Next Article in Journal
Exome Sequencing Reveals SLC4A11 Variant Underlying Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED2) Misdiagnosed as Congenital Glaucoma
Previous Article in Journal
Association of CYP24A1 Gene rs6127099 (A > T) Polymorphism with Lower Risk to COVID-19 Infection in Kazakhstan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020308
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome

by
Ayana Hashimoto
1,
Takuya Hirose
2,
Kohei Hashimoto
1,
Shuji Mizumoto
3,
Yuko Nitahara-Kasahara
4,
Shota Saka
1,
Takahiro Yoshizawa
5,
Takashi Okada
4,
Shuhei Yamada
3,
Tomoki Kosho
6,7,8,9,
Takafumi Watanabe
2,
Shinji Miyata
1,* and
Yoshihiro Nomura
1
1
Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwaicho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
2
Laboratory of Veterinary Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu 069-8501, Hokkaido, Japan
3
Department of Pathobiochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, Nagoya 468-8503, Aichi, Japan
4
Division of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Center for Gene and Cell Therapy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
5
Division of Animal Research, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto 390-8621, Nagano, Japan
6
Department of Medical Genetics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Nagano, Japan
7
Center for Medical Genetics, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto 390-8621, Nagano, Japan
8
Division of Clinical Sequencing, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Nagano, Japan
9
Research Center for Supports to Advanced Science, Matsumoto 390-8621, Nagano, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020308
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 18 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Loss-of-function mutations in carbohydrate sulfotransferase 14 (CHST14) cause musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos syndrome-CHST14 (mcEDS-CHST14), characterized by multiple congenital malformations and progressive connective tissue fragility-related manifestations in the cutaneous, skeletal, cardiovascular, visceral and ocular system. The replacement of dermatan sulfate chains on decorin proteoglycan with chondroitin sulfate chains is proposed to lead to the disorganization of collagen networks in the skin. However, the pathogenic mechanisms of mcEDS-CHST14 are not fully understood, partly due to the lack of in vitro models of this disease. In the present study, we established in vitro models of fibroblast-mediated collagen network formation that recapacitate mcEDS-CHST14 pathology. Electron microscopy analysis of mcEDS-CHST14-mimicking collagen gels revealed an impaired fibrillar organization that resulted in weaker mechanical strength of the gels. The addition of decorin isolated from patients with mcEDS-CHST14 and Chst14−/− mice disturbed the assembly of collagen fibrils in vitro compared to control decorin. Our study may provide useful in vitro models of mcEDS-CHST14 to elucidate the pathomechanism of this disease.

1. Introduction

Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of heritable connective tissue disorders characterized by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, and tissue fragility [1,2]. Currently, EDS is classified into 14 subtypes based on clinical, molecular and biochemical features according to the 2017 International Classification and more recent updates [3,4]. Dominant negative effects or haploinsufficiency of mutant procollagen α-chain genes or deficiency of collagen-processing enzymes have been identified as the basis for various types of EDS [4,5].
Musculocontractural EDS-CHST14 (mcEDS-CHST14) is a recently delineated subtype of EDS caused by biallelic loss-of-function mutations in CHST14 [6,7,8,9]. Clinical characteristics of mcEDS-CHST14 include multiple malformations (e.g., craniofacial features, multiple congenital contractures, ocular and visceral malformations) and progressive fragility-related multisystem manifestations (e.g., skin hyperextensibility and fragility, joint hypermobility, progressive spinal and foot deformities, large subcutaneous hematomas, and visceral ruptures) [6,10]. CHST14 encodes dermatan 4-O-sulfotransferase 1, a Golgi-resident enzyme essential for the biosynthesis of dermatan sulfate (DS) chains [11,12]. DS, a type of linear sulfated polysaccharide called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), is built up by repeating disaccharide units of iduronic acid (IdoA) and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc). Dermatan is formed by converting a precursor GAG called chondroitin comprising glucuronic acid (GlcA) and GalNAc [13]. Epimerization of GlcA in chondroitin to IdoA by dermatan sulfate epimerase (DSE) and subsequent sulfation of the C4-position of GalNAc by CHST14 completes the biosynthesis of DS chains. DS chains are covalently attached to specific core proteins to form DS-proteoglycans widely distributed in the extracellular matrix. The epimerization reaction in vitro is reversible and favors GlcA formation, whereas the sulfation by CHST14 is irreversible [14]. CHST14 and DSE form complexes in the Golgi apparatus that generate long stretches of IdoA contain disaccharides [15]. Therefore, patients with mcEDS-CHST14 lacking functional CHST14 exhibit marked loss of DS with an excess amount of chondroitin sulfate (CS), which results from the replacement of DS with CS in their connective tissues, including skin [7].
Patients with mcEDS-CHST14 and mice model of mcEDS-CHST14 deficient in Chst14 (Chst14−/−) shows misoriented collagen fibrils, disorganized collagen fibers, and decreased skin tensile strength [7,8,16,17]. It has been proposed that the disturbed assembly of collagen networks is caused by the structural alteration of GAG chains on decorin [8,16,18]. CS chains are linear and extend from the outer surface of collagen fibrils, whereas DS chains are curved and maintain close contact with attached collagen fibrils [16]. Decorin is a major DS-proteoglycan in the connective tissues and plays an essential role in collagen fibrillogenesis [19]. However, the molecular consequences of CHST14 mutations in the pathology of mcEDS-CHST14 are not fully understood, partly due to the lack of in vitro models that recapitulate pathogenic alterations in collagen network formation.
Fibroblasts cultured within free-floating type I collagen gels reorganize the surrounding collagen fibrils into a more dense and compact arrangement [20,21,22]. This fibroblast-mediated remodeling of collagen network provides an effective in vitro model for studying skin morphogenesis and pathogenesis. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impacts of fibroblasts derived from patients with mcEDS-CHST14 on remodeling type I collagen network in vitro. We also examined the effects of decorin isolated from patients’ fibroblasts on fibrillar organization. We revealed an impaired collagen assembly in the human and mouse models of mcEDS-CHST14 that emphasize the usefulness of the in vitro pathological model to elucidate the pathomechanism of this disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Chst14−/− mice were generated as described previously [23,24]. All experimental procedures were approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee at Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry), Nippon Medical School, and Shinshu University. Mice were housed in a micro isolator, at 23 ± 2 °C, with constant humidity and a 12 h light/dark cycle. Mice had free access to tap water and standard mouse chow.

2.2. Primary Fibroblast Culture

The dermal fibroblasts were established from skin specimens obtained through a standard procedure. We used skin fibroblasts from two patients with mcEDS-CHST14 (NM_130468.3) (patient 3, a 32-year-old man: [c.842C>T];[c.842C>T],p.[Pro281Leu];[Pro281Leu]; patient 6, a 4-year-old girl: [c.842C>T];[c.878A>G],p.[Pro281Leu];[p.Tyr293Cys]) as described previously [7]. Normal human fibroblasts from healthy individuals were purchased from Japan Health Sciences Foundation. Human and mouse dermal fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 U/mL streptomycin.

2.3. Quantification of DS Chains

GAGs in the cultured medium of fibroblasts were analyzed as described previously [7]. Briefly, samples were individually digested with chondroitinase AC (Seikagaku Co. Tokyo, Japan) or B (IBEX Pharmaceuticals, Montreal, QC, Canada) for the specific analysis of CS or DS moiety, respectively. After conjugation with 2-aminobenzamide, the labeled disaccharides were separated by anion-exchange HPLC on a PA-G silica column (4.6 × 150 mm; YMC Co. Kyoto, Japan) and monitored using a fluorometric detector. The identification and quantification of the resulting disaccharides were achieved by comparisons with the elution positions of DS-derived authentic unsaturated disaccharides. The amounts of DS disaccharides were normalized by protein levels.

2.4. Preparation of Fibroblast-Embedded Collagen Gel

The collagen gels were prepared as described previously with minor modifications [22]. Briefly, 1 × 106 dermal fibroblasts were suspended in 4 mL of DMEM containing FBS, sodium bicarbonate, penicillin, and streptomycin. Then, 4 mL of the cell suspension was mixed with 2 mL of bovine type I collagen acidic solution (3 mg/mL, pH 3.0, Nitta Gelatin Co., Osaka, Japan, #IAC-30). Then, 5 mL of the mixture was placed in a 6-well plastic dish and incubated, at 37 °C, for allowing gelation of collagen. The resultant collagen gels containing fibroblasts were detached from the surrounding brim of plastic dishes and maintained, at 37 °C, in air supplemented with 5% CO2. The gel contraction was evaluated by measuring the diameter of the gels at the indicated time. We used the 0.1% collagen gels for gel contraction assay and transmission electron microscopy analysis and 0.22% collagen gels for measuring the breaking strength and scanning electron microscopy analysis.

2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy was performed as described previously [16,17]. Briefly, the collagen gels were prefixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h, at room temperature, and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in phosphate buffer for 1 h, at room temperature. After washing with water, gels were dehydrated in ethanol and transferred to QY-1 (Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were embedded in the epoxy-resin mixture (Nisshin EM), cut into ultrathin sections, and observed by transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1220; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described previously [17]. Briefly, the collagen gels were prefixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer for 2 h, at room temperature, and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in phosphate buffer for 1 h, at room temperature. After washing with phosphate buffer, the gels were incubated with 1.0% tannic acid in water for 30 min. The gels were again fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, at room temperature, and washed with phosphate buffer. The samples were then dried by the t-butyl alcohol freeze-drying method, mounted on metal stubs, coated with platina using an ion sputter (JUC-5000; JEOL), and observed under a scanning electron microscope (JSM-5200; JEOL).

2.7. Mechanical Strength Measurement of Collagen Gel

Mechanical strength of the collagen gel was analyzed using a creep meter (RE-33005, Yamaden) as described previously [25]. The breaking strength was measured in 60% humidity, at 25 °C, using a cylindrical probe (diameter 5 mm) moving into the gel at a speed of 5 mm/min. The penetration of the probe was stopped halfway in the whole thickness of the gel specimen. The peak top of the stress–strain curve was defined as the breaking point of a gel. The measurement was repeated 8 times for each gel.

2.8. Isolation of Decorin

Human decorin was isolated from the cultured medium of normal and the patient’s fibroblasts. Serum-free cultured medium (700–900 mL) was collected, freeze-dried, and dissolved in the extraction buffer (7 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 M NaCl, and protease inhibitors). The extract was applied to a DEAE-Toyopearl 650 M column (Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan) equilibrated with the extraction buffer. Decorin was eluted with stepwise increases of 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl. Fractionated samples were precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in 0.4 mL of water. For mouse decorin, skin powder was delipidated by mixing with ethanol and extracted with 4 M guanidine hydrochloride solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 M NaCl, 5 mM benzamidine hydrochloride, and 10 mM EDTA, at 4 °C, for 72 h with rotating. After centrifugation, the supernatant was dialyzed against the extraction buffer and applied to a DEAE column as described.
To detect decorin, we separated samples by acrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred them onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and incubated them with the following primary antibodies: anti-human decorin (mouse IgG1, 1:1000, R&D #115402), and anti-mouse decorin (goat IgG, 1:1000, R&D #AF1060). After washing, the membranes were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies and developed using a chemiluminescent peroxidase substrate (Millipore). For human decorin, the 0.5 M NaCl fraction was collected, and for mouse decorin, the 0.3 M and 0.5 M NaCl fractions were pooled and used for subsequent experiments.

2.9. Chondroitinase Digestion of Decorin

Skin lysate obtained from Chst14+/+ and Chst14−/− mice were digested with chondroitinase ABC (Seikagaku Co.) or chondroitinase B (IBEX Pharmaceuticals). The digested and undigested lysates were subjected to immunoblotting to detect decorin.

2.10. Decorin-Mediated Fibrillar Organization of Type I Collagen Gels

Isolated decorin was quantified by a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the anti-decorin antibodies. Decorin was incubated with bovine type I collagen acidic solution (collagen:decorin = 500:1 (w/w)) for 2 h in a neutral solution. The resultant collagen gels were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy as described.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± SE. An unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare results from two groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer’s test was used for multiple-comparison test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Details of statistical analyses, including the statistical tests used and p values, may be found in the relevant figures and figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 Patients on Contraction, Fibrillar Organization, and Mechanics of Type I Collagen Gels

We used dermal fibroblast derived from two patients with mcEDS-CHST14 whose pathology was reported in a previous study [7]. Similarly to patient 3, whose GAGs were previously analyzed [7], the cultured medium of fibroblast from patient 6 contained CS but not DS (Supplemental Figure S1, Supplemental Table S1). We then examined the effects of fibroblasts from patients with mcEDS-CHST14 on the collagen gel contraction in vitro. Culturing control fibroblasts in a free-floating collagen gel resulted in a contraction of the gel in a time-dependent manner (Figure 1a,b). By measuring the diameter of the gel at different time points, we found that contraction of the collagen gel mainly occurred within the first 6 h under our experimental conditions. No gel shrinkage was observed in the absence of fibroblasts. The collagen gels cultured with two patient-derived fibroblasts showed significantly larger gel diameters and delayed contraction than that with the healthy control at 1 and 3 h (Figure 1a,b). After 24 h, the diameters of the gels were comparable regardless of the origin of the fibroblasts, suggesting that patient-derived fibroblasts delayed the progression of the initial phase of collagen gel contraction.
We observed fibrillar organization in the collagen gel by transmission electron microscopy analysis (Figure 2a). The assembly of collagen fibrils was evaluated by counting fibrils attached to other fibrils in the transverse sections. Three days after culturing with control fibroblasts, multiple fibrils were assembled to form collagen fibers (Figure 2a). In contrast, the assembly of fibrils was less frequent when cultured with patients-derived fibroblasts. The percentage of assembled fibrils in the total fibrils was 68.2% (n = 36 fibrils) in the control gel, and it was 38.9% and 50.0% in the two patient-mimicking gels, respectively (n = 36 and 16 fibrils for patient 3 and 6, respectively). The fibrillar organization of the gels was further examined using scanning electron microscopy (Figure 2b). The diameter size of fibrils was significantly increased by co-culturing with fibroblasts (Figure 2c). Although there is no apparent difference in the mean diameter of fibrils between control and patient-mimicking, the diameter size distribution of fibril was different between two groups. The diameter of fibrils in the control gels appeared more homogeneous than those in patient-mimicking gels (Figure 2d). These results suggest that patient-derived fibroblasts disturbed fibrillar organization of the collagen gels in vitro.
We investigated mechanical properties of the collagen gels by measuring the breaking strength using a creep meter. The stress–strain curves of the collagen gels indicated that the breaking strength of the collagen gel was markedly increased in the presence of control and patient-derived fibroblasts compared with fibroblast-free gels (Figure 3a). We found that the patient-mimicking gels reached the failure points at a lower stress than the control gels. Consistently, the patient-mimicking gels showed significantly lower maximum stress than the control gels (Figure 3b). These data indicated that the impaired fibrillar organization in patient-mimicking gels resulted in weaker mechanical strength of the gels than the control gels.

3.2. Effect of Decorin Isolated from Normal or Patient’s Fibroblasts on Type I Collagen Gel Properties

Various factors are involved in the fibroblast-mediated collagen gel contraction, making it challenging to identify the molecules that regulate the collagen fibrillar organization. We sought to examine whether the disturbed collagen network in the gels co-cultured with patient-derived fibroblasts was due to abnormalities in decorin. To this end, we isolated decorin from the cultured medium of control and the patient’s fibroblasts and investigated its effects on collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro. Anion exchange chromatography followed by immunoblot analysis indicated that decorin was highly enriched in the 0.5 M NaCl elution fraction (Figure 4a). The apparent molecular weight of decorin was undistinguishable between normal and patient fibroblasts.
Type I collagen was incubated with or without decorin (collagen:decorin = 500:1 (w/w)) for 2 h in a neutral solution, and the resultant collagen gels were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 4b and Supplemental Figure S2). In the absence of decorin, the majority of collagen fiber was composed of two or three fibrils. Thicker collagen fibers were formed in the presence of decorin derived from normal fibroblasts, confirming the instructive roles of decorin in collagen fibrillar organization. Observation at higher magnification visualized GAG chains of decorin attached to collagen fibrils (Figure 4c and Supplemental Figure S2). GAG chains of control decorin were evenly spaced and vertically oriented on the collagen fibers. In contrast, GAG chains of patient-derived decorin were misoriented and did not tightly attach to collagen fibrils. The diameter of collagen fibers was significantly smaller in the collagen gels incubated with patient-derived decorin than normal decorin (Figure 4d). We also found that the diameter of each fibril was smaller when incubated with patient-derived decorin compared to the control (Figure 4e). The diameter of fibrils was more variable in the collagen gel incubated with patient-derived decorin than with controls (Figure 4f). These results directly demonstrated an impaired function of patient-derived decorin in fibrillar organization of type I collagen.

3.3. Effect of Fibroblasts and Decorin Derived from Chst14-Deficient Mice on the Fibrillar Organization of Type I Collagen Gels

A mcEDS-CHST14 model mouse lacking functional CHST14 protein has been established recently. We examined the effect of fibroblasts from Chst14-deficient mice on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels in vitro. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed the assembly of collagen fibers composed of multiple fibrils (Figure 5a,b and Supplemental Figure S3). The diameter of fibrils was markedly increased by co-culturing with fibroblasts compared with the cell-free condition (Figure 5a,b). We found that the diameter of fibrils was smaller in the collagen gels cultured with fibroblasts derived from Chst14−/− mice compared to those from Chst14+/+ and Chst14+/− mice (Figure 5c). Higher magnification views indicated that GAG chains were not tightly aligned on fibrils in Chst14-deficient condition (Figure 5b).
We digested the skin lysate with two chondroitinases to investigate GAG modification on decorin. Chondroitinase ABC degrades both DS and CS chains, whereas chondroitinase B acts only on DS. Decorin from Chst14+/+ mice was shifted to lower molecular weight after digestion with chondroitinase ABC and chondroitinase B (Figure 6a). In contrast, decorin from Chst14−/− mice was partially resistant to chondroitinase B but was digested by chondroitinase ABC. This result indicated that DS chains on decorin were markedly reduced and replaced by CS chains in Chst14−/− mice, as previously reported in patients with mcEDS-CHST14 [7]. We isolated decorin from cultured media of mouse fibroblast using anion exchange chromatography (Figure 6b) and examined its effect on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels. Again, we found that the collagen gels incubated with decorin isolated from two Chst14−/− mice had significantly smaller fibril diameters compared to decorin from Chst14+/+ and Chst14+/− mice (Figure 6c,d). These results indicate that fibroblast- and decorin-mediated fibrillar organization of collagen are impaired by functional loss of CHST14 in both humans and mice.

4. Discussion

Previous electron microscopic analyses have shown that collagen fibrils in patients with mcEDS-CHST14 are dispersed in the reticular dermis, in contrast to the regularly and tightly assembled fibrils observed in healthy individuals [7,16]. In addition, patients show small-sized collagen bundles comprising collagen fibrils with variable diameters separated by irregular interfibrillar spaces [8]. In the present study, we established in vitro models of fibroblast-mediated collagen network formation that recapacitate mcEDS-CHST14 pathology. Electron microscopic analysis revealed impaired fibrillar organization in mcEDS-CHST14-mimicking gels, similar to the abnormal collagen network observed in patients with mcEDS-CHST14.
There are two forms of mcEDS resulting from loss-of-function mutations in CHST14 or DSE [2,3,4]. Both forms of mcEDS shares the primary diagnostic criteria, including multiple congenital contractures, characteristic craniofacial features, and characteristic cutaneous features. However, core skin features and joint manifestations are significantly less common in patients with mcEDS-DSE than in patients with mcEDS-CHST14 [10]. In mice, Dse-deficient fibrils have a larger diameter than wild-type fibrils, while Chst14-deficient fibrils do not show such an increase [26]. These studies suggest that CHST14 and DSE deficiency have different impacts on the pathogenesis of mcEDS. Our in vitro collagen network formation may be useful for analyzing not only mcEDS-DSE but also other EDS pathologies.
Using decorin isolated from cultured skin fibroblasts of patients and Chst14−/− mice, we indicated that decorin is responsible for pathological collagen fibrinogenesis. The decorin preparation used in this study may contain proteoglycans other than decorin. However, since decorin is the major carrier protein of DS chains in the dermis, the impaired collagen fibrillar organization in the mcEDS-CHST14-mimicking gels may be due to the abnormal glycosylation of decorin. Further studies using recombinantly expressed decorin may clarify the exact contribution of decorin in mcEDS.
Decorin, a member of small leucine-rich proteoglycans, localizes to the surfaces of collagen fibrils and plays pivotal functions in fibrillogenesis [19,27]. A central domain of decorin is composed of ten leucine-rich repeats flanked by two cysteine-rich regions at the amino- and carboxyl-terminus. The arch-shaped structure of decorin allows interaction with the triple helix of type I collagen molecule [27]. Amino acid sequences located between the fourth and sixth leucine-rich repeats mediate the interaction with collagen [28,29]. Decorin-deficient mice display aberrant organization of collagen fibrils and fragile skin with decreased strength and stiffness [30,31]. The fibril diameter in decorin-deficient mice is more heterogeneous than that in controls, similarly to what was observed in our mcEDS-CHST14 models. Furthermore, an in vitro study also shows that the inclusion of decorin during collagen fibrillogenesis increases the elasticity and tensile strength of resulting collagen gels [32]. These reports are consistent with our conclusion that the abnormal collagen network in the mcEDS-CHST14 models is due to a functional defect of decorin.
The amino-terminal domain of decorin contains a single DS chain. Since the protein core of decorin mainly mediates the interaction with collagen, it is not fully understood how the loss of DS chain affects collagen fibrinogenesis. However, emerging evidence has indicated a link between DS chains on decorin and the collagen network. In the shape module model, the protein core of decorin is associated with collagen fibrils, while DS chains interact with each other and form antiparallel duplexes that bridge adjacent collagen fibrils [33,34,35]. On the other hand, several lines of study have indicated that DS chains associate with collagen fibrils by electrostatic interaction but not from the antiparallel duplexes [36,37]. These two models are not mutually exclusive, and a recently proposed ring mesh model may explain the apparent discrepancy. In this model, multiple DS chains of decorin interact with each other around collagen fibrils and form a ring mesh-like structure [16,17,38]. Each ring surrounds a collagen fibril at its D-band and fuses with adjacent rings to create a planar network. In any case, DS chains on decorin affect the interfibrillar distance between the collagen fibrils and the overall structure of the collagen network.
The DS chains on decorin are replaced with a CS chain in the mcEDS-CHST14 patient [7,16]. We also confirmed the replacement of GAG chains on decorin in Chst14-deficient mice. DS chains show unique conformational flexibility because IdoA residues are in an equilibrium of 1C4, 2S0, and 4C1 conformations. In contrast, the structure of CS chains is rigid due to the fixed 4C1 conformation of GlcA in CS chains [39]. Therefore, the replacement from DS to CS chains may reduce the flexibility of the GAG chains on decorin and destabilize the GAG-antiparallel duplex. Recent studies have revealed that DS chains on decorin display a curved shape and tightly adhere to the outer surface of collagen fibrils [16,17]. In CHST14-deficient humans and mice, CS chains on decorin linearly extend from collagen fibrils resulting in a disrupted ring mesh-like surrounding collagen fibrils and spatial disorganization of collagen networks. The present study also demonstrates that the alternation of GAG chains on decorin from DS to CS chains causes impaired collagen fibrinogenesis using in vitro reconstitution models.
It has been reported that the initial interaction between fibroblasts and collagen leads to rearrangement and increased density of the collagen fibrils [20,40]. Collagen gel contraction provides an in vitro model for wound healing, fibrosis, scar contraction, and connective tissue morphogenesis. We found a delayed gel contraction in mcEDS-CHST14 models suggesting that DS supports the initial phase of collagen gel contraction. DS impacts cell proliferation, migration, and tissue morphogenesis through interactions with secreted molecules such as fibroblast growth factors and hepatocyte growth factors [13,41,42,43,44]. A disturbed pleiotropic function of DS in mcEDS-CHST14 models may result in delayed gel contraction during the early phase of collagen network remodeling.
In conclusion, this study established in vitro collagen network formation models of mcEDS-CHST14 and revealed that the alternation of GAG chains on decorin from DS to CS chains leads to abnormal collagen assembly. This study may provide useful in vitro models of mcEDS-CHST14 to elucidate the pathomechanism of this disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14020308/s1, Figure S1: HPLC profiles of the digests of the conditioned medium from skin fibroblasts cultures with chondroitinase AC or B. Figure S2: The magnified images of Figure 4b,c. Figure S3: The magnified images of Figure 5b. Table S1: Disaccharide composition of CS and DS in the conditioned medium of skin fibroblast cultures from an mcEDS-CHST14 patient.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.N.; methodology, A.H., T.H., K.H., S.M. (Shuji Mizumoto), Y.N.-K., S.S., T.Y. and S.M. (Shinji Miyata); validation, A.H., S.M. (Shinji Miyata) and Y.N.; formal analysis, A.H.; investigation, A.H.; resources, T.H., S.M. (Shuji Mizumoto), Y.N.-K., T.Y., T.O., T.K. and Y.N.; data curation, A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. (Shinji Miyata); writing—review and editing, T.H., S.M. (Shuji Mizumoto), S.M. (Shinji Miyata) and Y.N.; visualization, A.H. and S.M. (Shinji Miyata); supervision, T.O., S.Y., T.W., T.K. and Y.N.; funding acquisition, T.K. and Y.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology, Japan [grant number 19H03616 to T.K., and 22K05508 to Y.N.], and was supported in part by Grant-in Aid for Research Center for Pathogenesis of Intractable Diseases from the Research Institute of Meijo University (S.M. and S.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shinshu University School of Medicine. The animal study protocol was approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee at Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Nippon Medical School, and Shinshu University.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steinmann, B.; Royce, P.M.; Superti-Furga, A. The Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. In Connective Tissue and Its Heritable Disorders; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 431–523. ISBN 978-0-471-22192-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brady, A.F.; Demirdas, S.; Fournel-Gigleux, S.; Ghali, N.; Giunta, C.; Kapferer-Seebacher, I.; Kosho, T.; Mendoza-Londono, R.; Pope, M.F.; Rohrbach, M.; et al. The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017, 175, 70–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malfait, F.; Francomano, C.; Byers, P.; Belmont, J.; Berglund, B.; Black, J.; Bloom, L.; Bowen, J.M.; Brady, A.F.; Burrows, N.P.; et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017, 175, 8–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Malfait, F.; Castori, M.; Francomano, C.A.; Giunta, C.; Kosho, T.; Byers, P.H. The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mao, J.-R.; Bristow, J. The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: On beyond collagens. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kosho, T.; Miyake, N.; Hatamochi, A.; Takahashi, J.; Kato, H.; Miyahara, T.; Igawa, Y.; Yasui, H.; Ishida, T.; Ono, K.; et al. A new Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with craniofacial characteristics, multiple congenital contractures, progressive joint and skin laxity, and multisystem fragility-related manifestations. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152A, 1333–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miyake, N.; Kosho, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Furuichi, T.; Hatamochi, A.; Nagashima, Y.; Arai, E.; Takahashi, K.; Kawamura, R.; Wakui, K.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations of CHST14 in a new type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Malfait, F.; Syx, D.; Vlummens, P.; Symoens, S.; Nampoothiri, S.; Hermanns-Lê, T.; Van Laer, L.; De Paepe, A. Musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (former EDS type VIB) and adducted thumb clubfoot syndrome (ATCS) represent a single clinical entity caused by mutations in the dermatan-4-sulfotransferase 1 encoding CHST14 gene. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dündar, M.; Müller, T.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, J.; Steinmann, B.; Vodopiutz, J.; Gruber, R.; Sonoda, T.; Krabichler, B.; Utermann, G.; et al. Loss of Dermatan-4-Sulfotransferase 1 Function Results in Adducted Thumb-Clubfoot Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Minatogawa, M.; Unzaki, A.; Morisaki, H.; Syx, D.; Sonoda, T.; Janecke, A.R.; Slavotinek, A.; Voermans, N.C.; Lacassie, Y.; Mendoza-Londono, R.; et al. Clinical and molecular features of 66 patients with musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in CHST14 (mcEDS-CHST14). J. Med. Genet. 2022, 59, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mikami, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Kago, N.; Kitagawa, H.; Sugahara, K. Specificities of Three Distinct Human Chondroitin/Dermatan N-Acetylgalactosamine 4-O-Sulfotransferases Demonstrated Using Partially Desulfated Dermatan Sulfate as an Acceptor: IMPLICATION OF DIFFERENTIAL ROLES IN DERMATAN SULFATE BIOSYNTHESIS*. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36115–36127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Evers, M.R.; Xia, G.; Kang, H.-G.; Schachner, M.; Baenziger, J.U. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Dermatan-Specific N-Acetylgalactosamine 4-O-Sulfotransferase*. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 36344–36353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mizumoto, S.; Yamada, S. The Specific Role of Dermatan Sulfate as an Instructive Glycosaminoglycan in Tissue Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thelin, M.A.; Bartolini, B.; Axelsson, J.; Gustafsson, R.; Tykesson, E.; Pera, E.; Oldberg, Å.; Maccarana, M.; Malmstrom, A. Biological functions of iduronic acid in chondroitin/dermatan sulfate. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 2431–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tykesson, E.; Hassinen, A.; Zielinska, K.; Thelin, M.A.; Frati, G.; Ellervik, U.; Westergren-Thorsson, G.; Malmström, A.; Kellokumpu, S.; Maccarana, M. Dermatan sulfate epimerase 1 and dermatan 4-O-sulfotransferase 1 form complexes that generate long epimerized 4-O-sulfated blocks. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 13725–13735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hirose, T.; Takahashi, N.; Tangkawattana, P.; Minaguchi, J.; Mizumoto, S.; Yamada, S.; Miyake, N.; Hayashi, S.; Hatamochi, A.; Nakayama, J.; et al. Structural alteration of glycosaminoglycan side chains and spatial disorganization of collagen networks in the skin of patients with mcEDS-CHST14. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hirose, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Hashimoto, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Yoshizawa, T.; Nitahara-Kasahara, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Nakayama, J.; Takehana, K.; Okada, T.; et al. Systematic investigation of the skin in Chst14−/− mice: A model for skin fragility in musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos syndrome caused by CHST14 variants (mcEDS-CHST14). Glycobiology 2021, 31, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Syx, D.; Van Damme, T.; Symoens, S.; Maiburg, M.C.; van de Laar, I.; Morton, J.; Suri, M.; Del Campo, M.; Hausser, I.; Hermanns-Lê, T.; et al. Genetic Heterogeneity and Clinical Variability in Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome Caused by Impaired Dermatan Sulfate Biosynthesis. Hum. Mutat. 2015, 36, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reed, C.C.; Iozzo, R.V. The role of decorin in collagen fibrillogenesis and skin homeostasis. Glycoconj. J. 2002, 19, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bell, E.; Ivarsson, B.; Merrill, C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tomasek, J.J.; Akiyama, S.K. Fibroblast-mediated collagen gel contraction does not require fibronectin-α 5 β 1 integrin interaction. Anat. Rec. 1992, 234, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nishiyama, T.; Tominaga, N.; Nakajima, K.; Hayashi, T. Quantitative Evaluation of the Factors Affecting the Process of Fibroblast-Mediated Collagen Gel Contraction by Separating the Process into Three Phases. Coll. Relat. Res. 1988, 8, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nitahara-Kasahara, Y.; Mizumoto, S.; Inoue, Y.U.; Saka, S.; Posadas-Herrera, G.; Nakamura-Takahashi, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Hashimoto, A.; Konishi, K.; Miyata, S.; et al. A new mouse model of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome generated using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genomic editing. Dis. Models Mech. 2021, 14, dmm048963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yoshizawa, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Shimada, S.; Sugahara, K.; Nakayama, J.; Takeda, S.; Nomura, Y.; Nitahara-Kasahara, Y.; Okada, T.; et al. Vascular abnormalities in the placenta of Chst14−/− fetuses: Implications in the pathophysiology of perinatal lethality of the murine model and vascular lesions in human CHST14/D4ST1 deficiency. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nomura, Y.; Toki, S.; Ishii, Y.; Shirai, K. The Physicochemical Property of Shark Type I Collagen Gel and Membrane. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2028–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maccarana, M.; Kalamajski, S.; Kongsgaard, M.; Magnusson, S.P.; Oldberg, A.; Malmström, A. Dermatan sulfate epimerase 1-deficient mice have reduced content and changed distribution of iduronic acids in dermatan sulfate and an altered collagen structure in skin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 5517–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iozzo, R.V. The Biology of the Small Leucine-rich Proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 18843–18846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Svensson, L.; Heineg, D.; Oldberg. Decorin-binding Sites for Collagen Type I Are Mainly Located in Leucine-rich Repeats 4-5 (∗). J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 20712–20716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schönherr, E.; Hausser, H.; Beavan, L.; Kresse, H. Decorin-type I collagen interaction. Presence of separate core protein-binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 8877–8883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Danielson, K.G.; Baribault, H.; Holmes, D.F.; Graham, H.; Kadler, K.E.; Iozzo, R.V. Targeted Disruption of Decorin Leads to Abnormal Collagen Fibril Morphology and Skin Fragility. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 136, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, G.; Ezura, Y.; Chervoneva, I.; Robinson, P.S.; Beason, D.P.; Carine, E.T.; Soslowsky, L.J.; Iozzo, R.V.; Birk, D.E. Decorin regulates assembly of collagen fibrils and acquisition of biomechanical properties during tendon development. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006, 98, 1436–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reese, S.P.; Underwood, C.J.; Weiss, J.A. Effects of decorin proteoglycan on fibrillogenesis, ultrastructure, and mechanics of type I collagen gels. Matrix Biol. 2013, 32, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scott, J.E. Proteoglycan-fibrillar collagen interactions. Biochem. J. 1988, 252, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scott, J.E. Elasticity in extracellular matrix ‘shape modules’ of tendon, cartilage, etc. A sliding proteoglycan-filament model. J. Physiol. 2003, 553, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lewis, P.N.; Pinali, C.; Young, R.D.; Meek, K.M.; Quantock, A.J.; Knupp, C. Structural Interactions between Collagen and Proteoglycans Are Elucidated by Three-Dimensional Electron Tomography of Bovine Cornea. Structure 2010, 18, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nomura, Y. Structural Change in Decorin with Skin Aging. Connect. Tissue Res. 2006, 47, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Raspanti, M.; Viola, M.; Forlino, A.; Tenni, R.; Gruppi, C.; Tira, M.E. Glycosaminoglycans show a specific periodic interaction with type I collagen fibrils. J. Struct. Biol. 2008, 164, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Watanabe, T.; Kametani, K.; Koyama, Y.; Suzuki, D.; Imamura, Y.; Takehana, K.; Hiramatsu, K. Ring-Mesh Model of Proteoglycan Glycosaminoglycan Chains in Tendon Based on Three-dimensional Reconstruction by Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 23704–23708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Casu, B.; Petitou, M.; Provasoli, M.; Sinaÿ, P. Conformational flexibility: A new concept for explaining binding and biological properties of iduronic acid-containing glycosaminoglycans. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1988, 13, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guidry, C.; Grinnell, F. Studies on the mechanism of hydrated collagen gel reorganization by human skin fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1985, 79, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Penc, S.F.; Pomahac, B.; Winkler, T.; Dorschner, R.A.; Eriksson, E.; Herndon, M.; Gallo, R.L. Dermatan Sulfate Released after Injury Is a Potent Promoter of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Function*. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 28116–28121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Trowbridge, J.M.; Rudisill, J.A.; Ron, D.; Gallo, R.L. Dermatan Sulfate Binds and Potentiates Activity of Keratinocyte Growth Factor (FGF-7)*. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 42815–42820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lyon, M.; Deakin, J.A.; Rahmoune, H.; Fernig, D.G.; Nakamura, T.; Gallagher, J.T. Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor Binds with High Affinity to Dermatan Sulfate*. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Villena, J.; Brandan, E. Dermatan sulfate exerts an enhanced growth factor response on skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and migration. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004, 198, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 00308 g001
Figure 1. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the contraction of type I collagen gels in vitro. (a) Fibroblasts derived from control and two patients were embedded in collagen gels and imaged at indicated time points. No contraction was observed in the absence of cells (Cell-free). (b) Diameter of the collagen gels. Different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) from each other in all combinations based on multiple comparisons (Tukey–Kramer’s test). n = 3 for each group. Mean ± SE.
Figure 1. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the contraction of type I collagen gels in vitro. (a) Fibroblasts derived from control and two patients were embedded in collagen gels and imaged at indicated time points. No contraction was observed in the absence of cells (Cell-free). (b) Diameter of the collagen gels. Different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) from each other in all combinations based on multiple comparisons (Tukey–Kramer’s test). n = 3 for each group. Mean ± SE.
Genes 14 00308 g001
Genes 14 00308 g002
Figure 2. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels. (a) Transmission electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibrils in the cell-free, control, and patient-mimicking gels. Multiple fibrils are assembled to form collagen fibers in the control gel. (b) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibrils. (c) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for Cell-free, n = 29 for control, n = 23 for patient 3, n = 27 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (d) Histogram showing the distribution of the fibril diameter size. The Black dotted line is the median.
Figure 2. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels. (a) Transmission electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibrils in the cell-free, control, and patient-mimicking gels. Multiple fibrils are assembled to form collagen fibers in the control gel. (b) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibrils. (c) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for Cell-free, n = 29 for control, n = 23 for patient 3, n = 27 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (d) Histogram showing the distribution of the fibril diameter size. The Black dotted line is the median.
Genes 14 00308 g002
Genes 14 00308 g003
Figure 3. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the mechanical strength of type I collagen gels. (a) Representative stress–strain curves of the cell-free, control, and patient-mimicking gels. (b) Bar graph showing the maximum stress of the gels. n = 8 gels for cell-free, n = 6 for control, n = 8 for patient 3, n = 8 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Figure 3. Effect of fibroblasts from mcEDS-CHST14 patients on the mechanical strength of type I collagen gels. (a) Representative stress–strain curves of the cell-free, control, and patient-mimicking gels. (b) Bar graph showing the maximum stress of the gels. n = 8 gels for cell-free, n = 6 for control, n = 8 for patient 3, n = 8 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Genes 14 00308 g003
Genes 14 00308 g004
Figure 4. Effect of decorin isolated from normal or patient’s fibroblasts on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen in vitro. (a) Purification of decorin from cultured medium of control and patient’s fibroblasts. The 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl fraction of anion exchange chromatography was subjected to immunoblotting to detect decorin. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrow indicates unidentified components. (b) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibers incubated with or without decorin. The red two-headed arrow shows collagen fibers composed of multiple fibrils. (c) Observation at higher magnification visualized GAG chains as indicated by the red arrows. (d,e) The diameter of collagen fibers. n = 211 for No-decorin, n = 124 for control, n = 121 for patient 3, n = 70 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. No decorin; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (e) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 for No-decorin, n = 76 for control, n = 72 for patient 3, n = 74 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01 vs. No decorin; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (f) Histogram showing the distribution of the fibril diameter size. The Black dotted line is the median.
Figure 4. Effect of decorin isolated from normal or patient’s fibroblasts on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen in vitro. (a) Purification of decorin from cultured medium of control and patient’s fibroblasts. The 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl fraction of anion exchange chromatography was subjected to immunoblotting to detect decorin. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrow indicates unidentified components. (b) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibers incubated with or without decorin. The red two-headed arrow shows collagen fibers composed of multiple fibrils. (c) Observation at higher magnification visualized GAG chains as indicated by the red arrows. (d,e) The diameter of collagen fibers. n = 211 for No-decorin, n = 124 for control, n = 121 for patient 3, n = 70 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. No decorin; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (e) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 for No-decorin, n = 76 for control, n = 72 for patient 3, n = 74 for patient 6. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01 vs. No decorin; Tukey–Kramer’s test. (f) Histogram showing the distribution of the fibril diameter size. The Black dotted line is the median.
Genes 14 00308 g004
Genes 14 00308 g005
Figure 5. Effect of fibroblasts from Chst14-deficient mice on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels in vitro. (a) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of fibrils in the collagen gels co-cultured with or without fibroblasts from Chst14+/+, Chst14+/−, and Chst14−/− mice. (b) Observation at higher magnification visualized GAG chains as indicated by the red arrows. (c) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for Cell-free, n = 105 for Chst14+/+, n = 116 for Chst14+/−, n = 108 for Chst14−/−. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. Cell-free; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Figure 5. Effect of fibroblasts from Chst14-deficient mice on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels in vitro. (a) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of fibrils in the collagen gels co-cultured with or without fibroblasts from Chst14+/+, Chst14+/−, and Chst14−/− mice. (b) Observation at higher magnification visualized GAG chains as indicated by the red arrows. (c) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for Cell-free, n = 105 for Chst14+/+, n = 116 for Chst14+/−, n = 108 for Chst14−/−. Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. Cell-free; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Genes 14 00308 g005
Genes 14 00308 g006
Figure 6. Effect of decorin isolated from Chst14−/− mice on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels. (a) Immunoblot analysis of decorin in the skin lysate prepared from Chst14+/+ and Chst14−/− mice after digestion with chondroitinase ABC or chondroitinase B. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrows indicate unidentified components. (b) Purification of decorin from cultured medium of mouse fibroblasts with indicated genotype. The 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl fraction of anion exchange chromatography was subjected to immunoblotting to detect decorin. Two different Chst14−/− mice were used for purification of decorin. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrow indicates unidentified components. P; pig placental decorin. (c) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibers incubated with or without decorin isolated from mouse fibroblast with indicated genotype. (d) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for No-decorin, n = 64 for Chst14+/+, n = 78 for Chst14+/−, n = 86 for Chst14−/−-1, n = 85 for Chst14−/−-2, Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. Cell-free; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Figure 6. Effect of decorin isolated from Chst14−/− mice on the fibrillar organization of type I collagen gels. (a) Immunoblot analysis of decorin in the skin lysate prepared from Chst14+/+ and Chst14−/− mice after digestion with chondroitinase ABC or chondroitinase B. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrows indicate unidentified components. (b) Purification of decorin from cultured medium of mouse fibroblasts with indicated genotype. The 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl fraction of anion exchange chromatography was subjected to immunoblotting to detect decorin. Two different Chst14−/− mice were used for purification of decorin. The bracket indicates the position of decorin. The arrow indicates unidentified components. P; pig placental decorin. (c) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of collagen fibers incubated with or without decorin isolated from mouse fibroblast with indicated genotype. (d) The diameter of collagen fibrils. n = 75 fibrils for No-decorin, n = 64 for Chst14+/+, n = 78 for Chst14+/−, n = 86 for Chst14−/−-1, n = 85 for Chst14−/−-2, Mean ± SE; * p < 0.01; † p < 0.05 vs. Cell-free; Tukey–Kramer’s test.
Genes 14 00308 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hashimoto, A.; Hirose, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Mizumoto, S.; Nitahara-Kasahara, Y.; Saka, S.; Yoshizawa, T.; Okada, T.; Yamada, S.; Kosho, T.; et al. Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome. Genes 2023, 14, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020308

AMA Style

Hashimoto A, Hirose T, Hashimoto K, Mizumoto S, Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Saka S, Yoshizawa T, Okada T, Yamada S, Kosho T, et al. Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome. Genes. 2023; 14(2):308. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020308

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hashimoto, Ayana, Takuya Hirose, Kohei Hashimoto, Shuji Mizumoto, Yuko Nitahara-Kasahara, Shota Saka, Takahiro Yoshizawa, Takashi Okada, Shuhei Yamada, Tomoki Kosho, and et al. 2023. "Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome" Genes 14, no. 2: 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020308

APA Style

Hashimoto, A., Hirose, T., Hashimoto, K., Mizumoto, S., Nitahara-Kasahara, Y., Saka, S., Yoshizawa, T., Okada, T., Yamada, S., Kosho, T., Watanabe, T., Miyata, S., & Nomura, Y. (2023). Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome. Genes, 14(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020308

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop