on modulation signal bispectrum analysis of motor current signals. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2015, 50, 400–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ngote, N.; Guedira, S.; Ouassaid, M.; Cherkaoui, M. Comparison of wavelet-functions for induction-motor rotor fault detection based on the hybrid Time Synchronous Averaging—Discrete Wavelet Transform approach. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies (ICEIT), Marrakech, Morocco, 25–27 March 2015; pp. 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  55. Soualhi, A.; Clerc, G.; Razik, H. Detection and Diagnosis of Faults in Induction Motor Using an Improved Artificial Ant Clustering Technique. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 4053–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, S.; Chow, T.W.S. Induction machine fault detection using SOM-based RBF neural networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2004, 51, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Escamilla-Ambrosio, P.J.; Liu, X.; Lieven, N.A.J.; Ramírez-Cortés, J.M. Wavelet-fuzzy logic approach to structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, El Paso, TX, USA, 18–20 March 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhong, J.; Yang, Z.; Wong, S.F. Machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis based on support vector machine. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Macao, China, 7–10 December 2010; pp. 2228–2233. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sun, L.; Liu, M.; Qian, H.; Qiao, C. A New Method to Mechanical Fault Classification with Support Vector Machine. In Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Conference on Digital Manufacturing Automation, Hunan, China, 5–7 August 2011; pp. 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sheng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Lu, Y. Development and application of condition monitoring system for plant production. In Proceedings of the 24th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Taiyuan, China, 23–25 May 2012; pp. 2490–2493. [Google Scholar]
  61. Cardoso, F.J.A.; Faria, S.P.S.; Oliveira, J.E.G. A smart sensor for the condition monitoring of industrial rotating machinery. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Sensors, Taipei, Taiwan, 28–31 October 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cabal-Yepez, E.; Osornio-Rios, R.A.; Romero-Troncoso, R.J.; Razo-Hernandez, J.R.; Lopez-Garcia, R. FPGA-Based Online Induction Motor Multiple-Fault Detection with Fused FFT and Wavelet Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs, Quintana Roo, Mexico, 9–11 December 2009; pp. 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wildermuth, S.; Ahrend, U.; Byner, C.; Rzeszucinski, P.; Lewandowski, D.; Orman, M. Condition monitoring of electric motors based on magnetometer measurements. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA), Luxembourg, 8–11 September 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  64. Stein, J.L.; Park, Y. Modeling and Sensing Issues for Machine Diagnostics. In Proceedings of the 1988 American Control Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 June 1988; pp. 1924–1930. [Google Scholar]
  65. Su, C.Q. Smart condition monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 8–11 June 2014; pp. 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zygmunt, M.; Budyn, M.; Orkisz, M.; Ottewill, J.; Jaramillo, V.; Nowak, A. Visual modeling of condition monitoring systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA 2012), Krakow, Poland, 17–21 September 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  67. Romero-Troncoso, R.J.; Saucedo-Gallaga, R.; Cabal-Yepez, E.; Garcia-Perez, A.; Osornio-Rios, R.A.; Alvarez-Salas, R.; Miranda-Vidales, H.; Huber, N. FPGA-Based Online Detection of Multiple Combined Faults in Induction Motors Through Information Entropy and Fuzzy Inference. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 5263–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wasif, H.; Aboutalebi, A.; Brown, D.; Axel-Berg, L. Condition monitoring system for process industries a business approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications, Bandung, Indonesia, 23–26 September 2012; pp. 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  69. Josifovic, A.; Corney, J. Development of industrial process characterisation through data analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Athens, Greece, 6–9 December 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu, B.; Kumar, S.A. Big Data Analytics Framework for System Health Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, New York, NY, USA, 27 June–2 July 2015; pp. 401–408. [Google Scholar]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.