Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please provide more info on cost of LRP spray program, persistence in fresh fruits, and potential associated risks.

Please elaborate further on potential phytotoxicity or possible detrimental effects when LRP are used regarding protection by the end of the field season and during postharvest given the degradation/reduction of a.i. concentrations by LRPs.

I´m attaching a PDF file with several other corrections/suggestions 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

- text in red – reviewers' suggestions

Many thanks to the reviewer for the detailed check of the manuscript and suggestions to improve it. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I found this manuscript to be scientifically sound, however would advise some minor editing of grammar and vocabulary.

 

Author Response

Many thanks to the reviewer for the detailed check of the manuscript and suggestions to improve it.  Thanks for the compliments.

 

Rew 2 reviewers' suggestions

I found this manuscript to be scientifically sound, however would advise some minor editing of grammar and vocabulary.

The whole text was checked again by linguist to improve the English language; grammar and vocabulary. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The study addresses a critical problem and provides very useful and relevant information.  The study was well conducted and analyzed and the discussion elaborated on very important questions raised by the study such as registration of products as residue removers and the safety of breakdown products. One point that I think should be mentioned in terms of the use of organisms is the use of known antibiotic producers, such as Streptomycin. I believe registration would not be possible for such organisms on produce due to their interference with medically-used antibiotics, and their potential impact on the natural, beneficial microflora. Otherwise, I enjoyed reading the manuscript very much and believe it will extensively read and  cited, though Agronomy is not the main publication where research on such topics are published, so it will take time for the research community to become aware of the study.

Author Response

Many thanks to the reviewer for the detailed check of the manuscript and suggestions to improve it.  Thanks for the compliments.

We agree with the reviewers comment on  draw backs at use of microorganisms. We aditionaly elaborated the concerns related to use of microbial preparations close to harvest and mentioned the problem of acceleration of  development of resistance to antibiotics in bacteria pathogenic in humens.

 

The whole text was checked again by linguist to improve the English language. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I reviewed the author´s response and I´m pleased with their answers.