Elemental Concentrations of Major and Trace Elements in the Spring Waters of the Arctic Region of Russia

Abstract

The Arctic region of Russia is rich with natural water resources. Some residents of this area prefer to use water from spring sources instead of tap water. However, the elemental composition for most of the springs is unknown, making it very important to regularly update water quality data. In this paper, the chemical composition of 24 natural springs near large cities of the Murmansk region were identified via titration, potentiometry, and mass spectrometry analysis with the low detection limits. The concentrations of a considerable number of micro-components have been determined for the first time. Concentrations of some hazardous pollutants have been found in spring water that exceed Russian hygienic limits by 2.5 times. In terms of chemical indicators, it was shown that in accordance with European and national water standards, only half of the tested natural water sources in the Murmansk region can be used for drinking water. The preferential spring was recommended near each major city in the region according to a set of chemical parameters. The results of chemical composition of the spring waters were disseminated publicly by placing the tags with QR codes with the link to the cloud storage near each studied spring.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the main factors that affect human health are living conditions and habits (52–53%), genetic factors (20%), state of the environment (20%), and medical support (7–8%). Human health is closely related to drinking water quality [1,2,3,4]. Concentrations of chemical elements contained in drinking water must meet hygienic standards to maintain a water and salt balance for body homeostasis and prevent possible toxic effects [5]. Excessive concentrations of chemical elements in water can cause health problems due to both acute and chronic (months and years) toxic effects. For example, nitrates are constantly present in the human body in small amounts, but problems associated with the formation of methemoglobin, which is unable to carry oxygen, may develop with an increase in the concentration of nitrates, which leads to oxygen starvation [6,7,8,9]. This is extremely dangerous when experiencing symptoms from diseases such as COVID-19 [10,11,12]. A particular danger occurs when high quantities of potentially toxic elements, the effects of which do not appear immediately, are contained in water, because the diseases they cause are chronic [2,13,14,15,16].

Most trace elements are potentially toxic to the human body [17] in high concentrations, whereas some of them are essential for humans in small amounts as microelements (

Table 1. The physiological functions of certain chemical elements on the human body.

Element	Function	Reference
Ca	Included in the skeleton and teeth in the form of phosphates; participates in the processes of blood clotting and muscle and neuronal reactions	[18,19]
Cr	Essential for the metabolism of sugars and fats	[17,20,21]
Mn	Part of enzymes, an enzyme activator, important in antioxidant action	[17,22]
Fe	Contained in hemoglobin in the enzymes peroxidase, catalase, and cytochrome oxidase; participates in the transformation of cellular energy	[17,23]
Co	A cofactor of several enzymes, such as vitamin B12, which controls the production of red blood cells	[17,24]
Ni	A cofactor in certain enzyme metal functions	[25]
Cu, Zn	Participates in the composition of metalloenzymes	[17,26,27]
Se	Part of the selenocysteine and selenomethionine amino acids	[28]
Mo	A cofactor of enzymes that affect the oxidation of purines and aldehydes, protein synthesis, and the metabolism of certain nutrients	[17,29]
Cd	Probably a metalohormone	[17,30]

).

The growing pollution of freshwater systems through emissions from industrial enterprises is one of the key environmental problems facing humanity around the world [31,32]. Even though most pollutants are present in low concentrations, they can accumulate in the body and cause serious toxicological problems [33,34,35]. About 884 million people worldwide do not have basic access to sanitary drinking water sources [36]. Four billion people experience severe water shortages for at least one month per year [37]. Back in 2010, the journal Nature showed that almost 80% of the world’s population is threatened by water pollution [38]. There is a growing distrust of tap water, so people in cities increasingly choose bottled or spring water for drinking [17,39].

People living in the extreme natural conditions of the Arctic regions experience constant high stress on their health due to factors such as the polar night and polar day, the unstable geomagnetic field, the long winter period, and the small number of sunny days throughout the year [40]. In this regard, issues related to the health of the population in such regions are extremely relevant.

The city of Murmansk, with a population of over 280,000 people, is the largest city in the world above the Arctic Circle [41]. It is located on the Kola Peninsula along the coast of the Barents Sea, which is part of the Arctic Ocean. The intensive development of the region, which has a population of more than 700,000 people, refused from the discovery of numerous deposits of mineral resources, which have been actively developed since the first half of the 20th century. Their extraction, processing, and transportation has a constant negative impact on the environment, including pollution of both soils [42,43] and water bodies [4,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. At the same time, the territory of the peninsula is marked on the map “Global geography of incident threat to human water security and biodiversity” as an area with a low risk of possible pollution. However, the groundwaters of the region are characterized by low protection and can be easily polluted [50]. Therefore, using this groundwater for drinking purposes, without proper controls, can be dangerous to human health. The population is only fragmentarily informed about the quality of spring waters The purpose of this work was to study and make public the chemical composition of the most popular spring waters in the Murmansk region, Russia (Kola peninsula, Russian Arctic zone). The study included the following steps: (i) to sample spring water and to determine the content of both macro-components and previously obscure micro-components, including potentially toxic elements with a low detection limit; (ii) to determine the water quality by comparison the results with international [9,53,54] and Russian national standards [55,56]; (iii) to make the results publicly available by placing the tags with QR codes (with the link to the cloud storage with data set) near each studied spring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The Murmansk Region is in the northwest of the Russian Federation. It borders Finland and Norway in the west and northwest and is washed by the White and Barents Seas. The Murmansk region’s total area is 144,900 km². The greatest length from west to east is about 550 km, from north to south, 400 km. Almost the entire territory lies north of the Arctic Circle and is located on the Kola Peninsula. Only the western and southwestern parts of the region connect to the mainland. The Murmansk region is one of the most lacustrine and riverine areas in Russia. The density of the river network is significant; some rivers have lengths of over 200 km. The climate of the Murmansk region is arctic-temperate and maritime, but it is influenced by the warm North Atlantic current, making it relatively mild. In the north of the peninsula the average temperature in winter is −14 °C, in summer, +14 °C. In the center and south of the peninsula during the winter months, frosts reach −40 to −50 °C. The average annual rainfall is about 400 mm [57].

The Murmansk region is one of the most urbanized regions of Russia; the population as of 1 January 2021, was 732,000 people. The largest cities in the region are Murmansk (282,851), Apatity (53,847), Monchegorsk (40,675), Kandalaksha (29,750), Kirovsk (25,944), and Olenegorsk (19,887) [39]. In this study, the elemental composition in the water of the most popular springs near or within the territory of large cities in the region was studied (Figure 1). All springs are easily accessible and used daily by the local citizens. The spring map is available by link [58] or by QR code (Figure 1c).

Overall, 24 springs were examined from 19 September to 4 October 2021 (Table 2).

Table 2. Coordinates, type and location of the investigated springs, air and water temperature, pH and flow rate at the time of sampling.

№	Type	Location	Coordinates	T Air, °C	T Water, °C	Yield of Water, L/s
	Murmansk and Kola district (Figure 2a)
1	Descending	On the city outskirts, 50 m east of the Chapel	68°58′19.2″ N 33°07′10.7″ E	9.0	5.6	*
2	Descending	200 m west of the roads’ junction to Abram-Mys, Murmansk and Nikel	68°58′42.4″ N 32°59′10.9″ E	7.0	6.1	0.04
3	Descending	Between 24 and 25 km of the Murmansk-Verkhnetulomsky highway, on the right, 15 m north of the road	68°47′18.6″ N 32°31′01.3″ E	8.7	2.9	0.27
4	Ascending	On the village outskirts, 150 m north of the Murmansk-Verkhnetulomsky highway	68°49′53.3″ N 32°45′15.7″ E	6.8	3.1	0.65
5	Descending	Between 2 and 3 km of the Kola-Zverosovkhoz highway, 50 m west of the road	68°51′43.4″ N 33°05′01.0″ E	5.0	4.3	0.10
6	Descending	Between 7 and 8 km of the upper airport street, 10 m north of the road	68°48′55.4″ N 32°57′53.2″ E	4.2	3.3	0.11
7	Descending	In the lowland, 40 m east of residential buildings	68°48′43.4″ N 32°48′50.9″ E	3.9	3.0	0.21
8	Descending	Between 7 and 8 km of the ring road around Murmansk, 50 m west of the road bridge	68°53′46.0″ N 33°07′23.5″ E	2.2	4.9	0.05
	Monchegorsk district (Figure 2b)
9	Descending	Southeastern city outskirts, 150 m southeast of the sports school building	67°55′20.9″ N 32°57′28.6″ E	6.9	5.0	0.33
10	Self-flowing well	8 km of the Monchegorsk-Rizh-Guba highway, 200 m north-east of the bus stop	67°52′59.8″ N 33°02′53.8″ E	7.6	5.1	0.40
11	Self-flowing well	8 km of the Monchegorsk-Rizh-Guba highway, 250 m north-east of the bus stop	67°53′01.3″ N 33°02′59.5″ E	8.2	2.9	0.35
12	Ascending	Between 1271 and 1272 km of the E105 highway, 50 m southeast of the highway	68°01′02.7″ N 32°57′19.1″ E	7.4	2.6	**
13	Self-flowing exploration well	250 m east of the roads’ junction to the Laplandia station along the E105 highway	68°16′09.4″ N 33°20′28.8″ E	9.2	3.6	0.20
14	Ascending	Near 1253 km of the E105 highway, 120 m south-west of the highway	67°52′22.7″ N 32°47′13.4″ E	6.3	3.8	**
	Kandalaksha district (Figure 2c)
15	Descending	Between 1179 and 1180 km of the E105 highway, 5 m north-west of the highway	67°23′42.8″ N 32°28′54.8″ E	12.2	4.1	0.018
16	Descending	The near-channel part of the left bank of the Niva River, 100 m downstream of the bridge	67°11′15.2″ N 32°28′11.8″ E	11.1	4.4	0.020
17	Descending	Between 6 and 7 km of the Kandalaksha-Umba highway, 5 m north of the highway	67°07′28.6″ N 32°32′36.6″ E	13.2	4.0	0.14
18	Ascending	Between 71 and 72 km of the Kandalaksha-Umba highway, 15 m east of the highway	66°55′58.0″ N 33°49′02.4″ E	12.5	5.4	**
19	Descending	The territory of the farm fellowship	66°42′38.4″ N 34°21′26.8″ E	11.7	3.8	0.26
	Apatity-Kirovsk district (Figure 2c)
20	Self-flowing exploration well	150 m south-west of the nunnery in the foothills of the Khibiny mountains	67°38′11.1″ N 33°43′20.8″ E	12.3	3.4	**
21	Self-flowing exploration well	25 m west of the road in the foothills of the Khibiny mountains	67°38′10.2″ N 33°42′45.3″ E	11.5	3.4	**
22	Mixed	Between 8 and 9 km of the Apatity-Kirovsk highway, 30 m south of the highway	67°34′56.4″ N 33°33′26.9″ E	11.8	3.3	**
23	Self-flowing well	The eastern outskirts of Apatity, in the area of a garage cooperative	67°33′12.5″ N 33°26′09.9″ E	11.1	3.7	0.27
24	Ascending	Southeast of the city of Apatity, between 7 and 8 km of the Apatity-Khibiny airport highway, 1.5 km to the left of the road	67°29′55.6″ N 33°29′17.3″ E	10.0	8.4	**

* it was impossible to determine the flow rate, water accumulates in the well; ** it was impossible to determine the flow rate, too large a head or several flows.

Table 2. Coordinates, type and location of the investigated springs, air and water temperature, pH and flow rate at the time of sampling.

№	Type	Location	Coordinates	T Air, °C	T Water, °C	Yield of Water, L/s
	Murmansk and Kola district (Figure 2a)
1	Descending	On the city outskirts, 50 m east of the Chapel	68°58′19.2″ N 33°07′10.7″ E	9.0	5.6	*
2	Descending	200 m west of the roads’ junction to Abram-Mys, Murmansk and Nikel	68°58′42.4″ N 32°59′10.9″ E	7.0	6.1	0.04
3	Descending	Between 24 and 25 km of the Murmansk-Verkhnetulomsky highway, on the right, 15 m north of the road	68°47′18.6″ N 32°31′01.3″ E	8.7	2.9	0.27
4	Ascending	On the village outskirts, 150 m north of the Murmansk-Verkhnetulomsky highway	68°49′53.3″ N 32°45′15.7″ E	6.8	3.1	0.65
5	Descending	Between 2 and 3 km of the Kola-Zverosovkhoz highway, 50 m west of the road	68°51′43.4″ N 33°05′01.0″ E	5.0	4.3	0.10
6	Descending	Between 7 and 8 km of the upper airport street, 10 m north of the road	68°48′55.4″ N 32°57′53.2″ E	4.2	3.3	0.11
7	Descending	In the lowland, 40 m east of residential buildings	68°48′43.4″ N 32°48′50.9″ E	3.9	3.0	0.21
8	Descending	Between 7 and 8 km of the ring road around Murmansk, 50 m west of the road bridge	68°53′46.0″ N 33°07′23.5″ E	2.2	4.9	0.05
	Monchegorsk district (Figure 2b)
9	Descending	Southeastern city outskirts, 150 m southeast of the sports school building	67°55′20.9″ N 32°57′28.6″ E	6.9	5.0	0.33
10	Self-flowing well	8 km of the Monchegorsk-Rizh-Guba highway, 200 m north-east of the bus stop	67°52′59.8″ N 33°02′53.8″ E	7.6	5.1	0.40
11	Self-flowing well	8 km of the Monchegorsk-Rizh-Guba highway, 250 m north-east of the bus stop	67°53′01.3″ N 33°02′59.5″ E	8.2	2.9	0.35
12	Ascending	Between 1271 and 1272 km of the E105 highway, 50 m southeast of the highway	68°01′02.7″ N 32°57′19.1″ E	7.4	2.6	**
13	Self-flowing exploration well	250 m east of the roads’ junction to the Laplandia station along the E105 highway	68°16′09.4″ N 33°20′28.8″ E	9.2	3.6	0.20
14	Ascending	Near 1253 km of the E105 highway, 120 m south-west of the highway	67°52′22.7″ N 32°47′13.4″ E	6.3	3.8	**
	Kandalaksha district (Figure 2c)
15	Descending	Between 1179 and 1180 km of the E105 highway, 5 m north-west of the highway	67°23′42.8″ N 32°28′54.8″ E	12.2	4.1	0.018
16	Descending	The near-channel part of the left bank of the Niva River, 100 m downstream of the bridge	67°11′15.2″ N 32°28′11.8″ E	11.1	4.4	0.020
17	Descending	Between 6 and 7 km of the Kandalaksha-Umba highway, 5 m north of the highway	67°07′28.6″ N 32°32′36.6″ E	13.2	4.0	0.14
18	Ascending	Between 71 and 72 km of the Kandalaksha-Umba highway, 15 m east of the highway	66°55′58.0″ N 33°49′02.4″ E	12.5	5.4	**
19	Descending	The territory of the farm fellowship	66°42′38.4″ N 34°21′26.8″ E	11.7	3.8	0.26
	Apatity-Kirovsk district (Figure 2c)
20	Self-flowing exploration well	150 m south-west of the nunnery in the foothills of the Khibiny mountains	67°38′11.1″ N 33°43′20.8″ E	12.3	3.4	**
21	Self-flowing exploration well	25 m west of the road in the foothills of the Khibiny mountains	67°38′10.2″ N 33°42′45.3″ E	11.5	3.4	**
22	Mixed	Between 8 and 9 km of the Apatity-Kirovsk highway, 30 m south of the highway	67°34′56.4″ N 33°33′26.9″ E	11.8	3.3	**
23	Self-flowing well	The eastern outskirts of Apatity, in the area of a garage cooperative	67°33′12.5″ N 33°26′09.9″ E	11.1	3.7	0.27
24	Ascending	Southeast of the city of Apatity, between 7 and 8 km of the Apatity-Khibiny airport highway, 1.5 km to the left of the road	67°29′55.6″ N 33°29′17.3″ E	10.0	8.4	**

* it was impossible to determine the flow rate, water accumulates in the well; ** it was impossible to determine the flow rate, too large a head or several flows.

The appearance of various types of springs is shown in Figure 3.

2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis

Water samples for the element analysis were collected into disposable plastic test-tubes with a volume of 50 mL (n = 2) and preserved with 0.5 mL nitric acid (puriss. spec. 27-5, Russian government standard GOST 11125-84). For the determination of the ionic compositions, the probes were collected and loaded into pre-prepared disposable plastic bottles with a volume of 1 L (n = 2). All collected samples were stored in a portable refrigerator and transported in an automobile at a constant temperature of 5 °C.

The waters were analyzed by a mass spectrometer, with inductively coupled plasma (Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 DRC-e, Waltham, MA, USA). Multielement calibration solutions from Inorganic Ventures (Christiansburg, VA, USA) (IV-STOCK-29, IV-STOCK-21, IV-STOCK-28) were used for instrument calibration. Standard reference materials were used for quality control: V-STOCK-1643 Trace Elements in Fresh Water (High Purity Standards, Charleston, SC, USA). The pH values of the solutions and the concentration of chloride- and nitrate-ions were determined by the potentiometric method using the ionomer EXPERT-001 (Econix-Expert, Moscow, Russia), which was equipped with two ion-selective electrodes—a nitrate-selective electrode (ELIT-021, Nico Analit, Moscow, Russia) and a chloride-selective electrode (ECOM-Cl, Econix, Moscow, Russia)—in combination with the reference electrode ESr-10101 (Izmeritelnaya tekhnika, Moscow, Russia). As a buffer solution for the determination of nitrate-ions, a potassium alum of 1% and a phosphate buffered saline was used; for the determination of chloride-ions, a 1 M solution of KNO₃ was used. To control the quality of the measurements, a standard sample of nitrate ions GSO 6696-93, chloride ions GSO 6687-93, and GSO composition of water 7886-2001 were used. The hydrocarbonate content in the water was determined by the titrimetric method, and a standard sample GSO 8403-2003 of the hydrocarbonate solution was used for checking the measurement quality. Water and air temperature was measured using a HI 145 thermometer (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RA, USA). The pH was determined directly during sample collecting using a TDS-3 temperature sensor to consider the thermal compensation effect.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 3. Content of macro components, anions, pH, and total hardness in spring water.

	pH	Hardness, mmol/L	HCO3−, mg/L	NO3−, mg/L	Cl−, mg/L	Na, mg/L	Mg, mg/L	K, mg/L	Ca, mg/L
USEPA	6.5–8.5	-	-	44	250	-	-	-	-
EC	6.5–8.5	-	-	50	250	-	-	12	-
WOH	6.5–8.5	1,2	30–400	50	250	-	-	-	-
MPC *	6–9	5	-	45	350	200	50	-	-
First category **	6.5–8.5	<3.5	<400	<20	<250	<200	<65	<20	<130
Highest category **	6.5–8.5	0.75–3.5	30–400	<5	<150	<20	5–50	2–20	25–80
1	5.28	0.16	<10	0.97	<12	4.2	1.4	0.6	3.8
2	5.99	0.16	18.61	0.47	<12	4.0	1.4	0.7	4.1
3	6.28	0.16	23.92	0.58	<12	3.0	1.3	0.9	4.3
4	6.91	0.47	68.40	1.09	<12	5.3	4.1	2.6	12.0
5	6.02	0.29	20.87	0.52	<12	4.4	2.3	0.9	7.8
6	5.88	0.15	15.29	0.65	<12	2.5	1.4	0.8	3.6
7	7.40	0.43	47.87	9.17	<12	5.1	4.2	2.0	10.4
8	6.28	0.25	20.87	0.88	35.5	21.8	2.0	1.6	6.6
9	7.07	0.44	44.27	0.54	<12	3.0	4.3	1.1	10.6
10	7.59	1.51	69.15	2.14	<12	3.3	5.0	2.3	52.1
11	7.42	1.22	71.33	0.81	<12	3.4	4.5	1.9	41.3
12	7.03	0.27	22.94	0.48	<12	2.7	2.7	1.1	6.6
13	6.30	0.16	10.88	0.49	<12	3.0	1.0	0.6	4.7
14	6.67	0.19	<10	1.30	<12	1.5	1.0	0.3	5.9
15	6.06	1.15	42.56	3.32	156	61.6	6.9	2.8	34.8
16	7.03	0.31	51.64	0.51	<12	4.8	2.6	1.6	8.3
17	6.43	0.20	19.89	1.10	<12	2.4	0.9	0.5	6.5
18	6.97	0.37	52.39	2.10	<12	4.0	3.4	1.6	9.1
19	8.96	0.89	136.2	0.91	36.1	44.0	7.4	4.6	23.4
20	9.26	0.16	59.16	7.19	<12	21.5	0.3	7.1	5.8
21	8.26	0.27	60.66	8.39	<12	20.4	0.8	7.3	9.4
22	7.52	0.39	54.64	1.41	14.4	8.8	1.8	4.6	12.8
23	7.71	1.39	173.3	6.20	16.2	13.5	2.2	3.2	52.2
24	7.79	0.36	47.09	0.23	<12	2.3	1.5	1.8	12.1

* SanPiN 1.2.3685-21; ** SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02.

and

Table 4. Content of microelements in spring water.

	Li, µg/L	B, µg/L	Al, µg/L	V, µg/L	Mn, µg/L	Fe, µg/L	Ni, µg/L	Cu, µg/L	Zn, µg/L	Rb, µg/L	Sr, µg/L	Mo, µg/L	Ba, µg/L	Pb, µg/L	Bi, µg/L
USEPA	-	-	200	-	50	300	-	1000	-	-	-	-	2000	15	-
EC	-	-	200	-	50	200	-	-	-	-	-	-	100	-	-
WOH	-	2400	200	-	400	300	70	2000	-	-	-	70	1300	10	100
MPC *	30	500	200	100	100	300	20	1000	5000	100	7000	70	700	10	100
First category **	<30	<500	<200	-	<50	<300	<20	<1000	<5000	-	<7000	<70	<700	<10	-
Highest category **	<30	<300	<100	-	<50	<300	<20	<1000	<3000	-	<7000	<70	<100	<5	-
1	3.5	<10	459.0	<1	14.3	74.3	13.2	5.0	10.4	2.3	65.2	<0.3	18.9	0.16	<0.5
2	2.6	<10	34.0	<1	<3	<20	1.6	<1	1.5	1.3	38.5	0.5	13.9	<0.1	2.4
3	3.1	<10	24.2	<1	<3	<20	1.9	1.3	5.1	3.0	34.9	0.5	10.7	0.70	2.0
4	4.2	<10	5.0	<1	<3	31.3	1.8	<1	2.3	0.2	121.2	1.9	17.3	0.10	1.7
5	1.6	13.3	46.6	<1	<3	45.3	2.7	1.3	2.2	2.2	53.0	0.4	37.8	0.12	1.9
6	1.7	<10	26.4	<1	<3	<20	<1	<1	2.9	2.6	33.2	0.3	16.2	<0.1	<0.5
7	2.4	<10	112.6	2.3	<3	213.2	<1	<1	2.8	0.8	139.1	0.8	25.5	<0.1	2.5
8	1.2	<10	12.5	<1	<3	25.8	8.0	1.9	16.9	4.8	63.0	0.5	26.5	<0.1	2.1
9	1.7	<10	30.8	1.2	<3	51.8	1.1	1.0	3.3	0.3	40.7	0.5	5.9	0.20	1.8
10	2.5	<10	6.8	<1	<3	153.2	2.0	<1	2.9	0.2	169.1	0.8	53.2	<0.1	1.8
11	3.2	<10	6.8	<1	<3	110.4	1.8	<1	5.7	0.2	140.1	0.5	40.2	<0.1	<0.5
12	2.2	<10	5.8	<1	<3	21.8	<1	<1	11.0	0.1	33.0	1.7	17.9	0.13	2.3
13	1.4	<10	9.7	<1	<3	<20	<1	<1	2.4	0.3	38.4	0.4	4.9	<0.1	2.2
14	<1	<10	10.7	<1	<3	27.0	4.4	<1	4.0	0.6	17.1	0.5	2.2	0.26	3.0
15	11.6	<10	43.7	1.6	295.7	186.2	24.3	2.4	5.6	0.6	195.0	0.3	103.1	0.41	1.9
16	5.5	<10	8.2	1.5	<3	<20	<1	<1	1.3	0.2	64.1	0.4	9.6	<0.1	<0.5
17	1.0	<10	95.6	1.0	<3	49.0	<1	1.6	5.5	0.6	21.5	0.5	4.2	0.17	2.6
18	2.9	<10	6.1	1.1	<3	81.7	1.1	<1	6.7	0.2	46.2	0.6	8.1	<0.1	2.2
19	2.6	38.6	6.4	<1	10.7	59.7	1.1	<1	2.9	0.9	196.3	1.5	21.5	<0.1	2.0
20	1.0	<10	298.6	5.0	<3	73.1	<1	1.3	8.1	3.0	24.7	14.3	1.7	0.15	2.0
21	1.2	<10	24.3	<1	<3	20.7	<1	<1	3.8	8.7	62.9	19.5	0.9	0.15	<0.5
22	<1	<10	5.4	<1	<3	35.1	<1	<1	6.7	2.2	10.1	0.5	0.5	<0.1	2.6
23	<1	18.1	7.2	2.2	<3	124.7	1.7	1.6	5.0	1.0	202.6	0.8	68.5	<0.1	2.2
24	<1	<10	10.2	<1	<3	29.9	<1	<1	3.5	0.3	71.2	1.8	8.7	<0.1	1.9

* SanPiN 1.2.3685-21; ** SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02.

summarize the results of the analysis of 24 samples collected for the determination of macro- and micro-components, respectively. The standards of the World Health Organization (WHO) [9], United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [54], European Commission (EC) [53], and Russian Sanitary and Epidemiological Rules and Norms (SanPiN) 1.2.3685-21 (Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness to humans of environmental factors) [56] and 2.1.4.1116-02 (Drinking water. Hygienic requirements for the quality of bottled water. Quality control) [55] are provided for comparison. It should be noted that SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02 establishes a higher standard for maximum permissible concentration (MPC) for drinking bottled water of the first and highest categories.

The pH values for most of the studied samples were in the 6–8 range; however, both more acidic and more alkaline waters were also observed in the 5.28–9.26 pH range (Table 3). Some of the samples with low pH values (samples 1, 2, 5, and 15) had a yellowish tint, which is typical for water with a high concentration of humic acids [17]. Water from samples 1–3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 15, 17, 19, and 20 did not follow the standards of the WHO, USEPA, EC, and the requirements of SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02 for water pH values. The value of total water hardness varied from 0.15 to 1.5 mmol/L (i.e., waters were mainly of the soft type). All samples met the requirements for drinking water, but only water from samples 10, 11, 15, 19, and 23 corresponded to the highest category. Hydrocarbonates were found in all samples except samples 1 and 14, but only samples 4, 7, 9–12, 15, 16, and 18–24 met the requirements of the WHO and SanPiN 2.1.4.1074-01 for water of the highest category. In terms of nitrate content, all samples corresponded to MPC standards, but samples 7, 20, 21, and 23 did not correspond to the highest category. In terms of chloride ion content, only sample 15 did not correspond to the highest category.

In principle, the cationic composition of the studied samples met the requirements of the WHO and SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02. However, for samples 1 and 20, concentrations of Al were detected that were 2.5 and 1.5 times higher, respectively, than the MPC. In sample 15, the concentration of Mn was 3 times higher than the MPC and slightly exceeded the MPC of Ba (Table 4). Moreover, samples 8, 15, and 19–20 did not meet the requirements for drinking water of the highest category because they exceeded the MPC of Na, whereas samples 7 and 15 exceeded the MPC of Al and Ni, respectively. Water of the highest category was characterized by a minimum content of Mg, K, and Ca cations [55]. Samples 10, 15, and 19 matched this with their Mg content; samples 4, 7, 10, 15, and 19–23 matched with their K content; and samples 10, 11, 15, and 23 matched with their Ca content.

The concentration of Ag, As, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Re, Sb, and Tl did not exceed the detection limit (LOD) in all analyzed samples. The LOD of these elements and maximal permissible concentrations according to various standards are shown in

Table 5. The detection limits of chemical elements.

	Be	Cr	Co	As	Se	Ag	Cd	Sb	Te	Re	Tl
LOD, µg/L	0.2	1	0.2	1	10	1	0.1	0.2	2	0.1	0.1
WHO	12	50	-	10	40	-	3	20	-	-
MPC *	0.2	50	100	10	10	50	1	5	10	-	0.1
Highest category **	<0.2	<30	<100	<6	<10	<25	<1	<5	-	-	-

* SanPiN 1.2.3685-21; ** SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02.

. The exceptions were samples 1 and 8, where the Co concentrations were 4.0 and 0.30 μg/L, respectively. All water samples met the most stringent requirements of SanPiN 2.1.4.1116-02 for these parameters.

The results of chemical composition of spring waters are in good agreement with respect to the content of macro-components both with the previously obtained data [59] and with the chemical composition of springs located at the same latitude and similar relief [60,61,62].

In general, most of the studied springs of the Kola Peninsula are sources of ultra-fresh waters with a salinity of less than 0.2 g/L.

Table 6. Springs’ compliance with the standards.

Area	MPC	Drinking Water of the First Category	Drinking Water of the Highest Category
Murmansk and Kola district	4, 7	4, 7	-
Monchegork district	9, 10, 11, 12, 14	9, 10, 11, 12, 14	10 (11 *)
Kandalaksha district	16, 18	16, 18	-
Apatity-Kirovsk district	21, 22, 23, 24	21, 22, 23, 24	-
Totally (24 springs)	13	13	1 (2 *)

* slightly lower in the required indicators for Mg and K.

shows the number of springs that correspond to the MPC standards for the analyzed parameters and meet the requirements for drinking water of the first and highest categories according to this classification [55].

The chemical composition of the spring waters showed that some sources did not meet the requirements for the MPCs in SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 but are in demand among the population, which is extremely dangerous and can negatively affect their health. Springs 1, 15 and 20 should be noted as especially hazardous, since a significant excess of MPC for Al, Mn and Al, respectively, was found in their waters. However, at least one or several springs can be recommended near each large settlement. Based on the data set obtained, and given the low waters salinity, the most preferred for drinking are spring 4 for the Murmansk and Kola district, spring 11 for the Monchegorsk district, spring 16 for the Kandalaksha district, and spring 24 for the Apatity-Kirovsk district.

In general, springs are better protected from the urban and industry negative effect in comparison with surface waters. Nevertheless, seasonal pollution by surface waters in the Arctic region is possible, which is most pronounced during the period of snow melting [63]. Therefore, regular monitoring of all springs used as the source of drinking water is required.

The results and conclusions of this study will be posted on Yandex.Disk, which will be available via the link and QR code placed near each spring (Figure 4). By selecting the folder with the corresponding spring number, people will be able to find information on the chemical composition of the water of each studied spring.

4. Conclusions

The water chemical composition of 24 of the most popular springs near the largest cities of the Murmansk region in Russia were analyzed. Almost half of them did not meet the requirements of drinking water for the determined parameters. Basically, the waters of the region did not correspond to the Russian, European, and US standards in terms of pH, but also, in some springs, significant excess in the concentrations of aluminum and manganese were recorded. The results of the chemical analysis showed that 13 out of 24 investigated springs were potable and corresponded to water of the first category, according to Russian hygienic standards. Finally, the water from one of the sources even met the requirements for water of the highest category. Nevertheless, the regular monitoring of springs used by the population as the source of drinking water, especially for the content of potentially toxic and hazardous microelements, is needed due to the change in groundwater chemical composition after snow melting and the anthropogenic pressure in the industrialized Arctic region.