Next Article in Journal
Trends in the Airglow Temperatures in the MLT Region—Part 2: SABER Observations and Comparisons to Model Simulations
Previous Article in Journal
Flash Drought Response to Precipitation and Atmospheric Evaporative Demand in Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of an Understanding of Reactive Mercury in Ambient Air: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring, Analysis, and Chemistry: New Insights and Progress toward Minamata Convention Goals

by
James V. Cizdziel
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
Atmosphere 2021, 12(2), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020166
Submission received: 11 January 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2021 / Accepted: 26 January 2021 / Published: 28 January 2021
Mercury is a persistent and toxic global contaminant that is transported through the atmosphere, deposits to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and concentrates up the food chain reaching levels that can harm both humans and wildlife [1]. In this Special Issue on atmospheric mercury (Hg), seven original research articles and a review paper report the latest findings describing the distribution, deposition, and measurement of this airborne pollutant as well as the human and environmental impacts of artisanal mining of Hg and gold. The papers span a wide range of investigations including the determination of Hg deposition in northwest USA [2], southeast Europe [3], and Chongming Island, near Shanghai, China [4]; the development and use of iodinated activated carbon for traceable determination of airborne Hg [5]; new measurements of atmospheric Hg along the northern Gulf of Mexico using passive air sampling [6]; the impacts of artisanal gold mining and associated Hg trade in south and central America [7,8]; and a timely review on reactive Hg in ambient air [9]. This editorial provides highlights of these interesting papers and presents them in the broader context of modern atmospheric Hg research and the Minamata Convention on Mercury, a global treaty now signed by 127 parties and designed to protect human health and the environment from anthropogenic emissions of Hg.
Advances in measuring atmospheric Hg have improved our understanding of its sources, transport, transformations, fluxes, and fate. Airborne Hg is generally categorized as gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and reactive mercury (RM), with the latter representing gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) and particle-bound mercury (PBM). Accurately measuring RM as a whole is challenging, let alone individual Hg compounds. Gustin et al. [9] provide a review focusing on the fascinating history of efforts to quantify and characterize RM, along with the current state of such measurements and knowledge. Methods for measuring RM are changing as concerns over artifacts or repeatability emerge or as knowledge of RM improves. Early work using mist chambers [10], filters and membranes [11], and denuders [12] naturally resulted in inter-comparison studies, especially after an automated system became commercially available from Tekran® Instruments Corporation that improved temporal resolution. The Tekran speciation system was an important step forward because as Hg sources and oxidant chemistry of the air vary, so too do levels of RM. The Tekran, as it is known, became standard, and the system was employed by researchers worldwide. More recently, it was demonstrated that the KCl denuder used in the Tekran is not adequate for measuring RM concentration [9], and so the development of new methods continues. Among them are the Reactive Mercury Active System (RMAS) and the ever-promising mass spectrometry. Moving forward, the review authors strongly advocate for the field calibration of oxidized Hg measurements. The review concludes with useful sections on “what we have learned” and “work needed.”
Continuing on the important theme of attaining accurate and reliable measurements, Zivkovic and colleagues [5] investigated spiking of a standard reference material (NIST 3133) directly onto iodinated activated carbon (AC) traps for accurate and traceable calibration determination of ambient Hg0. Measurements were made by atomic absorption spectrometry after sample combustion. There were identical responses between Hg loaded directly and Hg loaded by purging from the NIST solution after reduction with SnCl2 across a wide concentration range (10–2000 ng). Further proof-of-concept studies on real atmospheric samples, where accuracy was assessed by a different reference material, showed that the approach is, indeed, effective for measuring atmospheric Hg. The authors include details for preparation and optimization of the quantitative analysis setup. They also deconvoluted peaks of fractionation thermograms to identify iodide of Millon’s base (HgO·Hg(NH3)2I2) as the likely final Hg complexing agent.
In another study employing AC for GEM measurements, Jeon et al. [6] deployed MerPAS® passive air samplers (PASs) containing sulfur impregnated AC along the northern Gulf of Mexico. The region has high Hg wet deposition rates and high levels of Hg in seafood compared to other coastlines in the USA. Unlike the Tekran speciation system discussed earlier, these PASs are relatively inexpensive and require no external power. Thus, they are typically deployed to increase area coverage and improve spatial resolution, albeit with poorer temporal resolution since they often need to be placed outdoors for several weeks to capture enough Hg for measurement. The PASs discriminate landscape and seasonal effects if given sufficient collection time, adequate analytical precision, and low blank levels [13]. Along the Gulf Coast, it was found that concentrations varied depending on proximity to sources and site characteristics, with a coastal marsh having the lowest GEM levels possibly due to uptake by vegetation. The PASs gave slightly lower concentrations compared to an active sampling system at Grand Bay, but generally showed similar seasonal patterns. Overall, the work demonstrates that PASs can provide insight into GEM levels and the factors affecting them along coastal regions.
As noted, three of the papers focused on Hg deposition. In Washington, USA, Beutel and colleagues [2] quantified both wet and dry Hg deposition at rural and suburban sites using a direct measurement approach with simple, low-cost equipment. The authors used an aerodynamic “wet sampler” for assessing dry deposition. GOM, PBM, and some GEM were collected in a thin layer of a recirculating acidic aqueous solution placed on a Teflon plate. The setup was operated for several days before the solution was collected, preserved, and analyzed for total-Hg. Wet deposition sampling was more standard. The rate was calculated as mass accumulation divided by the area of the collecting funnel and duration of the sampling event. The authors concluded that direct measurement approaches are useful in assessing temporal and spatial patterns of Hg deposition, and for comparing results to other approaches and estimates from numerical air quality models. They also show that agricultural burning in rural areas can lead to elevated levels of dry deposition and that short-term rain events account for ~20% of Hg deposition during the dry season.
Meanwhile, Tang et al. [4] examined Hg wet deposition on Chongming Island, China, from 2014–2018 to understand Hg wet deposition characteristics over multiple years. Notably, this is a period that saw the implementation of the Minamata Convention and anthropogenic Hg emission controls that allowed evaluation of the effectiveness of those controls. Volume-weighted mean Hg concentrations decreased during the study period, which was explained by decreasing atmospheric Hg levels and anthropogenic emission reductions. The authors also examined the impact of meteorological variations and showed that large-scale meteorological circulation events (e.g., monsoons) significantly impact Hg wet deposition. Thus, they recommend using long-term Hg wet deposition flux values in future Hg assessment programs to evaluate the impact of anthropogenic emissions reductions and inter-annual meteorological conditions.
Biomonitoring is yet another approach to measure Hg deposition, but one that requires no sampling equipment, other than that needed to retrieve the biota. Here, Stafilov et al. [3] used two species of moss blanketing North Macedonia to examine spatial and temporal patterns of Hg deposition within the eastern European region. The authors determined Hg in the samples collected as far back as 2002. Analysis of the median values showed an increase from 2002 to 2010 and a slight reduction from 2010 to 2015. Mercury distribution maps showed that sites with increased concentrations of Hg in moss were likely impacted by anthropogenic pollution; sites include thermoelectric power plants and a former chlor-alkali plant. It was concluded that Hg air pollution in the region is highest in industrialized areas. The authors rightfully note that such work is important for modeling Hg pollution and monitoring future trends in deposition, in order to assess and preserve ecosystem health. This is also a nice segue to the last two papers to be highlighted.
A good way to conclude this editorial are the contributions from Brown et al. [7] and Marshall et al. [8] on the environmental and health impacts of mining, bringing us back to the Minamata Convention on Mercury. It is undeniable that artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) employing Hg has major impacts on Hg pollution. Gold amalgamation with Hg0, which incidentally is used in many of our instruments to concentrate and isolate Hg prior to spectroscopic analysis, is still commonly used in the developing world to separate gold from unwanted minerals, despite the means to do so without Hg [14]. I applaud the work of Brown and colleagues involving a training program to monitor elemental Hg emissions originating from gold shops in Guyana, South America. The effort included both locals and undergraduate student researchers from the USA, offering a meaningful educational experience for both. Several gold shops had measurements exceeding 100,000 ng/m3, the guideline for occupational exposure limits in the USA. The authors note that while their work identified this significant source of Hg0 emissions, it did not provide insight into the fate of this Hg. They also suggest that future mapping incorporating data from passive air samplers, like those discussed earlier, may add to our understanding of the fate of Hg0 emitted from gold shops. Finally, they astutely point out that ASGM continues to be a global challenge faced by not only Guyana and other nations engaged in ASGM activities, but also all signatory nations of the Minamata Convention.
Last, but not least, Marshall et al. [8] reported on Hg challenges faced by Mexico involving regulatory, trade, and environmental impacts. While official Hg exports have declined, primary artisanal Hg mining in Mexico continues to proliferate, as does its associated problems. The authors include a brief history of Hg mining in Mexico, a description of the key stages of the mining process, and an analysis of Hg supply and trade in several countries of South America that have large ASGM sectors, leading to the examination of the regulatory control suggested by the Minamata Convention directives. They also provide atmospheric Hg concentrations measured at mine sites. The authors conclude that as the gold price remains high and artisanal gold mining using Hg amalgamation proliferates around the world, the demand for Hg from countries like Mexico and Indonesia will continue unabated, even with implementation of international agreements like the Minamata Convention. Finally, they discuss the economic alternatives that could be promoted in the region to substitute the destructive practices associated with primary Hg mining. I personally appreciate the final section on recommendations and future steps, which is a must read for stakeholders.
In summary, this group of articles provide a valuable update on atmospheric Hg research, showing not just how far we have come as a research community, but how far we must still go. The research stems from around the world, exemplifying that Hg is a global pollutant that affects us all. I thank the authors for their valuable contributions and hope this issue sparks some thought, collaboration, or simply serves as a resource to move us forward in a rapidly changing world and climate.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Driscoll, C.T.; Mason, R.P.; Chan, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Pirrone, N. Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4967–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Beutel, M.W.; DeSilva, L.; Amegbletor, L. Direct Measurement of Mercury Deposition at Rural and Suburban Sites in Washington State, USA. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stafilov, T.; Barandovski, L.; Šajn, R.; Bačeva Andonovska, K. Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Macedonia from 2002 to 2015 Determined Using the Moss Biomonitoring Technique. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Gao, W.; Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, K.; Han, D. Impacts of Anthropogenic Emissions and Meteorological Variation on Hg Wet Deposition in Chongming, China. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Živković, I.; Berisha, S.; Kotnik, J.; Jagodic, M.; Horvat, M. Traceable Determination of Atmospheric Mercury Using Iodinated Activated Carbon Traps. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeon, B.; Cizdziel, J.V.; Brewer, J.S.; Luke, W.T.; Cohen, M.D.; Ren, X.; Kelley, P. Gaseous Elemental Mercury Concentrations along the Northern Gulf of Mexico Using Passive Air Sampling, with a Comparison to Active Sampling. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brown, S.T.; Bandoo, L.L.; Agard, S.S.; Thom, S.T.; Gilhuys, T.E.; Mudireddy, G.K.; Eechampati, A.V.; Hasan, K.M.; Loving, D.C.; Seney, C.S.; et al. A Collaborative Training Program to Assess Mercury Pollution from Gold Shops in Guyana’s Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Sector. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marshall, B.G.; Camacho, A.A.; Jimenez, G.; Veiga, M.M. Mercury Challenges in Mexico: Regulatory, Trade and Environmental Impacts. Atmosphere 2020, 12, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gustin, M.S.; Dunham-Cheatham, S.M.; Huang, J.; Lindberg, S.; Lyman, S.N. Development of an Understanding of Reactive Mercury in Ambient Air: A Review. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stratton, W.J.; Lindberg, S.E. Use of a refluxing mist chamber for measurement of gas-phase mercury(ii) species in the atmosphere. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ebinghaus, R.; Jennings, S.G.; Schroeder, W.H.; Berg, T.; Donaghy, T.; Guentzel, J.; Kenny, C.; Kock, H.H.; Kvietkus, K.; Landing, W.; et al. International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3063–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Feng, X.B.; Sommar, J.; Gardfeldt, K.; Lindqvist, O. Improved determination of gaseous divalent mercury in ambient air using KCl coated denuders. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jeon, B.; Cizdziel, J.V. Can the MerPAS Passive Air Sampler Discriminate Landscape, Seasonal, and Elevation Effects on Atmospheric Mercury? A Feasibility Study in Mississippi, USA. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Drace, K.; Kiefer, A.M.; Veiga, M.M.; Williams, M.K.; Ascari, B.; Knapper, K.A.; Logan, K.M.; Breslin, V.M.; Skidmore, A.; Bolt, D.A.; et al. Mercury-free, small-scale artisanal gold mining in Mozambique: Utilization of magnets to isolate gold at clean tech mine. Atmosphere 2012, 32, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cizdziel, J.V. Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring, Analysis, and Chemistry: New Insights and Progress toward Minamata Convention Goals. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020166

AMA Style

Cizdziel JV. Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring, Analysis, and Chemistry: New Insights and Progress toward Minamata Convention Goals. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(2):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cizdziel, James V. 2021. "Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring, Analysis, and Chemistry: New Insights and Progress toward Minamata Convention Goals" Atmosphere 12, no. 2: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop