Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events, Glucocorticoid Use and Immunotherapy Interruption on Long-Term Survival Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cyst and Its Recent Treatment Options: A Comparative Review of 74 Cases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/cancers13102363
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copy Number Profiles of Prostate Cancer in Men of Middle Eastern Ancestry

by
Alia Albawardi
1,2,†,
Julie Livingstone
3,4,5,†,
Saeeda Almarzooqi
1,2,
Nallasivam Palanisamy
6,
Kathleen E. Houlahan
3,4,5,7,
Aktham Adnan Ahmad Awwad
1,
Ramy A. Abdelsalam
8,9,
Paul C. Boutros
3,4,5,10,11 and
Tarek A. Bismar
8,12,13,14,*
1
Tawam Hospital, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 15258, United Arab Emirates
2
Pathology College of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
3
Departments of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 94607, USA
4
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 94607, USA
5
Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 94607, USA
6
Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System Detroit, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
7
Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
8
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary-Cumming School of Medicine and Alberta Precision Labs, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
9
Department of Pathology, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
10
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
11
Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 94607, USA
12
Departments of Oncology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary-Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
13
Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
14
Alberta Precision Labs, Rockyview Hospital Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, 7007-14th Street SW, Calgary, AB T2V 1P9, Canada
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2021, 13(10), 2363; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102363
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 14 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenomics in Prostate Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin malignancy in men. Numerous studies have been undertaken to explore the role that genomics plays in prostate cancer initiation and progression. Most of this genomic data comes tumors arising in men with European or Asian ancestry, leaving other ancestry groups understudied. To fill this gap, we investigated the differences in copy number aberrations between prostate cancers arising in men of Middle Eastern ethnicity and those of European, African, or East Asian ethnicities in the hope of better understanding the incidence and risk of prostate cancer in different populations. We identified ancestry-specific gains and deletions, as well as differences in overall genomic instability between ancestry groups. This confirms that ancestry should be considered when investigating and characterizing biomarkers and molecular signatures relative to disease progression, prognosis, and potentially therapeutic targeting.

Abstract

Our knowledge of prostate cancer (PCa) genomics mainly reflects European (EUR) and Asian (ASN) populations. Our understanding of the influence of Middle Eastern (ME) and African (AFR) ancestry on the mutational profiles of prostate cancer is limited. To characterize genomic differences between ME, EUR, ASN, and AFR ancestry, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) studies for NKX3-1 deletion and MYC amplification were carried out on 42 tumors arising in individuals of ME ancestry. These were supplemented by analysis of genome-wide copy number profiles of 401 tumors of all ancestries. FISH results of NKX3-1 and MYC were assessed in the ME cohort and compared to other ancestries. Gene level copy number aberrations (CNAs) for each sample were statistically compared between ancestry groups. NKX3-1 deletions by FISH were observed in 17/42 (17.5%) prostate tumors arising in men of ME ancestry, while MYC amplifications were only observed in 1/42 (2.3%). Using CNAs called from arrays, the incidence of NKX3-1 deletions was significantly lower in ME vs. other ancestries (20% vs. 52%; p = 2.3 × 10−3). Across the genome, tumors arising in men of ME ancestry had fewer CNAs than those in men of other ancestries (p = 0.014). Additionally, the somatic amplification of 21 specific genes was more frequent in tumors arising in men of ME vs. EUR ancestry (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05). Those included amplifications in the glutathione S-transferase family on chromosome 1 (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM5) and the IQ motif-containing family on chromosome 3 (IQCF1, IQCF2, IQCF13, IQCF4, IQCF5, IQCF6). Larger studies investigating ME populations are warranted to confirm these observations.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin malignancy in men. Risk factors include age [1], family history [2], diet, obesity, and ancestry [3]. Genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic polymorphisms on chromosome 8p and elsewhere to be a significant influence on PCa initiation and progression in populations of European ancestry [4]. Similarly, specific germline polymorphisms have been associated with prostate cancer risk in men of various ancestries [5,6].
In a similar way, several somatic genomic alterations differ in frequency between ancestries, including TMPRSS2-ERG genomic rearrangements, SPINK1 overexpression, and SPOP single nucleotide variants (SNVs), supporting differences in prostate cancer risk and pathway progression [7,8]. The rate of PTEN loss, as assessed by IHC, is lower in men of ME ethnicity, and tumors with PTEN loss are not enriched for ERG loss, as documented in EUR cohorts [9].
Copy number aberrations (CNAs) are the main mutational drivers of prostate cancer, occurring early in evolution [10], being highly prognostic [11], driving subtype [12], and shaping the tumor transcriptome and proteome [13]. The large majority of prostate cancer genomic data are from men with European or Asian ancestry [14], leaving other ancestry groups understudied. To begin to fill this gap, we assembled a cohort of publicly available CNA data from 376 patients of diverse ancestries, and new data from 25 men of Middle Eastern (ME) ancestry. The ME cohort also included 42 samples assessed by FISH for NKX3-1 deletion and MYC amplification.

2. Methods

2.1. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Patient Cohort

A retrospective cohort of 41 radical prostatectomies and one transurethral resection of the prostate from Tawam Hospital (Al Ain, United Arab Emirates), reflecting Middle Eastern men, was investigated by FISH for NKX3-1 deletion and MYC amplification. All selected cases had histopathologic diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma. The original histopathologic classification was confirmed by one of the study pathologists (AA, SA, or TAB). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used for interphase FISH. Deparaffinized tissue was treated with 0.2 mol/L HCl for 10 min, 2 × SSC for 10 min at 80 °C and digested with Proteinase K (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 8 min. The tissues and BAC probes were co-denatured for 5 min at 94 °C and hybridized overnight at 37 °C. Post-hybridization washing was with 2 × SSC with 0.1% Tween 20 for 5 min, and fluorescent detection was done using anti-digoxigenin conjugated to fluorescein (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and streptavidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen). Slides were counterstained and mounted in ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Invitrogen). Slides were examined using a Leica DMRA fluorescence microscope (Leica, Deerfield, IL, USA) and imaged with a CCD camera using the CytoVision software system (Applied Imaging, Santa Clara, CA, USA). FISH signals were scored manually (X100 oil immersion) in morphologically intact and non-overlapping nuclei by pathologists, and a minimum of 100 cancer cells from each site were recorded. Cancer sites with very weak or no signals were recorded as insufficiently hybridized. All BACs were obtained from the BACPAC Genomics (Emeryville, CA, USA), and probe locations were verified by hybridization to metaphase spreads of normal peripheral lymphocytes. For detection of gene deletion or amplification, the following probes were used: for NKX3-1, RP11-325C22 (green), and for MYC, RP11-1136L8 (red). BAC DNA was isolated using a QIAFilter Maxi Prep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and probes were synthesized using digoxigenin- or biotin-nick translation mixes (Roche Applied Science).

2.2. OncoScan SNP Array Patient Cohort

We assessed 25/42 of the FISH cohort cases that had sufficient tissue with OncoScan SNP microarrays (21 cases had both SNP and FISH data available), since some cores were not available for interpretation by FISH on the TMA, due to technical issues. Representative slide(s) from each case corresponding to the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block(s), were identified to obtain tissue cores for OncoScan SNP microarray profiling. For molecular analysis, approximately 8–10 punches of 1.5 mm were collected in Eppendorf tubes from regions with highest percentage of invasive carcinoma, non-tumoral, and involved regional lymph nodes if any.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Al Ain Medical District Human Research Ethics Committee # 15/118 (2015–4246). This study was supported by a grant from Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Award for Medical Sciences (MRG/35/2017). Patient selection, tissue collection, and sample processing for the 376 remaining non-ME samples were performed as described in a previous publication [12].

2.3. SNP Microarray Data Generation and CNA Calling

SNP microarrays were performed with 200 ng of DNA on Affymetrix OncoScan FFPE Express 3.0 arrays as previously described [12]. The genotypes of 217,439 SNPs were extracted from the OncoScan OSCHP files and converted to VCF format. Gene level CNAs for each patient were identified by overlapping copy number segments, with RefGene (2014-07-15) annotation, using BEDTools (v2.17.0) [15]. Percent genome altered (PGA) was calculated for each sample by dividing the number of base pairs that were involved in all copy number segments by the total length of the genome.

2.4. Inferring Ancestry

The HGDP-CEPH dataset (n = 1042) was downloaded [16], subsetted to SNPs that overlap with the OncoScan SNP array (n = 63,320), and converted to VCF format. HGDP-CEPH VCFs were merged with the OncoScan cohort using VCFtools [17]. SNPs in linkage equilibrium with each other were pruned using the -indep command in PLINK [18]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was implemented using PLINK 1.9 (--pca) in the entire dataset as well as within the European population and Middle Eastern population separately.
The ADMIXTURE v 1.3.0 algorithm [19] was used to infer the ancestry of individuals based on the ancestry proportion given k ancestral populations with the PLINK BED file as input. Unsupervised ADMIXTURE analysis was run with k-fold cross validation with iterations of k from 2 to 8. This assignment was used to compare CNA profiles between ancestry populations.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The specific statistical tests used are indicated in the figure legends or appropriate methods section and were performed within the R statistical environment (v3.3.1). Visualization in R was performed with the BPG package (v5.9.2) [20].

3. Results

To assess the CNA changes in prostate tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry, we first focused on two known prostate-cancer-associated genes, NKX3-1 and MYC. Using FISH, we determined that 16% (7/42) of prostate tumors arising in men of Middle Eastern ancestry harbored an NKX3-1 deletion. Similarly, an assessment by FISH detected that ~2.5% (1/42) of tumors arising in men of ME ancestry had a MYC amplification. Figure S1 shows an example tumor with a NKX3-1 deletion detected by FISH.
Next, to compare these intriguing results with different ancestral populations, we assembled a dataset of 401 patients with sporadic, localized, treatment-naive disease. Each patient in this cohort had whole genome copy-number profiling of the index lesion of their tumor. This cohort included 25 newly generated tumors from men of Middle Eastern ancestry (Table 1; Table S1). Patients underwent either image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) or surgery (radical prostatectomy), and the histologically most representative region was molecularly profiled. There was no difference in cellularity (two-way ANOVA; p = 0.15; Figure S2), as measured by ASCAT [21]. We observed a similar percentage of CNAs by SNP microarrays, where 20% (5/25) of tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry had a deletion of NKX3-1. By comparison, 54% (186/346) of tumors arising in men of European ancestry harbored a deletion of NKX3-1 (p = 2.3 × 10−3). The rate of MYC amplification detection by SNP microarray was higher at 16% (4/25), and comparable to the 18% (65/346) in men of European ancestry (p = 0.94).

3.1. Genetic Ancestry Inference

To infer the genetic ancestry of the assembled dataset, we integrated our data with the Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP-CEPH), which contains samples from 51 different global populations [16]. To determine the ancestry fraction for each individual, we used the software ADMIXTURE [19] (Figure 1A; Figure S3). HGDP-CEPH samples previously assigned an ancestry group were not re-assigned, independent of the admixture results. Four primary admixture populations were apparent (Africa-Red; America-Yellow, East Asia-Green, and Oceania-Aquamarine). The other populations were a combination of these primary populations, including samples from men with Middle Eastern ancestry, who showed a combination of African, Central South Asian, and European genotypic features.
Three Middle Eastern samples in our dataset contained a larger than average proportion of the African primary admixture component (Figure S4). We performed principal component analysis (PCA) using 63,320 SNPs to investigate genetic diversity (Figure 1B). PC1 and PC2 explained 30% and 27% of genetic variance, respectively, with PC1 distinguishing East from West populations, while PC2 divided African/Middle Eastern populations from non-African populations. PCA of specific geographical regions showed sub-structures within the larger populations, including within specific regions of Europe and the Middle East (Figure 1C,D). As previously reported [22,23], Middle Eastern and European populations have divergent genetic ancestry.

3.2. Ancestry-Associated CNA Mutation Density

To explore differences in somatic CNA profiles between different ancestry groups, we compared the copy number profiles of tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry (n = 25), African ancestry (n = 14), East Asian ancestry (n =11), and European ancestry (n = 346; Figure 2A; Table S2). Tumors identified as arising in men of Native American ancestry (n = 5) were removed due to the small sample size. All ancestry groups showed large inter-tumoral heterogeneity, where tumors from men with European ancestry had between 0–284 CNAs, tumors from men with African ancestry had 19–217 CNAs, tumors from men with East Asian ancestry had 4–209 CNAs, and tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry had 1–166 CNAs.
The median tumor arising in men of European ancestry contained 18 amplifications and 29 deletions. Tumors arising in men of East Asian ancestry had a similar number of CNAs (20 amplifications + 33 deletions; p = 0.16; Man-Whitney test). By contrast, tumors arising in men of Middle Eastern ancestry had fewer CNAs (7 amplifications + 11 deletions; p = 0.014; Mann-Whitney test), and those arising in men of African ancestry had the most CNAs (45 amplifications + 27 deletions; p = 0.016; Mann-Whitney test). As expected, the smaller number of CNAs in tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry led to lower global genomic instability, measured as the percentage of genome altered (PGA; Figure 2B). Tumors in men with Middle Eastern ancestry had lower PGA (median = 1.93%) than those arising in men of European ancestry (median = 6.45%; p = 1.07 × 10−2; Mann-Whitney test). There was no difference in PGA between tumors from men with African ancestry despite the larger number of aberrations (median = 9.72%) or tumors from men with East Asian ancestry (median = 6.83%).

3.3. Ancestry-Associated CNAs

We assigned each tumor to a prostate cancer subtype based on their gene level CNA profile (Figure 2A,C) [11]. These subtypes (S1–S4) were defined by specific genomic aberrations (S1-chromosome 7 amplification; S2-8p deletion, 8q amplification; S3-8p deletion, 16p deletion; S4-quiet profile). All genetic ancestry groups had a large proportion of tumors in S4, indicative of quiet CNA profiles (Figure 2A). Despite the differences in global genomic instability, the proportion of tumor subtypes did not differ between the different genetic ancestry groups, at least at the statistical power afforded by the existing cohorts (Pearson’s Χ2 test; p = 0.16; Figure 2C).
Understanding the interplay between genetic ancestry and CNAs is important for ancestry-specific biomarker identification. To this end, we compared recurrent gene level CNAs in tumors of men with Middle Eastern, African, and East Asian ancestry with those of men with European ancestry (Table S2). We overlapped CNA segments with gene annotation and compared the proportion of amplifications and deletions separately. Overall, when investigated globally, there were no differences in the proportion of amplifications and deletions in known prostate cancer driver genes across ancestry populations at this statistical power (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05; Figure S5; Table S3).
Globally, 21 genes had more frequent amplifications in tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry compared to tumors from men with European ancestry (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05; Figure 2D). All of these amplifications occurred at a higher rate in tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry. These included amplifications in the glutathione S-transferase family of genes on chromosome 1 (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM5) and the IQ motif-containing family of genes on chromosome 3 (IQCF1, IQCF2, IQCF13, IQCF4, IQCF5, IQCF6). Interestingly, PARP3, an enzyme which is required for DNA repair and maintenance of genomic instability, was amplified in a higher proportion of tumors from men with Middle Eastern ancestry. We did not observe any differences in the proportion of deletions between these two populations (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05).
There were 34 genes in which the proportion of tumors with an amplification, and 40 genes in which the proportion of deletions, differed between tumors from men with African ancestry compared with tumors from men with European ancestry (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05; Figure 2D). These include amplifications in the keratin-associated protein 10 family of genes on chromosome 21 (KRTAP10-1-KRTAP10-11). Intriguingly, there was a higher proportion of BRCA2 amplifications in tumors from men with African ancestry (21%; 3/14) than in tumors from men with European ancestry (1.1%; 4/346). This may account for the larger number of CNAs in this cohort of samples.
There were 148 genes in which the proportion of tumors with an amplification differed between men with East Asian ancestry compared with tumors from men with European ancestry (two-sided proportion test; Q < 0.05; Figure 2D). This includes a region on chromosome 7 spanning 26 genes that was amplified in 88% (9/11) of tumors of East Asian ancestry in our cohort. These data provide us with evidence that genes are mutated at different frequencies in individuals of different ancestry, providing further strong support to the idea that germline variation is essential for understanding the emergence of somatic phenotypes [24].

4. Discussion

Increasing evidence now shows that germline genetic variation strongly shapes the somatic profiles and evolutionary history of prostate cancer. Both rare deleterious variants in DNA damage response (DDR) genes and common polymorphisms have been shown to do so in Caucasian populations [2,24]. Recent sequencing studies have shown that tumors arising in men of Asian, African, or African-American ancestry show distinct somatic mutational features [25,26,27,28]. This study expands on these observations by examining a multi-ancestric cohort and provides the first analysis of CNAs in men of Middle Eastern descent.
Acknowledging the small number of samples in our Middle Eastern cohort, we were able to observe some key findings. Tumors in men of Middle Eastern ancestry showed less genomic instability than those of other ancestry groups, and harbored a larger proportion of amplifications in the glutathione S-transferase family of genes on chromosome 1 (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM5), the IQ motif-containing family of genes on chromosome 3 (IQCF1, IQCF2, IQCF13, IQCF4, IQCF5, IQCF6) and PARP3, an enzyme which is required for DNA repair not commonly mutated in tumors arising in men of other ancestries. GSTM1 amplifications have been reported to be marginally associated with prostate cancer risk in a Caribbean population of African descent [29], warranting further investigation into the function of this gene in non-European cohorts. Interestingly, all three samples from men of Middle Eastern ancestry that had a high proportion of African admixture components had an amplification in GSTM1. Since our cohort lacked matching normal tissue, we were unable to determine if any of these mutations were germline CNAs. It is possible that our genomic analysis included germline CNAs, which would also be of significant interest.
Using FISH, we identified a significant difference in NKX3-1 deletions and MYC amplifications between tumors in men with European ancestry and men with Middle Eastern ancestry. These results are of significance given that NKX3-1 is a gene known to be related to prostate epithelium development and its loss has been implicated in prostate cancer progression, and because MYC has been shown to have a role in aggressive prostate cancer. This data provides further evidence that the genomic backgrounds of tumors can differ between ethnicities and affect the evolutionary path of the tumor.
In previous work, we investigated the significance and incidence of key genetic alterations related to ERG, PTEN, and SPINK1 in a different Middle Eastern cohort relative to a different European cohort [9]. The study documented that ERG, PTEN, and SPINK1 genomic alterations occurred less frequently in the Middle Eastern cohort and that an enrichment of ERG and PTEN loss was not observed. Additionally, tumors in patients with Middle Eastern ancestry that had both a PTEN loss and ERG fusion had a higher risk of biochemical relapse when compared to the European population, where PTEN loss alone was associated with worse clinical outcome. These data confirm that the genomics of prostate cancer differs between men with Middle Eastern ancestry and those from East Asian, African, and European populations, which is likely reflective of factors leading to the higher incidence, rate of disease progression, and cause-specific mortality observed in other ancestries compared with men with Middle Eastern ancestry [30,31].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, tumors arising in men of ME ancestry had fewer CNAs and lower PGA than those in men of other ancestries. There was no difference in the proportion of global CNA subtypes between the different ancestry groups, although there were differences in the proportions of CNAs in specific genes. Therefore, ancestry should be considered when investigating and characterizing biomarkers and molecular signatures relative to disease progression, prognosis, and potentially therapeutic targeting. Despite our limited sample size, our results document significant differences in key genes associated with prostate cancer progression and aggressiveness. The data also suggest that germline–somatic interactions may be at play in tumors arising in men of different ancestries. Further multi-omic studies of tumors arising in men of different ancestry are clearly warranted.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers13102363/s1, Figure S1: Example image of NKX3-1 deletion identified through FISH, Figure S2: Tumor cellularity does not differ across ancestry groups, Figure S3: ADMIXTURE cluster plots varying inferred ancestries from 2 to 8, Figure S4: ADMIXTURE cluster plots for men with Middle Eastern ancestry, Figure S5: CNA profile of prostate-cancer-associated genes, Table S1: Patient clinical information, Table S2: Patient by CNA matrix, Table S3: CNA analysis statistics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A.B. and P.C.B.; Methodology, J.L., K.E.H., N.P., A.A.A.A.; Formal Analysis, J.L., N.P.; Resources, A.A., S.A., R.A.A.; Data Curation, J.L.; Writing–Original Draft Preparation, J.L., P.C.B., T.A.B.; Writing–Review & Editing, J.L., P.C.B., T.A.B.; Visualization, J.L.; Supervision, P.C.B., T.A.B.; Project Administration, T.A.B.; Funding Acquisition, A.A., S.A., T.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted with the support to P.C.B. by the NIH/NCI under award number P30CA016042, by an operating grant from the National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network (1U01CA214194-01), and by a Prostate Cancer Foundation Special Challenge Award to PCB (Award ID #: 20CHAS01) made possible by the generosity of Mr. Larry Ruvo. This work was supported by Alberta Precision Labs (RS19-600), Prostate Cancer Canada, and Prostate Cancer Foundation USA. The Sheikh Hamdan Medical Award was supported partially or completely by grant # MRG/35/2017 (A.A., S.A., T.A.B.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of approved by the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine ethics review board (protocol code HREBA CC-16-15501 REN6 )7/14/2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived as the study is retrospective in nature.

Data Availability Statement

The publicly available OncoScan SNP array data can be found on EGA under the accession EGAS00001002367. The Middle Eastern OncoScan SNP array data are being made available as well on EGA.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all members of the Boutros lab for insightful commentary and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

P.C.B. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of BioSymetrics Inc. and Intersect Diagnostics Inc. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weischenfeldt, J.; Simon, R.; Feuerbach, L.; Schlangen, K.; Weichenhan, D.; Minner, S.; Wuttig, D.; Warnatz, H.-J.; Stehr, H.; Rausch, T.; et al. Integrative Genomic Analyses Reveal an Androgen-Driven Somatic Alteration Landscape in Early-Onset Prostate Cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 23, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Taylor, R.A.; Fraser, M.; Livingstone, J.; Espiritu, S.M.G.; Thorne, H.; Huang, V.; Lo, W.; Shiah, Y.-J.; Yamaguchi, T.N.; Sliwinski, A.; et al. Germline BRCA2 Mutations Drive Prostate Cancers with Distinct Evolutionary Trajectories. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/index.html (accessed on 24 October 2019).
  4. Washburn, J.G.; Wojno, K.J.; Dey, J.; Powell, I.J.; Macoska, J.A. 8pter-P23 Deletion Is Associated with Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 4647–4652. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Shan, J.; Al-Rumaihi, K.; Rabah, D.; Al-Bozom, I.; Kizhakayil, D.; Farhat, K.; Al-Said, S.; Kfoury, H.; Dsouza, S.P.; Rowe, J.; et al. Genome Scan Study of Prostate Cancer in Arabs: Identification of Three Genomic Regions with Multiple Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Loci in Tunisians. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Al Olama, A.A.; Kote-Jarai, Z.; Berndt, S.I.; Conti, D.V.; Schumacher, F.; Han, Y.; Benlloch, S.; Hazelett, D.J.; Wang, Z.; Saunders, E.; et al. A Meta-Analysis of 87,040 Individuals Identifies 23 New Susceptibility Loci for Prostate Cancer. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kong, D.-P.; Chen, R.; Zhang, C.-L.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, G.-A.; Wang, F.-B.; Ta, N.; Gao, X.; Sun, Y.-H. Prevalence and Clinical Application of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion in Asian Prostate Cancer Patients: A Large-Sample Study in Chinese People and a Systematic Review. Asian J. Androl. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tonon, L.; Fromont, G.; Boyault, S.; Thomas, E.; Ferrari, A.; Sertier, A.-S.; Kielbassa, J.; Le Texier, V.; Kamoun, A.; Elarouci, N.; et al. Mutational Profile of Aggressive, Localised Prostate Cancer from African Caribbean Men Versus European Ancestry Men. Eur. Urol. 2019, 75, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Abdelsalam, R.A.; Khalifeh, I.; Box, A.; Kalantarian, M.; Ghosh, S.; Abou-Ouf, H.; Lotfi, T.; Shahait, M.; Palanisamy, N.; Bismar, T.A. Molecular Characterization of Prostate Cancer in Middle Eastern Population Highlights Differences with Western Populations with Prognostic Implication. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Espiritu, S.M.G.; Liu, L.Y.; Rubanova, Y.; Bhandari, V.; Holgersen, E.M.; Szyca, L.M.; Fox, N.S.; Chua, M.L.K.; Yamaguchi, T.N.; Heisler, L.E.; et al. The Evolutionary Landscape of Localized Prostate Cancers Drives Clinical Aggression. Cell 2018, 173, 1003–1013.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lalonde, E.; Ishkanian, A.S.; Sykes, J.; Fraser, M.; Ross-Adams, H.; Erho, N.; Dunning, M.J.; Halim, S.; Lamb, A.D.; Moon, N.C.; et al. Tumour Genomic and Microenvironmental Heterogeneity for Integrated Prediction of 5-Year Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fraser, M.; Sabelnykova, V.Y.; Yamaguchi, T.N.; Heisler, L.E.; Livingstone, J.; Huang, V.; Shiah, Y.-J.; Yousif, F.; Lin, X.; Masella, A.P.; et al. Genomic Hallmarks of Localized, Non-Indolent Prostate Cancer. Nature 2017, 541, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sinha, A.; Huang, V.; Livingstone, J.; Wang, J.; Fox, N.S.; Kurganovs, N.; Ignatchenko, V.; Fritsch, K.; Donmez, N.; Heisler, L.E.; et al. The Proteogenomic Landscape of Curable Prostate Cancer. Cancer Cell 2019, 35, 414–427.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rebbeck, T.R. Prostate Cancer Genetics: Variation by Race, Ethnicity, and Geography. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 27, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Quinlan, A.R.; Hall, I.M. BEDTools: A Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 841–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cann, H.M.; de Toma, C.; Cazes, L.; Legrand, M.-F.; Morel, V.; Piouffre, L.; Bodmer, J.; Bodmer, W.F.; Bonne-Tamir, B.; Cambon-Thomsen, A.; et al. A Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel. Science 2002, 296, 261–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The Variant Call Format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chang, C.C.; Chow, C.C.; Tellier, L.C.; Vattikuti, S.; Purcell, S.M.; Lee, J.J. Second-Generation PLINK: Rising to the Challenge of Larger and Richer Datasets. Gigascience 2015, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast Model-Based Estimation of Ancestry in Unrelated Individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. P’ng, C.; Green, J.; Chong, L.C.; Waggott, D.; Prokopec, S.D.; Shamsi, M.; Nguyen, F.; Mak, D.Y.F.; Lam, F.; Albuquerque, M.A.; et al. BPG: Seamless, Automated and Interactive Visualization of Scientific Data. BMC Bioinform. 2019, 20, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Loo, P.; Nilsen, G.; Nordgard, S.H.; Vollan, H.K.M.; Børresen-Dale, A.-L.; Kristensen, V.N.; Lingjærde, O.C. Analyzing Cancer Samples with SNP Arrays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 802, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Phillips, C.; Parson, W.; Lundsberg, B.; Santos, C.; Freire-Aradas, A.; Torres, M.; Eduardoff, M.; Børsting, C.; Johansen, P.; Fondevila, M.; et al. Building a Forensic Ancestry Panel from the Ground up: The EUROFORGEN Global AIM-SNP Set. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 11, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Li, J.Z.; Absher, D.M.; Tang, H.; Southwick, A.M.; Casto, A.M.; Ramachandran, S.; Cann, H.M.; Barsh, G.S.; Feldman, M.; Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.; et al. Worldwide Human Relationships Inferred from Genome-Wide Patterns of Variation. Science 2008, 319, 1100–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Houlahan, K.E.; Shiah, Y.-J.; Gusev, A.; Yuan, J.; Ahmed, M.; Shetty, A.; Ramanand, S.G.; Yao, C.Q.; Bell, C.; O’Connor, E.; et al. Genome-Wide Germline Correlates of the Epigenetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1615–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ren, S.; Wei, G.-H.; Liu, D.; Wang, L.; Hou, Y.; Zhu, S.; Peng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Su, H.; et al. Whole-Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing of Prostate Cancer Identify New Genetic Alterations Driving Disease Progression. Eur. Urol. 2018, 73, 322–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, F.W.; Mosquera, J.M.; Garofalo, A.; Oh, C.; Baco, M.; Amin-Mansour, A.; Rabasha, B.; Bahl, S.; Mullane, S.A.; Robinson, B.D.; et al. Exome Sequencing of African-American Prostate Cancer Reveals Loss-of-Function ERF Mutations. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jaratlerdsiri, W.; Chan, E.K.F.; Gong, T.; Petersen, D.C.; Kalsbeek, A.M.F.; Venter, P.A.; Stricker, P.D.; Bornman, M.S.R.; Hayes, V.M. Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden and Initiating Driver Mutations in African Men with Treatment-Naïve, High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 6736–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Takata, R.; Takahashi, A.; Fujita, M.; Momozawa, Y.; Saunders, E.J.; Yamada, H.; Maejima, K.; Nakano, K.; Nishida, Y.; Hishida, A.; et al. 12 New Susceptibility Loci for Prostate Cancer Identified by Genome-Wide Association Study in Japanese Population. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Emeville, E.; Broquère, C.; Brureau, L.; Ferdinand, S.; Blanchet, P.; Multigner, L.; Romana, M. Copy Number Variation of GSTT1 and GSTM1 and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Caribbean Population of African Descent. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wong, M.C.S.; Goggins, W.B.; Wang, H.H.X.; Fung, F.D.H.; Leung, C.; Wong, S.Y.S.; Ng, C.F.; Sung, J.J.Y. Global Incidence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Temporal Patterns and Trends in 36 Countries. Eur. Urol. 2016, 70, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hussain, A.M.A.; Lafta, R.K. Cancer Trends in Iraq 2000–2016. Oman. Med. J. 2021, 36, e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 13 02363 g001 550
Figure 1. Population analysis with HGDP-CEPH SNP data. (A) ADMIXTURE cluster plot with k = 7. Each sample is represented by a vertical line partitioned into colored segments whose length is proportional to the ancestry coefficient in up to seven inferred populations. The cohort covariate bar represents which dataset the sample came from, where black indicates the current cohort and white indicates HGDP-CEPH. (B) PCA plot with 63,320 SNPs analyzing the same population as in Figure 1A. Samples are colored based on their assigned genetic ancestry, with circles indicating samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset and triangles representing samples in the current cohort. (C) PCA plot including samples with European genetic ancestry. Samples are colored based on their geographic region within Europe, or grey if region is unknown. Circles indicate samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset. Grey triangles represent samples with European ancestry in the current cohort; specific region is unknown. (D) PCA plot including samples with Middle Eastern ancestry. Samples are colored based on their geographic region within the Middle East, or grey if region is unknown. Circles indicate samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset. Grey triangles represent the Middle Eastern samples in the current cohort; the specific region is unknown.
Figure 1. Population analysis with HGDP-CEPH SNP data. (A) ADMIXTURE cluster plot with k = 7. Each sample is represented by a vertical line partitioned into colored segments whose length is proportional to the ancestry coefficient in up to seven inferred populations. The cohort covariate bar represents which dataset the sample came from, where black indicates the current cohort and white indicates HGDP-CEPH. (B) PCA plot with 63,320 SNPs analyzing the same population as in Figure 1A. Samples are colored based on their assigned genetic ancestry, with circles indicating samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset and triangles representing samples in the current cohort. (C) PCA plot including samples with European genetic ancestry. Samples are colored based on their geographic region within Europe, or grey if region is unknown. Circles indicate samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset. Grey triangles represent samples with European ancestry in the current cohort; specific region is unknown. (D) PCA plot including samples with Middle Eastern ancestry. Samples are colored based on their geographic region within the Middle East, or grey if region is unknown. Circles indicate samples from the HGDP-CEPH dataset. Grey triangles represent the Middle Eastern samples in the current cohort; the specific region is unknown.
Cancers 13 02363 g001
Cancers 13 02363 g002a 550Cancers 13 02363 g002b 550
Figure 2. Copy number aberration profiles differ based on ancestry. (A) CNA profiles of tumors in men with Middle Eastern, African, East Asian, and European ancestry. Within the heatmap, red indicates a copy number amplification, while blue indicates a copy number deletion. Each row represents a tumor (ordered by subtype), and each column represents a gene ordered by genomic coordinate. Clinical features per tumor are shown in the covariate bar on the right, including the four previously identified CNA subtypes [11]. IDC; intraductal carcinoma or cribriform architecture. (B) Percent genome altered (PGA) differed across tumors from men with different ancestries. p value is from a Mann-Whitney test. (C) The proportion of tumors assigned to each subtype [11] did not differ between tumors from men with different ancestry. p value is from a Pearson’s chi-squared test. The colors of the stacked bars correspond to the CNA subtypes in Figure 1A. (D) Specific genes differed in their proportion between tumors from men with Middle Eastern, African, East Asian, and European ancestry. Genes are ordered by genomic coordinate per chromosome. Amplifications are represented in red, and deletions are represented in blue. Only significant Q values from proportion tests are shown comparing men with Middle Eastern (dark orange), African (red), or East Asian (green) ancestry to men with European ancestry.
Figure 2. Copy number aberration profiles differ based on ancestry. (A) CNA profiles of tumors in men with Middle Eastern, African, East Asian, and European ancestry. Within the heatmap, red indicates a copy number amplification, while blue indicates a copy number deletion. Each row represents a tumor (ordered by subtype), and each column represents a gene ordered by genomic coordinate. Clinical features per tumor are shown in the covariate bar on the right, including the four previously identified CNA subtypes [11]. IDC; intraductal carcinoma or cribriform architecture. (B) Percent genome altered (PGA) differed across tumors from men with different ancestries. p value is from a Mann-Whitney test. (C) The proportion of tumors assigned to each subtype [11] did not differ between tumors from men with different ancestry. p value is from a Pearson’s chi-squared test. The colors of the stacked bars correspond to the CNA subtypes in Figure 1A. (D) Specific genes differed in their proportion between tumors from men with Middle Eastern, African, East Asian, and European ancestry. Genes are ordered by genomic coordinate per chromosome. Amplifications are represented in red, and deletions are represented in blue. Only significant Q values from proportion tests are shown comparing men with Middle Eastern (dark orange), African (red), or East Asian (green) ancestry to men with European ancestry.
Cancers 13 02363 g002aCancers 13 02363 g002b
Table
Table 1. Summary of clinical features per ethnicity group.
Table 1. Summary of clinical features per ethnicity group.
DatasetEuropeAfricaE. AsiaN. AmericanMid. East
ISUP Grade Group
1601319
220096312
3754213
470001
520000
NA20000
Age at Treatment
40–5071010
50–651604538
65–707421012
≥701057515
Pre-treatment PSA
≤9.9 ng/mL411130
10–19.9 ng/mL933018
≥20 ng/mL249100117
T category
T11657441
T218177113
T3000011
Intraductal carcinoma or cribriform architecture
Yes19630021
No10010944
NA501210
Total3461411525
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albawardi, A.; Livingstone, J.; Almarzooqi, S.; Palanisamy, N.; Houlahan, K.E.; Awwad, A.A.A.; Abdelsalam, R.A.; Boutros, P.C.; Bismar, T.A. Copy Number Profiles of Prostate Cancer in Men of Middle Eastern Ancestry. Cancers 2021, 13, 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102363

AMA Style

Albawardi A, Livingstone J, Almarzooqi S, Palanisamy N, Houlahan KE, Awwad AAA, Abdelsalam RA, Boutros PC, Bismar TA. Copy Number Profiles of Prostate Cancer in Men of Middle Eastern Ancestry. Cancers. 2021; 13(10):2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albawardi, Alia, Julie Livingstone, Saeeda Almarzooqi, Nallasivam Palanisamy, Kathleen E. Houlahan, Aktham Adnan Ahmad Awwad, Ramy A. Abdelsalam, Paul C. Boutros, and Tarek A. Bismar. 2021. "Copy Number Profiles of Prostate Cancer in Men of Middle Eastern Ancestry" Cancers 13, no. 10: 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop