Next Article in Journal
The Pluralistic Water Research Concept: A New Human-Water System Research Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling Stream Bank Erosion: Practical Stream Results and Future Needs
Previous Article in Journal
Delineating the Drainage Structure and Sources of Groundwater Flux for Lake Basaka, Central Rift Valley Region of Ethiopia
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Theoretical Model to Predict the Critical Hydraulic Gradient for Soil Particle Movement under Two-Dimensional Seepage Flow
Open AccessArticle

Quantifying Effectiveness of Streambank Stabilization Practices on Cedar River, Nebraska

1
Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68535, USA
2
Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68535, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(12), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120930
Received: 15 September 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 26 November 2017 / Published: 29 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Streambank Erosion: Monitoring, Modeling and Management)
Excessive sediment is a major pollutant to surface waters worldwide. In some watersheds, streambanks are a significant source of this sediment, leading to the expenditure of billions of dollars in stabilization projects. Although costly streambank stabilization projects have been implemented worldwide, long-term monitoring to quantify their success is lacking. There is a critical need to document the long-term success of streambank restoration projects. The objectives of this research were to (1) quantify streambank retreat before and after the stabilization of 18 streambanks on the Cedar River in North Central Nebraska, USA; (2) assess the impact of a large flood event; and (3) determine the most cost-efficient stabilization practice. The stabilized streambanks included jetties (10), rock-toe protection (1), slope reduction/gravel bank (1), a retaining wall (1), rock vanes (2), and tree revetments (3). Streambank retreat and accumulation were quantified using aerial images from 1993 to 2016. Though streambank retreat has been significant throughout the study period, a breached dam in 2010 caused major flooding and streambank erosion on the Cedar River. This large-scale flood enabled us to quantify the effect of one extreme event and evaluate the effectiveness of the stabilized streambanks. With a 70% success rate, jetties were the most cost-efficient practice and yielded the most deposition. If minimal risk is unacceptable, a more costly yet immobile practice such as a gravel bank or retaining wall is recommended. View Full-Text
Keywords: cost-efficiency; monitoring; streambank retreat; streambank stabilization; water quality cost-efficiency; monitoring; streambank retreat; streambank stabilization; water quality
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dave, N.; Mittelstet, A.R. Quantifying Effectiveness of Streambank Stabilization Practices on Cedar River, Nebraska. Water 2017, 9, 930.

AMA Style

Dave N, Mittelstet AR. Quantifying Effectiveness of Streambank Stabilization Practices on Cedar River, Nebraska. Water. 2017; 9(12):930.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dave, Naisargi; Mittelstet, Aaron R. 2017. "Quantifying Effectiveness of Streambank Stabilization Practices on Cedar River, Nebraska" Water 9, no. 12: 930.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop