Next Article in Journal
Recent Progress in Materials Design and Fabrication Techniques for Membrane Electrode Assembly in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Supported TiO2 Photocatalysis of Spiked Contaminants in Water and Municipal Wastewater
Previous Article in Journal
Palladium-Catalyzed Cascade Reactions for Synthesis of Heterocycles Initiated by C(sp3)–H Functionalization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Application of Highly Efficient Self-Cleaning Coating g-C3N4/MoS2@PDMS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photocatalytic NO Removal by Ternary Composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 Using a Waste Reutilization Strategy

1
School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2
School of Intelligent Emergency Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
3
Shanghai Environmental Monitoring Center, Shanghai 200235, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010073
Submission received: 10 November 2024 / Revised: 23 December 2024 / Accepted: 30 December 2024 / Published: 14 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Photocatalysis for Environmental Applications)

Abstract

:
Heterojunction creation is demonstrated as an effective strategy to enhance the transfer and separation of charge carriers, which is beneficial for subsequent photocatalytic reactions. In this study, “sea urchin-like” W18O49 was in situ-grown on the surface of Bi12GeO20 through a hydrothermal process, and the released Cl anions tended to produce BiOCl simultaneously. Systematical characterizations confirmed the construction of ternary composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 (GBW), in which Type I and Z-scheme models were integrated to promote charge carrier migration and separation by combining the structural merits of both models. Under UV–visible light, the catalytic performance of the as-synthesized samples was tested in terms of NO oxidation removal. Compared to pure Bi12GeO20, the composite GBW5 showed the highest NO photocatalytic removal efficiency of 42%, which was nearly four times that of pure Bi12GeO20. These improvements were mainly due to enhanced light absorption, suitable morphological features, effective separation of charge carriers, and the boosted generation of reactive species in the GBW series. This study paves the way for the construction of Bi12GeO20-based ternary composites using a comprehensive utilization of waste method and the employment of the composites for the photocatalytic removal of low concentrations of NO at the ppb level.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rapid industrialization and technological advancement are often accompanied by environmental pollution and energy consumption. After being emitted into the atmosphere, nitrogen oxides (NOx, with NO as the major component) not only cause profound ecological damage but also pose threats to human health, leading to disasters such as acid rain and photochemical smog [1,2,3], as well as respiratory diseases upon inhalation [4,5]. NO at high concentrations readily oxidizes to the more toxic NO2 in the atmosphere [1,6,7] and can be treated by conventional technologies [8,9,10]. However, these treatments suffer from high energy consumption, complicated equipment, and secondary pollution generation, and are, therefore, cost-ineffective for treating NOx with low concentration and flow rate. In this context, photocatalysis emerges as a green, energy-efficient [11,12,13], and sustainable technology of research significance [14,15,16]. Under ambient conditions, it harnesses solar energy to generate reactive charge carriers and abundant radicals to eliminate toxic compounds [17]. Specifically, the oxidation of NO molecules occurs on the surface of catalysts to form N O 2 or N O 3 species that are converted to metabolic forms and further adsorbed by crops, which facilitates waste utilization and circulation [18,19,20]. Therefore, the fabrication of an efficient photocatalytic system to remove NO is an important challenge [21,22]. In particular, the preparation of catalysts via waste reuse strategies generally provides more comprehensive support for NOx removal research [23,24].
The semiconductor Bi12GeO20 exhibits unique optical and physicochemical properties, offering great potential for applications in photonic excitation, holographic imaging, optoelectronics, piezoelectrics, spatial light modulation, and photocatalysis [25,26,27]. However, its wide bandgap, slow charge kinetics, severe recombination of charge carriers, and poor visible light absorption greatly constrain its photocatalytic activity. Some modification strategies have been explored to enhance its photocatalytic capacity, such as morphological modulation [28], ion doping [29], carbonaceous material decoration [30], noble metal deposition [31], and heterojunction construction [32]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few reports on the modification of Bi12GeO20 for photocatalytic NO removal, suggesting considerable opportunities for further research in this area. The incorporation of another component with a narrow bandgap favors the absorption of visible light and redistribution of charge carriers in different phases, thus facilitating the enhancement of photocatalytic performance. In this context, tungsten oxide W18O49 is considered a fascinating candidate, possessing abundant oxygen vacancies and impressive absorption characteristics in the visible and near-infrared regions. In addition, the one-dimensional structure of W18O49 nanowires facilitates efficient long-distance electron transfer and sustained photocatalytic stability [33]. Moreover, W18O49 is able to generate high-energy hot electrons for N2 reduction through the localized surface plasmon resonance effect [34]. Therefore, W18O49 with favorable physiochemical and optical merits has typically been selected to establish heterojunction composites for efficient NO removal.
During composite preparation, the dissociation of reagents provides anions and cations, which may produce different components under suitable conditions. Such processes fully utilize all species in reagents and avoid introducing external ions, thus providing an opportunity to generate heterojunction composites in a green and cost-effective manner. For this purpose, the reagent WCl6 was adopted to produce W18O49, and the released Cl anions react with bismuth cations in Bi12GeO20 lattices to generate BiOCl in situ. The obtained BiOCl, composed of {Bi2O2}2+ and Cl layers arranged in a cross pattern, possesses a unique structure that expands internal space and generates an intrinsic electric field. The combined effects of internal polarization due to intrinsic magnetism and the electronegativity differences among Bi, O, and Cl facilitate the effective separation of charge carriers, thereby enhancing photocatalytic activity under ultraviolet irradiation [35,36]. As a result, these components tend to form heterojunction structures in ternary composites in situ, by which charge carriers can be further regulated and separated and photocatalytic performance may be accordingly enhanced. Moreover, the combination of Type I and Z-scheme models facilitates the migration and separation of charge carriers with relatively strong redox potentials [37,38,39], which may produce more active species to efficiently photocatalytically remove NO at low concentrations.
In this study, a series of ternary composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 were successfully fabricated using a hydrothermal method and comprehensively characterized by using various analytical techniques. Under UV–visible light irradiation, these GBW composites were able to photocatalytically remove NO at the ppb level. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was mainly related to suitable morphologies, enhanced light absorption, strengthened separation of charge carriers, and boosted generation of reactive species. According to experimental and analytical results, the photocatalysis mechanism was proposed to be the integration of Type I and Z-scheme models in obtained composites with sufficient structural stability.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Microstructural and Morphological Characterization

The phase composition and crystal structures of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl, and GBW series were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), as shown in Figure 1A. The diffraction signals at 2θ = 21.3°, 24.7°, 27.7°, 30.4°, 32.9°, 35.3°, 37.5°, 39.6°, 41.7°, 43.6°, 45.5°, 49.1°, 52.5°, 54.1°, 55.7°, and 61.9° in the XRD pattern of Bi12GeO20 correspond well to the (211), (220), (310), (222), (321), (400), (411), (024), (332), (422), (134), (125), (035), (600), (532), and (631) crystal planes of tetragonal Bi12GeO20 (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, JCPDS File NO. 77-0861) [27], respectively. The XRD pattern of W18O49 is in good accordance with the monoclinic phase (JCPDS File NO. 05–0392) [33]. However, diffraction peaks of W18O49 are unobservable in GBW composites, mainly due to their trace amount and uniform distribution. However, some extra peaks emerged in the composite GBW3 and became enhanced with an increase in WCl6 addition. By comparison, these extra peaks are derived from the tetragonal matlockite BiOCl phase (JCPDS File NO. 06-0249) [35]. For further identification, NaCl was adopted as the Cl source to replace WCl6 to produce a series of binary composites GB that clearly includes diffraction peaks from both components Bi12GeO20 and BiOCl, as shown in Figure S2. Therefore, during the synthesis of W18O49, the component BiOCl was simultaneously produced by combining Bi3+ cations on the surface of Bi12GeO20 and Cl anions from WCl6, fully utilizing the different species contained. The other different structural parameters were investigated by using XRD patterns, which included lattice parameters, c/a ratio, density ρ (g/cm3), and unit cell volume ν (Å3) [40,41]. For Bi12GeO20: a = 10.153, b = 10.153, c = 10.153, α = 90.00, β = 90.00, c/a = 1.000, volume ν = 1046.6, density ρ = 9.201. For W18O49: a = 18.318, b = 3.783, c = 14.028, α = 90.00, β = 115.21, c/a = 0.766, volume ν = 879.5, and density ρ = 7.727.
The chemical composition and surface valence states of Bi12GeO20 and composite GBW5 were analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full-scan spectrum in Figure 1B confirms the presence of Bi, Ge, and O in both samples. In addition, the spectrum of GBW5 shows a distinct signal for W, with an atomic percentage of tungsten measured at 5.3%, which is consistent with the theoretical value of 5%. This confirms the successful incorporation of tungsten into the composites. To further distinguish the valence states of each element, high-resolution (HR) XPS spectra of Bi 4f, Ge 3d, O 1s, W 4f, and Cl 2p are exhibited in Figure 1C–F and Figure S3. In Figure 1C, the peaks at 159.5 and 164.8 eV in Bi12GeO20 and 159.4 and 164.7 eV in composite GBW5, respectively, correspond to the Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2 orbitals [42]. The Bi 5d and Ge 3d signals at 25.7 and 28.8 eV in Bi12GeO20 can be seen in Figure 1D, and slightly shift to 25.6 eV and 28.7 eV in composite GBW5, confirming the presence of Bi3+ and Ge4+ cations in both samples. As to the O 1s spectra in Figure 1E, signals positioned at 529.3, 530.3 eV, and 531.5 eV in Bi12GeO20 respectively attribute to Ge–O bonds, Bi–O bonds, and adsorbed surface oxygen species. In addition, Figure 1F displays characteristic signals at 35.9 and 37.9 eV that correspond to the W 4f7/2 and W 4f5/2 orbitals, respectively. Figure S3 shows the characteristic signals at 198.2 and 199.7 eV, corresponding to the Cl 2p3/2 and Cl 2p1/2 orbitals, respectively. Compared with Bi12GeO20, the signal peaks of Bi 4f and Ge 3d in the GBW5 composite have shifted downfield, indicating a certain degree of electron transfer and migration to Bi12GeO20 [43], which further benefits the photocatalytic processes [44].
The microstructures and morphologies of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and composite GBW5 were thoroughly examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The tetragonal-phased Bi12GeO20 exhibits an accumulation of regular large and incomplete small triangular pyramids of several micrometers in Figure 2A and Figure S4A. As shown in Figure 2B and Figure S4B, the W18O49 presents sea urchin-like spheres that are accumulated by numerous nanosheets. The composite GBW5 shows the morphology of nanosheets from sea urchin-like spheres covering the surface of triangular pyramids in Figure 2C and Figure S4C, which reveals the coexistence of both Bi12GeO20 and W18O49 components and facilitates reflection of incident light and mass transfer of reactants and products, thus improving photocatalytic outcomes. Unfortunately, it is difficult to see any BiOCl, which generally presents as lamellar structures, similar to that of W18O49. To this end, the elemental distribution of composite GBW5 was measured at the selected area in Figure S4D and the presence of Bi, Ge, O, W, and Cl is obviously confirmed in Figure S4E–I, corroborating the successful generation of ternary heterojunction composites. Furthermore, the SEM image of composite GB5 in Figure 2D and Figure S4J shows triangular pyramids with a rough surface and some small flakes adhered to them, in contrast to that of Bi12GeO20. The produced BiOCl phase exists as small flakes or particles closely attached to the surface of the Bi12GeO20, which can be identified from the elemental mapping images shown in Figure S4K–O. TEM and HRTEM images were employed to further investigate the morphologies and microstructures of relevant samples. The TEM image of composite GBW5 in Figure 2E reveals a sea urchin-like morphology including a bulky structure covered with numerous nanosheets, which is in good accordance with the SEM image in Figure 2C. In addition, some small particles attached to the surface among the nanosheets are observed. This area is framed by a red elliptical ring and was the target for high-resolution TEM analysis. Significantly, three kinds of well-defined lattice fringes are observable in Figure 2F. Lattice fringes in the bulky phase with a lattice spacing of approximately 0.27 nm correspond to the (321) crystal planes of Bi12GeO20. In addition, lattice fringes on nanosheets with lattice spacing of approximately 0.37 nm belong to the (010) crystal planes of W18O49, and other lattice fringes with lattice spacing of 0.32 nm belong to (110) crystal planes of BiOCl. This close contact of three kinds of components indicates the formation of the target composites, which can steer and redistribute charge carriers to promote photocatalytic reactions [45].
Ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–Vis DRS) was utilized to assess the optical properties and bandgap structures of the semiconductors. BiOCl in white shows strong adsorption in the ultraviolet region because of the wide bandgap shown in Figure 3A. Pristine Bi12GeO20 in light yellow exhibits an intensive absorption ranging from 200 to 500 nm, indicating a moderate response in the visible region. However, W18O49 in navy blue demonstrates a significant absorption in both the ultraviolet and visible regions, mainly owing to the suitable band structure with the localized surface plasmon resonance effect. As the W18O49 content of the composites increases, the absorption edge of the GBW composite progressively shifts toward shorter wavelengths, which is primarily attributed to the formation of heterojunction structures. From Figure 3A, the adsorption in the near-infrared region of composites is unable to induce variations in the photocatalytic performance, mainly due to insufficient incident energy. Instead, other effects, such as the dosage of the introduced catalyst [46], greatly affect photocatalytic outcomes. Figure S5 shows the UV–Vis DRS spectra of composites synthesized using NaCl as the chlorine source. Significantly, the absorption edge of these composites remains almost unchanged.
According to the calculations in Figure S6A–C, it was found that Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl follow an indirect transition, with the value n as 4. The bandgap (Eg) of semiconductor-based samples can be computed from the equation αhν = A(hν − Eg)n/2, where α, A, h, and ν represent the absorption coefficient, a constant, Planck’s constant, and optical frequency, respectively. As shown in Figure 3B,C, the values of Eg of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl are determined to be 2.70, 2.76, and 3.26 eV, respectively. In Figure S7, the (ahv)1/2 vs hv plots for the GBW series of samples reveal that the values of Eg gradually increase with increasing W18O49 content. Accordingly, the value of Eg of composite GBW5 is measured at 2.79 eV. It is well known that Eg refers to the energy required to excite electrons from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) in a semiconductor. The reduction in Eg in composite GBW5 facilitates visible light absorption, the generation of charge carriers, and further photocatalytic reactions.
The band structures of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl were inferred through flat-band potentials (Efb) on an electrochemical workstation. The Mott–Schottky plots of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl are shown in Figure 3D–F, respectively. Usually, the type of semiconductor can be determined by analyzing the slope of the straight-line section, with a negative or positive slope indicating p-type or n-type characteristics, respectively. Clearly, the positive slopes in the linear regions in three samples suggest an n-type nature, and the slopes of Bi12GeO20 and BiOCl are smaller than that of W18O49, revealing the large charge carrier concentration and better photocatalytic performance [47]. The intersections with the x-axis and the straight-line section can allow values of Efb for Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl to be approximated as −0.38, −0.04, and −0.51 V (vs. saturated calomel electrode, SCE), respectively. By using the correction of 0.24 V, Efb values are calculated as −0.14, 0.20, and −0.27 V (vs. normal hydrogen electrode, NHE) for Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl, respectively. According to the characteristics of n-type semiconductors, their potentials of conduction band bottom (ECB) are generally about 0.1–0.3 V higher than Efb values. Herein, a median value of 0.2 V is chosen for calculation, and resultant values of ECB of −0.34, 0, and −0.47 V are calculated for Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl, respectively. Considering Eg values for Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl, the potentials of the valence band top (EVB) can be calculated to be 2.36, 2.76, and 2.79 V, respectively, using the formula ECB = EVB − Eg [48].

2.2. Photocatalytic NO Removal Performance

Photocatalytic NO removal efficiencies were measured by placing catalysts in a reactor with continuously flowing NO gas under UV–visible irradiation. To ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of results, each experiment was conducted at least three times in parallel to provide average data with error bars. Prior to the experiments, the effect of relative humidity in the reactor over NO removal was assessed in the presence of composite GBW5, as shown in Figure S8. Obviously, the NO removal efficiency at 50% relative humidity is approximately 20% higher than those at 25% and 75% relative humidity. Accordingly, 50% relative humidity was chosen for subsequent experiments.
The photocatalytic performance on NO removal by Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and the GBW series is depicted in Figure 4A. Both Bi12GeO20 and BiOCl exhibit weak removal efficiencies of around 10% after 30 min of light exposure, while W18O49 exhibits negligible catalytic activity under identical conditions. As for the GBW composites, their removal efficiencies increase greatly and achieve peak values after 5 min. In addition, the peak values can be maintained for up to 30 min, revealing the satisfactory stability of catalytic capacity. Moreover, with increasing WCl6 addition, the photocatalytic performance of the GBW series first increases and then reduces. As a result, the composite GBW5 with a suitable composition exhibits the best removal efficiency of around 42%, which is significantly higher than those of pure Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl. The trend in photocatalytic removal of NOx (including NO and NO2) under UV–visible light for different samples shown in Figure S9A shows the same behavior as for the NO removal shown in Figure 4A. However, GBW composites cause a slight increase in NO2 production in comparison to pure Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and BiOCl, as shown in Figure S9B, which is unexpected since NO2 molecules are more toxic than NO. For a comprehensive evaluation of NOx elimination, both the NO removal and NO2 generation should be considered by using the DeNOx index. The larger the DeNOx index, the better the photocatalytic performance. Significantly, as shown in Figure 4B, the DeNOx index of GBW5 is the largest among all values by the different candidates, revealing the best overall efficiency among all as-synthesized samples. In order to confirm the generation of nitrate (NO3) and nitrite (NO2) species during the photocatalytic processes, XPS spectra of composite GBW5 stirred for 1 h in an aqueous solution containing NaNO3 and NaNO2 and after five consecutive runs (150 min) were recorded. As shown in Figure S10, signals at 403.2 and 407.3 eV are both clearly visible in the spectra for GBW5 stirred for 1 h in an aqueous solution, assigned to NO2 and NO3 adsorbed on the surface, respectively. A distinct signal at 406.7 eV is observed in GBW5 after a reaction of 150 min, indicating the formation of NO3 species during the reaction. The absence of another signal indexed to NO2 is possibly attributed to its instability and ease of converting to stable NO3. Generally, the apparent reaction kinetics constant (Kapp) of catalyst processes can be calculated from the pseudo-first-order kinetic as shown in Figure S11 and Figure 4C. As can be seen, the composite GBW5 has the largest Kapp value at 67.83 × 10−3 min−1, which is about 3.7 and 24 times those of Bi12GeO20 and W18O49, respectively. From the aforementioned experimental results, the GBW ternary heterojunction composites exhibit visibly improved photocatalytic capacity in comparison to the individual materials. As shown in Figure S12, the photocatalytic NO removal and NO2 generation with the binary composites GB are slightly better than those with pure Bi12GeO20 and BiOCl but nowhere near as good as those with the GBW series, revealing the synergistic effect of integrating three components with the appropriate composition. On the whole, our catalyst system provides comparable and even better removal efficiencies in comparison to recent relevant reports, which are collected in Table S2 [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
The transfer and segregation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers can be assessed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and transient photocurrent measurements, which directly relate to the photocatalytic performance of the catalysts. The EIS Nyquist plots demonstrate the interfacial impedance between electrode and electrolyte, where a smaller radius means a weaker charge transfer resistance. The Nyquist plots of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl, and composite GBW5 are shown in Figure 4D. Clearly, the arc radii of relevant samples change in an order of GBW5 < BiOCl < Bi12GeO20 < W18O49 with the corresponding fitted data collected in Table S1, which is in good agreement with the trend in photocatalytic capacity. The intensity of the transient photocurrent indicates the transfer rate of photogenerated carriers under illumination. As shown in Figure 4E, composite GBW5 demonstrates the highest steady-state photocurrent response, far exceeding those of other samples, revealing the highly efficient migration and segregation efficiency of ternary heterojunction systems arising from the integration of the structural merits of the three components.
Five repeated photocatalytic experiments were conducted to estimate the recycling capability and structural stability of the as-synthesized composites. The first four experiments were consecutively carried out without interruption, the used GBW5 was then washed three times each with water and ethanol before being subjected to the fifth cycle. As shown in Figure 4F, photocatalytic performance remains high with only a slight reduction after four cycles and can be restored in the fifth cycle after simply washing. During photocatalytic processes, NO2 generation remains approximately invariant, as shown in Figure 4G. These results confirm the impressive reusability of the composite. In addition, the XRD patterns of GBW5 before and after five cycles are identical, suggesting good maintenance of the composite and crystal structure, which indicates the sufficient structural stability of these robust samples.
By conducting capture experiments, the reactive species that contribute to photocatalytic processes can be identified. As depicted in Figure 5A, the photocatalytic removal efficiency of GBW5 is greatly inhibited after the addition of reagents KI, PBQ, TBA, or K2CrO7, confirming the crucial roles of species h+, e, ·O2, and ·OH. The generation of ·OH radicals can be directly detected by fluorescence spectroscopy (PL). After light exposure for 30 min, intensive bands centered at 425 nm appear, as shown in Figure 5B, verifying the formation of ·OH radicals in the presence of both Bi12GeO20 and GBW5. Moreover, the fluorescence signal intensity of GBW5 is higher than that of Bi12GeO20, indicating the boosted generation of ·OH radicals due to the strong oxidative capability of these ternary composites. To further detect the formation ·OH and ·O2 radicals, electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements were performed. The typical signals of DMPO-·OH adducts in the spectra of both Bi12GeO20 and composite GBW5 are visible in Figure 5C. Neither Bi12GeO20 nor GBW5 causes the generation of ·OH radicals in the dark. In contrast, evident ESR signals in the spectra of both samples can be found after 10 min of light irradiation, revealing the possible formation of ·OH radicals upon illumination. Moreover, the stronger ESR signals generated with GBW5 compared to those generated with Bi12GeO20 suggest the strengthened production of ·OH radicals because of efficient regulation of interfacial charge carriers in ternary composites. Similar results are found for the appearance of DMPO-·O2 signals in methanol under light illumination in Figure 5D, revealing that more ·O radicals can be produced by GBW5 than by Bi12GeO20. Although the GBW5 and Bi12GeO20 catalytic systems are both able to induce the production of ·OH and ·O2 radicals, the synergistic effect represented by the ternary composites is favorable for the formation of sufficient radicals, thus enhancing photocatalytic NO removal performance [48].
Based on the experimental and analytical results described above, a probable mechanism for photocatalytic NO removal using the GBW composites is proposed in Figure 6. As described, W18O49 and BiOCl phases are generated on the surface of Bi12GeO20, thus the relative position of the three components with relevant band structures is exhibited on the left side of the diagram. The production of a BiOCl phase on the surface of Bi12GeO20 through the comprehensive utilization of “waste” Cl anions may form a heterojunction structure that regulates interfacial charge carriers. In addition, the presence of W18O49 nanosheets is capable of enhancing visible light absorption and promoting the separation of charge carriers. As a result, a synergistic effect is formed at the interface between the three components. Under ultraviolet–visible light, the three components are excited and distribute electrons to the CB and holes to the VB. BiOCl possesses a more negative CB and positive VB than Bi12GeO20, thus, electrons and holes from BiOCl tend to thermodynamically transfer to Bi12GeO20. Because of the faster transfer rate of e than h+, more electrons accumulate in the CB of Bi12GeO20 as revealed by XPS analyses and more holes remain in the VB of BiOCl, thus causing efficient segregation efficiency through a Type I scheme. Subsequently, holes in the VB of Bi12GeO20 can recombine with electrons on Bi12GeO20 and holes on W18O49 through a Z-scheme model. Accordingly, electrons easily convert to ·O2 radical because of the more negative CB potential of Bi12GeO20 (0.34 V) than the potential (O2/·O2, −0.33 V), and holes readily convert to ·OH radicals because of more positive VB potentials of BiOCl (2.79 V) and W18O49 (2.76 V) than potentials (OH/·OH, 1.99 V) and (H2O/·OH, 2.27 V), which can be confirmed by the entrapping experiments, PL spectra, and ESR spectra in Figure 5. As a result, the combination of both Type I and Z-scheme transfer models effectively suppresses the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, prolongs the lifetimes of charge carriers, and enhances the light-responsive capability, thus facilitating the improvement of photocatalytic NO removal efficiencies of the GBW ternary heterojunction composites.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalysts Fabrication

Detailed information on the reagents used in this study can be found in the Supplementary Materials. The original Bi12GeO20 was simply prepared by a solvothermal method. Typically, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (2.91 g, 6 mmol) was dispersed in a NaOH solution (5 M, 35 mL), and the mixture was stirred magnetically until the color turned to light yellow. Subsequently, GeO2 (0.05 g, 0.5 mmol) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (0.25 g, 0.7 mmol) were added to the solution to make a mixture that was vigorously stirred for 30 min. The resultant mixture was then transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave. After heating at 180 °C for 12 h, the suspension was centrifuged, washed three times with water and ethanol, and then dried at 60 °C for 8 h to obtain pristine Bi12GeO20. W18O49 was synthesized using WCl6 as the tungsten source and anhydrous ethanol as the solvent through a solvothermal method [33].
The ternary composites were fabricated by a post-synthesis protocol, where the as-synthesized Bi12GeO20 was added during the preparation of W18O49. Typically, the required amount of WCl6 (0.065 g, 0.108 g, 0.151 g) was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (40 mL) to produce a mixture that was stirred until the yellow solution turned colorless. Afterward, Bi12GeO20 (1 g) was added and the resultant suspension was magnetically stirred for 30 min, followed by ultrasonic treatment for another 30 min. The mixture was then transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 160 °C for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed three times with water and alcohol, and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 6 h. These obtained composites were labeled GBW3, GBW5, and GBW7 according to the mass ratio of elemental W to Bi12GeO20. During the aforementioned procedure, BiOCl was also synthesized by a solvothermal method as follows. Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (0.97 g, 2 mmol) in ethylene glycol (76 mL) and NaCl (0.234 g, 4 mmol) in water (5 mL) were mixed to gain a mixture that was stirred for 30 min and then left to stand at 140 °C for 5 h to supply BiOCl. Binary composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl were synthesized using a similar procedure to that of the ternary composites, except that WCl6 was replaced by NaCl as the chlorine source, based on moles of Cl element. The syntheszied composites were labeled GB3, GB5, and GB7. The schematic diagram of the synthetic procedure of the as-synthesized samples is shown in Figure S1.
The microstructural analyses and relevant instruments are listed in the Supplementary Materials for clarity.

3.2. Photocatalytic NO Removal and Entrapping Experiments

The specific procedure for the photocatalytic NO removal and recycling experiments are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Entrapping experiments were conducted to identify the reactive species that played roles during photocatalytic NO removal. To that end, a reagent such as KI (0.1 g), tert-butanol (TBA, 0.1 mM), p-benzoquinone (PBQ, 0.1 g), or potassium dichromate (K2CrO7, 0.1 g) was introduced into the photocatalytic systems to trap holes (h+), hydroxyl radicals (∙OH), superoxide radicals (∙O2), or e, respectively. The procedure was the same as that used for photocatalytic NO removal. The active species ∙OH and ∙O2 captured by 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidone hydrochloride (TEMP) were detected using electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy. ∙OH radicals entrapped by terephthalic acid were detected using an F96Pro spectrophotometer (Shanghai Lengguang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

4. Conclusions

In this investigation, the integration of “sea urchin-like” W18O49 and BiOCl by comprehensively utilizing all ions in precursor WCl6 was successfully completed on the surface of Bi12GeO20, leading to the generation of ternary composites, designated GBW. These as-prepared composites were thoroughly analyzed by various techniques and subjected to photocatalytic NO removal evaluation. Consistent with expectations, these ternary composites showed enhanced photocatalytic performance under UV–visible irradiation. Among all tested samples, the composite GBW5 showed the highest NO photocatalytic removal efficiency of 42%, which was nearly four times that of pure Bi12GeO20. In addition, it possessed the largest Kapp value and DeNOx index, which was mainly attributed to enhanced light absorption, suitable morphological features, effective separation of charge carriers, and boosted generation of reactive species. Based on the analytical and experimental results, the robust GBW composites underwent a combination of both Type I and Z-scheme transfer, by which charge carriers could efficiently migrate and be segregated. This study paves the way for the construction of Bi12GeO20-based ternary composites using a comprehensive utilization of waste matter and their employment for the photocatalytic removal of low concentrations of NO at the ppb level.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal15010073/s1, Figure S1: Graphical illustration of synthetic procedure for target composites; Figure S2: XRD patterns of Bi12GeO20, BiOCl, and the GB series; Figure S3: XPS spectrum of Cl 2p in GBW5; Figure S4: SEM images of Bi12GeO20 (A), W18O49 (B), and GBW5 (C); EDS elemental mapping of total (D), and Bi (E), Ge (F), O (G), W (H), and Cl (I) elements; SEM images of GB5 (J) and EDS elemental mapping of GB5 (L–O) from the selected area in SEM image of GB5 (K); Figure S5: UV–visible DRS spectra of Bi12GeO20 and GB series; Figure S6: Estimation of n for Bi12GeO20 (A), W18O49 (B), and BiOCl (C); Figure S7: Estimation of Eg for GBW series; Figure S8: Photocatalytic NO removal by GBW5 at different relative humidities; Figure S9: Photocatalytic NOₓ removal (A) and NO2 production (B) by various samples; Figure S10: Corresponding pseudo-first-order curves of various samples; Figure S10: XPS spectra of composite GBW5 treated with a solution containing NO2 and NO3 anions and after five photocatalytic runs; Figure S11: Corresponding pseudo-first-order curves of various samples; Figure S12: Photocatalytic NO removal (A) and NO2 production efficiency (B) by Bi12GeO20, BiOCl, and GB series; Table S1: Correlation fitting parameters of EIS spectra of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl, and GBW5; Table S2: Comparison of photocatalytic performance of previous reports and our work. References [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Supervision and funding acquisition, F.C.; Writing—original draft preparation and Investigation, W.B.; Investigation, J.L.; Investigation, Z.Z.; Writing—review and editing, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation, grant number 17ZR1419200. This research has also received financial support form the National Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number 2024YFE0211700.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, N.; Wang, C.; Zhang, K.; Lv, H.; Yuan, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Progress and Prospects of Photocatalytic Conversion of Low-Concentration NO. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 2363–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, Y.; Chen, M.; Jiang, L.; Cao, J.; Li, H.; Lee, S.C.; Huang, Y. Oxygen Vacancy Engineering of Photocatalytic Nanomaterials for Enrichment, Activation, and Efficient Removal of Nitrogen Oxides with High Selectivity: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 3905–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, C.; Wei, J.; Jiang, K.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Yang, X.; Yu, G.; Zhang, C.; Li, X. Typical Layered Structure Bismuth-Based Photocatalysts for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Oxides Oxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 855, 158644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lelieveld, J.; Pöschl, U. Chemists Can Help to Solve the Air-Pollution Health Crisis. Nature 2017, 551, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Tian, S.; Tang, G.; Gao, W.; Ji, D.; Song, T.; et al. Redefining the Importance of Nitrate during Haze Pollution to Help Optimize an Emission Control Strategy. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 141, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Binas, V.; Venieri, D.; Kotzias, D.; Kiriakidis, G. Modified TiO2 Based Photocatalysts for Improved Air and Health Quality. J. Mater. 2017, 3, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Serpone, N. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis and Prospects of TiO2-Based Photocatalytic DeNOxing the Atmospheric Environment. Catalysts 2018, 8, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deorsola, F.A.; Andreoli, S.; Armandi, M.; Bonelli, B.; Pirone, R. Unsupported Nanostructured Mn Oxides Obtained by Solution Combustion Synthesis: Textural and Surface Properties, and Catalytic Performance in NOx SCR at Low Temperature. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 522, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, M.-Z.; Ling, T.-C.; Poon, C.S. Highly-Efficient Green Photocatalytic Cementitious Materials with Robust Weathering Resistance: From Laboratory to Application. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 273, 116510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, W.; Gao, X.; Deng, Y.; Qu, R.; Zheng, C.; Zhu, X.; Cen, K. Deactivation Mechanism of Arsenic and Resistance Effect of SO42− on Commercial Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 293, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Fei, Y.; Li, Z.; Xie, H.; Yang, M. Iron Mediated n → Π* Electron Transitions and Mid-Gap States Formation in CN under Low-Temperature Secondary Calcination Enhances Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 357, 130223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, X.; Cui, W.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Dong, F. Promoting Ring-Opening Efficiency for Suppressing Toxic Intermediates during Photocatalytic Toluene Degradation via Surface Oxygen Vacancies. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bai, Y.; Hu, X.; Tian, T.; Cai, B.; Li, Y. Carbon Pre-Protected Iron Strategy to Construct Fe, C-Codoped g-C3N4 for Effective Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants via Hole Oxidation Mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 437, 140739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fragoso, J.; Barreca, D.; Bigiani, L.; Gasparotto, A.; Sada, C.; Lebedev, O.I.; Modin, E.; Pavlovic, I.; Sánchez, L.; Maccato, C. Enhanced Photocatalytic Removal of NOx Gases by β-Fe2O3/CuO and β-Fe2O3/WO3 Nanoheterostructures. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, K.; Zhou, W.; Li, X.; Li, Q.; Carabineiro, S.A.C.; Zhang, S.; Fan, J.; Lv, K. Synergistic Effect of Cyano Defects and CaCO3 in Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic NO Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maggos, T.; Bartzis, J.G.; Leva, P.; Kotzias, D. Application of Photocatalytic Technology for NOx Removal. Appl. Phys. A 2007, 89, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, Z.; Lee, S.C.; Dong, F. Unraveling the Mechanisms of Visible Light Photocatalytic NO Purification on Earth-Abundant Insulator-Based Core–Shell Heterojunctions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lasek, J.; Yu, Y.-H.; Wu, J.C.S. Removal of NOx by Photocatalytic Processes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2013, 14, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leson, G.; Winer, A.M. Biofiltration: An Innovative Air Pollution Control Technology For VOC Emissions. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1991, 41, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Popp, D. International Innovation and Diffusion of Air Pollution Control Technologies: The Effects of NOX and SO2 Regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2006, 51, 46–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rao, F.; An, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhu, L.; Gong, S.; Shi, X.; Lu, J.; Gao, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; et al. “X-Scheme” Charge Separation Induced by Asymmetrical Localized Electronic Band Structures at the Ceria Oxide Facet Junction. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 2523–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Li, K.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Dong, F. Photochemical Transformation Pathways of Nitrates from Photocatalytic NOx Oxidation: Implications for Controlling Secondary Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2021, 8, 873–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kuppusamy, M.; Kim, S.-W.; Lee, K.-P.; Jo, Y.J.; Kim, W.-J. Development of TiO2–CaCO3 Based Composites as an Affordable Building Material for the Photocatalytic Abatement of Hazardous NOx from the Environment. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuppusamy, M.; Passi, M.; Sundaram, S.K.; Vadivel, G.; Rathinasamy, M.; Lee, K.-P.; Kim, W.-J. Synergistic Effect of Li, La Co-Doping on Photocatalytic Activity of BaTiO3 Ferroelectric Material for Effective Degradation of Toxic NOx for Environmental Remediation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cremades, A.; Santos, M.T.; Remón, A.; García, J.A.; Diéguez, E.; Piqueras, J. Cathodoluminescence and Photoluminescence in the Core Region of Bi12GeO20 and Bi12SiO20 Crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 7186–7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Mello, A.C.S.; Santana, G.C.; Jackson, R.A.; Macedo, Z.S.; Moreira, S.G.C.; Valerio, M.E.G. Optical Properties of Pure and Cr3+ Doped BGO Ceramic Scintillators. Phys. Status Solidi (c) 2007, 4, 980–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moraes, C.G.P.; Jesus, F.A.A.; Macedo, Z.S. Electrical and Dielectric Characterization of Bi12GeO20 Prepared by Modified Pechini Method. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2014, 2014, 968349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wan, Z.; Zhang, G. Controlled Synthesis and Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Bi12GeO20 Uniform Microcrystals. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Fang, J.; Lu, S.; Cen, C.; Cheng, C.; Ren, L.; Feng, W.; Fang, Z. Hydrothermal Synthesis of a Ba and Mg Co-Doped Bi12GeO20 Photocatalyst with Enhanced Visible Light Catalytic Activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 15745–15752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wan, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wu, X.; Yin, S. Novel Visible-Light-Driven Z-Scheme Bi12GeO20/g-C3N4 Photocatalyst: Oxygen-Induced Pathway of Organic Pollutants Degradation and Proton Assisted Electron Transfer Mechanism of Cr(VI) Reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 207, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chang, F.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Peng, S.; Hu, X. Ag Nanoparticles-Embellished Bi12GeO20 Composites: A Plasmonic System Featured with Reinforced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Performance and Ultra-Stability. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 527, 146946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, F.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, X.; Hu, X. Fabrication of Bi12GeO20/Bi2S3 Hybrids with Surface Oxygen Vacancies by a Facile CS2Mediated Manner and Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance in Water and Saline Water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 287, 120532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, M.; Tan, G.; Dang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Ren, H.; Lv, L.; Xia, A. Dual Defects and Build-in Electric Field Mediated Direct Z-Scheme W18O49/g-C3N4−x Heterojunction for Photocatalytic NO Removal and Organic Pollutant Degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 582, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, Z.; Huang, J.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, K.; Dong, B. A Nonmetal Plasmonic Z-Scheme Photocatalyst with UV- to NIR-Driven Photocatalytic Protons Reduction. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nie, Q.; Jia, L.; Luan, J.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; Tan, Z.; Yu, H. Graphene Quantum Dots/BiOCl Visible-Light Active Photocatalyst for Degradation of NO. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 285, 119614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Mao, J.; Yin, D.; Zhang, T.; Liu, C.; Hao, W.; Wang, Y.; Hao, J. Synergy of S-Vacancy and Heterostructure in BiOCl/Bi2S3−x Boosting Room-Temperature NO2 Sensing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 455, 131591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, W.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Song, Y.; Shi, Z.; Lin, Z.; Chai, L. Different Pathways for Cr(III) Oxidation: Implications for Cr(VI) Reoccurrence in Reduced Chromite Ore Processing Residue. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 11971–11979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shan, Z.; Yang, Y.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J.; Tan, X.; Luan, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, P.; Qin, J. Hollow Dodecahedra Graphene Oxide- Cuprous Oxide Nanocomposites with Effective Photocatalytic and Bactericidal Activity. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 755836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, L.; Jiang, Z.; Yuan, B.; Zhi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, A. Ultralight and Superhydrophobic Perfluorooctyltrimethoxysilane Modified Biomass Carbonaceous Aerogel for Oil-Spill Remediation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2021, 174, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, W.; Zheng, J.; Ou, X.; Liu, X.; Song, Y.; Tian, C.; Rong, W.; Shi, Z.; Dang, Z.; Lin, Z. Effective Extraction of Cr(VI) from Hazardous Gypsum Sludge via Controlling the Phase Transformation and Chromium Species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13336–13342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nadeem, M.S.; Baoji, M.; Alam, M.M.; Riaz, N.N.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Munawar, T.; Mukhtar, F.; Rabbani, A.W.; Naz, A.; Al-Tahan, M.A.; et al. Sr-Doped ZnO Thin Film on a Silicon Substrate (100) Grown by Sol-Gel Method: Structural and Optical Study. Opt. Mater. 2024, 157, 116106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, F.; Li, J.; Kou, Y.; Bao, W.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, G.; Kong, Y. The Intense Charge Migration and Efficient Photocatalytic NO Removal of the S-Scheme Heterojunction Composites Bi7O9I3-BiOBr. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 353, 128402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chang, F.; Bao, W.; Li, K.; Bai, W.; Shi, Z.; Liu, D.; Kong, Y. Augmented Photocatalytic NO Removal by the S-Scheme Bi7O9I3/Bi2S3 Heterojunctions with Surface Oxygen Vacancies: Experimental Analyses and Theoretical Calculations. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chang, F.; Zhao, S.; Lei, Y.; Wang, X.; Dong, F.; Zhu, G.; Kong, Y. Jointly Augmented Photocatalytic NO Removal by S-Scheme Bi12SiO20/Ag2MoO4 Heterojunctions with Surface Oxygen Vacancies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 649, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, F.; Yang, C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.; Dong, F.; Zhu, G.; Kong, Y. Mechanical Ball-Milling Preparation and Superior Photocatalytic NO Elimination of Z-Scheme Bi12SiO20-Based Heterojunctions with Surface Oxygen Vacancies. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 380, 135167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Apriandanu, D.O.B.; Nakayama, S.; Shibata, K.; Amano, F. Ti-Doped Fe2O3 Photoanodes on Three-Dimensional Titanium Microfiber Felt Substrate for Photoelectrochemical Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 456, 142434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Apriandanu, D.O.B.; Surya, R.M.; Beppu, K.; Amano, F. Anion-Exchange Membrane–Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Using Porous Hematite Photoanodes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 10736–10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oliveira, T.M.; Santos, C.; Lima, A.F.; Lalic, M.V. Antisite Defect as Rule for Photorefractive, Photochromic and Photocatalytic Properties of Bi12MO20 (M = Ge, Si, Ti) Sillenite Crystals. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 720, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, W.; Wen, C.; Guan, J.; Man, H.; Bian, J. Insight on Photocatalytic Oxidation of High Concentration NO over BiOCl/Bi2WO6 under Visible Light. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 103, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, F.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Qi, Y.; Liu, D. 2D-2D Heterostructured Composites Bi4O5Br2-SnS2 with Boosted Photocatalytic NOx Abatement. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 117, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Q.; Long, H.; Chen, M.; Rao, Y.; Li, X.; Huang, Y. In Situ Construction of Biocompatible Z-Scheme α-Bi2O3/CuBi2O4 Heterojunction for NO Removal under Visible Light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 272, 119008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chang, F.; Wang, X.; Yang, C.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.; Dong, F.; Hu, X.; Liu, D.; Kong, Y. Enhanced Photocatalytic NO Removal with the Superior Selectivity for NO2/NO3 Species of Bi12GeO20-Based Composites via a Ball-Milling Treatment: Synergetic Effect of Surface Oxygen Vacancies and n-p Heterojunctions. Compos. Part B 2022, 231, 109600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huo, W.; Xu, W.; Cao, Z.; Guo, Z.; Liu, X.; Ge, G.; Li, N.; Lan, T.; Yao, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Carbonate Doped Bi2MoO6 Hierarchical Nanostructure with Enhanced Transformation of Active Radicals for Efficient Photocatalytic Removal of NO. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 557, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zha, R.; Niu, Y.; Liu, C.; He, L.; Zhang, M. Oxygen Vacancy Configuration in Confined BiVO4-Bi2S3 Heterostructures Promotes Photocatalytic Oxidation of NO. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, H.; Pan, L.; Nie, J.; Mei, H.; Zhu, G.; Jin, Z.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, L. Bi12TiO20-TiO2 S-Scheme Heterojunction for Improved Photocatalytic NO Removal: Experimental and DFT Insights. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 314, 123575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Ho, W.; Cao, J.; Shen, Z.; Lee, S. Fabrication of Bi2O2CO3/g-C3N4 Heterojunctions for Efficiently Photocatalytic NO in Air Removal: In-Situ Self-Sacrificial Synthesis, Characterizations and Mechanistic Study. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 199, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and GBW composites (A), the full-scan XPS (B) and HR spectra of Bi 4f (C), Ge 3d (D), and O 1s (E) of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5, and HR spectrum of W 4f (F) of GBW5.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, and GBW composites (A), the full-scan XPS (B) and HR spectra of Bi 4f (C), Ge 3d (D), and O 1s (E) of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5, and HR spectrum of W 4f (F) of GBW5.
Catalysts 15 00073 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of Bi12GeO20 (A), W18O49 (B), composite GBW5 (C), and GB5 (D); TEM (E) and HRTEM (F) images of GBW5.
Figure 2. SEM images of Bi12GeO20 (A), W18O49 (B), composite GBW5 (C), and GB5 (D); TEM (E) and HRTEM (F) images of GBW5.
Catalysts 15 00073 g002
Figure 3. UV–Vis DRS spectra of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl and GBW series with color in inset (A), Eg estimation of Bi12GeO20 (B), and W18O49 and BiOCl (C), Mott–Schottky plots of Bi12GeO20 (D), W18O49 (E) and BiOCl (F) measured at different frequencies.
Figure 3. UV–Vis DRS spectra of Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl and GBW series with color in inset (A), Eg estimation of Bi12GeO20 (B), and W18O49 and BiOCl (C), Mott–Schottky plots of Bi12GeO20 (D), W18O49 (E) and BiOCl (F) measured at different frequencies.
Catalysts 15 00073 g003
Figure 4. Photocatalytic NO removal under ultraviolet–visible light (A), DeNOx indexes (B), and Kapp values (C) by Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl, and GBW series, EIS spectra (D) and photocurrent transient responses (E) of relevant samples, photocatalytic NO removal (F) and generation of NO2 (G) by GBW5 for five cycles, XRD patterns of GBW5 before and after five cycles (H).
Figure 4. Photocatalytic NO removal under ultraviolet–visible light (A), DeNOx indexes (B), and Kapp values (C) by Bi12GeO20, W18O49, BiOCl, and GBW series, EIS spectra (D) and photocurrent transient responses (E) of relevant samples, photocatalytic NO removal (F) and generation of NO2 (G) by GBW5 for five cycles, XRD patterns of GBW5 before and after five cycles (H).
Catalysts 15 00073 g004
Figure 5. Photocatalytic NO removal by GBW5 in the presence of different capture reagents (A), PL spectra of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5 (B), ESR spectra of adducts DMPO-∙OH (C) and DMPO-∙O2 (D) of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5 in dark and under visible light at different time.
Figure 5. Photocatalytic NO removal by GBW5 in the presence of different capture reagents (A), PL spectra of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5 (B), ESR spectra of adducts DMPO-∙OH (C) and DMPO-∙O2 (D) of Bi12GeO20 and GBW5 in dark and under visible light at different time.
Catalysts 15 00073 g005
Figure 6. The mechanism diagram of photocatalytic NO removal by GBW composites.
Figure 6. The mechanism diagram of photocatalytic NO removal by GBW composites.
Catalysts 15 00073 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, F.; Bao, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, D. Photocatalytic NO Removal by Ternary Composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 Using a Waste Reutilization Strategy. Catalysts 2025, 15, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010073

AMA Style

Chang F, Bao W, Li J, Zhao Z, Liu D. Photocatalytic NO Removal by Ternary Composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 Using a Waste Reutilization Strategy. Catalysts. 2025; 15(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Fei, Wenlong Bao, Jiayi Li, Zhongyuan Zhao, and Dengguo Liu. 2025. "Photocatalytic NO Removal by Ternary Composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 Using a Waste Reutilization Strategy" Catalysts 15, no. 1: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010073

APA Style

Chang, F., Bao, W., Li, J., Zhao, Z., & Liu, D. (2025). Photocatalytic NO Removal by Ternary Composites Bi12GeO20/BiOCl/W18O49 Using a Waste Reutilization Strategy. Catalysts, 15(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop