Abstract
In this paper, we deal with a general functional equation in several variables. We prove the hyperstability of this equation in (m + 1)-normed spaces and describe its general solution in some special cases. In this way, we solve the problems posed by Ciepliński. The considered equation was introduced as a generalization of the equation characterizing n-quadratic functions and has symmetric coefficients (up to sign), and it also generalizes many other known functional equations with symmetric coefficients, such as the multi-Cauchy equation, the multi-Jensen equation, and the multi-Cauchy–Jensen equation. Our results generalize several known results.
Keywords:
functional equation; multi-quadratic mapping; Ulam stability; hyperstability; m-normed space MSC:
39B52; 39B82; 47J25
1. Introduction
The characterization of inner product spaces among normed spaces is given by the parallelogram law
which leads naturally to the following functional equation
It is known, e.g., roughly speaking, that f is a solution of the above equation if and only if there exists a symmetric biadditive mapping B such that for all x. In the case when , its regular solutions have a form and for this reason, Equation (1) is called a quadratic equation, and its solutions are called quadratic mappings (see, e.g., [1,2]).
In [3], the authors introduced a counterpart of (1) for multivariable functions:
which characterizes the so-called n-quadratic functions (quadratic in each variable). As a natural generalization of the Equation (2) was introduced and investigated in [4,5,6] the following equation
for some , where , X is a linear space over the field , and Y is a linear space over the field .
Let us also mention that some special cases of (3) (one of them is clearly (2)) have been considered for years, because putting
from (3), we obtain, for example, multi-Cauchy (4), multi-Jensen (5) and multi-Cauchy–Jensen (6) equations:
with , for others and all for all
with , for others and all for all
where is fixed, with for , for , for others and for all
Many physical processes are described by functional equations, and while modeling such processes, various deviations and errors occur. Therefore, it is natural to investigate stability problems in such situations because, considering such problems, we ask how much a slight disturbance of a state affects that state. More classical results on the Ulam stability of functional equations can be found, for example, in the monograph [7].
Over the last few decades, the Ulam stability of various objects (for example, functional equations and inequalities, as well as differential, difference, and integral equations) has been studied by many researchers (see [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] for more information on this concept as well as its applications).
Stability problems are studied in various spaces, including m-Banach spaces. Let us mention that such spaces were defined in [19] by A. Misiak.
Let and Y be an at least m-dimensional real linear space. If a mapping fulfills the following four conditions:
- (i)
- if and only if are linearly dependent,
- (ii)
- is invariant under the permutation of ,
- (iii)
- ,
- (iv)
- ,
for every and , then is called an m-norm on Y, and the pair is said to be an m-normed space.
A sequence of elements of an m-normed space is called a Cauchy sequence if
whereas is said to be convergent if there exists an element (called the limit of this sequence and denoted by ) with
An m-normed space in which every Cauchy sequence is convergent is called an m-Banach space. From the definition of the m-normed space, we immediately obtain the following well-known property
For more details, we refer the reader to [19,20,21].
In [6], the author studied the Ulam stability of a general functional equation in several variables and determined, among others, that Equation (3) is Ulam stable in m-Banach spaces. Namely, he proved (Theorem 2, [6]) the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let be a linear space, Y be an -Banach space, and
If is a mapping such that for any with at least one component which is equal to zero and
for and , then there exists a function satisfying (3) and the condition
for all and
Moreover, he posed three problems:
Problem 1.
Does the assertion of Theorem 1 hold without the assumption that for any with at least one component which is equal to zero?
Problem 2.
Is Equation (3) stable for
Problem 3.
Find a general solution of Equation (3).
In this paper, we provide positive answers to Problems 1 and 2 and describe the general solution of the Equation (3) for To answer the questions posed as Problems 1 and 2, we present a rather short proof of hyperstability Equation (3) in -normed spaces. We speak about the hyperstability phenomenon when no deviation of a state affects that state. Our result also improves a result from Theorem 1, where the stability of the Equation (3) was shown. Let us mention that the problem that was put forth in [4] about the Ulam stability of Equation (3) in 2-Banach spaces was considered in [22] (see also [20]).
By , we will understand the sets of positive integers.
2. Hyperstability of (3) in -Banach Spaces
In this section, we prove that functional Equation (3) is Ulam hyperstable in -normed spaces. In [6], the author proved Theorem 1 and showed that Equation (3) is Ulam stable in m-Banach spaces. In fact, we can obtain more, namely the hyperstability of (3) in -normed spaces, that is, we do not only obtain an approximation of f by a function satisfying the equation, but f itself has to satisfy already the equation.
Theorem 1 can be easily generalized in the following way.
Theorem 2.
Let X be a linear space, Y be an -normed space, and Assume also that is a mapping satisfying
for and Then, function f satisfies the Equation (3).
Proof.
Denote
for .
We notice that Theorem 2 gives a positive answer to both problems (for the second in -normed spaces), because if function f satisfies (9), then it must satisfy (3).
From the proof of Theorem 2, we determine that it is sufficient to assume that Y is an -normed space (in Theorem 1, Y is an -Banach space), since in the proof, we only use the property (7) that holds in -normed spaces.
Moreover, the proof of Theorem 2 shows that it can be repeated for any functional equation, and for this reason, the study of Ulam stability of functional equations (with a control function or another one independent of z) in -Banach spaces or -normed spaces seems pointless.
3. General Solution of (3) for
In this section, X and Y will denote linear spaces over the field of real or complex numbers, and unless otherwise noted, equations containing some of the variables will be considered for all variables in them.
We start with the following observation. If
then every constant function satisfies (3). Otherwise, is the only constant function satisfying (3).
3.1. General Solution of (3) for
For , we can write the Equation (3) in a very simple form
where
Now, we compare the following examples.
Example 1.
(a) Function satisfies (11) with
(b) Function satisfies (11) with
(c) Function does not satisfy (11) with any coefficients .
Theorem 3.
If a function satisfies (11), then there exist an additive function , a quadratic function , and a constant such that
and
for all and, moreover,
Proof.
Putting in (16) , and then , we obtain
respectively. Substituting for x in (17) and (18), we obtain
respectively. Subtracting Equation (20) from Equation (17), and Equation (19) from Equation (18), we have
hence,
and consequently
which means that or g is an odd function.
First, we consider the case when . Then, subtracting Equation (18) from Equation (17), we have
which means that or g is an even function.
If from the Equation (17), we have , and then Equation (16) has the form
hence,
which means that g is an additive function such that
If and g is an even function, putting in (16) , then , we obtain
respectively, and hence
Therefore the Equations (16) and (17) have the following forms
and
and hence
which means that g is a quadratic function such that
Now, we consider the case when g is an odd function. Adding Equations (17) and (18) and then Equations (17) and (20), we have
Putting the above equations into the Equation (16), we obtain
then, replacing x with y in the above equation, we get
Adding Equations (21) and (22), we have
which means that or g is an additive function such that
If and g is a non-zero function, then and using (17), we obtain , and then the Equation (16) has the form
Inserting in the above equation in place of y and using the oddness of the function g, we obtain
which means that g is an additive function such that
Putting in (11), we have
which means that or
Putting and , where
we obtain as a consequence (15).
The proof of the converse is a direct computation. □
Corollary 1.
Proof.
The function f is continuous and so, by Theorem 3, any solution of (11) is of the form with some . Whence, we derive the following conditions
which leads to our assertion. □
Remark 1.
We notice that for , such that at least one of them is not zero, we have:
- if and and , then or ;
- if and , then or or ,
which means that or in (23).
3.2. General Solution of (3) for
For , Equation (3) can be written in the following form
where for
Now, we give examples of functions that satisfy the Equation (24) with certain coefficients for
Example 2.
(a) Function satisfies the equation
- (b)
- Function satisfies the equation
- (c)
- Function satisfies the equation
- (d)
- Function satisfies the equation
- (e)
- Function satisfies the equation
- (f)
- Function satisfies the equation
Theorem 4.
If a function satisfies (24), then there exist the functions , and a constant , such that
for all and are biadditive, is biquadratic, is additive with respect to the first variable and quadratic with respect to the second variable, is quadratic with respect to the first variable and additive with respect to the second variable, are quadratic, is odd when and additive in others, is odd when and additive in others, and such that
for all and, moreover,
Conversely, for every function , where and are biadditive, is biquadratic, is additive with respect to the first variable and quadratic with respect to the second variable, is quadratic with respect to the first variable and additive with respect to the second variable, are quadratic, is odd when and additive in others, is odd when and additive in others, and such that conditions , , hold for all and for every constant , such that
the function of the form (25) is a solution to (24).
Proof.
Assume f satisfies (24) and define the function for Then, the function g for all satisfies the equation
and
Putting in (26) and then , we have
and
respectively. Putting in (26) , we obtain
Putting in (29) , then and , and finally , we get
and
respectively.
Putting (30) (with ) and (31) (with ) into (29), we have
hence using (32), we obtain
Replacing and in the Equation (34), we have
We denote
Adding Equations (34) and (35), we obtain
Putting in the above equation, we have
Putting in (26) , we get
Putting in (38) , then and , and finally , we get (30) and
and
respectively.
Putting (30) (with ) and (39) (with ) into (38), we have
hence, using (40), we obtain
Replacing and in the Equation (41), we have
Adding Equations (41) and (42), we obtain
Putting in the above equation, we have
Now, we consider two cases:
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- .
We start with case (i), so we assume that . Dividing the Equation (36) by A and subtracting from both its sides, we obtain
Subtracting Equation (37) and dividing by A from the above equation, we obtain
We fix and denote Then, we can write the above equation in the form
We decompose the function into even and odd parts, namely
By inserting in (45) in place of and in place of , we obtain
Adding Equations (45) and (46), we obtain
Putting in the above equation , we have
therefore
which means that is a quadratic mapping.
Subtracting Equation (46) from Equation (45) we obtain
Putting in the above equation , we have
therefore
which means that is an additive mapping.
Dividing the Equation (37) by A, we obtain the equation
which means that function satisfies functional Equation (45), and hence
where is an additive mapping and is a quadratic mapping.
Dividing the Equation (43) by A and subtracting from both its sides, we obtain
Subtracting Equation (44) divided by A from the above equation, we obtain
We denote for fixed and all Then, we can write the above equation in the form
which means that the function satisfies functional Equation (45), and hence
where is an additive mapping and is a quadratic mapping.
Dividing the Equation (37) by A, we obtain
which means that function satisfies functional Equation (45), and hence
where is an additive mapping and is a quadratic mapping.
Putting in (26) and , we obtain
It follows from our considerations that
where
for all and are biadditive, is biquadratic, is additive with respect to the first variable and quadratic with respect to the second variable, is quadratic with respect to the first variable and additive with respect to the second variable, are additive, are quadratic, and such that the conditions and with with (they result from Conditions (30), (39), (31) and (48)), and (they result from Conditions (27), (28), (32) and (40)) hold.
From the conditions with , and with , we determine that at most one of the functions is non-zero, so the function f has the form (25), where
Now, we consider case (ii), when From (40) and (32), we obtain
and
respectively. Putting in (49) and then , we have
and
which means that
Whence and from (49), using the function , we obtain
When is non-zero, using (27), we get
From (26) with , we obtain
Using our assumption from the above equation, we have
Inserting in place of and 0 in place of in (52), we obtain
From (52) and (53), we get
Inserting in the above equation in place of and using the oddness of the function , we have
Using (51) and (54), we obtain that
- if , then and is an odd;
- if , then the function is additive, such that
In an analogous manner to (50), using the function , we obtain
Moreover, when is non-zero, we have
- if , then and is an odd;
- if , then the function is additive, such that
Therefore, in the case when , (then ) the functions are such that
and
From (30), we obtain
hence, and from (49) and (50), we obtain
Therefore, in the case when and , the function
and the functions and satisfy Conditions (55)–(58).
We have to consider the case when or
- (a)
- ;
- (b)
- ;
- (c)
- ;
- (d)
- .
We start with case (a), so we assume that . Then, dividing Equation (61) by , we obtain
Putting and , and then and in (63), we have
respectively, and hence
which means that for fixed the function is odd and . Using these properties to (63), we have
and hence
which means that for fixed , the function is additive. From the fact that function is additive in this case, we determine that for each fixed the function is additive.
In case (b), we assume that . Then, dividing the Equation (62) by , we obtain
and in an analogous way, like in case (a), we determine that, for each fixed , the function is additive.
In case (c), we assume that . From (31), we obtain
which means that if and , the function f has the form (60) and the functions and satisfy Conditions (55), (56), and (58), and is odd.
In case (d), we assume that . From (39), we obtain
which means that if and , the function f has the form (60) and the functions and satisfy Conditions (55)–(57) and is odd.
We notice that in the case when and for all
As a consequence, when and
the function f has the form (25), where for all and is an odd when and additive in others; is an odd when and additive in others, such that the conditions and hold.
In the case when and Condition (66) does not hold, we consider four possibilities:
- (1)
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
In case (1), from (a) and (b), we determine that
where is a biadditive function such that
and the functions are additive and satisfy Conditions (55) and (56).
In case (2), from (a) and (d), we determine that for each fixed , the function is additive and ,
Putting in (26) and using our assumptions, we obtain
The Conditions (31) and (48), with our assumptions, have the form
and
respectively.
Putting (69) (with ) and (70) (with ) into (68), we have
hence, using (27), we obtain
Replacing and in the Equation (71), we obtain
Adding Equations (71) and (72), we have
Dividing the Equation (73) by and subtracting from both sides, we obtain
Then, we can write the above equation, using function where and is fixed, in the form
which means that the function satisfies functional Equation (47), and hence can be decomposed into even and odd parts, namely
where is a quadratic mapping and is an additive mapping.
Finally, in case (2), we obtain
where is biadditive, and is additive with respect to the first variable and quadratic with respect to the second variable function, such that
and the functions and satisfy Conditions (55)–(57) and is odd. From the above conditions, we determine that at most one of the functions is non-zero.
In case (3), from (b) and (c), we determine that for each fixed , the function is additive and ,
Starting from the equation
obtained from the Equation (26) with , and proceeding analogously as in (2), we obtain
for , where is biadditive, is quadratic with respect to the first variable and additive with respect to the second variable function, such that
and the functions and satisfy Conditions (55), (56), and (58), and is odd.
From the above conditions, we determine that at most one of the functions is non-zero.
In case (4), from (c) and (d), we have , , and
Putting in (26) and and using our assumptions, we obtain
Putting in (26) and then and using our assumptions, we get
and
respectively. From (74)–(76), using (59), (65), (64), (49) and (50), we have
respectively. Adding Equations (77) and (78), and then Equations (77) and (79), using our assumptions, we have
From (26), using (49), (50), (59), (64) and (65), we obtain
Putting and in (77), we have
From (81) and (82), we obtain
Inserting in the above equation in place of and in place of and using (80), we get
therefore, in this case, is biadditive, and f has Form (67), where is a biadditive function and are odd functions, such that
As a consequence, when and Condition (66) is not satisfied, in each of the four possible cases, we determine that the function f has Form (25), where and is biadditive, is additive with respect to the first variable and quadratic with respect to the second variable, is quadratic with respect to the the first variable and additive with respect to the second variable, and at most one of the functions is non-zero, is an odd when and additive in others, is an odd when and additive in others, and such that the conditions and with with and hold.
The proof of the converse is a direct computation. □
Remark 2.
Let us notice the following:
- From the conditions , we determine that at most one of the functions is non-zero;
- The conditions do not imply that at most one of the functions is a non-zero (see Example 2(d));
- The conditions do not imply that at most one of the functions is a non-zero.
Corollary 2.
Let be a continuous solution of (24). Then, there exist the odd continuous functions and where such that
and moreover,
Proof.
The function f is continuous and so, by Theorem 3, any solution of (24) is of the form
where and such that is an odd continuous function when and in others, is an odd continuous function when and in others. From and , we derive the following conditions
which means that at most one of the numbers is non-zero. Therefore,
with some and
From conditions and , we have
and
which leads to our assertion. □
Remark 3.
We notice that from Theorem 4 and Corollary 2, we obtain results for well-known functional equations, namely bi-Cauchy, bi-Jensen, Cauchy–Jensen, Jensen–Cauchy, and quadratic equations.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we have presented solutions to the problems posed in [6]. We have given a positive answer to the questions posed in Problems 1 and 2, showing that the Equation (3) is hyperstable in -normed spaces (Theorem 2). Our result also improves a result from [6,22]. We have also given a partial solution to Problem 3, describing a general solution of the Equation (3) for (Theorem 3) and (Theorem 4), which has a very complicated form.
The functional Equation (3) generalizes not only Equation (2) but also many other well-known functional equations, and for this reason, its study seems interesting.
We end the article with the following problem, which remains open.
Problem 4.
Find a general solution of Equation (3) for
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- Aczél, J. Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Aczél, J.; Dhombres, J. Functional Equations in Several Variables. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 31; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, P.; Qi, W.; Zhan, X. Generalized stability of multi-quadratic mappings. J. Math. Res. Appl. 2014, 34, 209–215. [Google Scholar]
- Ciepliński, K. Ulam stability of functional equations in 2-Banach spaces via the fixed point method. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2021, 23, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciepliński, K. On perturbations of two general equations in several variables. Math. Ann. 2023, 385, 921–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciepliński, K. Stability of a General Functional Equation in m-Banach Spaces. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2023, 46, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyers, D.H.; Isac, G.; Rassias, T.M. Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Bahyrycz, A. On stability and hyperstability of an equation characterizing multi-additive mappings. Fixed Point Theory 2017, 18, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahyrycz, A.; Ciepliński, K.; Olko, J. On an equation characterizing multi-Cauchy-Jensen mappings and its Hyers-Ulam stability. Acta Math. Sci. 2015, 35B, 1349–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahyrycz, A.; Sikorska, J. On Stability of a General n-Linear Functional Equation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brillouët-Belluot, N.; Brzdęk, J.; Ciepliński, K. On some recent developments in Ulam’s type stability. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 1, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brzdęk, J.; Chudziak, J.; Páles, Z. A fixed point approach to stability of functional equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74, 6728–6732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciepliński, K. Generalized stability of multi-additive mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1291–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciepliński, K. On Ulam stability of a functional equation. Results Math. 2020, 75, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Nonlinear Analysis; Springer Optimization and Its Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Prager, W.; Schwaiger, J. Stability of the multi-Jensen equation. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2008, 45, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.; Liu, J.; Lv, X. A Unified Approach to Solvability and Stability of Multipoint BVPs for Langevin and Sturm–Liouville Equations with CH–Fractional Derivatives and Impulses via Coincidence Theory. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K. Study on the stability and its simulation algorithm of a nonlinear impulsive ABC-fractional coupled system with a Laplacian operator via F-contractive mapping. Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod. 2024, 2024, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misiak, A. n-inner product spaces. Math. Nachr. 1989, 140, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahyrycz, A.; Brzdęk, J.; El-hady, E.-S.; Leśniak, Z. On Ulam Stability of Functional Equations in 2-Normed Spaces—A Survey. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunawan, H.; Mashadi, M. On n-normed spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2001, 27, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.; Najati, A.; Moghimi, M.B.; Noori, B. Approximation of two general functional equations in 2-Banach spaces. J. Math. Inequal. 2023, 17, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).