Next Article in Journal
Dual-Borehole Sc-CO2 Thermal Shock Fracturing: Thermo-Hydromechanical Coupling Under In Situ Stress Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Embodied Multisensory Gastronomy and Sustainable Destination Appeal: A Grounded Theory Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Conservation Fencing for Coastal Wetland Restoration: Technical Requirements and Financial Viability as a Nature-Based Climate Solution

1
River Consulting Pty Ltd., Nietta, TAS 7315, Australia
2
Burwood Campus, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7295; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167295
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Revised: 4 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 12 August 2025

Abstract

This paper investigates whether carbon payments are sufficient to entice private landholders to invest in the rehabilitation and protection of coastal wetlands as a nature-based climate solution. Ecologically intact coastal wetlands, such as mangroves and saltmarshes, are capable of sequestering and storing large amounts of carbon. Reinstating ecological functionality of degraded coastal wetlands may be achieved by installing conservation fences that exclude hard-hoofed domestic and feral animals. This research integrates ecological, technical and economic data to ascertain whether conservation fencing could represent a financially viable investment for coastal landholders in the Australian context, if restored wetlands attracted carbon payments. Data gleaned through literature review and expert interviews about technical fencing requirements, contemporary costs and potential blue carbon income are consolidated into scenarios and tested using cost–benefit analysis. Payback periods are calculated using deterministic parameters. Risk-based cost–benefit analysis accounts for uncertainty of ecological and price parameters; it provides probability distributions of benefit–cost ratios assuming an expert-agreed economic lifespan of conservation fences. The results demonstrate that the payback period and benefit–cost ratio are highly sensitive to wetlands’ carbon sequestration capacity, fencing costs and the carbon price going forward. In general, carbon payments on their own are likely insufficient to entice private landholders to protect coastal wetlands through conservation fencing, except in circumstances where restored wetlands achieve high additional carbon sequestration rates. Policy measures that reduce up-front costs and risk and remuneration of multiple ecosystem services provided by restored wetlands are required to upscale blue carbon solutions using conservation fencing. The research findings bear relevance for other conservation and land-use contexts that use fencing to achieve sustainability goals and generate payments for ecosystem services.
Keywords: blue carbon; wetland restoration; conservation fencing; ungulate exclusion; cost–benefit analysis blue carbon; wetland restoration; conservation fencing; ungulate exclusion; cost–benefit analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Greiner, R. Conservation Fencing for Coastal Wetland Restoration: Technical Requirements and Financial Viability as a Nature-Based Climate Solution. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167295

AMA Style

Greiner R. Conservation Fencing for Coastal Wetland Restoration: Technical Requirements and Financial Viability as a Nature-Based Climate Solution. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Greiner, Romy. 2025. "Conservation Fencing for Coastal Wetland Restoration: Technical Requirements and Financial Viability as a Nature-Based Climate Solution" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167295

APA Style

Greiner, R. (2025). Conservation Fencing for Coastal Wetland Restoration: Technical Requirements and Financial Viability as a Nature-Based Climate Solution. Sustainability, 17(16), 7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop