Next Article in Journal
P-Band UAV-SAR 4D Imaging: A Multi-Master Differential SAR Tomography Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
A Class-Incremental Learning Method for SAR Images Based on Self-Sustainment Guidance Representation
Previous Article in Journal
Holocene Activity of the Wudaoliang–Changshagongma Fault of the Eastern Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Special Issue
Few-Shot PolSAR Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric Features Selection and Improved Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Storage Tank Detection Methods Based on Deep Learning

1
College of Oceanography and Space Informatics, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
2
Technical Test Centre of Sinopec, Shengli Oil Field, Dongying 257000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(9), 2460; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092460
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 7 May 2023

Abstract

Since the Industrial Revolution, methane has become the second most important greenhouse gas component after CO2 and the second most important culprit of global warming, leading to serious climate change problems such as droughts, fires, floods, and glacial melting. While most of the methane in the atmosphere comes from emissions from energy activities such as petroleum refining, storage tanks are an important source of methane emissions during the extraction and processing of crude oil and natural gas. Therefore, the use of high-resolution remote sensing image data for oil and gas production sites to achieve efficient and accurate statistics for storage tanks is important to promote the strategic goals of “carbon neutrality and carbon peaking”. Compared with traditional statistical methods for studying oil storage tanks, deep learning-based target detection algorithms are more powerful for multi-scale targets and complex background conditions. In this paper, five deep learning detection algorithms, Faster RCNN, YOLOv5, YOLOv7, RetinaNet and SSD, were selected to conduct experiments on 3568 remote sensing images from five different datasets. The results show that the average accuracy of the Faster RCNN, YOLOv5, YOLOv7 and SSD algorithms is above 0.84, and the F1 scores of YOLOv5, YOLOv7 and SSD algorithms are above 0.80, among which the highest detection accuracy is shown by the SSD algorithm at 0.897 with a high F1 score, while the lowest average accuracy is shown by RetinaNet at only 0.639. The training results of the five algorithms were validated on three images containing differently sized oil storage tanks in complex backgrounds, and the validation results obtained were better, providing more accurate references for practical detection applications in remote sensing of oil storage tank targets in the future.
Keywords: remote sensing image; target detection; tank detection; deep learning remote sensing image; target detection; tank detection; deep learning
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, L.; Chen, X.; Wan, Y.; Dai, Y. Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Storage Tank Detection Methods Based on Deep Learning. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092460

AMA Style

Fan L, Chen X, Wan Y, Dai Y. Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Storage Tank Detection Methods Based on Deep Learning. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(9):2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Lu, Xiaoying Chen, Yong Wan, and Yongshou Dai. 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Storage Tank Detection Methods Based on Deep Learning" Remote Sensing 15, no. 9: 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092460

APA Style

Fan, L., Chen, X., Wan, Y., & Dai, Y. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Storage Tank Detection Methods Based on Deep Learning. Remote Sensing, 15(9), 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop