Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Modeling of Plastic Deformation of a Tube from Dispersion-Hardened Aluminum Alloy in an Inhomogeneous Temperature Field
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of Al-2.18Mg-1.92Li Alloy’s Microstructure Degradation in Corrosive Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Processing and Optical Properties of Eu-Doped Chloroborate Glass-Ceramic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Hydride Process in Achieving Equimolar TiNbZrHfTa BCC Refractory High Entropy Alloy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/cryst10121102
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Phase Transition, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d High-Entropy Alloys

by
Li Ma
1,
Zhi-Peng Wang
2,
Guo-Hua Huang
1,
Jin-Li Huang
1,
Ping-Ying Tang
1,* and
Tou-Wen Fan
2,*
1
Key Laboratory of New Electric Functional Materials of Guangxi Colleges and Universities, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530023, China
2
School of Material Science and Energy Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(12), 1102; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121102
Submission received: 2 November 2020 / Revised: 27 November 2020 / Accepted: 1 December 2020 / Published: 2 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Alloy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The phase stability and elastic properties of paramagnetic (PM), ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases in L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) alloy are first investigated using the exact muffin-tin orbitals (EMTO) method in combination with the coherent potential approximation (CPA). The result shows the AFM structure phase of the three is the most stable in the ground state. Calculated elastic constants show that all the phases are mechanically stable, and have uncovered that L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) can achieve good strength and ductility simultaneously. Then, crucial thermal properties are described satisfactorily using the Debye–Grüneisen model, showing heat capacity, Gibbs free energy G, the competitive contribution of entropy −TS and enthalpy H exhibiting significant temperature dependences. Moreover, the magnetic phase transition thermodynamics was studied, which suggests that −TS has a primary contribution to Gibbs free energy and may play a key role in the phase transition. The present results can benefit the understanding of the mechanical, thermodynamic and magnetic properties of the L12 structure phase in 3d high-entropy alloys.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

High-entropy alloys (HEAs), near-equiatomic solid solutions of five or more elements, represent a new strategy for the design of materials with properties superior to those of conventional alloys. [1,2]. With multiple principal components, they inherently possess unique microstructures and many impressive properties, such as high strength and hardness, excellent magnetic property, thermal stability, wear-resistance and corrosion resistance [3,4,5]. Although HEAs often form single-phase alloys because of a high configuration entropy of mixing, such as a simple face-centered cubic (FCC) or body-centered cubic (BCC) structure [6,7], intermetallic compound precipitates with B2, L12 or L21 structures are observed in HEAs through X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopes (TEM) measurements [8,9,10]. These phases are beneficial to the mechanical behavior of HEAs. For instance, the ordered L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) phase (γ′ phase), which has been obtained by annealing of Al0.3CuCrFeNi2 at 550–700 °C, could improve the mechanical strength, grain refinement, microstructures and coarsening behavior of HEAs [8]. These favorable properties seem to originate from the γ′ precipitates uniformly distributed within a disordered FCC solid solution matrix of HEAs, mimicking typical γ + γ′ microstructures observed in the case of many Ni-super alloy and forms the basis of the excellent high temperature mechanical properties of these alloys. Therefore, the investigations of L12 precipitates are crucial for designing potential high temperature 3d-HEAs. However, up to now, little is known about phase stability, elastic and thermodynamic properties for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) precipitate. Moreover, the L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) phase includes magnetic transition elements Ni, Cu, Cr and Fe, the investigation of magnetism in the (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) phase is also significant.
In the present work, the exact muffin-tin orbitals (EMTO) method [11,12] in combination with coherent potentials approximation (CPA) [13] are employed to investigate the phase stability and elastic properties of the paramagnetic (PM), ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases in L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr). The quasi-harmonic Debye–Grüneisen approach [14] has turned out to be valid in describing the temperature-dependent thermodynamic properties. Specially, magnetic phase transition is predicted by Gibbs free energy G and the competitive contribution of entropy −TS and enthalpy H, simultaneously.

2. Computational Details

The EMTO–CPA method [11,12,13] within the framework of density functional theory (DFT), is used for total energies calculations, as this method has proved to be very useful to study the equilibrium properties of HEAs [15,16,17]. Within the EMTO theory, the single-electron equations were solved for the optimized overlapping muffin-tin potential and the full charge density technique [18] was used to compute the total energy. Generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) was used for the exchange correlation functional [19], and the Brillouin zone integrations were performed on 17 × 17 × 17 k-points mesh. The electrostatic correction to the single-site CPA was described using the screened impurity model with a screening parameter 0.9 [20]. In our calculations, the atomic proportions of Ni, Cu, Al, Fe and Cr in (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) were designed as 37.50%, 37.50%, 8.33%, 8.33% and 8.34%, respectively. Here we employed the disordered local magnetic moment (DLM) model [21,22,23] to describe the magnetic states of HEAs. According to the model, an alloy component M of concentration m is presented by its spin-up (↑) and spin-down (↓) counterparts assumed to be distributed randomly on the underlying sublattice; i.e., each magnetic alloy component could be treated as M↑m/2M↑m/2 (FM) and M↓m/2M↓m/2 (AFM).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase Stability

In order to check for the structural stability in paramagnetic (PM), ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr), the total energies are calculated as a function of unit cell volume and fitted to Birch Murnaghan equation of state (BM3-EOS) [24]. The obtained energy versus volume curves are shown in Figure 1. It can be clearly seen that the L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) is stable in the AFM phase in the ground state because it shows the lowest total energy of the AFM configuration corresponding to the equilibrium lattice constant. Interestingly, the curves have three intersection in the figure, implying that magnetic phase transition among PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) would probably happen under high temperature and high pressure, which are discussed in Section 3.3.
To further determine the phase stability, the mixing energies (Emix) against the different magnetic configurations HEAs are also calculated from the following equation:
E m i x = ( E t o t − ∑ i N i E s o l i d i ) / ∑ i N i
where Etot is the total energy per atom of the HEAs and E s o l i d i is the energy per atom of ith composition in fcc structure, Ni refers to the atom number of ith composition in the HEAs. The calculation mixing energies Emix are, respectively, −8.95, −8.97 and −8.98 ev for PM, FM and AFM structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr). The negative mixing energies Emix prove that of all the phases of HEAs are stable at zero temperature and zero pressure. Moreover, the values of Emix demonstrate the order of PM > FM > AFM, suggesting the AFM structure phase is the energetically favorable phase at low temperature, while PM structure phase is the most instable. Additionally, the magnetic phase transition may easily occur due to the small difference in Emix for the different magnetic structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).

3.2. Elastic Properties

The elastic constants and moduli provide important parameters of mechanical properties, such as stability, stiffness of materials and nature of interatomic forces. Hence, the study of the elastic properties of different magnetic structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are necessary. The elastic constants (C11, C12 and C44) are calculated through the small strains to the equilibrium unit cell and determined by the corresponding variations in the total energy [25], and the elastic moduli (B, G, and E) are derived by means of the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation [26]. As a result, the obtained elastic constants and elastic moduli are summarized in Table 1. It is noted that all the elastic constants meet the corresponding mechanical stability criteria [27,28]: C11 − C12 > 0, C11 > 0, C44 > 0, C11 + 2C12 > 0, and C’ = (C11 − C12)/2 > 0. This implies all the structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are mechanically stable, which agree with the conclusion obtained from the mixing energies above.
Generally, bulk modulus B indicates the compressibility of the solid under hydrostatic pressure, which can be also used to describe the strength of materials. Calculated bulk modulus B shows that all phases of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are stronger due to large bulk modulus. Close comparison shows that the B of the PM structure (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) is the highest, indicating strongest compression resistance compared to the FM and AFM structure HEAs. Moreover, shear modulus G is more relevant to hardness compared to B, which is defined as the force that resists shape change under shear stress [29,30]. The order of G is as follows: PM < FM < AFM, indicating that the hardness of the PM and AFM structure phases are the lowest and highest in these HEAs, respectively. In addition, the Young’s modulus E is regarded as a standard of solid stiffness, and the higher Young’s modulus corresponds to the stiffer solid. As seen in Table 1, the AFM structure HEA has the largest E among these HEAs, which means that the AFM structure phase is the stiffest compound.
It is well known that the ductility and brittleness of alloys are related to the values of Pugh’s modulus ratio G/B Cauchy pressure C12 − C44 and Poisson ratio ν. If a material exhibits ductility, the alloy should meet the following requirements: G/B < 0.57, C12 − C44 > 0 and ν > 0.26 [27,31,32]. Generally, the larger the C12 − C44 and v and the smaller the G/B, the more ductile the material is [31]. The calculated G/B, C12 − C44 and v of different magnetic structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are also shown in Table 1. It is obvious that, for all magnetic structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr), their G/B, C12 − C44 and v values obey the ductile conditions, indicating that these HEAs are ductile. Moreover, PM structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are the most ductile due to the largest C12 − C44 and ν and the smallest G/B.

3.3. Thermodynamic Properties and Magnetic Phase Transition

The thermal property provides valuable information on the specific performance of solids under the application of temperature, and it plays a very important role in helping understanding on phase transition. In this paper, the quasi-harmonic Debye model [14] in the temperature range of 0 to 1200 K and pressure range of 0 to 60 GP is studied to derive thermodynamic properties of three magnetic phases in L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr), as this method has been successfully applied to various thermodynamic calculations [33]. The knowledge of the heat capacity is one of the most important thermodynamic properties which not only provides essential insight into its vibrational properties but also is mandatory for many applications [33]. Figure 2 shows the heat capacities at a constant volume (CV) of PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) as functions of the temperature under 0 GP. As it can be seen, all magnetic configuration HEAs show the same changing trend with increasing temperature: CV is proportional to T3 at low temperature and converges to the Dulong–Petit limit at high temperature, which obeys the change law. It is should be noted that the concentration of magnetic behavior has little influence on the heat capacity behavior, due to the values of CV of all phases for (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) being extremely similar. In other words, the CV is not sensitive to the presence of magnetism as the temperature increases.
In order to investigate magnetic phase transition of the L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr), the Gibbs free energy G as a function of temperature at constant pressures was calculated by the equation G = H − TS, and the two components of enthalpy H and entropy contribution −TS were also studied, which are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. It is clear that from Figure 3, for all phases, the variation tendency of the H and −TS at 20, 30 and 40 GPa are, to some extent, similar. The H increases as the temperature increases, while the −TS monotonously decreases. As pressures rise, the values of H and −TS of all phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are very close, this means the concentration of magnetic behavior has little influence on the H and −TS at high pressure; this is because magnetism in 3d metals is typically suppressed by the application of pressure [34,35]. Figure 4 shows that as the pressure increases, the G values increase, demonstrating that high pressure significantly affects the system energy and reduces the stability of HEAs. Moreover, upon comparison of the values of G, H and −TS, the variation tendency of G is the same as the −TS, but contrary to the H, suggesting that −TS has a primary contribution to Gibbs free energy, that is to say that the entropy may play a key role in the phase transition in the annealing process.
Generally, the smaller the G, the more stable the material is. It should be noted that in Figure 4 there are two energetically favorable phases from 0 to 1200 K under 20 and 40 GPa, showing that the magnetic phase transformation will occur from the AFM to FM phase in the temperature range of 900 to 1050 K at 20 GPa, and from the AFM to PM phase in the temperature range of 150 to 300 K at 40 GPa, respectively. In particular, the tow phase transformation will occur under 30 GPa; the phase change temperatures are 450~600 and 1050~1050 K, respectively.

4. Conclusions

The phase stability, elastic and thermodynamic properties and magnetic phase transition of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d high-entropy alloys were investigated employing by EMTO–CPA in combination with the quasi-harmonic Debye–Grüneisen model. The calculated total energies and mixing energies show that all the magnetic structures of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are stable, and the AFM structure phase is the energetically favorable phase in the ground state. The calculated elastic constants satisfy the stability criteria, implying that all the structures (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) are mechanically stable. In particular, L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) shows both good strength and extensibility due to the large bulk modulus B and Poisson ratio ν. The thermodynamic property investigation shows that the temperature has a significant effect on heat capacity, Gibbs free energy G and the competitive contribution of entropy −TS and enthalpy H. As pressures rise, the concentration of magnetic behavior has little influence on the H and −TS at high pressure due to pressure-induced suppression magnetism in 3d HAEs. Evidently, our present work may be valuable for understanding the mechanical, thermodynamic and magnetic properties of the L12 structure phase in 3d high-entropy alloys.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M. and T.-W.F.; formal analysis, L.M.; data curation, Z.-P.W.; validation, Z.-P.W. and G.-H.H.; resources, Z.-P.W.; investigation, J.-L.H. and P.-Y.T. They contributed to discussions and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific research fund of Guangxi education department (2019KY0415), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and Featured Materials, Guangxi University (2019GXYSOF07) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2017GXNSFAA198154, 2020GXNSFAA159057).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ye, Y.F.; Wang, Q.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.T.; Yang, Y. High-entropy alloy: Challenges and prospects. Mater. Today 2016, 19, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laplanche, G.; Berglund, S.; Reinhart, C.; Kostka, A.; George, E.P. Phase stability and kinetics of σ-phase precipitation in CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2018, 161, 338–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fu, Z.; Chen, W.; Wen, H.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, B.; Zhou, Y.; Lavernia, E. Microstructure and strengthening mechanisms in an FCC structured single-phase nanocrystalline Co25Ni25Fe25Al7.5Cu17.5 high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 2016, 107, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Chen, G.L. Solid solution alloys of AlCoCrFeNiTix with excellent room-temperature mechanical properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shon, Y.; Joshi, S.S.; Katakam, S.; Rajamure, R.S.; Dahotre, N.B. Laser additive synthesis of high entropy alloy coating on aluminum: Corrosion behavior. Mater. Lett. 2015, 142, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Senkov, O.N.; Scott, J.M.; Senkova, S.V.; Miracle, D.B.; Woodward, C.F. Microstructure and room temperature properties of a high-entropy TaNbHfZrTi alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 6043–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yong, D.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Li, T. Effects of electro-negativity on the stability of topologically close-packed phase in high entropy alloys. Intermetallics 2014, 52, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gwalani, B.; Soni, V.; Choudhuri, D.; Lee, M.; Hwang, J.Y.; Nam, S.J.; Ryu, H.; Hong, S.H.; Banerjee, R. Stability of ordered L12 and B2 precipitates in face centered cubic based high entropy alloys—Al0.3CoFeCrNi and Al0.3CuFeCrNi2. Scripta Mater. 2016, 123, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Cao, P.; Lin, D.; Tian, F. Stability of L21 (NiM)2TiAl (M = Co, Fe) in high-entropy alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 764, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choudhuri, D.; Alam, T.; Borkar, T.; Gwalani, B.; Mantri, A.S.; Srinivasan, S.G.; Gibson, M.A.; Banerjee, R. Formation of a Huesler-like L2 1 phase in a CoCrCuFeNiAlTi high-entropy alloy. Scripta Mater. 2015, 100, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vitos, L. Total-energy method based on the exact muffin-tin orbitals theory. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 2001, 64, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vitos, L.; Skriver, H.L.; Johansson, B.; Kollár, J. Application of the exact muffin-tin orbitals theory: The spherical cell approximation. Comput. Mater Sci. 2012, 18, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vitos, L.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Johansson, B. Anisotropic lattice distortions in random alloys from first-principles theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 156401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Otero-De-La-Roza, A.; Abbasi-Pérez, D.; Luaña, V. GIBBS2: A new version of the quasiharmonic model code. II. Models for solid-state thermodynamics, features and implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011, 182, 2232–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, F.; Delczeg, L.; Chen, N.; Varga, L.K.; Shen, J.; Vitos, J. Structural stability of NiCoFeCrAlx high-entropy alloy from ab initio theory. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 1336–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, F.; Varga, L.K.; Chen, N.; Shen, J.; Vitos, L. Ab initio design of elastically isotropic TiZrNbMoVx high-entropy alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 599, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, P.; Ni, X.; Tian, F.; Varga, L.K.; Vitos, L. Ab initio study of Al x MoNbTiV high-entropy alloys. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 075401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vitos, L. Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Perdew, P.J.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korzhavyi, P.A.; Ruban, A.V.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Skriver, H.L. Madelung energy for random metallic alloys in the coherent potential approximation. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 5773–5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Staunton, J.; Gyorffy, B.L.; Pindor, A.J.; Stocks, G.M.; Winter, H. The “disordered local moment” picture of itinerant magnetism at finite temperatures. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1984, 45, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Schönecker, S.; Zhao, J.; Johansson, B.; Vitos, L. Elastic properties of Fe–Mn random alloys studied by ab initio calculations. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 91, 3124–3161. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tian, F.; Varga, L.K.; Chen, N.; Delczeg, L.; Vitos, L. Ab initio investigation of high-entropy alloys of 3d elements. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Birch, F. Finite Strain Isotherm and Velocities for Single Crystal and Polycrystalline NaCl at High Pressure and 300 K. J. Geophys. Res. 1978, 83, 1257–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mattesini, M.; Ahuja, R.; Johansson, B. Cubic Hf3N4 and Zr3N4: A class of hard materials. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 184108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hill, R. The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. 1952, 65, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, B.; Duan, Y.H.; Sun, Y.; Peng, M.J.; Chen, S. Electronic structures, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of cubic alkaline-earth hexaborides from first principles calculations. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 635, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chouhan, S.S.; Pagare, G.; Rajagopalan, M.; Sanyal, S.P. First principles study of structural, electronic, elastic and thermal properties of YX (X = Cd, In, Au, Hg and Tl) intermetallics. Solid State Sci. 2012, 14, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ivanovskii, A.L. Mechanical and electronic properties of diborides of transition 3d–5d metals from first principles: Toward search of novel ultra-incompressible and superhard materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 184–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Teter, D.M. Computational Alchemy: The Search for New Superhard Materials. MRS Bull. 1998, 23, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wei, Z.; Bao, D.L.; Ping, L.; Duan, Y. Elastic Anisotropies and Thermal Properties of Cubic TMIr (TM = Sc, Y, Lu, Ti, Zr and Hf): A DFT Calculation. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 086574. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pugh, S.F. XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Philos. Mag. 2009, 45, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, Z.W.; Zhou, D.W.; Bai, J.P.; Lu, C.; Zhong, Z.G.; Li, G.Q. Theoretical investigation on structural and thermodynamic properties of the intermetallic compound in Mg–Zn–Ag alloy under high pressure and high temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 550, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Iota, V.; Klepeis, J.H.P.; Yoo, C.S.; Lang, J.; Srajer, G. Electronic structure and magnetism in compressed 3d transition metals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tracy, C.L.; Park, S.; Rittman, D.R.; Zinkle, S.J.; Bei, H.; Lang, M.; Ewing, R.C.; Mao, W.L. High pressure synthesis of a hexagonal close-packed phase of the high-entropy alloy CrMnFeCoNi. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 10 01102 g001
Figure 1. The energy versus volume curves of paramagnetic (PM), ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
Figure 1. The energy versus volume curves of paramagnetic (PM), ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
Crystals 10 01102 g001
Crystals 10 01102 g002
Figure 2. The isochoric heat capacity (Cv) of PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
Figure 2. The isochoric heat capacity (Cv) of PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
Crystals 10 01102 g002
Crystals 10 01102 g003
Figure 3. The enthalpy H(T), entropy contribution to free energy −TS(T) of the PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) at 20, 30 and 40 GPa.
Figure 3. The enthalpy H(T), entropy contribution to free energy −TS(T) of the PM, FM and AFM phases for L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) at 20, 30 and 40 GPa.
Crystals 10 01102 g003
Crystals 10 01102 g004
Figure 4. The Gibbs free energy G (T) of the PM, FM and AFM phases for (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) at 20, 30 and 40 GPa.
Figure 4. The Gibbs free energy G (T) of the PM, FM and AFM phases for (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) at 20, 30 and 40 GPa.
Crystals 10 01102 g004
Table 1. Calculated ground state and elastic properties of PM, FM and AFM phases of (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
Table 1. Calculated ground state and elastic properties of PM, FM and AFM phases of (Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr).
C11C12C44BGEvG/BC12−C44
PM213.7166.4118.3182.280.5210.40.3080.4448.1
FM187.8141.5118.9156.985.6206.40.2810.5522.6
AFM193.9148.1128.0163.486.0219.40.2760.5220.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, L.; Wang, Z.-P.; Huang, G.-H.; Huang, J.-L.; Tang, P.-Y.; Fan, T.-W. Magnetic Phase Transition, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d High-Entropy Alloys. Crystals 2020, 10, 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121102

AMA Style

Ma L, Wang Z-P, Huang G-H, Huang J-L, Tang P-Y, Fan T-W. Magnetic Phase Transition, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d High-Entropy Alloys. Crystals. 2020; 10(12):1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121102

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Li, Zhi-Peng Wang, Guo-Hua Huang, Jin-Li Huang, Ping-Ying Tang, and Tou-Wen Fan. 2020. "Magnetic Phase Transition, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d High-Entropy Alloys" Crystals 10, no. 12: 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121102

APA Style

Ma, L., Wang, Z.-P., Huang, G.-H., Huang, J.-L., Tang, P.-Y., & Fan, T.-W. (2020). Magnetic Phase Transition, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of L12-(Ni,Cu)3(Al,Fe,Cr) in 3d High-Entropy Alloys. Crystals, 10(12), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121102

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop