You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
GenesGenes
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 November 2022

Genetic Variations between Youth and Professional Development Phase English Academy Football Players

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK
2
Department of Sport Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
3
Academy Coaching Department, AFC Bournemouth, Bournemouth BH7 7AF, UK
4
School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Basis of Sports Athletes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in the genotype frequency distribution of thirty-three single nucleotide variants (SNVs) between youth development phase (YDP) and professional development phase (PDP) academy football players. One hundred and sixty-six male football players from two Category 1 and Category 3 English academies were examined within their specific age phase: YDP (n = 92; aged 13.84 ± 1.63 years) and PDP (n = 74; aged 18.09 ± 1.51 years). Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare individual genotype frequencies, whereas unweighted and weighted total genotype scores (TGS; TWGS) were computed to assess differences in polygenic profiles. In isolation, the IL6 (rs1800795) G allele was overrepresented in PDP players (90.5%) compared to YDP players (77.2%; p = 0.023), whereby PDP players had nearly three times the odds of possessing a G allele (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.13–7.09). The TGS (p = 0.001) and TWGS (p < 0.001) were significant, but poor, in distinguishing YDP and PDP players (AUC = 0.643–0.694), with PDP players exhibiting an overall more power-orientated polygenic profile. If validated in larger independent youth football cohorts, these findings may have important implications for future studies examining genetic associations in youth football.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.