Next Article in Journal
Purification of Industrial Copper Electrolyte from Bismuth Impurity
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on the Preparation of Sinter for COREX Reduction Process by Varying Basicity and MgO Content
Previous Article in Journal
Recovery of Rare Earth Metals (REMs) from Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries of Electric Vehicles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/min12010035
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Short Review of the Effect of Iron Ore Selection on Mineral Phases of Iron Ore Sinter

by
Junwoo Park
,
Eunju Kim
,
In-kook Suh
and
Joonho Lee
*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010035
Submission received: 3 November 2021 / Revised: 22 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 25 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineralogy of Iron Ore Sinters, Volume II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The sintering process is a thermal agglomeration process, and it is accompanied by chemical reactions. In this process, a mixture of iron ore fines, flux, and coal particles is heated to about 1300 °C–1480 °C in a sinter bed. The strength and reducibility properties of iron ore sinter are obtained by liquid phase sintering. The silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) is the main bonding phase found in modern iron ore sinters. Since the physicochemical and crystallographic properties of the SFCA are affected by the chemical composition and mineral phases of iron ores, a crystallographic understanding of iron ores and sintered ore is important to enhance the quality of iron ore sinter. Scrap and by-products from steel mills are expected to be used in the iron ore sintering process as recyclable resources, and in such a case, the crystallographic properties of iron ore sinter will be affected using these materials. The objective of this paper is to present a short review on research related to mineral phases and structural properties of iron ore and sintered ore.

1. Introduction

A crystallographic understanding of iron ores and sintered ore is necessary to produce qualified iron ore sinter. In most Asian countries, iron ore sinters used in ironmaking are produced by mixing iron ores originating from different deposits around the world, such as those in Australia, Brazil, China, and India [1]. During the sintering process, iron ore, flux, and coal particles are mixed together and heated to about 1300 °C–1480 °C in a sinter bed [2,3,4,5,6]. The strength of the iron ore sinter is obtained by calcium ferrite liquid phase sintering. Since iron ores used for producing iron ore sinter can have different chemical compositions and crystallographic characteristics, a crystallographic understanding of iron ores and sintered ore is necessary to guarantee the quality of iron ore sinter. In particular, as demand for the recycling of metallic resources is increasing, the utilization of steel scrap as well as by-products of steel mills is increasing [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Against this scenario, crystallographic studies of iron ore sinter containing recycled metallic materials have acquired increased relevance.
Iron ore sinter has a complex microstructure and comprises hematite, magnetite, silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA), dicalcium silicate (C2S), etc. The fraction of each phase is determined by the total composition, thermal history, and gas atmosphere during the reaction [13,14,15], and phase identification and quantitative analysis are performed using automated image analysis, reflected light microscopy, electron probe microanalysis, and Rietveld analysis method [16]. Among them, the Rietveld analysis method would be the most reasonable method for quantitative phase analysis (QPA) and obtaining crystal structure information since image analysis methods are based on limited 2D information. Hamilton et al. introduced the Rietveld method for the first time in their analysis of a single crystal of SFCA X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns [17]. Recently, Webster et al. investigated the phase transition of iron ore sinter and the formation mechanism of SFCA at high temperatures using in situ synchrotron XRD and QPA [14,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Many researchers have used the Rietveld method for the analysis of iron ore and iron ore sinter. In this study, the types of phases and structural characteristics of sintered ore were investigated, and they are systematically reviewed here.

2. Mineralogical Analysis of Iron Ores

Various types of iron ores are produced around the world. Table 1 presents mine production and reserves reported by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in 2021 [1]. According to the USGS’s report, global iron ore production reached 2.4 billion tons, mainly from Australia, Brazil, China, and India. Furthermore, iron ore reserves in the world have been estimated at 180 billion tons, with Australia, Brazil, Russia, and China having the most reserves. The difference in the ranking of production and reserves is because of the geographical location of mines and the ease of transportation.
The quality of raw iron ores is determined mainly based on chemical composition. In particular, the higher the total Fe content, the higher the iron ore grade. Furthermore, low amounts of gangue materials and impurities also result in a high grade. In the present study, the chemical composition of three typical iron ores, namely Mining Area C (MAC), Yandi, and Carajás (supplied by Hyundai Steel), was investigated. Table 2 lists the chemical composition of iron ores produced in various countries [2,4,24,25,26,27]. The total Fe content of iron ore varies from 31 to 69 wt%. SiO2 and Al2O3 are mainly present as gangue components in iron ore, and their content is in the range 0.35–56 and 0.23–6.5 wt%, respectively. Furthermore, sulfur and phosphorus concentrations are in the range of 0.001–0.3 and 0.004–0.87 wt%, respectively. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the chemical composition of iron ores between different countries. High-grade iron ores with total Fe content exceeding 60 wt% [28] are found in Brazil, Canada, and Uganda. In the case of Australia, India, the United States, and Russia, the ore grade is around 60 wt%. In particular, iron ores found in China have a disadvantage in terms of the total Fe content, apart from typically having high SiO2, phosphorus, and sulfur content. Iron ores from China may also contain TiO2, which may cause TiC formation during blast furnace operation [29]. These geological characteristics of Chinese iron ore originate from the nature of banded iron formation (BIF) [2,4]; in low-rainfall areas, the ore remains unenriched and therefore contains high concentrations of impurities. Iron ores from India and Uganda are characterized by high total Fe and Al2O3 content. In iron ores from Russia, phosphorus and sulfur content are relatively high. Steel mills blend various iron ores to obtain sintered ore of uniform quality.
Iron ore comprises various mineral phases, which can be categorized into ore and gangue minerals. Typical ore and gangue mineral phases are summarized in Table 3. Hematite, magnetite, and goethite are known to be major ore minerals. SiO2 and Al2O3 are major components of gangue materials, such as quartz, kaolinite, and gibbsite. In the present study, Carajás, Yandi, and MAC ores (typical iron ores) were examined using Rietveld analysis and XRD results to determine their mineral phases. Figure 2 shows the XRD and Rietveld analysis results. Table 4 presents the fraction of each phase. Carajás contained 68.11 wt% hematite, 28.95 wt% goethite, and 2.97 wt% quartz. Phases that were present in small amounts were not detected in XRD measurements. By contrast, goethite (77.52 wt%) was the most abundant mineral phase in Yandi. MAC also showed high goethite content (64.1 wt%). Goethite has high loss on ignition (LOI) content, which results in additional energy consumption to remove H2O. During the selection of iron ores, apart from the chemical composition, mineral phases should also be considered.

3. Phase Analysis of Iron Ore Sinter

A blend of iron ores, limestone, and coal was subjected to combustion to obtain iron ore sinter. Figure 3 shows a schematic of the thermal history and formation mechanism of the iron ore sinter. First, CO2 was removed from limestone by calcination, which yielded CaO. CaO reacted with iron oxides to form calcium ferrites (CF [30], C2F [31], CFA [18], SFCA [17], SFCA-I [32], SFCA-II [33], Fe-rich SFCA [18], etc.), in which gangue materials were assimilated [14,18,20,21,34]. As the sintering temperature reached the maximum, which was in the range of 1300–1480 °C, a liquid phase was formed [2,4,35,36]. The liquid phase served as a binding material between residual iron oxide particles. When the iron ore sinter was cooled, SFCA, SFCA-I, and other calcium ferrites were formed [37,38,39]; dicalcium silicate, alumina, quartz, and glass were also present as minor mineral phases. SFCA in the iron ore sinter appeared in different forms (columnar, acicular, prismatic, platy, etc.), depending on the cooling rate. Most of the sinter quality (reducibility and degradation degree) was affected by the amount and shape of SFCA [35,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. As the cooling rate increased, the fractions of columnar and platy type (SFCA, SFCA-I) increased [39]. Furthermore, the fraction of columnar type increased with the Al2O3 content. Because of the increase in SFCA and SFCA-I, the reducibility of the iron ore sinter improved. MgO inhibited the formation of SFCA [48]. On the other hand, LOI reduced the sintering temperature [49] and thereby decreased the amount of SFCA formed in the iron ore sinter [39]. Some parts of hematite particles were reduced to magnetite during the sintering process, and they were reoxidized during the cooling process, resulting in the formation of secondary hematite. Table 5 shows a compilation of chemical compositions and phase fractions of typical iron ore sinters from the literature.
Figure 4a shows a typical electron microscope image of the cross-section of a synthetic iron ore sinter reported by Park et al. [50]. Here, SFCA shows a columnar morphology, and it was formed between residual hematite particles. The dark gray color denotes dicalcium silicate (C2S). Figure 5 shows the Rietveld analysis result for sample #6. The sample contained 47.4 wt% SFCA, 29.9 wt% Fe2O3, 7.2 wt% Fe3O4, 9.1 wt% C2S, 3.7 wt% FeO, and 1.6 wt% Al2O3. Other types of calcium ferrites were not detected. Accordingly, it is considered that Rietveld analysis provides detailed information of phase fractions better than the conventional image analysis technique [51,52,53,54]. On the other hand, Figure 4b shows a typical photomicrograph of SFCA-I [36]. Apparently, SFCA-I has a platy microstructure that is finer than the microstructure of SFCA.
In Table 5, chemical compositions and phase fractions of iron ore sinters are listed; the chemical compositions and fractions were determined through Rietveld analysis [50,55,56]. Figure 6 shows the effects of basicity (CaO/SiO2) and Al2O3 content on the SFCA fraction in the iron ore sinter. With increasing basicity or Al2O3 content, the SFCA fraction increased. However, to obtain a suitable microstructure of the iron ore sinter, the basicity and Al2O3 content should be optimized.

4. Chemical Composition of SFCA

In industrial sinters, SFCA has a wide variation of chemical compositions [6,15,17,57,58,59,60,61]. It is useful to use a pseudo-quaternary phase diagram, generally termed as “CCC plane” (Figure 7), to describe a stable composition range for SFCA [17,58,59,60,62]. Inoue and Ikeda [58] suggested a substitution plane of the end members CaO∙3Fe2O3–CaO∙3Al2O3–CaO∙SiO2. Dawson et al. [59] reported the substitution plane as CaO∙2Fe2O3–CaO∙2Al2O3–CaO∙3SiO2, while Hamilton et al. [17] used the CaO∙3Fe2O3–CaO∙3Al2O3–4CaO∙3SiO2 plane, which was accepted by Patrick and Pownceby [62].
Patrick and Powenceby considered that the chemical substitution reaction was as follows:
2(Fe3+,Al3+) = (Ca2+,Fe2+) + Si4+.
Here, since a unit cell is considered, a decrease in the number of ions on the left side (Fe3+ or Al3+) should be identical to the increase in the number of ions on the right side (Ca2+, Fe2+, or Si4+). This relationship was confirmed by wet chemical analysis, as shown in Figure 8 [62].
Recently, Murao et al. developed a modified quasi-chemical model to describe the thermodynamic property of SFCA [63]. A typical phase diagram of the CaO∙3Fe2O3–CaO∙3Al2O3–4CaO∙3SiO2 plane is shown in Figure 9. Clearly, the calculated phase diagram is in reasonable agreement with experimental data.

5. Crystalline Structure Analysis of SFCA

Rietveld analysis is used to determine crystalline characteristics by matching a theoretical line to a measured XRD profile. SFCA has a triclinic space group and comprises 14 metal atoms and 20 oxygen atoms. Each metal atom is located at an octahedral or a tetrahedral site and is bound to an oxygen atom [17]. Figure 10 shows a schematic of the crystal structure of SFCA; spinel and pyroxene planes are stacked alternately. The unit cell of SFCA has the lattice parameters a = 9.061 Å, b = 10.020 Å, and c = 10.920 Å (Table 6). Metal atom positions can be categorized as octahedral and tetrahedral sites: Ca2+, Fe2+, and Mg2+ occupy octahedral sites (M1, M2, M3, M7, M10, and M11), while Si4+, Fe3+, and Al3+ occupy tetrahedral sites (M4, M5, M6, M8, M9, and M12). The tetrahedral sites can be categorized into three groups: (1) Fe and Al substitution occurs at the M6 site, (2) Si and Al substitution occurs at the M12 site, and (3) Ca and Fe substitution occurs at the Ca1 site. Sugiyama et al. suggested a Mg-rich SFCAM crystal structure, which was different from the conventional SFCA structure [64,65]. Further studies are required regarding the crystal structure information of Mg-rich SFCAM.
Recently, Park et al. reported the substitution of Zn at the M12 site in SFCA [50]. They used information on Hamilton’s crystal structure parameters to evaluate the atom occupancy variation. Figure 11 shows metallic atom occupancy changes at the M12 site as a function of the basicity and those at the M6 site with respect to the initial composition of Al2O3. As the basicity of SFCA increases, Fe occupancy of the M12 site increases, while Si occupancy decreases. When the Al2O3 concentration increases, the Fe occupancy of the M6 site decreases, while Al occupancy increases.

6. Conclusions

In this study, different types of phases and structural characteristics of sintered iron ore were investigated and systematically reviewed. In 2021, global iron ore production reached 2.4 billion tons, with the main producers being Australia, Brazil, China, and India. The total Fe content of iron ore varies from 31 to 69 wt%. Generally, iron ore with total Fe content exceeding about 60 wt% is usually called high-grade iron ore. SiO2 and Al2O3 are gangue components in iron ore, and their content ranges are 0.35–56 and 0.23–6.5 wt%, respectively. To ensure that the sintered ore they use is of uniform quality, steel mills mix various iron ores. In this study, phases of three typical iron ores (Carajás, Yandi, and MAC) were investigated through Rietveld analysis of XRD results. Hematite, goethite, and quartz were found to be the main mineral phases. Hematite was found in Carajás, and goethite in Yandi and MAC was highest. These ores were mixed to produce a sintered ore, and calcium ferrite melt was formed during the sintering process. The calcium ferrite melt bound iron oxide particles. Some hematite particles were reduced to magnetite during the sintering process, and some were reoxidized during the cooling process to form secondary hematite. In the sintered iron ore, dicalcium silicate, alumina, quartz, and glass were present as minor mineral phases. Calcium ferrite reacted with gangue components to form SFCA. SFCA in the iron ore sinter had columnar or acicular morphology, depending on the cooling rate. Furthermore, the SFCA fraction increased as the basicity or alumina concentration of the sintered iron ore increased. SFCA has a triclinic structure and can be represented as a CA3–CF3–C3S4 pseudo ternary system. The positions of metallic atoms in SFCA are determined by the substitution reaction 2(Fe3+, Al3+) ↔ (Ca2+, Fe2+) + Si4+. As the basicity of SFCA increases, Fe occupancy of the M12 site increases, while Si occupancy decreases. As the alumina concentration increases, Fe occupancy of the M6 site decreases, while Al occupancy was increases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.; methodology, J.P.; software, J.P. and E.K.; validation, J.P., E.K. and I.-k.S.; formal analysis, J.P.; investigation, J.P.; resources, J.P. and E.K.; data curation, J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.; writing—review and editing, J.P. and I.-k.S.; visualization, J.P.; supervision, J.L.; project administration, J.L.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy in Korea (20212010100060) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (P0002019).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy in Korea, and the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (20212010100060, Development of reduction technology of carbon dioxide from iron making process based on alternative iron source), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy in Korea. J.P. and E.K. were supported by the Competency Development Program for Industry Specialists of Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (grant no. P0002019) in Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. USGS. Iron Ore Statistics and Information. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2021/mcs2021-iron-ore.pdf (accessed on 24 December 2021).
  2. Wakelin, D.H. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel: Ironmaking Volume; AISE Steel Foundation: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisele, T.C.; Kawatra, S.K. A review of binders in iron ore pelletization. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. Rev. 2003, 24, 1–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, L.; Ishiyama, O. 2-Iron ore sintering. In Iron Ore; Lu, L., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Southton, UK, 2015; pp. 45–84. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mežibrický, R.; Fröhlichová, M.; Findorák, R.; Goettgens, V.S. Ore Assimilation and Secondary Phases by Sintering of Rich and High-Gangue Iron Ores. Minerals 2019, 9, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Heikkinen, E.-P.; Iljana, M.; Fabritius, T. Review on the Phase Equilibria in Iron Ore Sinters. ISIJ Int. 2020, 60, 2633–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Makkonen, H.T.; Heino, J.; Laitila, L.; Hiltunen, A.; Pöyliö, E.; Härkki, J. Optimisation of steel plant recycling in Finland: Dusts, scales and sludge. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2002, 35, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hleis, D.; Fernández-Olmo, I.; Ledoux, F.; Kfoury, A.; Courcot, L.; Desmonts, T.; Courcot, D. Chemical profile identification of fugitive and confined particle emissions from an integrated iron and steelmaking plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 250–251, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lobato, N.C.C.; Villegas, E.A.; Mansur, M.B. Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: A brief review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 102, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lanzerstorfer, C.; Bamberger-Strassmayr, B.; Pilz, K. Recycling of Blast Furnace Dust in the Iron Ore Sintering Process: Investigation of Coke Breeze Substitution and the Influence on Off-gas Emissions. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lanzerstorfer, C. Electric arc furnace (EAF) dust: Application of air classification for improved zinc enrichment in in-plant recycling. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lv, W.; Gan, M.; Fan, X.; Ji, Z.; Chen, X.; Yao, J.; Jiang, T. Recycling Utilization of Zinc-Bearing Metallurgical Dust by Reductive Sintering: Reaction Behavior of Zinc Oxide. JOM 2019, 71, 3173–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jeon, J.-W.; Jung, S.-M.; Sasaki, Y. Formation of Calcium Ferrites under Controlled Oxygen Potentials at 1273 K. ISIJ Int. 2010, 50, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Webster, N.; Pownceby, M.; Madsen, I.C.; Kimpton, J.A. Effect of Oxygen Partial Pressure on the Formation Mechanisms of Complex Ca-rich Ferrites. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, C.; Lu, L.; Jiao, K. Thermodynamic Modelling of Iron Ore Sintering Reactions. Minerals 2019, 9, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Honeyands, T.; Manuel, J.; Matthews, L.; O’Dea, D.; Pinson, D.; Leedham, J.; Monaghan, B.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Hayes, P. Characterising the mineralogy of iron ore sinters—State-of-the-art in Australia. Proc. Iron Ore 2017, 49–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamilton, J.G.; Hoskins, B.; Mumme, W.; Borbidge, W.; Montague, M. The crystal structure and crystal chemistry of Ca2. 3Mg0. 8Al1. 5Si1. 1Fe8. 3O20 (SFCA): Solid solution limits and selected phase relationships of SFCA in the SiO2-FeO3-CaO (-Al2O3) system. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie. Abhandlungen 1989, 161, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  18. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.; Madsen, I.C.; Kimpton, J.A. Silico-ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phases: New Insights into Their Formation During Heating and Cooling. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2012, 43, 1344–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Webster, N.; Pownceby, M.; Madsen, I.C. In situ X-ray Diffraction Investigation of the Formation Mechanisms of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminium-I-type (SFCA-I-type) Complex Calcium Ferrites. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 1334–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.; Madsen, I.C.; Studer, A.J.; Manuel, J.R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) and SFCA-I Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phase Formation: Effects of CaO:SiO2 Ratio. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2014, 45, 2097–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Webster, N.A.S.; O’Dea, D.P.; Ellis, B.G.; Pownceby, M.I. Effects of Gibbsite, Kaolinite and Al-rich Goethite as Alumina Sources on Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminium (SFCA) and SFCA-I Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phase Formation. ISIJ Int. 2017, 57, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.; Pattel, R.; Manuel, J.R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminium (SFCA) Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phase Formation: Effects of Basicity and Magnesium on Crystallisation during Cooling. ISIJ Int. 2019, 59, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.; Pattel, R.; Manuel, J.R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminium (SFCA) Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phase Formation: Effects of Titanium on Crystallisation during Cooling. ISIJ Int. 2019, 59, 1007–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Biswas, A. Principles of Blast Furnace Iron Making; Cootha: Calcutta, India, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cores, A.; Babich, A.; Muniz, M.; Isidro, A.; Ferreira, S.; Martin, R. Iron ores, fluxes and tuyere injected coals used in the blast furnace. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2007, 34, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muwanguzi, A.J.B.; Karasev, A.V.; Byaruhanga, J.K.; Jönsson, P.G. Characterization of Chemical Composition and Microstructure of Natural Iron Ore from Muko Deposits. ISRN Mater. Sci. 2012, 2012, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Song, S.-X.; Campos-Toro, E.F.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Lopez-Valdivieso, A. Morphological and mineralogical characterizations of oolitic iron ore in the Exi region, China. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2013, 20, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Geerdes, M.; Toxopeus, H.; van der Vliet, C.; Chaigneau, R.; Vander, T.; Wise, J. Modern Blast Furnace Ironmaking: An Introduction; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liao, J.L.; Li, J.; Wang, X.D.; Zhang, Z.T. Influence of TiO2 and basicity on viscosity of Ti bearing slag. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2012, 39, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Decker, B.F.; Kasper, J.S. The structure of calcium ferrite. Acta Crystallogr. 1957, 10, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Millon, E.; Malaman, B.; Bonazebi, A.; Brice, J.; Gerardin, R.; Evrard, O. Structure cristalline du ferrite hemicalcique CaFe4O7. Mater. Res. Bull. 1986, 21, 985–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mumme, W.G.; Clout, J.M.F.; Gable, R.W. The crystal structure of SFCA-I, Ca3.18 Fe3+14.66Al1.34 Fe2+0.82O28, a homologue of the aenigmatite structure type, and new crystal structure refinements of ß-CFF, Ca2.99Fe3+14.30Fe2+0.55O25 and Mg-free SFCA, Ca2.45Fe3+9.04 Al1.74Fe2+0.16Si0.6O20. Neues Jahrb. Für Mineral. Abh. 1998, 173, 93–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mumme, W.G. The crystal structure of SFCA-II, Ca5. 1Al9. 3Fe3+ 18.7 Fe2+ 0.9 O48 a new homologue of the aenigmatite structure-type, and structure refinement of SFCA-type, Ca2Al5Fe7O20. Implications for the nature of the “ternary-phase solid-solution” previously reported in the CaO-Al2O3-iron oxide system. Neues Jahrb. Fur Mineral. Abh. 2003, 178, 307–335. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liao, F.; Guo, X.-M. The Effects of Al2O3 and SiO2 on the Formation Process of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) by Solid-State Reactions. Minerals 2019, 9, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fernández-González, D.; Ruiz-Bustinza, I.; Mochón, J.; González-Gasca, C.; Verdeja, L.F. Iron Ore Sintering: Quality Indices. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. Rev. 2017, 38, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nicol, S.; Chen, J.; Pownceby, M.; Webster, N.A.S. A Review of the Chemistry, Structure and Formation Conditions of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (‘SFCA’) Phases. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 2157–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Park, T.J.; Choi, J.S.; Min, D.J. In Situ Observation of Crystallization in CaO-Fe2O3 System with Different Cooling Rates and Chemical Compositions Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 2174–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, T.J.; Choi, J.S.; Min, D.J. Investigation of the Effects of Al2O3 Content and Cooling Rate on Crystallization in Fe2O3–CaO–Al2O3 System Using In Situ Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Steel Res. Int. 2019, 90, 1900001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harvey, T.; Pownceby, M.I.; Chen, J.; Webster, N.A.S.; Nguyen, T.B.T.; Matthews, L.; O’Dea, D.; Honeyands, T. Effect of Temperature, Time, and Cooling Rate on the Mineralogy, Morphology, and Reducibility of Iron Ore Sinter Analogues. JOM 2021, 73, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taguchi, N.; Otomo, T.; Tasaka, K. Reduction process of CaO-Fe2O3 binary calcium ferrite and resultant expansion. Tetsu-to-Hagané 1983, 69, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Maeda, T.; Ono, Y. Kinetics of Reduction Step of Wustite to Iron in Gaseous Reduction of Quaternary Calcium Ferrite. Tetsu-to-Hagane 1991, 77, 1569–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matsumura, M.; Hoshi, M.; Kawaguchi, T. Improvement of Sinter Softening Property and Reducibility by Controlling Chemical Compositions. ISIJ Int. 2005, 45, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Murakami, T.; Kodaira, T.; Kasai, E. Effect of the Reduction of Calcium Ferrite on Disintegration Behavior of Sinter under High Hydrogen Atmosphere. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pownceby, M.I.; Webster, N.; Manuel, J.R.; Ware, N. The influence of ore composition on sinter phase mineralogy and strength. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. 2016, 125, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cai, B.; Watanabe, T.; Kamijo, C.; Susa, M.; Hayashi, M. Comparison between Reducibilities of Columnar Silico-ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) Covered with Slag and Acicular SFCA with Fine Pores. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ji, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Gan, M.; Fan, X.; Chen, X.; Hu, L. Microstructure and Minerals Evolution of Iron Ore Sinter: Influence of SiO2 and Al2O3. Minerals 2019, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kato, K.; Konishi, H.; Ono, H.; Fujimoto, S.; Koizumi, Y. Influence of CaO/SiO2 on the Reduction Behavior of Sintered Fe2O3–CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 Tablets at the Softening and Melting Temperatures. ISIJ Int. 2020, 60, 1479–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.I.; Manuel, J.R.; Pattel, R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of Silico-Ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) and SFCA-I Iron Ore Sinter Bonding Phase Formation: Effects of MgO on Phase Formation During Heating. JOM 2021, 73, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, D.; Xue, Y.; Pan, J.; Yang, C.; Guo, Z.; Tian, H.; Wang, D.; Shi, Y. An investigation into aluminum occurrence impact on SFCA formation and sinter matrix strength. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 10223–10234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, J.; Rajavaram, R.; Suh, I.-K.; Jeon, J.; Son, S.; Lee, J. Effects of Basicity and Al2O3 Content on the Chemistry of Phases in Iron Ore Sinter Containing ZnO. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 3016–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Greco, A.; Jeulin, D.; Serra, J. The Use Of The Texture Analyser To Study Sinter Structure: Application To The Morphology Of Calcium Ferrites Encountered In Basic Sinters Of Rich Iron Ores. J. Microsc. 1979, 116, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Z.; Pinson, D.; Chew, S.; Monaghan, B.; Pownceby, M.; Webster, N.; Rogers, H.; Zhang, G. Effects of Sintering Materials and Gas Conditions on Formation of Silico-Ferrites of Calcium and Aluminium during Iron Ore Sintering. ISIJ Int. 2016, 56, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Zhu, D.; Chou, J.; Shi, B.; Pan, J. Influence of MgO on Low Temperature Reduction and Mineralogical Changes of Sinter in Simulated COREX Shaft Furnace Reducing Conditions. Minerals 2019, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Honeyands, T.; Manuel, J.; Matthews, L.; O’Dea, D.; Pinson, D.; Leedham, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, H.; Monaghan, B.; Liu, X.; et al. Comparison of the Mineralogy of Iron Ore Sinters Using a Range of Techniques. Minerals 2019, 9, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Higuchi, K.; Naito, M.; Nakano, M.; Takamoto, Y. Optimization of Chemical Composition and Microstructure of Iron Ore Sinter for Low-temperature Drip of Molten Iron with High Permeability. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Takayama, T.; Murao, R.; Kimura, M. Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Phases in Iron-ore Sinter by the Rietveld Method of X-ray Diffraction Patterns. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 1069–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hancart, J.; Leroy, V.; Bragard, A. A study of the phases present in blast furnace sinter. Some considerations on the mechanism of their formation. CNRM Metall. Rep. 1967, 11, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  58. Inoue, K.; Ikeda, T. The Solid Solution State and the Crystal Structure of Calcium Ferrite Formed in Lime-fluxed Iron Ores. Tetsu-to-Hagane 1982, 68, 2190–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dawson, P.; Ostwald, J.; Hayes, K. Calcium ferrites in the new low-silica sintering technology. BHP Tech. Bull. 1983, 27, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pownceby, M.I.; Patrick, T.R. Stability of SFC (silico-ferrite of calcium) solid solution limits, thermal stability and selected phase relationships within the Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2 (FCS) system. Eur. J. Mineral. 2000, 12, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Koryttseva, A.; Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamic stability of SFCA (silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum) and SFCA-I phases. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 3646–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Patrick, T.R.C.; Pownceby, M.I. Stability of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) in air-solid solution limits between 1240 °C and 1390 °C and phase relationships within the Fe2O3-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 (FCAS) system. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2002, 33, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Murao, R.; Harano, T.; Kimura, M.; Jung, I.-H. Thermodynamic Modeling of the SFCA Phase Ca2(Fe, Ca)6(Fe, Al, Si)6O20. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Mumme, W.G. A note on the relationship of Ca2, 3Mg0, 8Al1, 5Si1, 1Fe8, 3O20 (SFCA) with aenigmatie group minerals and sapphirine. Neues Jahrb. Fur Mineral. Abh. 1988, 1988, 359–366. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sugiyama, K.; Monkawa, A.; Sugiyama, T. Crystal Structure of the SFCAM Phase Ca2(Ca, Fe, Mg, Al)6(Fe, Al, Si)6O20. ISIJ Int. 2005, 45, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Minerals 12 00035 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of chemical compositions of iron ores in different nations: (a) Total Fe, (b) SiO2, (c) Al2O3, (d) S, and (e) P content.
Figure 1. Comparison of chemical compositions of iron ores in different nations: (a) Total Fe, (b) SiO2, (c) Al2O3, (d) S, and (e) P content.
Minerals 12 00035 g001
Minerals 12 00035 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns and Rietveld analysis results: (a) Carajás ore, (b) Yandi ore, and (c) Mining Area C ore (▲: Hematite; ○: Goethite; □: Quartz).
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns and Rietveld analysis results: (a) Carajás ore, (b) Yandi ore, and (c) Mining Area C ore (▲: Hematite; ○: Goethite; □: Quartz).
Minerals 12 00035 g002
Minerals 12 00035 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic of the formation mechanism of the microstructure of iron ore sinter. Modified from Jeon et al. [13].
Figure 3. Schematic of the formation mechanism of the microstructure of iron ore sinter. Modified from Jeon et al. [13].
Minerals 12 00035 g003
Minerals 12 00035 g004 550
Figure 4. Cross-sectional image and an electron micrograph of the synthetic iron ore sinter [36,50]: (a) Sample #8 in Table 5 [50] (V: void; H: hematite; S: silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA); C2S: dicalcium silicate) and (b) the SFCA-I matrix texture [36].
Figure 4. Cross-sectional image and an electron micrograph of the synthetic iron ore sinter [36,50]: (a) Sample #8 in Table 5 [50] (V: void; H: hematite; S: silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA); C2S: dicalcium silicate) and (b) the SFCA-I matrix texture [36].
Minerals 12 00035 g004
Minerals 12 00035 g005 550
Figure 5. Examples of an XRD pattern and a Rietveld analysis result for a synthetic iron ore sinter (Sample #6 in Table 5; ○: Fe2O3; ●: Fe3O4; ◇: SFCA; △: C2S; ◎: FeO; ■: Al2O3) [50].
Figure 5. Examples of an XRD pattern and a Rietveld analysis result for a synthetic iron ore sinter (Sample #6 in Table 5; ○: Fe2O3; ●: Fe3O4; ◇: SFCA; △: C2S; ◎: FeO; ■: Al2O3) [50].
Minerals 12 00035 g005
Minerals 12 00035 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of (a) basicity (CaO/SiO2) and (b) Al2O3 content on the SFCA fraction in the iron ore sinter.
Figure 6. Effects of (a) basicity (CaO/SiO2) and (b) Al2O3 content on the SFCA fraction in the iron ore sinter.
Minerals 12 00035 g006
Minerals 12 00035 g007 550
Figure 7. Previously proposed compositional planes for SFCA in the Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaO–SiO2 system. The shaded area shows the SFCA compositions in industrial iron ore sinters [62].
Figure 7. Previously proposed compositional planes for SFCA in the Fe2O3–Al2O3–CaO–SiO2 system. The shaded area shows the SFCA compositions in industrial iron ore sinters [62].
Minerals 12 00035 g007
Minerals 12 00035 g008 550
Figure 8. Plot of Ca2+ + Fe2+ + Si4+ (a.p.f.u.) vs. Fe3+ + Al3+ (a.p.f.u.) for various SFCA compositions [62].
Figure 8. Plot of Ca2+ + Fe2+ + Si4+ (a.p.f.u.) vs. Fe3+ + Al3+ (a.p.f.u.) for various SFCA compositions [62].
Minerals 12 00035 g008
Minerals 12 00035 g009 550
Figure 9. Isothermal phase diagrams of the CA3–CF3–C3S4 system, calculated using a thermodynamic model at 1573 K (filled circles: experimental data points for single-phase SFCA reported by Murao et al. [63]; filled circles: mixtures of SFCA and a meta-stable phase reported by Murao et al. [63]; open circles: a mixture of SFCA and other phases reported by Patrick and Pownceby [62]).
Figure 9. Isothermal phase diagrams of the CA3–CF3–C3S4 system, calculated using a thermodynamic model at 1573 K (filled circles: experimental data points for single-phase SFCA reported by Murao et al. [63]; filled circles: mixtures of SFCA and a meta-stable phase reported by Murao et al. [63]; open circles: a mixture of SFCA and other phases reported by Patrick and Pownceby [62]).
Minerals 12 00035 g009
Minerals 12 00035 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic of the crystal structure of SFCA in the polyhedral model (with the ball and stick model) indicating the sequence of spinel (S) and pyroxene (P), and the atom substitution position of the tetrahedral ((Si, Al)O4, (Fe, Al)O4) and octahedral ((Ca, Fe)O6) sites according to Table 7.
Figure 10. Schematic of the crystal structure of SFCA in the polyhedral model (with the ball and stick model) indicating the sequence of spinel (S) and pyroxene (P), and the atom substitution position of the tetrahedral ((Si, Al)O4, (Fe, Al)O4) and octahedral ((Ca, Fe)O6) sites according to Table 7.
Minerals 12 00035 g010
Minerals 12 00035 g011 550
Figure 11. Atom occupancy changes at M12 and M6 sites (a) as a function of the basicity and (b) relative to the initial composition of Al2O3 [50].
Figure 11. Atom occupancy changes at M12 and M6 sites (a) as a function of the basicity and (b) relative to the initial composition of Al2O3 [50].
Minerals 12 00035 g011
Table
Table 1. World mine production and reserves [1] (USGS, 2021 annual report).
Table 1. World mine production and reserves [1] (USGS, 2021 annual report).
Mine Production
(Thousand Metric Tons)		Reserves
(Million Metric Tons)
Australia900,000 (1) *50,000 (1)
Brazil400,000 (2)34,000 (2)
China340,000(3)20,000 (4)
India230,000 (4)5500 (6)
Russia95,000 (5)25,000 (3)
South Africa71,000 (6)1000 (8)
Canada57,000 (7)6000 (5)
United state37,000 (8)3000 (7)
World total2,400,000180,000
* Rankings are listed in ( ).
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of iron ores in different nations.
Table 2. Chemical composition of iron ores in different nations.
MineNationChemical Composition (Mass %)
Total FeSiO2Al2O3SPTiO2Ref.
GoldsworthyAustralia63.24.91.6-0.035-[24]
GoldsworthyAustralia62.86.11.50.0280.0040.1[2]
HammersleyAustralia62.74.212.570.0150.0710.13[2]
HammersleyAustralia62.74.22.730.0160.059-[25]
Mt. NewmanAustralia62.55.62.60.0070.0690.11[2]
Marra MambaAustralia613.31.80.0390.0690.07[2]
Mining Area C (MAC) *Australia60.084.482.460.025-0.002Present work
YandiAustralia59.55.031.250.0130.0390.05[2]
Yandi *Australia56.926.061.530.092-0.095Present work
Irvine IslandAustralia54.421.30.230.040.01-[26]
ItabiraBrazil68.90.350.60.0100.030-[24]
MBRBrazil68.31.30.90.0050.030.04[2]
MBRBrazil67.30.790.720.0050.030-[25]
CarajásBrazil67.20.60.940.010.0370.03[2]
Carajás *Brazil65.611.770.910.011-0.088Present work
CarajásBrazil65.411.050.0100.038-[26]
Robe riverCanada57.25.62.750.0280.040.22[2]
Carol LakeCanada64.73.91-0.005-[24]
NanfenChina63.46.281.170.110--[4]
ExiChina42.622.322.70.030.87-[27]
GuanzhuangChina38.711.6-0.110.42-[4]
PanzhihuaChina33----11[4]
QidashanChina31.256-0.3<0.03-[4]
BailadilaIndia642.52.50.050.100-[26]
DonimalaiIndia63.5330.0500.080-[26]
GoaIndia57.82.56.50.0200.040-[24]
BakalRussia60.72.420.0300.004-[24]
TulaRussia52.210.11.250.1000.600-[24]
NyamiyagaUganda690.620.430.001<0.02-[26]
KyanyamuzIndaUganda68.70.410.350.0060.02-[26]
RushekyeUganda68.40.960.58<0.001<0.02-[26]
KamenaUganda67.90.80.650.0020.02-[26]
ButareUganda67.51.21<0.0010.05-[26]
KashenyiUganda60.65.160.0030.02-[26]
Reserve PelletUSA638.10.40.0030.025-[24]
MesabiUSA57.510.10.70.0100.060-[24]
MinnesotaUSA54.36.80.4-0.230-[24]
* Rietveld analysis was conducted on data.
Table
Table 3. Common ore minerals and gangue mineral phases in iron ore [4].
Table 3. Common ore minerals and gangue mineral phases in iron ore [4].
Chemical Formula
Ore MineralsGangue Minerals
HematiteFe2O3QuartzSiO2
MagnetiteFe3O4KaoliniteAl4(Si4O10)(OH)8
GoethiteFeOOHGibbsiteAl(OH)3
MaghemiteFe3+[Fe3+1.67[ ].33]O4Minnesotaite(Mg,Fe)3Si4O10(OH)2
KenomagnetiteFe3-x( )xO4Stilpnomelane(K,NA,Ca)0.6(Mg,Fe2+,Fe3+)6Si8Al(O,OH)272-4H2O
HydrohematiteFe(2-x)/3(OH)xO3-xChlorite(Fe,Al,Mg)3(Si,Al)2O5(OH)4
PyriteFeS2
PyrolusiteMnO2
SideriteFeCO3
AnkeriteCa(Fe, Mg, Mn)(CO3)2
Table
Table 4. Phase fractions of iron ores determined through Rietveld analysis (wt%).
Table 4. Phase fractions of iron ores determined through Rietveld analysis (wt%).
MineHematiteGoethiteQuartz
Carajás68.1128.952.97
Yandi20.7877.521.70
MAC33.864.12.10
Table
Table 5. Chemical compositions and phase fractions of iron ore sinters (wt%).
Table 5. Chemical compositions and phase fractions of iron ore sinters (wt%).
No.Ref.Chemical CompositionMineral Phases
T.FeSiO2Al2O3B(CaO/SiO2)HematiteMagnetiteSFCA
#1Higuchi et al. [55] *62.73.610.961.44512320
#2Higuchi et al. [55] *57.74.931.721.83282046
#3Takayama et al. [56] **58.185.491.281.7744.115.519.5
#4Takayama et al. [56] **56.516.751.291.623718.920.7
#5Takayama et al. [56] **57.396.011.451.72332321.8
#6Park et al. [50] **54.66.222.22.0929.97.247.4
#7Park et al. [50] **51.84.544.013.088.63.167.8
#8Park et al. [50] **54.63.882.484.022.21.579.2
#9Park et al. [50] **53.85.883.582.1720.47.261.2
#10Park et al. [50] **535.865.742.196.33.683.2
* Production sinter, ** Laboratory sinter.
Table
Table 6. Main parameters of the crystal structure of SFCA [17] (ICDD: 01-080-0850).
Table 6. Main parameters of the crystal structure of SFCA [17] (ICDD: 01-080-0850).
Single Crystal
a = 9.061 Å
b = 10.020 Å
c = 10.920 Å
α = 60.30°
β = 73.68°
γ = 65.81°
Table
Table 7. Atomic coordinates and occupancy values for SFCA reported by Hamilton, Takayama et al. and Park et al. [17,50,56].
Table 7. Atomic coordinates and occupancy values for SFCA reported by Hamilton, Takayama et al. and Park et al. [17,50,56].
AtomSiteHamilton
Ca2.8Fe8.7Al1.2Si0.8O20		Takayama et al.
Ca2.3Fe10.3Al0.6Si0.8O20		Park et al.
Ca1.6Fe11.3Al0.2Si0.4Zn0.4O20
M1FeFeFe
M2FeFeFe
M3FeFeFe
M4FeFeFe
M5FeFeFe
M6Al0.4 Al + 0.6 FeFe
M7FeFeFe
M8FeFeFe
M9FeFeFe
M100.5 Fe0.5 Fe0.5 Fe
M110.5 Fe0.5 Fe0.5 Fe
Ca10.8 Ca + 0.2 Fe0.3 Ca + 0.7 FeFe
Ca2CaCaCa
Ca3CaCaCa
M120.8 Si + 0.2 Al0.8 Si + 0.2 Al0.45 Si + 0.2 Al + 0.35 Zn
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.; Kim, E.; Suh, I.-k.; Lee, J. A Short Review of the Effect of Iron Ore Selection on Mineral Phases of Iron Ore Sinter. Minerals 2022, 12, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010035

AMA Style

Park J, Kim E, Suh I-k, Lee J. A Short Review of the Effect of Iron Ore Selection on Mineral Phases of Iron Ore Sinter. Minerals. 2022; 12(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Junwoo, Eunju Kim, In-kook Suh, and Joonho Lee. 2022. "A Short Review of the Effect of Iron Ore Selection on Mineral Phases of Iron Ore Sinter" Minerals 12, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop