Next Article in Journal
Triple-Frequency Code-Phase Combination Determination: A Comparison with the Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena Combination Using BDS Signals
Next Article in Special Issue
A General Approach to Enhance Short Wave Satellite Imagery by Removing Background Atmospheric Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Siamese-GAN: Learning Invariant Representations for Aerial Vehicle Image Categorization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Products to Constrain the Aerosol Type in the Atmospheric Correction Processor MAJA

Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise

SERCO SpA c/o European Space Agency ESA-ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy
NASA/GSFC Code 619, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
European Space Agency ESA-ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy
VITO, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Regional and Environmental Sciences, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany
Centre d’études Spatiales de la Biosphère, CESBIO Unite mixte Université de Toulouse-CNES-CNRS-IRD, 18 Avenue E.Belin, 31401 Toulouse CEDEX 9, France
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section Remote Sensing, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Brockmann Consult GmbH, Max-Planck-Straße 2, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
National Earth and Marine Observation Branch, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Telespazio France, SSA Business Unit (Satellite Systems & Applications), 31023 Toulouse CEDEX 1, France
ACRI-ST, 260 Route du Pin Montard, BP 234, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis CEDEX, France
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., 10210 Greenbelt Road, Suite 600, Lanham, MD 20706, USA
German Aerospace Center (DLR) Remote Sensing Technology Institute Photogrammetry and Image Analysis Rutherfordstraße 2, 12489 Berlin-Adlershof, Germany
Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences (RBINS), Operational Directorate Natural Environment, 100 Gulledelle, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Geomatics Lab, Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(2), 352;
Received: 24 January 2018 / Revised: 16 February 2018 / Accepted: 20 February 2018 / Published: 24 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atmospheric Correction of Remote Sensing Data)
The Atmospheric Correction Inter-comparison eXercise (ACIX) is an international initiative with the aim to analyse the Surface Reflectance (SR) products of various state-of-the-art atmospheric correction (AC) processors. The Aerosol Optical Thickness (AOT) and Water Vapour (WV) are also examined in ACIX as additional outputs of AC processing. In this paper, the general ACIX framework is discussed; special mention is made of the motivation to initiate the experiment, the inter-comparison protocol, and the principal results. ACIX is free and open and every developer was welcome to participate. Eventually, 12 participants applied their approaches to various Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 image datasets acquired over sites around the world. The current results diverge depending on the sensors, products, and sites, indicating their strengths and weaknesses. Indeed, this first implementation of processor inter-comparison was proven to be a good lesson for the developers to learn the advantages and limitations of their approaches. Various algorithm improvements are expected, if not already implemented, and the enhanced performances are yet to be assessed in future ACIX experiments. View Full-Text
Keywords: remote sensing; atmospheric correction; processors inter-comparison; surface reflectance; aerosol optical thickness; water vapour; Sentinel-2; Landsat-8 remote sensing; atmospheric correction; processors inter-comparison; surface reflectance; aerosol optical thickness; water vapour; Sentinel-2; Landsat-8
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Doxani, G.; Vermote, E.; Roger, J.-C.; Gascon, F.; Adriaensen, S.; Frantz, D.; Hagolle, O.; Hollstein, A.; Kirches, G.; Li, F.; Louis, J.; Mangin, A.; Pahlevan, N.; Pflug, B.; Vanhellemont, Q. Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 352.

AMA Style

Doxani G, Vermote E, Roger J-C, Gascon F, Adriaensen S, Frantz D, Hagolle O, Hollstein A, Kirches G, Li F, Louis J, Mangin A, Pahlevan N, Pflug B, Vanhellemont Q. Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise. Remote Sensing. 2018; 10(2):352.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Doxani, Georgia, Eric Vermote, Jean-Claude Roger, Ferran Gascon, Stefan Adriaensen, David Frantz, Olivier Hagolle, André Hollstein, Grit Kirches, Fuqin Li, Jérôme Louis, Antoine Mangin, Nima Pahlevan, Bringfried Pflug, and Quinten Vanhellemont. 2018. "Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise" Remote Sensing 10, no. 2: 352.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop