Abstract
In the theory of generalized hypergeometric functions, classical summation theorems for the series , , , and play a key role. Very recently, Masjed-Jamei and Koepf established generalizations of the above-mentioned summation theorems. Inspired by their work, the main objective of the paper is to provide a new class of Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric functions for and 7 in the most general forms. Several new and known cases have also been obtained as special cases of our main findings.
Keywords:
generalized hypergeometric functions; classical summation theorems; generalization; laplace transforms MSC:
33C20; 33C05; 33C90
1. Introduction
The generalized hypergeometric function with p numerator and q denominator parameters is defined [1,2,3,4] as
in which no denominator parameters is allowed to be zero or a negative integer. If any numerator parameter in Equation (1) is zero or a negative integer, the series terminates.
In addition, here, is the well known Pochhammer symbol [5] for any complex number a defined as
where is the well known gamma function defined by
for .
Further, application of the ratio test shows that the series in Equation (1):
- (i)
- converges for all finite z if ;
- (ii)
- converges for if ; and
- (iii)
- diverges for all z if .
In addition, following Bromwich [6] (p. 41 and 241), Knopp [7] (p. 401) or Luke [8], it can be shown that the series is
- (i)
- absolutely convergent for if ;
- (ii)
- conditionally convergent for , if ; and
- (iii)
- divergent for if , where
It is not out of place to mention here that, whenever a generalized hypergeometric function reduces to products and quotients of gamma functions, the results are very useful from the point of view of applications. For and 7 of the generalized hypergeometric function in Equation (1) with proper choice of parameters, the results in the form of summation theorems are available in the literature in terms of gamma function. However, for , we do not have any summation theorem available. Thus, in this paper, we do not consider the case for . Here, we mention the following classical summation theorems [1,2], so that the paper may be self contained.
- Gauss Theorem for
- Kummer’s Theorem
- Second Gauss Theorem
- Bailey’s Theorem
- Dixon’s Theorem for
- Watson’s Theorem for
- Whipple’s Theorem for
- Pfaff-Saalschütz Theorem
- Second Whipple’s Theorem
- Dougall’s Theorem for
- Second Dougall’s Theorem
For very interesting applications of some of the above-mentioned classical summation theorems, we refer a very popular and useful paper by Bailey [9].
In addition, for finite sums of hypergeometric series, if we use the following symbol
where, for instance,
then, by using the following relation [10],
very recently Masjed-Jamei and Koepf [11] established generalizations of the classical summation theorems in Equations (4)–(14) in the following form:
Remark 1.
On the other hand, we define the (direct) Laplace transform of a function of a real variable t as the integral over a range of the complex parameter s as
provided the integral exists in the Lebesgue sense. For more details, see, for instance, the works of [17] or [18]. It is interesting to mention here that, in view of the formula
provided and , by using Equation (1), it is a simple exercise to show that the Laplace transform of a generalized hypergeometric function is obtained as [3,19,20]:
provided that when , , for w arbitrary, or , and .
Further, in Equation (29a), if we take , , and , we find that (see [20]),
provided , , and .
Finally, in Equation (29b), if we take and either or , then it is easy to see that the series appearing on the right-hand side of Equation (29b) are summable by known summation theorems in Equations (6) and (7), respectively, and we find that
provided and , and that
provided and .
The results in Equations (29b) and (29c) are very well-known in the literature and are recorded, for example, in the work of [20].
In addition to Equation (29a), it is interesting to observe here that, when and , on similar lines, we can obtain the following result in view of the conditions of convergence of mentioned in Section 1.
provided , and .
Remark 2.
1. Since there is no summation theorems for the series for argument and are available in the literature, at this moment, it is not possible to find the Laplace-type integrals for the generalized hypergeometric function . We leave this open problem for the readers.
2. Laplace-type integrals in the case were given by Deepthi et al. [21] and connections with fractional integral operators were recently studied by Parmar and Purohit [22].
2. Laplace-Type Integrals Involving Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
In this section, we establish several new, interesting and elementary Laplace-type integrals in the most general form, involving generalized hypergeometric functions asserted in the following theorems that follow directly from Equations (29a) and (29e) and the known results in Equations (16)–(26). The results presented in this section would serve as key formulas from which, on specializing the parameters, lead to several results, some of which are known and others are believed to be new.
[A] Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric function
The results to be established are asserted in the following theorems.
Theorem 1.
Theorem 2.
Theorem 3.
Theorem 4.
Remark 3.
The reader should observe that the results given in Theorems 3 and 4 are different but obtained from the same known result in Equation (17).
Theorem 5.
Theorem 6.
Theorem 7.
Theorem 8.
Theorem 9.
Theorem 10.
Proof.
To establish the result in Equation (30) asserted in Theorem 1, we proceed as follows. In Equation (29e), if we take , , , , , and , considering positive sign, we get
We now observe that the appearing on the right-hand side of Equation (40) can be evaluated with the help of the result in Equation (16) and we easily arrive at the right-hand side of Equation (30). This completes the proof of Equation (30) asserted in Theorem 1.
In exactly the same manner, the results in Equations (31)–(39) asserted in Theorems 2–10 can be evaluated. We however omit the details. □
Corollary 1.
- (a)
- In Theorem 1, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (b)
- In Theorem 4, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (c)
- In Theorem 7, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (d)
- In Theorem 10, if we take , we get the following results.and
Similarly, other results can be obtained from Theorems 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9.
Remark 4.
1. The results in Equations (47) and (50) were recorded by [23] as well as [20].
2. The proofs of Theorems 11–35 given below are straight forward and can be proven with the help of the result in Equation (29e), thus they are given here without proof.
[B] Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric function
The results to be established are asserted in the following theorems.
Theorem 11.
Theorem 12.
Theorem 13.
Theorem 14.
Theorem 15.
Theorem 16.
Theorem 17.
Theorem 18.
Theorem 19.
Theorem 20.
Theorem 21.
Theorem 22.
Corollary 2.
- (e)
- In Theorem 11, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (f)
- In Theorem 14, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (g)
- In Theorem 17, if we take , we get the following results.and
- (h)
- In Theorem 21, if we take , we get the following results.and
Remark 5.
The results in Equations (65), (68) and (71) are known results due to Kim et al. [24].
[C] Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric function
The results to be established are asserted in the following theorems.
Theorem 23.
Theorem 24.
Theorem 25.
Theorem 26.
Corollary 3. (i)
In Theorem 24, if we take , we get the following results.
and
Similarly, other results can be obtained from Theorems 23, 25 and 26.
[D] Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric function
The results to be established are asserted in the following theorems.
Theorem 27.
Theorem 28.
Theorem 29.
Theorem 30.
Corollary 4. (j)
In Theorem 27, if we take , we get the following results.
and
Similarly, other results can be obtained from Theorems 28–30.
[E] Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric function
The results to be established are asserted in the following theorems.
Theorem 31.
Theorem 32.
Theorem 33.
Theorem 34.
Theorem 35.
Corollary 5. (k)
In Theorem 31, if we take , we get the following results.
and
Similarly, other results can be obtained from Theorems 32–35.
3. Concluding Remark
In the theory of generalized hypergeometric functions, classical summation theorems such as those of Gauss, Gauss second, Kummer, Bailey, Dixon, Watson, Whipple, Saalschütz and Dougall play a key role. Applications of the above-mentioned classical summation theorems are well-known. Very recently, Masjed-Jamei and Koepf established interesting and useful generalizations of the above-mentioned classical summation theorems in the most general form.
In this paper, an attempt has been made for providing a list of several Laplace-type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric functions for and 7 in the most general forms which would serve as key formulas from which, on specializing the parameters, lead to several results, some of which are known and others are believed to be new. The results established in this paper are simple, interesting, easily proven and may be potentially useful.
We conclude this section by remarking that other applications of the generalized summation theorems due to Masjed-Jamei and Koepf are under investigations and the same will form a part of the subsequent paper in this direction.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally to writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The research work of Insuk Kim is supported by Wonkwang University research fund in 2019.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the referees for making certain very useful suggestions which led to a better presentation of the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special Functions. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; Volume 71. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, W.N. Generalized Hypergeometric Series; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1935; Reprinted by Stechert-Hafner, New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Oberhettinger, F.; Badi, L. Tables of Laplace Transforms; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Rainville, E.D. Special Functions; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1960; Reprinted by Chelsea Publishing Company, Bronx, NY, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Koepf, W. Hypergeometric Summation: An Algorithmic Approach to Summation and Special Function Identities, 2nd ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Bromwich, T.J. An Introduction to the Theory of Infinite Series; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1948. [Google Scholar]
- Knopp, K. Theory and Applications of Infinite Series; Hafner: New York, NY, USA, 1990; Reprinted by Dover. [Google Scholar]
- Luke, Y.L. The Special Functions and Their Approximations; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, W.N. Products of Generalized Hypergeometric Series. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1928, 28, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. More Special Functions; Integrals and Series; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Masjed-Jamei, M.; Koepf, W. Some Summation Theorems for Generalized Hypergeometric Functions. Axioms 2018, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.S.; Rakha, M.A.; Rathie, A.K. Extensions of Certain Classical Summation Theorems for the Series 2F1, 3F2 and 4F3 with Applications in Ramanujan’s Summations. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2010, 2010, 309503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavoie, J.L.; Grondin, F.; Rathie, A.K. Generalizations of Watson’s theorem on the sum of a 3F2. Indian J. Math. 1992, 34, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Lavoie, J.L.; Grondin, F.; Rathie, A.K.; Arora, K. Generalizations of Dixon’s Theorem on the sum of a 3F2(1). Math. Comp. 1994, 62, 267–276. [Google Scholar]
- Lavoie, J.L.; Grondin, F.; Rathie, A.K. Generalizations of Whipple’s theorem on the sum of a 3F2. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1996, 72, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakha, M.A.; Rathie, A.K. Generalizations of classical summation theorems for the series 2F1 and 3F2 with applications. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2011, 22, 823–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, B. Integral Transforms and Their Applications, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Doetsch, G. Introduction to the Theory and Applications of the Laplace Transformation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Erdelyi, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Tables of Integral Transforms; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1954; Volume I–II. [Google Scholar]
- Slater, L.J. Confluent Hypergeometric Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Deepthi, P.; Prajapati, J.C.; Rathie, A.K. New Laplace transforms of the 2F2 hypergeometric function. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 2017, 8, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
- Parmar, R.K.; Purohit, S.D. Certain integral transforms and fractional integral formulas for the extended hypergeometric functions. TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 2017, 7, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Rathie, A.K.; Civijovic, D. New Laplace transforms of Kummer’s confluent hypergeometric functions. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kim, Y.S.; Rathie, A.K.; Lee, C.H. New Laplace transforms for the generalized hypergeometric functions 2F2. Honam Math. J. 2015, 37, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, S.; Kim, I.; Rathie, A.K. On a new class of Eulerian’s type integrals involving generalized hypergeometric functions. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2019, 16, 10. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).