# Let’s Talk about MOFs—Topology and Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Why We Need Them

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Terminology—General Classification

#### 2.1. Controversy of Metal-Organic Framework versus Coordination Polymer

#### 2.2. Definitions in the IUPAC 2013 Recommendations

## 3. The IUPAC 2013 Recommendations Concerning Nets and Network Topologies

#### 3.1. Topology

**dia**), quartz (

**qtz**) or any other topology, see Figure 1.

**Figure 1.**Network topologies with four-connected branching points or vertices: (

**a**) The

**dia**-net based on the diamond structure; (

**b**) The chiral

**qtz**-net based on the quartz structure; (

**c**) The 2D

**sql**-net.

**dia**-net or the six-connected net based on primitive cubic packing, the

**pcu**-net in for example MOF-5, it is recommended to use freely available software. Two of these systems are continually updated, SYSTRE [14] that will give you the topology once you have decided about vertices and connectivity from your structure, and TOPOS [15,16] that have the possibility of a custom or a fully automated determination of the network topology as well as a complete structure analysis module.

- (1)
- Understand the structure of the materials you have prepared;
- (2)
- Compare your results to materials others have made;
- (3)
- Make your scientific communication more efficient;
- (4)
- Truly make something new by design.

#### 3.2. Topology Descriptors: The Point Symbol

**dia**and the

**qtz**net in Figure 1, they both have six-rings as the shortest ring. So then we can make the concept a bit more detailed and instead count all the shortest rings emanating from a vertex via the different links that it has, giving us three numbers for a three-connected vertex, six for a four-connected vertex and so on. This is a more useful code called the point symbol [19], and is written with the ring sizes in ascending order with the number of rings in superscript.

**dia**- and the

**qtz**-net as the former has point symbol 6

^{6}and the latter point symbol 6

^{4}8

^{2}.

#### 3.3. Topology Descriptors: The Vertex Symbol

**srs**-net, and the non-chiral

**ths**-net both have the point symbol 10

^{3}. We can then extend the concept and for each pair of links sticking out from a vertex calculate how many different ways we can construct these shortest rings. For a diamond net there are for example two different six-rings connecting each pair of links. This we call the vertex symbol [19], and we write this with subscripts for the number of possibilities and with multiplication dots in between each symbol. For

**srs**we get 10

_{5}·10

_{5}·10

_{5}and for

**ths**10

_{2}·10

_{4}·10

_{4}.

#### 3.4. Topology Descriptors: The Coordination Sequence

**lon**-net is very real and has identical point and vertex symbols as the

**dia**-net, 6

^{6}and 6

_{2}·6

_{2}·6

_{2}6

_{2}6

_{2}6

_{2}respectively, so how can we differentiate between them? The structural difference is that some of the six-rings are in boat rather than chair conformation, so that for clear cut cases, where the network of your structure is close to the ideal (most symmetric) form of one of the two nets they are quite easy to distinguish. But we need something we can compute and so turn to the coordination sequence which simply means that we grow the network from one point to its nearest neighbors and count how many these are. For the first point in a four-connected net these are obviously four, but for subsequent growth generations it gets complicated. Usually one computes these up to the 10th generation, sum up including generation 0, and report this as the td10 value. For the

**dia**- and

**lon**-nets this gives:

**dia:**1 + 4 + 12 + 24 + 42 + 64 + 92 + 124 + 162 + 204 + 252 = 981

**lon:**1 + 4 + 12 + 25 + 44 + 67 + 96 + 130 + 170 + 214 + 264 = 1027

**edq**and

**cdj**being one such exception [21].

## 4. A Measure of Complexity: Transitivity and Genus

#### The pqrs Numbers, the Transitivity Symbol

**dia**-net g = 3).

**Figure 2.**(

**a**) Fragment of the diamond net (

**dia**). Different tiles marked in red, purple and blue. (

**b**) Framework of two tiles; (

**c**) Framework of two tiles separated; (

**d**) Two tiles separated. This net has only one type of vertex (p), one type of edge (q) one type of face (r) and one type of tile (s), so it has the transitivity 1111.

**srs**-net, the 4-connected

**nbo**- and

**dia**-nets, the 6-connected

**pcu**-net, and the 8-connected

**bcu**-net. These five are in some sense the extended network analogues of the platonic bodies, the five polyhedra built from one kind of face and one kind of vertex.

## 5. The Space within, Dual Nets and Interpenetration

#### 5.1. Dual Nets

**Figure 3.**(

**a**) The

**pcu**net transitivity 1111 with its dual net that is an identical

**pcu**net (self-dual); (

**b**) The

**nbo**net in white, transitivity 1111, with its dual the

**bcu**net, also with transitivity 1111. Thus an identical net can easily interpenetrate the

**pcu**net, while this possibility is not obvious for

**nbo**or

**bcu**.

#### 5.2. Interpenetration

## 6. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix

_{4}O

_{4}-cubane based MOF forming a

**dia**-net [35].

## References and Notes

- The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). Available online: http://www.iupac.org/ (accessed on 30 November 2014).
- Batten, S.R.; Champness, N.R.; Chen, X.M.; Garcia-Martinez, J.; Kitagawa, S.; Öhrström, L.; O’Keeffe, M.; Suh, M.P.; Reedijk, J. Coordination polymers, metal-organic frameworks and the need for terminology guidelines. CrystEngComm
**2012**, 14, 3001–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Öhrström, L. Coordination Polymers and Metal Organic Frameworks: Terminology and Nomenclature Guidelines. Chem. Int. 2010. Available online: http://www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2010/3201/pp1_2009-012-2-200.html (accessed on 30 November 2014).
- Drahl, C. Confusion over scientific nomenclature is par for the chemistry course. Chem. Eng. News
**2014**, 92, 28–29. [Google Scholar] - Dagani, R. Gallium “triple bonds” under fire. Chem. Eng. News
**1998**, 76, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Batten, S.R.; Champness, N.R.; Chen, X.M.; Garcia-Martinez, J.; Kitagawa, S.; Öhrström, L.; O’Keeffe, M.; Suh, M.P.; Reedijk, J. Terminology of metal-organic frameworks and coordination polymers (IUPAC recommendations 2013). Pure Appl. Chem.
**2013**, 85, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ockwig, N.W.; Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Reticular Chemistry: Occurence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res.
**2005**, 38, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Öhrström, L.; Larsson, K. Molecule-Based Materials: The Structural Network Approach; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Öhrström, L.; Network and Graph Set Analysis. Encyclopedia of Supramolecular Chemistry, Volume 8. Supramolecular Materials Chemistry; Barbour, L., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Öhrström, L.; O’Keeffe, M. Network topology approach to new allotropes of the group 14 elements. Z. Krist. Cryst. Mat.
**2013**, 228, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reticular Chemistry Structure Resource. Available online: http://rcsr.anu.edu.au (accessed on 30 November 2014).
- O’Keeffe, M.; Peskov, M.A.; Ramsden, S.; Yaghi, O.M. The Reticular Chemistry Structure Resource (RCSR) Database of, and Symbols for, Crystal Nets. Acc. Chem. Res.
**2008**, 41, 1782–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Deconstructing the crystal structures of metal-organic frameworks and related materials into their underlying nets. Chem. Rev.
**2011**, 112, 675–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - SYSTRE 1.2. Available online: http://gavrog.org/Systre-Help.html (accessed on 30 November 2013).
- Blatov, V.A.; Shevchenko, A.P.; Proserpio, D.M. Ac.Pavlov St. 1, 443011 Samara, Russia. http://topospro.com.
- Blatov, V.A.; Shevchenko, A.P.; Proserpio, D.M. Applied Topological Analysis of Crystal Structures with the Program Package ToposPro. Cryst. Growth Des.
**2014**, 14, 3576–3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - El-Kaderi, H.M.; Hunt, J.R.; Mendoza-Cortes, J.L.; Cote, A.P.; Taylor, R.E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Designed synthesis of 3D covalent organic frameworks. Science
**2007**, 316, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - In this article I use the familiar term “ring” without further definition. However, one should note that more strictly a ring is defined as a cycle that is not the sum of two smaller cycles, so that some rings we see in these networks are cycles rather than rings
- Blatov, V.A.; O’Keeffe, M.; Proserpio, D.M. Vertex-, face-, point-, Schlafli-, and Delaney-symbols in nets, polyhedra and tilings: Recommended terminology. CrystEngComm
**2010**, 12, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Németh, P.; Garvie, L.A.J.; Aoki, T.; Dubrovinskaia, N.; Dubrovinsky, L.; Buseck, P.R. Lonsdaleite is faulted and twinned cubic diamond and does not exist as a discrete material. Nat. Commun.
**2014**, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Li, M.; Li, D.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Topological Analysis of Metal-Organic Frameworks with Polytopic Linkers and/or Multiple Building Units and the Minimal Transitivity Principle. Chem. Rev.
**2014**, 114, 1343–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - O’Keeffe, M. Nets, tiles, and metal-organic frameworks. APL Mater.
**2014**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; Dress, A.W.M.; Huson, D.H.; Klinowski, J.; Mackay, A.L. Systematic enumeration of crystalline networks. Nature
**1999**, 400, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bonneau, C.; Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Three-periodic nets and tilings: Minimal nets. Acta Cryst. A
**2004**, 60, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Three-periodic nets and tilings: Regular and quasiregular nets. Acta Cryst. A
**2003**, 59, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Three-periodic nets and tilings: Semiregular nets. Acta Cryst. A
**2003**, 59, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delgado-Friedrichs, O.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. The CdSO
_{4}, rutile, cooperite and quartz dual nets: Interpenetration and catenation. Solid State Sci.**2003**, 5, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kanda, S.; Saito, Y. Synthesis of co-ordination compounds of high molecular weight. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
**1957**, 30, 192–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Batten, S.R. Toppology of Interpenetration. CrystEngComm
**2001**, 3, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Batten, S.R.; Robson, R. Interpenetrating nets: Ordered, periodic entanglement. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
**1998**, 37, 1461–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Blatov, V.A.; Carlucci, L.; Giani, G.; Proserpio, D.M. Interpenetrating metal-organic and inorganic 3D network: A computer-aided systematic investigation. Part I. Analysis of the Cambridge structural Database. CrystEngComm
**2004**, 6, 377–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Proserpio, D.M. Polycatenation, polythreading and polyknotting in coordination network chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev.
**2003**, 246, 247–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mitina, T.G.; Blatov, V.A. Topology of 2-Periodic Coordination Networks: Toward Expert Systems in Crystal Design. Cryst. Growth Des.
**2013**, 13, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Proserpio, D.M.; Mitina, T.G.; Blatov, V.A. Entangled Two-Dimensional Coordination Networks: A General Survey. Chem. Rev.
**2014**, 114, 7557–7580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Karmakar, A.; Oliver, C.L.; Roy, S.; Öhrström, L. The synthesis, structure, topology and catalytic application of a novel cubane-based copper(II) metal-organic framework derived from a flexible amido tripodal acid. Dalton Trans.
**2015**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Öhrström, L.
Let’s Talk about MOFs—Topology and Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Why We Need Them. *Crystals* **2015**, *5*, 154-162.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5010154

**AMA Style**

Öhrström L.
Let’s Talk about MOFs—Topology and Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Why We Need Them. *Crystals*. 2015; 5(1):154-162.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5010154

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Öhrström, Lars.
2015. "Let’s Talk about MOFs—Topology and Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Why We Need Them" *Crystals* 5, no. 1: 154-162.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5010154