The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Baseline and Staging
2.1. Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes: N Stage
2.2. Metastatic Disease: M Stage
3. Follow-Up and Recurrence
3.1. Imaging for Active Surveillance
3.2. Response to Therapy and Post Therapeutic Changes
3.3. Recurrence
3.4. Surveillance Imaging Modality: CT versus MRI
3.5. Surveillance Programs and Future Perspectives
4. Pitfalls
4.1. Small-Volume Disease
4.1.1. Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes
4.1.2. Small Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes
Positive Lymph Nodes
Negative Lymph Nodes
4.1.3. Different Features of Lung Metastases
4.2. Post-Chemotherapy Lymph Nodes Changes
4.3. Teratoma, Growing Teratoma, and Transformed Teratoma
4.3.1. Mature Teratoma
4.3.2. Growing Teratoma
4.3.3. Transformed Teratoma
4.4. False-Positive Diagnoses
4.4.1. Mediastinal Metastatic Lymph Node or Differential Diagnoses?
4.4.2. Retroperitoneal Lymph Node or Lymphocele?
4.4.3. Teratoma versus Lymphocele
4.5. Post-Treatment Complications
4.5.1. Bleomycin-Induced Pneumonitis
4.5.2. Post-Surgical Complications
4.5.3. Residual Disease after Surgery
4.6. Retroperitoneal Differential Diagnoses
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Garner, M.J.; Turner, M.C.; Ghadirian, P.; Krewski, D. Epidemiology of testicular cancer: An overview. Int. J. Cancer. 2005, 116, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Cancer Research Fund. Worldwide Cancer Data: Global Cancer Statistics for the Most Common Cancers. Available online: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/worldwide-cancer-data (accessed on 21 January 2022).
- Jacobsen, G.K.; Barlebo, H.; Olsen, J.; Schultz, H.P.; Starklint, H.; Søgaard, H.; Væth, M.; Group, D.S. Testicular Germ Cell Tumours in Denmark 1976–1980 Pathology of 1058 Consecutive Cases. Acta Radiol. Oncol. 1984, 23, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; McGlynn, K.A.; Okamoto, K.; Jewett, M.A.; Bokemeyer, C. Testicular germ cell tumours. Lancet 2016, 387, 1762–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crocetto, F.; Arcaniolo, D.; Napolitano, L.; Barone, B.; La Rocca, R.; Capece, M.; Caputo, V.F.; Imbimbo, C.; De Sio, M.; Calace, F.P.; et al. Impact of Sexual Activity on the Risk of Male Genital Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 8500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bräuner, E.V.; Lim, Y.H.; Koch, T.; Uldbjerg, C.S.; Gregersen, L.S.; Pedersen, M.K.; Frederiksen, H.; Petersen, J.H.; Coull, B.A.; Andersson, A.-M.; et al. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e4834–e4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, T.J.; Croughan, M.S.; Schembri, M.; Chan, J.M.; Turek, P.J. Increased Risk of Testicular Germ Cell Cancer among Infertile Men. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilligan, T.D.; Seidenfeld, J.; Basch, E.M.; Einhorn, L.H.; Fancher, T.; Smith, D.C.; Stephenson, A.J.; Vaughn, D.J.; Cosby, R.; Hayes, D.F. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males with Germ Cell Tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 3388–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Einhorn, L.H. Curing metastatic testicular cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4592–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogra, V.S.; Gottlieb, R.H.; Oka, M.; Rubens, D.J. Sonography of the Scrotum. Radiology 2003, 227, 18–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EAU Guidelines Testicular Cancer. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2022. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5. Available online: http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
- Thomas, K.L.; Jeong, D.; Montilla-Soler, J.; Feuerlein, S. The role of diagnostic imaging in the primary testicular cancer: Initial staging, response assessment and surveillance. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2020, 9, S3–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kreydin, E.I.; Barrisford, G.W.; Feldman, A.S.; Preston, M.A. Testicular Cancer: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2013, 200, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sohaib, S.A.; Koh, D.M.; Husband, J.E. The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Testicular Cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008, 191, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, M.B.; Greene, F.L.; Edge, S.B.; Compton, C.C.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Brookland, R.K.; Meyer, L.; Gress, D.M.; Byrd, D.R.; Winchester, D.P. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging: The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winter, C.; Albers, P. Testicular germ cell tumors: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mead, G.M.; Stenning, S.P.; Cook, P.; Fossa, S.D.; Horwich, A.; Kaye, S.B.; Coppin, C. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: A prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997, 15, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beyer, J.; Collette, L.; Sauvé, N.; Daugaard, G.; Feldman, D.R.; Tandstad, T.; Tryakin, A.; Stahl, O.; Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, E.; de Giorgi, U.; et al. International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium, Survival and New Prognosticators in Metastatic Seminoma: Results From the IGCCCG-Update Consortium. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gillessen, S.; Sauvé, N.; Collette, L.; Daugaard, G.; de Wit, R.; Albany, C.; Tryakin, A.; Fizazi, K.; Stahl, O.; Gietema, J.A.; et al. Predicting Outcomes in Men with Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors (NSGCT): Results From the IGCCCG Update Consortium. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1563–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, G.R.; Teplitsky, S.; Truong, H.; Gold, S.A.; Bloom, J.B.; Agarwal, P.K. Lymph node imaging in testicular cancer. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2018, 7, 864–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donohue, J.P.; Zachary, J.M.; Maynard, B.R. Distribution of Nodal Metastases in Nonseminomatous Testis Cancer. J. Urol. 1982, 128, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Shea, A.; Kilcoyne, A.; Hedgire, S.S.; Harisinghani, M.G. Pelvic lymph nodes and pathways of disease spread in male pelvic malignancies. Abdom. Radiol. 2020, 45, 2198–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ray, B.; Hajdu, S.I.; Whitmore, W.F. Distribution of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular germinal tumors. Cancer 1974, 33, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamieson, J.K.; Dobson, J.F. The lymphatics of the testicle. Lancet 1910, 175, 493–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, A.K.; Ellis, M.; Sikora, K. Computed tomography of testicular tumours: Distribution of abdominal lymphadenopathy. Clin. Radiol. 1986, 37, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilton, S.; Herr, H.W.; Teitcher, J.B.; Begg, C.B.; Castéllino, R.A. CT detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: Assessment of size and distribution criteria. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997, 169, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stomper, P.; Fung, C.; Socinski, M.; Jochelson, M.; Garnick, M.; Richie, J. Detection of retroperitoneal metastases in early-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer: Analysis of different CT criteria. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987, 149, 1187–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lien, H.H.; Stenwig, A.E.; Ous, S.; Fosså, S.D. Influence of Different Criteria for Abnormal Lymph Node Size on Reliability of Computed Tomography in Patients with Non-Seminomatous Testicular Tumor. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1986, 27, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudolin, T.; Kastelan, Z.; Knezevic, N.; Goluza, E.; Tomas, D.; Coric, M. Correlation Between Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Size and Presence of Metastases in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012, 20, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMahon, C.J.; Rofsky, N.M.; Pedrosa, I. Lymphatic Metastases from Pelvic Tumors: Anatomic Classification, Characterization, and Staging. Radiology 2010, 254, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohaib, S.A.; Koh, D.M.; Barbachano, Y.; Parikh, J.; Husband, J.E.S.; Dearnaley, D.P.; Horwich, A.; Huddart, R. Prospective assessment of MRI for imaging retroperitoneal metastases from testicular germ cell tumours. Clin. Radiol. 2009, 64, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, A.; Robson, N.; Tung, K.; Mead, G. Patterns of supradiaphragmatic metastases in testicular germ cell tumours. Clin. Radiol. 1996, 51, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murez, T.; Fléchon, A.; Savoie, P.-H.; Rocher, L.; Camparo, P.; Morel-Journel, N.; Ferretti, L.; Méjean, A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU—Actualisation 2020–2022: Tumeurs germinales du testicule. Prog. En Urol. 2020, 30, S280–S313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oldenburg, J.; Berney, D.M.; Bokemeyer, C.; Climent, M.A.; Daugaard, G.; Gietema, J.A.; de Giorgi, U.; Haugnes, H.S.; Huddart, R.A.; Leão, R.; et al. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2022, 33, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Warde, P.; Specht, L.; Horwich, A.; Oliver, T.; Panzarella, T.; Gospodarowicz, M.; von der Maase, H. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: A pooled analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 4448–4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daugaard, G.; Gundgaard, M.G.; Mortensen, M.S.; Agerbæk, M.; Holm, N.V.; Rørth, M.; von der Maase, H.; Christensen, I.J.; Lauritsen, J. Surveillance for stage I nonseminoma testicular cancer: Outcomes and long-term follow-up in a population-based cohort. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 3817–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groll, R.J.; Warde, P.; Jewett, M.A.S. A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2007, 64, 182–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fizazi, K.; Pagliaro, L.; Laplanche, A.; Fléchon, A.; Mardiak, J.; Geoffrois, L.; Kerbrat, P.; Chevreau, C.; Delva, R.; Rolland, F.; et al. Personalised chemotherapy based on tumour marker decline in poor prognosis germ-cell tumours (GETUG 13): A phase 3, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1442–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loriot, Y.; Texier, M.; Culine, S.; Flechon, A.; Nguyen, T.; Gravis, G.; Geoffrois, L.; Chevreau, C.; Gross-Goupil, M.; Barthelemy, P.; et al. The SEMITEP trial: De-escalating chemotherapy in low-volume metastatic seminoma based on early FDG-PET. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhauer, E.A.; Therasse, P.; Bogaerts, J.; Schwartz, L.H.; Sargent, D.; Ford, R.; Dancey, J.; Arbuck, S.; Gwyther, S.; Mooney, M.; et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 228–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connor, S.; Guest, P. Conversion of multiple solid testicular teratoma metastases to fatty and cystic liver masses following chemotherapy: CT evidence of “maturation”. Br. J. Radiol. 1999, 72, 1114–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fosså, S.D.; Qvist, H.; Stenwig, A.E.; Lien, H.H.; Ous, S.; Giercksky, K.E. Is postchemotherapy retroperitoneal surgery necessary in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer and minimal residual tumor masses? J. Clin. Oncol. 1992, 10, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Santis, M.; Becherer, A.; Bokemeyer, C.; Stoiber, F.; Oechsle, K.; Sellner, F.; Lang, A.; Kletter, K.; Dohmen, B.M.; Dittrich, C.; et al. 2- 18 fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is a Reliable Predictor for Viable Tumor in Postchemotherapy Seminoma: An Update of the Prospective Multicentric SEMPET Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, C.R. Testicular cancer. Curr. Probl. Cancer 1998, 22, 187–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oldenburg, J.; Martin, J.M.; Fosså, S.D. Late Relapses of Germ Cell Malignancies: Incidence, Management, and Prognosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 5503–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pierorazio, P.M.; Albers, P.; Black, P.C.; Tandstad, T.; Heidenreich, A.; Nicolai, N.; Nichols, C. Non-risk-adapted Surveillance for Stage I Testicular Cancer: Critical Review and Summary. Eur. Urol. 2018, 73, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kollmannsberger, C.; Tandstad, T.; Bedard, P.L.; Cohn-Cedermark, G.; Chung, P.W.; Jewett, M.A.; Powles, T.; Warde, P.R.; Daneshmand, S.; Protheroe, A.; et al. Patterns of relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer managed with active surveillance. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, J.M.; Panzarella, T.; Zwahlen, D.R.; Chung, P.; Warde, P. Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma. Cancer 2007, 109, 2248–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van As, N.J.; Gilbert, D.C.; Money-Kyrle, J.; Bloomfield, D.; Beesley, S.; Dearnaley, D.P.; Horwich, A.; Huddart, R.A. Evidence-based pragmatic guidelines for the follow-up of testicular cancer: Optimising the detection of relapse. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 1894–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Travis, L.B.; Fosså, S.D.; Schonfeld, S.J.; McMaster, M.L.; Lynch, C.F.; Storm, H.; Hall, P.; Holowaty, E.; Andersen, A.; Pukkala, E.; et al. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: Focus on long-term survivors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 1354–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laukka, M.; Mannisto, S.; Beule, A.; Kouri, M.; Blomqvist, C. Comparison between CT and MRI in detection of metastasis of the retroperitoneum in testicular germ cell tumors: A prospective trial. Acta Oncol. 2020, 59, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, S.K.A.; Agerbæk, M.; Jurik, A.G.; Pedersen, E.M. Ten years of experience with MRI follow-up of testicular cancer stage I: A retrospective study and an MRI protocol with DWI. Acta Oncol. Stockh. Swed. 2020, 59, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortiz, A.F.H.; Beaujon, L.J.F.; Villamizar, S.Y.G.; López, F.F.F. Magnetic resonance versus computed tomography for the detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis due to testicular cancer: A systematic literature review. Eur. J. Radiol. Open. 2021, 8, 100372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brenner, D.J.; Hall, E.J. Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 2277–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wakileh, G.A.; Ruf, C.; Heidenreich, A.; Dieckmann, K.-P.; Lisson, C.; Prasad, V.; Bolenz, C.; Zengerling, F. Contemporary options and future perspectives: Three examples highlighting the challenges in testicular cancer imaging. World J. Urol. 2022, 40, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joffe, J.K.; Cafferty, F.H.; Murphy, L.; Rustin, G.J.S.; A Sohaib, S.; Swift, S.; Noor, D.; Wade, S.; James, E.; Gabe, R.; et al. The TRISST Trial Management Group, Imaging modality and frequency in surveillance of stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Results from a randomized, phase III, factorial trial (TRISST). J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logothetis, C.J.; Samuels, M.L.; Trindade, A.; Johnson, D.E. The growing teratoma syndrome. Cancer 1982, 50, 1629–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, D.B.; la Rosa, F.G.; Craig, P.G.; Khani, F.; Lam, E.T. Metastatic Mature Teratoma and Growing Teratoma Syndrome in Patients with Testicular Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors. Korean J. Radiol. 2021, 22, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priod, F.; Lorge, F.; Di Gregorio, M.; Dupont, M.V.; Nollevaux, M.-C.; Faugeras, L.; Lawson, G.; Eucher, P.; D’Hondt, L. Recurrent Masses after Testicular Cancer: Growing Teratoma Syndrome. A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep. Oncol. 2017, 10, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pisters, L.; Gorbatiy, V.; Spiess, P. The growing teratoma syndrome: Current review of the literature. Indian J. Urol. 2009, 25, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motzer, R.J.; Amsterdam, A.; Prieto, V.; Sheinfeld, J.; Murty, V.; Mazumdar, M.; Bosl, G.J.; Chaganti, R.; Reuter, V.E. Teratoma with malignant transformation: Diverse malignant histologies arising in men with germ cell tumors. J. Urol. 1998, 159, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donadio, A.C.; Motzer, R.J.; Bajorin, D.F.; Kantoff, P.W.; Sheinfeld, J.; Houldsworth, J.; Chaganti, R.S.K.; Bosl, G.J. Chemotherapy for teratoma with malignant transformation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 4285–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- el Mesbahi, O.; Terrier-Lacombe, M.-J.; Rebischung, C.; Theodore, C.; Vanel, D.; Fizazi, K. Chemotherapy in patients with teratoma with malignant transformation. Eur. Urol. 2007, 51, 1306–1311, discussion 1311–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hollander, M.W.D.; Westerink, N.-D.L.; Lubberts, S.; Bongaerts, A.H.; Wolf, R.F.; Altena, R.; Nuver, J.; Oosting, S.F.; de Vries, E.G.; Walenkamp, A.M.; et al. Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Changes on Restaging Computed Tomography Scans in Two Thirds of Testicular Cancer Patients Show No Correlation with Fibrosis Markers. Oncologist 2016, 21, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruf, C.G.; Krampe, S.; Matthies, C.; Anheuser, P.; Nestler, T.; Simon, J.; Isbarn, H.; Dieckmann, K.P. Major complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary cohort of patients with testicular cancer and a review of the literature. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 18, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, W.; Han, L.; Wang, Q.; Batchu, N.; Ulain, Q.; Zou, J.; Sun, C.; Du, J.; et al. A review of the postoperative lymphatic leakage. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 69062–69075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajiah, P.; Sinha, R.; Cuevas, C.; Dubinsky, T.J.; Bush, W.H.; Kolokythas, O. Imaging of Uncommon Retroperitoneal Masses. RadioGraphics 2011, 31, 949–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scali, E.P.; Chandler, T.M.; Heffernan, E.J.; Coyle, J.; Harris, A.C.; Chang, S.D. Primary retroperitoneal masses: What is the differential diagnosis? Abdom. Imaging 2015, 40, 1887–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, B.; Zhang, T. Primary Retroperitoneal Ganglioneuroma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 32 Patients. Front. Surg. 2021, 8, 642451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
pT | Primary Tumor | ||
pTx | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | ||
pT0 | No evidence of primary tumor (e.g., histological scar in testis) | ||
pTis | Intratubular germ cell neoplasia (carcinoma in situ) | ||
pT1 | Tumor limited to testis and epididymis without vascular/lymphatic invasion; tumor may invade tunica albuginea but not tunica vaginalis | ||
pT2 | Tumor limited to testis and epididymis with vascular/lymphatic invasion, or tumor extending through tunica albuginea with involvement of tunica vaginalis | ||
pT3 | Tumor invades spermatic cord with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion | ||
pT4 | Tumor invades scrotum with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion | ||
N | Regional lymph nodes | ||
Nx | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed | ||
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | ||
N1 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass 2 cm or less in greatest dimension or 5 or fewer positive nodes, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension | ||
N2 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension; or more than 5 nodes positive, none more than 5 cm; or evidence of extranodal extension of tumor | ||
N3 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 5 cm in greatest dimension | ||
M | Distant Metasasis | ||
Mx | Distant metastasis cannot be assessed | ||
M0 | No distant metastasis | ||
M1 | Distant metastasis M1a Non-regional lymph node(s) or lung metastasis M1b Distant metastasis other than non-regional lymph nodes and lung | ||
S | Serum tumor markers | ||
Sx | Serum marker studies not available or not performed | ||
S0 | Serum marker study levels within normal limits | ||
LDH (U/L) | HCG (mIU/mL) | AFP (ng/mL) | |
S1 | <1.5 × N and | <5000 and | <1000 |
S2 | 1.5–10 × N or | 5000–50,000 or | 1000–10,000 |
S3 | >10 × N or | >50,000 or | >10,000 |
Stage Grouping | T | N | M | S |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 0 | pTis | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage I | pT1–T4 | N0 | M0 | SX |
Stage IA | pT1 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage IB | pT2–pT4 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage IS | Any pT/TX | N0 | M0 | S1–3 |
Stage II | Any pT/TX | N1–N3 | M0 | SX |
Stage IIA | Any pT/TX | N1 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N1 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIB | Any pT/TX | N2 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N2 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIC | Any pT/TX | N3 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N3 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage III | Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | SX |
Stage IIIA | Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S0 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S1 | |
Stage IIIB | Any pT/TX | N1–N3 | M0 | S2 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S2 | |
Stage IIIC | Any pT/TX | N1–N3 | M0 | S3 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S3 | |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1b | Any S |
Good-prognosis group | |
Non-seminoma 5-year PFS 92% 5-year survival 96% | All of the following criteria:
|
Seminoma with LDH < 2.5 ULN 3-year PFS 92% and 93% in training and validation set 3-year survival 97% and 99% in training and validation set | All of the following criteria:
|
Seminoma with LDH > 2.5 ULN 3-year PFS 80% and 75% in training and validation set 3-year survival 92% and 96% in training and validation set | All of the following criteria
|
Intermediate-prognosis group | |
Non-seminoma 5-year PFS 78% 5-year survival 89% | Any of the following criteria
|
Seminoma 3-year PFS 78% and 61% in training and validation set 3-year survival 93% and 80% in training and validation set | All of the following criteria
|
Poor-prognosis group | |
Non-seminoma 5-year PFS 54% 5-year survival 67% | Any of the following criteria
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pierre, T.; Selhane, F.; Zareski, E.; Garcia, C.; Fizazi, K.; Loriot, Y.; Patrikidou, A.; Naoun, N.; Bernard-Tessier, A.; Baumert, H.; et al. The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls. Cancers 2022, 14, 3965. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163965
Pierre T, Selhane F, Zareski E, Garcia C, Fizazi K, Loriot Y, Patrikidou A, Naoun N, Bernard-Tessier A, Baumert H, et al. The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls. Cancers. 2022; 14(16):3965. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163965
Chicago/Turabian StylePierre, Thibaut, Fatine Selhane, Elise Zareski, Camilo Garcia, Karim Fizazi, Yohann Loriot, Anna Patrikidou, Natacha Naoun, Alice Bernard-Tessier, Hervé Baumert, and et al. 2022. "The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls" Cancers 14, no. 16: 3965. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163965
APA StylePierre, T., Selhane, F., Zareski, E., Garcia, C., Fizazi, K., Loriot, Y., Patrikidou, A., Naoun, N., Bernard-Tessier, A., Baumert, H., Lebacle, C., Blanchard, P., Rocher, L., & Balleyguier, C. (2022). The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls. Cancers, 14(16), 3965. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163965