Next Article in Journal
Insect Outbreak and Long-Term Post-Fire Effects on Soil Erosion in Mediterranean Suburban Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Cropping Systems by Organic Fertilizer and Tillage Management
Previous Article in Journal
A Knowledge Map Study of an Application of a Smart Land Planning Free-Trade Zone and China’s Contribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance and Obstacle Tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement Project: A Case Study on the Theory of Public Value

1
Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(6), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022

Abstract

In Gansu Province, China, Wuwei City is an ecologically fragile migration area at the intersection of the Loess Plateau, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and the Mongolia-New Plateau. Using the Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS method and the obstacle factor diagnostic model, the implementation performance and follow-up support issues of the Ecological Resettlement Project were analyzed from the perspective of the eco-migrant and the public value theory. In contrast to traditional performance appraisal methods, Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS breaks through the ambiguity of complex environments and subjective information and effectively quantifies the fuzziness of evaluator language variables to improve the validity. The overall performance of the Ecological Resettlement Project in Wuwei is good; the average closeness degree of process is higher than outcome. Migrants rated the fairness of the project as the highest, followed by support, economic outcome, and satisfaction. Gulang County’s performance in the Ecological Resettlement Project is the best, followed by Tianzhu County and Liangzhou District. Project obstacles were mostly related to the outcome dimension, especially the ecological restoration and management, the return to poverty risk, and industrial development on the resettlement site. The main obstacle to the process dimension is migrant satisfaction with government subsidies. Research results provide case study support and experience inspiration for migrant relocation models and their long-term livelihood improvement in the context of rural revitalization.
Keywords: Ecological Resettlement Project; eco-migrants; performance evaluation; public value; Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS; Qilian Mountains Ecological Resettlement Project; eco-migrants; performance evaluation; public value; Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS; Qilian Mountains

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhou, L. Performance and Obstacle Tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement Project: A Case Study on the Theory of Public Value. Land 2022, 11, 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhou L. Performance and Obstacle Tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement Project: A Case Study on the Theory of Public Value. Land. 2022; 11(6):910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ya, and Lihua Zhou. 2022. "Performance and Obstacle Tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement Project: A Case Study on the Theory of Public Value" Land 11, no. 6: 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910

APA Style

Wang, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022). Performance and Obstacle Tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement Project: A Case Study on the Theory of Public Value. Land, 11(6), 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop