Abstract
We have derived alternative closed-form formulas for the trigonometric series over sine or cosine functions when the immediate replacement of the parameter appearing in the denominator with a positive integer gives rise to a singularity. By applying the Choi–Srivastava theorem, we reduce these trigonometric series to expressions over Hurwitz’s zeta function derivative.
Keywords:
Dirichlet η, λ, β functions; Riemann’s zeta function; Hurwitz’s zeta function; harmonic numbers MSC:
11M41; 33B15
1. Preliminaries
All particular cases of the general summation formula for the trigonometric series
with parameters , we derived in [1] and expressed as a single formula via the power series
and one can obtain each of them by looking up in Table 1 and taking the corresponding parameters, including and , with F standing for Riemann’s function, initially defined by the series [2]
or Dirichlet functions defined as follows:
Table 1.
Particular and closed-form cases of (2).
Riemann’s function satisfies the functional equation [3]
where is the gamma function [4]
introduced by Euler. On the other hand, integration by parts of the integral (6) gives rise to the basic relation
which can be extended for arbitrary :
and this formula one can use to express the Pochhammer symbol:
Rewriting integral (6) as
provides the analytic continuation of the gamma function for all complex numbers, except for integers less than or equal to zero.
For , Euler’s reflection formula [4] (p. 35) holds:
The first logarithmic derivative of the gamma function [5] is the function (also known as the digamma), i.e.,
whence we find . It is connected to the nth harmonic number , given as the sum of reciprocal values of the first n positive integers by the equality
where is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, obtained as the limiting value of the sequence as .
As an extension of the Riemann zeta function the Hurwitz zeta function appears, initially defined by the series [2]
Obviously, . A straightforward consequence of (12) is
and because of that, for most purposes, it suffices to restrict a to . In addition, most references treat a as a real number with . Considering a function of a, with fixed, is analytic in the half-plane .
The Hurwitz zeta function satisfies an identity that generalizes the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function [3] (p. 257, Theorem 12.6)
but we rewrite it in a more suitable form:
For in (14), by relying on Euler’s famous formula and elementary properties of the complex logarithm, we evaluate
Multiplying by , taking account of (12) and (6), we have
Introducing the substitution , then interchanging the sum and integral, we obtain the integral representation of the Hurwitz zeta function:
Given (4), one easily derives the relations of the function to and :
We conclude that the function extends analytically to the whole complex plane, including , since
Further, using (5), then setting in (15), we find
However, (17) tells us that, as for the function, is analytical for all complex numbers except , where it has a non-removable singularity. In addition, (17) immediately gives rise to , , because by setting , in the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function (5), we find
Because of
we express the function through a difference of two Hurwitz functions:
Using (16), we find its integral, represented as
which defines as an analytical function for , but employing the functional equations conjectured by Euler in 1749 and proved by the Swedish mathematician Malmsten in 1842,
extends to the whole complex plane. By virtue of (9), Equation (20) can be rewritten as follows:
whence we find , .
Thus, owing to
the right-hand side series in (2) truncates. Thus, we obtain [1], one type of closed-form formula. So, for , where and or , we have all these cases comprised by the general formula [1]
We can obtain each from Table 1 by choosing the corresponding parameters.
2. Alternative Closed-Form Formulas
For in (1), and putting , then , we have
where presents Riemann’s zeta function.
However, by taking limits and in the first and the second formula of (22), respectively, one encounters singularities of the function, so we have to act differently.
Theorem 1.
Letting in the first formula of (22), one brings the sine series in closed form:
where . This series defines the Clausen function [1] (p. 452).
Proof.
We are not allowed to replace with in the first formula of (22) since and in the term for in the series, and we encounter singularities. We recall the Hurwitz formula connecting a trigonometric series and the Hurwitz zeta function.
In the first derivative of the Formula (14) for and , we have
For , we have
By subtracting these equalities, we obtain
Hence, we obtain the sum of the sine series. □
Theorem 2.
Letting in the second formula of (22), one brings the cosine series in closed form:
where . This series defines the Clausen function [1] (p. 452).
Proof.
Similarly, one cannot immediately replace with , so it is necessary to perform a different method. Taking the first derivative of Formula (14) with respect to z for , we have
Setting here , we find
For , we have
By adding these equalities, we obtain
Thence, we obtain the sum of the cosine series. □
For and putting in (1), based on (22) and using its relation to the zeta function, (17), we obtain the alternating series over the sines and cosines expressed in terms of the Dirichlet eta function:
Similarly, for and putting in (1), we find
Theorem 3.
For , the series (25) takes the closed form
Proof.
These replacements are legitimate since we encounter no singularities in (25).
Further, from (25), we have
and split the right-hand side series as follows:
Taking account of , we can express the last right-hand side series in terms of the zeta function as a difference of two series:
If we set in (5), we can determine values of Riemann’s zeta function at negative odd integers:
By shifting indices in both series of (29) and applying (30) and (8), the difference (29) becomes
where denotes Pochhammer’s symbol, given by (8). We refer now to the theorem in [6] (p. 419), which we state here in a slightly modified form.
Theorem 1.
For every non-negative integer n there holds
with .
For the first series of (31), we set in (32) , , , then again, , , , and subtract the second equality from the first. In this way, we obtain
Knowing that for and , , the right-hand side sum becomes
We obtain the same structure for the second series, with the sole difference that instead of , there appears . The subtraction yields the sum of (31), which is the sum of the right-hand side series in (28). So, for (31) we find
By differentiating (5) we can evaluate for positive integers n. So, the left-hand side is , but on the right-hand side, we obtain a sum of four terms; and notice that in three of them, appears while only one contains , i.e.,
With , all the terms except for the latter become zero, and we find
Because of (34) and , for the last row of (33), we have
Adding this modified Formula (33) to (28), after a rearrangement, we arrive at (27). □
Theorem 5.
For , the series (26) takes the closed form
Proof.
Following a similar procedure as in the proof of the preceding theorem, we replace with in (26) and have
The function is analytic in the whole complex plane, so to bring the latter series into closed form, we express it first as a sum comprising the value of , obtained for , and its remainder, i.e.,
Further, we act in the same manner as in the previous proof. Relying on the relation and (30), we determine the remainder in (36) as a difference of the two series
By using the identity , and summing up the first and second equations of (22) with (25) and (26), respectively, we obtain
Theorem 6.
If in the first formula of (38), the following holds:
Proof.
Since , in the first formula of (38) for singularity is encountered, and for there is singularity of the lambda function at 1, so we are not permitted to immediately replace with but have to take the limit
Further, by bringing the fractions to the same denominator, we have
The denominator tends to zero as tends to .
As for the numerator, knowing that , we have
where, relying on the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function (5), we make use of the limiting value
So, we can apply L’Hopital’s rule here. For the limiting value of the first derivative of the denominator, we find
Now, we take the limit of the first derivative of the numerator
First of all, using the relation , we find
It is easy to see that in the neighborhood of , there holds
and looking up in [7] (p. 23), we read
Thus, there follows
By replacing this in (41), omitting , it remains to calculate
Because of , we conclude that the limiting value of the sum of only the first and third terms is zero, and finding the limit reduces to
We have applied here the relation (11).
Thus, taking account of all of this, the value of (40) is
and the trigonometric series (39) can now be expressed as
and after shifting the summation index in the last series, making use of the relation and applying (30), one can represent it as a difference of two series in terms of the zeta function:
We have already dealt with these series in Formula (31), but here we express this difference as follows:
Adding the right-hand side to (42), after a rearrangement, and using (13), we obtain (39). □
Theorem 7.
If in the second formula of (38), it holds that
Proof.
After taking the limit in the second formula of (38), acting in the same manner as in the proof of the previous theorem, we first find
We deal again with the remainder and rewrite it as follows:
Employing a similar procedure as in the case of the preceding theorem, we come to the closed-form Formula (43). □
For alternating series related to (38) we can express them as a power series involving Dirichlet’s beta function
Theorem 8.
If α is replaced with in the first formula of (45), we obtain the following closed form:
Proof.
These replacements are legitimate because we do not encounter singularities since the function is analytic in the whole complex plane; knowing that and by using (20), we easily calculate
Further, from (45), we have
splitting the right-hand side series in three, but writing it for brevity now as
By shifting the summation index and making use of (21), the last series becomes
Taking account of (18), we further change (47) to
That means we are dealing with two series over the Hurwitz zeta functions and set and in (32), considering, apart from t, the same formula for as well.
Replacing a in succession with and in (32), then subtracting these equalities, we obtain (48) on the left-hand side. The right-hand side consists of a sum of four terms, the first one being
then of the two sums
and finally of
For , the expressions present negative odd integers, which means , so the first sum in (49) equals zero.
Expression (50) is transformed into
and this is obtained by setting in the relation
which in turn we obtain from (18) by relying on the identity [5]
Collecting all the cases, we arrive at the closed-form Formula (46). □
Theorem 9.
If α is replaced with in the second formula of (45), we obtain the following closed forms:
We can organize all these formulas by writing them as a general closed-form formula comprising the Formulas (23), (24), (27), (35), (39), (43), (46), and (51), i.e.,
and one can obtain all its particular cases from Table 2 by choosing the corresponding parameters.
Table 2.
Closed-form cases, .
Thus, we have two types of closed-form formulas for each case of trigonometric series.
Author Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Tričković, S.B.; Stanković, M.S.; Vidanović, M.V. On the summation of trigonometric series. Int. Trans. Spec. Func. 2008, 19, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Cambridge Universiy Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Apostol, T.M. Introduction to Analytic Number Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Olver, F.W.J. Asymptotics and Special Functions; A K Peters: Wellesley, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Bateman, H.; Erdélyi, A. Higher Transcendental Functions Volume I; McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1953. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, J.; Srivastava, H.M. A certain family of series associated with the Zeta and related functions. Hiroshima Math. J. 2002, 32, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Titchmarsh, E.C. The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).