Next Article in Journal
Some Critical Insights into the Synthesis and Applications of Hydrophobic Solid Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Ni/ZrTiAlOx Catalyst via Sol-Gel and Impregnation Methods for Low Temperature Dry Reforming of Methane
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/catal10111336
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Supported TiO2 in Carbonated Binding Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance

by
Heyang Si
1,2,
Yongle Fang
2 and
Lu Yang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, 122# Luoshi Road, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(11), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111336
Submission received: 17 October 2020 / Revised: 5 November 2020 / Accepted: 14 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although photocatalytic concrete can significantly contribute to the degradation of air pollutants and improving the sustainability levels, the complexity of ordinary cement system often caused the uncertain performance of mixed photocatalysts, which limited the real application of photocatalysts. Since the rapid carbonization hardening and relatively simple composition, γ-C2S carbonated binding material has gained considerable attention for its application in construction material. In this work, quartz sand-supported TiO2-C2S(γ) composites (TQSC) were prepared by mixing photocatalytic quartz sand with γ-C2S and mounting in γ-C2S matrix surface methods. The TiO2-coated quartz sand (TQS) was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), quantitative X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The photocatalytic performance and durability (washing resistance) of TQSC were also investigated by the degradation ability of NOx and rhodamine B (RhB). The results show that a uniform TiO2 layer on quartz sand was prepared, and the photocatalytic De-NOx (degradation of NOx) performance increased with increasing the mounted amounts of TiO2/quartz sand in γ-C2S carbonated matrix surface, but would decrease the photocatalytic durability. After water-washing, the De-NOx efficiencies of TQSC specimens decreased quickly at the beginning, which were adhering to the mounted amounts of TiO2/quartz sand, but would become stable after water-washing for 3600 s for all samples. The relatively high De-NOx stability and good self-cleaning effect of the water-washed TQSC-60% specimen can be considered a promising photocatalytic product for real applications.

1. Introduction

Acid rain and photochemical smog have been identified the most critical environmental problems in modern society, which usually caused by the gaseous pollutants such as NOx, SOx [1,2,3], etc. Of which, as one of the most common gaseous pollutants, NOx—mainly NO and NO2—primarily emitted from industrial and traffic, are the major source of photochemical smog. This produces a negative impact on our ecosystem and human health, as well as affecting buildings and industries [4,5,6]. Consequently, finding ways to abate the NOx atmospheric pollutants on a large scale is essential, and has attracted more and more attention in recent years.
As a promising technology to purify NOx harmful pollutants, photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) has been considered in the past [7,8]. Among available photocatalysts, titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the most commonly investigated due to its excellent chemical stability, high oxidizing ability and relatively low price [9,10,11,12,13]. The introduction of TiO2 into building materials is one of the directions for NOx degradation by using the adequate large exposed area of construction [14,15]. The incorporation methods of TiO2 as a photocatalyst in construction, mainly in cementitious material, can be divided into three categories: (i) blended TiO2 photocatalyst with cement, and then applied to the surface of mortar layer, (ii) sprayed TiO2 suspension on the surface of hardened mortar, and (iii) directly coated TiO2 photocatalytic powder on the surface of fresh mortar [16,17,18,19]. It has been demonstrated that a photocatalyst coating on the surface of cementitious materials is an effective way to promote photocatalytic efficiency [20,21,22]. However, the photocatalytic coatings susceptibly suffer from environmental abrasion, which limit their long-term application effects [23]. On the other hand, many useful studies also indicate that the efficiency of a photocatalyst can be adversely affected by the properties of Portland cementitious materials due to the low specific surface areas of cement, carbonization of surface, agglomeration of photocatalyst particles, diversified ion species and pH value in cement-based systems [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Through regulating the matrix microstructure, surface and TiO2 photocatalyst modifications, the photocatalytic ability of the photocatalytic cementitious materials can be efficiently increased [33,34,35,36], while the inherent cement environmental effects and relatively high cost of TiO2 photocatalysts are still the main limitations to the widespread application of photocatalytic cementitious materials.
Recently, the applications of gamma polymorph of dicalcium silicate (γ-C2S) in building materials have gained significant attention [37]. γ-C2S has inert hydration activity but high carbonation reactivity [38]; the carbonization products of γ-C2S contain calcium carbonates (calcite and aragonite) and amorphous silica gels in the presence of moisture and CO2 [39,40], indicates the excellent environment friendly of this material. Because of the carbonation, γ-C2S carbonated matrix surface has a relative stable chemical environment, and CaCO3 mainly provides the chance for the long-term application of TiO2 photocatalysts, which avoids the adverse effects of cement hydrates. Our previous work [41] also reveals that the hygroscopicity of CaCO3 and silica gel can change the moisture of photocatalytic materials, which are beneficial to the improvement De-NOx selectivity.
The complexity of ordinary Portland cement system often caused the uncertain performance of mixed photocatalysts, which limited the real application of photocatalysts, while the rapid carbonization hardening and relatively simple composition, as well as the hygroscopicity of carbonization products (CaCO3 and silica gel), such as γ-C2S binding material, can be considered as a promising substrate of photocatalysts. In this case, the using of supported TiO2 in the γ-C2S carbonated binding material can possibly promote the application efficiency of photocatalysts. The schematic principle of De-NOx by supporting TiO2 in the γ-C2S carbonated binding material is shown in Figure 1.
Therefore, in this work, we mainly focus on the application technologies and De-NOx and RhB photodegradation performance of supported TiO2 in γ-C2S carbonated binding materials (TQSC). Of which, γ-C2S was prepared as the substrate material, the quartz sand-supported TiO2, which is a promising photocatalytic aggregate for application in concrete reported by our previous work [42], was mounted to γ-C2S carbonated matrix surface with surface mixing methods. The efficiency of De-NOx (degradation of NOx) and its durability were evaluated and compared, respectively. Since rain-washing is an essential factor in its service life, the photocatalytic washing resistance of prepared specimens were also evaluated. We hope the results of this work can shed more light on the preparation of highly cost-efficient photocatalytic building materials.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Physical and Chemical Properties

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of prepared TiO2, TiO2/quartz sand and quartz sand. It can be seen that prepared TiO2 is an anatase crystal. Compared with the XRD pattern of quartz sand, it can be observed that there is no obvious TiO2 diffraction peak in TiO2/quartz sand, which indicates that TiO2 coating amounts in the particle surface of quartz sand are small or the diffraction peak intensity of quartz is too strong. This is consistent with our previous reports [41]. The coating amounts of TiO2 on quartz sand surface was therefore tested by XRF, as shown in Table 1; the coating mass fraction of is 0.327%.
The morphologies of quartz sand and TiO2/quartz sand can be observed in Figure 3, which show the different surface contrasts. In comparison with uncoated quartz sand (Figure 3(a1,a2)), complete TiO2 coverage can be directly observed on the surface of TiO2/quartz sand (Figure 3(b1,b2)). Moreover, the EDS element image (Figure 3(b3,b4)) also indicates that the TiO2 particles were successfully coated on quartz sand surface, which was similar with our previous reports [43].
Figure 4 shows the surface morphologies of TiO2/quartz sand in carbonated γ-C2S matrix with different embedded amounts, and a2, b2, c2, d2 and e2 are the high-resolution images of a1, b1, c1, d1 and e1, respectively. It can be seen that the surface morphologies of TQSC changed and the exposure surface areas of TiO2/quartz sand gradually increased as increasing embedded amounts. It also can be noticed that the coverage areas of carbonated γ-C2S on TiO2/quartz sand seem gradually increases as the embedded amounts of TiO2/quartz sand decreasing from 100% to 60%, indicating that the supported TiO2 exposure area is reduced but probably increasing the anchorage force. It is worth to mention that the increase of carbonated products, the amount of micropores on the specimen surface increases, which probably can improve the adsorption ability of gas and increase the nitrate selectivity (S%).

2.2. Photocatalytic Performance

Figure 5 shows the typical NO, NO2 and NOx concentration curves of prepared quartz sand-supported TiO2 under light and dark conditions. The photocatalytic procedure of NO can be divided into three stages: firstly, the concentrations of NO and NOx are stable in the dark; secondly, upon the light illumination, the concentrations of NO and NOx decrease and NO2 concentration increases until reach a stable level; thirdly, NO and NOx concentrations recover and the concentration of NO2 returns to initial state after turning off the light.
The photocatalytic performance of TiO2/quartz sand embedded carbonated C2S(γ) composites (TQSC) are shown in Figure 6. It can be observed that pure γ-C2S and unloaded quartz sand-C2S(γ) compositions presented almost no efficient on the degradation of NOx, while the photocatalysts supported samples showed the strong NOx degradation ability. It also can be noticed that the photonic efficiency of NO, NOx removal and NO2 intermediate production decreased obviously with reducing the mass fraction of TiO2/quartz sand surface mounted amounts, which were contributed to the reduction of TiO2 exposure surface areas as confirmed by the observation of Figure 4. It should be mentioned that TiO2/quartz sand mixed specimen showed lower NO, NO2 and NOx photonic efficiencies than these of TiO2/quartz sand surface mounted specimens. For NO degradation, the photocatalytic efficiencies of TQSC-100%, TQSC-90%, TQSC-80%, TQSC-70% and TQSC-60% are about 225, 160, 106, 64 and 36 times higher than that of TiO2/quartz sand mixed sample, respectively. For NOx degradation, the photocatalytic efficiencies are about 142, 103, 69, 46 and 26 times higher, respectively. However, the application amounts of photocatalytic TiO2 quartz sand in mixed specimen is about 11.7 times higher than that of TQSC-60% specimen. This suggests that TiO2/quartz sand surface mounted specimens have greater photocatalytic efficiency and better application cost efficient. As shown in Figure 6, for TiO2/quartz sand surface mounted specimens, the nitrate selectivity (S%) increased slightly with decreasing the mass fraction of TiO2/quartz sand application amounts, which were associated with the influences of increasing CaCO3 and silica gel. According to our previous work [41], the hygroscopicity of CaCO3 and silica gel can change the humidity of photocatalytic materials, which is beneficial to the improvement of S%. The increase in S% might also be related to the change of surface morphology of the specimens as the observation of Figure 4. With the increase of carbonated products, the amount of micropores on the specimen surface increases, which can improve the adsorption ability of gas and increase the nitrate selectivity (S%).

2.3. Photocatalytic Durability Evaluation

The photocatalytic durability is very important to the real application of photocatalytic concrete regarding to its application efficient and cost efficiency [44,45]. The water-washing test is one of durability evaluation methods to help understand the photocatalytic stability [46,47]. Figure 7 shows the De-NOx photonic efficiencies and nitrate selectivity of TiO2/quartz sand-supported C2S(γ) carbonated composites before and after the water-washing test. It can be observed that the photonic efficiencies of NO, NOx removal and NO2 intermediate production gradually decreased with the increase of washing time. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that NO, NOx and NO2 photonic efficiencies decreased fast in the first water-washing cycle, while became stable and stable in the following water-washing cycles. It is worth to mention that the reduction range of NO, NOx and NO2 photonic efficiencies decrease after the washing time reaches 60 s, and almost stable at 3600 s, which may be associated with the decline of photocatalytic performance of TiO2/quartz sand or the drop out of photocatalysts from matrix after water-washing [41]. This can likely be attributed to the accumulation of TiO2/quartz sand on the γ-C2S carbonated matrix surface, which results in the weak binding performance of some photocatalytic quartz sand and carbonated products. After the initial water-washing, the faster decrease in photonic efficiency for the high-mass fraction of photocatalytic quartz sand (TQSC-100% and TQSC-90%) can provide evidence to the above conclusions.
Figure 7 shows the nitrate selectivity (S%) of each specimen before and after water-washing test. It can be observed that the S% of each sample almost increased with the increase of water-washing time, which probably due to the exposure areas increase of CaCO3 and silica gel, and subsequent increased the adsorbed water of photocatalytic materials surface, which have a positive effect on S% proven by our previous work [41]. It also can be seen that the NO, NOx and NO2 photonic efficiencies of TiO2/quartz sand-supported γ-C2S carbonated composite (TQSC-60%) is relatively stable after a long period of washing, meaning that the photocatalytic durability is better than others.
After water-washing for 3600 s, the self-cleaning performance of TiO2/quartz sand-supported γ-C2S carbonated composite (TQSC-60%) was also was studied by the color change of the sample surface under the identical light source of the photocatalytic De-NOx experiment. Figure 8 shows the images taken before and after lamp irradiation 4 h. It can be observed that the RhB (rhodamine B, 20 mg·L−1, 1 mL) coated pure γ-C2S surface has almost no color change after light irradiation, but the color in washed-TQSC-60% surface almost faded, which indicates that the TiO2/quartz sand-supported C2S(γ) carbonated composites still maintained its photocatalytic performance under light irradiation after a long period of water-washing, and the washed-TQSC-60% also present the excellent self-cleaning ability to photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The γ-C2S used in this study was produced by Ca(OH)2 and SiO2, which was calcined at 1400 °C for 3 h, and then cooled in the natural atmosphere [48]. The quartz sand with 0.075–0.107 mm diameter was used to support TiO2 photocatalysts in this study. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 0.1 M), C2H5OH (absolute ethanol, 99.9%), titanium tetra-isopropoxide (TTIP, 99.9%) and CH3COOH (acetic acid, 99.6%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. Deionized water was used throughout the process of sample preparation.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. TiO2 Hydrosol Preparation

TiO2 hydrosol was synthesized based on a low temperature precipitation–peptization method [41,49]. The preparation method are as follows. Ten mL of titanium tetra-isopropoxide and 30 mL of absolute ethanol were mixed with stirring for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the mixed solution was dropwise added into the other mixture (reaction solution pH = 2.29), which contained 8 mL of CH3COOH and 160 mL of deionized water. After that, the obtained suspension was stirred for 48 h at 50 °C, and then aged for 72 h at room temperature. The specific surface area of obtained TiO2 catalysts was 177.85 m2·g−1.

3.2.2. TiO2 Supported Quartz Sands Preparation

The method of preparing TiO2-coated quartz sand (TQS) is as follows. Before coating TiO2 on quartz sand with 0.075–0.107 mm diameter, the sand was treated with 0.1 M NaOH for 24 h to maximize the hydroxide groups of the surface. Subsequently, the alkaline treated quartz sand was washed with deionized water three times and dried at 105 °C for 24 h. After that, the obtained quartz sand was distributed uniformly immersed in the prepared TiO2 hydrosol suspension for 5 min. The resulting mixture was filtrated and then dried at 105 °C for 24 h to produce TQS. The specific surface area of TiO2/quartz sand was 42.83 m2·g−1.

3.2.3. Photocatalytic γ-C2S Carbonated Matrix Preparation

The preparation route of photocatalytic γ-C2S carbonated matrix is shown in Figure 9, it can be divided to compaction and carbonization steps. For TiO2/quartz sand surface-mounted samples, the detail preparation steps are as follows: 1.5 g of prepared TiO2/quartz sand (TQS) and a certain amount of γ-C2S slurry (water/γ-C2S mass ratio = 0.15 [48]) were mixed uniformly, and then the mixture was uniformly distributed on the bottom of steel mould (100 mm length × 100 mm width × 50 mm height), after that, 35 g of γ-C2S and 5.25 g of water were mixed for 2 min followed by spreading on the top layer. Subsequently, the steel mould was compacted until the displayed pressure reached 40 MPa for 1 min. In order to expediently de-mould, the specimen was pre-carbonated in the bucket for 1 h before unmolding. The pre-carbonated specimen was then put into the carbonation tank curing for 3 h at 0.3 MPa pressure. Finally, TQS-surface-mounted γ-C2S carbonated matrix was prepared, which marked as TQSC specimen. For comparison, TQS surface mounted mass fractions were set as 100%, 90%, 80%, 70% and 60% to total mass of surface TQS/γ-C2S, respectively. The prepared specimens were denoted as TQSC-m, where m was the mass fraction of TQS on the surface (m = 100%, 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%).
In addition, pure quartz sand surface-mounted and pure γ-C2S samples via foregoing method also were prepared for comparison, which were denoted as QSC-100% and pure γ-C2S, respectively. TQS dispersed in γ-C2S matrix sample was also prepared, the mixing amounts of TQS was 10.5 g. The obtained TiO2/quartz sand blended γ-C2S matrix specimen was denoted as mixed.

3.3. Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was conducted by a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (BRUKER AXS GMBH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation, the test 2θ value ranging was 20–70° with 6°·min−1 scanning speed. The loading quantity of TiO2 on quartz sand was obtained by quantitative X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Zetium). Surface morphology and elemental composition of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI QUANTA FEG 450, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis at ca.10 mm working distance and accelerating voltage of 15 and 20 kV.

3.4. Photocatalytic Performance

3.4.1. Photocatalytic Removal of NOx

The photocatalytic efficiencies of the prepared photocatalytic specimens were evaluated by the degradation ability of NOx in the ISO reactor, schematically illustrated in Figure 10. The sample was placed inside the ISO reactor and irradiated by a 300 W Xe-lamp solar simulator (CEL-HXF300, CeauLight Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), adjusting the distance between the reactor and lamp to acquire that the photon flux on the surface of sample was measured to be 3.05 × 10−6 mol·s−1·m−2. 1 ppm of NO in synthesized air, conditioned at a 50% relative humidity and 25 °C of the test environment temperature, was passed through the reactor with a flow velocity of 5 × 10−5 m3·s−1. The concentrations of NO, NO2 and NOx were continuously measured by a NO-NO2-NOx analyzer (HN-CK5001, Taiyuan Hainachenke Instrument Co., Ltd., Taiyuan China). Each specimen was measured in the dark until the equilibrium concentration of NO, NO2 and NOx was reached. And then, under the illumination until NO, NO2 and NOx concentrations reached steady state. After that, each sample was measured in the dark again until steady state concentrations were observed. For comparison, the photocatalytic performance of carbonated pure γ-C2S plate, TiO2 supported/unsupported quartz sand composite and photocatalytic quartz sand dispersed in γ-C2S substrate specimens were measured under the identical conditions and testing procedure. The photonic efficiency (ξ) of NOx, NO and NO2 was calculated according to Equation (1). The catalyst selectivity for nitrate (S%) was calculated according to Equation (2) [50].
ξ = ( C d − C i ) VP Φ ART × 100 %
S % = ξ NOx ξ NO × 100
where Cd is the concentration of NOx, NO or NO2 in the dark; Ci is the concentration of NOx, NO or NO2 under the light irrigation; V (m3·s−1) is the volumetric flow rate; P (Pa) is the pressure; Φ (mol·s−1·m2) is the photon flux impinging the surface; A (m2) is the irradiated specimen area; R (J·mol−1·K−1) is the gas constant; T (K) is the temperature.

3.4.2. Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB

The photocatalytic degradation of RhB was evaluated according to the previously reported literature [51,52,53,54]. Typically, the prepared plastic with a diameter of 20 mm was glued to the surface of as-prepared sample. 1 mL rhodamine B solution at a concentration of 20 mg·L−1 was uniformly spread to the specimen surface within the plastic ring. And then, the specimens were dried at 40 ℃ for 12 h to solvent drying and dye adsorption. After that, a dried sample was placed under a 300 W xenon lamp (CEL-HXF300, CeauLight Co., Ltd. China), and the distance between the sample and the lamp was adjusted to obtain the illumination intensity of 1 mW·cm−2 on the sample surface. The RhB photodegradation was performed by measuring the color change on the sample surface when the irradiation time was 4 h.

3.5. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Durability

To study photocatalytic durability of prepared samples, a rain wash simulator was employed. The schematic diagram and test device of washing resistance were shown in Figure 11. The specific testing procedure is as follows: the surface of resulting specimens was washed with 450 mL·min−1 of deionized water at room temperature for 10 s and dried at 105 °C for 12 h. And then, the dried samples were carried out the photocatalytic measurement. The total process was repeated five times, and the other washing times were 30 s, 60 s, 600 s, 1800 s, 3600 s, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Based on the environmental friendliness and rapid carbonization/hardening of γ-C2S carbonated binding materials, the TiO2/quartz sand-supported C2S(γ) carbonated composites (TQSC) and photocatalytic quartz sand was prepared. In doing so, their physicochemical properties, photocatalytic performance and durability to NOx and RhB were investigated in detail. The characterization results of XRD, SEM and XRF confirmed a uniform TiO2 layer in quartz sand surface was formed, and the TiO2/quartz sand mass fraction (MF) is 0.327%. The experimental results showed that with a decrease in the mounted amounts of TiO2/quartz sand in γ-C2S carbonated matrix surface, more photocatalytic quartz sand would be covered by γ-C2S carbonated products, resulting in the reduction of De-NOx performance. All TQSC specimens showed higher De-NOx efficiency than that of the mixed specimen, confirming greater photocatalytic efficiency and low-price advantages of TiO2/quartz sand-C2S(γ) carbonated composites. After water-washing, the De-NOx efficiencies of TQSC specimens decreased fast in the initial time but would become stable after 3600 s of water-washing. In compared with the pure sample, the relatively high performance of De-NOx and the good self-cleaning effect of RhB on the water-washed TQSC-60% specimen can be considered to be a promising photocatalytic product for real applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization H.S., L.Y.; methodology H.S., L.Y.; software, H.S.; investigation H.S., Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation H.S., L.Y.; supervision L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51802238 and 51925205) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT2018IVA011, WUT2018III022, 2019IVB060, 2020-zy-015, 2020-zy-016).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asim, N.; Alghoul, M.; Mohammad, M.; Amin, M.H.; Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Amin, N.; Sopian, K. Emerging sustainable solutions for depollution: Geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 199, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pérez-Nicolás, M.; Balbuena, J.; Cruz-Yusta, M.; Sánchez, L.; Navarro-Blasco, I.; Fernández, J.M.; Alvarez, J.I. Photocatalytic NOx abatement by calcium aluminate cements modified with TiO2: Improved NO2 conversion. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 70, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Jin, Q.; Saad, E.M.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Y.; Kurtis, K.E. Quantification of NOx uptake in plain and TiO2-doped cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, M.Z.; Chen, J.; Xia, M.; Wang, T.; Poon, C.S. Pathways of conversion of nitrogen oxides by nano TiO2 incorporated in cement-based materials. Build. Environ. 2018, 144, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Melo, J.V.S.D.; Trichês, G. Evaluation of the influence of environmental conditions on the efficiency of photocatalytic coatings in the degradation of nitrogen oxides (NOx). Build. Environ. 2012, 49, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qian, C.X.; Zhao, L.F.; Fu, D.F.; Li, L.; Wang, R.X. Study on the effect of temperature, humidity and light intensity on photocatalytic oxidation of NO2 by Nano-TiO2 immobilized on cement-based materials. J. Environ. Sci. China 2005, 25, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mills, A.; Elouali, S. The nitric oxide ISO photocatalytic reactor system: Measurement of NOx removal activity and capacity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 305, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gauvin, F.; Caprai, V.; Yu, Q.L.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Effect of the morphology and pore structure of porous building materials on photocatalytic oxidation of air pollutants. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 227, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strini, A.; Cassese, S.; Schiavi, L. Measurement of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene gas phase photodegradation by titanium dioxide dispersed in cementitious materials using a mixed flow reactor. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 61, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mills, A.; Hill, C.; Robertson, P.K.J. Overview of the current ISO tests for photocatalytic materials. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2012, 237, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hakki, A.; Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. The Effect of Interfacial Chemical Bonding in TiO2-SiO2 Composites on Their Photocatalytic NOx Abatement Performance. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 125, e56070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fujishima, M.; Takatori, H.; Tada, H. Interfacial chemical bonding effect on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-SiO2 nanocoupling systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 361, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maggos, T.; Bartzis, J.G.; Liakou, M.; Gobin, C. Photocatalytic degradation of NOx gases using TiO2-containing paint: A real scale study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, M.Z.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NO removal of concrete surface layers intermixed with TiO2. Build. Environ. 2013, 70, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jimenez-Relinque, E.; Rodriguez-Garcia, J.R.; Castillo, A.; Castellote, M. Characteristics and efficiency of photocatalytic cementitious materials: Type of binder, roughness and microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 71, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic cementitious materials: Influence of the microstructure of cement paste on photocatalytic pollution degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8948–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lucas, S.; Ferreira, V.; De Aguiar, J.B. Incorporation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mortars—Influence of microstructure in the hardened state properties and photocatalytic activity. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 43, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cassar, L. Photocatalysis of Cementitious Materials: Clean Buildings and Clean Air. Mrs Bull. 2004, 29, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ballari, M.M.; Yu, Q.L.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Experimental study of the NO and NO2 degradation by photocatalytically active concrete. Catal. Today 2011, 161, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martinez, T.; Bertron, A.; Ringot, E.; Escadeillas, G. Degradation of NO using photocatalytic coatings applied to different substrates. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Faraldos, M.; Kropp, R.; Anderson, M.A.; Sobolev, K. Photocatalytic hydrophobic concrete coatings to combat air pollution. Catal. Today 2015, 259, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, M.Z.; Ling, T.C.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NOx degradation of concrete surface layers intermixed and spray-coated with nano-TiO2: Influence of experimental factors. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 83, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boonen, E.; Beeldens, A. Photocatalytic roads: From lab tests to real scale applications. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2013, 5, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Macphee, D.E.; Folli, A. Photocatalytic concretes—The interface between photocatalysis and cement chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, M.Z.; Maury-Ramirez, A.; Poon, C.S. Self-cleaning ability of titanium dioxide clear paint coated architectural mortar and its potential in field application. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3583–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bocci, E.; Riderelli, L.; Fava, G.; Bocci, M. Durability of NO oxidation effectiveness of pavement surfaces treated with photocatalytic Titanium Dioxide. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2016, 41, 4827–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Galli, F.; Cerrato, G.; Morandi, S.; Capucci, V. Pigmentary TiO2: A challenge for its use as photocatalyst in NOx air purification. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 261, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Todorova, N.; Giannakopoulou, T.; Karapati, S.; Petridis, D.; Vaimakis, T.; Trapalis, C. Composite TiO2/clays materials for photocatalytic NOx oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 319, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kamaruddin, S.; Stephan, D. Quartz–titania composites for the photocatalytical modification of construction materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 36, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Folli, A.; Pochard, I.; Nonat, A.; Jakobsen, U.H.; Shepherd, A.M.; Macphee, D.E. Engineering Photocatalytic Cements: Understanding TiO2 Surface Chemistry to Control and Modulate Photocatalytic Performances. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3360–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Folli, A.; Pade, C.; Hansen, T.B.; Marco, T.D.; Macphee, D.E. TiO2 photocatalysis in cementitious systems: Insights into self-cleaning and depollution chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Karatasios, I.; Katsiotis, M.S.; Likodimos, V.; Kontos, A.I.; Papavassiliou, G.; Falaras, P.; Kilikoglou, V. Photo-induced carbonation of lime-TiO2 mortars. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 95, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tsang, C.H.A.; Li, K.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhan, Y.; Xie, R.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Huang, H. Titanium oxide based photocatalytic materials development and their role of in the air pollutants degradation: Overview and forecast. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 200–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Shu, C.; Liu, P.; Zhang, W.; Hu, S.; Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Shu, C.; Liu, P. TiO2/porous cementitious composites: Influences of porosities and TiO2 loading levels on photocatalytic degradation of gaseous benzene. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 150, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sugrañez, R.; Álvarez, J.; Cruz-Yusta, M.; Mármol, I.; Morales, J.; Vila, J.; Sánchez, L. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of NOx gases by regulating the microstructure of mortar cement modified with titanium dioxide. Build. Environ. 2013, 69, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karapati, S.; Giannakopoulou, T.; Todorova, N.; Boukos, N.; Dimotikali, D.; Trapalis, C. Eco-efficient TiO2 modification for air pollutants oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176–177, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, F.; Huang, X. Effect of barium doping on carbonation behavior of γ-C2S. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 27, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guan, X.M.; Liu, S.H.; Feng, C.H.; Qiu, M. The hardening behavior of γ-C2S binder using accelerated carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, J.; Fang, Y.; Shang, X. The role of β-C2S and γ-C2S in carbon capture and strength development. Mater. Struct. 2016, 49, 4417–4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, C.J.; Bo, Q.; John, L.P. Recent progress in low-carbon binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalyst efficiencies in concrete technology: The effect of photocatalyst placement. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 222, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zheng, L.; Jones, M.R.; Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Macphee, D.E. Exposed-aggregate areas and photocatalytic efficiency of photocatalytic aggregate mortar. Mag. Concr. Res. 2020, 72, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Zheng, L.; Jones, M.R.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalytic concrete for NOx abatement: Supported TiO2 efficiencies and impacts. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 116, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Boonen, E.; Beeldens, A.; Dirkx, I.; Bams, V. Durability of Cementitious Photocatalytic Building Materials. Catal Today 2017, 287, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Enea, D.; Bellardita, M.; Scalisi, P.; Alaimo, G.; Palmisano, L. Effects of weathering on the performance of self-cleaning photocatalytic paints. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 96, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, Y.; Ji, T.; Su, W.; Kang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced washing resistance of photocatalytic exposed aggregate cementitious materials based on g-C3N4 nanosheets-recycled asphalt pavement aggregate composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Veltri, S.; Palermo, A.M.; De Filpo, G.; Xu, F. Subsurface treatment of TiO2 nanoparticles for limestone: Prolonged surface photocatalytic biocidal activities. Build. Environ. 2019, 149, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, F. Comparative Study on the Carbonation-Activated Calcium Silicates as Sustainable Binders: Reactivity, Mechanical Performance, and Microstructure. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 7058–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Burunkaya, E.; Akarsu, M.; Erdem Çamurlu, H.; Kesmez, Ö.; Yeşil, Z.; Asiltürk, M.; Arpaç, E. Production of stable hydrosols of crystalline TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized at relatively low temperatures in diverse media. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 265, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Different Roles of Water in Photocatalytic DeNOx Mechanisms on TiO2: Basis for Engineering Nitrate Selectivity? ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 17034–17041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yang, Y.; Ji, T.; Su, W.; Yang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z. Photocatalytic NOx abatement and self-cleaning performance of cementitious composites with g-C3N4 nanosheets under visible light. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 225, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.G.; Qudoos, A.; Ryou, J.S. Effect of leaching on the hardened, microstructural and self-cleaning characteristics of titanium dioxide containing cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, J.; Kou, S.C.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic cement-based materials: Comparison of nitrogen oxides and toluene removal potentials and evaluation of self-cleaning performance. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 1827–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shen, W.G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.S.; Cao, L.; Ye, J.Y. Preparation of titanium dioxide nano particle modified photocatalytic self-cleaning concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 762–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 10 01336 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic of De-NOx via photocatalytic oxidation.
Figure 1. The schematic of De-NOx via photocatalytic oxidation.
Catalysts 10 01336 g001
Catalysts 10 01336 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of quartz sand, TiO2/quartz sand and pure TiO2.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of quartz sand, TiO2/quartz sand and pure TiO2.
Catalysts 10 01336 g002
Catalysts 10 01336 g003 550
Figure 3. Surface morphologies of pure quartz sand (a) and TiO2/quartz sand (b).
Figure 3. Surface morphologies of pure quartz sand (a) and TiO2/quartz sand (b).
Catalysts 10 01336 g003
Catalysts 10 01336 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM patterns of specimens: (a) TQSC-100%; (b) TQSC-90%; (c) TQSC-80%; (d) TQSC-70% and (e) TQSC-60%.
Figure 4. SEM patterns of specimens: (a) TQSC-100%; (b) TQSC-90%; (c) TQSC-80%; (d) TQSC-70% and (e) TQSC-60%.
Catalysts 10 01336 g004
Catalysts 10 01336 g005 550
Figure 5. Concentration outlines of NO, NO2 and NOx for TiO2/quartz sand during the photocatalytic oxidation of NO.
Figure 5. Concentration outlines of NO, NO2 and NOx for TiO2/quartz sand during the photocatalytic oxidation of NO.
Catalysts 10 01336 g005
Catalysts 10 01336 g006 550
Figure 6. NO, NO2 and NOx photonic efficiencies and nitrate selectivity (S%) of pure γ-C2S, QSC-100%, mixed and TQSC specimens.
Figure 6. NO, NO2 and NOx photonic efficiencies and nitrate selectivity (S%) of pure γ-C2S, QSC-100%, mixed and TQSC specimens.
Catalysts 10 01336 g006
Catalysts 10 01336 g007 550
Figure 7. De-NOx photonic efficiencies and nitrate selectivity (S%) of quartz sand-supported TiO2-C2S(γ) compositions before and after the washing test.
Figure 7. De-NOx photonic efficiencies and nitrate selectivity (S%) of quartz sand-supported TiO2-C2S(γ) compositions before and after the washing test.
Catalysts 10 01336 g007
Catalysts 10 01336 g008 550
Figure 8. Color variation of RhB coated on pure γ-C2S and washed-TQSC-60%.
Figure 8. Color variation of RhB coated on pure γ-C2S and washed-TQSC-60%.
Catalysts 10 01336 g008
Catalysts 10 01336 g009 550
Figure 9. Preparation schematic diagram of photocatalytic γ-C2S carbonated matrix.
Figure 9. Preparation schematic diagram of photocatalytic γ-C2S carbonated matrix.
Catalysts 10 01336 g009
Catalysts 10 01336 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of photocatalytic reaction for NOx degradation.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of photocatalytic reaction for NOx degradation.
Catalysts 10 01336 g010
Catalysts 10 01336 g011 550
Figure 11. Washing test: (a) Schematic diagram; (b) top view of the washing test.
Figure 11. Washing test: (a) Schematic diagram; (b) top view of the washing test.
Catalysts 10 01336 g011
Table
Table 1. Chemical compositions of quartz sand and TiO2/quartz sand.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of quartz sand and TiO2/quartz sand.
Chemical Composition
(Mass Fraction, %)		Quartz SandTiO2/Quartz Sand
Na2O0.0370.035
Al2O30.1150.144
SiO299.69598.680
P2O50.0360.032
SO30.0150.024
TiO2-0.327
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Si, H.; Fang, Y.; Yang, L. Application of Supported TiO2 in Carbonated Binding Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111336

AMA Style

Si H, Fang Y, Yang L. Application of Supported TiO2 in Carbonated Binding Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance. Catalysts. 2020; 10(11):1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Si, Heyang, Yongle Fang, and Lu Yang. 2020. "Application of Supported TiO2 in Carbonated Binding Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance" Catalysts 10, no. 11: 1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop