Next Article in Journal
Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of IT for Corporate Sustainability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Attitudes toward Sustainability and Green Economy Issues Related to Some Students Learning Their Characteristics: A Preliminary Study
Open AccessArticle

A Peaking and Tailing Approach to Education and Curriculum Renewal for Sustainable Development

1
Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane 4001, Australia
2
Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2014, 6(7), 4181-4199; https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074181
Received: 24 March 2014 / Revised: 20 June 2014 / Accepted: 20 June 2014 / Published: 2 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Education and Skills for the Green Economy)
Contextual factors for sustainable development such as population growth, energy, and resource availability and consumption levels, food production yield, and growth in pollution, provide numerous complex and rapidly changing education and training requirements for a variety of professions including engineering. Furthermore, these requirements may not be clearly understood or expressed by designers, governments, professional bodies or the industry. Within this context, this paper focuses on one priority area for greening the economy through sustainable development—improving energy efficiency—and discusses the complexity of capacity building needs for professionals. The paper begins by acknowledging the historical evolution of sustainability considerations, and the complexity embedded in built environment solutions. The authors propose a dual-track approach to building capacity building, with a short-term focus on improvement (i.e., making peaking challenges a priority for postgraduate education), and a long-term focus on transformational innovation (i.e., making tailing challenges a priority for undergraduate education). A case study is provided, of Australian experiences over the last decade with regard to the topic area of energy efficiency. The authors conclude with reflections on implications for the approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development; capacity building; engineering education; built environment; energy efficiency; curriculum renewal sustainable development; capacity building; engineering education; built environment; energy efficiency; curriculum renewal
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Desha, C.; Hargroves, K.'. A Peaking and Tailing Approach to Education and Curriculum Renewal for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2014, 6, 4181-4199.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop