Next Article in Journal
Alzheimer’s Disease and Different Types of Cancer Likelihood: Unveiling Disparities and Potential Protective Effects in a Korean Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of the Vulva: A Review of the MITO Rare Cancer Group
Previous Article in Journal
Significance of 8-OHdG Expression as a Predictor of Survival in Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Lower Female Genital Tract in Pregnancy: A Review of the MITO Rare Tumors Group
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Primary Retroperitoneal Carcinomas: New Insights into Pathogenesis and Clinical Management in Comparison with Ovarian Carcinomas and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Japan
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4614; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184614
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 16 September 2023 / Published: 18 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rare Gynecological Cancers)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Primary retroperitoneal carcinomas are very rare tumors. Their pathogenesis remains unknown but may be associated with that of ovarian carcinomas, considering the similarity in morphology and gender preference. Mucinous carcinoma, which develops in both women and men, may originate in both primordial germ cells and Walthard cell nests that may be derived from the fallopian tube. Serous carcinomas may be associated with endosalpingiosis and a remnant Müllerian tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas appear to be associated with extraovarian endometriosis. Additionally, both carcinomas in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes may be metastatic diseases from endometrial and/or renal cell cancers that regress spontaneously (carcinoma of unknown primary). Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment, but the necessity of chemotherapy may depend on histological subtype. Further studies are necessary, in particular studies on endosalpingiosis, which is a poorly understood condition, although associated with the development of both serous and mucinous carcinomas.

Abstract

Primary retroperitoneal carcinomas are very rare tumors. Their pathogenesis remains unknown but may be associated with that of ovarian carcinomas, considering the similarity in morphology and gender preference. Although metaplasia of coelomic epithelium is the most widely accepted theory, the pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas may differ by histologic subtype, like ovarian carcinomas. Mucinous carcinoma, which develops in both women and men, may originate in both primordial germ cells and Walthard cell nests that may be derived from the fallopian tube. Serous carcinomas may be associated with endosalpingiosis, the presence of fallopian tube-like epithelium outside the fallopian tube, and a remnant Müllerian tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas appear to be associated with extraovarian endometriosis. Additionally, both carcinomas in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes may be metastatic diseases from endometrial and/or renal cell cancer that regress spontaneously (carcinoma of unknown primary). Retroperitoneal carcinomas are difficult to diagnose, as they have no characteristic symptoms and signs. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment, but the necessity of chemotherapy may depend on histological subtype. Further studies are necessary, in particular studies on endosalpingiosis, as endosalpingiosis is a poorly understood condition, although it is associated with the development of both serous and mucinous carcinomas.

1. Introduction

In the retroperitoneal space, many types of tumors develop, both primary and metastatic [1]. Primary retroperitoneal malignant neoplasms account for only 0.1–0.2% of all malignancies [2], and most of these neoplasms are mesenchymal, neurogenic or lymphatic, i.e., those originating from tissues in the retroperitoneal space [3]. In addition, primary epithelial neoplasms can also develop in this space. Of these, primary retroperitoneal epithelial carcinomas are very rare.
The pathogenesis of primary retroperitoneal carcinomas remains unknown. Their pathogenesis, however, may be associated with that of ovarian carcinomas, as histological subtypes of retroperitoneal carcinomas are the same as those of ovarian carcinomas. In addition, primary retroperitoneal carcinomas almost exclusively develop in women, excluding mucinous tumors that develop in both women and men. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinomas and their origins [4,5]. Ovarian carcinomas are a group of neoplasms that are essentially distinct diseases [6]. Additionally, most ovarian carcinomas may be imported diseases, i.e., they stem from Müllerian-derived extraovarian cells that involve the ovary secondarily [7]. Similarly, retroperitoneal carcinomas may be imported diseases arising from cells of extra-retroperitoneal origin. Moreover, some types of carcinomas of unknown primary may be classified as primary retroperitoneal carcinoma, considering that carcinomas of unknown primary are often observed only in the retroperitoneal space. This narrative review explores the pathogenesis of primary retroperitoneal carcinomas based on the knowledge of ovarian carcinogenesis. In addition, the clinical management of retroperitoneal carcinomas is discussed.

2. Classification of Retroperitoneal Carcinomas

Retroperitoneal carcinomas can be classified according to histological characteristics and the site of the disease.

2.1. Histological Subtype

Histological subtypes of retroperitoneal epithelial carcinomas include mucinous [8,9,10,11,12,13], serous [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], endometrioid [30,31,32,33,34], clear cell [35,36,37,38], and carcinosarcoma [39,40,41]. Morphologically, mucinous, serous, and endometrioid tumors resemble the phenotype of the colon, fallopian tube, and endometrium, respectively [42]. Clear cell carcinoma develops in the female genital tract (the ovary, endometrium, cervix, and vagina) as well as in the kidney, and may have similar morphological features regardless of the site of origin [43].
Mucinous carcinoma is the most common subtype of primary retroperitoneal carcinomas. More than 70 cases have been reported in the literature (Table 1) [8,9]. Of retroperitoneal mucinous tumors, carcinomas and borderline tumors are more common than benign cystadenoma [10]. Although retroperitoneal mucinous tumors develop in both women and men, a previous study reported that 94% of mucinous carcinomas develop in women (Table 1) [8]. Median age at diagnosis in women was significantly younger than that in men (42.0 years vs. 62.2 years) [8]. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous carcinomas diagnosed during pregnancy have been reported [11,12,13]. Retroperitoneal serous carcinoma is a very rare occurrence, with 16 cases having been reported (Table 2). All but one case developed in women. The ages range from 11 to 75 years (median 58 years), with only one patient developing primary retroperitoneal serous carcinoma prepubertally. Histologically, both low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas were observed. Of note, a few cases reported as primary retroperitoneal serous carcinoma might not be primary but lymph node metastasis from adnexal or peritoneal carcinoma [26], although there is a possibility that they may be double synchronous primaries. Retroperitoneal endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas are even rarer, as only five and four cases have been reported, respectively (Table 3) [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Whereas endometrioid carcinomas developed only in women, two of the four clear cell carcinomas developed in men [36,38]. These retroperitoneal carcinomas may be diagnosed as carcinomas of unknown primary [38]. Mixed epithelial carcinomas (Table 3) [37,44] and carcinosarcoma [39,40,41] also develop in the retroperitoneal space.

2.2. Site of Disease

Retroperitoneal carcinomas develop in the lymph nodes and/or extranodal sites. In cases of huge tumors, this classification may not be possible. When carcinomas are found in the lymph nodes alone, they may be diagnosed as carcinoma of unknown primary [33].

3. Previously Postulated Pathogenesis of Retroperitoneal Carcinomas

Although the pathogenesis of primary retroperitoneal carcinomas has not been elucidated, several hypotheses have been postulated [45,46,47,48,49]. The most widely accepted theory is metaplasia of coelomic epithelium [14,15,16,46,47,48]. Other possible origins include extra-ovarian endometriosis, teratoma or primordial germ cell, ectopic ovarian tissue, and intestinal duplication (enterogenic cyst) [17,21].
The coelomic epithelium gives rise to the peritoneum [50], and invagination of the peritoneum results in inclusion cysts in a retroperitoneal space [45]. The Müllerian duct, which eventually forms the fallopian tube, endometrium, endocervix, and the upper third of the vagina, is known to form by invagination of the coelomic epithelium [51]. The coelomic epithelium covering cysts may subsequently undergo metaplasia [52]. Malignant transformation of endometriosis, which is a gynecological disease defined by the histological presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity [53], is a rare but well-known complication. Migratory arrest of primordial germ cells is thought to be the basis of a teratoma in the retroperitoneal space. Monodermal variants of teratomas may be an origin of retroperitoneal carcinomas [47,48]. Ectopic ovarian tissue and intestinal duplication may be the origins of retroperitoneal carcinomas [47,48]. However, the intestinal duplication hypothesis seems unlikely, as enterogenic cysts are gut-like and they consist of one or two layers of smooth muscle and gut mucosa [54].

4. Pathogenesis of Ovarian Carcinomas

As stated above, ovarian carcinomas are a group of distinct diseases, exhibiting a wide range of morphological features, clinical manifestations, and tumor behaviors [55]. In addition, they are different in terms of epidemiological and genetic risk factors, precursor lesions, and molecular events during oncogenesis [6].
Traditionally, all of the four major subtypes of ovarian carcinomas, i.e., serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous tumors, were thought to derive from the common origin, i.e., ovarian surface epithelium [56,57]. The ovarian surface epithelium, which is derived from the coelomic epithelium, is the pelvic peritoneum that overlies the ovary and lines ovarian epithelial inclusion cysts [58,59]. In contrast to this traditional view, most ovarian carcinomas are now believed to derive from endometrial tissue, fallopian tube tissue, and germ cells [60]. Thus, most ovarian carcinomas are primarily imported from either endometrial or fallopian tube epithelium, unlike other human cancers in which all primary tumors arise de novo [61].

4.1. Mucinous Carcinoma

Among the four major subtypes of ovarian carcinomas, mucinous carcinoma is distinct from other histologic subtypes [62]. Different from non-mucinous carcinomas that morphologically resemble epithelia originating in the Müllerian duct, mucinous carcinoma resembles the colon epithelium. Risk/protective factors for ovarian carcinomas include parity, breast-feeding, oral contraceptive use, and family history of ovarian/breast cancer [63]. However, these factors were not associated with the development of mucinous carcinomas [64,65,66].
Mucinous ovarian carcinoma develops via a sequence from benign tumor through borderline tumor to invasive cancer [67,68]. In contrast to non-mucinous ovarian carcinomas that are associated with ovulation and menstruation [69,70,71], a mucinous ovarian carcinoma develops in premenarchal girls [72], suggesting that some mucinous tumors have common features with germ cell tumors. Smoking [64,65,66] and heavy alcohol consumption [73] that is associated with colorectal cancers [74] are risk factors for mucinous carcinomas.
Recently, mucinous carcinomas are suggested to originate from either teratomas or Brenner tumors [75]. Mucinous cystic tumors sometimes arise in the context of mature cystic teratomas and other primordial germ cell tumors [76,77,78]. Patients with teratoma-associated mucinous tumors were significantly younger than patients with Brenner tumor-associated mucinous tumors (43 vs. 61 years) [75]. Interestingly, teratomas and Brenner tumors give rise to different subtypes of mucinous ovarian tumors [75]. The presence of mucinous tumors within Brenner tumors has been reported to be up to 33% [75], and molecular genetic analysis indicated that mucinous and Brenner tumors have a shared origin [79]. Endosalpingiosis, i.e., the presence of fallopian tube-like epithelium outside the fallopian tube, is also associated with mucinous tumors [80,81]. A recent study using genetic analyses indicated that mucinous ovarian tumors of germ cell origin may be rare [82].

4.2. Serous Carcinoma

Most serous carcinomas develop from the fallopian tube epithelium [4,5]. Serous carcinomas, the most common histological subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, are divided into high-grade and low-grade carcinomas, as they are different in terms of pathogenesis, disease spread pattern, and prognosis [5]. A significant proportion of high-grade serous carcinoma develops in the secretory epithelial cells of the tubal fimbria [83,84]. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been performed in women with germline BRCA mutation who are at risk for developing high-grade serous carcinoma, since high-grade serous carcinoma cannot be detected early by screening using transvaginal ultrasound [85,86]. Pathological evaluation of the removed ovaries and fallopian tubes revealed that a precursor lesion of high-grade serous carcinoma, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, is located in the fallopian tube epithelium [87]. This discovery led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of the origin of ovarian carcinomas. However, 12–40% of high-grade serous carcinomas are reported to derive from ovarian surface epithelium [4,88,89]. Low-grade serous carcinoma, which develops from benign ovarian cyst (cystadenoma) through borderline tumor to invasive carcinoma, is also of tubal origin [90]. Ovarian epithelial inclusions, from which serous cystadenoma develops, are likely to derive from the fallopian tube through an intraovarian endosalpingiosis rather than through Müllerian metaplasia from ovarian surface epithelium [90]. However, recent studies reported that intraovarian endosalpingiosis may not arise as a consequence of detachment and implantation of tubal epithelium [91,92].

4.3. Endometrioid Carcinoma

Endometrioid carcinoma, as well as clear cell carcinoma, is derived from endometriosis. Endometriosis, in particular endometriotic cyst, is a precursor to endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas [93,94,95], as the molecular genetic alterations present in endometriosis-associated carcinomas can be found in adjacent endometriosis lesions [95]. Ovarian endometriosis occurs primarily as a result of retrograde menstruation and implantation of endometrial tissue fragments in ovarian inclusion cyst [70,96]. A recent study suggested that endometrioid carcinomas derive from cells of the endometrial secretory cell lineage, whereas clear cell carcinomas derive from cells of the endometrial ciliated cell lineage [97]. Of note, endocervical-like (Müllerian) mucinous tumors are now classified as a subtype of endometrioid tumors [98].

4.4. Clear Cell Carcinoma

Although clear cell carcinoma is another endometriosis-associated carcinoma in women, it develops not only in ovarian endometriotic cysts but also the kidney [99,100,101]. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary shares many histologic features with renal cell carcinoma, especially translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, hence the determination of the origin may not be possible based on the morphology alone [101]. Using immunohistochemical markers, ovarian clear cell carcinoma can be distinguished from renal clear cell and translocation-associated carcinoma [101]. Interestingly, however, clear cell carcinomas showed remarkably similar gene expression patterns regardless of their origin [102].

4.5. Carcinosarcoma

Carcinosarcomas are biphasic neoplasms that are composed of an admixture of malignant epithelial and mesenchymal elements. Most of the gynecological (uterine and ovarian) carcinosarcomas have a monoclonal origin [103], as the mutations identified were present in both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components [104]. Carcinomatous cells transform into sarcomatous cells [105,106,107]. Heterogeneous molecular features observed in uterine carcinosarcomas resemble those observed in endometrial carcinomas, with some showing endometrioid carcinoma-like and others showing serous carcinoma-like mutation profiles [104]. Frequent mutations observed in uterine carcinosarcomas are similar to endometrioid and serous uterine carcinomas [108]. Thus, carcinosarcoma may derive from endometrioid or serous carcinoma.

5. Newly Proposed Hypothesis on Pathogenesis of Retroperitoneal Carcinomas

Like the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinomas, the pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas may differ by histologic subtype, considering their similarity in morphology and gender preference. A major shortcoming of the previously proposed hypotheses is that they consider all histologic subtypes to have a common pathogenesis. Although the theory of coelomic metaplasia cannot be excluded, new theories of the pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas reflecting the new paradigm of ovarian carcinogenesis can be postulated (Figure 1).

5.1. Mucinous Carcinoma

Origins of retroperitoneal mucinous tumors may be primordial germ cells and Walthard cell nests like ovarian mucinous tumors. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous carcinomas have immunohistochemical staining patterns similar to those of ovarian mucinous tumors [109], and mucinous tumors develop in both women and men, as well as teratoma that is of germ cell origin. The migration of primordial germ cells in the embryo starts from the dorsal wall of the yolk sac. Then primordial germ cells migrate into the midgut and hindgut, passing through the dorsal mesentery into the gonadal ridges. Thus, mucinous tumors can arise from primordial germ cells that stopped anywhere in the retroperitoneal space. Mucinous carcinomas arising from a retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma have been reported [110,111].
Mucinous tumors also arise from sites of transitional cell metaplasia, known as Walthard cell nests [112,113], from which Brenner tumors are believed to derive. The tuboperitoneal junction cells that undergo transitional cell metaplasia and invaginate into the paratubal or ovarian surface form Walthard cell nests [112,114]. Walthard cell nests may derive from the fallopian tube, since fallopian tube secretory cells, transitional metaplasia, Walthard cell nests, and the epithelial component of Brenner tumors share a similar immunohistochemical profile [114]. Thus, mucinous tumors may also arise from the embryological remnant of the Müllerian duct [115]. Some mucinous tumors may develop from a Brenner tumor, as a shared clonal relationship between the mucinous and Brenner tumor components has been demonstrated [116]. In these cases, the Brenner tumor component becomes compressed and obliterated by an expanding mucinous neoplasm [116].

5.2. Serous Carcinoma

The pathogenesis of retroperitoneal serous carcinomas appears to be associated with endosalpingiosis. Although endosalpingiosis and endometriosis occur concurrently in 34% of endosalpingiosis cases [117], endosalpingiosis is not a variant of endometriosis as they have different clinical presentations [117]. Endosalpingiosis is not significantly associated with infertility or chronic pain and its incidence increases with age [118], with 40% of endosalpingiosis cases being postmenopausal [117].
Endosalpingiosis, as well as retroperitoneal serous carcinomas, can be divided into non-nodal and nodal lesions. Non-nodal endosalpingiosis is observed in the peritoneum and subperitoneal tissues [117]. In the peritoneal cavity, endosalpingiosis is observed in the ovary, fallopian tube, uterus, omentum, small bowel, and sigmoid colon [117]. Its prevalence is 7.6% in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic conditions [119]. However, a recent study reported that, among benign-appearing adnexal lesions evaluated using the Sectioning and Extensive Examining-Fimbria protocol, the prevalence of endosalpingiosis was 22% [118]. Müllerian inclusions in lymph nodes, which are usually identical to endosalpingiosis [120], occur in pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes in 11–23% of women [120,121,122].
The pathogenic mechanism of endosalpingiosis remains unclear. Two major theories are postulated, namely, the tubal escape theory and the Müllerian metaplasia theory [92,123]. In the tubal escape theory, shed tubal epithelium either implants on the peritoneal surface or disseminates via lymphatics into a lymph node [123]. Tubal epithelia are easily sloughed off by tubal inflammation, tubal lavage, or salpingectomy [122]. In the Müllerian metaplasia theory, latent cells present in ectopic locations outside the Müllerian tract (fallopian tube, endometrium, endocervix) retain the capacity for forming benign tubal-type glands [92]. Endosalpingiosis that arises from the embryological remnant of the Müllerian duct may be an origin of retroperitoneal serous carcinoma, especially in men [123]. In addition, endosalpingiosis may be caused by the dislocation of primitive tubal tissue outside the fallopian tube during organogenesis, as well as endometriosis [53].
Endosalpingiosis appears to be a latent precursor to low-grade pelvic serous carcinomas [124] and prone to neoplastic transformation, as it represents cancer driver mutations that are observed in ovarian low-grade serous tumor [125]. Endosalpingiosis is associated with ovarian and uterine cancers [80]. Patients with endosalpingiosis and ovarian cancer have the increased prevalence of serous borderline, invasive mucinous, and clear cell carcinomas [80]. Atypical endosalpingiosis, i.e., lesions exhibiting architectural changes and/or cytologic atypia intermediate between endosalpingiosis and serous borderline tumor, is observed either mesothelial or submesothelial in location [126]. From lymph node inclusions, low-grade serous tumors (low-grade serous carcinoma and borderline serous tumor) have been reported to develop [120,122,127,128].
Although low-grade serous tumor and high-grade serous carcinoma are two distinct diseases, low-grade serous carcinoma may transform into high-grade serous carcinoma in rare cases [129,130,131]. A morphologic continuum between the low-grade tumors and high-grade carcinoma was observed in four cases [129]. The same mutation of KRAS was found in both the serous borderline tumor and the high-grade serous carcinoma components of the tumor in two cases [129]. In addition, TP53 and NRAS mutations are important in high-grade transformation [131,132]. Of note, endosalpingiosis is associated with germline BRCA mutation [124].
Serous carcinoma and endosalpingiosis can develop in men [25,123]. These lesions may originate from Müllerian cell rests remaining after regression of the Müllerian duct. During fetal development, before the secretion of anti-Müllerian hormone by the fetal testes, the Müllerian ducts develop in male fetuses [133]. Thus, Müllerian tissue may remain in a male body. Endometriosis can also develop in men who had been treated with prolonged estrogen therapy for prostate cancer or diagnosed as cirrhosis [134,135]. In addition, a man with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome, a rare form of internal male pseudo-hermaphroditism characterized by the presence of a rudimentary Müllerian duct in an otherwise phenotypically and genotypically normal man [136], was reported to develop clear cell carcinoma of the remnant uterus [137].
A few cases of retroperitoneal serous carcinoma may not be primary but metastasis from adnexal or peritoneal carcinoma [18,20,26]. Instead, these patients may be cancer-prone individuals and they developed double primary carcinoma as they had a BRCA mutation-related cancer, breast and peritoneal. In ovarian serous borderline tumors, nodal foci of serous borderline tumor have been suggested to derive from nodal endosalpingiosis independent of ovarian tumors [122].

5.3. Endometrioid Carcinoma

Retroperitoneal endometrioid carcinoma appears to arise from endometriosis of the urinary tract and lymph nodes. Endometrioid tumors are the majority of extragonadal endometriosis-associated carcinomas [138]. Tumors arising in endometriosis are predominantly low-grade and confined to the site of origin [138]. Pelvic surgery may affect the development of retroperitoneal endometrioid carcinoma. In addition, estrogen replacement therapy may promote malignant transformation in endometriosis [139,140]. Two patients who underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy developed retroperitoneal endometrioid carcinoma in the peri-ureter site after estrogen replacement therapy (Table 3) [30,31].
Endometrioid carcinoma may also arise in the lymph nodes and it appears to develop from nodal endometriosis. Endometriosis is believed to disseminate via the lymphatic system [141]. Metastatic endometriosis lesions in pelvic sentinel lymph nodes were present in women with ovarian and/or pelvic endometriosis [142]. Interestingly, both of the patients who developed endometrioid carcinoma in the pelvic lymph nodes had Lynch syndrome [33,34]. Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, i.e., MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, related to an increased risk of developing colorectal, endometrial, and ovarian cancers [143]. Thus, the malignant transformation of endometriosis in the lymph nodes in women with Lynch syndrome may be likely to occur.
Instead, endometrioid carcinoma in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes may be metastatic lesions from endometrial carcinoma that regresses spontaneously. Pelvic lymph node metastasis was observed in 3.5% of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas with superficial myometrial invasion, even in carcinoma without myometrial invasion [144]. In endometrial cancer, especially endometrioid carcinoma, the vanishing cancer phenomenon has been known to occur [145,146]. A cause of spontaneous regression may be an anti-tumor immune response. Among various cancers, MMR deficiency is most often observed in endometrial carcinoma [147]. MMR-deficient endometrial carcinomas, in particular Lynch syndrome-associated carcinoma, have a high number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [148], as these cancer cells accumulate somatic mutations that are associated with neoantigen production and result in strong immunoreactions [149]. Recently, the spontaneous regression of MMR-deficient colon cancer in three patients was reported [150,151,152]. In one of these patients, a metastatic lymph node was histologically confirmed while a cancerous lesion in the colon, which was observed in a biopsy specimen, could not be detected in the colectomy specimen [151].

5.4. Clear Cell Carcinoma

Clear cell carcinoma is another endometriosis-associated carcinoma and may arise in both retroperitoneal endometriosis and lymph nodes. A case who underwent supracervical hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and received 4 years of estrogen therapy developed clear cell carcinoma arising in retroperitoneal endometriosis [35]. This case may also suggest that estrogen replacement may be a risk factor for developing endometriosis-associated cancer [139]. In men, retroperitoneal clear cell carcinoma may be a metastatic disease from renal clear cell carcinoma in the absence of a primary tumor in the kidneys (carcinoma of unknown primary) (Table 3) [36,38]. In these cases, primary renal cell carcinoma might regress spontaneously [153,154].

5.5. Carcinosarcoma

Retroperitoneal carcinosarcoma, as well as uterine carcinosarcoma [108], may derive from serous or endometrioid carcinoma. In ovarian carcinosarcoma, frequently encountered epithelial components are serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated carcinomas [155]. Of the three retroperitoneal carcinosarcomas, one was associated with endometriosis that is known to be associated with the development of endometrioid carcinoma [41]. Another case developed retroperitoneal carcinosarcoma seven years after surgery for bilateral serous ovarian carcinoma. In that case, retroperitoneal carcinosarcoma may derive from an occult metastatic lesion of previous serous ovarian carcinoma. The remaining case might arise from germ cells in the remnants of the urogenital ridge [39]. Carcinosarcoma can also arise in a cystic teratoma [156].

6. Retroperitoneal Carcinoma as a Part of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

Part of carcinomas of unknown primary may be a primary retroperitoneal carcinoma. Carcinoma of unknown primary represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which a standard diagnostic work-up fails to identify the site of origin at the time of diagnosis [157]. Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary are categorized into two prognostic subgroups according to their clinicopathologic characteristics. The majority of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (80–85%) belong to unfavorable subsets. In this subset, two prognostic groups are identified according to LDH level and the performance status [158,159]. The favorable risk cancer subgroup (15–20%) includes patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of unknown primary. Very recently, new favorable subsets of carcinoma of unknown primary seem to emerge, including colorectal, lung, and renal carcinoma of unknown primary [159]. Although the incidence of carcinoma of unknown primary is decreasing, probably due to advanced diagnosis, it accounts for 2–5% of newly diagnosed advanced malignancies [158]. Metastatic adenocarcinoma is the most common histopathology [160].
Carcinoma in the lymph node diagnosed as a carcinoma of unknown primary may be a primary carcinoma that derives from endosalpingiosis or endometriosis in the node. Serous carcinomas in the inguinal node have been reported [161,162]. In addition, atypical hyperplasia with noninvasive, well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma and high-grade serous carcinoma within a focus of endometriosis in an inguinal mass in a young woman has been reported [163]. In addition, cases with a primary tumor regressing spontaneously and lymph node metastasis remaining may be diagnosed as a carcinoma of unknown primary.

7. Clinical Management

7.1. Diagnosis

Retroperitoneal carcinomas are difficult to diagnose, as they have no characteristic symptoms and signs. They cannot be diagnosed until tumors cause symptoms or become palpable. Symptoms commonly associated with retroperitoneal mucinous tumors include abdominal pain and palpable mass (Table 1) [8,164]. For retroperitoneal serous carcinomas, the most common symptom was abdominal pain (Table 2) (6/17, 35%). Of note, four patients (4/17, 24%) were asymptomatic. Regular check-ups using imaging studies or tumor marker evaluation may incidentally detect retroperitoneal carcinomas in asymptomatic patients.
Making a correct preoperative diagnosis of retroperitoneal carcinomas is difficult and a definitive diagnosis can only be made at surgery. However, cross sectional imaging studies, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, can demonstrate important characteristics of the tumors, such as lesion location, size, shape, and thickness of a wall. However, the precise localization of the lesions, determination of the extent of invasion, and characterization of the histological subtype are difficult [165]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may be useful for the discrimination of malignant and benign masses [29,166]. In addition, PET/CT is an effective method for the detection of unknown primary tumors [167]. For the diagnosis of retroperitoneal serous carcinoma, the evaluation of serum CA-125 appears to be useful, as 90% of the cases had an elevated level (Table 2).

7.2. Treatment

Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment of retroperitoneal carcinoma. A surgical approach is necessary to definitively diagnose these tumors. Complete tumor resection, in particular without rupture of the capsule, appears to be required to improve outcomes [168,169]. In young women with a desire to spare fertility, excision of only the tumor should be considered, when the tumor remains confined to the retroperitoneum and is well- to moderately-differentiated [170]. In patients with non-mucinous retroperitoneal carcinoma, in particular serous carcinoma, a thorough exploration of the abdominal cavity is mandatory, as the coexistence of diaphragmatic implants and peritoneal recurrence after tumor resection has been reported [18,19]. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with hysterectomy may be performed in patients with non-mucinous carcinomas, as concurrent adnexal serous carcinoma including intraepithelial carcinoma may exist [20,26]. Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal tumors is feasible, but the long-term safety is not fully evaluated [24,28,163]. For women who developed retroperitoneal tumors during pregnancy, the timing of surgery should be determined by both malignancy risk and obstetric considerations [168].
The necessity for chemotherapy after surgery appears to depend on histological subtype. Mucinous carcinoma is known to be relatively chemoresistant [171], thus adjuvant chemotherapy may not be necessary when the tumor is resected completely. In non-mucinous carcinomas, a retroperitoneal tumor may not be primary but metastasis from clinically undetectable primary tumors, thus adjuvant treatments should be considered. As the majority of retroperitoneal serous carcinomas are high-grade, adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and carboplatin should be administered [20,22,23,25,26,29], as well as its ovarian counterpart. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of retroperitoneal carcinomas is uncertain.

7.3. Prognosis

Although long-term follow-up data are not available for many cases of retroperitoneal carcinomas, treatment outcomes appear to differ by histological subtype. Mucinous tumors are usually associated with a favorable prognosis, except those with mural nodules that are often diagnosed as sarcoma, anaplastic carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma [172,173]. Five-year disease-specific survival of patients with retroperitoneal mucinous carcinoma was 75% [8]. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduced survival in mucinous carcinoma [8,9], suggesting that patients at high-risk for recurrence were more likely to receive chemotherapy. In contrast, patients with retroperitoneal serous carcinoma have poor survival. Two- and 5-year disease-free survival was 53% and 18%, respectively (Figure 2). However, retroperitoneal serous carcinoma of nodal type may have a favorable survival [29], similar to patients with serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, who have lymph node metastasis and minimal peritoneal disease [174,175]. Extragonadal endometriosis-associated carcinomas are associated with a favorable survival when the tumor was confined to the extragonadal site of origin, with a 5-year survival of 100% [138]. For retroperitoneal carcinomas, of the eight patients with endometrioid or clear cell tumors, only one patient who may have a primary renal cell carcinoma developed recurrence (Table 3).

8. Conclusions

Although many hypotheses are discussed in this review, the exact pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas remains to be elucidated. Retroperitoneal carcinomas may not originate in the coelomic epithelium but in the Müllerian epithelium, as well as ovarian carcinomas [176]. The secondary Müllerian system, which refers to the presence of Müllerian epithelium outside the indigenous locations, has been proposed [177] and this system may be an origin of ovarian carcinomas [178], endometriosis [179], endosalpingiosis [180], and retroperitoneal carcinomas [9,31,45,54]. However, this notion remains unverified [176]. Coelomic metaplasia may have been considered the most plausible hypothesis of retroperitoneal carcinogenesis, but direct evidence may not exist to support this theory at present. However, as ovarian serous carcinomas originate from both fallopian tube epithelium and ovarian surface epithelium [84,88,89], there is a possibility that retroperitoneal carcinomas develop directly from the abdominal and pelvic peritoneum that invaginates into the retroperitoneal space.
Endosalpingiosis and endometriosis are both involved in the development of ovarian, peritoneal, and retroperitoneal carcinomas [81,95,124,125,181,182]. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of these diseases, in particular endosalpingiosis, is poorly understood. Although endosalpingiosis resembles tubal epithelium, it is associated with the development of not only serous tumors, but also mucinous carcinomas [81]. Endosalpingiosis may be a hereditary disease, similar to endometriosis [183], as endosalpingiosis is associated with BRCA mutation [124]. In addition, patients with endosalpingiosis had lower overall survival than patients with endometriosis [81]. Are shed epithelial cells of the fallopian tube a cause of endosalpingiosis and/or a precursor of both peritoneal and retroperitoneal carcinomas? If so, what is the difference between cells that become a peritoneal carcinoma and those that become a retroperitoneal carcinoma? Further studies on the pathogenesis of retroperitoneal, peritoneal, and ovarian carcinomas are necessary, as well as on endosalpingiosis and endometriosis.

Funding

The APC was funded by Kameda Medical Center. This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank his colleagues at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kameda Medical Center for their help.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otsuka, I. Development and rapid growth of retroperitoneal leiomyoma during carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in an ovarian cancer patient. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 231, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Neville, A.; Herts, B.R. CT Characteristics of Primary Retroperitoneal Neoplasms. Crit. Rev. Comput. Tomogr. 2004, 45, 247–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pinson, C.W.; ReMine, S.G.; Fletcher, W.S.; Braasch, J.W. Long-term results with primary retroperitoneal tumors. Arch. Surg. 1989, 124, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Crum, C.P. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: Theories and realities. Mol. Oncol. 2009, 3, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.M. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: A proposed unifying theory. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010, 34, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prat, J. New insights into ovarian cancer pathology. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23 (Suppl. S10), x111–x117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuhn, E.; Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.M. Ovarian cancer is an imported disease: Fact or fiction? Curr. Obs. Gynecol. Rep. 2012, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Myriokefalitaki, E.; Luqman, I.; Potdar, N.; Brown, L.; Steward, W.; Moss, E.L. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (PRMCa): A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 2016, 293, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wolf, B.; Kunert, C.; Horn, L.C.; Einenkel, J. Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Tumors. A Retrospective Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2017, 27, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roma, A.A.; Malpica, A. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous tumors: A clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2009, 33, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sonntag, B.; Lelle, R.J.; Steinhard, J.; Brinkmann, O.A.; Hungermann, D.; Kiesel, L. Retroperitoneal mucinous adenocarcinoma occurring during pregnancy in a supernumerary ovary. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2005, 25, 515–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kashima, K.; Yahata, T.; Fujita, K.; Tanaka, K. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma associated with pregnancy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2008, 18, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hanhan, H.M.; Gungorduk, K.; Ozdemir, I.A.; Gokcu, M.; Sanci, M.; Ayaz, D.; Ozeren, M. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma during pregnancy. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2014, 34, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ulbright, T.M.; Morley, D.J.; Roth, L.M.; Berkow, R.L. Papillary serous carcinoma of the retroperitoneum. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1983, 79, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Caruncho, M.; Pombo, F.; Arnal-Monreal, F. Primary retroperitoneal serous cystadenocarcinoma of ‘ovarian type’: US and CT findings. Eur. J. Radiol. 1993, 17, 115–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kurosaki, Y.; Kuramoto, K. Case Report: Serous cystadenocarcinoma of the retroperitoneum: CT and sonographic appearance. Clin. Radiol. 1998, 53, 916–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fujiwara, K.; Oda, T.; Suzuki, S.; Kohno, I.; Hirokawa, M. Primary serous adenocarcinoma of the retroperitoneum with a response of platinum-based chemotherapy: A case report. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 1999, 9, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaku, M.; Ohara, N.; Seima, Y.; Imanishi, K.; Tomura, N.; Kobayashi, A.; Yamasaki, M.; Hirata, Y.; Murao, S. A primary retroperitoneal serous cystadenocarcinoma with clinically aggressive behavior. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 2004, 270, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Demir, M.K.; Unlu, E.; Genchellac, H.; Temizoz, O.; Ozdemir, H. Primary serous papillary carcinioma of the retroperitoneum: Magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Australas. Radiol. 2007, 51, B71–B73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iura, A.; Sasajima, Y.; Katsumata, N.; Kasamatsu, T. Serous adenocarcinoma of the retroperitoneum, as a type of multifocal müllerian carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 14, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arichi, N.; Yasumoto, H.; Mitsui, Y.; Hiraoka, T.; Honda, S.; Shiina, H.; Igawa, M. A case of primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Urol. 2011, 18, 844–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, M.M.; Zhao, X.W.; Zhao, J.; Kang, S. A case of primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma and literature review. Ann. Clin. Case. Rep. 2017, 2, 277. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kohada, Y.; Teishima, J.; Hattori, Y.; Kurimura, Y.; Fujii, S.; Sadahide, K.; Fukuoka, K.; Ueno, T.; Kitano, H.; Goto, K.; et al. Serous adenocarcinoma of retroperitoneum: A case report. Int. Cancer Conf. J. 2017, 6, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nakatake, R.; Ishizaki, M.; Ishida, M.; Matsui, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Kaibori, M. Resection for Primary Retroperitoneal Serous Adenocarcinoma and Liver Metastasis. Intern. Med. 2018, 57, 3371–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chae, Y.K.; Saleem, N.; Roh, Y.; Bilal, H.; Viveiros, P.; Sukhadia, B.; Lin, X.; Sheikh, M.M.; Park, L.C. Exceptional response to chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and immunotherapy in a male with primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Hata, C.; Yahata, N.; Isobe, M.; Kameyama, H.; Wakai, T.; Motoyama, T.; Inoue, I.; Yoshihara, K.; et al. Concurrent isolated retroperitoneal HGSC and STIC defined by somatic mutation analysis: A case report. Diagn. Pathol. 2019, 14, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Win, T.T.; Aye, S.N.; Abdul Hamad, N.S.; Emilia Tuan Sharif, S. Primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma: A case report of rare malignancy with literature review. Indian J. Cancer 2021, 58, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, L.Y.; Zhu, X.D.; Jiang, J.; Bai, Y.F.; Jiang, T.A. Added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma: A case report. BMC Med. Imaging 2021, 21, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Otsuka, I.; Honma, K. FDG PET/CT in primary retroperitoneal serous carcinoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 48, 625–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Salerno, M.G.; Masciullo, V.; Naldini, A.; Zannoni, G.F.; Vellone, V.; Scambia, G. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation arising from ureteral endometriosis in a patient with no history of gonadal endometriosis. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 99, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shibuya, H.; Nishigaya, Y.; Momomura, M.; Matsumoto, H.; Iwashita, M. Primary retroperitoneal Müllerian adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis. J. Obs. Gynaecol. Res. 2014, 40, 1823–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Osaku, D.; Taniguchi, F.; Moriyama, M.; Sato, S.; Oishi, T.; Harada, T. Retroperitoneal Endometrioid Carcinoma Arising from Ureteral Endometriosis. Case. Rep. Obs. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 9273858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koual, M.; Benoit, L.; Pacelli, J.; Belda, M.L.; Azaïs, H.; Bats, A.S. Discovery of an endometrioid cancer lymph node metastasis without primary tumor in a context of Lynch syndrome. J. Gynecol. Obs. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 50, 102060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fischerova, D.; Scovazzi, U.; Sousa, N.; Hovhannisyan, T.; Burgetova, A.; Dundr, P.; Nemejcova, K.; Bennett, R.; Vocka, M.; Fruhauf, F.; et al. Primary retroperitoneal nodal endometrioid carcinoma associated with Lynch syndrome: A case report. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1092044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brooks, J.J.; Wheeler, J.E. Malignancy arising in extragonadal endometriosis. A case report and summary of the world literature. Cancer 1977, 40, 3065–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maruschke, M.; Anastasiadis, A.G.; Hakenberg, O.W. Spontaneous Regression of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Reality or Myth? World J. Clin. Urol. 2014, 3, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vatansever, D.; Misirlioglu, S.; Arslan, T.; Zeren, E.H.; Celik, C.; Bolukbasi, Y.; Kaban, K.; Taskiran, C. Primary Retroperitoneal Müllerian Adenocarcinoma: Report of Two Cases Treated with Radical Surgery. J. Obs. Gynaecol. Can. 2021, 43, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeng, D.B.; Chang, C.; Liu, X.S.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Pei, Z.J. Magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings of retroperitoneal clear cell carcinoma with an unknown primary site: A case report. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 1024008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ferrie, R.K.; Ross, R.C. Retroperitoneal Müllerian carcinosarcoma. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1967, 97, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar]
  40. Herman, C.W.; Tessler, A.N. Extragenital mixed heterologous tumor of Müllerian type arising in retroperitoneum. Urology 1983, 22, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Booth, C.; Zahn, C.; McBroom, J.; Maxwell, G.L. Retroperitoneal Müllerian carcinosarcoma associated with endometriosis: A case report. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004, 93, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Marquez, R.T.; Baggerly, K.A.; Patterson, A.P.; Liu, J.; Broaddus, R.; Frumovitz, M.; Atkinson, E.N.; Smith, D.I.; Hartmann, L.; Fishman, D.; et al. Patterns of gene expression in different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer correlate with those in normal fallopian tube, endometrium, and colon. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 6116–6126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cameron, R.I.; Ashe, P.; O’Rourke, D.M.; Foster, H.; McCluggage, W.G. A Panel of Immunohistochemical Stains Assists in the Distinction Between Ovarian and Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2003, 22, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Elnemr, A.; Yonemura, Y.; Shinbo, M.; Nishino, E. Primary retroperitoneal Müllerian adenocarcinoma. Rare Tumors 2010, 2, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fujii, S.; Konishi, I.; Okamura, H.; Mori, T. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the retroperitoneum. A light and electron microscopic study. Gynecol. Oncol. 1986, 24, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nelson, H.; Benjamin, B.; Alberty, R. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Cancer 1988, 61, 2117–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pearl, M.L.; Valea, F.; Chumas, J.; Chalas, E. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of low malignant potential: A case report and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol. 1996, 61, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kessler, T.M.; Kessler, W.; Neuweiler, J.; Nachbur, B.H. Treatment of a case of primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma: Is adjuvant hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy justified? Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2002, 187, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Green, J.M.; Bruner, B.C.; Tang, W.W.; Orihuela, E. Retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in a man: Case report and review of the literature. Urol. Oncol. 2007, 25, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Auersperg, N. The origin of ovarian carcinomas: A unifying hypothesis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2011, 30, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Orvis, G.D.; Behringer, R.R. Cellular mechanisms of Müllerian duct formation in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 2007, 306, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. d’A Fearn, C.B. Retroperitoneal pseudomucinous cystadenoma of the ovary. Br. J. Surg. 1969, 56, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Signorile, P.G.; Baldi, F.; Bussani, R.; D’Armiento, M.; De Falco, M.; Baldi, A. Ectopic endometrium in human fetuses is a common event and sustains the theory of müllerianosis in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, a disease that predisposes to cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 28, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Erdemoglu, E.; Ayodgou, T.; Tokyol, C. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma. Acta. Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2003, 82, 486–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Karst, A.M.; Drapkin, R. Ovarian cancer pathogenesis: A model in evolution. J. Oncol. 2010, 2010, 932371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cheng, W.; Liu, J.; Yoshida, H.; Rosen, D.; Naora, H. Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancers is controlled by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dubeau, L.; Drapkin, R. Coming into focus: The nonovarian origins of ovarian cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24 (Suppl. S8), viii28–viii35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Auersperg, N.; Woo, M.M.; Gilks, C.B. The origin of ovarian carcinomas: A developmental view. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 110, 452–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salvador, S.; Gilks, B.; Köbel, M.; Huntsman, D.; Rosen, B.; Miller, D. The fallopian tube: Primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2009, 19, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.M. The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: Revisited, revised, and expanded. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shih, I.M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.L. The Origin of Ovarian Cancer Species and Precancerous Landscape. Am. J. Pathol. 2021, 191, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Purdie, D.M.; Webb, P.M.; Siskind, V.; Bain, C.J.; Green, A.C. The different etiologies of mucinous and nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 2003, 88, S145–S148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chiaffarino, F.; Parazzini, F.; Bosetti, C.; Franceschi, S.; Talamini, R.; Canzonieri, V.; Montella, M.; Ramazzotti, V.; Franceschi, S.; La Vecchia, C. Risk factors for ovarian cancer histotypes. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kurian, A.W.; Balise, R.R.; McGuire, V.; Whittemore, A.S. Histologic types of epithelial ovarian cancer: Have they different risk factors? Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 96, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jordan, S.J.; Green, A.C.; Whiteman, D.C.; Webb, P.M.; for the Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer); the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Risk factors for benign, borderline and invasive mucinous ovarian tumors: Epidemiological evidence of a neoplastic continuum? Gynecol. Oncol. 2007, 107, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Soegaard, M.; Jensen, A.; Hogdall, E.; Christensen, L.; Hogdall, C.; Blaakaer, J.; Kjaer, S.K. Different risk factor profiles for mucinous and nonmucinous ovarian cancer: Results from the Danish MALOVA study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007, 16, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Puls, L.E.; Powell, D.E.; DePriest, P.D.; Gallion, H.H.; Hunter, J.E.; Kryscio, R.J.; van Nagell, J.R., Jr. Transition from benign to malignant epithelium in mucinous and serous ovarian cystadenocarcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 1992, 47, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cheasley, D. The molecular origin and taxonomy of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fathalla, M.F. Incessant ovulation—A factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet 1971, 2, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vercellini, P.; Crosignani, P.; Somigliana, E.; Vigano, P.; Buggio, L.; Bolis, G.; Fedele, L. The ‘incessant menstruation’ hypothesis: A mechanistic ovarian cancer model with implications for prevention. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2262–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Otsuka, I. Mechanisms of high-grade serous carcinogenesis in the fallopian tube and ovary: Current hypotheses, etiologic factors, and molecular alterations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Karaman, A.; Azılı, M.N.; Boduroglu, E.C.; Karaman, I.; Erdogan, D.; Cavusoglu, Y.H.; Aslan, M.K.; Cakmak, O. A Huge Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenoma in a 14-Year-Old Premenarchal Girl: Review on Ovarian Mucinous Tumor in Premenarchal Girls. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2008, 21, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Modugno, F.; Ness, R.B.; Allen, G.O. Alcohol consumption and the risk of mucinous and nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Obs. Gynecol. 2003, 102, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar]
  74. Newcomb, P.A.; Storer, B.E.; Marcus, P.M. Cancer of the large bowel in women in relation to alcohol consumption: A case-control study in Wisconsin (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1993, 4, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Simons, M.; Simmer, F.; Bulten, J.; Lightenberg, M.J.; Hollema, H.; van Vilet, S.; de Voer, R.M.; Kamping, E.J.; van Essen, D.F.; Ylstra, B.; et al. Two types of primary mucinous ovarian tumors can be distinguished based on their origin. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vang, R.; Gown, A.M.; Zhao, C.; Barry, T.S.; Isacson, C.; Richardson, M.S.; Ronnett, B.M. Ovarian Mucinous Tumors Associated With Mature Cystic Teratomas. Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis Identifies a Subset of Potential Teratomatous Origin That Shares Features of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Mucinous Tumors More Commonly Encountered as Secondary Tumors in the Ovary. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007, 31, 854–869. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kerr, S.E.; Flotte, A.B.; McFalls, M.J.; Vrana, J.A.; Halling, K.C.; Bell, D.A. Matching maternal isodisomy in mucinous carcinomas and associated ovarian teratomas provides evidence of germ cell derivation for some mucinous ovarian tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2013, 37, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Elias, K.M.; Tsantoulis, P.; Tille, J.C.; Vitonis, A.; Doyle, L.A.; Hornick, J.L.; Kaya, G.; Barnes, L.; Cramer, D.W.; Puppa, G.; et al. Primordial germ cells as a potential shared cell of origin for mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas and mucinous ovarian tumors. J. Pathol. 2018, 246, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tafe, L.J.; Muller, K.E.; Ananda, G.; Mitchell, T.; Spotlow, V.; Patterson, S.E.; Tsongalis, G.J.; Mockus, S.M. Molecular genetic analysis of ovarian Brenner tumors and associated mucinous epithelial neoplasms: High variant concordance and identification of mutually exclusive RAS driver mutations and MYC amplification. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Esselen, K.M.; Terry, K.; Samuel, A.; Elias, K.M.; Davis, M.; Welch, W.R.; Muto, M.G.; Ng, S.W.; Berkowitz, R.S. Endosalpingiosis: More than just an incidental finding at the time of gynecologic surgery? Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 142, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lewis, G.K.; Ghaith, S.; Craver, E.C.; Li, Z.; Wasson, M.N.; Burnett, T.L.; Carrubba, A.R. The association of endosalpingiosis with gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022, 167, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kommoss, F.K.; Cheasley, D.; Wakefield, M.J.; Scott, C.L.; Campbell, I.G.; Gilks, C.B.; Gorringe, K. Primary mucinous ovarian neoplasms rarely show germ cell histogenesis. Histopathology 2021, 78, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lee, Y.; Miron, A.; Drapkin, R.; Nucci, M.R.; Medeiros, F.; Saleemuddin, A.; Garber, J.; Birch, C.; Mou, H.; Gordon, R.W.; et al. A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J. Pathol. 2007, 211, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Crum, C.P.; Drapkin, R.; Kindelberger, D.; Medeiros, F.; Miran, A.; Lee, Y. Lessons from BRCA: The tubal fimbria emerges as an origin for pelvic serous cancer. Clin. Med. Res. 2007, 5, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Otsuka, I.; Kameda, S.; Hoshi, K. Early detection of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer by examination of cytological samples from the endometrial cavity. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Otsuka, I.; Matsuura, T. Screening and prevention for high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary based on carcinogenesis—Fallopian tube- and ovarian-derived tumors and incessant retrograde bleeding. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kindelberger, D.W.; Lee, Y.; Miron, A.; Hirsch, M.S.; Feltmate, C.; Medeiros, F.; Callahan, M.J.; Garner, E.O.; Gordon, R.W.; Birch, C.; et al. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: Evidence for a causal relationship. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007, 31, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ducie, J.; Dao, F.; Considine, M.; Olvera, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Kurman, R.J.; Shih, I.M.; Soslow, R.A.; Cope, L.; Levine, D.A. Molecular analysis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with and without associated serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hao, D.; Li, J.; Jia, S.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Di, L.-j. Integrated analysis reveals tubal- and ovarian-originated serous ovarian cancer and predicts differential therapeutic responses. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7400–7411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, J.; Abushahin, N.; Pang, S.; Xiang, L.; Chambers, S.K.; Fadare, O.; Kong, B.; Zheng, W. Tubal origin of ‘ovarian’ low-grade serous carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 1488–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Banet, N.; Kurman, R.J. Two Types of Ovarian Cortical Inclusion Cysts: Proposed Origin and Possible Role in Ovarian Serous Carcinogenesis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2015, 34, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, Y.; Sessine, M.S.; Zhai, Y.; Tipton, C.; McCool, K.; Kuick, R.; Connolly, D.C.; Fearon, E.R.; Cho, K.R. Lineage tracing suggests that ovarian endosalpingiosis does not result from escape of oviductal epithelium. J. Pathol. 2019, 249, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Nezhat, F.; Cohen, C.; Rahaman, J.; Gretz, H.; Cole, P.; Kalir, T. Comparative immunohistochemical studies of Bcl-2 and p53 proteins in benign and malignant ovarian endometriotic cysts. Cancer 2002, 94, 2935–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Dinulescu, D.M.; Ince, T.A.; Quade, B.J.; Shafer, S.A.; Crowley, D.; Jacks, T. Role of K-ras and Pten in the development of mouse models of endometriosis and endometrioid ovarian cancer. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Prowse, A.H.; Manek, S.; Varma, R.; Liu, J.; Godwin, A.K.; Maher, E.R.; Tomlinson, I.P.; Kennedy, S.H. Molecular genetic evidence that endometriosis is a precursor of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Missmer, S.A. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Cochrane, D.R.; Tessier-Cloutier, B.; Lawrence, K.M.; Nazeran, T.; Karnezis, A.N.; Salamanca, C.; Cheng, A.S.; McAlpine, J.N.; Hoang, L.N.; Gilks, C.B.; et al. Clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas: Are their differences attributable to distinct cells of origin? J. Pathol. 2017, 243, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hu, Y.; Fu, K.; Liu, H.; He, Q.; Qiu, X.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y. Ovarian seromucinous carcinoma: An independent epithelial ovarian cancer? J. Ovarian Res. 2023, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yamamoto, S.; Tsuda, H.; Takano, M.; Iwaya, K.; Tamai, S.; Matsubara, O. PIK3CA mutation is an early event in the development of endometriosis-associated ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma. J. Pathol. 2011, 225, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Worley, M.J.; Welch, W.R.; Berkowitz, R.S.; Ng, S.W. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: A review of pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 5367–5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. He, H.; Zhou, G.X.; Zhou, M.; Chen, L. The Distinction of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Female Genital Tract, Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, and Translocation-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Immunohistochemical Study Using Tissue Microarray. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2011, 30, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zorn, K.K.; Bonome, T.; Gangi, L.; Chandramouli, G.V.R.; Awtrey, C.S.; Gardner, G.J.; Barrett, J.C.; Boyd, J.; Birrer, M.J. Gene expression profiles of serous, endometrioid, and clear cell subtypes of ovarian and endometrial cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 6422–6430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Thompson, L.; Chang, B.; Barsky, S.H. Monoclonal origins of malignant mixed tumors (carcinosarcomas). Evidence for a divergent histogenesis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1996, 20, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. McConechy, M.K.; Hoang, L.N.; Chui, M.H.; Senz, J.; Yang, W.; Rozenberg, N.; Mackenzie, R.; McAlpine, J.N.; Huntsman, D.G.; Clarke, B.A.; et al. In-depth molecular profiling of the biphasic components of uterine carcinosarcomas. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2015, 1, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Masuda, A.; Takeda, A.; Fukami, H.; Yamada, C.; Matsuyama, M. Characteristics of cell lines established from a mixed mesodermal tumor of the ovary. Carcinomatous cells are chnageable to sarcomatous cells. Cancer 1987, 60, 2696–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Costa, M.J.; Walls, J. Epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in female genital tract carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed Müllerian tumors). Clinicopathologic study of 82 cases. Cancer 1996, 77, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhao, S.; Bellone, S.; Lopez, S.; Thakral, D.; Schwab, C.; English, D.P.; Black, J.; Cocco, E.; Choi, J.; Zammataro, L.; et al. Mutational landscape of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas implicates histone genes in epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12238–12243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cherniack, A.D.; Shen, H.; Walter, V.; Stewart, C.; Murray, B.A.; Bowlby, R.; Hu, X.; Ling, S.; Soslow, R.A.; Broaddus, R.R.; et al. Integrated molecular characterization of uterine carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tenti, P.; Romagnoli, S.; Pellegata, N.S.; Zappatore, R.; Giunta, P.; Ranzani, G.N.; Carnevali, L. Primay retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinomas: An immunohistochemical and molecular study. Virchows Arch. 1994, 424, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Song, E.S.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, L.; Choi, S.K.; Ryu, J.S.; Lim, M.K.; Song, Y.S.; Im, M.W. Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from one retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma in a postmenopausal woman. J. Obs. Gynaecol. Res. 2005, 31, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kim, J.H.; Lee, T.S.; Oh, H.K.; Choi, Y.S. A case of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from retroperitoneal teratoma treated with chemoradiation. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 20, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Seidman, J.D.; Khedmati, F. Exploring the histogenesis of ovarian mucinous and transitional cell (Brenner) neoplasms and their relationship with Walthard cell nests: A study of 120 tumors. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008, 132, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lang, S.M.; Mills, A.M.; Cantrell, L.A. Malignant Brenner tumor of the ovary: Review and case report. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 22, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kuhn, E.; Ayhan, A.; Shih, I.E.; Seidman, J.D.; Kurman, R.J. Ovarian Brenner tumour: A morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis suggesting an origin from fallopian tube epithelium. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 3839–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sarkar, D.; Gulur, D.; Patel, S.; Nambirajan, T. An unusual presentation of a retroperitoneal cyst. BMJ Case Rep. 2014, 2014, 206284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, Y.; Wu, R.C.; Shwartz, L.E.; Haley, L.; Lin, M.T.; Shih, I.M.; Kurman, R.J. Clonality analysis of combined Brenner and mucinous tumours of the ovary reveals their monoclonal origin. J. Pathol. 2015, 237, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Prentice, L.; Stewart, A.; Mohiuddin, S.; Johnson, N.P. What is endosalpingiosis? Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sunde, J.; Wasickanin, M.; Katz, T.A.; Wickersham, E.L.; Steed, E.; Simper, N. Prevalence of endosalpingiosis and other benign gynecologic lesions. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e232487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hesseling, M.; De Wilde, R. Endosalpingiosis in laparoscopy. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 2000, 7, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Reich, O.; Tamussino, K.; Haas, J.; Winter, R. Benign Müllerian inclusions in pelvic and paraaortic lymph node. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000, 78, 242–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Moore, W.F.; Bentley, R.C.; Berchuck, A.; Robboy, S.J. Some Müllerian inclusion cysts in lymph nodes may sometimes be metastases from serous borderline tumors of the ovary. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000, 24, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Djordjevic, B.; Clement-Kruzel, S.; Atkinson, N.E.; Malpica, A. Nodal Endosalpingiosis in Ovarian Serous Tumors of Low Malignant Potential With Lymph Node Involvement: A Case for a Precursor Lesion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010, 34, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Gallan, A.J.; Antic, T. Benign Müllerian glandular inclusions in men undergoing pelvic lymph node dissection. Hum. Pathol. 2016, 57, 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Gruessner, C.; Gruessner, A.; Glaser, K.; AbuShahin, N.; Laughren, C.; Zheng, W.; Chambers, S.K. Biomarkers and endosalpingiosis in the ovarian and tubal microenvironment of women at high-risk for pelvic serous carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2014, 4, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Chui, M.H.; Shih, I.M. Oncogenic BRAF and KRAS mutations in endosalpingiosis. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Talia, K.L.; Fiorentino, L.; Scurry, L.; McCluggage, W.G. A Clinicopathologic Study and Descriptive Analysis of “Atypical Endosalpingiosis”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2020, 39, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Casey, A.C.; Berek, J.S. Papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma arising in benign glandular inclusion cysts in pelvic and inguinal lymph nodes. Obs. Gynecol. 1994, 84, 724–726. [Google Scholar]
  128. Prade, M.; Spatz, A.; Bentley, R.; Duvillard, P.; Bognel, C.; Robboy, S.J. Borderline and malignant serous tumor arising in pelvic lymph nodes: Evidence of origin in benign glandular inclusions. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1995, 14, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dehari, R.; Kurman, R.J.; Loghani, S.; Shih, I.M. The development of high-grade serous carcinoma from atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumors and low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma: A morphologic and molecular genetic analysis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007, 31, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Quddus, M.R.; Rashid, L.B.; Hansen, K.; Sung, C.J.; Lawrence, W.D. High-grade serous carcinoma arising in a low-grade serous carcinoma and micropapillary serous borderline tumour of the ovary in a 23-year-old woman. Histopathology 2009, 54, 771–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Boyd, C.; McCluggage, W.G. Low-Grade Ovarian Serous Neoplasms (Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma and Serous Borderline Tumor) Associated With High-Grade Serous Carcinoma or Undifferentiated Carcinoma: Report of a Series of Cases of an Unusual Phenomenon. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012, 36, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Emmanuel, C.; Chiew, Y.E.; George, J.; Etemadmoghadam, D.; Anglesio, M.S.; Sharma, R.; Russell, P.; Kennedy, C.; Fereday, S.; Hung, J.; et al. Genomic classification of serous ovarian cancer with adjacent borderline differentiates RAS pathway and TP53-mutant tumors and identifies NRAS as an oncogenic driver. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 6618–6630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Shah, I.A.; Jayram, L.; Gani, O.S.; Fox, I.S.; Stanley, T.M. Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in a man. Cancer 1998, 82, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Young, R.H.; Scully, R.E. Testicular and paratesticular tumors and tumor-like lesions of ovarian common epithelial and müllerian-types. A report of four cases and review of the literature. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1986, 86, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. González, R.S.; Vnencak-Jones, C.L.; Shi, C.; Fadare, O. Endomyometriosis (“Uterus-like mass”) in an XY Male: Case Report With Molecular Confirmation and Literature Review. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014, 22, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Elmas, N.Z.; Esmat, H.A.; Osmani, G.M.; Ozcan, B.; Kızıl, F. Female form of persistent Müllerian duct syndrome: A rare case report and review of literature. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 77, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shinmura, Y.; Yokoi, T.; Tsutsui, Y. A Case of Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Müllerian Duct in Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome The First Reported Case. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002, 26, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Heaps, J.M.; Nieberg, R.K.; Berek, J.S. Malignant neoplasm arising in endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 75, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zanetta, G.M.; Webb, M.J.; Li, H.; Keeney, G.L. Hyperestrogenism: A Relevant Risk Factor for the Development of Cancer from Endometriosis. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000, 79, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Modesitt, S.C.; Tortolero-Luna, G.; Robinson, J.B.; Gershenson, D.M.; Wolf, J.K. Ovarian and extraovarian endometriosis-associated cancer. Obs. Gynecol. 2002, 100, 788–795. [Google Scholar]
  141. Jerman, L.F.; Hey-Cunningham, A.J. The role of the lymphatic system in endometriosis: A comprehensive review of the literature. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 92, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tempfer, C.; Wenzl, R.; Horvat, R.; Grimm, C.; Polterauer, S.; Buekle, B.; Reinthaller, A.; Huber, J. Lymphatic spread of endometriosis to pelvic sentinel lymph nodes: A prospective clinical study. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 96, 692–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Helder-Woolderink, J.M.; Blok, E.A.; Vasen, H.F.; Hollema, H.; Mourits, M.J.; De Bock, G.H. Ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome; a systematic review. Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 55, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Otsuka, I.; Matsuura, T.; Mitani, T.; Otsuka, K.; Kanamoto, Y. Open surgery including lymphadenectomy without adjuvant therapy for uterine-confined intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 3728–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Dubé, V.; Macdonald, D.; Allingham-Hawkins, D.J.; Kamel-Reid, S.; Colgan, T.J. Vanishing endometrial carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2007, 26, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  146. Ahmed, Q.F.; Gattoc, L.; Al-Wahab, Z.; Abdulfatah, E.; Ruterbusch, J.J.; Cote, M.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Morris, R.T.; Ali-Fehmi, R. Vanishing Endometrial Cancer in Hysterectomy Specimens. A Myth or a Fact. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Le, D.T.; Durham, J.N.; Smith, K.N.; Wang, H.; Bartlett, B.R.; Aulakh, L.K.; Lu, S.; Kemberling, H.; Wilt, C.; Luber, B.S.; et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science 2017, 357, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ramchander, N.C.; Ryan, N.A.J.; Walker, T.D.J.; Harries, L.; Bolton, J.; Bosse, T.; Evans, D.G.; Crosbie, E.J. Distinct Immunological Landscapes Characterize Inherited and Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficient Endometrial Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Liu, G.C.; Liu, R.Y.; Yan, J.P.; An, X.; Jiang, W.; Ling, Y.H.; Chan, J.W.; Bei, J.X.; Zuo, X.Y.; Cai, M.Y.; et al. The heterogeneity between lynch-associated and sporadic MMR deficiency in colorectal cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018, 110, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Karakuchi, N.; Shimomura, M.; Toyota, K.; Hinoi, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Sadamoto, S.; Mandai, K.; Egi, H.; Ohdan, H.; Takahashi, T. Spontaneous regression of transverse colon cancer with high-frequency microsatellite instability: A case report and literature review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 17, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Nishiura, B.; Kumamoto, K.; Akamoto, S.; Asano, E.; Ando, Y.; Suto, H.; Kishino, T.; Oshima, M.; Fujiwara, M.; Usuki, H.; et al. Spontaneous regression of advanced transverse colon cancer with remaining lymph node metastasis. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 6, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Harata, S.; Takahashi, H.; Ando, N.; Kato, A.; Watanabe, K.; Yanagita, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ushigome, H.; Shiga, K.; Ogawa, R.; et al. Spontaneous regression of advanced transverse colon cancer with deficient mismatch repair: A case report. Surg. Case. Rep. 2023, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Srivastava, A.; Meyer, A.R.; Pierorazio, P.M.; Rowe, S.P.; Allaf, M.E.; Gorin, M.A. Spontaneous regression of a low-grade renal cell carcinoma with oncocytic features after renal mass biopsy. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, e1083–e1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Buchler, T.; Fiser, L.; Benesova, J.; Jirickova, H.; Votrubova, J. Spontaneous Regression of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Report of Two Cases. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 3403–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Boussios, S.; Karathanasi, A.; Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou, N.; Tsiouris, A.K.; Chatziantoniou, A.A.; Kanellos, F.S.; Tatsi, K. Ovarian carcinosarcoma: Current developments and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2019, 134, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Arora, D.S.; Haldane, S. Carcinosarcoma arising in a dermoid cyst of the ovary. J. Clin. Pathol. 1996, 49, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Fizazi, K.; Greco, F.A.; Pavlidis, N.; Daugaard, G.; Oien, K.; Pentheroudakis, G.; on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, v133–v138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Olivier, T.; Fernandez, E.; Labidi-Galy, I.; Dietrich, P.Y.; Rodriguez-Bravo, V.; Baciarello, G.; Fizazi, K.; Patrikidou, A. Redefining cancer of unknown primary: Is precision medicine really shifting the paradigm? Cancer Treat Rev. 2021, 97, 102204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Rassy, E.; Parent, P.; Lefort, F.; Boussios, S.; Baciarello, G.; Pavlidis, N. New rising entities in cancer of unknown primary: Is there a real therapeutic benefit? Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2020, 147, 102882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Pavlidis, N.; Pentheroudakis, G. Cancer of unknown primary site. Lancet 2012, 379, 1428–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Dam, K.; Peeters, F.; Verhoeven, D.; Duwel, V. High-grade serous cancer of undetermined primary origin presenting as solitary inguinal lymph node enlargement. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e239185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Restaino, S.; Mauro, J.; Zermano, S.; Pellecchia, G.; Mariuzzi, L.; Orsaria, M.; Titone, F.; Biasioli, A.; Martina, M.D.; Andreetta, C.; et al. CUP-syndrome: Inguinal high grade serous ovarian carcinoma lymph node metastases with unknown primary origin—A case report and literature review. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 987169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Slomovitz, B.M.; Soslow, R.A.; Chang, R.C.; Golub, R.; Kuo, D.Y.S. Serous adenocarcinoma of the inguinal region arising from endometriosis followed by a successful pregnancy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2002, 87, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, Z.; Sun, J.; Wang, P. Laparoscopic Resection and Pre-Operative Imaging of Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Neoplasms: A Retrospective Case Series. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 5451–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Nishino, M.; Hayakawa, K.; Minami, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Ueda, H.; Takasu, K. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. Radiographics 2003, 23, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Dong, A.; Zhai, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, C. MRI, Enhanced CT, FDG PET/CT in Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kwee, T.C.; Kwee, R.M. Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2009, 19, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Dayan, D.; Abu-Abeid, S.; Klausner, J.M.; Sagie, B. Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm: Authors’ Experience and Review of the Literature. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 39, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Tokai, H.; Nagata, Y.; Taniguchi, K.; Matsumura, N.; Kitasato, A.; Tokunaga, T.; Takeshita, H.; Kuroki, T.; Maeda, S.; Ito, M.; et al. The long-term survival in primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma: A case report. Surg. Case Rep. 2017, 3, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Law, K.S.; Chang, T.M.; Tung, J.N. Fertility-sparing treatment of a primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. BJOG 2006, 113, 612–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Morice, P.; Gouy SLeary, A. Mucinous ovarian carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1256–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Mikami, M.; Tei, C.; Takehara, K.; Komiyama, S.; Suzuki, A.; Hirose, T. Retroperitoneal primary mucinous adenocarcinoma with a mural nodule of anaplastic tumor: A case report and literature review. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2003, 22, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Bakker, R.F.; Stoot, J.H.; Blok, P.; Merkus, J.W.S. Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma with sarcoma-like mural nodule. A case report and review of the literature. Virchows Arch. 2007, 451, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Onda, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Yasugi, T.; Mishima, M.; Nakagawa, S.; Yamada, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Taketani, Y. Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenectomy have similar survival to stage I/II patients and superior survival to other stage III patients. Cancer 1998, 83, 1555–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Euscher, E.D.; Silva, E.G.; Deavers, M.T.; Elishaev, E.; Gershenson, D.M.; Malpica, A. Serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum presenting as lymphadenopathy. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004, 28, 1217–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Dubeau, L. The cell of origin of ovarian epithelial tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Lauchlan, S.C. The secondary Müllerian system. Obs. Gynecol. Surv. 1972, 27, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Dubeau, L. The cell of origin of ovarian epithelial tumors and the ovarian surface epithelium dogma: Does the emperor have no clothes? Gynecol. Oncol. 1999, 72, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Fujii, S. Secondary Müllerian system and endometriosis. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1991, 165, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Lauchlan, S.C. The secondary Müllerian system revisited. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1994, 13, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Yoshihara, K.; Ishiguro, T.; Tamura, R.; Mori, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Adachi, S.; Takahashi, T.; Kase, H.; et al. Clonal Expansion and Diversification of Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis and Normal Endometrium. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Hermens, M.; van Altena, A.M.; Bulten, J.; Siebers, A.G.; Bekkers, R.L.M. Increased association of ovarian cancer in women with histological proven endosalpingiosis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020, 65, 101700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Koninckx, P.R.; Ussia, A.; Adamyan, L.; Wattiez, A.; Gomel, V.; Martin, D.C. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Newly proposed pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas.
Figure 1. Newly proposed pathogenesis of retroperitoneal carcinomas.
Cancers 15 04614 g001
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier disease-free survival curve for retroperitoneal serous carcinoma.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier disease-free survival curve for retroperitoneal serous carcinoma.
Cancers 15 04614 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of retroperitoneal mucinous carcinoma.
Table 1. Characteristics of retroperitoneal mucinous carcinoma.
CharacteristicsDescription
SexFemale, 94% (73/78): Male, 6% (5/78)
Median ageFemale, 42.0 years; Male, 62.2 years
SymptomsA palpable abdominal mass, 42.9%
Abdominal pain, 23.8%
ManagementSurgery (100%)
Adjuvant chemotherapy 24.1% (13/72)
OutcomesRecurrence 40.4% (median, 8 months; 23/57)
Median disease-free survival, 15 months (range, 1–130 months)
5-year disease-specific survival, 75.4%
Data from Myriokefalitaki et al., 2016 [8]
Table 2. (Primary) retroperitoneal serous carcinomas reported in the literature.
Table 2. (Primary) retroperitoneal serous carcinomas reported in the literature.
AuthorAgeSexLocationCA125 (U/mL)Other Diseases and Health ConditionsHistologyTreatmentOutcomes
1Ulbright et al., 1983 [14]11FEncased the right common iliac vesselsNANASerousSurgery (incomplete), Chemo (CAP), RTNED,
10 months
2Caruncho, et al., 1993 [15]49FSurrounding the anterior aspects of the aorta NAPrevious H/BSO for uterine leiomyomaSerousSurgery (incomplete)NA
3Kurosaki et al., 1998 [16]38FAdherent to the lower pole of the right kidneyNANASerousSurgery (complete)NED,
24 months
4Fujiwara et al., 1999 [17]54FPara-aortic region4000NoneSerousChemo (CP), Surgery# (incomplete), RTDOD,
24 months
5Kaku et al., 2004 [18]44FPara-aortic region218Breast ca (past), LN met, Peritoneal recurrence of serous caSerous, G1Surgery (complete)AWD,
23 months
6Demir et al.,
2007 [19]
40FRight suprarenal fossaNADiaphragmatic implantsSerousSurgery (complete)NA
7Iura et al.,
2009 [20]
66FAdherent to the ileocecum (para-aortic to iliac region)678Adnexal serous ca (concurrent), peritoneal carcinomatosisHGSCSurgery# (incomplete), Chemo (TC)AWD,
32 months
8Arichi et al.,
2011 [21]
75FBetween the right kidney and liver335NoneHGSCSurgery (complete), Chemo (DC)NED,
6 months
9Zhang et al.,
2017 [22]
58FRight side of the Douglas pouch3942NoneHGSCSurgery# (complete), Chemo (TC)AWD,
30 months
10Kohada et al., 2017 [23]42FAdjacent to the lower pole of the left kidney10NoneHGSC *Surgery (complete), Chemo (TC)NED,
5 months
11Nakatake et al., 2018 [24]74FAdjacent to the liver (S6)NALiver metHGSC *Surgery (complete)NED,
12 months
12Chae et al.,
2019 [25]
71MInvading right psoas muscle and 12th ribNAProstate ca (past)HGSC *Chemo (TC), RT, immunotherapy (Niv)AWD,
15 months
13Suda et al., 2019 [26]58FMesorectum315.2Concurrent STICHGSC *Surgery# (complete), Chemo (TC + Bev)NED,
20 months
14Zhou et al.,
2021 [28]
62FDouglas cul-de-sac75NAHGSC *Surgery#, Chemo (TC)NED,
NA
15Win et al.,
2021 [27]
60FLeft pelvic cavity253EndometriosisHGSC *Surgery (incomplete), Chemo (TP)DOD,
6 months
16Otsuka et al., 2023 [29]62FCommon iliac to lower para-aortic region2789Uterine leiomyoma, LN metHGSC *Surgery# (optimal), Chemo (TC)NED,
74 months
F, female. M, male. NA, not available. NED, no evidence of disease. DOD, dead of disease. AWD, alive with disease. Surgery#, surgery including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, CAP, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, cisplatin. TC, paclitaxel, carboplatin. DC, docetaxel, carboplatin. RT, radiation therapy, Niv, nivolmab. Bev, bevacizumab. * p53 abnormality was observed. STIC, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma.
Table 3. (Primary) retroperitoneal endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas reported in the literature.
Table 3. (Primary) retroperitoneal endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas reported in the literature.
AuthorAgeSexLocationOther Diseases and Health ConditionsHistologyTreatmentOutcomes
Endometrioid carcinoma
1Salerno et al., 2005 [30]54FPeriureterEndometriosis (periureteral), previous H/BSO (serous cyst), ERTEndometrioidSurgery, Chemo (Carbo, LD)NED
12 months
2Tanaka et al., 2014 [31]52FLeft side of the bladderMalignant lymphoma (past), Endometriosis (previous H/BSO), ERTEndometrioidSurgery, ChemoNED
3 months
3Osaku et al., 2019 [32]52FPeriureter (adjacent the left ilial vessels)EndometriosisEndometrioidChemo (Carbo Pacli), Surgery#, Chemo (Carbo, LD)NED
24 months
4Koual et al., 2021 [33]50FExternal ilial lymph nodeLynch syndrome, previous cesarean sectionEndometrioidSurgery#, Chemo (Carbo, Pacli), RTNED
36 months
5Fischerova et al., 2023 [34]29FIliac lymph nodesLynch syndrome, Multiple sclerosisEndometrioidSurgery#, Chemo (Carbo, Pacli)NA
Clear cell carcinoma
1Brooks et al., 1977 [35]48FAnterior to the right ureterEndometriosis (previous H/BSO), ERTClear cellSurgery, RTNED
22 months
2Shields et al., 2020 [36]71MLeft para-aortic lymph nodeBenign prostatic hypertrophyClear cellSurgeryNED
60 months
3Vatansever et al., 2021 [37]37FAround the left internal iliac veinNoneClear cellSurgery# (complete), Chemo (Carbo, Pacli), RTNED
41 months
4Zeng et al., 2022 [38]46MNear the left renal hilumNoneClear cellSurgeryRecurrence
6 months
Mixed (Clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid, mucinous) carcinoma
1Elnemr et al., 2010 [44]46FLeft retroperitoneal cavityNoneSerous, mucinous, endometrioidSurgery, Chemo (IP Cis, Doce)Recurrence
4 months
2Vatansever et al., 2021 [37]45FAround the left external iliac veinPrevious H/BSO (for unknown reason)Clear cell, endometrioidSurgery (partial), Chemo (Carbo, Pacli), RTNED
30 months
F, female. M, male. NA, not available. H/BSO, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Surgery#, surgery including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. ERT, estrogen replacement therapy. Carbo, carboplatin. Pacli, paclitaxel. LD, liposomal doxorubicin. RT, radiation therapy. IP, intraperitoneal. Cis, cisplatin. Doce, docetaxel. NED, no evidence of disease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otsuka, I. Primary Retroperitoneal Carcinomas: New Insights into Pathogenesis and Clinical Management in Comparison with Ovarian Carcinomas and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary. Cancers 2023, 15, 4614. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184614

AMA Style

Otsuka I. Primary Retroperitoneal Carcinomas: New Insights into Pathogenesis and Clinical Management in Comparison with Ovarian Carcinomas and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary. Cancers. 2023; 15(18):4614. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otsuka, Isao. 2023. "Primary Retroperitoneal Carcinomas: New Insights into Pathogenesis and Clinical Management in Comparison with Ovarian Carcinomas and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary" Cancers 15, no. 18: 4614. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop