Next Article in Journal
Clinical Utility of Opportunistic Genome-Wide cfDNA Prenatal Screening in Intermediate-Risk Pregnancies
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Transcriptomics and Machine Learning to Uncover the FLI1-PARP14-Immune Axis in Ulcerative Colitis Activity and Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Codon Usage Bias of 30 Chloroplast Genomes in Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Model to Crop: Roles of Macroautophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes

1
Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2
Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pests Management on Crops in Southern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhengzhou 450002, China
3
Henan Key Laboratory of Agricultural Pest Monitoring and Control, Zhengzhou 450002, China
4
Biopesticide Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2025, 16(11), 1343; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111343
Submission received: 27 October 2025 / Revised: 5 November 2025 / Accepted: 6 November 2025 / Published: 7 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers: 'Plant Genetics and Genomics' Section)

Abstract

Leguminous plants are critical global crops for food security, animal feed, and ecological sustainability due to their ability to establish nitrogen-fixing symbioses with rhizobia and their high nutritional value. Autophagy, a highly conserved eukaryotic catabolic process, mediates the degradation and recycling of cytoplasmic components through the fusion of autophagosome with vacuole/lysosome and plays essential roles in plant growth, stress adaptation, and cellular homeostasis. This review systematically summarizes current knowledge of autophagy in both Arabidopsis and leguminous plants. We first outline the conserved molecular machinery of autophagy, focusing on core autophagy-related (ATG) genes in Arabidopsis and key legume species such as Glycine max, Arachis hypogaea, Pisum sativum, Cicer arietinum, and Medicago truncatula. Furthermore, the review dissects the intricate molecular regulatory networks controlling autophagy, with an emphasis on the roles of phytohormones, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications. We then highlight the multifaceted physiological functions of autophagy in these plants. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of the ATG8 gene family in peanut indicates that its members may be involved in seed development, biological nitrogen fixation, and drought resistance. Finally, it highlights key unresolved challenges in legume autophagy research and proposes future research directions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding the unique regulatory mechanisms of autophagy in legumes and to provide insights for molecular breeding aimed at developing stress-resilient, high-yielding, and high-quality legume cultivars.

1. Introduction

Leguminous plants (Fabaceae), the third-largest among flowing plants, are considered important crops as they provide proteins and oils for humans and farm animals around the world, contributing 27% of the world’s primary food production [1,2]. Peanut (A. hypogaea), soybean (G. max), chickpea (C. arietinum), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), and pea (P. sativum) occupy a pivotal position in global agriculture and ecological sustainability. Leguminous plants contain 2–3 times more protein than cereals like wheat, barley, corn, sorghum, and rice, with low fat content and no cholesterol, making them essential for cardiovascular health, gut health, malnutrition, and blood sugar management [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Beyond their nutritional value, legumes play a critical role in diversifying cropping system, reducing reliance on monocultures, and enhancing soil fertility through their unique symbiotic association with rhizobia-soil bacteria capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, a form accessible to plants [9]. This biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) not only reduces the need for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, lowering agricultural costs and greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer production, but also enriches soil nitrogen levels for subsequent crops, making legumes integral to sustainable crop rotation systems [10]. Despite their significance, legume production faces challenges including abiotic stresses [11,12,13], biotic stresses [14,15,16], and yield gaps in resource-limited regions [17,18]. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying their stress tolerance, symbiotic efficiency, and nutritional quality is thus crucial for leveraging legumes’ full potential in addressing global food security, mitigating environmental degradation, and promoting agricultural sustainability.
Autophagy is a fundamental cellular processes, literally “self-eating”, through which cells target the damaged organelles or proteins to the vacuole/lysosome for degradation and potential reuse of the resulting molecules. In eukaryotes, autophagic routes have been classified into three major types: chaperone-mediated autophagy [19], microautophagy [20], and macroautophagy [21]. In plant, macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is a process by which large cytoplasmic cargo such as protein or pigment aggregates, molecular complex, and damaged organelles is delivered to the vacuole. This mechanism enables plant survival during challenges such as nutrient deprivation, abiotic stress, and pathogen infection [22,23]. Conserved autophagosome biogenesis process includes over 20 autophagy-related (ATG) genes in Arabidopsis. Based on their interactions, the encoded ATG proteins can be divided into 5 core subgroups: (1) the ATG1/ATG13 protein kinase complex, critical for autophagy initiation, nutritional signal sensing, the recruitment of downstream ATG proteins, and the formation of autophagosome [24]; (2) ATG9 vesicles and the ATG2-ATG18 complex, required for phagophore expansion [25]; (3) the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex, vital for autophagy and endosomal maturation [26]; (4) the ATG12-ATG5 conjugation system, indispensable for the incorporation of ATG8-PE into the expanding phagophore [27]; (5) the ATG8 conjugation system, essential for orchestrating membrane formation and selective autophagy [28].
In Arabidopsis, ATG6 is essential for restricting the pathogen-induced cell death response [29]. ATG5 plays essential role in leaves for nitrogen supply and in seeds for the establishment of carbon and nitrogen reserves [30]. All canonical atg mutants exhibit phenotypes characterized by accelerated leaf senescence and hypersensitivity to carbon and nitrogen limitation [31]. In rice (Oryza sativa), Osatg7-1, an autophagy-disrupted rice mutant, showed reduced biomass production and nitrogen use efficiency compared with the wild type [32]. In addition, the seeds of Osatg7-1 are smaller and show chalky appearance and lower starch content in the endosperm at the mature stage under normal growth condition [33]. Overexpression of the rice gene OsATG8b enhances tolerance to nitrogen starvation, while simultaneously improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency in Arabidopsis [34]. The OsATG9 genes counteract autophagy to balance growth and drought tolerance in rice [35]. In maize (Zea mays), ZmATG3-overexpressing Arabidopsis exhibit higher osmotic/salinity tolerance and upregulated expression of other AtATGs under stress, indicating ZmATG3 overexpression improves tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses [36]. ZmATG8c enhances maize thermotolerance during both vegetative and reproductive growth stages by increasing autophagosome production, elevating ATG8 levels, and reducing the accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates, thereby improving seedling survival and grain yield under heat stress [37]. ZmATG18a exerts a positive regulatory role in maize responses to drought stress: specifically, a gain-of-stop EMS mutant of ZmATG18a displayed heightened sensitivity to drought, whereas a Mutator transposon-induced mutant with upregulated ZmATG18a expression exhibited enhanced drought tolerance [38].
Although ATG genes have been identified and characterized in Arabidopsis and Poaceae plants, research on autophagy in Fabaceae plants remains relatively limited and requires systematic integration. The uniqueness and scientific value of autophagy research in legumes stem from their distinctive biological traits, particularly the evolutionarily conserved yet specialized symbiotic nitrogen-fixing relationship with rhizobia, which sets them apart from other plant families. For instance, autophagy in legumes mediates not only canonical functions like cellular homeostasis under abiotic stresses but also orchestrates nodule development, senescence, and the dynamic allocation of fixed nitrogen [39,40,41]. This specialized context highlights legume-specific autophagy mechanisms, including the regulation of ATG gene expression during nodule maturation and the selective degradation of symbiosis-associated proteins, which collectively fine-tune rhizobial colonization.

2. Molecular Mechanisms of Autophagy in Arabidopsis and Leguminous Plants

In response to rapidly fluctuating environments, eukaryotes have evolved diverse mechanisms to preserve cellular homeostasis, facilitate nutrient recycling, and conduct quality control of cellular components under both basal and stressful conditions. Autophagy represents a highly conserved catabolic process that plays vital roles in plant growth, development, and stress adaptation [42]. Notably, phytohormones also serve as central regulators of many of these physiological and stress-responsive processes [43]. Accumulating experimental evidence underscores an intimate crosstalk between autophagy and phytohormone signaling cascades, and the underpinning molecular mechanisms governing these interactive pathways have started to be unraveled. In additon, the nuclear events involved in the regulation of plant autophagy have been emerged [44]. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of how hormones, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifiers regulate the activity of autophagy in Arabidopsis and legumes.

2.1. Phytohormones and Autophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes

In Arabidopsis, in the presence of brassinosteroids (BRs), enhanced BR signaling abrogates the phosphorylation of regulatory-associated protein of TOR 1B (RAPTOR1B) and brassinosteroid insensitive 1-EMS-suppressor 1 (BES1) by the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)-like kinase brassinosteroid-insensitive 2 (BIN2). This inhibition of BIN2-mediated phosphorylation promotes target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase activity, which in turn downregulates autophagic flux. Conversely, under BR-deficient conditions, BIN2 retains its kinase activity to phosphorylate both RAPTOR1B and BES1. The consequent attenuation of BR signaling ultimately results in the induction of autophagy [45]. During leaf senescence and pathogen ingress, salicylic acid (SA) signaling is amplified through the activation of SA biosynthetic pathways, thereby establishing an amplification loop dependent on ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 (EDS1). In parallel, this SA-driven signaling pathway elicits autophagy via NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES 1 (NPR1); notably, autophagy functions as a negative feedback loop to modulate SA signaling, which in turn constrains the progression of senescence and pathogen-triggered chlorotic cell death [46]. In Arabidopsis, ethylene-induced autophagy acts as a protective mechanism that enhances root cell survival in early waterlogging stress by targeting compromised mitochondria for degradation, which in turn limits reactive oxygen species (ROS) production under concomitant oxidative stress [47]. An elevation in intracellular abscisic acid (ABA) levels transiently reduces the persulfidation status of the ATG4 protein pool activating the protease activity of the enzyme and the processing of ATG8 that can be further lipidated to progress autophagy [48]. The phytohormone cytokinin and autophagy interact through a mechanism where selective autophagy, with EXO70D proteins acting as receptors, degrades type-A ARRs (negative regulators of cytokinin signaling) in an ATG5-dependent and phosphorylation-promoted manner to modulate plant sensitivity to cytokinin, while this autophagy–cytokinin interplay also contributes to plant survival under stress condition [49]. Jasmonic acid (JA) promotes chromatin remodeling to alleviate the repression of MYC transcription factors, thereby enhancing chromatin accessibility for downstream targets such as NAC DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN102 (ANAC102). Before abscission, ANAC102 specifically accumulates at the petal base, where it upregulates ATG gene expression. This induction triggers reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, cell death, and developmentally programmed autophagy, collectively contributing to petal abscission [50].
However, research on phytohormone-autophagy crosstalk in leguminous plants remains remarkably scarce; to date, only one study has been reported that the induction of GmATG8i in soybean plants under starvation stress is mediated by the ethylene signal [51]. Deciphering the phytohormonal regulation of autophagy holds the key to understanding how leguminous plants manage the critical trade-off between growth and stress adaptation (Figure 1).

2.2. Transcription Factors and Epigenetic Regulation of Autophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes

In Arabidopsis, TGA9 (TGACG (TGA) motif-binding protein 9) is a confirmed positive regulator of autophagy that binds the promoters of ATG8 genes [52]. Furthermore, PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4) and PIF5 directly bind to the promoters of core ATG genes, including ATG5, ATG12a/b, ATG8a/e/f/g, inducing their expression, and influencing nutrient starvation induced senescence, a hallmark autophagy ralated process [53]. ATG18a, a core component of the autophagic machinery in Arabidopsis, physically interacts with WRKY33 which is a transcription factor essential for mediating resistance against necrotrophic pathogens. Notably, infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea elicits the transcriptional upregulation of ATG genes and promotes autophagosome biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Importantly, the B. cinerea-triggered induction of ATG18a expression and autophagic activity was significantly impaired in the wrky33 loss-of-function mutant, which exhibits heightened susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens [54]. Yang et al. demonstrated that autophagy displays a robust circadian rhythm in Arabidopsis under both light/dark cycles (LD) and constant light (LL) conditions. Furthermore, they showed that under LD conditions, the transcription factor LUX ARRHYTHMO (LUX) directly binds to the promoters of core autophagy genes ATG2, ATG8a, and ATG11 to repress their expression. Consequently, the lux mutant exhibits a disrupted autophagy rhythm in LL and an increased rhythm amplitude in LD, due to the loss of this nocturnal repression [55]. The flowering transition factor SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC1, a MADS-box protein) acts as a transcriptional repressor of autophagy. Mechanistically, SOC1 binds directly to the CArG box elements in the promoters of key autophagy genes, including ATG4b, ATG7, and ATG18c, to suppress their expression [56]. The NAC (for NO APICAL MERISTEM/ARABIDOPSIS TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATION FACTOR/CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON) transcription factor ATAF1 (Arabidopsis Transcription Activation Factor1) regulates the expression of multiple autophagy-related genes. Overexpression of ATAF1 induces transcriptomic changes, upregulating 11 ATG genes in a pattern that mimics carbon starvation in wild-type plants. Conversely, ATAF1 depletion represses these genes. These findings suggest that ATAF1 acts as a key regulator of autophagy induction during carbon starvation [44]. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that elevated expression of the NAC domain transcription factor ANAC017 results in the upregulation of genes associated with mitochondrial stress, cell death, and autophagy under non-stress conditions, while also triggering extensive repression of chloroplast function and promoting a leaf senescence signature [57]. The transcription factor ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) recruits HISTONE DEACETYLASE 9 (HDA9) to the loci of ATG5 and ATG8e, thereby repressing their expression through histone deacetylation at H3K9 and H3K27. Consistently, HY5 deficiency leads to elevated ATG gene expression, enhanced autophagy activity, and, consequently, improved resistance to prolonged darkness and nitrogen starvation [58].
The function of TGACG-Binding (TGA) transcription factors, long recognized for defense roles in Arabidopsis, may extend beyond this, as evidenced by the discovery of two legume-specific GmTGA proteins in soybean, which are characterized by unique autophagy-associated sequence motifs [59]. Research investigating transcription factor- and epigenetic-mediated regulation of autophagy in leguminous plants remains notably scarce, highlighting an urgent need for in-depth studies in this underrepresented area.

3. Biological Functions of Autophagy in Arabidopsis and Leguminous Plants

Fueled by global warming and climate change, abiotic stressors including drought, extreme temperatures, and flooding are becoming more frequent and severe, posing a growing threat to agricultural yields and food security worldwide [60]. Moreover, climate change is reshaping the composition and dynamics of insect and pathogen communities, further exacerbating yield losses on a global scale. Agriculture is also constrained by the growing accumulation of anthropogenic pollutants and by climate-driven disruptions to soil microbiomes, which can impair ecosystem functioning and nutrient cycling [61]. A concentrated effort is needed to study how stress is affecting crops.

3.1. Biological Functions of Autophagy in Arabidopsis

Autophagy serves as a key regulatory mechanism for orchestrating adaptation to diverse abiotic and biotic stresses in Arabidopsis, specifically including nitrogen starvation [62], cold damage [63], heat stress [64,65,66], salt stress [67], drought [68,69], waterlogging stress [70], oxidative stress [71], wounding [72], cadmium stress [73], ammonium stress [74], zinc stress [75], nematode [76], virus, such as Turnip mosaic virus [77] and Cauliflower mosaic virus [78], bacteria, such as Pseudomonas syringae [79], and pathogen, such as Alternaria brassicicola [80,81], B. cinerea [54], Diplodia cupreessi [82], Golovinomyces cichoracearum [83,84], Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [85], Verticillium dahliae [86]. Research on autophagy in leguminous plants remains relatively scarce. Therefore, given legumes’ global importance in food security and sustainable agriculture, deciphering their autophagic regulation could inform strategies to enhance stress tolerance, optimize nitrogen use efficiency, and prolong nodule functionality, thereby addressing pressing challenges in crop improvement and ecological sustainability. Thus, legume autophagy research bridges fundamental cell biology with applied agricultural science, offering unique insights that transcend species-specific studies and advance the broader field of plant stress physiology and symbiosis (Figure 2).

3.2. Autophagy in Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Legumes

A set of 39 autophagy-related genes (ATGs) identified in M. truncatula showed significant upregulation during seed development and under drought stress, suggesting an important role for autophagy in these critical biological processes [87]. In Medicago sativa, cold stress triggers the transcriptional activation of MsATG13, which functions to integrate autophagic flux with the regulation of antioxidant levels, thereby mediating stress adaptation [88]. A M. truncatula dehydrin named MtCAS31 (Cold acclimation-specific 31) is a positive regulator of drought response and plays an important role in autophagic degradation of proteins, such as MtPIP2;7, which functions as a negative regulator of drought response. Under drought stress, MtCAS31 promotes the autophagic degradation of MtPIP2;7 and decreases root hydraulic conductivity, thus reducing water loss and enhancing drought tolerance [89]. In P. vulgaris, PvATG8c participated in virus-induced drought tolerance via autophagy mediated the degradation of PvERD15 (Early Responsive to Dehydration 15, which positively regulates stomatal aperture) [90]. Transmission electron microscopy analysis demonstrated that drought stress in Caragana korshinskii triggers autophagosome formation and chloroplast degradation, with the intensity of autophagic activity and cytoplasmic turnover increasing alongside stress severity, accompanied by a rise in sucrose levels—pointing to a coordinated physiological response [91]. In the response of Trifolium pratense L. (red clover) to Ag+ stress, autophagy is annotated as one of the stress-responsive pathways via Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, suggesting it may play a role in mediating the plant’s Ag+ tolerance [92].

3.3. Autophagy in Biotic Stress Defense of Legumes

In soybean, silencing of GmATG2 impairs autophagic degradation, accelerates dark-induced senescence, and activates immune responses, as evidenced by elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and salicylic acid (SA), upregulated expression of pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1), and enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinnea [39]. GmATG7 silencing impaired autophagy, accelerated dark-induced leaf senescence, induced H2O2 and SA accumulation to activate immunity, and enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinnea and Soybeann mosaic virus [93]. The glycine-rich plasma membranne PSS1 protein exhibited enhanced resistance to Fusarium virguliforme, the pathogen that causes sudden death syndrome, in transgenic soybean plants, and autophagy is proposed to be involved in this associated process [94]. In addition, in the symbiosis between M. truncatula and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, autophagy-related genes are expressed in AM fungal arbuscules, suggesting that autophagy may contribute to sustaining arbuscule function during this mutualistic interaction [95].

3.4. Autophagy in Seed Development and Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation of Legumes

GmATG8c constitutively expression in soybean callus enhanced the cells’ nitrogen starvation tolerance and accelerated callus growth, while transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmATG8c exhibited better performance under prolonged nitrogen and carbon starvation, faster growth, earlier bolting, larger primary and axillary inflorescences, and a 12.9% higher average seed yield than wild-type plants under optimal growth conditions, leading to the conclusion that GmATG8c is a promising candidate for breeding crops with improved nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and yield [96]. GmATG8c facilitates the redistribution of nitrogen from vegetative tissues to developing seeds, thereby positioning it as a potential initiator of leaf senescence [97]. In white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) and Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet), autophagy is constitutively active from the earliest stages of growth, including within embryonic seed organs. This process is markedly upregulated under nutrient deficit or starvation, thereby promoting survival under adverse conditions [40,98]. In P. vulgaris and G. max, 32 and 61 core ATG genes were identified. Notably, most ATG genes in Phaseolus exhibit nitrate-responsive expression patterns and are differentially regulated during rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses, suggesting their potential functional involvement in these symbiotic interactions [99,100,101]. In silico expression analysis, ATG genes of all groups were expressed in the root nodule of M. truncatula, this link between autophagy and symbiosis needs more attention [102]. Further evidence indicates that the interaction between MtNAD1 and MtATG8 functions to recruit the autophagy machinery for the targeted degradation of immunity-related proteins in M. truncatula nodules. This targeted proteolysis enables successful rhizobial colonization and the subsequent establishment of symbiosis [41]. Moreover, root- and nodule-predominant myotubularin phosphatase (M. truncatula, MtMP) promotes autophagy via dephosphorylating autophagosomal phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns3P); this MtMP-mediated autophagy (likely mitophagy in the nodule infection zone) supports symbiotic nitrogen fixation by sustaining nitrogenase activity and supplying carbon skeletons/nitrogen for bacteroid development and infected cell reprogramming, representing the first report of myotubularin phosphatase in plant autophagy [103]. In pea (P. sativum L.), autophagy-related genes are transcriptionally upregulated in leaves at the late stage of early seed development (27 days after flowering) and thus likely participate in nutrient recycling from leaves to support seed protein accumulation, a key determinant of pea protein yields [104]. Nitrogen constitutes one of the indispensable plant nutrients and serves as a key constraint on crop productivity. To fulfill the demands of sustainable agriculture, there is a need to maximize biological nitrogen fixation in legumes [105]. To date, overexpression of rice OsATG8b and OsATG8c was found to enhance autophagic activity, leading to a significant improvement in nitrogen remobilization efficiency (NRE) from vegetative tissues to seeds, as evidenced by 15N-labeling experiments [106,107]. The role of autophagy in regulating nitrogen remobilization has also been established in a range of other species, including maize [108], tomato [109], tea plants [110], and apple [111]. Therefore, elucidating the role of autophagy in leguminous plants, particularly its functions in nitrogen remobilization and symbiotic nitrogen fixation, represents a pivotal strategy for developing crops that require less fertilizer yet maintain high yield and improved nutritional quality [112].

4. Genome-Wide Identification of ATG8 Gene Family in Peanut

Peanut (A. hypogaea L.) is a valuable legume crop worldwide, possessing a favorable nutritional profile notably rich in proteins, healthy lipids, vitamins, and minerals, which contributes to its global significance [113]. However, the susceptibility to diverse abiotic and biotic stresses poses a major constraint to peanut productivity, leading to significant economic losses [114]. Beyond its well-established role in nutrient starvation, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that autophagy is also induced as an adaptive cellular response to diverse environmental challenges, including abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures, as well as biotic stresses [115,116]. ATG8 proteins play a central role in plant autophagy by not only promoting autophagosome formation but also interacting with various adaptor/receptor proteins, thereby recruiting specific cargo for degradation through selective autophagy [117]. Nine ATG8 isoforms have identified in Arabidopsis, nine in wheat [118], five in maize [119], seven in rice [120], seven in potato [121], and eleven in soybean [96]. To understand the role of autophagy response to abiotic and biotic stresses in peanut, a total of 13 members (named AhATG8a to AhATG8m) of the ATG8 gene family were identified in peanut through bioinformatics analysis (Figure 3 and Table 1).
In addition, gene expression pattern analysis revealed that AhATG8a, AhATG8b, AhATG8e, AhATG8f, AhATG8h, AhATG8l, AhATG8m, and particularly AhATG8i, exhibited high expression levels in the testa and cotyledons. Several genes encoding the core autophagy machinery are induced during seed development [122]. Research has shown that AtATG8b is involved in microlipophagy-mediated lipid droplet (LD) degradation in Arabidopsis. CALEOSIN family proteins CLO1, CLO2, and CLO3, as structural LD proteins, interact with AtATG8b via their putative ATG8-interacting motifs (AIMs). Specifically, the AIM preceding the proline knot in CLO1 is critical for its interaction with AtATG8b, indicating that these ATG8b-caleosins mediate the recruitment of LDs to the vacuole for degradation during seed germination [123]. The AhATG8s genes, which are highly expressed in the testa and cotyledons, may regulate lipid degradation via the autophagic pathway to participate in seed development. Furthermore, Crop legumes, including chickpea, common bean, cowpea, peanut, pigeonpea, and soybean, serve as vital nutritional sources and account for substantial biological nitrogen fixation in agriculture, with the fixed nitrogen exceeding 20 million tons annually [124]. AhATG8b and AhATG8h showed high expression in root nodules, implying that these two genes might be associated with nodule formation or biological nitrogen fixation processes. Under drought stress, the expression levels of AhATG8e and AhATG8m were upregulated, which demonstrates their role in responding to drought stress (Figure 4).

5. Perspectives

Leguminous plants exhibit extensive species diversity and a wide distribution, serving as high-quality food sources for humans and animals. Compared with Arabidopsis, research on autophagy in legumes remains relatively scarce. Therefore, conducting studies on autophagy in legumes can help identify potential stress resistance pathways and facilitate the breeding of new stress-tolerant legume varieties. Additionally, ATGs are involved in nodulation of leguminous plants, which will provide novel candidate genes for enhancing nitrogen-fixation capacity in legumes. Expression analysis of the AhATG8 gene family in peanut revealed that AhATG8b and AhATG8h were highly expressed in root nodules, indicating that these two genes may be involved in the biological nitrogen fixation process of peanut. Therefore, we could generate stable transgenic peanut plants overexpressing AhATG8b or AhATG8h. Conversely, use CRISPR-Cas9 to create knockout mutants for these genes. Phenotypic analysis should focus on nodulation (number, size, morphology), nitrogen fixation efficiency (measured by acetylene reduction assay), and overall plant growth under nitrogen-limiting conditions. Furthermore, AhATG8e and AhATG8m exhibited high expression levels under drought treatment condition, indicating that AhATG8e and AhATG8m participated in the drought response of peanut. Similarly, develop overexpression lines and knockout mutants for AhATG8e and AhATG8m. These plants should be subjected to controlled drought stress, and their performance should be evaluated based on water use efficiency, photosynthetic parameters, oxidative stress markers, and survival rates, alongside monitoring autophagic activity. Further investigations into the precise mechanisms governing the regulation, subcellular localization, protein interaction screening, and functional roles of peanut AhATG8 genes are essential, particularly regarding whether AhATG8s can activate autophagy to enhance the response to both abiotic and biotic stresses.

Author Contributions

L.F., X.C., M.G. and Z.W. designed the study. L.F. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. L.F., X.C. and Z.W. contributed to data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project supported by Henan Postdoctoral Foundation (2025) and Major Emergency Response Project for Agricultural Production in Henan Province (2024ZDYJ001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing does not apply to this article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the postdoctoral matching funding provided by the Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhong, Y.; Tian, J.; Li, X.; Liao, H. Cooperative interactions between nitrogen fixation and phosphorus nutrition in legumes. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 734–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jan, N.; Rather, A.M.; John, R.; Chaturvedi, P.; Ghatak, A.; Weckwerth, W.; Zargar, S.M.; Mir, R.A.; Khan, M.A.; Mir, R.R. Proteomics for abiotic stresses in legumes: Present status and future directions. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2023, 43, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, Z.X.; He, J.F.; Zhang, Y.C.; Bing, D.J. Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2593–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yadav, R.K.; Tripathi, M.K.; Tiwari, S.; Tripathi, N.; Asati, R.; Patel, V.; Sikarwar, R.S.; Payasi, D.K. Breeding and Genomic Approaches towards Development of Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Chickpea. Life 2023, 13, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Feng, F.; Tian, Z. Toward a “Green Revolution” for Soybean. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 688–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Farooq, A.; Sharma, V.; Sofi, S.A.; Bashir, S.; Rai, P.K.; Sofi, P.A.; Deveshwar, P.; Zargar, S.M. A comprehensive multi-omics approach for understanding common bean’s (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) response to phosphorus stress. Plant Sci. 2025, 359, 112632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, N.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Lu, Q.; Wang, K.; Dou, Z.; Chi, Z.; Qiu, W.; Dai, J.; et al. Microbiome convergence enables siderophore-secreting-rhizobacteria to improve iron nutrition and yield of peanut intercropped with maize. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; Zhu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Tadege, M.; Wu, S.; Qi, Z.; Xia, Z. Functional Genomics: From Soybean to Legume. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gao, J.P.; Su, Y.; Jiang, S.; Liang, W.; Lou, Z.; Frugier, F.; Xu, P.; Murray, J.D. Applying conventional and cell-type-specific CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in legume plants. aBIOTECH 2025, 6, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nzepang, D.T.; Cissoko, M.; Gully, D.; Hocher, V.; Rami, J.F.; Fall, S.; Fonceka, D.; Svistoonoff, S. Transcriptomic analysis reveals genetic factors underlying impaired symbiotic nitrogen fixation in lines derived from crosses between cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its wild ancestors. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, N.; Feng, Y.; Jiang, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, M. Genome-wide study and expression analysis of soybean ERF transcription factors and overexpression of GmERF205 enhances drought resistance in soybean. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martinez, M.A.; Montechiarini, N.H.; Gosparini, C.O.; Oppedijk, B.; van Duijn, B. Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Oxygen Consumption Rates and Germination of Green Soybean Seeds Produced Under Heat-Drought Stress. Plant Direct 2025, 9, e70100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, W.; Wang, X.; Wei, X.; Li, X.; Sun, J.; Dong, S. The impact of drought stress under different soil matrices on physiological characteristics of soybean seedlings. AoB Plants 2025, 17, plaf026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, L.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Mo, W.; Liu, H.; Tian, Z.; Li, L. Large-scale pairing identifies a soybean phytocytokine-receptor module conferring disease resistance. Nat. Plants 2025, 11, 1739–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z.; Lin, S.; et al. Metabolomics navigates natural variation in pathogen-induced secondary metabolism across soybean cultivar populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2505532122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buntic, A.; Jelusic, A.; Milic, M.; Dimitrijevic, S.; Buzurovic, U.; Milinkovic, M.; Knezevic, M. Antimicrobial peptides (AMP)-producing Bacillus spp. for the management of Fusarium infection and alfalfa growth promotion. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2025; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silva Volpato, N.D.; Gomez, F.M.; Gimenez, V.D.; Ciampitti, I.A. A global dataset on mungbean for managing seed yield and quality. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, W.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, C.; Zuo, L.; Miao, L.; Cui, X. Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2025, 105, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, Q.; Wang, R.; Zhu, L. Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1206, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Plott, S.; Dagdas, Y.F.; Ibl, V. Microautophagy in cereal grains: Protein storage or degradation? Trends Plant Sci. 2025, 30, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, S.H.; Park, O.K. N-degron-mediated ATG8 isoform switching controls plant thermotolerance. Autophagy 2025, 21, 2528–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, X.; Zhang, X.; Otegui, M.S. Plant autophagy: New flavors on the menu. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 46, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lv, X.; Pu, X.; Qin, G.; Zhu, T.; Lin, H. The roles of autophagy in development and stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Apoptosis 2014, 19, 905–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Q.; Hou, S. The emerging roles of ATG1/ATG13 kinase complex in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 271, 153653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sawa-Makarska, J.; Baumann, V.; Coudevylle, N.; von Bulow, S.; Nogellova, V.; Abert, C.; Schuschnig, M.; Graef, M.; Hummer, G.; Martens, S. Reconstitution of autophagosome nucleation defines Atg9 vesicles as seeds for membrane formation. Science 2020, 369, eaaz7714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cook, A.S.I.; Chen, M.; Nguyen, T.N.; Cabezudo, A.C.; Khuu, G.; Rao, S.; Garcia, S.N.; Yang, M.; Iavarone, A.T.; Ren, X.; et al. Structural pathway for PI3-kinase regulation by VPS15 in autophagy. Science 2025, 388, eadl3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Popelka, H.; Klionsky, D.J. When an underdog becomes a major player: The role of protein structural disorder in the Atg8 conjugation system. Autophagy 2024, 20, 2338–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhuang, X.; Li, B.; Jiang, L. Autophagosome biogenesis and organelle homeostasis in plant cells. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3009–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Patel, S.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. Arabidopsis ATG6 is required to limit the pathogen-associated cell death response. Autophagy 2008, 4, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marmagne, A.; Chardon, F.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C. A tissue-specific rescue strategy reveals the local roles of autophagy in leaves and seeds for resource allocation. Plant Physiol. 2024, 197, kiae647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, S.H.; Kwon, C.; Lee, J.H.; Chung, T. Genes for plant autophagy: Functions and interactions. Mol. Cells 2012, 34, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wada, S.; Hayashida, Y.; Izumi, M.; Kurusu, T.; Hanamata, S.; Kanno, K.; Kojima, S.; Yamaya, T.; Kuchitsu, K.; Makino, A.; et al. Autophagy supports biomass production and nitrogen use efficiency at the vegetative stage in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sera, Y.; Hanamata, S.; Sakamoto, S.; Ono, S.; Kaneko, K.; Mitsui, Y.; Koyano, T.; Fujita, N.; Sasou, A.; Masumura, T.; et al. Essential roles of autophagy in metabolic regulation in endosperm development during rice seed maturation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhen, X.; Xu, F.; Zhang, W.; Li, N.; Li, X. Overexpression of rice gene OsATG8b confers tolerance to nitrogen starvation and increases yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shi, M.; Luo, X.; Huang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xu, P.; Qian, Y.; et al. Duplicated OsATG9 Genes Antagonise Autophagy to Balance Growth and Drought Tolerance in Rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 6397–6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, M.; Ma, L.; Tang, Y.; Yang, W.; Yang, Y.; Xi, J.; Wang, X.; Zhu, W.; Xue, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Maize Autophagy-Related Protein ZmATG3 Confers Tolerance to Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Plants 2024, 13, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J.; Hu, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, Q.; et al. Manipulation of the central autophagy component ZmATG8c affects thermotolerance in maize. Plant Physiol. 2025, 199, kiaf299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Z.; Luo, F.; Meng, C.; Si, J.; Zhang, W.; Sun, J.; Wang, Z. Identification of the ZmATG18 subfamily genes in maize and the role of ZmATG18a in drought stress. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hashimi, S.M.; Wu, N.N.; Ran, J.; Liu, J.Z. Silencing Autophagy-Related Gene 2 (ATG2) Results in Accelerated Senescence and Enhanced Immunity in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Borek, S.; Stefaniak, S.; Nuc, K.; Wojtyla, L.; Ratajczak, E.; Sitkiewicz, E.; Malinowska, A.; Swiderska, B.; Wleklik, K.; Pietrowska-Borek, M. Sugar Starvation Disrupts Lipid Breakdown by Inducing Autophagy in Embryonic Axes of Lupin (Lupinus spp.) Germinating Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dong, R.; Wang, W.; Luo, N.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Zhu, H.; Li, F.; Yu, H.; et al. MtNAD1 associates with the autophagy complex to contribute to the degradation of immunity-related proteins in Medicago truncatula nodules. New Phytol. 2025, 245, 2186–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Agbemafle, W.; Wong, M.M.; Bassham, D.C. Transcriptional and post-translational regulation of plant autophagy. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 6006–6022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liao, C.Y.; Wang, P.; Yin, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Interactions between autophagy and phytohormone signaling pathways in plants. FEBS Lett. 2022, 596, 2198–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, C.; Luo, M.; Zhuang, X.; Li, F.; Gao, C. Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Autophagy in Plants. Trends Genet. 2020, 36, 676–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liao, C.Y.; Pu, Y.; Nolan, T.M.; Montes, C.; Guo, H.; Walley, J.W.; Yin, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Brassinosteroids modulate autophagy through phosphorylation of RAPTOR1B by the GSK3-like kinase BIN2 in Arabidopsis. Autophagy 2023, 19, 1293–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yoshimoto, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Kamiya, Y.; Kusano, M.; Consonni, C.; Panstruga, R.; Ohsumi, Y.; Shirasu, K. Autophagy negatively regulates cell death by controlling NPR1-dependent salicylic acid signaling during senescence and the innate immune response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2914–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, Q.; Li, G.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Z. The relationship between ethylene-induced autophagy and reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis root cells during the early stages of waterlogging stress. PeerJ 2023, 11, e15404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Laureano-Marin, A.M.; Aroca, A.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Yruela, I.; Jurado-Flores, A.; Moreno, I.; Crespo, J.L.; Romero, L.C.; Gotor, C. Abscisic Acid-Triggered Persulfidation of the Cys Protease ATG4 Mediates Regulation of Autophagy by Sulfide. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3902–3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Acheampong, A.K.; Shanks, C.; Cheng, C.Y.; Schaller, G.E.; Dagdas, Y.; Kieber, J.J. EXO70D isoforms mediate selective autophagic degradation of type-A ARR proteins to regulate cytokinin sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27034–27043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Furuta, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Hirakawa, T.; Uemura, A.; Pelayo, M.A.; Iimura, H.; Katagiri, N.; Takeda-Kamiya, N.; Kumaishi, K.; Shirakawa, M.; et al. Petal abscission is promoted by jasmonic acid-induced autophagy at Arabidopsis petal bases. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Okuda, M.; Nang, M.P.; Oshima, K.; Ishibashi, Y.; Zheng, S.H.; Yuasa, T.; Iwaya-Inoue, M. The ethylene signal mediates induction of GmATG8i in soybean plants under starvation stress. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011, 75, 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, P.; Nolan, T.M.; Yin, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Identification of transcription factors that regulate ATG8 expression and autophagy in Arabidopsis. Autophagy 2020, 16, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, J.; Kang, M.H.; Choi, D.M.; Marmagne, A.; Park, J.; Lee, H.; Gwak, E.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, J.I.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; et al. Phytochrome-interacting factors PIF4 and PIF5 directly regulate autophagy during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2025, 76, 1068–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lai, Z.; Wang, F.; Zheng, Z.; Fan, B.; Chen, Z. A critical role of autophagy in plant resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. Plant J. 2011, 66, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, M.K.; Zhu, X.J.; Chen, C.M.; Guo, X.; Xu, S.X.; Xu, Y.R.; Du, S.X.; Xiao, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Huang, W.; et al. The plant circadian clock regulates autophagy rhythm through transcription factor LUX ARRHYTHMO. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 2135–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, X.; Liao, J.; Bai, H.; Bei, J.; Li, K.; Luo, M.; Shen, W.; Yang, C.; Gao, C. Arabidopsis flowering integrator SOC1 transcriptionally regulates autophagy in response to long-term carbon starvation. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 6589–6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Meng, X.; Li, L.; De Clercq, I.; Narsai, R.; Xu, Y.; Hartmann, A.; Claros, D.L.; Custovic, E.; Lewsey, M.G.; Whelan, J.; et al. ANAC017 Coordinates Organellar Functions and Stress Responses by Reprogramming Retrograde Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 634–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, C.; Shen, W.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Lai, M.; Wei, J.; Wang, C.; Xu, Y.; Li, F.; et al. HY5-HDA9 Module Transcriptionally Regulates Plant Autophagy in Response to Light-to-Dark Conversion and Nitrogen Starvation. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ullah, I.; Magdy, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Li, X. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of TGA transcription factors in soybean. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Varadharajan, V.; Rajendran, R.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Runthala, A.; Madhesh, V.; Swaminathan, G.; Murugan, P.; Srinivasan, H.; Park, Y.; Shin, H.; et al. Multi-Omics Approaches Against Abiotic and Biotic Stress-A Review. Plants 2025, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rivero, R.M.; Mittler, R.; Blumwald, E.; Zandalinas, S.I. Developing climate-resilient crops: Improving plant tolerance to stress combination. Plant J. 2022, 109, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sankaranarayanan, S.; Samuel, M.A. A proposed role for selective autophagy in regulating auxin-dependent lateral root development under phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2015, 10, e989749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peng, Y.; Guo, S.; Lei, B.; Yu, L.; Wang, Q. Autophagy deficiency confers freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, Y.; Min, H.; Shi, C.; Xia, G.; Lai, Z. Transcriptome analysis of the role of autophagy in plant response to heat stress. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, S.H.; Park, J.S.; Lee, M.H.; Seo, J.; Kim, J.; Yang, W.S.; Park, J.; Yoo, K.; Choi, J.; Seo, J.B.; et al. The N-degron pathway governs autophagy to promote thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhou, J.; Ma, J.; Yang, C.; Zhu, X.; Li, J.; Zheng, X.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Feng, L.; Wang, P.; et al. A non-canonical role of ATG8 in Golgi recovery from heat stress in plants. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 749–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, B.; Niu, F.; Zeng, Y.; Tse, M.K.; Deng, C.; Hong, L.; Gao, S.; Lo, S.W.; Cao, W.; Huang, S.; et al. Ufmylation reconciles salt stress-induced unfolded protein responses via ER-phagy in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2208351120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Liu, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Autophagy is required for tolerance of drought and salt stress in plants. Autophagy 2009, 5, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cheng, S.; Fan, S.; Yang, C.; Hu, W.; Liu, F. Proteomics revealed novel functions and drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana protein kinase ATG1. BMC Biol. 2025, 23, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chen, L.; Liao, B.; Qi, H.; Xie, L.J.; Huang, L.; Tan, W.J.; Zhai, N.; Yuan, L.B.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, L.J.; et al. Autophagy contributes to regulation of the hypoxia response during submergence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Autophagy 2015, 11, 2233–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xiong, Y.; Contento, A.L.; Bassham, D.C. Disruption of autophagy results in constitutive oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Autophagy 2007, 3, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Katz, E.; Chamovitz, D.A. Wounding of Arabidopsis leaves induces indole-3-carbinol-dependent autophagy in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2017, 91, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Calero-Munoz, N.; Exposito-Rodriguez, M.; Collado-Arenal, A.M.; Rodriguez-Serrano, M.; Laureano-Marin, A.M.; Santamaria, M.E.; Gotor, C.; Diaz, I.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; et al. Cadmium induces reactive oxygen species-dependent pexophagy in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2696–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Robert, G.; Yagyu, M.; Lascano, H.R.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Yoshimoto, K. A proposed role for endomembrane trafficking processes in regulating tonoplast content and vacuole dynamics under ammonium stress conditions in Arabidopsis root cells. Plant Signal Behav. 2021, 16, 1924977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shinozaki, D.; Tanoi, K.; Yoshimoto, K. Optimal Distribution of Iron to Sink Organs via Autophagy Is Important for Tolerance to Excess Zinc in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 62, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, J.; Chen, S.; Xu, C.; Yang, H.; Achom, M.; Wang, X. A key virulence effector from cyst nematodes targets host autophagy to promote nematode parasitism. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 1374–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, G.; Jia, Z.; Ding, K.; Zheng, H.; Lu, Y.; Lin, L.; Peng, J.; Rao, S.; Wang, A.; Chen, J.; et al. Turnip mosaic virus co-opts the vacuolar sorting receptor VSR4 to promote viral genome replication in plants by targeting viral replication vesicles to the endosome. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zvereva, A.S.; Golyaev, V.; Turco, S.; Gubaeva, E.G.; Rajeswaran, R.; Schepetilnikov, M.V.; Srour, O.; Ryabova, L.A.; Boller, T.; Pooggin, M.M. Viral protein suppresses oxidative burst and salicylic acid-dependent autophagy and facilitates bacterial growth on virus-infected plants. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 1020–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jeon, H.S.; Jang, E.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, M.H.; Nam, M.H.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Park, O.K. Pathogen-induced autophagy regulates monolignol transport and lignin formation in plant immunity. Autophagy 2023, 19, 597–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Lenz, H.D.; Vierstra, R.D.; Nurnberger, T.; Gust, A.A. ATG7 contributes to plant basal immunity towards fungal infection. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 1040–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kumari, M.; Pandey, S.; Mishra, S.K.; Giri, V.P.; Agarwal, L.; Dwivedi, S.; Pandey, A.K.; Nautiyal, C.S.; Mishra, A. Omics-Based Mechanistic Insight Into the Role of Bioengineered Nanoparticles for Biotic Stress Amelioration by Modulating Plant Metabolic Pathways. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Samperna, S.; Masi, M.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A.; Marra, M. Cyclopaldic Acid, the Main Phytotoxic Metabolite of Diplodia cupressi, Induces Programmed Cell Death and Autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Toxins 2022, 14, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Tang, D. The autophagy gene, ATG18a, plays a negative role in powdery mildew resistance and mildew-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 1408–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Y.; Nishimura, M.T.; Zhao, T.; Tang, D. ATG2, an autophagy-related protein, negatively affects powdery mildew resistance and mildew-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011, 68, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kabbage, M.; Williams, B.; Dickman, M.B. Cell death control: The interplay of apoptosis and autophagy in the pathogenicity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, F.X.; Luo, Y.M.; Ye, Z.Q.; Cao, X.; Liang, J.N.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wu, J.H.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, M.; et al. iTRAQ-based proteomics analysis of autophagy-mediated immune responses against the vascular fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis. Autophagy 2018, 14, 598–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Guo, X.; Lin, C.; Huang, W.; Chen, L. Genome-wide analysis of autophagy-related genes in Medicago truncatula highlights their roles in seed development and response to drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, W.; Song, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, X.; Du, B.; An, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, D.; Guo, C. Alfalfa MsATG13 Confers Cold Stress Tolerance to Plants by Promoting Autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Feng, H.; Deng, J.; Zhang, R.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. Dehydrin MtCAS31 promotes autophagic degradation under drought stress. Autophagy 2020, 16, 862–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Sun, T.; Ning, K.; Xu, M.; Ke, X.; Xu, P. A viral small interfering RNA-host plant mRNA pathway modulates virus-induced drought tolerance by enhancing autophagy. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3219–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Luo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Bai, J. Drought stress-induced autophagy gene expression is correlated with carbohydrate concentrations in Caragana korshinskii. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1211–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mo, F.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, M.; Li, Z.; Deng, N.; Yang, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, R.; et al. Physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional regulation in a leguminous forage Trifolium pratense L. responding to silver ions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hashimi, S.M.; Huang, M.J.; Amini, M.Q.; Wang, W.X.; Liu, T.Y.; Chen, Y.; Liao, L.N.; Lan, H.J.; Liu, J.Z. Silencing GmATG7 Leads to Accelerated Senescence and Enhanced Disease Resistance in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, B.; Sumit, R.; Sahu, B.B.; Ngaki, M.N.; Srivastava, S.K.; Yang, Y.; Swaminathan, S.; Bhattacharyya, M.K. Arabidopsis Novel Glycine-Rich Plasma Membrane PSS1 Protein Enhances Disease Resistance in Transgenic Soybean Plants. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gomez, S.K.; Javot, H.; Deewatthanawong, P.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Tang, Y.; Blancaflor, E.B.; Udvardi, M.K.; Harrison, M.J. Medicago truncatula and Glomus intraradices gene expression in cortical cells harboring arbuscules in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xia, T.; Xiao, D.; Liu, D.; Chai, W.; Gong, Q.; Wang, N.N. Heterologous expression of ATG8c from soybean confers tolerance to nitrogen deficiency and increases yield in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Islam, M.M.; Ishibashi, Y.; Nakagawa, A.C.; Tomita, Y.; Iwaya-Inoue, M.; Arima, S.; Zheng, S.H. Nitrogen redistribution and its relationship with the expression of GmATG8c during seed filling in soybean. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 192, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wleklik, K.; Stefaniak, S.; Nuc, K.; Pietrowska-Borek, M.; Borek, S. Identification and Potential Participation of Lipases in Autophagic Body Degradation in Embryonic Axes of Lupin (Lupinus spp.) Germinating Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 25, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Quezada-Rodriguez, E.H.; Gomez-Velasco, H.; Arthikala, M.K.; Lara, M.; Hernandez-Lopez, A.; Nanjareddy, K. Exploration of Autophagy Families in Legumes and Dissection of the ATG18 Family with a Special Focus on Phaseolus vulgaris. Plants 2021, 10, 2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hernandez-Lopez, A.; Diaz, M.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.; Guillen, G.; Sanchez, F.; Diaz-Camino, C. Uncovering Bax inhibitor-1 dual role in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis in common bean roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nanjareddy, K.; Blanco, L.; Arthikala, M.K.; Alvarado-Affantranger, X.; Quinto, C.; Sanchez, F.; Lara, M. A Legume TOR Protein Kinase Regulates Rhizobium Symbiosis and Is Essential for Infection and Nodule Development. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 2002–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Semenova, M.G.; Petina, A.N.; Fedorova, E.E. Autophagy and Symbiosis: Membranes, ER, and Speculations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xue, Q.; Shen, C.; Liu, Q.; Liu, P.; Guo, D.; Zheng, L.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Ye, Q.; Wang, T.; et al. The PtdIns3P phosphatase MtMP promotes symbiotic nitrogen fixation via mitophagy in Medicago truncatula. iScience 2023, 26, 107752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gallardo, K.; Besson, A.; Klein, A.; Le Signor, C.; Aubert, G.; Henriet, C.; Terezol, M.; Pateyron, S.; Sanchez, M.; Trouverie, J.; et al. Transcriptional Reprogramming of Pea Leaves at Early Reproductive Stages. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sharma, V.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, A.; Ibanez, F.; Wang, J.; Guo, B.; Sudini, H.K.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; DasGupta, M.; et al. Molecular Basis of Root Nodule Symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium and ‘Crack-Entry’ Legume Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plants 2020, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhen, X.; Zheng, N.; Yu, J.; Bi, C.; Xu, F. Autophagy mediates grain yield and nitrogen stress resistance by modulating nitrogen remobilization in rice. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0244996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhen, X.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Xu, F. OsATG8c-Mediated Increased Autophagy Regulates the Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, F.; Chung, T.; Pennington, J.G.; Federico, M.L.; Kaeppler, H.F.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Otegui, M.S.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic recycling plays a central role in maize nitrogen remobilization. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1389–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Cao, J.; Zheng, X.; Xie, D.; Zhou, H.; Shao, S.; Zhou, J. Autophagic pathway contributes to low-nitrogen tolerance by optimizing nitrogen uptake and utilization in tomato. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Huang, W.; Ma, D.N.; Liu, H.L.; Luo, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, M.L.; Guo, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Ni, D.J. Genome-Wide Identification of CsATGs in Tea Plant and the Involvement of CsATG8e in Nitrogen Utilization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sun, X.; Jia, X.; Huo, L.; Che, R.; Gong, X.; Wang, P.; Ma, F. MdATG18a overexpression improves tolerance to nitrogen deficiency and regulates anthocyanin accumulation through increased autophagy in transgenic apple. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Thanthrige, N.; Bhowmik, S.D.; Williams, B. ‘Friend versus foe’-does autophagy help regulate symbiotic plant-microbe interactions and can it be manipulated to improve legume cultivation? FEBS Lett. 2025, 599, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Qiu, D.; Li, Z.; Gong, F.; Yin, D. Research Progress on High-Protein Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties in China. Plants 2025, 14, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Huang, R.; Li, H.; Gao, C.; Yu, W.; Zhang, S. Advances in omics research on peanut response to biotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Chen, H.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. Autophagy in Plant Abiotic Stress Management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gross, A.S.; Raffeiner, M.; Zeng, Y.; Ustun, S.; Dagdas, Y. Autophagy in Plant Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2025, 76, 197–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bu, F.; Yang, M.; Guo, X.; Huang, W.; Chen, L. Multiple Functions of ATG8 Family Proteins in Plant Autophagy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pei, D.; Zhang, W.; Sun, H.; Wei, X.; Yue, J.; Wang, H. Identification of autophagy-related genes ATG4 and ATG8 from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and profiling of their expression patterns responding to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 1697–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chung, T.; Suttangkakul, A.; Vierstra, R.D. The ATG autophagic conjugation system in maize: ATG transcripts and abundance of the ATG8-lipid adduct are regulated by development and nutrient availability. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Xia, K.; Liu, T.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, R.; Fan, T.; Zhang, M. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of autophagy-associated gene homologues in rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res. 2011, 18, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Song, I.; Hong, S.; Huh, S.U. Identification and Expression Analysis of the Solanum tuberosum StATG8 Family Associated with the WRKY Transcription Factor. Plants 2022, 11, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Honig, A.; Avin-Wittenberg, T.; Galili, G. Selective autophagy in the aid of plant germination and response to nutrient starvation. Autophagy 2012, 8, 838–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Miklaszewska, M.; Zienkiewicz, K.; Klugier-Borowska, E.; Rygielski, M.; Feussner, I.; Zienkiewicz, A. CALEOSIN 1 interaction with AUTOPHAGY-RELATED PROTEIN 8 facilitates lipid droplet microautophagy in seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2023, 193, 2361–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ramalingam, A.; Kudapa, H.; Pazhamala, L.T.; Weckwerth, W.; Varshney, R.K. Proteomics and Metabolomics: Two Emerging Areas for Legume Improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Regulation of autophagy by diverse phytohormones in Arabidopsis and leguminous plants. In Arabidopsis, BR can regulate autophagy both positively and negatively, whereas SA, ET, ABA, JA, and CK activates autophagy during biotic or abiotic stress conditions. In leguminous plants, ET activates autophagy under starvation stress conditon. The figure was prepared using Adobe Illustrator CC 2017 software package. The question marks indicate that the role of the corresponding phytohormone in the regulation of autophagy is currently unknown in legumes.
Figure 1. Regulation of autophagy by diverse phytohormones in Arabidopsis and leguminous plants. In Arabidopsis, BR can regulate autophagy both positively and negatively, whereas SA, ET, ABA, JA, and CK activates autophagy during biotic or abiotic stress conditions. In leguminous plants, ET activates autophagy under starvation stress conditon. The figure was prepared using Adobe Illustrator CC 2017 software package. The question marks indicate that the role of the corresponding phytohormone in the regulation of autophagy is currently unknown in legumes.
Genes 16 01343 g001
Figure 2. Biological functions of autophagy in Arabidopsis and leguminous plants. Autophagy is involved in regulating plant responses to various abiotic and biotic stresses. Additionally, in leguminous plants, autophagy further participates in the process of biological nitrogen fixation—a function unique to this plant family. However, compared with Arabidopsis, research investigating the role of autophagy in leguminous plants’ defense against abiotic and biotic stresses remains remarkably scarce, highlighting an urgent need for more in-depth studies in this area.
Figure 2. Biological functions of autophagy in Arabidopsis and leguminous plants. Autophagy is involved in regulating plant responses to various abiotic and biotic stresses. Additionally, in leguminous plants, autophagy further participates in the process of biological nitrogen fixation—a function unique to this plant family. However, compared with Arabidopsis, research investigating the role of autophagy in leguminous plants’ defense against abiotic and biotic stresses remains remarkably scarce, highlighting an urgent need for more in-depth studies in this area.
Genes 16 01343 g002
Figure 3. The chromosome distribution of AhATG8 family genes in A. hypogaea. The AhATG8s sequences data derived from the PeanutBase (13 October 2025, https://www.peanutbase.org, A. hypogaea Tifrunner Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.CCJH Annotations) with default parameters. This image was generated with MG2C v2.1 (http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.1/index.html, accessed on 15 October 2025).
Figure 3. The chromosome distribution of AhATG8 family genes in A. hypogaea. The AhATG8s sequences data derived from the PeanutBase (13 October 2025, https://www.peanutbase.org, A. hypogaea Tifrunner Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.CCJH Annotations) with default parameters. This image was generated with MG2C v2.1 (http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.1/index.html, accessed on 15 October 2025).
Genes 16 01343 g003
Figure 4. Expression profile of AhATGs genes of A. hypogaea in different tissues and treatments. Transcriptome data regarding the expression levels (Normalized expression values in FPKM) of all AhATG8 members across 29 different peanut tissues and treatments were obtained from the PeanutGenomeResource website (http://peanutgr.fafu.edu.cn/Transcriptome.php#results, accessed on 15 October 2025). The heatmap was generated using the HeatMap function in TBtools v2.152 software, log scale (base = 2 and logwith = 1).
Figure 4. Expression profile of AhATGs genes of A. hypogaea in different tissues and treatments. Transcriptome data regarding the expression levels (Normalized expression values in FPKM) of all AhATG8 members across 29 different peanut tissues and treatments were obtained from the PeanutGenomeResource website (http://peanutgr.fafu.edu.cn/Transcriptome.php#results, accessed on 15 October 2025). The heatmap was generated using the HeatMap function in TBtools v2.152 software, log scale (base = 2 and logwith = 1).
Genes 16 01343 g004
Table 1. The AhATG8s gene family members of A. hypogaea.
Table 1. The AhATG8s gene family members of A. hypogaea.
MemberLocusChromosomal LocationGene Length/bpProtein Length/bp
AhATG8aarahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.JG4KI1.1Chr01:39903752-399071613410156
AhATG8barahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.EXRI64.1Chr01:103592801-1035949562156119
AhATG8carahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.IDQ1YW.1Chr04:4930217-49367056489230
AhATG8darahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.6U9WS0.1Chr06:103978667-1039811222456125
AhATG8earahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.63V2PN.1Chr09:18979110-189850835974118
AhATG8farahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.0A7WSD.1Chr11:48330080-48333436 3357122
AhATG8garahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.SY21CD.1Chr11:132703325-1327047471423123
AhATG8harahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.8SMT51.1Chr11:137923012-1379268683857177
AhATG8iarahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.X3Q019.1Chr13:17577237-175802653029120
AhATG8jarahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.CQM6UK.1Chr14:6182864-61851382275119
AhATG8karahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.E4CLSM.1Chr15:15136078-151389242847114
AhATG8larahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.ZFW017.1Chr18:7807375-78094762102120
AhATG8marahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.HJA00B.1Chr19:24321913-243279786066136
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, L.; Cui, X.; Gao, M.; Wang, Z. From Model to Crop: Roles of Macroautophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes. Genes 2025, 16, 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111343

AMA Style

Feng L, Cui X, Gao M, Wang Z. From Model to Crop: Roles of Macroautophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes. Genes. 2025; 16(11):1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Lanlan, Xiaowei Cui, Meng Gao, and Zhenyu Wang. 2025. "From Model to Crop: Roles of Macroautophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes" Genes 16, no. 11: 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111343

APA Style

Feng, L., Cui, X., Gao, M., & Wang, Z. (2025). From Model to Crop: Roles of Macroautophagy in Arabidopsis and Legumes. Genes, 16(11), 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop