Abstract
The identity given, either by I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik in Table of integrals series and products named 9.134 or in the handbook “mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables” done by Abramowitz-Stegun named or in the book “special functions” done by G. Andrews, R. Askey and R. Roy named page 127 with a slight modification is true provided that are not natural numbers and is not an integer (see Gradshteyn, Ryzhik, 9.130). In this manuscript we consider a case where is an integer by taking , . We give and prove the right identity for any positive integer a and for any any positive integer n.
Keywords:
hypergeometric functions; quadratic transformation; hypergeometric series with finitely many terms and hypergeometric series with infinitely many terms MSC:
33C05; 33D15
1. Introduction
The Gaussian hypergeometric function (GHF) is a series defined by
with and where is the Pochhammer symbol (or shifted factorial) defined by
First, we point out that the GHF has many interesting applications including but not limited to [1] where the authors used the GHF to develop a safe and secure Bank locker system for Banks.
Second, we also want to point out that the quadratic transformations which relate two hypergeometric functions (with the variable in one and a quadratic function of the variable in the other), are true under some condition. In fact, in [2], page 1008, authors wrote “The series defines an analytic function that, speaking generally, has singularities at the points , and ∞. (In the general case, there are branch points). We make a cut in the plane along the real axis from to ; that is, we require that for . Then, the series will, in the cut plane, yield a single-valued analytic continuation, which we can obtain by means of the formulas below (provided is not a natural number and and are not integers). These formulas make it possible to calculate the values of F in the given region, even in the case in which . There are other closely related transformation formulas that can also be used to get the analytic continuation when the corresponding relationships hold between ”.
The identity
given in
- I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik in Table of integrals series and products [2] named 9.134,
- the handbook “mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables” done by Abramowitz-Stegun [3] named ,
- in the book “special functions” done by G. Andrews, R. Askey and R. Roy [4] named page 127 with a slight modification
is true provided that are not natural numbers and is not an integer (see [2], 9.130, [5]). For generalized hypergeometric function see [6], page 312, .
Some people considered one of the cases where one of these conditions is not fulfilled for instance [7] where authors found an interesting result connected with the sum of ( page 78).
In this manuscript we consider a case where is an integer by taking , . Replacing by z we prove that for any positive integer a the above identity (2) becomes
and we prove that this identity (3) remains true for but for the above identity becomes
and should be written, for , as
Let us prove first that (3) is not true for any positive integer a and for any integer . The left hand side (LHS) of the identity (3) is well defined and is a series with infinitely many terms, whereas, in the right hand side RHS rises two situations:
- either the seriesis well-defined as it is a series with finitely many terms since the summation is only for , and the fact that is also a negative integer does not do any harm,
- oris also a series with infinitely many terms by taking the limit as u tends to zero of
In this contribution we begin to prove that for and the identity (3) is not true in both situations then we prove that the identity (3) is not true for any positive integer a and (n integer) and taking into account
the identity (3) should be written as
with, for and for any positive integer a we have
and for and for any positive integer a we have
please note the difference between ± and ∓.
Remark 1.
Throughout this manuscript we use the notation (4).
2. The Case
Theorem 1.
Proof.
Let us consider the two term recurrence relation
The sequence fulfils (7). Moreover, The sequence fulfils (7) with . In fact
Now, we prove that the rational functions and fulfil the following two term recurrence relation (with a slight modification of (7))
- Now, we prove that the rational functionfulfils (8). Note here that this proof is only true for . We begin by a change of variable, for the + sign, we assumewhereas for the − sign, we assumeLet us expand the LHS of (10). Please note here that our hypergeometric is a series with finitely many terms. Some computations lead toThus, usingthe coefficients of , arewhich is identically zero. The remaining terms areandThe same steps should be followed for the − sign.
To finish the proof of the Theorem, it should be pointed out that, when the rational functions and fulfil (8), then subtracting the two quantities, we get
fulfils (7) (the cancels) and
With this achievement, we have proved that in situation one, where we considered the series
is well-defined as it is a series with finitely many terms since the summation is only for , the fact that is also a negative integer does not do any harm as the identity (3) is not true. □
2.1. The Case and for the Second Situation
The situation where
is a series with infinitely many terms by taking the limit as u tends to zero of
is, also wrong. In fact, with the + sign (same steps for the − sign), the identity (3) is false for and . In fact
On the other side, we have
In fact,
Using (for )
we have the desired result.
When u goes to 0, goes to which is not equal to .
2.2. Appendix
Here is a Maple instruction for the case -theorem:
- >
- restart;
- >
- >
- >
- >
- factor(simplify(vn(0)-wn(0)));
- >
- factor(simplify(vn(1)-wn(1)+un(1)));
- >
- factor(simplify(vn(2)-wn(2)-un(2)));
- >
- factor(simplify(vn(3)-wn(3)-un(3)));
- >
- factor(simplify(vn(4)-wn(4)-un(4)));
0
0
0
0
0
3. Resolution of an Isolated Case of the Identity for
Theorem 2.
For the identity (3) remains true for and should be written as
and should be written as
Please note the difference between ± and ∓.
Proof.
The following proof does not include the case where and this case remains an open problem. For a, any positive integer, we consider the following relation
We prove that , and fulfil this relation (12).
- Let us begin by proving that fulfil this relation (12).In fact, for , we havewhich becomeswhich becomesto prove that this expression vanishes, it is equivalent to prove thatalso vanishes. It is equivalent to prove thatLet us write this last expression aswhich becomeswhich becomeswhich iswhich is exactly zero.
- Second, let us prove that also fulfil the relation (12). In fact, for , let us prove thatequivalently, we prove thatThe left-hand side becomeswhich is exactlywhich is exactly the right-hand side.
To conclude, we can easily see that given by Section 2 and generate and a positive integer. The same conclusion as for hypergeometric sums. □
Appendix
Here is a Maple instruction for the theorem:
- >
- restart;
- >
- hyper1:= (n, a) );
- >
- hyper2: = (n, a) ;
- >
- Una: = (n, a) ;
- >
- simplify(hyper1(5, 3)-hyper2(5, 3)-Una(5, 3));
- >
- simplify(hyper1(1, 3)-hyper2(1, 3)+Una(1, 3));
- >
- simplify(hyper1(0, 3)-hyper2(0, 3));
0
0
0
4. Open Problem
For write the analogue of (5). We are working on this.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the three referees for their valuable comments which helped to improve the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Mandle, A.K.; Namdeo, V. Application of Gauss’s hypergeometric functions to protect bank lockers. Compliance Eng. J. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 6th ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, G.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special Functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 71; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- DLMF: NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. Available online: https://dlmf.nist.gov/ (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- Miller, A.R.; Paris, R.B. Transformation formulas for the generalized hypergeometric function with integral parameter difference. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2013, 43, 291–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, M.I.; Khan, M.K. Some Quadratic Transformations and Reduction Formulas associated with Hypergeometric Functions. Appl. Appl. Math. 2020, 15, 71–86. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).