Next Article in Journal
Level of Integration of Real and Digital Economies: Effects and Mechanisms of Environmental Pollution Impacts
Next Article in Special Issue
The Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influence Mechanisms of Intercity Cooperation Networks from the Perspective of Sustainable Regional Development: A Case Study of the Pearl River–Xijiang Economic Belt, China
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Green Perceived Value Through Green New Products on Purchase Intention: Brand Attitudes, Brand Trust, and Digital Customer Engagement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Land-Use Transfer and Its Ecological Effects in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study of Nanjing, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Implications for Policy in South Korean Seafood Education via the Lens of the Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETS) Model

1
Division of Marine & Fisheries Business and Economics, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
2
Division of Global & Interdisciplinary Studies, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(9), 4103; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094103
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 21 April 2025 / Accepted: 29 April 2025 / Published: 1 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation and Sustainability in Urban Planning and Governance)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of integrating the Social, Ecological, Technological Systems (SETS) keyword coding—which categorizes sustainability themes into social, ecological, and technological dimensions—into seafood consumption education programs. In this study, the SETS framework is utilized to conduct an analysis of the educational environment around the consumption of seafood in South Korea. Through the utilization of focus group interviews with industry professionals, the research reveals that the current educational framework on the consumption of seafood and dietary education has a substantial gap in its coverage. The study indicates a predominant focus on the social aspects (56.46%) of seafood consumption education among stakeholders, succeeded by the technological (28.26%) and ecological dimensions (15.28%). To enhance seafood dietary education, the study proposes two primary avenues: developing comprehensive seafood dietary education programs for diverse age demographics and establishing a training system for specialized professionals in seafood dietary education. Future research should refine the SETS approach and explore its broader application across food systems to further promote sustainable consumption.
Keywords: seafood consumption; dietary education; social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) framework; focus group interviews; policy recommendations seafood consumption; dietary education; social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) framework; focus group interviews; policy recommendations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.-D.; Hong, C.-Y. Implications for Policy in South Korean Seafood Education via the Lens of the Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETS) Model. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094103

AMA Style

Lee H-D, Hong C-Y. Implications for Policy in South Korean Seafood Education via the Lens of the Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETS) Model. Sustainability. 2025; 17(9):4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Heon-Dong, and Chang-Yu Hong. 2025. "Implications for Policy in South Korean Seafood Education via the Lens of the Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETS) Model" Sustainability 17, no. 9: 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094103

APA Style

Lee, H.-D., & Hong, C.-Y. (2025). Implications for Policy in South Korean Seafood Education via the Lens of the Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETS) Model. Sustainability, 17(9), 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop