Abstract
This manuscript aims to provide a new characterization of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras due to their ideals and proposes stabilizers. In the setup of the main results, we construct particular subsets of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras and we propose important properties of these subsets by investigating whether these sets are ideals or not. Furthermore, we investigate whether the introduced subsets of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras are minimal ideals. Afterwards, we define stabilizers in a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra and obtain their set theoretical properties. As an implementation of the theoretical findings, we present numerous examples and illustrative remarks to guide readers.
MSC:
06F05; 03G25; 03G10
1. Introduction
Sheffer stroke is a binary operation which was introduced by H. M. Sheffer in his landmark paper [1]. This notion enables mathematicians to reduce and unify the number of axioms and notations in algebraic structures, and it provides compact representations. In the last three decades, Sheffer stroke has attracted remarkable interest from researchers and is extensively applied to algebraic structures. In addition to the theoretical point of view, Sheffer stroke has been utilized in numerous crucial research projects in the engineering sciences. Conducting a quick literature review, one may easily find important applications of Sheffer stroke in the design of chips. We refer readers to the interesting projects found in references [2,3,4,5,6]. Motivated by the application potential of Sheffer stroke, scholars have applied this binary operation in implicational algebras, ortholattices and Boolean algebras. Undoubtedly, there is a vast wealth of literature on this topic and we refer to [7,8,9] as particularly interesting papers.
As an algebraic counterpart of Hilbert’s positive implicative propositional calculus [10], Hilbert algebras were proposed by Henkin and Skolem in [11] and employed in research based on various types of logic. Hilbert algebras have been brought into the spotlight in many papers and their main properties have been investigated. In a recent paper [12], the authors studied the Sheffer stroke operation and Sheffer stroke basic algebra. They presented the Sheffer stroke basic algebra on a given interval, named interval Sheffer stroke basic algebra, and gave some features of an interval Sheffer stroke basic algebra, while, in [13], Hilbert algebras and the relationship between Sheffer stroke and Hilbert algebras was introduced. Subsequently, Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras are being studied in brand-new papers ([14,15,16]) due to fuzzy filters, fuzzy ideals with t-conorms and neutrosophic structures. We shall highlight that establishing stabilizers for algebraic structures has always been an interesting but gruelling task in theoretical mathematics. This objective has been achieved in many papers regarding residuated lattices and BL-algebras (see [17,18,19,20]). To the best of our knowledge, stabilizers of Hilbert algebras have not been handled so far. Thus, the main objective of this manuscript is to fill this gap by proposing Sheffer stroke stabilizers of Hilbert algebras and improving the ongoing theory on this subject.
The organization of the manuscript is as follows: in the next section, we provide background material on Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras and ideals. In Section 3, we represent characterizations of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras due to ideals. We present the main outcomes of the manuscript and propose stabilizers of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras in Section 4.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we give basic definitions and notions about Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras and ideals.
Definition 1
([8]). Let be a groupoid. The operation ∘ is said to be a Sheffer stroke if it satisfies the following conditions for all
- (S1)
- (S2)
- (S3)
- ,
- (S4)
- .
In Definition 1, a groupoid can be determined as a group with a partial function which especially states a binary operation in category theory and homotopy theory.
Definition 2
([13]). A Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra is a structure of type (2), in which T is a nonempty set and ∘ is Sheffer stroke on T, such that the following identities are satisfied for all :
- (SHa1)
- (SHa2)
- If then .
Lemma 1
([13]). Let be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, there exists a unique , such that the following identities hold for all :
- 1.
- 2.
- ,
- 3.
- .
Lemma 2
([13]). Let be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, the relation if and only if is a partial order on T. Moreover, 1 is the greatest element of T.
Lemma 3
([13]). Let be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, the following hold for all :
- (Shb1)
- ,
- (Shb2)
- ,
- (Shb3)
- ,
- (Shb4)
- ,
- (Shb5)
- ,
- (Shb6)
- ,
- (Shb7)
- , and
- (Shb8)
- if , then and .
Lemma 4
([13]). Let be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra with the least element 0, the greatest element 1, and a unary operation * on T be defined by for all . Then, the followings hold, for all :
- 1.
- and ,
- 2.
- and ,
- 3.
- ,
- 4.
- ,
- 5.
- ,
- 6.
- , and
- 7.
- .
Lemma 5
([13]). Let be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra and ≼ be a natural ordering induced by this algebra. Then, is a join-semilattice with the greatest element 1, where , for all . If is a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra with the least element 0, then is a meet-semilattice, and , for all .
Definition 3
([13]). A nonempty subset ℓ of a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra is called an ideal if
- (SSHI1)
- ,
- (SSHI2)
- and imply , for all .
Theorem 1
([13]). Let ℓ be a subset of a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra such that . Then, ℓ is an ideal of T if and only if and imply , for all .
3. Characterizations by Ideals
In this section, we characterize Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras by ideals. Unless otherwise specified, T denotes a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra, and is briefly written.
Define a subset of a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T by
for any .
Lemma 6.
Let S be a nonempty subset of T. Then, the following conditions are equivalent:
- 1.
- S is an ideal of T.
- 2.
- , for all .
- 3.
- implies , for all and .
Proof.
- (1)⇒(2)
- Let S be an ideal of T and . Suppose that . Then, . By Theorem 1, . Thence, from (SSHI2).
- (2)⇒(3)
- Let and , for any . Then, from Lemma 2, (S1) and (Shb4). Thus, , and so, .
- (3)⇒(1)
- Let S be a nonempty subset of T such that implies , for any and . Since from (S1) and Lemma 4 (5), it is obtained that . Assume that and . Since from (S1) and Lemma 1 (1) and (2), it follows that .
□
Lemma 7.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then,
- 1.
- ,
- 2.
- ,
- 3.
- ,
- 4.
- ,
- 5.
- ,
- 6.
- ,
- 7.
- if , then
(i) ,
(ii)
for all .
Proof.
- 1.
- Since from Lemma 2, (S1) and (Shb4), we have .
- 2.
- Since and from Lemma 4 (1) and Lemma 2, respectively, it is obtained from (1) that , for all
- 3.
- Since from (S2), Lemma 4 (1) and (3), it follows from (1) that , for all
- 4.
- from Lemma 2 and Lemma 4 (1).
- 5.
- , from (S2), Lemma 4 (1) and (3).
- 6.
- Since from (S1), Lemma 4 (1) and (5), we establish that , for any .
- 7.
- Let .
- (i)
- Then, from (Shb8), andfrom (S1) and (S2). It is obtained from Lemma 2 that , for all . Thus, , and so, , for any .
- (ii)
- is proved from (1) and (7) (i).
□
Lemma 8.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, , for all .
Proof.
Since and , for all , we arrive at and from Lemma 7 (ii). Therefore, , for all . □
Example 1
([13]). Consider a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra in which a set has the Hasse diagram in Figure 1 and the Sheffer operation ∘ has the Cayley table in Table 1:
Figure 1.
Hasse diagram of T in Example 1.
Table 1.
Cayley table of ∘ on T in Example 1.
Then,
Lemma 9.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, , for all .
Proof.
Let . Since and , we obtain and , and so, . Thus, . Thence, , for all . Moreover, and from Lemma 7 (ii). So, , for all . □
Lemma 10.
Let ℓ be a nonempty subset of T. Then, ℓ is an ideal of T if and only if for all ,
- (SSHI3)
- implies , and
- (SSHI4)
- and imply .
Proof.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T and . Since from (S1), (Shb4), Lemma 1 (1), Lemma 4 (1) and (SSHI1), it follows from (SSHI2) that , for any . Since from Lemma 5 and (Shb6), we have from (SSHI2) that , for any . Also, (SSHI4) is obvious from Theorem 1.
Conversely, let ℓ be a nonempty subset of T satisfying (SSHI3) and (SSHI4). Since 0 is the least element of T, it is obtained from (SSHI4) that . Let and , for any . Then, from Lemma 5, (S2) and (S3) and (SSHI3). Since , for any , we obtain from (SSHI4) that , for any . □
Lemma 11.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then, and , for all .
Proof.
Since and from (S1), (S2) and (Shb1), it follows from Lemma 7 (ii) that and , and so, and , for all . □
Example 2.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra in Example 1. Then, and .
Lemma 12.
Let ℓ be a nonempty subset of T. Then, ℓ is an ideal of T if and only if ℓu is an ideal of T, for all .
Proof.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T, and be a subset of T, for any . Since from Lemma 1 (2), Lemma 4 (1) and (5), (S1) and (SSHI1), it is concluded that . Assume that and . Then, and . Since from (S1), (S2) and (Shb2), we obtain . Thus, . Hence, is an ideal of T.
Conversely, let be an ideal of T such that ℓ be a nonempty subset of T, for any . Since , for any , it follows that from Lemma 1 (2), Lemma 4 (1) and (5), (S1) and (SSHI1). Suppose that and . Then, there exist and , such that and . Since and from (SSHI2), (S1), (S2) and (Shb2), we obtain , for any . Therefore, ℓ is an ideal of T. □
Example 3.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra in Example 1. For the ideal of T, ℓf is an ideal of T.
Theorem 2.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T. Then, ℓu is the minimal ideal of T containing ℓ and u, for any .
Proof.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T. By Lemma 12, ℓu is an ideal of T. Assume that . Since from (S1), (Shb4) and Lemma 1 (2), it is obtained from Lemma 2 that . Then, which means . So, , for any . Since from Lemma 1 (1), Lemma 4 (1) and (SSHI1), we have , for any . Let be an ideal of T containing ℓ and u. Thus, , for any . Since and , it follows from (SSHI2) that . Thence, , for any . □
Remark 1.
Let ℓ1 and ℓ2 be two ideals of a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra . Then, is always an ideal of T. However, is generally not an ideal of T. If , then is an ideal of T.
Example 4.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. For the ideals and of T, is an ideal of T but is not an ideal of T since when and .
Lemma 13.
Let ℓ be a nonempty subset of T. Then, ℓ is an ideal of T if and only if
- (SSHI5)
- and
- (SSHI6)
- and imply , for all .
Proof.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T. Then, is obvious from . Assume that and , for any . Since , from (Shb7), (S1), (S2) and Lemma 2, it follows from (SSHI4) that . Thus, from (SSHI2).
Conversely, let ℓ be a nonempty subset of T satisfying (SSHI5) and (SSHI6). Suppose that and , for any . So, and from Lemma 2, (SSHI5), Lemma 4 (1) and (3). Hence, from (SSHI6), Lemma 4 (1) and (3). Thereby, ℓ is an ideal of T. □
Theorem 3.
Let ℓ and be two ideals of of T. Then,
- 1.
- if and only if ,
- 2.
- implies ,
- 3.
- implies ,
- 4.
- ,
- 5.
- ,
- 6.
- ,
- 7.
- ,
- 8.
- and
- 9.
- and ,
for any .
Proof.
- 1.
- Let . Since from Lemma 1 (1), Lemma 4 (1) and (SSHI1), we get . Conversely, let . Since from (S1), (Shb4) and Lemma 1 (1) and (2), it is obtained from Lemma 2 that , for any . Then, from (SSHI2), and so, . Thus, . Since , for all , and , it follows from (SSHI2) that , and so, . Hence, , for any .
- 2.
- Let and . Then, . Since from (Shb8), (S1), (S2) and Lemma 2, we have from (SSHI4) that which implies . Thence, .
- 3.
- Let , and . Then, . Thus, , and so, .
- 4.
- Since and , it follows from (3) that and . Then, . Let . Thus, and which imply and . Since , we obtain . Hence, , and so, .
- 5.
- Sincefrom (S1) and (S3), it follows that .
- 6.
- from (5) and (S1).
- 7.
- By substituting in (5), it is obtained from (S2) that .
- 8.
- They are proved from (2).
- 9.
- and from Lemma 4 (1) and (3), (S2) and Lemma 1 (2).
□
However, does not imply , and does not satisfy .
Example 5.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, when , for an ideal of T. Also, ȷa when .
Corollary 1.
Let ℓ be an ideal of T. Then,
- 1.
- and
- 2.
- ,
for any .
Lemma 14.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then is an ideal of T.
Proof.
Since 0 is the least element of T, we have . Let and , for any . Then, and . Since
from Lemma 1 (2) and (3), (S1) and (S2), Lemma 2 and (Shb2), it follows from Lemma 2 that , and so, . Thus, is an ideal of T. □
Lemma 15.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then,
- 1.
- and ,
- 2.
- if and only if ,
- 3.
- ,
Proof.
- 1.
- Since 0 is the least element and 1 is the greatest element in T, it is clear that and .
- 2.
- Let and . Since , it is obtained that . Then, . Conversely, let . Since , for all , we deduce that . Since , it follows that .
- 3.
- Since and from (S1), (S3) and from (1) and (2) from Lemma 1, it is obtained from (2) that and . After all, , for any . Assume that . Then, and . Since from (S1) and (Shb8), it follows from (S1), (S2) and Lemma 2 that . Thus, . Hence, , for any . Therefore, , for any .
□
Theorem 4.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then,
- 1.
- 2.
for any .
Proof.
- 1.
- It is obvious from Lemma 15 (2) that , for any . Let . Then, and , and so, . Thus, , which implies , for any . Thence, for any .
- 2.
- It is clear from Lemma 15 (2) that for any .
□
Example 6.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, .
4. Stabilizers
In this section, we introduce stabilizers in a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra.
Definition 4.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra and W be a nonempty subset of T. Then, a stabilizer of W is defined as follows:
Example 7.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. For the subsets and of T, the stabilizer of is and the stabilizer of is , respectively.
Lemma 16.
Let W, X and be nonempty subsets of T. Then,
- 1.
- implies ,
- 2.
- and ,
- 3.
- ,
- 4.
- and .
Proof.
- 1.
- Let and . Then, , for all . Since , we have , for all . Thence, , and so, .
- 2.
- Since we have from (S2), Lemma 4 (1) and (3) that , for all , it is concluded that , which implies . Let . Then, , for all . Thus, from Lemma 1 (1) and Lemma 4 (1), and so, . Hence, . Thereby, . Also, it follows from (S1) and (S2), Lemma 1 (2) and Lemma 4 (1) that , for all .
- 3.
- Since , for all , it is obtained from (1) that , for all , and so, . Assume that . Then, , for all . So, for all , which implies . Thus, . Therefore, .
- 4.
- Since and , for all , we ascertain from (1) that and , and so, and , for all . Suppose that , for any . Then, , for all . Since , for all and , it means that , for all , and so, . Thus, . Hence, . Let . So, , for some . Since , for all , it is clear that , for all . Then, , which implies that . Thence, .
□
Theorem 5.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra and W be a nonempty subset of T. Then, is an ideal of T.
Proof.
Since we obtain from (S2), Lemma 4 (1) and (3) that , for all , it follows that . Assume that and . Then, and , for all . Since
from (S1), (S2), (Shb2) and (Shb4), it is obtained that . Hence, is an ideal of T. □
However, W is usually not an ideal of T when is an ideal of T.
Example 8.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, is an ideal of T, yet is not an ideal of T.
Corollary 2.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra. Then,
- 1.
- and
- 2.
- , for all ideals ℓ of T.
Proof.
It is obtained from Lemma 1 (1) and (3), Lemma 4 (1) and Theorem 5. □
Definition 5.
Let T be a Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra, W and X be nonempty subsets of T. Then, a stabilizer of W with respect to X is defined as follows:
Example 9.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, , for the subsets and of T.
Theorem 6.
Let W, X, and be nonempty subsets and ℓ be an ideal of T, for all . Then,
- 1.
- implies ,
- 2.
- if and only if ,
- 3.
- ,
- 4.
- ,
- 5.
- and imply ,
- 6.
- ,
- 7.
- ,
- 8.
- ,
- 9.
- ,
- 10.
- ,
- 11.
- .
Proof.
- 1.
- Let . Since , for all , we obtain .
- 2.
- If , then from (1). Conversely, let ℓ be an ideal of T, such that , and . Since , for all , it follows from (SSHI4) that . Then, , for all , which implies . Thus, .
- 3.
- It is proved from (2).
- 4.
- Let , for any . Then, , for all . Since from Lemma 4 (1), Lemma 5, (S2) and (SSHI1), it is obtained that , and this means .
- 5.
- Let , and , for any . Since , for all , it is concluded that , for all . Hence, , and so, .
- 6.
- Since is an ideal of T, we ascertain from (4) that . Assume that , for any . Then, , for all . Thus, it follows from (Shb1), Lemma 4 (1), Lemma 5, (S1) and (S2) that , for all , and so, . Hence, . Therefore, .
- 7.
- from (6) and Lemma 16 (2).
- 8.
- Let . Then, , for all . Since , for all and , we obtain that , for all , which implies . Thus, . Conversely, let . Since , for all , it follows that , for all and , which means , for all . Thence, , and so, . Consequently, .
- 9.
- Let . Then, , for all . Since , for some and , we have , for some , and so, . Hence, . Conversely, let . Since , for some , it is concluded that , for some and , which follows , for all . Thereby, . So, . Thereby, .
- 10.
- from Lemma 5, (S2), Lemma 4 (1) and (3).
- 11.
- from (10).
□
Theorem 7.
Let X, and be nonempty subsets of T. Then, implies .
Proof.
Let , and . Since , for all , it follows that , for all , which means . Then, . □
The following example illustrates that the converse of Theorem 7 is not usually satisfied.
Example 10.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, but , for the subsets and of T.
Theorem 8.
Let ℓ be a nonempty subset and be an ideal of T. Then, is an ideal of T.
Proof.
Let ℓ and be two ideals of T. Since we have from Lemma 1 (1), Lemma 4 (1) and (3), Lemma 5, (S2) and (SSHI1) that , for all , it follows that . Assume that and , for any . Then, and , for all . Since
from Lemma 5 and (S3), and , it is obtained from (SSHI4) that , for all . Thus, . Hence, is an ideal of T. □
The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 8 does not hold in general.
Example 11.
Consider the Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebra T in Example 1. Then, is an ideal of T but is not since when and .
5. Concluding Remarks
This manuscript concentrates on Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras and their main characteristics. The main goal of this study is two-fold: as the first target, a new characterization of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras is presented in light of the ideals. In this task, proper subsets of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras are introduced, and it is shown that the proposed subsets possess the relationship between lattice and set-theoretical operators. Secondly, we define stabilizers of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras for their nonempty subsets and underline their crucial properties. We enhance the theoretical results of the manuscripts with many examples and elaborative discussions.
Regarding future work, we aspire to define various ideals of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras by employing more compact and trivial subsets. In this vein, we will be able to construct a comparative approach between different algebraic structures, and this will result in the emergence of new aspects of Hilbert algebras.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.K. and H.B.; methodology, T.K. and H.B.; validation, T.K. and H.B.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K. and H.B.; resources, T.K. and H.B.; data curation, T.K. and H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, H.B.; visualization, T.K. and H.B.; supervision, H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The second author acknowledges financial support from the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (research core funding No. P2-0103).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Sheffer, H.M. A set of five independent postulates for Boolean algebras, with application to logical constants. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1913, 14, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Digital Logic Chip and Method Capable of Testing Design. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN101303392A/en (accessed on 4 June 2008).
- Testability Circuit for Mixed Signal Integrated Circuit. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN102928774A/en (accessed on 15 November 2012).
- Chip with Scan Chain Test Function and Test Method. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103033741A/en (accessed on 30 September 2011).
- Detection Circuit for Errors of FPGA Chip. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN203688761U/en (accessed on 20 June 2013).
- Radiation Signal Sensor. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN201654242U/en (accessed on 8 April 2010).
- Abbott, J.C. Implicational algebras. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Repub. Social. Roum. 1967, 11, 3–23. [Google Scholar]
- Chajda, I. Sheffer operation in ortholattices. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc. Fac. Rerum Nat. Math. 2005, 44, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- McCune, W.; Veroff, R.; Fitelson, B.; Harris, K.; Feist, A.; Wos, L. Short single axioms for Boolean algebra. J. Autom. Reason. 2002, 29, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasiowa, H. An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974; Volume 78. [Google Scholar]
- Henkin, L. An algebraic characterization of quantifiers. J. Symb. Log. 1951, 16, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oner, T.; Katican, T. Interval Sheffer Stroke Basic Algebras and Yang-Baxter Equation. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2021, 6, 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oner, T.; Katican, T.; Borumand Saeid, A. Relation between Sheffer stroke and Hilbert algebras. Categ. Gen. Algebr. Struct. Appl. 2021, 14, 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oner, T.; Katican, T.; Borumand Saeid, A. Fuzzy filters of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2021, 40, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oner, T.; Katican, T.; Borumand Saeid, A. Neutrosophic N-structures on Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 2021, 42, 221–238. [Google Scholar]
- Oner, T.; Katican, T.; Borumand Saeid, A. Fuzzy ideals of Sheffer stroke Hilbert algebras. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. A Phys. Sci. 2023, 93, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasouli, S. Galois connection of stabilizers in residuated lattices. Filomat 2020, 34, 1223–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, K.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y. On two new classes of stabilizers in residuated lattices. Soft Comput. 2019, 23, 12209–12219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borumand Saeid, A.; Mohtashamnia, N. Stabilizer in residuated lattices. Politehn. Univ. Buchar. Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 2012, 74, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
- Haveshki, M.; Mohamadhasani, M. Stabilizer in BL-algebras and its properties. Int. Math. Forum 2010, 5, 2809–2816. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).