Next Article in Journal
Provincial-Level Carbon-Reduction Potential for Agricultural Irrigation in China
Previous Article in Journal
Ripple Effects of Climate Policy Uncertainty: Risk Spillovers Between Traditional Energy and Green Financial Markets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study

by
Muzeyyen Burcu Hidimoglu
1,*,
Ahmet Feyzioglu
1,
Huseyin Haliloglu
1 and
Akın Emrecan Gok
2
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Türkiye
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Istanbul, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5499; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125499 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 9 June 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 14 June 2025

Abstract

Sustainability is a key focus for the machinery manufacturing industry, aiming to align innovation with environmental and economic goals. This research proposes an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based framework to evaluate and rank sustainability-focused innovation criteria. The model was validated using 54,054 projects from CORDIS and TÜBİTAK and a survey of 46 experts from academia, industry, and the public sector. According to AHP results, Economic Criteria ranked highest (46%), followed by Product-Related Environmental (18%), Market (16%), Process-Related Environmental (13%), and Social Criteria (7%). Product Cost (45%), Elimination of Hazardous Substances (30%), and Occupational Health and Safety (29%) ranked highest among sub-criteria, reflecting the dominance of financial and regulatory priorities. Social and process-related criteria were less prioritized unless linked to regulatory compliance. The framework provides a practical tool for innovation leaders and policymakers aiming to embed sustainability in strategic planning. It aligns with global initiatives like the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal, contributing to both theory and practice in industrial sustainability.
Keywords: sustainability; innovation; machinery manufacturing; multi-criteria decision-making; Analytic Hierarchy Process; AHP; roadmap development; strategic planning sustainability; innovation; machinery manufacturing; multi-criteria decision-making; Analytic Hierarchy Process; AHP; roadmap development; strategic planning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hidimoglu, M.B.; Feyzioglu, A.; Haliloglu, H.; Gok, A.E. Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125499

AMA Style

Hidimoglu MB, Feyzioglu A, Haliloglu H, Gok AE. Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study. Sustainability. 2025; 17(12):5499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hidimoglu, Muzeyyen Burcu, Ahmet Feyzioglu, Huseyin Haliloglu, and Akın Emrecan Gok. 2025. "Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study" Sustainability 17, no. 12: 5499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125499

APA Style

Hidimoglu, M. B., Feyzioglu, A., Haliloglu, H., & Gok, A. E. (2025). Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study. Sustainability, 17(12), 5499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop