Abstract
Landslides rank among the most frequent and devastating natural hazards globally, causing significant loss of life and property. As a result, landslide susceptibility assessment has become a central focus in geohazard research, which is devoted to preventing and alleviating the frequent occurrence of landslides. Numerous analytical models have been applied to evaluate landslide susceptibility, including Frequency Ratio (FR), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and various hybrid and neural network-based approaches. This review synthesizes current progress in integrating Nature-based Solutions (NBS) with modeling and policy frameworks, highlighting their potential to provide cost-effective, sustainable, and adaptive alternatives to conventional landslide mitigation strategies. Based on a systematic review of 127 peer-reviewed publications published between 2023 and 2025, selected from Web of Science, ScienceDirect, MDPI, Springer, and Google Scholar using predefined keywords and screening criteria, this study reveals that the most frequently used conditioning factors in landslide susceptibility modeling are slope (96 times), aspect (77 times), elevation (77 times), and lithology (77 times). Among modeling approaches, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), hybrid models, and neural network models consistently demonstrate high predictive performance. Despite the expanding body of literature on NBS, only 2.3% of all NBS-related studies specifically address landslide mitigation. The existing literature primarily concentrates on assessing the biophysical effectiveness of interventions such as vegetation cover, root reinforcement, and forest-based stabilization using a range of predictive modeling techniques. However, significant gaps remain in the integration of economic valuation frameworks, particularly cost–benefit analysis (CBA), to quantify the monetary value of NBS interventions in landslide risk reduction. This highlights a critical area for future research to support evidence-based decision-making and sustainable risk governance.