Next Article in Journal
Development of Epirubicin-Loaded Biocompatible Polymer PLA–PEG–PLA Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Stability, and In Vitro Anticancerous Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
The Nanopore-Tweezing-Based, Targeted Detection of Nucleobases on Short Functionalized Peptide Nucleic Acid Sequences
Article

Effect of Sanding and Plasma Treatment of 3D-Printed Parts on Bonding to Wood with PVAc Adhesive

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Chin-San Wu
Polymers 2021, 13(8), 1211; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081211
Received: 22 March 2021 / Revised: 6 April 2021 / Accepted: 8 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing in Wood Science)
Additive manufacturing is becoming increasingly important for manufacturing end products, not just prototyping. However, the size of 3D-printed products is limited due to available printer sizes and other technological limitations. For example, making furniture from 3D-printed parts and wooden elements requires adequate adhesive joints. Since materials for 3D printing usually do not bond very well with adhesives designed for woodworking, they require special surface preparation to improve adhesion. In this study, fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D-printed parts made of polylactic acid (PLA), polylactic acid with wood flour additive (Wood-PLA), and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) polymers were bonded to wood with polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) adhesive. The surfaces of the samples were bonded as either non-treated, sanded, plasma treated, or sanded and plasma treated to evaluate the effect of each surface preparation on the bondability of the 3D-printed surfaces. Different surface preparations affected the bond shear strength in different ways. The plasma treatment significantly reduced water contact angles on all tested printing materials and increased the bond tensile shear strength of the adhesive used. The increase in bond strength was highest for the surfaces that had been both sanded and plasma treated. The highest increase was found for the ABS material (untreated 0.05 MPa; sanded and plasma treated 4.83 MPa) followed by Wood-PLA (from 0.45 MPa to 3.96 MPa) and PLA (from 0.55 MPa to 3.72 MPa). Analysis with a scanning electron microscope showed the smooth surfaces of the 3D-printed parts, which became rougher with sanding with more protruded particles, but plasma treatment partially melted the surface structures on the thermoplastic polymer surfaces. View Full-Text
Keywords: 3D printing; adhesive bonding; plasma treatment; beech wood; PLA; ABS 3D printing; adhesive bonding; plasma treatment; beech wood; PLA; ABS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kariž, M.; Tomec, D.K.; Dahle, S.; Kuzman, M.K.; Šernek, M.; Žigon, J. Effect of Sanding and Plasma Treatment of 3D-Printed Parts on Bonding to Wood with PVAc Adhesive. Polymers 2021, 13, 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081211

AMA Style

Kariž M, Tomec DK, Dahle S, Kuzman MK, Šernek M, Žigon J. Effect of Sanding and Plasma Treatment of 3D-Printed Parts on Bonding to Wood with PVAc Adhesive. Polymers. 2021; 13(8):1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kariž, Mirko, Daša K. Tomec, Sebastian Dahle, Manja K. Kuzman, Milan Šernek, and Jure Žigon. 2021. "Effect of Sanding and Plasma Treatment of 3D-Printed Parts on Bonding to Wood with PVAc Adhesive" Polymers 13, no. 8: 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081211

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop