Advancing Ecological Restoration in a Mining City: Insights from Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms
Highlights
- Constructed an EDS (Elements-Disturbances-Status) cyclical logic framework for assessing ecological restoration in mining areas.
- Revealed spatiotemporal patterns and key driving mechanisms of ecological quality in mining cities using an ensemble learning model.
- Provides a transferable framework for dynamic evaluation of ecological restoration effectiveness in human-disturbed regions.
- Offers practical insights for enhancing ecological resilience and informing adaptive management policies in mining cities.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources and Processing
3. Methodology
3.1. EDS-Guided Ecological Quality Indicator System
3.2. A Game Combination Weighting Model for Multidimensional Heterogeneity
3.2.1. Objective Weighting I: Entropy
3.2.2. Objective Weighting II: CRITIC
3.2.3. Cooperative Combination of Weighting Schemes
3.2.4. EQA Synthesis, Mapping, and Grading
3.3. Identification of Key Driving Factors of Ecological Quality
3.3.1. Selecting Potential Drivers: Climate, Anthropogenic Disturbances, and Economic Factors
3.3.2. Optimized XGBoost Model for Driver Relationship Modeling
3.3.3. SHAP Analysis for Enhanced XGBoost Interpretability
4. Results
4.1. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Ecological Quality in Mining Areas
4.2. Trajectories and Transitions of Ecological Quality in Mining Areas
4.3. Spatiotemporal Variations in Ecological Quality at Typical Mining Sites
4.4. Key Driving Factors and Their Nonlinear Effects in Ecological Quality
5. Discussion
5.1. Spatiotemporal Response of Ecological Quality Dynamics to Ecological Restoration Engineering
5.2. Impacts of Key Drivers on Mining Ecological Quality Improvement
5.3. From Insight to Action: Building an Adaptive Management Framework for Sustainable Mining
5.4. Limitations and Prospects
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. The Indicator Calculation of EQA
- (1)
- Elements
- (2)
- Disturbances
- (3)
- Status
- (4)
- Normalization of multi-source heterogeneous data
Appendix B
| Indicators | Entropy Weight | CRITIC Weight | Combined Weight | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2023 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2023 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2023 | |
| MNDWI | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| MSI | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| WET | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Soil erosion | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| EVI | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| GCI | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| SHDI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| DEM | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Slope | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Geological disaster | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Mine distribution | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Vegetation cover | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| CONTAG | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Patch density | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| NPP | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Appendix C. Grading Process of Ecosystem Quality in Mining Areas


| Grade | Typical Landscape | Feature Description |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | ![]() | Dominated by continuous, healthy vegetation (typically dense forest or well-established restoration cover) with a uniform dark-green tone, low bare-soil exposure, and high landscape connectivity. Water-buffer zones and stable natural patches are common; mining scars are largely absent or fully integrated into surrounding greenery. |
| Good | ![]() | Vegetation cover remains high but shows moderate heterogeneity (e.g., mosaic of forest–cropland–restored slopes). Mining traces are limited and often appear as small, isolated patches; restored areas are recognizable by consistent greening and improved patch cohesion compared with degraded classes. |
| Moderate | ![]() | Transitional landscapes with patchy vegetation and noticeable soil exposure. Typical patterns include mixed cropland/village edges and restoration-in-progress zones, where greening occurs in discontinuous strips or blocks, reflecting partial recovery and moderate fragmentation. |
| Fair | ![]() | Cropland-dominated mosaic with large, regular fields and frequent seasonal bare soil, showing bright yellow–brown tones. Linear canals/roads and scattered settlements are prominent, while vegetation is mainly limited to narrow shelterbelts and riparian strips, resulting in fragmented cover and low connectivity. |
| Poor | ![]() | Highly disturbed mine–urban interface with extensive impervious/industrial surfaces and transport corridors, adjacent to open-pit excavation and exposed substrates. Strongly heterogeneous bright gray–tan tones, sharp engineered boundaries, and minimal fragmented vegetation. |
Appendix D. The Driving Factors Calculation of EQA
Appendix E
| Parameters | Functions | Search Range | Final Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2023 | |||
| n_estimators | Defines the number of trees in XGBoost, corresponding to model iterations count | 100~1000 | 650 | 360 | 643 | 656 |
| max_depth | Controls the maximum depth of each tree, influencing model complexity | 3~10 | 6.67 | 9.09 | 9.24 | 8.88 |
| reg_alpha | Regulates L1 regularization strength to prevent overfitting | 0.01~1.0 | 0.51 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.84 |
| min_child_weight | Sets the minimum sample weight per leaf node to mitigate overfitting | 1~10 | 4.12 | 7.62 | 4.07 | 4.84 |
| colsample_bynode | Controls the feature sampling ratio for each tree node | 0.5~1 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.8 | 0.91 |
| subsample | Controls the sample sampling ratio for training each tree | 0.5~1 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
| learning_rate | Regulates each tree’s contribution to the final prediction | 0.01~0.3 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| scale_pos_weight | Handles class imbalance | 0.5~2 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 1.13 | 1.74 |
References
- Campbell, T.; Dixon, K.W.; Bradshaw, S.D.; Gann, G.D.; Hartley, W.; Lambers, H.; Wardell-Johnson, G. Standards-Based Evaluation Inform Ecological Restoration Outcomes for a Major Mining Activity in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot. Restor. Ecol. 2024, 32, e14236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worlanyo, A.S.; Li, J. Evaluating the Environmental and Economic Impact of Mining for Post-Mined Land Restoration and Land-Use: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, W.-B.; Li, H.-D.; Lei, S.-G.; Xu, X.-H.; Xue, S.-G. Good Governance Can Save China’s Mine Ecosystems. Science 2024, 383, 157–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Xu, D.; Xu, Z.; Tang, H.; Jiang, H.; Dong, J.; Liu, Y. Ten Key Issues for Ecological Restoration of Territorial Space. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strassburg, B.B.N.; Iribarrem, A.; Beyer, H.L.; Cordeiro, C.L.; Crouzeilles, R.; Jakovac, C.C.; Braga Junqueira, A.; Lacerda, E.; Latawiec, A.E.; Balmford, A.; et al. Global Priority Areas for Ecosystem Restoration. Nature 2020, 586, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aronson, J.; Goodwin, N.; Orlando, L.; Eisenberg, C.; Cross, A.T. A World of Possibilities: Six Restoration Strategies to Support the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, J.; Riechers, M.; Loos, J.; Martin-Lopez, B.; Temperton, V.M. Making the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration a Social-Ecological Endeavour. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, D.; Dong, J. Research on Ecological Restoration and Its Impact on Society in Coal Resource-Based Areas: Lessons from the Ruhr Area in Germany and the Liulin Area in China. Geoforum 2024, 154, 104038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Guo, J. Sustainable Transition of Mining Cities in China: Literature Review and Policy Analysis. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 101867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Feng, Y. Temporal and Spatial Change of Land Use in a Large-Scale Opencast Coal Mine Area: A Complex Network Approach. Land Use Policy 2019, 86, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonter, L.J.; Moran, C.J.; Barrett, D.J.; Soares-Filho, B.S. Processes of Land Use Change in Mining Regions. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 84, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Hou, X.; Wang, Z.; Shen, Y. Study the Effect of Industrial Structure Optimization on Urban Land-Use Efficiency in China. Land Use Policy 2021, 105, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Hassink, R. Exploring Adaptation and Adaptability in Uneven Economic Resilience: A Tale of Two Chinese Mining Regions. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2017, 10, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Feng, F.; Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Jia, B.; Lafortezza, R. Ecological Transformation Is the Key to Improve Ecosystem Health for Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study in China Based on Future Development Scenarios. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 921, 171147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Gu, T.; Xiang, J.; Luo, T.; Zeng, J.; Yuan, Y. Ecological Restoration Zoning of Territorial Space in China: An Ecosystem Health Perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 364, 121371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Zhang, F.; Duan, P.; Jim, C.Y.; Chan, N.W.; Shi, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Bahtebay, J.; Ma, X. Vegetation Cover Changes in China Induced by Ecological Restoration-Protection Projects and Land-Use Changes from 2000 to 2020. Catena 2022, 217, 106530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo-Vega, J.M.; Gómez-Villar, A.; Santos-González, J.; González-Gutiérrez, R.B.; Álvarez-Martínez, J. Changes in Land Use Due to Mining in the North-Western Mountains of Spain during the Previous 50years. CATENA 2017, 149, 844–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aires, U.R.V.; Santos, B.S.M.; Coelho, C.D.; da Silva, D.D.; Calijuri, M.L. Changes in Land Use and Land Cover as a Result of the Failure of a Mining Tailings Dam in Mariana, MG, Brazil. Land Use Policy 2018, 70, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; He, T.; Zhang, M.; Wu, C. Spatiotemporal Variations in the Eco-Health Condition of China’s Long-Term Stable Cultivated Land Using Google Earth Engine from 2001 to 2019. Appl. Geogr. 2022, 149, 102819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karan, S.K.; Samadder, S.R.; Maiti, S.K. Assessment of the Capability of Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for Monitoring Reclamation Success in Coal Mine Degraded Lands. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 182, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Z.; Li, J.; Zipper, C.E.; Shen, Y.; Miao, H.; Donovan, P.F. Identification of the Disturbance and Trajectory Types in Mining Areas Using Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 916–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Guo, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, W.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Cui, X.; Cao, X. Replacing the Red Band with the Red-SWIR Band (0.74ρred+0.26ρswir) Can Reduce the Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices to Soil Background. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, W.; Xu, C.; Wu, J.; Cheng, S. Ecological Effect Assessment Based on the DPSIR Model of a Polluted Urban River during Restoration: A Case Study of the Nanfei River, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, N.; Li, W.; Gu, X.; Liu, Y. Biomass Estimation for Semiarid Vegetation and Mine Rehabilitation Using Worldview-3 and Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Li, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, K.; Li, L.; Li, D. Ecological Security Assessment of “Grain-for-Green” Program Typical Areas in Northern China Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Dong, S.; Wen, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y. Three-Dimensional Framework of Vigor, Organization, and Resilience (VOR) for Assessing Rangeland Health: A Case Study from the Alpine Meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Ecohealth 2013, 10, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malekmohammadi, B.; Jahanishakib, F. Vulnerability Assessment of Wetland Landscape Ecosystem Services Using Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) Model. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 82, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, R.; Fang, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, X. Evaluating Urban Ecosystem Resilience Using the DPSIR Framework and the ENA Model: A Case Study of 35 Cities in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 72, 102997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. Potential Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Loss of Ecosystem Services Due to Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 171, 103389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, D.; Erskine, P.D.; Fletcher, A. Widening Gap between Expectations and Practice in Australian Minesite Rehabilitation. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2015, 16, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, L.; Shao, Q. Soil Conservation Service Spatiotemporal Variability and Its Driving Mechanism on the Guizhou Plateau, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harries, K.L.; Woinarski, J.; Rumpff, L.; Gardener, M.; Erskine, P.D. Characteristics and Gaps in the Assessment of Progress in Mine Restoration: Insights from Five Decades of Published Literature Relating to Native Ecosystem Restoration after Mining. Restor. Ecol. 2024, 32, e14016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Shi, X. Detection of Social-Ecological Drivers and Impact Thresholds of Ecological Degradation and Ecological Restoration in the Last Three Decades. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 318, 115513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanes, M.; Ochoa-Quintero, J.M.; de Oliveira Roque, F.; Sugai, L.S.M.; Tambosi, L.R.; Lourival, R.; Laurance, S. Incorporating Resilience and Cost in Ecological Restoration Strategies at Landscape Scale. Ecol. Soc. 2016, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Ruan, L.; Yue, W.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y. Construction of a multi-scale effectiveness evaluation system for ecological restoration and protection of territorial space. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2023, 34, 2566–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Feng, D.; Cao, E. Dynamic Changes in Landscape Pattern in a Large-Scale Opencast Coal Mine Area from 1986 to 2015: A Complex Network Approach. Catena 2020, 194, 104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, S. Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Services in Resource-Based Cities in Semiarid Regions. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Zhu, S.; Guo, J.; Sun, X. Exploring the Quality of Ecosystem Services and the Segmental Impact of Influencing Factors in Resource-Based Cities. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 375, 124411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundberg, S.M.; Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; Curran Associates, Inc.: Nice, France, 2017; Volume 30. [Google Scholar]
- Ouyang, N.; Rui, X.; Zhang, X.; Tang, H.; Xie, Y. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Health and Its Driving Factors in the Southwestern Karst Regions of China. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 166, 112530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Gong, J.; Teng, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, T.; Jin, T. Climate Change and Human Activities Have Resulted in Substantial Alterations to Ecosystem Quality within the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin. Ecol. Front. 2025, 45, 925–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhou, R.; Rui, J.; Yu, Y. Revealing the Impact of Urban Spatial Morphology on Land Surface Temperature in Plain and Plateau Cities Using Explainable Machine Learning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 118, 106046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, X.; Wang, S.; Yao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, R.; Zhou, Y. Evaluation on Geological Environment Carrying Capacity of Mining City—A Case Study in Huangshi City, Hubei Province, China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 102, 102410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; You, S.; Ren, C. Evaluation of tourism and recreation value of mining heritage in the context of transformation of resource-depleted cities: Take Huangshi National Mine Park as an example. J. Nat. Sci. Hunan Norm. Univ. 2023, 46, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Cao, Q.; Gu, X.; Lu, Y.; Luo, Y. Exploring an Adaptive Management Model for “Status-Optimization-Regulation” of Mining City in Transition: A Case Study of Huangshi, China. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 172, 103438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Fu, Q.; Wu, X. Spatial Pattern of “City-Brown-Green” in Resource-Exhausted Cities:A Case Study of Huangshi City, Hubei Province. Landsc. Archit. 2021, 28, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Fang, S. Identifying and Zoning Key Areas of Ecological Restoration for Territory in Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Huangshi City, China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermote, E.; Justice, C.; Claverie, M.; Franch, B. Preliminary Analysis of the Performance of the Landsat 8/OLI Land Surface Reflectance Product. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Markham, B.; Barsi, J.; Kvaran, G.; Ong, L.; Kaita, E.; Biggar, S.; Czapla-Myers, J.; Mishra, N.; Helder, D. Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager Radiometric Calibration and Stability. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 12275–12308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, D.P.; Kovalskyy, V.; Zhang, H.K.; Vermote, E.F.; Yan, L.; Kumar, S.S.; Egorov, A. Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 Reflective Wavelength and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Continuity. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). Guidance on Cultivating and Developing Modern Metropolitan Circles (No. NDRC Planning [2019] 328); NDRC: Beijing, China, 2019. Available online: https://zfxxgk.ndrc.gov.cn/web/iteminfo.jsp?id=807 (accessed on 2 February 2026).
- Hubei Provincial People’s Government. A Green Transformation of a Historic Mining City: The Story of Huangshi’s Journey to Becoming a “National Forest City”; Hubei Provincial People’s Government: Wuhan, China, 2018. Available online: https://www.hubei.gov.cn/hbfb/szsm/201811/t20181105_1548563.shtml (accessed on 2 February 2026).
- Huangshi Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau. Mountains Regaining Green: An Overview of Huangshi’s Progress in Mine Ecological Restoration; Huangshi Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau: Huangshi, China, 2023. Available online: https://sthjj.huangshi.gov.cn/ztzl/sjhbdczgjxs/mtbd2/202312/t20231218_1081159.html (accessed on 2 February 2026).
- Rounsevell, M.D.A.; Pedroli, B.; Erb, K.-H.; Gramberger, M.; Busck, A.G.; Haberl, H.; Kristensen, S.; Kuemmerle, T.; Lavorel, S.; Lindner, M.; et al. Challenges for Land System Science. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuurman, G.W.; Cole, D.N.; Cravens, A.E.; Covington, S.; Crausbay, S.D.; Hoffman, C.H.; Lawrence, D.J.; Magness, D.R.; Morton, J.M.; Nelson, E.A.; et al. Navigating Ecological Transformation: Resist–Accept–Direct as a Path to a New Resource Management Paradigm. Bioscience 2022, 72, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.-C.; Zheng, H.-X.; Liu, W.-S.; Liu, C.; Guo, M.-N.; Huot, H.; Morel, J.L.; Qiu, R.-L.; Chao, Y.; Tang, Y.-T. Plant-Soil Feedbacks for the Restoration of Degraded Mine Lands: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 751794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doley, D.; Audet, P. Adopting Novel Ecosystems as Suitable Rehabilitation Alternatives for Former Mine Sites. Ecol. Process. 2013, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suding, K.N.; Gross, K.L.; Houseman, G.R. Alternative States and Positive Feedbacks in Restoration Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, S.; Bian, Z.; Yang, Y. Discussion on the guided restoration for mine ecosystem. J. China Coal Soc. 2022, 47, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maes, S.L.; Perring, M.P.; Cohen, R.; Akinnifesi, F.K.; Bargués-Tobella, A.; Bastin, J.-F.; Bauters, M.; Bernardino, P.N.; Brancalion, P.H.S.; Bullock, J.M.; et al. Explore before You Restore: Incorporating Complex Systems Thinking in Ecosystem Restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2024, 61, 922–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Q.; Bai, Z.; Cao, Y.; Xie, M.; Hu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, Y. Ecological risk assessment of land destruction in large open-pit mine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, R.E.; Gann, G.D.; Walder, B.; Liu, J.; Cui, W.; Newton, V.; Nelson, C.R.; Tashe, N.; Jasper, D.; Silveira, F.A.O.; et al. International Principles and Standards for the Ecological Restoration and Recovery of Mine Sites. Restor. Ecol. 2022, 30, e13771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, W.; Xia, H.; Liu, Y.; Xu, J.; Xiong, J. Assessing Ecological Conservation Redline from Element, Structure, and Function Dimensions: A Case of Zhejiang Province, China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2024, 106, 107485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Long, B.; Huang, D. Harmony in Extraction: A Variable Weight Theory Approach to Unraveling the Ecological Security Veins in China’s Rare Earth Mining under Variable Pressures. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2024, 17, 10726–10739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Lv, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, H.; Li, J. Ecological Resilience Assessment of an Arid Coal Mining Area Using Index of Entropy and Linear Weighted Analysis: A Case Study of Shendong Coalfield, China. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Tian, D.; Yan, F. Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, e3564835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L. Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The Critic Method. Comput. Oper. Res. 1995, 22, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Žižović, M.; Miljković, B.; Marinković, D. Objective Methods for Determining Criteria Weight Coefficients: A Modification of the CRITIC Method. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2020, 3, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, S. Assessing Integrated Effectiveness of Rural Socio-Economic Development and Environmental Protection of Wenchuan County in Southwestern China: An Approach Using Game Theory and VIKOR. Land 2022, 11, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Li, Z.; He, Q. Suitability Assessment of Multilayer Urban Underground Space Based on Entropy and CRITIC Combined Weighting Method: A Case Study in Xiong’an New Area, China. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, X.; Sun, H.; Yu, Q.; Shou, W.; Wang, J. A Game-Theoretic Combination Weighting–TOPSIS Integrated Model for Sustainable Floodplain Risk Assessment Under Multi-Return-Period Scenarios. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Zhang, J. Urban Flooding Risk Assessment Based on GIS- Game Theory Combination Weight: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 77, 103080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, X. Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Tarim River Basin under Game Theory Combination Weights. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 154, 110609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, S. Construction of Landscape Ecological Network Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in a Large-Scale Opencast Coal Mine Area. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 125523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Zhang, S.; Cao, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, Y. The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services Bundles and the Social-Economic-Ecological Drivers in the Yellow River Delta Region. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 135, 108573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klaus, V.H.; Kiehl, K. A Conceptual Framework for Urban Ecological Restoration and Rehabilitation. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2021, 52, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Li, W.; Qiao, W.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z. Effect of Natural Conditions and Mining Activities on Vegetation Variations in Arid and Semiarid Mining Regions. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 103, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, P.; Zhang, W.; Ma, X. Vegetation Changes in Coal Mining Areas: Naturally or Anthropogenically Driven? Catena 2022, 208, 105712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; Bai, Z.; Reading, L. Effects of Surface Coal Mining and Land Reclamation on Soil Properties: A Review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 191, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, Y. Effects of Land Subsidence Resulted from Coal Mining on Soil Nutrient Distributions in a Loess Area of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Chen, T.; Zhen, N.; Niu, R. Monitoring the Effects of Open-Pit Mining on the Eco-Environment Using a Moving Window-Based Remote Sensing Ecological Index. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 15716–15728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, R.; Eriksson, D.; McCourt, M.; Kiili, J.; Laaksonen, E.; Xu, Z.; Guyon, I. Bayesian Optimization Is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020. In Proceedings of the Neurips 2020 Competition and Demonstration Track, Virtual, 6–14 December 2021; PMLR, 2021; pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, A.; Falkner, S.; Bartels, S.; Hennig, P.; Hutter, F. Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasets. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Lauderdale, FL, USA, 20–22 April 2017; PMLR, 2017; pp. 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassija, V.; Chamola, V.; Mahapatra, A.; Singal, A.; Goel, D.; Huang, K.; Scardapane, S.; Spinelli, I.; Mahmud, M.; Hussain, A. Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cogn. Comput. 2024, 16, 45–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosca, E.; Szigeti, F.; Tragianni, S.; Gallagher, D.; Groh, G. SHAP-Based Explanation Methods: A Review for NLP Interpretability. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, 12–17 October 2022; Calzolari, N., Huang, C.-R., Kim, H., Pustejovsky, J., Wanner, L., Choi, K.-S., Ryu, P.-M., Chen, H.-H., Donatelli, L., Ji, H., et al., Eds.; International Committee on Computational Linguistics: Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, 2022; pp. 4593–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Yuan, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, G. Emergy Evaluation of a Swamp Dike-Pond Complex: A New Ecological Restoration Mode of Coal-Mining Subsidence Areas in China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 107, 105660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X.; Fang, D.; Chen, B.; Wang, H. Multiobjective Layout Optimization for Low Impact Development Considering Its Ecosystem Services. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 209, 107794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Li, H.; Huang, Y. The Complex Ecological Network’s Resilience of the Wuhan Metropolitan Area. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 130, 108101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, A.J.; Thompson, L.M.; Morton, J.M.; Beever, E.A.; Clifford, M.; Limpinsel, D.; Magill, R.T.; Magness, D.R.; Melvin, T.A.; Newman, R.A.; et al. RAD Adaptive Management for Transforming Ecosystems. Bioscience 2022, 72, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandyopadhyay, S.; Maiti, S.K. Evaluation of Ecological Restoration Success in Mining-Degraded Lands. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2019, 29, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaiswal, P. Restoration Planning of Mining Wastelands. J. Bot. Res. 2023, 5, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Zheng, H.; Li, J.; Qin, T.; Guo, J.; Du, M. A Method for Identifying the Spatial Range of Mining Disturbance Based on Contribution Quantification and Significance Test. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Lei, S.; Lu, Q.; Bian, Z.; Ge, S. Spatial Distribution of the Impact of Surface Mining on the Landscape Ecological Health of Semi-Arid Grasslands. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 111, 105996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Jia, Q.; Xu, X.; Yao, S.; Chen, H.; Hou, X. Contribution of Ecological Policies to Vegetation Restoration: A Case Study from Wuqi County in Shaanxi Province, China. Land Use Policy 2018, 73, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Rao, Y.; Geng, Y.; Fu, M.; Prishchepov, A.V. A Novel Understanding of Land Use Characteristics Caused by Mining Activities: A Case Study of Wu’an, China. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 99, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Q.; Wu, Z.; Xie, D. Transformation and Development of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 975669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Ma, Z.; van der Kuijp, T.J.; Yuan, Z.; Huang, L. A Review of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution from Mines in China: Pollution and Health Risk Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rout, T.K.; Masto, R.E.; Ram, L.C.; George, J.; Padhy, P.K. Assessment of Human Health Risks from Heavy Metals in Outdoor Dust Samples in a Coal Mining Area. Environ. Geochem. Health 2013, 35, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loupasakis, C.; Angelitsa, V.; Rozos, D.; Spanou, N. Mining Geohazards—Land Subsidence Caused by the Dewatering of Opencast Coal Mines: The Case Study of the Amyntaio Coal Mine, Florina, Greece. Nat. Hazards 2014, 70, 675–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.-Y.; Xu, Y.-S.; Shen, S.-L.; Yuan, Y.; Yin, Z.-Y. Mining-Induced Geo-Hazards with Environmental Protection Measures in Yunnan, China: An Overview. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2015, 74, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, J. Climate Change and Surface Mining: A Review of Environment-Human Interactions & Their Spatial Dynamics. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 74, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barral, M.P.; Rey Benayas, J.M.; Meli, P.; Maceira, N.O. Quantifying the Impacts of Ecological Restoration on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Agroecosystems: A Global Meta-Analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 202, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knapp, M.; Teder, T.; Lukas, V.; Štrobl, M.; Knappová, J.; Landis, D.A.; González, E. Ecologically-Informed Precision Conservation: A Framework for Increasing Biodiversity in Intensively Managed Agricultural Landscapes with Minimal Sacrifice in Crop Production. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 288, 110343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liccari, F.; Boscutti, F.; Bacaro, G.; Sigura, M. Connectivity, Landscape Structure, and Plant Diversity across Agricultural Landscapes: Novel Insight into Effective Ecological Network Planning. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 317, 115358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulpinar Sekban, D.U.; Acar, C. Determining Usages in Post-Mining Sites According to Landscape Design Approaches. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 2661–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovell, S.T.; Johnston, D.M. Creating Multifunctional Landscapes: How Can the Field of Ecology Inform the Design of the Landscape? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyer, C.P.O.; Rammig, A.; Brouwers, N.; Langerwisch, F. Forest Resilience, Tipping Points and Global Change Processes. J. Ecol. 2015, 103, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintero-Angel, M.; Cerón-Hernández, V.A.; Ospina-Salazar, D.I. Applications and Perspectives for Land Restoration through Nature-Based Solutions. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2023, 36, 100518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, H.; Cundill, G. Towards Increased Community-Engaged Ecological Restoration: A Review of Current Practice and Future Directions. Ecol. Restor. 2018, 36, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galbraith, M.; Towns, D.R.; Bollard, B.; MacDonald, E.A. Ecological Restoration Success from Community and Agency Perspectives: Exploring the Differences. Restor. Ecol. 2021, 29, e13405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Data Type | Data Description | Resolution | Data Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote sensing imagery | Landsat-5/8/9 | 30 m | https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions (accessed on 19 November 2024) |
| Land use | CLCD | 30 m | https://zenodo.org/records/12779975 (accessed on 19 November 2024) |
| Topographic data | NASA Digital Elevation Model (2020) | 30 m | https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov (accessed on 19 November 2024) |
| Geological data | Geohazard points (Up to 2023) | / | http://data.huangshi.gov.cn/portal/#/index (accessed on 9 May 2024) |
| Meteorological data | Monthly Precipitation | 1 km | https://www.geodata.cn/main/ (accessed on 7 January 2025) |
| Monthly Temperature | 1 km | https://www.geodata.cn/main/ (accessed on 7 January 2025) | |
| Solar radiation | 0.04° | https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191 | |
| Vegetation data | Monthly NDVI | 250 m | https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/home (accessed on 7 January 2025) |
| Soil data | HWSD V2 (2023) | 1 km | https://gaez.fao.org/pages/hwsd (accessed on 7 January 2025) |
| Socioeconomic data | Nighttime light data | 500 m | https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/harvard (accessed on 24 April 2025) |
| Population distribution | 1 km | https://landscan.ornl.gov/ (accessed on 24 April 2025) | |
| Mining companies (Up to 2023) | / | https://lbs.amap.com (accessed on 10 February 2024) |
| Framework | Guidance | Indicators | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elements | Surface environment | Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) | Positive |
| Moisture Stress Index (MSI) | Negative | ||
| Wetness Index (WET) | Positive | ||
| Soil Erosion | Negative | ||
| Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) | Positive | ||
| Green Coverage Index (GCI) | Positive | ||
| Shannon’s Diversity Index (SHDI) | Positive | ||
| Geological environment | DEM | Positive | |
| Slope | Positive | ||
| Distance to geological hazard points | Positive | ||
| Disturbances | Mine exploitation | Distance to the mining areas | Positive |
| Ecological remediation | Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) | Positive | |
| Status | Ecosystem structure | CONTAG | Positive |
| Patch density | Negative | ||
| Ecosystem function | Net Primary Productivity (NPP) | Positive |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Cheng, L.; Niu, Z.; Su, X.; Feng, H.; He, Q. Advancing Ecological Restoration in a Mining City: Insights from Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040558
Li Y, Wang L, Cheng L, Niu Z, Su X, Feng H, He Q. Advancing Ecological Restoration in a Mining City: Insights from Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(4):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040558
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Yingshuang, Lunche Wang, Luyao Cheng, Zigeng Niu, Xin Su, Haibo Feng, and Qiuhua He. 2026. "Advancing Ecological Restoration in a Mining City: Insights from Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms" Remote Sensing 18, no. 4: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040558
APA StyleLi, Y., Wang, L., Cheng, L., Niu, Z., Su, X., Feng, H., & He, Q. (2026). Advancing Ecological Restoration in a Mining City: Insights from Ecological Quality Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms. Remote Sensing, 18(4), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040558






