You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cells
  • Review
  • Open Access

21 October 2021

Metabolomics in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications: Insights from Epidemiological Studies

and
1
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
2
Laboratory for Molecular Epidemiology in Diabetes, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
4
Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Research Centre in Diabetes Genomics and Precision Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms in Metabolic Disease 2022

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of diabetes and its complications, such as cardiovascular and kidney disease, remains a huge burden globally. Identification of biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of diabetes and its complications and better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the development and progression of diabetes can facilitate individualized prevention and treatment. With the advancement of analytical techniques, metabolomics can identify and quantify multiple biomarkers simultaneously in a high-throughput manner. Providing information on underlying metabolic pathways, metabolomics can further identify mechanisms of diabetes and its progression. The application of metabolomics in epidemiological studies have identified novel biomarkers for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its complications, such as branched-chain amino acids, metabolites of phenylalanine, metabolites involved in energy metabolism, and lipid metabolism. Metabolomics have also been applied to explore the potential pathways modulated by medications. Investigating diabetes using a systems biology approach by integrating metabolomics with other omics data, such as genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and clinical data can present a comprehensive metabolic network and facilitate causal inference. In this regard, metabolomics can deepen the molecular understanding, help identify potential therapeutic targets, and improve the prevention and management of T2D and its complications. The current review focused on metabolomic biomarkers for kidney and cardiovascular disease in T2D identified from epidemiological studies, and will also provide a brief overview on metabolomic investigations for T2D.

1. Introduction

Diabetes affected 463 million people in 2019, and it has been projected that 700 million adults will have diabetes worldwide by 2045, with the majority being type 2 diabetes (T2D) [1]. Diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD); whereby around 40% of individuals with T2D develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD) [2], and DKD has become the major cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), contributing to half of new cases of ESKD each year [3]. Moreover, individuals with T2D have 2- to 4-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death [4]. A multinational study including participants from South and East Asia, North Africa, the Middle East, South America, and Europe reported an approximate 50% prevalence of microvascular complications and 30% prevalence of macrovascular complications in T2D [5]. DKD characterized by impaired glomerular filtration rate or albuminuria has been associated with increased risk of CVD and mortality [6,7]. Furthermore, CVD has been estimated to cause two-thirds of deaths in T2D [8]. Consequently, T2D has been ranked fourth among the disease burden worldwide [9], with a 2- to 3-fold increase in medical expenditures [10].
T2D is believed to arise due to complex interactions between genetic information, developmental exposures and environmental factors such as diet, physical activity, and pollution [11,12]. Hyperglycemia is the hallmark feature of diabetes and has been utilized as a screening and diagnostic biomarker for diabetes, however, metabolic alteration leading to diabetes may be present decades before the onset of hyperglycemia. Modification of lifestyle (diet and physical activity) could delay or even prevent the development of diabetes [13,14], highlighting the utility of powerful screening biomarkers to identify individuals at risk of developing diabetes. Given the increasing risks of adverse outcomes in diabetes and the availability of drugs proven to delay or prevent CVD and DKD [15,16,17], it is also critical to identify prognostic biomarkers involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications or predictive of future diabetic complications, which can facilitate clinicians’ decision making and benefit individuals at risk. Biomarkers indicating clinical response to specific medications can help identify individuals who may benefit from the therapy compared with those who have no biological response.
To improve the prevention and risk stratification of diabetes and its complications, as well as to maximize the benefits from interventions, approaches which provide novel insights into the etiology, diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes are much needed. With the rapid advancements in analytical techniques, it has become possible to identify and quantify multiple biomarkers simultaneously in a high-throughput manner, which has dramatically advanced approaches for biomarker discovery.

2. Metabolomics and Metabolites

In 1971, Linus Pauling and colleagues introduced the concept of using quantitative and qualitative patterns of metabolites to understand the physiological status within a biological system [18]. Metabolites (with a small molecular mass < 1500 Da) can be endogenous compounds that are produced during endogenous catabolism or anabolism, such as amino acids, peptides, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, organic acids, and fatty acids (FAs), as well as exogenous chemicals, such as toxins and xenobiotics. The metabolome is termed as the complete collection of metabolites in a given biosample. Metabolomics is the method of comprehensively characterizing the metabolome in cells, organs, biofluids, or other biological systems. Metabolomics is emerging as an attractive tool for biomarker discovery in diabetes and its complications, since metabolites can provide information on the molecular pathways involved in the development and progression of disease.
Multiple factors contribute to the development of diabetes. Most genetic variants associated with T2D identified in large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) only modestly contribute to the risk of diabetes. Among the identified genetic variants, over 300 common genetic variants collectively explained only 16% of the variance of diabetes in a study which included around one million individuals of European decent [19]. Metabolites are, in general, the downstream products of gene expression, transcripts, protein transporters, and enzymatic reactions, which are closely correlated with genes in which a single deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) base change in a given gene can result in 10,000-fold change in the level of endogenous metabolites [20] (Figure 1). Besides internal variations, metabolites can also be affected by exogenous factors, such as diet, lifestyle, physical activities, gut microbiota, and environmental pollution; thus, the metabolome is believed to reflect the molecular profile most proximal to an individual’s phenotype, since it integrates information from the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and enzymes as well as exogenous exposures (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Metabolomics provide a comprehensive molecular profile of a phenotype by integrating both endogenous and exogenous information. Metabolites are the downstream products of the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and enzymatic reactions, which are also affected by environmental exposures, such as environmental pollution, physical activities, medications, and diet. The metabolome is closely correlated with genes in which even one single base change in a protein-coding gene can result in 10,000-fold change in the level of a metabolite. In contrast to the relatively simple chemical constitutions of genome (4 nucleotide bases) and proteome (20 proteogenic amino acids), the metabolome consists of thousands of different chemical classes and the number of metabolites is estimated to be around 1 million, while the number of genes and proteins are about 20,000 and 620,000, respectively. Thus, metabolomics provides a comprehensive molecular profile of a phenotype.
With the advances of analytical techniques and statistical approaches, the number of measurable metabolites has been increasing exponentially over the past 10 years (from 2200 to around 1 million currently) [21]. The application of metabolomics in diabetes and its complications, especially in large-scale epidemiological studies, has facilitated the identification and validation of metabolites that can serve as screening and prognostic biomarkers. Moreover, a multi-omics approach, combining metabolomics with other “omics” data, can provide insights into the complex intercorrelations of different axes involved in the disease and provide opportunities to elucidate the potential causality between biomarkers and disease. The current review focuses on metabolomic biomarkers for kidney and cardiovascular disease in T2D identified from epidemiological studies, and will also provide a brief overview on metabolomic biomarkers for T2D identified in prospective studies. In the following section, we firstly introduce the analytical methods for metabolic profiling.

3. Analytical Methods

3.1. Untargeted and Targeted Metabolomics

There are two analytical approaches for metabolomics studies: untargeted and targeted. Untargeted metabolomics represents the unbiased approach to complete profiling of the metabolome, aiming to detect, identify, and quantify as many metabolites in a biological sample as possible. The major strength of untargeted metabolomics is the possibility of uncovering novel biomarkers and pathophysiological pathways of disease. However, the annotation of unknown compounds often becomes a challenge, given the wide coverage of signals. In contrast, targeted metabolomics aims to measure a prespecified set or cluster of chemical compounds, which are usually lying on the same metabolic pathways or are structurally similar. Although only capable of providing limited information on the metabolic profiling, targeted metabolomics in general has higher sensitivity and selectivity, and can often provide a deeper understanding of the selected metabolites.

3.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

In sharp contrast to the genome, which comprises of only four nucleotide bases, or the proteome, which represents the different combinations of 20 proteogenic amino acids, the metabolome consists of chemical compounds belonging to thousands of different chemical classes [22] (Figure 1). Given the diverse chemical properties and the wide range of concentrations of metabolites, currently, no single platform can quantify the entire metabolome. The two most commonly used techniques are NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS), with the latter usually coupled to separation techniques, such as gas chromatography (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography (LC-MS). NMR works by the manipulation of the nuclear spin of certain atomic nuclei, such as 1H, 13C, 15N, and 31P, by exposing them to a strong external magnetic field, and then recording the frequency of electromagnetic radiation released as a result of nuclei relaxation. Because the signal of a given nucleus is influenced by the neighboring atoms in a predictable way, the chemical shifts in its resonance frequency can thus be used to identify the underlying molecular structure. Since 1H atoms can be found in most of the organic compounds, proton (1H) NMR spectroscopy (1H NMR) is widely employed in NMR-based metabolomics studies. NMR is noninvasive and nondestructive, and requires little or no sample preparation, chromatographic separation, or chemical derivatization; it can also be applied to in vivo tissues or to living samples, such as the real-time profiling of living cells and analysis of real-time metabolic flux [23,24]. Another advantage of NMR is that NMR is especially suitable for assessing protein-bound metabolites (i.e., lipoprotein particles), and given the high automatability and reproducibility, NMR can be applied in large-scale metabolomics studies [25,26]. The major limitation of NMR, however, is its relatively low sensitivity (millimole to micromole per liter range), which is approximately 10 to 100 times less sensitive than MS.

3.3. Mass Spectrometry

The high resolution and sensitivity of MS has made it the most widely used platform for metabolomic studies [27]. Compounds are first separated by chromatographic techniques (i.e., GC or LC) to reduce ion suppression, before quantification and identification by the mass spectrometer. GC-MS is a highly sensitive and suitable method for the separation of volatile and thermally stable metabolites. GC-MS can separate naturally volatile compounds, such as ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, esters, and furans, and compounds that can be made volatile by derivatization, such as sugars, amino acids, lipids, and organic acids [28]. As chemical derivatization may alter the structure of compounds and unpredictable variations may occur during sample preparation, one of the drawbacks of GC-MS is its relatively low reproducibility [29]. Compared with GC-MS, LC-MS requires higher instrument costs, and suffers from lower reproducibility. LC-MS can separate a wide range of classes of compounds, from very polar to very nonpolar ones [30]. As compounds in biofluids must be ionized prior to MS measurement, unlike GC-MS which utilizes the hard-ionization approach (i.e., electron-impact [EI] ionization), LC-MS often uses soft-ionization methods instead (i.e., electrospray ionization [ESI] and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization [APCI]), thus generating ions without fragmentation and allowing the identification of unknown compounds [31,32]. Compared to GC-MS, one of the advantages of LC-MS is that chemical derivatization is not required in most conditions since high temperatures and volatility are no longer required. Moreover, LC-MS is in general more sensitive, covering compounds from low molecular weight to molecular weights beyond 600 Da, including phospholipids, conjugated bile acids, glycosides and sugars [33]. However, the major drawback of LC-MS as an untargeted platform is the lack of transferable mass spectral libraries [34]. Compared with NMR, although MS techniques have higher sensitivity, they are destructive and in general produce results which are comparatively less reproducible. The major advantages and disadvantages of NMR and MS techniques for metabolomic profiling are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of different platforms for metabolomics studies.

4. Metabolomics in Diabetes

The characteristic perturbations of metabolic homeostasis associated with or preceding the development of hyperglycemia makes metabolomics a good method to elucidate the potential pathways and to explore potential biomarkers for T2D. Over the past two decades, metabolomics has been widely utilized in large epidemiological studies, and some metabolites/pathways have been identified and validated to be associated with insulin metabolism or being predictive of diabetes across different studies [35]. Table 2 summarizes the findings from some of key prospective studies [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66].
Table 2. Circulating metabolites associated with type 2 diabetes in prospective epidemiological studies.

4.1. Amino Acids

4.1.1. Branched-Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs)

BCAAs (isoleucine, leucine, and valine) have been found to be altered among obese vs. lean humans, and were found to contribute to insulin resistance in experimental studies [67]. First reported in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and subsequently replicated in the Malmö Diet and Cancer study [38], BCAAs and two aromatic amino acids (AAAs, tyrosine and phenylalanine) were found to be associated with increased risk of T2D during a 12-year follow-up, and the associations remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, body-mass index (BMI), and fasting glucose [38]. The combination of three amino acids (isoleucine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine) could predict T2D (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66–3.54). Furthermore, compared to individuals from the lowest quartile, people in the highest quartile had an odds ratio of 5.99 (95% CI, 2.34–15.34) for diabetes [38]. Multiple studies across different ethnicities have since replicated the association between BCAAs and risk of diabetes [39,45,47,51,52,53,54,57,59,60]. BCAAs have been found to be related to insulin resistance in animal and human studies [68], however, it remains unclear whether BCAAs contribute to diabetes in a causal manner. Residual confounding and reverse causation in observational studies often hamper the causal inference between biomarkers and outcomes. Using genetic variants mimicking the life-time effects of an environmental exposure which are fixed at conception as the instrumental variable, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have been utilized to explore the potential causal link between exposures and outcomes. One MR study found that a GRS (genetic risk score) for insulin resistance causally increased BCAAs levels, while genetically increased BCAAs were not associated with insulin resistance [69]. Another two-sample MR study further supported a causal link between insulin resistance and BCAAs [70]. Despite lacking a direct causal link with diabetes, these results suggest that BCAAs may lie on the causal pathway from insulin resistance to diabetes by mediating the effect of insulin resistance on the development of diabetes, since BCAAs levels have been found to be increased by obese microbiomes, and there is decreased oxidation in the adipose tissue and liver in people with insulin resistance [71] (Figure 2). BCAAs may therefore serve as predictive biomarkers, especially given their levels may be increased as early as a decade before overt diabetes.
Figure 2. The role of BCAAs in the progression from insulin resistance to type 2 diabetes. In mendelian randomization studies, genetically predicted insulin resistance increased BCAAs, rather than the reverse. BCAAs oxidation in adipose tissue and liver was decreased in people with insulin resistance, leading to elevated circulating BCAAs. Obese microbiomes could elevate BCAAs. One of the BCAAs, leucine, could activate the mTOR pathway. The above findings suggest a potential mediating role of BCAAs in the progression from insulin resistance to type 2 diabetes. Increased BCAAs oxidation in skeletal muscle depletes the intracellular pool of glycine and increases 3-hydroxyisobutyrate production, resulting in skeletal muscle lipotoxicity, which may be the mechanism linking BCAAs and insulin resistance. BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; MR, mendelian randomization; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin.

4.1.2. Aromatic Amino Acids

Tyrosine and phenylalanine, two kinds of AAAs, have also been associated with risk of diabetes [38,39,45,47,49,54,56,59,60]. Analyses in individuals with normal fasting glucose from the FHS found a positive association between phenylalanine and future diabetes, and the consistent findings in MR studies further supported a potential causal role of phenylalanine in the pathogenesis of diabetes [58]. A breakdown product of phenylalanine, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) lactate, has been found to be associated with decreased insulin secretion and diabetes in the Metabolic Syndrome in Men (METSIM) study [63]. Results from the Southall Additionally, Brent Revisited (SABRE) study suggested a stronger association of tyrosine with diabetes in South Asians than in Europeans, indicating that the metabolic profile may differ between different ethnicities, and that metabolites may be helpful towards exploring ethnic differences in diabetes incidence. Tyrosine may be an ideal predictive biomarker for diabetes in South Asians [45].

4.1.3. Other Amino Acids

Glycine, a nonessential amino acid [72], was found to be inversely associated with diabetes in Europeans [40,42,47,58], whereas a positive association has been reported in a Chinese population [51]. The MR analysis from the FHS suggested a potential causal link between glycine and diabetes, with the genetically predicted glycine being inversely associated with risk of diabetes [58]. However, a study including 74,124 T2D cases and 824,006 controls did not find an association between genetically predicted glycine and diabetes risk [73]. Furthermore, the study found that genetically higher insulin resistance was associated with lower levels of glycine, suggesting a mediating role of glycine between insulin resistance and diabetes [73]. Alanine, a nonessential amino acid synthesized from pyruvate and BCAAs, has also been reported to be associated with diabetes [39,47,49,54,56]. Glutamate, synthesized from α-ketoglutaric acid in the citric acid cycle, has been found to be associated with the risk of diabetes [47,52,60] and a reverse association of glutamine, a transamination product of glutamate, has been reported [39,52]. The biological roles of these amino acids in the development of diabetes are, however, yet to be elucidated.

4.2. Organic Acids

Alpha-hydroxybutyrate, a product of threonine and methionine, upstream of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, has been associated with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes [41,50,52,53,63]. Ketone bodies are an important alternative energy source during fasting, and levels of ketone bodies represent the balance of production (ketogenesis) and utilization (ketolysis). Acetoacetate, converted from free fatty acids (FFAs), has been associated with impaired insulin secretion and diabetes [43].

4.3. Lipids

4.3.1. Lipoproteins

Individuals with T2D commonly exhibit dyslipidemia, namely, high levels of triglycerides and small dense LDL particles, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and normal or near-normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels [74]. NMR has emerged as a novel method to measure lipoprotein particles [75], and has been applied in investigations on lipoproteins and onset of diabetes. In the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) size and small HDL were associated with increased risk of diabetes, independent of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol in prediabetic subjects [36]. In the Women’s Health Study (WHS), both lipoprotein particle size and concentration have been associated with incident diabetes during 13-year follow-up; VLDL size, total/large/small VLDL concentration, and small LDL and HDL were positively associated with diabetes, while large LDL and HDL were inversely associated [37]. Analyses from Finnish populations have also found a positive association for VLDL and a negative association for HDL [46,59]. Recent analyses from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease (PREVEND) study with detailed HDL subspecies measurements reported heterogeneous associations between HDL subclasses and incident diabetes: larger HDL size and particles were associated with lower risk of incident diabetes [66].

4.3.2. Fatty Acids

FFAs are produced during hydrolysis of triglycerides [76]. Under the insulin-resistant state, increased lipolysis leads to overproduction of FFAs. In the METSIM study, saturated FAs were associated with increased risk of diabetes, while an inverse association has been found between unsaturated FAs and diabetes [44]. Furthermore, monounsaturated FAs (MUFAs%) were associated with risk of diabetes in a prospective study combining four Finnish cohorts over 8–15 years of follow-up, and polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs%), mainly n-6 FAs, were associated with decreased risk of diabetes [59]. A two-sample MR study suggested potential causal associations between FAs and fasting glucose, beta cell function, and diabetes [77]. Genetically predicted linoleic acid, the main n-6 PUFAs, has been consistently associated with lower risk of diabetes in a two-sample MR using different genetic variants and analytical approaches [78]. FAs can be derived from dietary triglycerides and phospholipids and dietary counselling has been shown to modify circulating FAs levels [79]. With possible causal links with diabetes, FAs may be emerging as new intervention targets for the prevention of diabetes.

5. Metabolomics in Diabetic Kidney Disease

The kidneys are metabolically active organs involved in modulating the circulating levels of metabolites through filtration, reabsorption, secretion, and metabolism (including catabolism and anabolism). Consequently, changes in metabolite concentrations may reflect kidney function, and these changes may even precede the onset or progression of kidney disease, hence providing insights into the development and progression of DKD. Creatinine is one of the commonly applied metabolites that is freely filtered at the glomerulus, and not reabsorbed, with only limited secretion by tubules [80]. Serum creatinine can be used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) noninvasively, however, creatinine is significantly increased at more advanced stages of CKD (CKD stage three and onward) and is affected by age, sex, race, and muscle mass. The identification of early markers is warranted given the availability of treatments which can prevent and delay DKD progression. Metabolomic studies have been applied to investigate blood or urine metabolomic biomarkers for DKD and have provided novel insights into the mechanisms leading to DKD and its progression, which make potential therapeutic targets possible. Table 3 summarized metabolomic investigations in DKD [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107].
Table 3. Circulating metabolites associated with diabetic kidney disease in human studies.

5.1. Amino Acids

5.1.1. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) and Symmetric Dimethylarginine (SDMA)

ADMA (an inhibitor of nitric oxide [NO] syntheses) and SDMA are arginine metabolites formed during enzymatic methylation of arginine residuals. SDMA is a structural isomer of ADMA and is excreted directly by the kidney without any metabolism. A higher serum level of SDMA has been found in people with DKD [82] and SDMA or its ratio to ADMA was predictive of rapid kidney function decline in T2D, independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria [89,101]. ADMA is metabolized into citrulline and dimethylamine in the kidneys and has been associated with rapid kidney function decline in T2D, possibly due to endothelial dysfunction [101].

5.1.2. Aromatic Amino Acids

Both tryptophan (an essential amino acid) and its downstream metabolites, such as kynurenine, are altered in DKD [88,89,91,93,102,103]. Impaired kidney function upregulates tryptophan metabolism pathways and results in increased kynurenine production, stimulating leukocyte activation, cytokine production, oxidative stress, and inflammation [108] (Figure 3). Higher serum levels of tryptophan (or tryptophan/kynurenine) have been found to be inversely associated with rapid eGFR decline in patients with DKD at baseline, independent of baseline renal function [89,102]. Similarly, elevated levels of tryptophan downstream metabolites were positively associated with DKD progression both in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D [88,91,93].
Figure 3. Tryptophan metabolic pathway and development and progression of CKD. Tryptophan is an essential amino acid that cannot be synthesized in the body. A minor fraction of tryptophan (<5%) is metabolized by the indole pathway to produce indoxyl sulfate. Most tryptophan (around 95%) is metabolized by the kynurenine pathway. Downstream metabolites of tryptophan, including indoxyl sulfate, kynurenic acid, picolinic acid, xanthurenic acid, quinolinic acid, and NAD, contribute to oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune response, which lead to the development and progression of CKD. CKD, chronic kidney disease; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide.
Tyrosine and phenylalanine have also been associated with kidney function and albuminuria in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of five cohorts of patients with T2D found a strong inverse association between phenylalanine and baseline eGFR after a comprehensive adjustment for confounding variables, including albuminuria [106], in line with a study comprising three cohorts of patients with T2D [97]. Analyses from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial found a crude association of phenylalanine with macrovascular disease and all-cause mortality in T2D, however, adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors attenuated the associations, and phenylalanine was not associated with microvascular disease prospectively [95]. Tyrosine is synthetized by the hydroxylation of phenylalanine through phenylalanine hydroxylase. In the setting of CKD, dysfunctional activity of phenylalanine hydroxylase leads to impaired conversion of phenylalanine to tyrosine, resulting in higher phenylalanine and lower tyrosine [109]. In contrast to phenylalanine, tyrosine has been both cross-sectionally [106] and prospectively [93,95] associated with DKD. A higher level of tyrosine has been associated with higher baseline eGFR [106] and lower risk of microvascular disease in ADVANCE [95]. The downstream metabolite of tyrosine (o-sulfotyrosine) has been positively associated with ESKD in a Joslin proteinuria cohort including patients with T1D, proteinuria and stage three CKD [93].

5.1.3. Other Amino Acids

Leucine and isoleucine have been inversely associated with baseline eGFR in patients with T2D using NMR [106]. However, a study from Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen using GC-MS found that BCAAs were associated with lower risk of a combined endpoint (kidney dysfunction or all-cause mortality) in patients with T1D [99]. A study from ADVANCE also found that leucine and valine were inversely associated with all-cause mortality in patients with T2D, while alanine, synthesized from BCAAs, was inversely associated with microvascular disease, indicating the complex interactions between BCAAs and diabetes and its complications [95]. Threonine, an essential amino acid involved in the production of glycine, has been associated with lower risk of rapid eGFR decline in patients with T1D [102], and the downstream metabolite of threonine (n-acetylthreonine) was predictive of fast eGFR decline in patients with T2D [91] and ESKD in patients with T1D [93].

5.1.4. Organic Acids Involved in Energy Metabolism

Uracil, a pyrimidine derivative, was altered in urine samples from patients with DKD [85,92]. Pseudouridine, synthesized from uracil, showed association with eGFR decline and urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) increase in patients with T2D [91] and ESKD in patients with T1D or T2D from studies in Joslin [88,93]. 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, a catabolic intermediate of valine which is produced in mitochondria, has been shown to be altered in patients with DKD [85] and has been found to be associated with ESKD in patients with diabetes in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study [105]. Alpha-hydroxybutyrate, positively associated with insulin resistance and diabetes as mentioned above, however, has been found to be associated with lower risk of ESKD in patients with T2D [88]. Glycine has been found to be reduced in urine samples from patients with established DKD [92], and glycolic acid, an intermediate of glycine, was also reduced [85,92] and was associated with ESKD in analyses from CRIC [105]. Acetoacetate has also been inversely associated with baseline eGFR in patients with T2D [106], and 2-methylacetoacetate, an intermediate of isoleucine metabolism, was reduced in urine from patients with DKD [85]. The abovementioned metabolites are all produced in the mitochondria and are involved in energy metabolism, suggesting that mitochondrial function is dysregulated in DKD.

5.2. Lipids

5.2.1. Lipoproteins

HDL particles and their composition (cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1) have been found to be cross-sectionally associated with higher baseline eGFR in studies combining several T2D cohorts using NMR, whereas triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their lipid components were inversely associated, and HDL particles were also negatively associated with albuminuria [97,106]. A two-sample MR study using the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (n = 188,577) and the CKD Genetics Consortium (n = 133,814) suggested a causal link between HDL cholesterol and better kidney function: genetically increased HDL cholesterol was associated with 0.8% higher eGFR and lower risk of incident CKD, and this finding was robust in all the sensitivity analyses; however, there was no strong evidence supporting causal associations of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides with baseline eGFR/UACR or incident CKD [110].

5.2.2. Phospholipids

Phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) are the two most abundant phospholipids of mammalian cell types, comprising 40–50% and 15–25% of the total cellular phospholipids, respectively [111]. A case–control study found lower plasma levels of PCs metabolites in patients with T2D and overt DKD (macroalbuminuria or CKD), and this finding was replicated in another group of patients [90]. A prospective analysis from the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) also found that serum PCs were predictive of incident CKD in hyperglycemic patients, independent of conventional risk factors [104]. Unsaturated PEs have been found to be distinguishable between progressors (≥40% eGFR reduction) and nonprogressors in patients with T2D and baseline eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 [98]. Sphingolipids are also important constituents of cell membranes and have been involved in cell signaling and activation. Ceramides, the essential precursors of sphingolipids, and sphingomyelin, the most common sphingolipids, were altered in patients with DKD. Higher plasma levels of ceramide metabolites have been reported in patients with DKD [90]; studies from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) study found that higher plasma levels of very-long-chain ceramides were associated with incident macroalbuminuria in patients with T1D during 14–20 years of follow-up [87]. Sphingomyelin level has been found to be elevated in patients with DKD [84] and was associated with incident CKD in hyperglycemic patients [104] and progression of DKD in patients with T1D [107].

5.2.3. Fatty Acids and Acylcarnitines

Apart from the link between insulin resistance and diabetes, FFAs have also been found to be predictive of DKD progression. Among patients with T2D and baseline eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, unsaturated FFAs were associated with lower risk of ≥40% eGFR reduction during follow-up [98]. Although associated with macrovascular events and death, FAs were however, not associated with microvascular events or onset or worsening of nephropathy in the ADVANCE trial [112]. Acylcarnitines, involved in the β-oxidation of FAs in the mitochondria and barely detectable in nonpathological conditions, have also been found to be elevated in DKD [90]. C16-acylcarnitine was a strong predictor of fast eGFR decline in patients with T2D and CKD at baseline, independent of traditional risk factors [89]. Disturbed lipid metabolism (remodeling of sphingolipid or impaired β-oxidation of FAs) indicates once again the perturbation of energy metabolism and the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the development and progression of DKD.

5.3. Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i)

SGLT2i reduced the risk of albuminuria and progression of DKD in patients with T2D in multiple clinical trials [15,113,114], however, its underlying effective pathways remain unclear. Metabolomics have been applied to explore potential molecular mechanisms mediating the protective effects of SGLT2i on DKD. Dapagliflozin has been suggested to improve mitochondrial function. Levels of a panel of urinary metabolites previously linked to mitochondrial dysfunction were increased after 6-week of treatment using GC-MS [115]. A study combining metabolomics (plasma) and transcriptomics (kidney biopsy) found three pathways linked with energy metabolism or mitochondrial function have been affected by dapagliflozin, namely, glycine degradation (mitochondrial function), tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) II (energy metabolism), and L-carnitine biosynthesis (energy metabolism) [116]. The improvement of mitochondrial function by SGLT2i as the underlying mechanism to delay the development and progression of DKD further supports the observation that mitochondria play a role in DKD.

5.4. Current Challenges in Metabolomics Studies in DKD

The kidney itself can modulate the metabolic pathways, which as a result, affects the levels of circulating metabolites. Furthermore, the definition of CKD in most of the current studies is based on eGFR rather than the measured glomerular filtration rate, while eGFR is insufficient to reflect early kidney dysfunction. Although changes in metabolites may precede the onset or progression of DKD, they may be resulted from early DKD which is not reflected by clinical manifestations or the surrogate markers (i.e., eGFR). For example, tyrosine is positively associated with baseline eGFR [106], as improved kidney function induces increased production of tyrosine from phenylalanine [109]. Tyrosine and its downstream metabolites are also predictive of onset or worsening of nephropathy [95] and ESKD [93], which may be due to the link between tyrosine and kidney function, that tyrosine metabolism as a reflection of kidney function can predict renal outcomes rather than being a physiological pathway. The complex interplay between the kidney and metabolites makes causal inference difficult. However, some metabolites are predictive of DKD independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria, highlighting their value as prognostic biomarkers. Moreover, the lack of large, prospective cohort studies and independent replications limit the interpretations of these observations and clinical utility of potential biomarkers.

6. Metabolomics in Cardiovascular Disease

The heart is responsible for around 10% of the fuel consumption of whole body [117] and beats around 2.5 to 4 billion times over an average human life, even though myocardial energy stores are only enough for several heart beats [118]. To meet these high energy need, the heart consumes more than 20 g of carbohydrates and 30 g of fat per day and uses 35 L of oxygen to generate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [117]. The metabolism in the heart is highly flexible, such that it can alter the energy utilization rapidly to adapt to the changes in environment via using different kinds of energy substrates, including glucose, fatty acids, ketone bodies, and amino acids [119]. The perturbations of metabolism in the heart can usually be reflected by the changes in the involved circulating metabolites. Detection and quantification of these metabolites provide a way to investigate the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of CVD. Moreover, some of the metabolites have potential to be biomarkers (i.e., screening, diagnostic, or prognostic biomarkers). Metabolomics have been comprehensively applied in studying CVD in the general population and CVD cohorts [119,120]. Table 4 summarizes metabolomics studies in CVD in people with diabetes [95,107,112,121,122,123,124,125,126,127].
Table 4. Circulating metabolites associated with cardiovascular disease in individuals with diabetes.

6.1. Amino Acids

6.1.1. ADMA

ADMA has been found to be elevated in patients with CVD and associated with higher odds of CVD in a cross-sectional study of patients with T2D [122]. ADMA was also predictive of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients with T2D [124] and patients with T1D and DKD [123]. Higher risks of faster eGFR decline and ESKD in patients with higher ADMA [123] suggest that endothelial dysfunction may be a shared mechanism responsible for vascular complications (cardiorenal complications) in diabetes.

6.1.2. Other Amino Acids

Besides the link with diabetes, BCAAs, tyrosine, and phenylalanine have been found to be associated with intima-media thickness and incident CVD in population-based studies [128,129,130]. Higher phenylalanine was associated with risk of macrovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality after adjustment for age, sex, region, and randomized treatment in the ADVANCE trial, however, further adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors attenuated the association [95]. Glutamine and histidine, inversely associated with diabetes [39,52], were also inversely associated with macrovascular outcomes in ADVANCE, although adjustment for risk factors attenuated the associations [95]. Although negatively associated with kidney function [106], phenylalanine has been associated with higher risk of incident heart failure and showed added value on the risk-stratification of heart failure [131]. A CVD index composed of six amino acids (ethanolamine, hydroxyproline, glutamic acid, 3-methylhistidine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) was predictive of CVD [125]. The altered levels of amino acids in diabetes, DKD and CVD might suggest some shared pathways or mechanisms leading to diabetes and its complications.

6.2. Lipids

6.2.1. HDL

Despite the inverse association between HDL cholesterol and risk of CVD in epidemiological studies, MR studies and randomized clinical trials to raise HDL cholesterol level failed to find a protective effect of HDL cholesterol on CVD [132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139]. HDL particles are highly heterogeneous in size, structure, composition, and function [140]. Recent structural and functional studies suggested that the biological function of HDL particles differed in size with small, dense, and protein-rich HDL particles involved in the first step of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) by mediating the effect of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) [141,142]. Besides mediating RCT from macrophages, small HDL particles also have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and endothelial protective functions (Figure 4) [143,144,145,146]. In line with this, small HDL particles have been found to be inversely associated with CVD, stroke, CV death, or all-cause mortality in some well-established studies [147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154]. Nevertheless, contrasting findings have also been reported [155,156]. There seems to be a bidirectional relationship between T2D and HDL whereby diabetes could also modulate the composition and function of HDL [157]. Concentration of large HDL particle and HDL particle size have been found to be increased in patients with T1D compared with participants without diabetes, while small HDL and total HDL particle concentration were reduced [158]. A nested case–control study from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study found that HDL particle subclasses were predictive of incident coronary artery disease in patients with T1D [121]. Large HDL particle size was associated with risk of death in the Catheterization Genetics (CATHGEN) study and a positive association has been found between higher large HDL particle concentration and death in patients with preserved-ejection-fraction heart failure and patients without heart failure, even after stringent Bonferroni correction and comprehensive adjustment including HDL cholesterol [147]. A nested case–control study from the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) cohort measured HDL functional characteristics and found that lower levels of HDL function markers were associated with higher odds of acute coronary syndrome independent of HDL cholesterol in patients at high CV risk [159]. Taken together, despite a complex interplay between diabetes and HDL, HDL particles or function, rather than simply HDL cholesterol, may be of potential to be prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CVD (Figure 4). More studies are warranted in this area.
Figure 4. Dysfunctional HDL and cardiovascular disease. HDL are highly heterogeneous in size, structure, composition, and function. Altered lipid composition, protein components, and sizes result in dysfunctional HDL. Decreased cholesterol efflux from macrophages, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capacity, and endothelial protective function of HDL induce atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

6.2.2. Fatty Acids and Phospholipids

FAs, including n-3 FAs and docosahexaenoic acid, were inversely associated with macrovascular events in a study from ADVANCE, with the associations mainly driven by the associations with CV death and nonfatal stroke [112]. An inverse association between n-3 FAs and death has also been reported [112], indicating the potential of FAs as prognostic biomarkers for CVD in patients with diabetes. Further exploration of the causal role of FAs on CVD may help confirm whether FAs may be therapeutic targets. Apart from the link with progression of DKD, sphingomyelin has been found to be associated with incident coronary heart disease, although further adjustment for CV risk factors attenuated the association [107].

7. Intercorrelation of Metabolomic Biomarkers: Limited Predictive Value

Although independent of traditional risk factors, the selected biomarkers usually provided limited predictive value when added over models comprised of conventional risk factors or established risk equations [59,130,131,160]. The highest quantile of a weighted multimetabolite score (0.320 × phenylalanine—0.474 × non-esterified cholesterol in large HDL-0.321 × ratio of cholesteryl esters to total lipids in large VLDL) could predict incident T2D during 15-year follow-up (OR 5.80 [2.22, 15.1]) compared with the lowest quantile, after adjusting for risk factors including BMI, fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and HOMA-IR [59]. Addition of the metabolite score over a model including the above-mentioned predictors improved the discrimination and reclassification, with significantly improved integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), though the increase in c-statistic was modest and not significant (0.012, p = 0.13) [59]. Despite being predictive of adverse outcomes in patients with diabetes, most of the metabolites (sphingomyelin, amino acids and FAs) failed to increase the c-statistic on top of established risk factors [95,107,112]. As demonstrated by Wang and colleagues, the key determinant of the predictive value of multiple biomarkers was the degree of correlation between biomarkers [161,162]. To improve the c-statistic by 0.05, more than 50 moderately correlated (r = 0.4) biomarkers were needed; while when the biomarkers were weakly correlated (r = 0.05), less than 10 biomarkers would be needed to increase the c-statistic by 0.05. Metabolites identified may be enriched in well-recognized pathways associated with diabetes and its complications (DKD and CVD), such as insulin resistance, energy metabolism, cholesterol biosynthesis and transportation, inflammation, and kidney function [163]. Although biomarkers from a shared pathway may indicate the mechanistic role and therapeutic potential of the pathway, intercorrelation with established risk factors can limit their contribution to the predictive value of a model already including those risk factors [163].

8. Systems Biology: Integrating Multidimensional Data

With advancement in technologies, the availability of multi-omics data such as sequencing data (gene and ribonucleic acid), proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics has made it possible to investigate diabetes and its complications using a systems biology approach [164]. A proportion of interindividual variability of metabolite concentrations can be explained by genetics. Variants identified in a large GWAS can account for up to 23% of the variance of metabolite concentrations [165]. Analysis performed in a Finnish Twin Cohort study found that the heritability estimates ranged between 23–55% for amino acids and other small-molecule metabolites and 48–76% for lipids and lipoproteins [166]. Some loci even explained up to 36% of the variance in circulating metabolites [167]. By using genetic variants associated with metabolites identified in GWAS as instrumental variables, MR can be utilized to make causal inferences with observational data. As genetic variants are randomly assigned during meiosis and fixed at conception, MR can overcome issues of residual confounding or reverse causality commonly observed in epidemiological studies [168]. If a metabolite is causally associated with diabetes or its complications, it may become possible to identify potential drugs targeting the underlying mechanism as a new treatment strategy. Moreover, the integration of multi-omics data or even clinical data using systems biology approaches may identify previously unappreciated inter-relationships between different biological or molecular pathways. For example, by combining metabolomics and transcriptomics via a metabolite–protein interaction network, four pathways associated with eGFR have been identified to be affected by dapagliflozin, which might shine a light on the potential renoprotective mechanisms of SGLT2i [116]. In contrast to the rapid development of “omics” technologies, statistical and computational techniques required to handle high-dimensional data, however, remain a major challenge and bottleneck [169].

9. Exogenous Metabolites, Gut Microbiota, and Diabetes and Its Progression

Exogenous inputs, such as food intake, affect the levels of circulating metabolites [170] and it has been increasingly appreciated that the gut microbiota play a key role in modifying the metabolome and metabolic homeostasis. Dietary phosphatidylcholines, including betaine, choline, and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), have been found to be altered in individuals with CVD and appear to promote development of atherosclerosis [171]. Higher plasma TMAO by LC-MS was also associated with CVE in patients with T2D [127]. A recent bidirectional two-sample MR found that genetically predicted TMAO was not associated with T2D, CKD, or CVD, whereas T2D and CKD were causally associated with higher TMAO, indicating that TMAO may play a mediating role between diabetes/CKD and CVD [172]. Using untargeted LC-MS, more microbial metabolites have been found to be predictive of incident diabetes in the METSIM study [63]. Studies integrating metabolomics with genetics and gut microbiota have been implemented to explore the interplay between genetic variants, dietary intake, gut microbiome and metabolites in diabetes and its complications [65,103].

10. Conclusions and Perspectives

Metabolomic studies present the molecular characterization of diabetes and its complications and could elucidate underlying pathological pathways that are perturbed in a disease state. Metabolomics, especially using the untargeted approach, can provide a global metabolic snapshot and may identify previously unknown molecules that are involved in the development and progression of diabetes. Metabolomic studies, as mentioned above, have identified biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis, and prediction of diabetes and its complications; some metabolites could also be biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic effects of treatment. If being causal of a disease, the associated pathways could even be considered therapeutic targets. The integration of genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, or even clinical data in a systems approach may present a comprehensive metabolic network of cardiometabolic disease. In this regard, metabolomics is a powerful approach which can deepen the molecular understanding of and improve efforts towards preventing or improving clinical management of T2D and its complications.

Author Contributions

Conception or design of the work, Q.J. and R.C.W.M.; acquisition of data and review of literature, Q.J.; drafting of manuscript and revising it critically, Q.J. and R.C.W.M.; final approval of manuscript for publication, Q.J. and R.C.W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.C.W.M. acknowledges support from the Research Grants Council Research Impact Fund (R4012-18), a Direct Grant from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the Croucher Foundation Senior Medical Research Fellowship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Some of the figures were drawn using artwork from Servier Medical Art (http://smart.servier.com/, accessed on 1 September 2021), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, accessed on 1 September 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

R.C.W.M. has received research grants for clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Bayer, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Tricida Inc. and honoraria for consultancy or lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. All proceeds have been donated to the Chinese University of Hong Kong to support diabetes research.

References

  1. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Reutens, A.T. Epidemiology of diabetic kidney disease. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 97, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gregg, E.W.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Burrows, N.R.; Ali, M.K.; Rolka, D.; Williams, D.E.; Geiss, L. Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990–2010. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1514–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wei, M.; Gaskill, S.P.; Haffner, S.M.; Stern, M.P. Effects of diabetes and level of glycemia on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care 1998, 21, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Litwak, L.; Goh, S.Y.; Hussein, Z.; Malek, R.; Prusty, V.; Khamseh, M.E. Prevalence of diabetes complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with baseline characteristics in the multinational A1chieve study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2013, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ninomiya, T.; Perkovic, V.; de Galan, B.E.; Zoungas, S.; Pillai, A.; Jardine, M.; Patel, A.; Cass, A.; Neal, B.; Poulter, N.; et al. Albuminuria and kidney function independently predict cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Toyama, T.; Furuichi, K.; Ninomiya, T.; Shimizu, M.; Hara, A.; Iwata, Y.; Kaneko, S.; Wada, T. The impacts of albuminuria and low eGFR on the risk of cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and renal events in diabetic patients: Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Low Wang, C.C.; Hess, C.N.; Hiatt, W.R.; Goldfine, A.B. Clinical Update: Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus—Mechanisms, Management, and Clinical Considerations. Circulation 2016, 133, 2459–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1789–1858. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, P.; Zhang, X.; Brown, J.; Vistisen, D.; Sicree, R.; Shaw, J.; Nichols, G. Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010, 87, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nowlin, S.Y.; Hammer, M.J.; D’Eramo Melkus, G. Diet, inflammation, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: An integrative review of the literature. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 542698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ma, R.C.; Lin, X.; Jia, W. Causes of type 2 diabetes in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 980–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lindström, J.; Ilanne-Parikka, P.; Peltonen, M.; Aunola, S.; Eriksson, J.G.; Hemiö, K.; Hämäläinen, H.; Härkönen, P.; Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S.; Laakso, M.; et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: Follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet 2006, 368, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Knowler, W.C.; Barrett-Connor, E.; Fowler, S.E.; Hamman, R.F.; Lachin, J.M.; Walker, E.A.; Nathan, D.M. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Neal, B.; Perkovic, V.; Matthews, D.R. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wiviott, S.D.; Raz, I.; Bonaca, M.P.; Mosenzon, O.; Kato, E.T.; Cahn, A.; Silverman, M.G.; Zelniker, T.A.; Kuder, J.F.; Murphy, S.A.; et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zinman, B.; Wanner, C.; Lachin, J.M.; Fitchett, D.; Bluhmki, E.; Hantel, S.; Mattheus, M.; Devins, T.; Johansen, O.E.; Woerle, H.J.; et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2117–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pauling, L.; Robinson, A.B.; Teranishi, R.; Cary, P. Quantitative analysis of urine vapor and breath by gas-liquid partition chromatography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68, 2374–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mahajan, A.; Taliun, D.; Thurner, M.; Robertson, N.R.; Torres, J.M.; Rayner, N.W.; Payne, A.J.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Scott, R.A.; Grarup, N.; et al. Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bory, C.; Boulieu, R.; Chantin, C.; Mathieu, M. Diagnosis of alcaptonuria: Rapid analysis of homogentisic acid by HPLC. Clin. Chim. Acta 1990, 189, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wishart, D.S.; Feunang, Y.D.; Marcu, A.; Guo, A.C.; Liang, K.; Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.; Li, C.; Karu, N.; et al. HMDB 4.0: The human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D608–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wishart, D.S. Metabolomics for Investigating Physiological and Pathophysiological Processes. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1819–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jeong, S.; Eskandari, R.; Park, S.M.; Alvarez, J.; Tee, S.S.; Weissleder, R.; Kharas, M.G.; Lee, H.; Keshari, K.R. Real-time quantitative analysis of metabolic flux in live cells using a hyperpolarized micromagnetic resonance spectrometer. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Motta, A.; Paris, D.; Melck, D. Monitoring real-time metabolism of living cells by fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2405–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Soininen, P.; Kangas, A.J.; Würtz, P.; Suna, T.; Ala-Korpela, M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2015, 8, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Würtz, P.; Kangas, A.J.; Soininen, P.; Lawlor, D.A.; Davey Smith, G.; Ala-Korpela, M. Quantitative Serum Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics in Large-Scale Epidemiology: A Primer on Omic Technologies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 186, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Letertre, M.P.M.; Dervilly, G.; Giraudeau, P. Combined Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 500–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Trivedi, D.K.; Iles, R.K. Do not just do it, do it right: Urinary metabolomics—Establishing clinically relevant baselines. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 1491–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Darshi, M.; Van Espen, B.; Sharma, K. Metabolomics in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Unraveling the Biochemistry of a Silent Killer. Am. J. Nephrol 2016, 44, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lopes, A.S.; Cruz, E.C.; Sussulini, A.; Klassen, A. Metabolomic Strategies Involving Mass Spectrometry Combined with Liquid and Gas Chromatography. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 965, 77–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iadarola, P.; Fumagalli, M.; Bardoni, A.M.; Salvini, R.; Viglio, S. Recent applications of CE- and HPLC-MS in the analysis of human fluids. Electrophoresis 2016, 37, 212–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mil’man, B.; Zhurkovich, I. Mass spectrometric analysis of medical samples and aspects of clinical diagnostics. J. Anal. Chem. 2015, 70, 1179–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dunn, W.B. Current trends and future requirements for the mass spectrometric investigation of microbial, mammalian and plant metabolomes. Phys. Biol. 2008, 5, 011001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shulaev, V. Metabolomics technology and bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. 2006, 7, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Hruby, A.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Hu, F.B. Metabolomics in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Festa, A.; Williams, K.; Hanley, A.J.; Otvos, J.D.; Goff, D.C.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; Haffner, S.M. Nuclear magnetic resonance lipoprotein abnormalities in prediabetic subjects in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Circulation 2005, 111, 3465–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mora, S.; Otvos, J.D.; Rosenson, R.S.; Pradhan, A.; Buring, J.E.; Ridker, P.M. Lipoprotein particle size and concentration by nuclear magnetic resonance and incident type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, T.J.; Larson, M.G.; Vasan, R.S.; Cheng, S.; Rhee, E.P.; McCabe, E.; Lewis, G.D.; Fox, C.S.; Jacques, P.F.; Fernandez, C.; et al. Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stancáková, A.; Civelek, M.; Saleem, N.K.; Soininen, P.; Kangas, A.J.; Cederberg, H.; Paananen, J.; Pihlajamäki, J.; Bonnycastle, L.L.; Morken, M.A.; et al. Hyperglycemia and a common variant of GCKR are associated with the levels of eight amino acids in 9,369 Finnish men. Diabetes 2012, 61, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wang-Sattler, R.; Yu, Z.; Herder, C.; Messias, A.C.; Floegel, A.; He, Y.; Heim, K.; Campillos, M.; Holzapfel, C.; Thorand, B.; et al. Novel biomarkers for pre-diabetes identified by metabolomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferrannini, E.; Natali, A.; Camastra, S.; Nannipieri, M.; Mari, A.; Adam, K.P.; Milburn, M.V.; Kastenmüller, G.; Adamski, J.; Tuomi, T.; et al. Early metabolic markers of the development of dysglycemia and type 2 diabetes and their physiological significance. Diabetes 2013, 62, 1730–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Floegel, A.; Stefan, N.; Yu, Z.; Mühlenbruch, K.; Drogan, D.; Joost, H.G.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.U.; Hrabě de Angelis, M.; Peters, A.; et al. Identification of serum metabolites associated with risk of type 2 diabetes using a targeted metabolomic approach. Diabetes 2013, 62, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mahendran, Y.; Vangipurapu, J.; Cederberg, H.; Stancáková, A.; Pihlajamäki, J.; Soininen, P.; Kangas, A.J.; Paananen, J.; Civelek, M.; Saleem, N.K.; et al. Association of ketone body levels with hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in 9,398 Finnish men. Diabetes 2013, 62, 3618–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mahendran, Y.; Cederberg, H.; Vangipurapu, J.; Kangas, A.J.; Soininen, P.; Kuusisto, J.; Uusitupa, M.; Ala-Korpela, M.; Laakso, M. Glycerol and fatty acids in serum predict the development of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in Finnish men. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 3732–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Tillin, T.; Hughes, A.D.; Wang, Q.; Würtz, P.; Ala-Korpela, M.; Sattar, N.; Forouhi, N.G.; Godsland, I.F.; Eastwood, S.V.; McKeigue, P.M.; et al. Diabetes risk and amino acid profiles: Cross-sectional and prospective analyses of ethnicity, amino acids and diabetes in a South Asian and European cohort from the SABRE (Southall And Brent REvisited) Study. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Fizelova, M.; Miilunpohja, M.; Kangas, A.J.; Soininen, P.; Kuusisto, J.; Ala-Korpela, M.; Laakso, M.; Stančáková, A. Associations of multiple lipoprotein and apolipoprotein measures with worsening of glycemia and incident type 2 diabetes in 6607 non-diabetic Finnish men. Atherosclerosis 2015, 240, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Palmer, N.D.; Stevens, R.D.; Antinozzi, P.A.; Anderson, A.; Bergman, R.N.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; Newgard, C.B.; Bowden, D.W. Metabolomic profile associated with insulin resistance and conversion to diabetes in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E463–E468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fall, T.; Salihovic, S.; Brandmaier, S.; Nowak, C.; Ganna, A.; Gustafsson, S.; Broeckling, C.D.; Prenni, J.E.; Kastenmüller, G.; Peters, A.; et al. Non-targeted metabolomics combined with genetic analyses identifies bile acid synthesis and phospholipid metabolism as being associated with incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2016, 59, 2114–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Qiu, G.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Sun, J.; Ma, H.; Xiao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, X.; et al. Plasma metabolomics identified novel metabolites associated with risk of type 2 diabetes in two prospective cohorts of Chinese adults. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 1507–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cobb, J.; Eckhart, A.; Motsinger-Reif, A.; Carr, B.; Groop, L.; Ferrannini, E. α-Hydroxybutyric Acid Is a Selective Metabolite Biomarker of Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ong, C.N.; Subramaniam, T.; Choi, H.W.; Yuan, J.M.; Koh, W.P.; Pan, A. Metabolic signatures and risk of type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population: An untargeted metabolomics study using both LC-MS and GC-MS. Diabetologia 2016, 59, 2349–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Peddinti, G.; Cobb, J.; Yengo, L.; Froguel, P.; Kravić, J.; Balkau, B.; Tuomi, T.; Aittokallio, T.; Groop, L. Early metabolic markers identify potential targets for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1740–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, J.; Semiz, S.; van der Lee, S.J.; van der Spek, A.; Verhoeven, A.; van Klinken, J.B.; Sijbrands, E.; Harms, A.C.; Hankemeier, T.; van Dijk, K.W.; et al. Metabolomics based markers predict type 2 diabetes in a 14-year follow-up study. Metabolomics 2017, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Shi, L.; Brunius, C.; Lehtonen, M.; Auriola, S.; Bergdahl, I.A.; Rolandsson, O.; Hanhineva, K.; Landberg, R. Plasma metabolites associated with type 2 diabetes in a Swedish population: A case-control study nested in a prospective cohort. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zou, L.; Liang, X.; Ong, C.N.; Tavintharan, S.; Yuan, J.M.; Koh, W.P.; Pan, A. Serum Lipids in Association With Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Prevalence in a Chinese Population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, S.J.; Kwak, S.Y.; Jo, G.; Song, T.J.; Shin, M.J. Serum metabolite profile associated with incident type 2 diabetes in Koreans: Findings from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rebholz, C.M.; Yu, B.; Zheng, Z.; Chang, P.; Tin, A.; Köttgen, A.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; Coresh, J.; Boerwinkle, E.; Selvin, E. Serum metabolomic profile of incident diabetes. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Merino, J.; Leong, A.; Liu, C.T.; Porneala, B.; Walford, G.A.; von Grotthuss, M.; Wang, T.J.; Flannick, J.; Dupuis, J.; Levy, D.; et al. Metabolomics insights into early type 2 diabetes pathogenesis and detection in individuals with normal fasting glucose. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ahola-Olli, A.V.; Mustelin, L.; Kalimeri, M.; Kettunen, J.; Jokelainen, J.; Auvinen, J.; Puukka, K.; Havulinna, A.S.; Lehtimäki, T.; Kähönen, M.; et al. Circulating metabolites and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A prospective study of 11,896 young adults from four Finnish cohorts. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 2298–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Vangipurapu, J.; Stancáková, A.; Smith, U.; Kuusisto, J.; Laakso, M. Nine Amino Acids Are Associated With Decreased Insulin Secretion and Elevated Glucose Levels in a 7.4-Year Follow-up Study of 5,181 Finnish Men. Diabetes 2019, 68, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ottosson, F.; Smith, E.; Gallo, W.; Fernandez, C.; Melander, O. Purine Metabolites and Carnitine Biosynthesis Intermediates Are Biomarkers for Incident Type 2 Diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 4921–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Razquin, C.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Clish, C.B.; Li, J.; Toledo, E.; Dennis, C.; Liang, L.; Salas-Huetos, A.; Pierce, K.A.; Guasch-Ferré, M.; et al. Lysine pathway metabolites and the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the PREDIMED study: Results from two case-cohort studies. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Vangipurapu, J.; Fernandes Silva, L.; Kuulasmaa, T.; Smith, U.; Laakso, M. Microbiota-Related Metabolites and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ouyang, Y.; Qiu, G.; Zhao, X.; Su, B.; Feng, D.; Lv, W.; Xuan, Q.; Wang, L.; Yu, D.; Wang, Q.; et al. Metabolome-Genome-Wide Association Study (mGWAS) Reveals Novel Metabolites Associated with Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Susceptibility Loci in a Case-Control Study in a Chinese Prospective Cohort. Glob. Chall. 2021, 5, 2000088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Qi, Q.; Li, J.; Yu, B.; Moon, J.Y.; Chai, J.C.; Merino, J.; Hu, J.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Rebholz, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Host and gut microbial tryptophan metabolism and type 2 diabetes: An integrative analysis of host genetics, diet, gut microbiome and circulating metabolites in cohort studies. Gut 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sokooti, S.; Flores-Guerrero, J.L.; Kieneker, L.M.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Connelly, M.A.; Bakker, S.J.L.; Dullaart, R.P.F. HDL Particle Subspecies and Their Association with Incident Type 2 Diabetes: The PREVEND Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lynch, C.J.; Adams, S.H. Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Mahendran, Y.; Jonsson, A.; Have, C.T.; Allin, K.H.; Witte, D.R.; Jørgensen, M.E.; Grarup, N.; Pedersen, O.; Kilpeläinen, T.O.; Hansen, T. Genetic evidence of a causal effect of insulin resistance on branched-chain amino acid levels. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Wang, Q.; Holmes, M.V.; Davey Smith, G.; Ala-Korpela, M. Genetic Support for a Causal Role of Insulin Resistance on Circulating Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Inflammation. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 1779–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Neinast, M.; Murashige, D.; Arany, Z. Branched Chain Amino Acids. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 81, 139–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, W.; Wu, Z.; Dai, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, G. Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: Implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids 2013, 45, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wittemans, L.B.L.; Lotta, L.A.; Oliver-Williams, C.; Stewart, I.D.; Surendran, P.; Karthikeyan, S.; Day, F.R.; Koulman, A.; Imamura, F.; Zeng, L.; et al. Assessing the causal association of glycine with risk of cardio-metabolic diseases. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Reaven, G.M. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988, 37, 1595–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Otvos, J.D. Measurement of lipoprotein subclass profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin. Lab. 2002, 48, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Ramírez, M.; Amate, L.; Gil, A. Absorption and distribution of dietary fatty acids from different sources. Early Hum. Dev. 2001, 65, S95–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yuan, S.; Larsson, S.C. Association of genetic variants related to plasma fatty acids with type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycaemic traits: A Mendelian randomisation study. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Zhao, J.V.; Schooling, C.M. Effect of linoleic acid on ischemic heart disease and its risk factors: A Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2019, 17, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lehtovirta, M.; Pahkala, K.; Niinikoski, H.; Kangas, A.J.; Soininen, P.; Lagström, H.; Viikari, J.S.A.; Rönnemaa, T.; Jula, A.; Ala-Korpela, M.; et al. Effect of Dietary Counseling on a Comprehensive Metabolic Profile from Childhood to Adulthood. J. Pediatr. 2018, 195, 190–198.e193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Levey, A.S.; Perrone, R.D.; Madias, N.E. Serum creatinine and renal function. Annu. Rev. Med. 1988, 39, 465–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Xia, J.F.; Liang, Q.L.; Hu, P.; Wang, Y.M.; Li, P.; Luo, G.A. Correlations of six related purine metabolites and diabetic nephropathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Clin. Biochem. 2009, 42, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hirayama, A.; Nakashima, E.; Sugimoto, M.; Akiyama, S.; Sato, W.; Maruyama, S.; Matsuo, S.; Tomita, M.; Yuzawa, Y.; Soga, T. Metabolic profiling reveals new serum biomarkers for differentiating diabetic nephropathy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 3101–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. van der Kloet, F.M.; Tempels, F.W.; Ismail, N.; van der Heijden, R.; Kasper, P.T.; Rojas-Cherto, M.; van Doorn, R.; Spijksma, G.; Koek, M.; van der Greef, J.; et al. Discovery of early-stage biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease using ms-based metabolomics (FinnDiane study). Metabolomics 2012, 8, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Mäkinen, V.P.; Tynkkynen, T.; Soininen, P.; Forsblom, C.; Peltola, T.; Kangas, A.J.; Groop, P.H.; Ala-Korpela, M. Sphingomyelin is associated with kidney disease in type 1 diabetes (The FinnDiane Study). Metabolomics 2012, 8, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Sharma, K.; Karl, B.; Mathew, A.V.; Gangoiti, J.A.; Wassel, C.L.; Saito, R.; Pu, M.; Sharma, S.; You, Y.H.; Wang, L.; et al. Metabolomics reveals signature of mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 1901–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pena, M.J.; Lambers Heerspink, H.J.; Hellemons, M.E.; Friedrich, T.; Dallmann, G.; Lajer, M.; Bakker, S.J.; Gansevoort, R.T.; Rossing, P.; de Zeeuw, D.; et al. Urine and plasma metabolites predict the development of diabetic nephropathy in individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet. Med. 2014, 31, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Klein, R.L.; Hammad, S.M.; Baker, N.L.; Hunt, K.J.; Al Gadban, M.M.; Cleary, P.A.; Virella, G.; Lopes-Virella, M.F. Decreased plasma levels of select very long chain ceramide species are associated with the development of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Metabolism 2014, 63, 1287–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Niewczas, M.A.; Sirich, T.L.; Mathew, A.V.; Skupien, J.; Mohney, R.P.; Warram, J.H.; Smiles, A.; Huang, X.; Walker, W.; Byun, J.; et al. Uremic solutes and risk of end-stage renal disease in type 2 diabetes: Metabolomic study. Kidney Int. 2014, 85, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Looker, H.C.; Colombo, M.; Hess, S.; Brosnan, M.J.; Farran, B.; Dalton, R.N.; Wong, M.C.; Turner, C.; Palmer, C.N.; Nogoceke, E.; et al. Biomarkers of rapid chronic kidney disease progression in type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 2015, 88, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Liu, J.J.; Ghosh, S.; Kovalik, J.P.; Ching, J.; Choi, H.W.; Tavintharan, S.; Ong, C.N.; Sum, C.F.; Summers, S.A.; Tai, E.S.; et al. Profiling of Plasma Metabolites Suggests Altered Mitochondrial Fuel Usage and Remodeling of Sphingolipid Metabolism in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. Rep. 2017, 2, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Solini, A.; Manca, M.L.; Penno, G.; Pugliese, G.; Cobb, J.E.; Ferrannini, E. Prediction of Declining Renal Function and Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Metabolomics. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Li, L.; Wang, C.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Lu, Y.; Fu, P.; Liu, J. Metabolomics reveal mitochondrial and fatty acid metabolism disorders that contribute to the development of DKD in T2DM patients. Mol. Biosyst. 2017, 13, 2392–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Niewczas, M.A.; Mathew, A.V.; Croall, S.; Byun, J.; Major, M.; Sabisetti, V.S.; Smiles, A.; Bonventre, J.V.; Pennathur, S.; Krolewski, A.S. Circulating Modified Metabolites and a Risk of ESRD in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Haukka, J.K.; Sandholm, N.; Forsblom, C.; Cobb, J.E.; Groop, P.H.; Ferrannini, E. Metabolomic Profile Predicts Development of Microalbuminuria in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Welsh, P.; Rankin, N.; Li, Q.; Mark, P.B.; Würtz, P.; Ala-Korpela, M.; Marre, M.; Poulter, N.; Hamet, P.; Chalmers, J.; et al. Circulating amino acids and the risk of macrovascular, microvascular and mortality outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1581–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Tavares, G.; Venturini, G.; Padilha, K.; Zatz, R.; Pereira, A.C.; Thadhani, R.I.; Rhee, E.P.; Titan, S.M.O. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol predicts CKD progression in macroalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease: Results from non-targeted metabolomics. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Barrios, C.; Zierer, J.; Würtz, P.; Haller, T.; Metspalu, A.; Gieger, C.; Thorand, B.; Meisinger, C.; Waldenberger, M.; Raitakari, O. Circulating metabolic biomarkers of renal function in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Afshinnia, F.; Nair, V.; Lin, J.; Rajendiran, T.M.; Soni, T.; Byun, J.; Sharma, K.; Fort, P.E.; Gardner, T.W.; Looker, H.C.; et al. Increased lipogenesis and impaired β-oxidation predict type 2 diabetic kidney disease progression in American Indians. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e130317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Tofte, N.; Suvitaival, T.; Trost, K.; Mattila, I.M.; Theilade, S.; Winther, S.A.; Ahluwalia, T.S.; Frimodt-Møller, M.; Legido-Quigley, C.; Rossing, P. Metabolomic Assessment Reveals Alteration in Polyols and Branched Chain Amino Acids Associated with Present and Future Renal Impairment in a Discovery Cohort of 637 Persons with Type 1 Diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Tang, X.; You, J.; Liu, D.; Xia, M.; He, L.; Liu, H. 5-Hydroxyhexanoic Acid Predicts Early Renal Functional Decline in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Microalbuminuria. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2019, 44, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Colombo, M.; Looker, H.C.; Farran, B.; Hess, S.; Groop, L.; Palmer, C.N.A.; Brosnan, M.J.; Dalton, R.N.; Wong, M.; Turner, C.; et al. Serum kidney injury molecule 1 and β(2)-microglobulin perform as well as larger biomarker panels for prediction of rapid decline in renal function in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Colombo, M.; Valo, E.; McGurnaghan, S.J.; Sandholm, N.; Blackbourn, L.A.K.; Dalton, R.N.; Dunger, D.; Groop, P.H.; McKeigue, P.M.; Forsblom, C.; et al. Biomarker panels associated with progression of renal disease in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 1616–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Winther, S.A.; Henriksen, P.; Vogt, J.K.; Hansen, T.H.; Ahonen, L.; Suvitaival, T.; Hein Zobel, E.; Frimodt-Møller, M.; Hansen, T.W.; Hansen, T.; et al. Gut microbiota profile and selected plasma metabolites in type 1 diabetes without and with stratification by albuminuria. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 2713–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Huang, J.; Huth, C.; Covic, M.; Troll, M.; Adam, J.; Zukunft, S.; Prehn, C.; Wang, L.; Nano, J.; Scheerer, M.F.; et al. Machine Learning Approaches Reveal Metabolic Signatures of Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in Individuals with Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2020, 69, 2756–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kwan, B.; Fuhrer, T.; Zhang, J.; Darshi, M.; Van Espen, B.; Montemayor, D.; de Boer, I.H.; Dobre, M.; Hsu, C.Y.; Kelly, T.N.; et al. Metabolomic Markers of Kidney Function Decline in Patients With Diabetes: Evidence From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020, 76, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tofte, N.; Vogelzangs, N.; Mook-Kanamori, D.; Brahimaj, A.; Nano, J.; Ahmadizar, F.; van Dijk, K.W.; Frimodt-Møller, M.; Arts, I.; Beulens, J.W.J.; et al. Plasma Metabolomics Identifies Markers of Impaired Renal Function: A Meta-analysis of 3089 Persons with Type 2 Diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, 2275–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pongrac Barlovic, D.; Harjutsalo, V.; Sandholm, N.; Forsblom, C.; Groop, P.H. Sphingomyelin and progression of renal and coronary heart disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pawlak, D.; Tankiewicz, A.; Matys, T.; Buczko, W. Peripheral distribution of kynurenine metabolites and activity of kynurenine pathway enzymes in renal failure. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2003, 54, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Kopple, J.D. Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism in chronic kidney failure. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 1586S–1590S; discussion 1597S–1598S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lanktree, M.B.; Thériault, S.; Walsh, M.; Paré, G. HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, and Triglycerides as Risk Factors for CKD: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2018, 71, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. van der Veen, J.N.; Kennelly, J.P.; Wan, S.; Vance, J.E.; Vance, D.E.; Jacobs, R.L. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 1558–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Harris, K.; Oshima, M.; Sattar, N.; Würtz, P.; Jun, M.; Welsh, P.; Hamet, P.; Harrap, S.; Poulter, N.; Chalmers, J.; et al. Plasma fatty acids and the risk of vascular disease and mortality outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE study. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Perkovic, V.; Jardine, M.J.; Neal, B.; Bompoint, S.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Charytan, D.M.; Edwards, R.; Agarwal, R.; Bakris, G.; Bull, S.; et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Wanner, C.; Inzucchi, S.E.; Zinman, B. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1801–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Mulder, S.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Darshi, M.; Kim, J.J.; Laverman, G.D.; Sharma, K.; Pena, M.J. Effects of dapagliflozin on urinary metabolites in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 2422–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mulder, S.; Hammarstedt, A.; Nagaraj, S.B.; Nair, V.; Ju, W.; Hedberg, J.; Greasley, P.J.; Eriksson, J.W.; Oscarsson, J.; Heerspink, H.J.L. A metabolomics-based molecular pathway analysis of how the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin may slow kidney function decline in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020, 22, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Taegtmeyer, H.; Young, M.E.; Lopaschuk, G.D.; Abel, E.D.; Brunengraber, H.; Darley-Usmar, V.; Des Rosiers, C.; Gerszten, R.; Glatz, J.F.; Griffin, J.L.; et al. Assessing Cardiac Metabolism: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1659–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. McGarrah, R.W.; Crown, S.B.; Zhang, G.F.; Shah, S.H.; Newgard, C.B. Cardiovascular Metabolomics. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1238–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ussher, J.R.; Elmariah, S.; Gerszten, R.E.; Dyck, J.R. The Emerging Role of Metabolomics in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cardiovascular Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 2850–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Iliou, A.; Mikros, E.; Karaman, I.; Elliott, F.; Griffin, J.L.; Tzoulaki, I.; Elliott, P. Metabolic phenotyping and cardiovascular disease: An overview of evidence from epidemiological settings. Heart 2021, 107, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Soedamah-Muthu, S.S.; Chang, Y.F.; Otvos, J.; Evans, R.W.; Orchard, T.J. Lipoprotein subclass measurements by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy improve the prediction of coronary artery disease in Type 1 diabetes. A prospective report from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetologia 2003, 46, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Krzyzanowska, K.; Mittermayer, F.; Krugluger, W.; Schnack, C.; Hofer, M.; Wolzt, M.; Schernthaner, G. Asymmetric dimethylarginine is associated with macrovascular disease and total homocysteine in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 2006, 189, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lajer, M.; Tarnow, L.; Jorsal, A.; Teerlink, T.; Parving, H.H.; Rossing, P. Plasma concentration of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2008, 31, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Krzyzanowska, K.; Mittermayer, F.; Wolzt, M.; Schernthaner, G. Asymmetric dimethylarginine predicts cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 1834–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Kume, S.; Araki, S.; Ono, N.; Shinhara, A.; Muramatsu, T.; Araki, H.; Isshiki, K.; Nakamura, K.; Miyano, H.; Koya, D.; et al. Predictive properties of plasma amino acid profile for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Q.; Man, H.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, W. Identification of metabolic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetic coronary heart diseases based on metabolomic approach. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Croyal, M.; Saulnier, P.J.; Aguesse, A.; Gand, E.; Ragot, S.; Roussel, R.; Halimi, J.M.; Ducrocq, G.; Cariou, B.; Montaigne, D.; et al. Plasma Trimethylamine N-Oxide and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 2020, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Magnusson, M.; Lewis, G.D.; Ericson, U.; Orho-Melander, M.; Hedblad, B.; Engström, G.; Ostling, G.; Clish, C.; Wang, T.J.; Gerszten, R.E.; et al. A diabetes-predictive amino acid score and future cardiovascular disease. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1982–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ruiz-Canela, M.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Hruby, A.; Liang, L.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Razquin, C.; Corella, D.; Estruch, R.; Ros, E.; et al. Plasma Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the PREDIMED Trial. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Würtz, P.; Havulinna, A.S.; Soininen, P.; Tynkkynen, T.; Prieto-Merino, D.; Tillin, T.; Ghorbani, A.; Artati, A.; Wang, Q.; Tiainen, M.; et al. Metabolite profiling and cardiovascular event risk: A prospective study of 3 population-based cohorts. Circulation 2015, 131, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Delles, C.; Rankin, N.J.; Boachie, C.; McConnachie, A.; Ford, I.; Kangas, A.; Soininen, P.; Trompet, S.; Mooijaart, S.P.; Jukema, J.W.; et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics identifies phenylalanine as a novel predictor of incident heart failure hospitalisation: Results from PROSPER and FINRISK 1997. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018, 20, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Voight, B.F.; Peloso, G.M.; Orho-Melander, M.; Frikke-Schmidt, R.; Barbalic, M.; Jensen, M.K.; Hindy, G.; Hólm, H.; Ding, E.L.; Johnson, T.; et al. Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: A mendelian randomisation study. Lancet 2012, 380, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Holmes, M.V.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Palmer, T.M.; Drenos, F.; Lanktree, M.B.; Nelson, C.P.; Dale, C.E.; Padmanabhan, S.; Finan, C.; Swerdlow, D.I.; et al. Mendelian randomization of blood lipids for coronary heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Barter, P.J.; Caulfield, M.; Eriksson, M.; Grundy, S.M.; Kastelein, J.J.; Komajda, M.; Lopez-Sendon, J.; Mosca, L.; Tardif, J.C.; Waters, D.D.; et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 2109–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Schwartz, G.G.; Olsson, A.G.; Abt, M.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Barter, P.J.; Brumm, J.; Chaitman, B.R.; Holme, I.M.; Kallend, D.; Leiter, L.A.; et al. Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2089–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Lincoff, A.M.; Nicholls, S.J.; Riesmeyer, J.S.; Barter, P.J.; Brewer, H.B.; Fox, K.A.A.; Gibson, C.M.; Granger, C.; Menon, V.; Montalescot, G.; et al. Evacetrapib and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1933–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bowman, L.; Hopewell, J.C.; Chen, F.; Wallendszus, K.; Stevens, W.; Collins, R.; Wiviott, S.D.; Cannon, C.P.; Braunwald, E.; Sammons, E.; et al. Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Boden, W.E.; Probstfield, J.L.; Anderson, T.; Chaitman, B.R.; Desvignes-Nickens, P.; Koprowicz, K.; McBride, R.; Teo, K.; Weintraub, W. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 2255–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Nissen, S.E.; Tardif, J.C.; Nicholls, S.J.; Revkin, J.H.; Shear, C.L.; Duggan, W.T.; Ruzyllo, W.; Bachinsky, W.B.; Lasala, G.P.; Tuzcu, E.M. Effect of torcetrapib on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 1304–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Rader, D.J.; Hovingh, G.K. HDL and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2014, 384, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Oram, J.F.; Heinecke, J.W. ATP-binding cassette transporter A1: A cell cholesterol exporter that protects against cardiovascular disease. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85, 1343–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Du, X.M.; Kim, M.J.; Hou, L.; Le Goff, W.; Chapman, M.J.; Van Eck, M.; Curtiss, L.K.; Burnett, J.R.; Cartland, S.P.; Quinn, C.M.; et al. HDL particle size is a critical determinant of ABCA1-mediated macrophage cellular cholesterol export. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Camont, L.; Chapman, M.J.; Kontush, A. Biological activities of HDL subpopulations and their relevance to cardiovascular disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kingwell, B.A.; Chapman, M.J.; Kontush, A.; Miller, N.E. HDL-targeted therapies: Progress, failures and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 445–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kontush, A.; Chantepie, S.; Chapman, M.J. Small, dense HDL particles exert potent protection of atherogenic LDL against oxidative stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 1881–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Camont, L.; Lhomme, M.; Rached, F.; Le Goff, W.; Nègre-Salvayre, A.; Salvayre, R.; Calzada, C.; Lagarde, M.; Chapman, M.J.; Kontush, A. Small, dense high-density lipoprotein-3 particles are enriched in negatively charged phospholipids: Relevance to cellular cholesterol efflux, antioxidative, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic functionalities. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2715–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Hunter, W.G.; McGarrah, R.W., 3rd; Kelly, J.P.; Khouri, M.G.; Craig, D.M.; Haynes, C.; Felker, G.M.; Hernandez, A.F.; Velazquez, E.J.; Kraus, W.E.; et al. High-Density Lipoprotein Particle Subfractions in Heart Failure with Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chei, C.L.; Yamagishi, K.; Kitamura, A.; Kiyama, M.; Imano, H.; Ohira, T.; Cui, R.; Tanigawa, T.; Sankai, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; et al. High-density lipoprotein subclasses and risk of stroke and its subtypes in Japanese population: The Circulatory Risk in Communities Study. Stroke 2013, 44, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Otvos, J.D.; Collins, D.; Freedman, D.S.; Shalaurova, I.; Schaefer, E.J.; McNamara, J.R.; Bloomfield, H.E.; Robins, S.J. Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed by gemfibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Circulation 2006, 113, 1556–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Silbernagel, G.; Pagel, P.; Pfahlert, V.; Genser, B.; Scharnagl, H.; Kleber, M.E.; Delgado, G.; Ohrui, H.; Ritsch, A.; Grammer, T.B.; et al. High-Density Lipoprotein Subclasses, Coronary Artery Disease, and Cardiovascular Mortality. Clin. Chem. 2017, 63, 1886–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. McGarrah, R.W.; Craig, D.M.; Haynes, C.; Dowdy, Z.E.; Shah, S.H.; Kraus, W.E. High-density lipoprotein subclass measurements improve mortality risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification in a cardiac catheterization cohort. Atherosclerosis 2016, 246, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Martin, S.S.; Khokhar, A.A.; May, H.T.; Kulkarni, K.R.; Blaha, M.J.; Joshi, P.H.; Toth, P.P.; Muhlestein, J.B.; Anderson, J.L.; Knight, S.; et al. HDL cholesterol subclasses, myocardial infarction, and mortality in secondary prevention: The Lipoprotein Investigators Collaborative. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Parish, S.; Offer, A.; Clarke, R.; Hopewell, J.C.; Hill, M.R.; Otvos, J.D.; Armitage, J.; Collins, R. Lipids and lipoproteins and risk of different vascular events in the MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study. Circulation 2012, 125, 2469–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Joshi, P.H.; Toth, P.P.; Lirette, S.T.; Griswold, M.E.; Massaro, J.M.; Martin, S.S.; Blaha, M.J.; Kulkarni, K.R.; Khokhar, A.A.; Correa, A.; et al. Association of high-density lipoprotein subclasses and incident coronary heart disease: The Jackson Heart and Framingham Offspring Cohort Studies. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016, 23, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Mora, S.; Otvos, J.D.; Rifai, N.; Rosenson, R.S.; Buring, J.E.; Ridker, P.M. Lipoprotein particle profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance compared with standard lipids and apolipoproteins in predicting incident cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 2009, 119, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Akinkuolie, A.O.; Paynter, N.P.; Padmanabhan, L.; Mora, S. High-density lipoprotein particle subclass heterogeneity and incident coronary heart disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2014, 7, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Xepapadaki, E.; Nikdima, I.; Sagiadinou, E.C.; Zvintzou, E.; Kypreos, K.E. HDL and type 2 diabetes: The chicken or the egg? Diabetologia 2021, 64, 1917–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ahmed, M.O.; Byrne, R.E.; Pazderska, A.; Segurado, R.; Guo, W.; Gunness, A.; Frizelle, I.; Sherlock, M.; Ahmed, K.S.; McGowan, A.; et al. HDL particle size is increased and HDL-cholesterol efflux is enhanced in type 1 diabetes: A cross-sectional study. Diabetologia 2021, 64, 656–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Soria-Florido, M.T.; Castañer, O.; Lassale, C.; Estruch, R.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Martínez-González, M.; Corella, D.; Ros, E.; Arós, F.; Elosua, R.; et al. Dysfunctional High-Density Lipoproteins Are Associated With a Greater Incidence of Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Population at High Cardiovascular Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study. Circulation 2020, 141, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Holmes, M.V.; Millwood, I.Y.; Kartsonaki, C.; Hill, M.R.; Bennett, D.A.; Boxall, R.; Guo, Y.; Xu, X.; Bian, Z.; Hu, R.; et al. Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Metabolites and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wang, T.J. Assessing the role of circulating, genetic, and imaging biomarkers in cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation 2011, 123, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Wang, T.J.; Gona, P.; Larson, M.G.; Tofler, G.H.; Levy, D.; Newton-Cheh, C.; Jacques, P.F.; Rifai, N.; Selhub, J.; Robins, S.J.; et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2631–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Roberts, L.D.; Gerszten, R.E. Toward new biomarkers of cardiometabolic diseases. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Joshi, A.; Rienks, M.; Theofilatos, K.; Mayr, M. Systems biology in cardiovascular disease: A multiomics approach. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lotta, L.A.; Pietzner, M.; Stewart, I.D.; Wittemans, L.B.L.; Li, C.; Bonelli, R.; Raffler, J.; Biggs, E.K.; Oliver-Williams, C.; Auyeung, V.P.W.; et al. A cross-platform approach identifies genetic regulators of human metabolism and health. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kettunen, J.; Tukiainen, T.; Sarin, A.P.; Ortega-Alonso, A.; Tikkanen, E.; Lyytikäinen, L.P.; Kangas, A.J.; Soininen, P.; Würtz, P.; Silander, K.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci influencing human serum metabolite levels. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Illig, T.; Gieger, C.; Zhai, G.; Römisch-Margl, W.; Wang-Sattler, R.; Prehn, C.; Altmaier, E.; Kastenmüller, G.; Kato, B.S.; Mewes, H.W.; et al. A genome-wide perspective of genetic variation in human metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Davies, N.M.; Holmes, M.V.; Davey Smith, G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: A guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 2018, 362, k601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Choobdar, S.; Ahsen, M.E.; Crawford, J.; Tomasoni, M.; Fang, T.; Lamparter, D.; Lin, J.; Hescott, B.; Hu, X.; Mercer, J. Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. O’Sullivan, A.; Gibney, M.J.; Brennan, L. Dietary intake patterns are reflected in metabolomic profiles: Potential role in dietary assessment studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; DuGar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.-M. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Jia, J.; Dou, P.; Gao, M.; Kong, X.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Huang, T. Assessment of Causal Direction Between Gut Microbiota-Dependent Metabolites and Cardiometabolic Health: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis. Diabetes 2019, 68, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.