You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Nutrients
  • Review
  • Open Access

1 July 2022

The Efficacy of S-Adenosyl Methionine and Probiotic Supplementation on Depression: A Synergistic Approach

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Nowshera, Nowshera 24110, Pakistan
3
Centre for Transdisciplinary Research, Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai 600077, India
4
CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy
This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Nutrition in Understanding Anxiety and Depression

Abstract

Depression is a common and serious health issue affecting around 280 million people around the world. Suicidal ideation more frequently occurs in people with moderate to severe depression. Psychotherapy and pharmacological drugs are the mainstay of available treatment options for depressive disorders. However, pharmacological options do not offer complete cure, especially in moderate to severe depression, and are often seen with a range of adverse events. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) supplementation has been widely studied, and an impressive collection of literature published over the last few decades suggests its antidepressant efficacy. Probiotics have gained significant attention due to their wide array of clinical uses, and multiple studies have explored the link between probiotic species and mood disorders. Gut dysbiosis is one of the risk factors in depression by inducing systemic inflammation accompanied by an imbalance in neurotransmitter production. Thus, concomitant administration of probiotics may be an effective treatment strategy in patients with depressed mood, particularly in resistant cases, as these can aid in dysbiosis, possibly resulting in the attenuation of systemic inflammatory processes and the improvement of the therapeutic efficacy of SAMe. The current review highlights the therapeutic roles of SAMe and probiotics in depression, their mechanistic targets, and their possible synergistic effects and may help in the development of food supplements consisting of a combination of SAMe and probiotics with new dosage forms that may improve their bioavailability.

1. Introduction

Depression is a common and serious mood disorder worldwide, and subjects with depression often experience persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness and loss of interest in daily life activities. The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), categorizes depression into disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), premenstrual dysphoric disorder, dysthymia (persistent depressive disorder), and depressive disorder due to another medical condition []. According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, approximately 280 million people are living with depression around the globe []. When recurrent, depression may become a moderate to serious health issue. Suicidal ideation is more common in depressed individuals, especially in MDDD or other depressive disorders with moderate to severe intensity, and over 700,000 people die each year due to suicidal attempts [].
Subthreshold depression (SD), also known as subsyndromal or subclinical depression, is defined by the presence of two or more depressive symptoms for 2 weeks, while not meeting the criteria for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and/or dysthymia, although it may possess a significant impact on the quality of an individual’s life []. The prevalence of SD varies highly across scientific studies, as prevalence rates for SD range from 2.9% to 9.9% in primary care and 1.4% to 17.2% in community settings []. SD is a risk factor in the development of MDD, especially in the older population, although literature data suggest that it may not be merely a prodromal phase of MDD, and it may not always lead to MDD [].
Both SD and MDD are associated with increased mortality, possibly due to risky behavior and physical comorbidities []. The aim of treatment is to reduce or prevent the negative outcomes associated with depressive conditions []. Psychotherapy and the use of psychotropic agents for short periods have been recommended as first-line therapeutic options, though pharmacological treatment has been associated with numerous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) []. Available pharmacological classes employed in the treatment of depressive disorders are tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) []. Targeting and treating SD and mild to moderate depression, particularly in the high-risk population, might be a useful strategy in decreasing the prevalence rates of MDD []. A study conducted by Williams et al. (2000) showed the improvement of depressive symptoms and the positive impact of antidepressants in older patients with minor depression and functional impairment []. By contrast, a meta-analysis report including six clinical trials showed no significant advantage of antidepressants in the treatment of SD over placebo [].
About 30% of patients do not respond well to the recommended doses of antidepressant medications, and this is termed as refractory depression. In such cases, increasing the dosage of the existing antidepressant, switching between different pharmacological classes, and/or adding lithium therapy has been suggested, though none of these approaches thoroughly resolves the issue []. Conventional antidepressant therapies can provoke tolerability or acceptability issues in patients [,]. The most notable adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported after treatment with antidepressant drugs include dry mouth, sexual dysfunction, dizziness, hypotension, appetite changes, and insomnia []. Discontinuation syndrome, characterized by flulike symptoms, headache, dizziness, shocklike sensations in the upper extremities, vivid dreams, and impaired concentration are also common with abrupt discontinuation of antidepressants []. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of antidepressant medications among patients with generalized anxiety disorders (GADs) showed higher dropout rates for patients with older antidepressants, such as TCAs excluding imipramine, as compared with newer antidepressants (i.e., venlafaxine and paroxetine), showing poor acceptability of the older antidepressants by patients, which may be correlated with the intolerable side effects of this class of drugs [].
Recent literature has linked poor diet and lack of exercise with the genesis and course of depression. Thus, recommendations regarding dietary improvement in combination with an increase in exercise and cessation of smoking should be routinely given to patients with depression []. Dietary improvement and supplementation could be an acceptable and less expensive strategy to be used alternatively in mild cases or in combination with standard antidepressant therapy in cases of moderate to severe depression []. A systemic review studied the association between diet and depression in children and adolescents, which led to the conclusion that a high intake of healthy foods (fruits, leafy green vegetables, and fish consumption) and a lower intake of unhealthy foods (fast foods, snacking, and confectionery/sweets) are reciprocal to low mood and depressive episodes. Moreover, no significant association of atypical mood was found with cereal/grain, dairy product, and fat consumption []. Individual bioactive components showing an improvement of depression and anxiety symptoms include vitamin D, antioxidant vitamins (A, C, and E), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) [], N-acetylcysteine (NAC) [], S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) [], prebiotics and probiotics [], and essential trace elements (selenium, zinc, magnesium, copper, iron, and chromium) []. This review is designed to focus and highlight the antidepressant potential of SAMe and probiotic strains, their mechanistic targets and synergistic effects, the possible new formulations for SAMe to improve its bioavailability, and the possibility of the development of novel food supplements containing both SAMe and probiotic strains.

4. The Possible Combination of Probiotics and S-Adenosyl Methionine

Adjuvant administration of SAMe with SSRIs in the dose range of 800–1600 mg/day to patients with resistant depression could result in remission from complex resistant depressive states in about 36% of patients; however, the remaining 64% of patients may have a suboptimal response to the augmentation therapy []. Interestingly, resistant depression is usually accompanied by systemic inflammation induced by gut dysbiosis, and the imbalance in neurotransmitter production may be a direct result of this gut dysbiosis [,]. Gut microbiota also play a role in the first-pass metabolism of natural products, including SAMe, through the alteration of host pathways for metabolism and transport. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome may directly affect the therapeutic efficacy of these products [,]. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been evaluated for their SAMe-producing ability, and researchers found that B. bifidum BGN4 produced a significantly higher amount of SAMe when compared with other strains of Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus [].
Thus, concomitant administration of probiotics could be an effective treatment strategy in patients with depressed mood, particularly in resistant cases, as it can ameliorate dysbiosis, which may possibly result in the attenuation of systemic inflammatory processes and the improvement of the therapeutic efficacy of supplements such as SAMe. On the other hand, SAMe reduces inflammatory mediators through a reduction in proinflammatory bacteria in the gut, increasing glutathione levels and positively regulating growth factor signaling, which may also improve the therapeutic response of pharmacological agents and natural supplements in these patients []. A clinical trial, with reference number NCT03932474, demonstrated a fast and clinically significant improvement of mild to moderate symptoms with the supplementation of SAMe and L. plantarum HEAL9 in adult patients with SD []. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, 90 subjects aged 18–60 years with mild to moderate depression, according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria, were randomized to receive a combination of SAMe (200 mg) and L. plantarum HEAL9 (1 × 109 CFU) (n = 46) or placebo (n = 44) for 6 weeks. The results showed a considerable improvement of symptoms of depression, anxiety, cognitive and somatic components after 2 weeks of treatment in patients supplemented with the combination of SAMe and L. plantarum HEAL9.

5. Concluding Remarks

SAMe possesses significant mood-enhancing potential owing to its multiple mechanistic targets, particularly transmethylation pathways and monoamine neurotransmitters. Its antidepressant efficacy has been evidenced in numerous clinical studies, whether used alone to combat mild to moderate depressive symptoms or in combination with traditional antidepressant medications in moderate to severe instances of the disease. Furthermore, oral dosage of SAMe is readily safe up to 1600 mg, with no serious adverse concerns. Unlike other antidepressant drugs, SAMe is not associated with sexual and cognitive/memory dysfunction. However, caution should be exercised with the use of SAMe in bipolar patients due to the risk of hypomanic or manic symptoms. In the light of available literature data, it is best to use SAMe in patients with mild to moderate depression, rather than relying on conventional antidepressant medicines, which may carry an increased risk of toxicity in such patients.
Despite having antidepressant efficacy, suboptimal responses have been observed with SAMe in the majority of cases, especially with resistant depression, where systemic inflammation and imbalances in neurotransmitter production induced by gut dysbiosis are central parts of the pathophysiological mechanism. Probiotic species are designated as health-promoting agents and are essential in counterbalancing gut dysbiosis, which may be associated with several intestinal and extraintestinal disorders. In depression, probiotic supplementation may counter inflammatory and immune-mediated signaling and HPA axis overactivation, with upregulated BDNF expression and increased production of neurotransmitters (GABA, serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine). Certain probiotic species have been proven in clinical studies to have considerable antidepressant efficacy. The concomitant supplementation of SAMe and probiotics could be an effective strategy in the remission of depressive symptoms, as this combination would address gut dysbiosis with attenuation of systemic inflammatory responses and improvement in the healing efficacy of SAMe. Formulation of SAMe using new techniques, such as oral disintegrated tablets, could increase its bioavailability, which may decrease the daily dose requirement of SAMe, reducing the possibility of side effects associated with higher dosages, such as GI upsets.
As far as future perspectives are concerned, several studies have shown that SAMe undergoes extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism after oral intake, reducing its therapeutic efficacy. Several formulations of SAMe with stable salts in the form of enteric coated tablets have been designed to counter the issues of low bioavailability. It has been suggested that SAMe and probiotic strains be formulated together using novel formulation techniques, with the aim of increased bioavailability of SAMe and their synergistic antidepressant effects. As much as available studies are concerned regarding SAMe and probiotics supplementation in mild to moderate depression, most of the studies are carried out in patients with MDD and based on which the clinical efficacy of SAMe and probiotic strains cannot be reflected in mild to moderate depression. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm the clinical effectiveness of both supplements individually in subclinical and mild to moderate depression. Moreover, clinical studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of SAMe and probiotic strains together in novel formulations in subjects with mild to moderate depression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D. and H.U.; writing—original draft, H.U., A.K., and K.R.R.R.; writing—review and editing, H.U., A.K., A.D.M., and R.S.; supervision, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO Depression. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  3. Juruena, M.F. Understanding subthreshold depression. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 2012, 24, 292. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Rodríguez, M.R.; Nuevo, R.; Chatterji, S.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.L. Definitions and factors associated with subthreshold depressive conditions: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rowe, S.K.; Rapaport, M.H. Classification and treatment of sub-threshold depression. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2006, 19, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ho, C.S.; Jin, A.; Nyunt, M.S.Z.; Feng, L.; Ng, T.P. Mortality rates in major and subthreshold depression: 10-year follow-up of a Singaporean population cohort of older adults. Postgrad. Med. 2016, 128, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Biella, M.M.; Borges, M.K.; Strauss, J.; Mauer, S.; Martinelli, J.E.; Aprahamian, I. Subthreshold depression needs a prime time in old age psychiatry? A narrative review of current evidence. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019, 15, 2763–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Spijker, J.; Nolen, W.A. An algorithm for the pharmacological treatment of depression: Clinical overview. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2010, 121, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jeuring, H.W.; Huisman, M.; Comijs, H.C.; Stek, M.L.; Beekman, A.T.F. The long-term outcome of subthreshold depression in later life. Psychol. Med. 2016, 46, 2855–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Williams, J.W.; Barrett, J.; Oxman, T.; Frank, E.; Katon, W.; Sullivan, M.; Cornell, J.; Sengupta, A. Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: A randomized controlled trial in older adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000, 284, 1519–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Barbui, C.; Cipriani, A.; Patel, V.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.L.; van Ommeren, M. Efficacy of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in minor depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 2011, 198, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stimpson, N.; Agrawal, N.; Lewis, G. Randomised controlled trials investigating pharmacological and psychological interventions for treatment-refractory depression. Br. J. Psychiatry 2002, 181, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rayner, L.; Price, A.; Evans, A.; Valsraj, K.; Higginson, I.J.; Hotopf, M. Antidepressants for depression in physically Ill People. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 17, CD007503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kapczinski, F.F.; Lima, M.S.; Souza, J.S.; Schmitt, R. Antidepressant for generalized anxiety disorder (Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 3, CD003592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gabriel, M.; Sharma, V. Antidepressant discontinuation syndrome. CMAJ 2017, 189, E747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Jacka, F.N.; Berk, M. Depression, diet and exercise. Med. J. Aust. 2013, 199, S21–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bamber, D.J.; Stokes, C.S.; Stephen, A.M. The role of diet in the prevention and management of adolescent depression. Nutr. Bull. 2007, 32, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khalid, S.; Williams, C.M.; Reynolds, S.A. Is there an association between diet and depression in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 116, 2097–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hoffmann, K.; Emons, B.; Brunnhuber, S.; Karaca, S.; Juckel, G. The role of dietary supplements in depression and anxiety-a narrative review. Pharmacopsychiatry 2019, 52, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Andrade, C. N-acetylcysteine augmentation for patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar depression. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2021, 82, 25943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Papakostas, G.I.; Cassiello, C.F.; Iovieno, N. Folates and S-adenosylmethionine for major depressive disorder. Can. J. Psychiatry 2012, 57, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, R.T.; Walsh, R.F.L.; Sheehan, A.E. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 102, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shayganfard, M. Are essential trace elements effective in modulation of mental disorders? Update and perspectives. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 1032–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cantoni, G.L. The nature of the active methyl donor formed enzymatically from L-methionine and adenosinetriphosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2942–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shaw, S. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe). In Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements; Nabavi, S.M., Silva, A.S., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  26. Grillo, M.A.; Colombatto, S. S-adenosylmethionine and its products. Amino Acids 2008, 34, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chu, J.; Qian, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y. Progress in the research of S-adenosyl-l-methionine production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sharma, A.; Gerbarg, P.; Bottiglieri, T.; Massoumi, L.; Carpenter, L.L.; Lavretsky, H.; Muskin, P.R.; Brown, R.P.; Mischoulon, D. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) for neuropsychiatric disorders: A clinician-oriented review of research. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Obeid, R.; Herrmann, W. Homocysteine and lipids: S-adenosyl methionine as a key intermediate. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mischoulon, D.; Fava, M. Role of S-adenosyl-l-methionine in the treatment of depression: A review of the evidence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 1158S–1161S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Papakostas, G.I.; Alpert, J.E.; Fava, M. S-adenosyl-methionine in depression: A comprehensive review of the literature. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2003, 5, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sarris, J.; Murphy, J.; Stough, C.; Mischoulon, D.; Bousman, C.; MacDonald, P.; Adams, L.; Nazareth, S.; Oliver, G.; Cribb, L.; et al. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy for depression: An 8-week double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Psychopharmacology 2020, 237, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Di Pierro, F.; Orsi, R.; Settembre, R. Role of betaine in improving the antidepressant effect of S-adenosyl-methionine in patients with mild-to-moderate depression. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2015, 8, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Levkovitz, Y.; Alpert, J.E.; Brintz, C.E.; Mischoulon, D.; Papakostas, G.I. Effects of S-adenosylmethionine augmentation of serotonin-reuptake inhibitor antidepressants on cognitive symptoms of major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 136, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mischoulon, D.; Price, L.H.; Carpenter, L.L.; Tyrka, A.R.; Papakostas, G.I.; Baer, L.; Dording, C.M.; Clain, A.J.; Durham, K.; Walker, R.; et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) versus escitalopram in major depressive disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sarris, J.; Papakostas, G.I.; Vitolo, O.; Fava, M.; Mischoulon, D. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) versus escitalopram and placebo in major depression RCT: Efficacy and effects of histamine and carnitine as moderators of response. J. Affect. Disord. 2014, 64, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Di Rocco, A.; Rogers, J.D.; Brown, R.; Werner, P.; Bottiglieri, T. S-adenosyl-methionine improves Depression in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease in an Open-Label Clinical Trial. Mov. Disord. 2000, 15, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Healy, D. Antidepressants and sexual dysfunction: A history. J. R. Soc. Med. 2020, 113, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dording, C.M.; Mischoulon, D.; Shyu, I.; Alpert, J.E.; Papakostas, G.I. SAMe and sexual functioning. Eur. Psychiatry 2012, 27, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cuomo, A.; Crescenzi, B.B.; Bolognesi, S.; Goracci, A.; Koukouna, D.; Rossi, R.; Fagiolini, A. Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) in major depressive disorder (mdd): A clinician-oriented systematic review. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2020, 19, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Galizia, I.; Oldani, L.; Macritchie, K.; Amari, E.; Dougall, D.; Jones, T.N.; Lam, R.W.; Massei, G.J.; Yatham, L.N.; Young, A.H. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 10, CD011286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Papakostas, G.I.; Mischoulon, D.; Shyu, I.; Alpert, J.E.; Fava, M. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for antidepressant nonresponders with major depressive disorder: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, J.; Cahill, C.M.; Huang, X.; Roffman, J.L.; Lamon-Fava, S.; Fava, M.; Mischoulon, D.; Rogers, J.T. S-adenosyl methionine and transmethylation pathways in neuropsychiatric diseases throughout life. Neurotherapeutics 2018, 15, 156–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Karas Kuželički, N. S-adenosyl methionine in the therapy of depression and other psychiatric disorders. Drug Dev. Res. 2016, 77, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, D.; Meng, L.; Pei, F.; Zheng, Y.; Leng, J. A review of DNA methylation in depression. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 43, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Trivedi, M.S.; Deth, R.C. Role of a redox-based methylation switch in Mrna life cycle (Pre and post-transcriptional maturation) and protein turnover: Implications in neurological disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Boks, M.P.; de Jong, N.M.; Kas, M.J.H.; Vinkers, C.H.; Fernandes, C.; Kahn, R.S.; Mill, J.; Ophoff, R.A. Current status and future prospects for epigenetic psychopharmacology. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Pfalzer, A.C.; Choi, S.W.; Tammen, S.A.; Park, L.K.; Bottiglieri, T.; Parnell, L.D.; Lamon-Fava, S. S-adenosylmethionine mediates inhibition of inflammatory response and changes in DNA methylation in human macrophages. Physiol. Genom. 2014, 46, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gobejishvili, L.; Avila, D.V.; Barker, D.F.; Ghare, S.; Henderson, D.; Brock, G.N.; Kirpich, I.A.; Joshi-Barve, S.; Mokshagundam, S.P.L.; McClain, C.J. S-adenosylmethionine decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced phosphodiesterase 4B2 and attenuates tumor necrosis factor expression via CAMP/Protein kinase A pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Peedicayil, J. Role of epigenetics in pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and nutritional management of mental disorders. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2012, 37, 499–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brummelte, S.; Mc Glanaghy, E.; Bonnin, A.; Oberlander, T.F. Developmental changes in serotonin signaling: Implications for early brain function, behavior and adaptation. Neuroscience 2017, 342, 212–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. May, J.M.; Qu, Z.-C.; Nazarewicz, R.; Dikalov, S. Ascorbic acid efficiently enhances neuronal synthesis of norepinephrine from dopamine. Brain Res. Bull. 2013, 90, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Haleem, D.J. Improving therapeutics in anorexia nervosa with tryptophan. Life Sci. 2017, 178, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moat, S.J.; Clarke, Z.L.; Madhavan, A.K.; Lewis, M.J.; Lang, D. Folic acid reverses endothelial dysfunction induced by inhibition of tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 530, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sumi-Ichinose, C.; Urano, F.; Kuroda, R.; Ohye, T.; Kojima, M.; Tazawa, M.; Shiraishi, H.; Hagino, Y.; Nagatsu, T.; Nomura, T.; et al. Catecholamines and serotonin are differently regulated by tetrahydrobiopterin: A study from 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase knockout mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 41150–41160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bottiglieri, T.; Laundy, M.; Crellin, R.; Toone, B.K.; Carney, M.W.P.; Reynolds, E.H. Homocysteine, folate, methylation, and monoamine metabolism in depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000, 69, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Folstein, M.; Liu, T.; Peter, I.; Buel, J.; Arsenault, L.; Scott, T.; Qiu, W.W. The homocysteine hypothesis of depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 2007, 164, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gören, J.L.; Stoll, A.L.; Damico, K.E.; Sarmiento, I.A.; Cohen, B.M. Bioavailability and lack of toxicity of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) in humans. Pharmacotherapy 2004, 24, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abeysundera, H.; Gill, R. Possible SAMe-induced mania. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr2018224338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Targum, S.D.; Cameron, B.R.; Ferreira, L.; MacDonald, I.D. An augmentation study of MSI-195 (S-adenosylmethionine) in major depressive disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2018, 107, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sakurai, H.; Carpenter, L.L.; Tyrka, A.R.; Price, L.H.; Papakostas, G.I.; Dording, C.M.; Yeung, A.S.; Cusin, C.; Ludington, E.; Bernard-Negron, R.; et al. Dose increase of S-adenosyl-methionine and escitalopram in a randomized clinical trial for major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 262, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Green, T.; Steingart, L.; Frisch, A.; Zarchi, O.; Weizman, A.; Gothelf, D. The feasibility and safety of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J. Neural Transm. 2012, 119, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bottiglieri, T. S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe): From the bench to the bedside-molecular basis of a pleiotrophic molecule. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 1151S–1157S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. MacDonald, I.D.; Harrison, N.; Takacs-Cox, A.; Purac, A.; Blazek-Welsh, A. S-Adenosylmethionine Formulations with Enhanced Bioavailability 2013, 772. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2512490A4/en (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  65. Cameron, B.R.; Ferreira, L.; MacDonald, I.D. Pharmacokinetic study of a novel oral formulation of S-adenosylmethionine (MSI-195) in healthy subjects: Dose escalation, food effect and comparison to a commercial nutritional supplement product. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2020, 21, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Francioso, A.; Fanelli, S.; D’Erme, M.; Lendaro, E.; Miraglia, N.; Fontana, M.; Cavallaro, R.A.; Mosca, L. Pharmacokinetic properties of a novel formulation of S-adenosyl-l-methionine phytate. Amino Acids 2021, 53, 1559–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sekirov, I.; Russell, S.L.; Caetano M Antunes, L.; Finlay, B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 859–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Lederberg, J.; McCray, A. ’Ome Sweet ’Omics—A Genealogical Treasury of Words | The Scientist Magazine®. Scientist 2001, 15, 8. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sommer, F.; Bäckhed, F. The gut microbiota-masters of host development and physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jandhyala, S.M.; Talukdar, R.; Subramanyam, C.; Vuyyuru, H.; Sasikala, M.; Reddy, D.N. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Icaza-Chávez, M.E. Gut Microbiota in health and disease. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. 2013, 78, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Roy Sarkar, S.; Banerjee, S. Gut microbiota in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Neuroimmunol. 2019, 328, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, H.; Liu, M.; Cao, J.; Li, X.; Fan, D.; Xia, Y.; Lu, X.; Li, J.; Ju, D.; Zhao, H.; et al. The dynamic interplay between the gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Van Ameringen, M.; Turna, J.; Patterson, B.; Pipe, A.; Mao, R.Q.; Anglin, R.; Surette, M.G. The gut microbiome in psychiatry: A primer for clinicians. Depress. Anxiety 2019, 36, 1004–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Miller, I. The gut–brain axis: Historical reflections. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2018, 29, 1542921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Manning, A.; Thompson, W.G.; Heaton, K.; Morris, A. Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br. Med. J. 1978, 2, 653–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Zyoud, S.H.; Smale, S.; Waring, W.S.; Sweileh, W.M.; Al-Jabi, S.W. Global research trends in microbiome-gut-brain axis during 2009–2018: A bibliometric and visualized study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019, 19, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Chu, F.; Shi, M.; Lang, Y.; Shen, D.; Jin, T.; Zhu, J.; Cui, L. Gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Current applications and future perspectives. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Foster, J.A.; Neufeld, K.-A.M. Gut—Brain axis: How the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ait-Belgnaoui, A.; Durand, H.; Cartier, C.; Chaumaz, G.; Eutamene, H.; Ferrier, L.; Houdeau, E.; Fioramonti, J.; Bueno, L.; Theodorou, V. Prevention of gut leakiness by a probiotic treatment leads to attenuated HPA response to an acute psychological stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012, 37, 1885–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Gut-brain axis in 2016: Brain-gut-microbiota axis-mood, metabolism and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Macfarlane, S.; Macfarlane, G.T. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. De Clercq, N.C.; Frissen, M.N.; Groen, A.K.; Nieuwdorp, M. Gut microbiota and the gut-brain axis: New insights in the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome. Psychosom. Med. 2017, 79, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Park, A.J.; Collins, J.; Blennerhassett, P.A.; Ghia, J.E.; Verdu, E.F.; Bercik, P.; Collins, S.M. Altered colonic function and microbiota profile in a mouse model of chronic depression. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2013, 25, 733-e575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Bellavance, M.A.; Rivest, S. The HPA—Immune axis and the immunomodulatory actions of glucocorticoids in the brain. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018, 1693, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bonaz, B.; Bazin, T.; Pellissier, S. The vagus nerve at the interface of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Heijtz, R.D.; Wang, S.; Anuar, F.; Qian, Y.; Björkholm, B.; Samuelsson, A.; Hibberd, M.L.; Forssberg, H.; Pettersson, S. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3047–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Douglas-Escobar, M.; Elliott, E.; Neu, J. Effect of intestinal microbial ecology on the developing brain. JAMA Pediatr. 2013, 167, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, N.; Yun, M.; Oh, Y.J.; Choi, H.J. Mind-altering with the gut: Modulation of the gut-brain axis with probiotics. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. O’Mahony, S.M.; Marchesi, J.R.; Scully, P.; Codling, C.; Ceolho, A.M.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Cryan, J.F.; Dinan, T.G. Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: Implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vetulani, J. Early maternal separation: A rodent model of depression and a prevailing human condition. Pharmacol. Rep. 2013, 65, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Aizawa, E.; Tsuji, H.; Asahara, T.; Takahashi, T.; Teraishi, T.; Yoshida, S.; Ota, M.; Koga, N.; Hattori, K.; Kunugi, H. Possible association of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota of patients with major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 202, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jiang, H.; Ling, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, H.; Ma, Z.; Yin, Y.; Wang, W.; Tang, W.; Tan, Z.; Shi, J.; et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 48, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Ligezka, A.N.; Sonmez, A.I.; Corral-Frias, M.P.; Golebiowski, R.; Lynch, B.; Croarkin, P.E.; Romanowicz, M. A systematic review of microbiome changes and impact of probiotic supplementation in children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 108, 110187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. de Filippis, A.; Ullah, H.; Baldi, A.; Dacrema, M.; Esposito, C.; Garzarella, E.U.; Santarcangelo, C.; Tantipongpiradet, A.; Daglia, M. Gastrointestinal disorders and metabolic syndrome: Dysbiosis as a key link and common bioactive dietary components useful for their treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zuccotti, G.V.; Meneghin, F.; Raimondi, C.; Dilillo, D.; Agostoni, C.; Riva, E.; Giovannini, M. Probiotics in clinical practice: An overview. J. Int. Med. Res. 2008, 36, 1A–53A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ng, Q.X.; Peters, C.; Ho, C.Y.X.; Lim, D.Y.; Yeo, W.S. A meta-analysis of the use of probiotics to alleviate depressive symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 228, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pinto-Sanchez, M.I.; Hall, G.B.; Ghajar, K.; Nardelli, A.; Bolino, C.; Lau, J.T.; Martin, F.P.; Cominetti, O.; Welsh, C.; Rieder, A.; et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: A pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kazemi, A.; Noorbala, A.A.; Azam, K.; Eskandari, M.H.; Djafarian, K. Effect of probiotic and prebiotic vs placebo on psychological outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kato-Kataoka, A.; Nishida, K.; Takada, M.; Suda, K.; Kawai, M.; Shimizu, K.; Kushiro, A.; Hoshi, R.; Watanabe, O.; Igarashi, T.; et al. Fermented milk containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota prevents the onset of physical symptoms in medical students under academic examination stress. Benef. Microbes 2016, 7, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Steenbergen, L.; Sellaro, R.; van Hemert, S.; Bosch, J.A.; Colzato, L.S. A randomized controlled trial to test the effect of multispecies probiotics on cognitive reactivity to sad mood. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 48, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Benton, D.; Williams, C.; Brown, A. Impact of consuming a milk drink containing a probiotic on mood and cognition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Kazemi, A.; Noorbala, A.A.; Azam, K.; Djafarian, K. Effect of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and urinary cortisol levels in patients with major depressive disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Akkasheh, G.; Kashani-Poor, Z.; Tajabadi-Ebrahimi, M.; Jafari, P.; Akbari, H.; Taghizadeh, M.; Memarzadeh, M.R.; Asemi, Z.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 2016, 32, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Chahwan, B.; Kwan, S.; Isik, A.; van Hemert, S.; Burke, C.; Roberts, L. Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 253, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Saxelin, M.; Pessi, T.; Salminen, S. Fecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatine capsules to healthy volunteers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 25, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Reininghaus, E.Z.; Platzer, M.; Kohlhammer-Dohr, A.; Hamm, C.; Mörkl, S.; Bengesser, S.A.; Fellendorf, F.T.; Lahousen-Luxenberger, T.; Leitner-Afschar, B.; Schöggl, H.; et al. Provit: Supplementary probiotic treatment and vitamin b7 in depression—A randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Isolauri, E.; Yelda, S.; Pasi, K.; Heikki, A.; Seppo, S. Probiotics: Effects on immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 444s–450s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Ait-Belgnaoui, A.; Colom, A.; Braniste, V.; Ramalho, L.; Marrot, A.; Cartier, C.; Houdeau, E.; Theodorou, V.; Tompkins, T. Probiotic gut effect prevents the chronic psychological stress-induced brain activity abnormality in mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2014, 26, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dhakal, R.; Bajpai, V.K.; Baek, K.H. Production of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) by microorganisms: A review. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Desbonnet, L.; Garrett, L.; Clarke, G.; Bienenstock, J.; Dinan, T.G. The probiotic Bifidobacteria infantis: An assessment of potential antidepressant properties in the rat. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2008, 43, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Logan, A.C.; Katzman, M. Major depressive disorder: Probiotics may be an adjuvant therapy. Med. Hypotheses 2005, 64, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Birmann, P.T.; Casaril, A.M.; Pesarico, A.P.; Caballero, P.S.; Smaniotto, T.Â.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Moreira, Â.N.; Conceição, F.R.; Sousa, F.S.S.; Collares, T.; et al. Komagataella pastoris KM71H modulates neuroimmune and oxidative stress parameters in animal models of depression: A proposal for a new probiotic with antidepressant-like effect. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 171, 105740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yong, S.J.; Tong, T.; Chew, J.; Lim, W.L. Antidepressive mechanisms of probiotics and their therapeutic potential. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Luca, M.; di Mauro, M.; di Mauro, M.; Luca, A. Gut microbiota in Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and type 2 diabetes mellitus: The role of oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 4730539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Bravo, J.A.; Forsythe, P.; Chew, M.V.; Escaravage, E.; Savignac, H.M.; Dinan, T.G.; Bienenstock, J.; Cryan, J.F. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16050–16055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Sackeim, H.A.; Rush, A.J.; George, M.S.; Marangell, L.B.; Husain, M.M.; Nahas, Z.; Johnson, C.R.; Seidman, S.; Giller, C.; Haines, S.; et al. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNSTM) for treatment-resistant depression: Efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001, 25, 713–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Dhaliwal, J.; Singh, D.P.; Singh, S.; Pinnaka, A.K.; Boparai, R.K.; Bishnoi, M.; Kondepudi, K.K.; Chopra, K. Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 9510 supplementation protects from chronic unpredictable and sleep deprivation-induced behaviour, biochemical and selected gut microbial aberrations in mice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Matt, S.M.; Allen, J.M.; Lawson, M.A.; Mailing, L.J.; Woods, J.A.; Johnson, R.W. Butyrate and dietary soluble fiber improve neuroinflammation associated with aging in mice. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lee, H.J.; Yeonghoon Son, M.L.; Moon, C.; Kim, S.H.; Shin, I.S.; Yang, M.; Bae, S.; Kim, J.S. Sodium butyrate prevents radiation-induced cognitive impairment by restoring PCREB/BDNF expression. Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 1530–1535. [Google Scholar]
  124. Liu, Y.W.; Liu, W.H.; Wu, C.C.; Juan, Y.C.; Wu, Y.C.; Tsai, H.P.; Wang, S.; Tsai, Y.C. Psychotropic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in early life-stressed and naïve adult mice. Brain Res. 2016, 1631, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Tian, P.; Wang, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Bifidobacterium with the role of 5-hydroxytryptophan synthesis regulation alleviates the symptom of depression and related microbiota dysbiosis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 66, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Réus, G.Z.; Jansen, K.; Titus, S.; Carvalho, A.F.; Gabbay, V.; Quevedo, J. Kynurenine pathway dysfunction in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression: Evidences from animal and human studies. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 68, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Wei, C.L.; Wang, S.; Yen, J.T.; Cheng, Y.F.; Liao, C.L.; Hsu, C.C.; Wu, C.C.; Tsai, Y.C. Antidepressant-like activities of live and heat-killed Lactobacillus paracasei PS23 in chronic corticosterone-treated mice and possible mechanisms. Brain Res. 2019, 1711, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Li, N.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Sun, A.; Lin, Y.; Jin, Y.; Li, X. Oral probiotics ameliorate the behavioral deficits induced by chronic mild stress in mice via the gut microbiota-inflammation axis. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Warner, B.B. The contribution of the gut microbiome to neurodevelopment and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pediatr. Res. 2019, 85, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Berk, M.; Williams, L.J.; Jacka, F.N.; O’Neil, A.; Pasco, J.A.; Moylan, S.; Allen, N.B.; Stuart, A.L.; Hayley, A.C.; Byrne, M.L.; et al. So depression is an inflammatory disease, but where does the inflammation come from? BMC Med. 2013, 11, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Vitetta, L.; Bambling, M.; Alford, H. The gastrointestinal tract microbiome, probiotics, and mood. Inflammopharmacology 2014, 22, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Clarke, G.; Grenham, S.; Scully, P.; Fitzgerald, P.; Moloney, R.D.; Shanahan, F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Koppel, N.; Rekdal, V.M.; Balskus, E.P. Chemical transformation of xenobiotics by the human gut microbiota. Science 2017, 356, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kim, J.Y.; Suh, J.W.; Ji, G.E. Evaluation of S-adenosyl-l-methionine production by Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 17, 184–187. [Google Scholar]
  135. Saccarello, A.; Montarsolo, P.; Massardo, I.; Picciotto, R.; Pedemonte, A.; Castagnaro, R.; Brasesco, P.C.; Guida, V.; Picco, P.; Fioravanti, P.; et al. Oral administration of S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL9 improves the mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020, 22, 19m02578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.