Next Article in Journal
Solar Paint: From Synthesis to Printing
Previous Article in Journal
Stimuli-Responsive Polymers and Colloids under Electric and Magnetic Fields
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on an Improved Phosphate Cement Binder for the Development of Fiber-Reinforced Inorganic Polymer Composites

1
School of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2014, 6(11), 2819-2831; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6112819
Submission received: 28 July 2014 / Revised: 30 October 2014 / Accepted: 30 October 2014 / Published: 12 November 2014

Abstract

:
Magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) has been proven to be a very good repair material for deteriorated concrete structures. It has excellent adhesion performance, leading to high bonding strength with old concrete substrates. This paper presents an experimental study into the properties of MPC binder as the matrix of carbon fiber sheets to form fiber-reinforced inorganic polymer (FRIP) composites. The physical and mechanical performance of the fresh mixed and the hardened MPC paste, the bond strength of carbon fiber sheets in the MPC matrix, the tensile strength of the carbon FRIP composites and the microstructure of the MPC matrix and fiber-reinforced MPC composites were investigated. The test results showed that the improved MPC binder is well suited for developing FRIP composites, which can be a promising alternative to externally-bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for the strengthening of concrete structures. Through the present study, an in-depth understanding of the behavior of fiber-reinforced inorganic MPC composites has been achieved.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Portland cement concrete structures could be deteriorated during service by loading and various environmental effects. To these deteriorated concrete structures, bonding external fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites to the concrete substrates has become a very popular strengthening technique in recent years. FRP composites have many advantages, such as a high strength-to-weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance and a fast-curing property. However, FRP composites possess some weakness. For instance, they have poor resistance to fire and high temperature, because of the use of organic polymer binders (commonly an epoxy resin) as the matrix of the fibers. Consequently, this limits its use in many construction applications [1,2]. In addition, the polymer binders form a sealed coating on the concrete surface that prevents the exchange of moisture, leading to the incompatibility of concrete and externally-bonded FRP composites. To overcome these problems, attempts have been made to develop inorganic matrix-based FRP materials for the strengthening of concrete structures. To attain ideal reinforcing effects, the inorganic matrix requires the following features [3]: (1) sufficient mechanical strength for load transfer; (2) the ability to impregnate and create a strong bond with the fiber-reinforcing materials; (3) the ability to bond strongly to the concrete substrate; (4) thermal and chemical compatibility with the concrete substrate; (5) good workability on site, including good consistency and fast-curing ability; (6) environmental acceptability; and (7) limited shrinkage.
In previous studies, four major types of inorganic matrices have been explored for the development of fiber-reinforced inorganic polymer (FRIP) composites: (1) polymer-modified mortar-based matrix (usually ordinary Portland cement mortar (PMM) [4,5,6]; (2) geopolymer (GP)-based matrix [7,8]; (3) magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC)-based matrix [9]; and (4) magnesium phosphate cement (MPC)-based matrix [10,11]. Among them, magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) has a very high strength, an excellent adhesion performance with other cementitious materials and a good volume stability [10,11]. However, traditional MPC, which consists of magnesia and ammonium phosphates, develops strength by a violent acid-based reaction between magnesia and phosphate solution, resulting in a very fast setting of the paste. At the same time, the traditional MPC would liberate ammonia during mixing and service, which would be harmful to the environment. Therefore, the utilization of this cement is limited. In the past several years, MPC was only used for the rapid repair of concrete structures [11].
In recent years, a new type of MPC has been developed, based on magnesium and potassium phosphate, for which no ammonia is liberated in the hydration process [12,13]. Furthermore, this type of MPC can incorporate a large volume of fly ash and other non-hazardous industrial wastes to form valuable building materials. Therefore, it is thought of as a green and sustainable inorganic binder. MPC is receiving greater attention, because of its many advantages, including quick strength development, good durability and dimensional stability, good water absorption resistance and excellent adhesion properties with old concrete substrates [11,14,15]. It is a very attractive material for the repair of concrete structures, for sealing boreholes and the solidification of hazardous wastes. In addition, MPC also has been proven to be a potential matrix for the development of FRIPs [16,17,18]. The objective of this paper is to further study the properties of MPC paste and mortar as the matrix to develop FRIP composites for the strengthening of concrete structures.

2. Experimental Program

2.1. Materials and Mix Proportions

MPC binder was prepared using dead burnt magnesia (M), mono-potassium phosphate (MPP), Class F fly ash (FA), boric acid (BA) and water (W). The dead burnt magnesia used in the study is a commercially available product with MgO content of 83.18 wt% and an average particle size of 19.16 μm, bought from Jimei Refractories Co., LTD., Jinan, China. MPP and BA were bought from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Co., LTD., China. The mix proportions of MPC paste are summarized in Table 1. The experimental parameters mainly include the fly ash-to-dead burnt magnesia ratio (i.e., FA/M = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) and the water-to-binder ratio (W/B) (i.e., W/B = 0.22, 0.26 and 0.30). The binder was defined as the sum of all of the dry powder blended by magnesia, phosphate and fly ash. After an optimized range of the fly ash content was found (i.e., FA/M = 0.6–1.0), some mix proportions for MPC mortar were also made (see Nos. 3–5 in Table 1). The addition of BA to M was 0.1 by weight. Tap water was used as the mixing water. For the production of MPC mortar, quartz sand passing through a sieve with a size of 600 μm was used as the fine aggregate. Carbon fiber sheets (Figure 1) used to produce FRIP composites had a nominal thickness of 0.11 mm and an area weight of 200 g/m2. The fiber had a tensile strength of 3400 MPa and an elastic modulus of 240 GPa.
Table 1. Mix proportions of MPC paste and mortar (mass ratio).
Table 1. Mix proportions of MPC paste and mortar (mass ratio).
TypeMPC paste/mortarMPC pasteMPC mortar
No.FA:MW:(FA + M + P)MPP:MMPP:M:Sand
10.40.221:1None
20.50.221:1None
30.60.221:11:1:1
40.80.221:11:1:1
51.00.221:11:1:1
61.00.261:1None
71.00.301:1None

2.2. Test Methods

In this study, test specimens of MPC were paste and mortar, respectively. The procedures for preparing MPC paste and mortar specimens are as follows: the phosphate, magnesia, fly ash and boric acid were weighed, respectively, put into a pot and then uniformly mixed in a dry state. In the case of MPC mortar, sand was further added in and uniformly mixed. Then, the mixing water was added into the pot. In the case of the MPC paste, the mixing was completed by hand operation using a spoon for two minutes. In the case of the MPC mortar, the mixing was conducted by a mortar mixer (80 ± 4/min) and lasted for two minutes.
To determine the fluidity of freshly mixed MPC paste, a mini-cone slump flow test was used [19,20], with an upper diameter of 36 mm, a lower diameter of 60 mm and a height of 60 mm (Figure 1). The diameter of the circle of the MPC paste, which then flowed over the horizontal glass plate, was measured. The setting time of the paste was determined using a Vicat needle following ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) C-191.
Figure 1. Mini-cone slump test.
Figure 1. Mini-cone slump test.
Polymers 06 02819 g001
The compressive strength of MPC paste and mortar was determined based on 30 mm × 30 mm × 30 mm cube specimens. The compressive strengths were obtained after 1, 3, 7 and 28 days of curing. The flexural strength of each MPC paste was determined using prisms with dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm and following ASTM C-348.
Pullout tests were performed to evaluate the bond performance of carbon fiber sheets in different MPC paste matrices. The specimens were prepared in the form of a 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm cube in which one layer of dry carbon fiber sheet was embedded at the center, as shown in Figure 2. For the purpose of exerting uniform stresses into the fiber sheets during the pullout tests, the fiber sheets of the cubes were impregnated with a two-part epoxy matrix, Lica®-100 A/B, supplied by Haite Company (Chengdu, Sichuan, China), of which the ratio of the resin to hardener was 2:1 by weight.
Figure 2. Pullout test specimen.
Figure 2. Pullout test specimen.
Polymers 06 02819 g002
The tensile strength of MPC-based FRIP composites was evaluated using a specimen, as shown in Figure 3. It was 3 mm in thickness and made in a dumbbell shape. The fiber sheets were sandwiched in the specimen. The two ends of the tensile specimen were also impregnated with epoxy to avoid local failure between the head and the center part. Tensile tests were conducted after 7 days of curing, using a universal testing machine with a strain rate of 1 mm/min.
Figure 3. Tensile test specimens.
Figure 3. Tensile test specimens.
Polymers 06 02819 g003
For all of the above MPC test specimens, three identical specimens were prepared for each combination of testing parameters. The average strength of the three specimens was presented for discussion. All of the specimens were demolded after 24 h and cured in an environment with a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 55% ± 5%. All of the mix proportions in Table 1 were tested for the fluidity, initial setting time and compressive strength. Compressive, flexural, pullout and tensile strengths were conducted on MPC paste specimens for mix Nos. 1–5 in Table 1, while compressive and flexural tests were conducted on MPC mortar specimens for mix Nos. 3–5.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Properties of MPC Paste

In FRIP composites, the inorganic paste becomes the matrix to bind fibers after hardening. Therefore, its workability plays a very important role in the performance of FRIP composites. In the case of the MPC paste, its workability needs improvement, so as to provide sufficient setting time for the formation of the fiber composites. In this study, boric acid (H3BO3) was used to increase the setting time of MPC. Mix Nos. 1–5, which had a W/B ratio of 0.22 achieved a similar initial setting time of around 25 min.
A higher fluidity of the MPC paste is desired so that higher impregnation of the paste into the fibers can be achieved, leading eventually to better bonding between the fibers and the matrix, as well as the higher tensile strength of the formed FRIP composites. In the meantime, the flow of the MPC paste should also be sticky enough to be applied on the vertical surfaces of columns and soffit of beams/slabs for strengthening applications. Figure 4 presents the fluidity results of fresh MPC pastes. The fluidity of MPC paste depends mainly on the water content of the paste [18]. Obviously, the flow of MPC pastes increases with the water content. However, such a way for increasing the flow may bring some adverse effects to other properties, such as the strength. In the present tests, when the W/B ratio was fixed at 0.22, fly ash was used as the filler to adjust the flow of MPC pastes.
Figure 4 shows the relationship between the flow and the FA/M ratio. It seems that the flow of fresh MPC paste increases with the FA/M ratio and gained an optimized value when the latter reached the value of 0.8. Afterwards, the flow decreased. This behavior might be attributed to the small and spherical grains of FA, which helps to flow the MPC paste at relatively low water contents. However, when the FA/M ratio is too high, the same water content may not be enough to lubricate the binder, resulting in a decreased flow.
Figure 4. The effect of fly ash (FA) on the flow of MPC paste.
Figure 4. The effect of fly ash (FA) on the flow of MPC paste.
Polymers 06 02819 g004

3.2. Mechanical Properties of MPC Paste/Mortar

3.2.1. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of MPC pastes depends on many factors, like the fineness of magnesia, the M/P (magnesia/phosphate) ratio, the W/B ratio and FA content. The M/P ratio also has an effect on the setting time of MPC pastes. In this study, the M/P ratio was selected as 1.0 to ensure an adequate strength with reasonable setting time. Figure 5 shows the compressive strength development of MPC pastes with time for three different W/B ratios. As expected, a lower W/B ratio results in higher strength and vice versa. The strength drops evidently when the water content increases. A W/B ratio of 0.22 led to approximately a 28-day compressive strength of 45 MPa and a 1-day strength of 20 MPa. Such an early strength is very suited for the development of strengthening materials.
Figure 5. Compressive strength of MPC pastes.
Figure 5. Compressive strength of MPC pastes.
Polymers 06 02819 g005
The effect of FA content on the compressive strength of MPC pastes was also studied. The compressive strength of MPC paste increases with FA/M, until its value reaches 0.8 and then decreases (Figure 6). This behavior might be attributed to better compaction of MPC by the micro-sized particles of FA [13]. In the case of MPC mortar, since sand and FA acted as the filler, the addition of FA to the MPC mortar increased the amount of filler in the mix, resulting in a decrease in the compressive strength (Figure 7). The strength development with time also decreased with the increase of the filler content by reducing the reaction rate between magnesia and phosphate solution in the MPC mortar.
Figure 6. The effect of FA content on the compressive strength of MPC paste.
Figure 6. The effect of FA content on the compressive strength of MPC paste.
Polymers 06 02819 g006
Figure 7. The effect of FA content on the compressive strength of MPC mortar (W/B (water:binder) = 0.22).
Figure 7. The effect of FA content on the compressive strength of MPC mortar (W/B (water:binder) = 0.22).
Polymers 06 02819 g007

3.2.2. Flexural Strength

Flexural strength is an indirect measure of the tensile strength of the MPC pastes. The present tests showed that the MPC mortar achieved higher flexural strength than its paste counterpart (Figure 8). The higher strength of MPC mortars might be due to the high density of sand particles, which increased the toughness of the pastes and resulted in higher flexure strength. The flexural strength for different mix proportions of MPC pastes was tested at seven days. An increase in the flexural strength of MPC pastes was observed with the increase of FA content up to 80% by weight of dead burnt magnesia, and then, a decrease was observed (Figure 8). This was similar to the compressive strength of MPC pastes. The flexural strength of MPC mortar was higher than that of MPC pastes, and it keeps increasing with the FA content.
Figure 8. Flexural strength (at 7th day) of MPC pastes and MPC mortars.
Figure 8. Flexural strength (at 7th day) of MPC pastes and MPC mortars.
Polymers 06 02819 g008

3.3. Mechanical Properties of MPC-Based FRIP Composites

3.3.1. Pullout strength of fiber sheets

In order to determine the bond strength of carbon fiber sheets in the MPC paste matrix, pullout tests were conducted. The bond strength influences the effectiveness of the fibers in the inorganic matrix. In the tests, fiber sheets were embedded in a 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm cube of MPC paste, and after seven days of curing, fiber sheets were pulled out of the MPC matrix using a universal testing machine. The pullout bonding strength was then calculated by dividing the ultimate force by the surface area of the fiber sheets embedded in the matrix. Figure 9 shows the effect of the FA-to-M ratio on the pullout strength of carbon fiber sheets. In Figure 9, the MPC matrix samples have a similar pullout strength within an F/M ratio of 0.4 to 1.0. It is indicated that the FA content has an insignificant effect on the pullout strength in a larger F/M ratio range, probably due to the good fluidity of the paste attached to this mix proportion, as discussed previously (Figure 4).
Figure 9. The pullout strength of carbon fiber composites with different FA additions.
Figure 9. The pullout strength of carbon fiber composites with different FA additions.
Polymers 06 02819 g009

3.3.2. Tensile Strength of MPC-Based FRIP Composites

The tensile strength of FRIP composites is one of the most important parameters for such an inorganically-bonded strengthening system. The tensile strength of MPC-based FRIP composite was tested with the FA/M ratio ranging from 0.4 to 1.0. The variation of the tensile strength (seven days) with the FA/M ratio is presented in Figure 10. It can be observed that the tensile strength of fiber sheets in the MPC matrix decreased by 15% when the FA/M ratio increased from 0.4 to 1.0. This trend is slightly different from that of the pullout strength. Such a decrease may be attributed to the increase in the filler material (FA), which reduces the impregnation of the matrix into the fibers. During the loading, a first crack perpendicular to the load direction appeared in the MPC matrix at the central part at a load of nearly 60% of the ultimate load. Sometimes, multiple cracks perpendicular to the load direction appeared in the MPC matrix.
Figure 10. The tensile strength of MPC-based carbon FRIP composites.
Figure 10. The tensile strength of MPC-based carbon FRIP composites.
Polymers 06 02819 g010

3.4. Microscopic Observations

3.4.1. XRD Analysis

XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis of the MPC paste was conducted at 28 days. In the XRD analysis, various peaks indicated a high level of the crystalline phase of the MPC paste (Figure 11). These peaks referred to two types of crystalline compounds: one compound is identified as unreacted magnesia (MgO); the other was formed from MgKPO4·6H2O (MKP), which is the reaction product of MPC with water. Some other phases of diffused peaks can also be found in the XRD pattern, which represent the amorphous phases of MgKPO4·6H2O. Therefore, both crystalline dead burnt magnesia (MgO) and MKP, as well as the amorphous phases of MKP were present in the MPC paste. This is a highly favorable combination and can result in a more compacted and dense microstructure.
Figure 11. XRD of MPC paste.
Figure 11. XRD of MPC paste.
Polymers 06 02819 g011

3.4.2. SEM Analysis of MPC Pastes

SEM (scanning electronic microscope) analysis of the MPC paste matrix was performed at 28 days. Figure 12 shows the micrographs of hardened MPC paste. In Figure 12a, it shows the dense and acicular structure of the MPC hydration product (i.e., MKP). There are also FA particles found in the diagrams, Figure 12b. MKP is the main component for developing the high strength, while FA particles and the residual magnesia act as the filler in the MPC paste. Therefore, the well-compacted structure resulted in the high mechanical strength of MPC pastes. Figure 12a shows the fiber hydrate products in paste, and Figure 12b shows the fly ash particles in MPC paste as fine aggregates. These very fine cracks are the original cracks during the microstructure formation, like in the hardened Portland cement paste.
Figure 12. SEM of MPC paste matrix. (a) Acicular hydrate products in paste; (b) Fly ash particle in the paste.
Figure 12. SEM of MPC paste matrix. (a) Acicular hydrate products in paste; (b) Fly ash particle in the paste.
Polymers 06 02819 g012

3.4.3. SEM Analysis of FRIP Composites

The SEM photos of MPC-based FRIP composites also show the interlocking of fibers with the MPC pastes (Figure 13). The SEM picture was taken from a specimen after failure; the surface was slightly ground before the observation. The SEM analysis was also performed at 28 days, so a relatively higher volume of hydration products could be observed. The penetration of MPC pastes into the fibers and the above-mentioned interlocking effect benefit the bond between the fibers and the matrix, confirming the suitability of using MPC for the development of FRIP composites for the purpose of structural strengthening of concrete structures.
Figure 13. SEM of MPC-based FRIP composites.
Figure 13. SEM of MPC-based FRIP composites.
Polymers 06 02819 g013

4. Conclusions

Based on the current experimental investigations, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • The workability of fresh mixed MPC paste was improved and an initial setting time of around 25 min was achieved by using the boric acid when the W/B ratio was 0.22.The flow of the MPC paste reached up to 145 mm when the addition of FA was 80% by the weight of magnesia. The improved workability of MPC paste can allow its use in situ.
  • The compressive strength development of MPC paste and mortar samples was determined respectively. The compressive strength is inverselyproportional to the W/B ratio. When the W/B ratio was fixed, the compressive strength of the MPC paste reached its peak value when the fly ash-to-magnesia ratio (FA/M) is 0.8. However, in the case of MPC mortar, the samples with FA/M = 0.6 had the highest compressive strength.
  • The flexural strength for different mix proportions of MPC pastes and mortar was tested at 7 days. The MPC mortar exhibited higher flexural strength than the MPC paste given the same W/B ratio. The reason is that the high density of sand particles increased the toughness of the pastes. An increase in the flexural strength of MPC pastes was also observed with the increase in the FA/M ratio up to 0.8.
  • Pullout tests were conducted to determine the bond strength of carbon fiber sheets in the MPC matrix. FA has shown an insignificant effect on the pullout strength of fiber sheets when the FA/M ratio increased from0.4 to 1.0 by weight in the current study.The tensile strength ofMPC-based carbon FRIP composites was also tested. The tensile strength of the FRIP composites decreased in sequence when the FA/M ratio increased from 0.4 to 1.0.
  • According to the XRD analysis, unreacted magnesia (MgO) and both crystal and amorphous forms of MgKPO4·6H2O (MKP) can be identified in the MPC matrix. SEM analyses of hardened MPC pastes showed a dense and acicular structure, which was formed by these crystals, amorphous products and fly ash particles. The micrograph of MPC-based FRIP composites also showed good impregnation of MPC pastes in the fibers, but the bond between fibers and the MPC matrix needs to be improved in a future study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Code: 51172146) and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) (Project No: Poly U 5145/13E), as well as for the research fund supported by Shenzhen Strategic Emerging Industry Development Special Fund Project (JCYJ20120613104803576).

Author Contributions

Zhu Ding was responsible for developing the study plan, working on some experimental measurement and contributed to the paper drafting. Jian-Guo Dai was also responsible for developing the study plan and contributed to the revision of the paper draft. Sarfraz Munir conducted the experimental tests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harries, K.A.; Porter, M.L.; Busel, J.P. FRP materials and concrete—Research needs. Concr. Int. 2003, 25, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  2. Keller, T.; Tracy, C.; Huge, E. Fire endurance of loaded and liquid-cooled GFRPslabs for construction. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manufact. 2006, 37, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wiberg, A. Strengthening of Concrete Beams Using Cementitious Carbon Fibre Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Trapko, T. The effect of high temperature on the performance of CFRP and FRCM confined concrete elements. Compos. B Eng. 2013, 54, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, K.; Young, B.; Smith, S.T. Mechanical properties of pultruded carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates at elevated temperatures. Eng. Struct. 2011, 33, 2154–2161. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hashemi, S.; Al-Mahaidi, R. Experimental and finite element analysis of flexural behavior of FRP-strengthened RC beams using cement-based adhesives. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 268–273. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fang, Z.Z.; Wu, C.W.; Sun, T.F.; Wu, M.X. Applying geopolymer-bonded fibrepastes to RC beam to enhance shear reinforcement. J. Build. Mater. 2009, 12, 361–365. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Zheng, W.Z.; Chen, W.H.; Xu, W.; Wang, Y. Experimental research on alkali-activated slag high temperature resistant inorganic adhesive pasting CFRP sheets on surface of concrete. J. Build. Mater. 2009, 30, 138–145. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, X.; Li, S.B.; Yang, W.L. Experimental study on flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with inorganic adhesive CFRP sheets. J. Build. Struct. 2010, 2, 249–254. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Sarkar, A.K. Hydration/dehydration characteristics of struvite and dittmaritepertaining to magnesium ammonium phosphate cement system. J. Mater. Sci. 1991, 26, 2514–2518. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, Q.B.; Zhang, S.; Wu, X.L. Deicer-scaling resistance of phosphate cement-basedbinder for rapid repair of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wagh, A.S.; Jeong, S.Y. Chemically bonded phosphate ceramics: A dissolution model of formation. J. Soc. 2003, 86, 1838–1844. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding, Z.; Li, Z.J. High-early-strength magnesium phosphate cement with fly ash. ACI Mater. J. 2005, 102, 375–381. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, Y.; Chen, B. Factors that affect the properties of magnesium phosphate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 977–983. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, Z.; Dong, B.; Xing, F.; Han, N.X.; Li, Z.J. Cementing mechanism of potassium phosphate based magnesium phosphate cement. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 6281–6288. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, Z.; Lu, Z.X.; Li, Y. Feasibility of basalt fiber reinforced inorganic adhesive for concrete strengthening. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 287–290, 1197–1200. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dai, J.G.; Munir, S.; Ding, Z. Comparative study of different cement-based ofinorganic paste towards the development of FRIP strengthening of technology. J. Compos. Constr. 2014, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ding, Z.; Li, Z.J. Effect of aggregates and water contents on the propertiesof magnesium phosphor-silicate cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tregger, N.; Ferrara, L.; Shah, S.; Pagination, P. Identifying viscosity of cement paste from mini-slump-flow test. ACI Mater. J. 2008, 106, 558–566. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bouvet, A.; Ghorbel, E.; Bennacer, R. The mini-conical slump flow test: Analysis and numerical study. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, Z.; Dai, J.-G.; Muner, S. Study on an Improved Phosphate Cement Binder for the Development of Fiber-Reinforced Inorganic Polymer Composites. Polymers 2014, 6, 2819-2831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6112819

AMA Style

Ding Z, Dai J-G, Muner S. Study on an Improved Phosphate Cement Binder for the Development of Fiber-Reinforced Inorganic Polymer Composites. Polymers. 2014; 6(11):2819-2831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6112819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Zhu, Jian-Guo Dai, and Sarfraz Muner. 2014. "Study on an Improved Phosphate Cement Binder for the Development of Fiber-Reinforced Inorganic Polymer Composites" Polymers 6, no. 11: 2819-2831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6112819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop