Typology of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: A Context of Sustainability and Digitalization
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Sustainable Consumption in the Pharmaceutical Market
2.2. Digitalization of Consumer Behavior in the Pharmaceutical Market
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Stages Sequence and Key Procedures
3.2. Methods
3.2.1. Data Collection
3.2.2. Validation of Value Dimensions
3.2.3. Consumer Typology
3.3. Research Sample
3.3.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Research Sample
3.3.2. Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Research Sample
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Characterization of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: Perspectives on Sustainability and Digitalization
4.1.1. Sustainable Consumption in the Pharmaceutical Market
4.1.2. Digitalization of Consumer Behavior in the Pharmaceutical Market
4.1.3. Validation of Value Dimensions
4.2. Consumer Typology in the Pharmaceutical Market: Perspectives on Sustainability and Digitalization
4.2.1. Consumer Typology in the Pharmaceutical Market
4.2.2. Sustainable-Active
4.2.3. Digital-Adept
4.2.4. Sustainable-Digital-Uninterested
4.2.5. Sustainable-Digital-Addicted
5. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Correction Statement
Appendix A
| Variables | Answers |
|---|---|
| Female |
| Male | |
| Other | |
| Under 25 years |
| 25–34 years | |
| 35–44 years | |
| 45–54 years | |
| 55–64 years | |
| 65–74 years | |
| 75 years and over | |
| 1 person |
| 2 people | |
| 3 people | |
| 4 or more people | |
| 1 person |
| 2 people | |
| 3 people | |
| 4 or more people | |
| None | |
| 1 person |
| 2 people | |
| 3 people | |
| 4 or more people | |
| None | |
| Village |
| City up to 20,000 inhabitants | |
| City from 20,000 to 100,000 inhabitants | |
| City from 100,000 to 500,000 inhabitants | |
| City over 500,000 inhabitants |
| Variables | Answers |
|---|---|
| Primary |
| Lower secondary | |
| Vocational | |
| Secondary | |
| Higher | |
| Manual worker |
| Sales representative | |
| White-collar worker (office) | |
| Teacher | |
| Middle management | |
| Manager | |
| Self-employed | |
| Freelance (e.g, doctor, artist, lawyer) | |
| Retiree/pensioner | |
| Student | |
| Other | |
| Very good |
| Good | |
| Average | |
| Poor | |
| Very poor |
| Never | Rarely | Somewhat Rarely | Neither Frequently nor Rarely | Somewhat Frequently | Frequently | Always/Constantly | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Answers | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Completely Disagree | Disagree | Somewhat Disagree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Somewhat Agree | Agree | Completely Agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Answers | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Completely Unlike Me | Unlike Me | Slightly Like Me | Hard to Say | Somewhat Like Me | Like Me | Very Much Like Me | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Values | Answers | ||||||
| HED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| HED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| ACH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| ACH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| POW | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| POW | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| UNI | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| UNI | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| BEN | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| BEN | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| BEN | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| SEC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| SEC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| CON | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| CON | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| TRA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| TRA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| STM | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| STM | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| S-DIR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| S-DIR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
References
- Bywalec, C. Konsumpcja w Teorii i Praktyce Gospodarowania; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2007; ISBN 978-83-01-15300-7. [Google Scholar]
- Mróz, B. Konsument w Globalnej Gospodarce. Trzy Perspektywy; Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie: Warsaw, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Howell, R.A. It’s Not (Just) “the Environment, Stupid!” Value, Motivations, and Routes to Engagement of People Adopting Lower-Carbon Lifestyles. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzoni, F. Circular Economy and Eco-Innovation in Italian Industrial Clusters. Best Practices from Prato Textile Cluster. Insights Into Reg. Dev. 2020, 2, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zou, L.W.; Chan, R.Y.K. Why and When Do Consumers Perform Green Behaviors? An Examination of Regulatory Focus and Ethical Ideology. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 94, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viu-Roig, M.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J. The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzelecki, A.; Kolny, B.; Kucia, M. Smart Homes as Catalysts for Sustainable Consumption: A Digital Economy Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajdzik, B.; Bartuś, K.; Jaciow, M.; Wolniak, R.; Wolny, R.; Grebski, W.W. Evolution of Polish E-Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Purchasing Behavior over Ten Years. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turek, A.; Owczarek, A. Consumption and Consumer Behavior in the European Healthcare Market. In Healthcare: Market Dynamics, Policies and Strategies in Europe; Glowik, M., Smyczek, S., Eds.; De Gruyter Oldenbourg: Berlin/Munich, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turek, A.; Owczarek, A. Determinants of Consumption Behavior of Over-the-Counter Medications—the Case of Painkillers and Anti-Inflammatory Medications. J. Econ. Manag. 2014, 15, 25–59. [Google Scholar]
- Kevrekidis, D.P.; Mináriková, D.; Markos, A. Effects of Demographic Characteristics and Consumer Behavior in the Selection of Retail Pharmacies and Over-the-Counter Medicine. Eur. Pharm. J. 2021, 68, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Basic Documents: Forty-Ninth Edition (Including Amendments Adopted up to 31 May 2019); WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-92-4-000051-3. [Google Scholar]
- Kickbusch, I. The Contribution of the World Health Organization to a New Public Health and Health Promotion. Am. J. Public Health 2003, 93, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phelan, J.C.; Link, B.G.; Tehranifar, P. Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2010, 51, S28–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, M.C. Pharmaceutical Marketing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1991; ISBN 9780429092442. [Google Scholar]
- Pham, M.T. The Seven Sins of Consumer Psychology. J. Consum. Psychol. 2013, 23, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lysonski, S.; Durvasula, S. Consumer Decision Making Styles in Retailing: Evolution of Mindsets and Psychological Impacts. J. Consum. Mark. 2013, 30, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achar, C.; So, J.; Agrawal, N.; Duhachek, A. What We Feel and Why We Buy: The Influence of Emotions on Consumer Decision-Making. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 10, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 25, 1–65. [Google Scholar]
- Grunert, S.C.; Juhl, H.J. Values, Environmental Attitudes, and Buying of Organic Food. J. Econ. Psychol. 1995, 16, 39–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J.; Ölander, F. Spillover of Environment-Friendly Consumer Behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenhaut, S.; Van Kenhove, P. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships among a Consumer’s Personal Values, Ethical Ideology and Ethical Beliefs. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 64, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleveland, M.; Kalamas, M.; Laroche, M. “It’s Not Easy Being Green”: Exploring Green Creeds, Green Deeds, and Internal Environmental Locus of Control. Psychol. Mark 2012, 29, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavelle, M.J.; Rau, H.; Fahy, F. Different Shades of Green? Unpacking Habitual and Occasional pro-Environmental Behavior. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 35, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zrałek, J. Konsument Wobec Wyzwań Zrównoważonej Konsumpcji; Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach: Katowice, Poland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Di Giulio, A.; Fischer, D.; Schäfer, M.; Blättel-Mink, B. Conceptualizing Sustainable Consumption: Toward an Integrative Framework. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2014, 10, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, M.R. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being; Pearson: London, UK, 2020; ISBN 0135225698. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, P.C. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerin, D.; Crete, J.; Mercier, J. A Multilevel Analysis of the Determinants of Recycling Behavior in the European Countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 2001, 30, 195–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidique, S.F.; Lupi, F.; Joshi, S.V. The Effects of Behavior and Attitudes on Drop-off Recycling Activities. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 54, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraj, E.; Martinez, E. Environmental Values and Lifestyles as Determining Factors of Ecological Consumer Behaviour: An Empirical Analysis. J. Consum. Mark. 2006, 23, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M.A.; Murray, D.L. Ethical Consumption, Values Convergence/Divergence and Community Development. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2013, 26, 351–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobsen, E.; Dulsrud, A. Will Consumers Save The World? The Framing of Political Consumerism. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2007, 20, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyer, R.; Muncy, J.A. Purpose and Object of Anti-Consumption. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, P.W.; Oskamp, S. Effort as a Moderator of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: General Environmental Concern and Recycling. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1996, 59, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogler, S.; de Rooij, R.H.P.F. Medication Wasted—Contents and Costs of Medicines Ending up in Household Garbage. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2018, 14, 1140–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raju, G.; Sarkar, P.; Singla, E.; Singh, H.; Sharma, R.K. Comparison of Environmental Sustainability of Pharmaceutical Packaging. Perspect. Sci. 2016, 8, 683–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmenperä, H.; Kauppi, S.; Dahlbo, H.; Fjäder, P. Increasing the Circularity of Packaging along Pharmaceuticals Value Chain. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kümmerer, K. The Presence of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Due to Human Use—Present Knowledge and Future Challenges. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2354–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Souza, H.O.; dos Costa, R.S.; Quadra, G.R.; dos Fernandez, M.A.S. Pharmaceutical Pollution and Sustainable Development Goals: Going the Right Way? Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 21, 100428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kümmerer, K.; Hempel, M. (Eds.) Green and Sustainable Pharmacy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-05198-2. [Google Scholar]
- Baron, M. Towards a Greener Pharmacy by More Eco Design. Waste Biomass Valorization 2012, 3, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peake, B.M.; Braund, R.; Tong, A.Y.C.; Tremblay, L.A. Green Chemistry, Green Pharmacy, and Life-Cycle Assessments. In The Life-Cycle of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 229–242. [Google Scholar]
- Bywalec, C. Konsumpcja a Rozwój Gospodarczy i Społeczny; Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck: Warsaw, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Sobocińska, M. Badania Marketingowe w Dobie Wirtualizacji Życia Społecznego. Nauk. o Zarządzaniu. Manag. Sci. 2012, 11, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
- Gregor, B.; Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D. Homo Cyber Oeconomicus—Nowy Wymiar Zachowań Konsumenckich. In Marketing w Erze Technologii Cyfrowych. Nowoczesne Koncepcje i Wyzwania; Gregor, B., Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D., Eds.; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wetsch, L.R. The “New” Virtual Consumer: Exploring the Experiences of New Users. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 2008, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazurek, G. E-Marketing. Planowanie. Narzędzia. Praktyka; Mazurek, G., Ed.; Poltext: Warsaw, Poland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- de Clippele, F. Legal Aspects of On-Line Pharmacy. Acta Chir. Belg. 2004, 104, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montoya, I.D.; Jano, E. Online Pharmacies: Safety and Regulatory Considerations. Int. J. Health Serv. 2007, 37, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orizio, G.; Merla, A.; Schulz, P.J.; Gelatti, U. Quality of Online Pharmacies and Websites Selling Prescription Drugs: A Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011, 13, e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.C. An Overview of Herb and Dietary Supplement Efficacy, Safety and Government Regulations in the United States with Suggested Improvements. Part 1 of 5 Series. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 107, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, C.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Dietary Supplements: Foods, Medicines, or Both? A Controversial Designation with Unspecific Legislation. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 2722–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bailey, R.L.; Gahche, J.J.; Lentino, C.V.; Dwyer, J.T.; Engel, J.S.; Thomas, P.R.; Betz, J.M.; Sempos, C.T.; Picciano, M.F. Dietary Supplement Use in the United States, 2003–2006. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fittler, A.; Ambrus, T.; Serefko, A.; Smejkalová, L.; Kijewska, A.; Szopa, A.; Káplár, M. Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Online Pharmacies in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Pandemic: At the Tipping Point towards the New Normal. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jairoun, A.A.; Al-Hemyari, S.S.; Abdulla, N.M.; El-Dahiyat, F.; Jairoun, M.; AL-Tamimi, S.K.; Babar, Z.U.D. Online Medication Purchasing during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Potential Risks to Patient Safety and the Urgent Need to Develop More Rigorous Controls for Purchasing Online Medications, a Pilot Study from the United Arab Emirates. J. Pharm. Policy Pract. 2021, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaroń, K.; Jastrzębska, A.; Mąkosza, K.; Grajek, M.; Krupa-Kotara, K.; Kobza, J. Availability of Medical Services and Teleconsultation during COVID-19 Pandemic in the Opinion of Patients of Hematology Clinics—A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study (Silesia, Poland). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baudier, P.; Kondrateva, G.; Ammi, C.; Chang, V.; Schiavone, F. Patients’ Perceptions of Teleconsultation During COVID-19: A Cross-national Study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 163, 120510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sztemberg-Lewandowska, M. Analiza Czynnikowa w Badaniach Marketingowych; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego: Wrocław, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Rószkiewicz, M. Zastosowanie Narzędzi Statystycznych w Strategii Pozycjonowania, 3rd–13th ed.; Uniwersytet Warszawski: Warsaw, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser, H.F. The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górniak, J. Analiza Czynnikowa i Analiza Głównych Składowych. ASK 1998, 7, 83–102. [Google Scholar]
- Leisch, F. A Toolbox for Centroids Cluster Analysis. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2006, 51, 526–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolnicar, S.; Grün, B.; Leisch, F. Step 5: Extracting Segments. In Market Segmentation Analysis. Management for Professionals; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 75–181. [Google Scholar]
- Convery, F.; McDonnell, S.; Ferreira, S. The Most Popular Tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish Plastic Bags Levy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2007, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinho, G.; Balaia, N.; Pires, A. The Portuguese Plastic Carrier Bag Tax: The Effects on Consumers’ Behavior. Waste Manag. 2017, 61, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, T.D.; Holmberg, K.; Stripple, J. Need a Bag? A Review of Public Policies on Plastic Carrier Bags—Where, How and to What Effect? Waste Manag. 2019, 87, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ehrhart, A.L.; Granek, E.F.; Nielsen-Pincus, M.; Horn, D.A. Leftover Drug Disposal: Customer Behavior, Pharmacist Recommendations, and Obstacles to Drug Take-Back Box Implementation. Waste Manag. 2020, 118, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vatovec, C.; Van Wagoner, E.; Evans, C. Investigating Sources of Pharmaceutical Pollution: Survey of over-the-Counter and Prescription Medication Purchasing, Use, and Disposal Practices among University Students. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 198, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogowska, J.; Zimmermann, A.; Muszyńska, A.; Ratajczyk, W.; Wolska, L. Pharmaceutical Household Waste Practices: Preliminary Findings from a Case Study in Poland. Environ. Manag. 2019, 64, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fittler, A.; Vida, R.G.; Káplár, M.; Botz, L. Consumers Turning to the Internet Pharmacy Market: Cross-Sectional Study on the Frequency and Attitudes of Hungarian Patients Purchasing Medications Online. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018, 20, e11115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, P.-P.; Braunack-Mayer, A. Perspectives on Privacy in the Pharmacy: The Views of Opioid Substitution Treatment Clients. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2019, 15, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrich, B.; Thalmair, A. Online Social Networks—Neuer Vertriebskanal Zur Kundenindividuellen Ansprache Für Finanzdienstleister? BIT Bank Inf. Technol. 2013, 14, 49–63. [Google Scholar]
- Rozkrut, D. Statistics Poland. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland; Statistical Publishing Establishment: Warsaw, Poland, 2024; ISBN 1506-0632. [Google Scholar]
- Kevrekidis, D.P.; Minarikova, D.; Markos, A.; Malovecka, I.; Minarik, P. Community Pharmacy Customer Segmentation Based on Factors Influencing Their Selection of Pharmacy and Over-the-Counter Medicines. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewandowska, A.; Witczak, J.; Giungato, P.; Dierks, C.; Kurczewski, P.; Pawlak-Lemanska, K. Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadan, Z.; Farah, M.; Abosag, I.; Sleiman, A. Typology of E-Commerce Shoppers: The Case of COVID-19. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2023, 26, 345–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dusoruth, V.; Peterson, H.H. Food Waste Tendencies: Behavioral Response to Cosmetic Deterioration of Food. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spada, A.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. The Influence of Shelf Life on Food Waste: A Model-Based Approach by Empirical Market Evidence. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3410–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liegeard, J.; Manning, L. Use of Intelligent Applications to Reduce Household Food Waste. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gu, Z.J.; Yang, S. Quantity-Discount-Dependent Consumer Preferences and Competitive Nonlinear Pricing. J. Mark. Res. 2010, 47, 1100–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koenigsberg, O.; Kohli, R.; Montoya, R. Package Size Decisions. Manag. Sci. 2010, 56, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EUR-Lex. Communication on the Challenges on Commodity Markets and on Raw Materials. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52011DC0025 (accessed on 25 July 2025).
- EUR-Lex. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions No. COM(2011) 571). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52011DC0571 (accessed on 25 July 2025).
- EUR-Lex. Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Eco-Nomic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions No. COM(2015) 614/2). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015DC0614 (accessed on 25 July 2025).
- Choden, K.; Bagchi, K.K.; Udo, G.J.; Kirs, P.J. The Influence of Individual Values on Internet Use: A Multinational Study. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 46, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, P.C.; Kalof, L.; Dietz, T.; Guagnano, G.A. Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 25, 1611–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karp, D.G. Values and Their Effect on Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environ. Behav. 1996, 28, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, P.W.; Zelezny, L.C. Values and Proenvironmental Behavior. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1998, 29, 540–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordlund, A.M.; Garvill, J. Effects of Values, Problem Awareness, and Personal Norm on Willingness to Reduce Personal Car Use. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, J.I.M.; Steg, L. Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries. J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 2007, 38, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corraliza, J.A.; Berenguer, J. Environmental Values, Beliefs, and Actions. Environ. Behav. 2000, 32, 832–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietz, T.; Fitzgerald, A.; Shwom, R. Environmental Values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 335–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balińska, A.; Jaska, E.; Werenowska, A. The Role of Eco-Apps in Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behavior of Young People Studying in Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaciow, M.; Wolny, R. New Technologies in the Ecological Behavior of Generation Z. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 4780–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stępień, S.; Czyżewski, B.; Sapa, A.; Borychowski, M.; Poczta, W.; Poczta-Wajda, A. Eco-Efficiency of Small-Scale Farming in Poland and Its Institutional Drivers. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz-Gerro, T.; Greenspan, I.; Handy, F.; Lee, H.-Y. The Relationship between Value Types and Environmental Behaviour in Four Countries: Universalism, Benevolence, Conformity and Biospheric Values Revisited. Environ. Values 2017, 26, 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H.; Cieciuch, J.; Vecchione, M.; Davidov, E.; Fischer, R.; Beierlein, C.; Ramos, A.; Verkasalo, M.; Lönnqvist, J.-E.; Demirutku, K.; et al. Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 103, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawroński, M.; Marciniak, M.; Zawadzka, M.; Malinowska, A.; Falkiewicz, B.; Wodecki, P.; Kumkowska, P.; Kaczyński, T.; Her, I. E-Commerce na Rynku Farmaceutycznym; IQVIA: Warsaw, Poland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Limbu, Y.B.; Huhmann, B.A. What Influences Consumers’ Online Medication Purchase Intentions and Behavior? A Scoping Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1356059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarpi, D. Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online. J. Interact. Mark. 2012, 26, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gammack, J.; Hodkinson, C. Virtual Reality, Involvement and the Consumer Interface. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2003, 15, 78–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.J.; Minor, M.S.; Wei, J. Aesthetics and the Online Shopping Environment: Understanding Consumer Responses. J. Retail. 2011, 87, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Variables | Category | Count | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 635 | 50.9 |
| Male | 612 | 49.1 | |
| Other | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Age | Under 25 years | 156 | 12.5 |
| 25–34 years | 223 | 17.9 | |
| 35–44 years | 303 | 24.3 | |
| 45–54 years | 206 | 20.9 | |
| 55–64 years | 163 | 13.1 | |
| 65–74 years | 142 | 11.4 | |
| 75 years and over | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Household size | 1 person | 177 | 14.2 |
| 2 people | 355 | 28.5 | |
| 3 people | 350 | 28.0 | |
| 4 or more people | 365 | 29.3 | |
|
Number of people under 18 in the household | 1 person | 327 | 26.2 |
| 2 people | 188 | 15.1 | |
| 3 people | 48 | 3.8 | |
| 4 or more people | 18 | 1.5 | |
| None | 666 | 53.4 | |
|
Number of people over 65 in the household | 1 person | 174 | 14.0 |
| 2 people | 109 | 8.7 | |
| 3 people | 10 | 0.8 | |
| 4 or more people | 18 | 1.4 | |
| None | 936 | 75.1 | |
| Place of residence | Village | 461 | 37.0 |
| City up to 20,000 inhabitants | 152 | 12.2 | |
| City from 20,000 to 100,000 inhabitants | 236 | 18.9 | |
| City from 100,000 to 500,000 inhabitants | 322 | 25.8 | |
| City over 500,000 inhabitants | 76 | 6.1 |
| Variables | Category | Count | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Primary | 27 | 2.2 |
| Lower secondary | 14 | 1.1 | |
| Vocational | 169 | 13.6 | |
| Secondary | 474 | 38.0 | |
| Higher | 563 | 54.1 | |
| Occupation | Manual worker | 207 | 16.6 |
| Sales representative | 50 | 4.0 | |
| White-collar worker (office) | 293 | 23.5 | |
| Teacher | 68 | 5.5 | |
| Middle management | 73 | 5.9 | |
| Manager | 68 | 5.5 | |
| Self-employed | 118 | 9.5 | |
| Freelance (e.g., doctor, artist, lawyer) | 79 | 6.3 | |
| Retiree/pensioner | 183 | 14.7 | |
| Student | 98 | 7.9 | |
| Other | 10 | 0.8 | |
|
Rating of the economic situation of the household | Very good | 134 | 10.7 |
| Good | 585 | 46.9 | |
| Average | 457 | 36.6 | |
| Poor | 52 | 4.2 | |
| Very poor | 19 | 1.5 |
| Determinants | F 1 | F 2 | F 3 | F 4 | F 5 | F 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Having a good time is important to me. I don’t like to deny myself anything | 0.62 | |||||
| It is important to me to do things that bring me pleasure. I look for opportunities to have fun | 0.65 | |||||
| It is important to me to showcase my abilities and talents. I want people to admire what I do | 0.76 | |||||
| It is important to me to achieve significant success. I hope that people will appreciate my accomplishments | 0.75 | |||||
| It is important to me to be wealthy. I want to have a lot of money and various expensive possessions | 0.72 | |||||
| It is important to me to have influence over others. I want people to do what I tell them | 0.71 | |||||
| I believe it is important for all people in the world to be treated equally. I am convinced that everyone should have equal opportunities in life | 0.61 | |||||
| It is important to me to listen to people who are different from me. Even when I disagree with them, I still want to understand their perspective | 0.72 | |||||
| Caring for the natural environment is important to me. I am deeply convinced that people should take care of nature | 0.69 | |||||
| It is very important to me to help the people around me. I want to care for their well-being | 0.73 | |||||
| It is important to me to live in a safe environment. I avoid anything that could threaten my safety | 0.58 | |||||
| It is important to me that the state provides protection against all threats. I want the state to be strong so it can defend its citizens | 0.55 | |||||
| It is important to me to always behave properly. I want to avoid actions that people might consider inappropriate | 0.64 | |||||
| I believe that people should follow orders. I think that people should always adhere to rules and regulations, even when no one is watching what they do | 0.64 | |||||
| It is important to me to be modest and humble. I try not to attract attention to myself | 0.70 | |||||
| Tradition is important to me. I try to follow religious or family traditions | 0.53 | |||||
| I like surprises and I am always looking for new activities. I believe it is important to be involved in many different things in life | 0.64 | |||||
| I seek adventure and enjoy taking risks. I want to have a life full of excitement | 0.73 | |||||
| It is important to me to invent new things and take a creative approach. I like doing everything in my own original way | 0.71 |
| Indicators | F 1 | F 2 | F 3 | F 4 | F 5 | F 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS loading | 2.78 | 2.47 | 2.13 | 1.68 | 0.96 | 0.83 |
| Proportion variance | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Cumulative variance | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.57 |
| Proportion explained | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Cumulative proportion | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| Sustainable-Active (20%) | |
|---|---|
| Criteria of Typology | Features of Consumer Types |
Sustainability:
Digitalization:
| Social values: tradition and conformity; universalism and benevolence * Gender: women * Age: middle age group of 35–44 years Education: higher * Occupation: manual workers, retirees/pensioners, students Size of household: 3 people as well as 4 people and more Children in household: none Elderly people in household: none Economic situation: average * Where they live: rural areas |
| Type II—Digital-Adept (29%) | |
|---|---|
| Criteria of Typology | Features of Consumer Types |
Sustainability:
Digitalization:
| Social values: hedonism *
Gender: men * Age: below 34 years Education: secondary and higher Occupation: manual workers, middle and higher managers Size of household: 2–3 people Children in household: none Elderly people in household: none Economic situation: very good and good * Where they live: rural areas |
| Type III—Sustainable-Digital-Uninterested (21%) | |
|---|---|
| Criteria of Typology | Features of Consumer Types |
Sustainability:
Digitalization:
| Social values: security *
Gender: women and men Age: above 45 years Education: secondary and higher Occupation: white-collar workers and retailers/pensioners Size of household: 4 people and more Children in household: 1 or 2 Elderly people in household: none or 2 Economic situation: average * Where they live: cities between 20 and 500 thousand inhabitants |
| Type IV—Sustainable-Digital-Addicted (29%) | |
|---|---|
| Criteria of Typology | Features of Consumer Types |
Sustainability:
Digitalization:
| Social values: power and achievement, stimulation and self-direction *
Gender: women and men * Age: average age between 35 and 44 * Education: higher * Occupation: white-collar workers and the self-employed Size of household: 2 people Children in household: none Elderly people in household: none Economic situation: good * Where they live: bigger cities, above 100,000 inhabitants |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Turek, A.; Smyczek, S.; Rech, J. Typology of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: A Context of Sustainability and Digitalization. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021065
Turek A, Smyczek S, Rech J. Typology of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: A Context of Sustainability and Digitalization. Sustainability. 2026; 18(2):1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021065
Chicago/Turabian StyleTurek, Artur, Sławomir Smyczek, and Jakub Rech. 2026. "Typology of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: A Context of Sustainability and Digitalization" Sustainability 18, no. 2: 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021065
APA StyleTurek, A., Smyczek, S., & Rech, J. (2026). Typology of Consumers in the Pharmaceutical Market: A Context of Sustainability and Digitalization. Sustainability, 18(2), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021065

