Next Article in Journal
Ecological Management Zoning Through Integration of Ecosystem Service and Landscape Ecological Risk: A Case Study in Chongli, China
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Tree Falls Caused by Weather Events in Urban Areas: The Case Study of the City of Venice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Risk Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution in Rural Land Trusteeship

Research Center of Digital Rural Service, School of Public Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(6), 1132; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061132
Submission received: 6 April 2025 / Revised: 7 May 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Land Systems and Global Change)

Abstract

Rural land trusteeship, as an innovative agricultural business model, has played an important role in enhancing agricultural production efficiency and optimizing land resource allocation. However, the model has also revealed many risks in the process of its implementation, posing challenges to its sustainable development. Based on the cases of land trusteeship risk disputes made public by the China Judges and Records Network from 2013 to 2023, this paper uses Nvivo 12 Plus qualitative analysis software to identify and characterize the risks and utilizes the spatial analysis method to explore the spatial and temporal evolution of the risks. The study found the following: (1) Risks of rural land trusteeship can be categorized as market, operational, financial, natural, and contractual risks, with financial and contractual risks being more prominent. (2) The number of land trusteeship disputes gradually increased from 2013 to 2020, reaching a peak in 2020. Subsequently, the number has shown a decreasing trend, which reflects the positive effect of policy. (3) In terms of spatial pattern, land trusteeship risks have a significant northeast–southwest clustering trend, North China and Northeast China being high-risk clustering areas, while South China and Southwest China have relatively low risks. (4) There are significant differences in the spatial distributions of different types of risks, with market and operational risks being highly concentrated in economically active areas, while natural risks are more influenced by the geographic environment.
Keywords: land trusteeship risks; risk types; risk analysis; spatial and temporal evolution land trusteeship risks; risk types; risk analysis; spatial and temporal evolution

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, J.; Fang, X. Risk Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution in Rural Land Trusteeship. Land 2025, 14, 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061132

AMA Style

Xiao J, Fang X. Risk Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution in Rural Land Trusteeship. Land. 2025; 14(6):1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Jianying, and Xinran Fang. 2025. "Risk Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution in Rural Land Trusteeship" Land 14, no. 6: 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061132

APA Style

Xiao, J., & Fang, X. (2025). Risk Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution in Rural Land Trusteeship. Land, 14(6), 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop