Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
SymmetrySymmetry
  • Article
  • Open Access

17 August 2022

On the Classification of Polyhedral Links

and
1
Department of Mathematics, Saitama University, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
2
Department of Mathematics, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Topological Methods in Chemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Knots and links are ubiquitous in chemical systems. Their structure can be responsible for a variety of physical and chemical properties, making them very important in materials development. In this article, we analyze the topological structures of interlocking molecules composed of metal-peptide rings using the concept of polyhedral links. To that end, we discuss the topological classification of alternating polyhedral links.

1. Introduction

A knot is a simple closed curve in a three-dimensional space. A disjoint union of knots is called a link or a catenane. See Figure 1 for examples. Knots and links can be found in many biological, chemical, and physical systems, including closed circular DNA [1,2,3,4,5], proteins [6,7,8], and topological vortices [9]. For references on knot theory and its applications, see [10,11,12,13,14,15], for example.
Figure 1. Example of a knot and a link. (Left) ( 2 , 7 ) -torus knot ( 7 1 knot). (Right) ( 2 , 8 ) -torus link ( 8 1 2 link). The crossing numbers of the ( 2 , 7 ) -torus and the ( 2 , 8 ) -torus link are 7 and 8, respectively. These are examples of alternating knots and links. These images are created by KnotPlot [16,17].
In [18,19], two topologically different metal-peptide interlocking molecules with entangled structures of 4 rings and 12 crossings were synthesized, and in [20], another interlocking molecule with 6 rings and 24 crossings was synthesized. See Section 3 for details. Recently metal-peptide ( 2 , p ) -torus knots and links with p = 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 are created in [21,22]. Figures of the ( 2 , 7 ) -torus knot ( 7 1 knot) and the ( 2 , 8 ) -torus link ( 8 1 2 link) can be found in Figure 1. See [23,24] for recent surveys on this subject.
The topological structures of molecules in [18,19,20] can be considered as polyhedral links [19,20]. The topological aspects of polyhedral links have been studied, for example, in [25,26,27]. This article discusses the property and the classification of alternating polyhedral links. By applying the results, we characterize the topology of interlocking structures.
The main results of this article are the classification of polyhedral links (Theorems 1–3). We show that the alternating link diagrams of polyhedral links of these types do not admit nontrivial flypes (see Definition 4). Hence, by the affirmative answer of the Tait flyping conjecture [28], the classification of the topology of these interlocking structures can be achieved by simply analyzing their alternating diagrams. Our results provide a solid tool for classifying the topological structures of interlocking molecules since the classification can be done directly by observing the diagram of the links without having to calculate the link invariants.
As applications of our results, we can give the design of two similar but different topological structures and propose a complex, intertwined, stable capsule structure with a huge cavity (see Section 6).
This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the definitions of polyhedral links and consider their topological properties. In Section 3, we discuss examples of interlocking molecules of metal-peptides rings. In Section 4, we give the classifications of polyhedral links. In Section 5, we give the proofs of the main results. In Section 6, we provide discussion and conclusions.

5. Proof of Theorems 1 and 3

In this section, we show that alternating link diagrams of polyhedral links do not admit nontrivial flypes. First, we start by explaining the classification of alternating links.

5.1. Alternating Diagrams and Flypes

In this section, we review the classification of alternating links by Menasco and Thistlethwaite [28]. First, we will introduce the flype operation.
Definition 4.
A flype is an operation of link diagrams as in Figure 5. The tangle diagram T that is a part of the link diagram is turned over by a rotation of 180 degrees around a horizontal axis. A flype is nontrivial if the obtained diagram is different from the original one.
Figure 5. A flype operation on a link diagram. A flype keeps the crossing number of the diagram.
If a flype is applied to an alternating diagram, the obtained diagram is also alternating.
A link diagram is reduced if it does not contain a nugatory crossing as in Figure 6A. A link diagram D is prime if each circle on S 2 meeting D in two points bounds a pair of a disk and a trivial arc. Otherwise, it is called a composite diagram. See Figure 6B.
Figure 6. (A) A nugatory crossing; (B) a composite diagram.
Since a standard alternating diagram is reduced by its construction, it attains the minimal crossing number of the polyhedral link [30,31,32].
On the classification of alternating links, Menasco and Thistlethwaite gave the affirmative answer of the Tait flyping conjecture in [28].
Theorem 4
([28]). Let D 1 and D 2 be reduced, prime, oriented, alternating diagrams of a link. Then, D 1 can be transformed to D 2 by a finite sequence of flypes and an isotopy of S 2 .
Note that the alternating diagrams obtained by the definitions of polyhedral links in this article are reduced and prime.

5.2. Rigidity of Alternating Link Diagrams of Polyhedral Links

We define rigid alternating diagrams.
Definition 5.
An alternating link diagram is called rigid if it does not admit nontrivial flypes.
The classification of links with reduced, prime, rigid alternating diagrams can be achieved by classifying diagrams. By Theorem 4, we have the following.
Proposition 4.
Let D 1 and D 2 be reduced, prime, rigid alternating link diagrams on S 2 . Then, D 1 and D 2 represent equivalent links if and only if D 1 can be transformed into D 2 by an isotopy of S 2 and taking the mirror image, if necessary.
We will show the following two propositions in the next subsection. These propositions show the stability of polyhedral link structures.
Proposition 5.
The standard alternating diagram of a type-A alternating polyhedral link is rigid.
Proposition 6.
The standard alternating diagram of a type-B alternating polyhedral link is rigid.

5.3. Dual Graphs of Polyhedral Link Diagrams

In [33], the search of nontrivial flypes was performed using dual graphs of link diagrams. We apply this method to standard alternating diagrams of polyhedral links. First, we start with the definition of dual graphs of link diagrams.
Definition 6
(See for example [33]). We consider a link projection as a 4-valent graph on S 2 , i.e., a graph with degree 4 at each vertex. The dual graph of that 4-valent graph is called the dual graph of a link diagram. The vertices of the dual graph correspond to the complementary regions of the link diagram. Two vertices of the dual graph are connected by an edge if the corresponding regions share a segment of the link diagram.
See Figure 7 for an example of a link diagram and its dual graph.
Figure 7. A type-A truncated cubic link diagram and its dual graph.
Next, we define nested 4-cycles of dual graphs.
Definition 7
([33]). Let v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , v 4 , and v 5 be distinct vertices in the dual graph of an alternating link diagram. Let v 1 v 2 v 3 v 4 , v 1 v 2 v 5 v 4 , and v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 be three 4-cycles in the dual graph. They are called nested 4-cycles if they satisfy the following conditions:
1. 
The disk Δ 1 bounded by an inner 4-cycle v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 contains exactly one crossing of the link diagram.
2. 
The disk Δ 2 bounded by another inner 4-cycle v 1 v 2 v 5 v 4 contains other vertices of the dual graph.
3. 
The outer 4-cycle v 1 v 2 v 3 v 4 bounds the disk Δ 1 Δ 2 .
See Figure 8 for an example of nested 4-cycles. The following argument is contained in Section 5 in [33].
Figure 8. Nested 4-cycles consist of the outer 4-cycle v 1 v 2 v 3 v 4 and two inner 4-cycles v 1 v 2 v 5 v 4 and v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 . The inner 4-cycle v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 bounds a disk containing one crossing of the link diagram, and the other inner 4-cycle v 1 v 2 v 5 v 4 bounds a disk containing at least one vertex of the dual graph.
Proposition 7
([33]). An alternating link diagram admits a nontrivial flype if and only if the dual graph contains nested 4-cycles.
Hence, if the dual graph does not contain nested 4-cycles, the alternating link diagram is rigid.
Proposition 8.
The dual graph of the diagram of a type-A polyhedral link of a polyhedron P is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges on the 1-skeleton of P.
See Figure 9 for the barycentric subdivision of a polyhedron.
Figure 9. Left: The barycentric subdivision of the tetrahedron P. The barycentric subdivision is obtained by P by adding the vertices corresponding to the centers of faces and the midpoints of edges of P and edges as in the figure. See, for example, ref. [34] for the detail. Center: The dual graph of the alternating diagram of a type-A tetrahedral link. It is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges on the 1-skeleton of P. Right: The dual graph of the alternating diagram of a type-B tetrahedral link. It is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges connecting vertices of P and the center of faces.
Proof. 
By the construction of a type-A polyhedral link, each of the vertices, the midpoints of edges, and the centers of faces of P corresponds to a vertex of the dual graph. An edge of the dual graph connects a vertex corresponding to the center of a face and a vertex corresponding to the midpoint of an edge. See Figure 9 (center). □
Proof of Proposition 5.
Let P be the polyhedron. By Proposition 8, the dual graph is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges on the 1-skeleton of P. Then, each 4-cycle of the dual graph satisfies one of the following:
  • It contains vertices corresponding to two centers of faces, one midpoint of an edge, and a vertex of P.
  • It contains vertices corresponding to two centers of faces and two vertices of P.
It is easy to see that there are no nested 4-cycles in the dual graph. □
Proposition 9.
The dual graph of the diagram of a type-B polyhedral link of a polyhedron P is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges connecting a vertex of P and a vertex corresponding to the center of a face of P.
Proof. 
By the construction of a type-B polyhedral link, each of the vertices, the midpoints of edges, and the center of faces of P corresponds to a vertex of the dual graph. An edge of the dual graph connects a vertex corresponding to the center of a face and a vertex corresponding to the midpoint of an edge, or a vertex corresponding to a vertex of P and a vertex corresponding to the midpoint of an edge. See Figure 9 (right). □
Proof of Proposition 6.
Let P be the polyhedron. By Proposition 9, the dual graph is obtained from the barycentric subdivision of P by deleting edges connecting a vertex of P and a vertex corresponding to the center of a face of P. Then, each 4-cycle of the dual graph contains vertices corresponding to the center of a face, two midpoints of edges, and a vertex of P. It is easy to see that there are no nested 4-cycles in the dual graph. □
Now, we will give the proofs of Theorems 1 and 3.
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let e denote the number of edges of P. Then, 2 e is equal to the sum of the degrees of vertices of P. By Proposition 1, a type-A polyhedral link of P and a type-B polyhedral link of P have the same crossing numbers.
By Propositions 5 and 6, the standard alternating diagram of each polyhedral link is rigid. The regions of a type-A polyhedral link diagram contain 2-gons on edges of P. On the other hand, no region of the standard diagram of a type-B polyhedral link is a 2-gon. Hence, these standard alternating diagrams are different. Therefore, by Proposition 4, those links are not equivalent. □
Proof of Theorem 3.
By Table 1 and Table 2, two links in each pair share the same number of components and crossings. We use the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 1. It is easy to check that the two standard diagrams of each pair are different. Hence, two links in each pair are inequivalent. □

6. Discussion and Conclusions

Nowadays, the topological property of chemical systems is discussed in many works. See, for example, refs. [35,36]. The topological structure of knots, links, and spatial graphs cause chirality and topological isomers [11,12] and changes the radius of gyration of cyclic polymers [37]. A spatial graph, a generalization of the concept of a knot or a link, is a realization of a graph in three-dimensional space. Multicyclic polymers have spatial graph structures [35].
In this paper, we studied the classification of polyhedral links using the affirmative answer of the Tait flyping conjecture. Our results (Theorems 1–3) provide a geometric topological proof for showing that the interlocking molecules of metal-peptide rings have different topologies. They also give a method for producing different links with the same number of crossings and components. In Propositions 5 and 6, we showed that these structures cannot be modified by flypes. The chemical interpretation of these results is that they demonstrate the stability of the capsule structure made by alternating polyhedral links. These structures are very intricately woven and therefore highly stable.
A polyhedral link is also considered to be a good structure for achieving capsule structures with a huge cavity. Structures of large cavities play essential roles in biological functions. The shell structure of the HK97 virus capsid [38] is an example of such structure. In [20], it is shown that the metal-peptide type-A cubic link provides an isolated cavity of 3200 Å 3 . Our results suggest that the same construction using a larger polyhedron will produce a larger structure with similar properties, such as stabilities. For example, larger polyhedral links in Table 1 and Table 2 would give larger cavities.
We hope the method of creating polyhedral links gives a hint for the future creation of topologically different interlocking structures that share some good properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S.; methodology, K.S.; validation, N.W. and K.S.; formal analysis, N.W. and K.S.; investigation, N.W. and K.S.; resources, K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.W. and K.S.; writing—review and editing, K.S.; visualization, N.W. and K.S.; supervision, K.S.; project administration, K.S.; funding acquisition, K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP16H03928 and JP21H00978.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The second author would like to express his gratitude to his students, Kaoru Yoshino, Naoshi Ino, Naoka Wakamatsu, Akihiro Tashiro, and Yuki Endo, for helpful discussions on this project. The picture of the truncated octahedron in Figure 2 was produced by Jun Mitani at Tsukuba University. We would like to express our thanks to the referees for their helpful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bates, A.D.; Maxwell, A. DNA Topology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsuaga, J.; Vazquez, M.; Trigueros, S.; Roca, J. Knotting probability of DNA molecules confined in restricted volumes: DNA knotting in phage capsids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5373–5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arsuaga, J.; Vazquez, M.; McGuirk, P.; Trigueros, S.; Roca, J. DNA knots reveal a chiral organization of DNA in phage capsids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9165–9169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shimokawa, K.; Ishihara, K.; Grainge, I.; Sherratt, D.J.; Vazquez, M. FtsK-dependent XerCD-dif recombination unlinks replication catenanes in a stepwise manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20906–20911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stolz, R.; Yoshida, M.; Brasher, R.; Flanner, M.; Ishihara, K.; Sherratt, D.J.; Shimokawa, K.; Vazquez, M. Pathways of DNA unlinking: A story of stepwise simplification. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sulkowska, J.I.; Rawdon, E.J.; Millett, K.C.; Onuchic, J.N.; Stasiak, A. Conservation of complex knotting and slipknotting patterns in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E1715–E1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jamroz, M.; Niemyska, W.; Rawdon, E.J.; Stasiak, A.; Millett, K.C.; Sulkowski, P.; Sulkowska, J.I. KnotProt: A database of proteins with knots and slipknots. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 43, D306–D314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dabrowski-Tumanski, P.; Rubach, P.; Goundaroulis, D.; Dorier, J.; Sulkowski, P.; Millett, K.C.; Rawdon, E.J.; Stasiak, A.; Sulkowska, J.I. KnotProt 2.0: A database of proteins with knots and other entangled structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 47, D367–D375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kleckner, D.; Irvine, W.T.M. Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murasugi, K. Knot Theory and Its Applications; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  11. Flapan, E. When Topology Meets Chemistry; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. Flapan, E. Knots, Molecules, and the Universe; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Adams, C.C. The Knot Book; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cromwell. Knots and Links; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawauchi, A. (Ed.) A Survey of Knot Theory; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  16. KnotPlot. Available online: https://www.knotplot.com (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  17. Scharein, R.G. Interactive Topological Drawing. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sawada, T.; Yamagami, M.; Ohara, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Fujita, M. Peptide [4]catenane by folding and assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4519–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sawada, T.; Saito, A.; Tamiya, K.; Shimokawa, K.; Hisada, Y.; Fujita, M. Metal-peptide rings form highly entangled topologically inequivalent frameworks with the same ring- and crossing-numbers. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sawada, T.; Inomata, Y.; Shimokawa, K.; Fujita, M. A metal-peptide capsule by multiple ring threading. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Inomata, Y.; Sawada, T.; Fujita, M. Metal-peptide torus knots from flexible short peptides. Chem 2020, 6, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Inomata, Y.; Sawada, T.; Fujita, M. Metal-peptide nonafoil knots and decafoil supercoils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 16734–16739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sawada, T.; Fujita, M. Folding and assembly of metal-linked peptidic nanostructures. Chem 2020, 6, 1861–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sawada, T.; Fujita, M. Orderly entangled nanostructures of metal-peptide strands. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2021, 94, 2342–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiu, W.-Y.; Zhai, X.-D.; Qiu, Y.-Y. Architecture of Platonic and Archimedean polyhedral links. Sci. Chin. Ser. B Chem. 2008, 51, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, G.; Zhai, X.-D.; Lu, D.; Qiu, W.-Y. The architecture of Platonic polyhedral links. J. Math. Chem. 2009, 46, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lu, D.; Hu, G.; Qiu, Y.-Y.; Qiu, W.-Y. Topological transformation of dual polyhedral links. Match Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2010, 63, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  28. Menasco, W.; Thithlethwaite, M. The classification of alternating links. Ann. Math. 1993, 138, 113–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cromwell, P.R. Polyhedra; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kauffman, L.H. State models and the Jones polynomial. Topology 1987, 26, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murasugi, K. Jones polynomials and classical conjectures in knot theory. Topology 1987, 26, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thistlethwaite, M.B. A spanning tree expansion of the Jones polynomial. Topology 1987, 26, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Howards, H.; Li, J.; Liu, X. An infinite family of knots whose hexagonal mosaic number is only realized in non-reduced projections. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1912.03697v1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hatcher, A. Algebraic Topology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shimokawa, K.; Ishihara, K.; Tezuka, Y. Topology of Polymers; Springer Briefs in the Mathematics of Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Orek, C.; Gündüz, B.; Kaygili, O.; Bulut, N. Electronic, optical, and spectroscopic analysis of TBADN organic semiconductor: Experiment and theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 678, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Uehara, E.; Deguchi, T. Knotting probability of self-avoiding polygons under a topological constraint. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 094901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wikoff, W.R.; Liljas, L.; Duda, R.L.; Tsuruta, H.; Hendrix, R.W.; Johnson, J.E. Topologically linked protein rings in the bacteriophage HK97 capsid. Science 2000, 289, 2129–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.