Next Article in Journal
Promoting Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Consumers’ Domain-Specific Environmental Knowledge and Personality Traits
Previous Article in Journal
Pro-Social Solutions in Residential Environments Created as a Result of Participatory Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Using Different Types of Compost on the Growth and Yield of Corn

by
Anita Zapałowska
1,* and
Wacław Jarecki
2
1
Department of Agriculture and Waste Management, Collegium of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, St. Ćwiklinskiej 1a, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Department of Crop Production, Collegium of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, St. Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020511
Submission received: 4 December 2023 / Revised: 17 December 2023 / Accepted: 2 January 2024 / Published: 7 January 2024

Abstract

:
The cultivation of corn holds immense importance as a foundational global grain crop, catering to human sustenance and serving as vital animal feed. Moreover, corn plays a substantial role in biofuel production. Additionally, cultivating corn can have a positive effect on crop rotation by improving soil quality and reducing erosion. In a pot trial using six distinct compost variations derived from different organic wastes as fertilizers for GS210 corn, specific indices, such as Fv/Fm (0.80, 0.80, 0.81), Fv/F0 (4.07, 3.99, 4.03), PI (4.62, 4.22, 5.21), and RC/ABS (1.71, 1.68, 2.01), exhibited the highest values. Interestingly, mineral fertilization with NPK displayed significant benefits on various growth parameters like plant height (188.9 cm), cob length (17.50 cm), grains per cob (324.0), and thousand-grain weight (MTZ) (285.2). The difference in the cob grain count between NPK mineral fertilization and the control reached 168.5 grains, which was statistically confirmed. Furthermore, the grain’s protein content notably increased with mineral fertilization (9.5) compared to the control (8.5). While organic fertilizers showed lower outcomes (9.1–9.3) than NPK mineral fertilization, they generally outperformed the control (8.5). This prompts the need for future studies to assess the effectiveness of individual organic fertilizers in combination with mineral nitrogen fertilization.

1. Introduction

Sustainable development refers to a method that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It involves finding a balance between economic growth, social progress, and environmental protection to ensure that resources are used efficiently and that the well-being of both current and future societies is upheld. In the realm of sustainable agriculture, the quest for innovative fertilizers has intensified. With traditional organic and mineral fertilizers witnessing a steady rise in costs, researchers and practitioners are seeking viable alternatives that not only nourish crops but also align with environmental consciousness. One of the primary drivers behind this shift is the escalating expense associated with conventional fertilizers. Organic fertilizers, derived from natural sources, and mineral fertilizers, which involve chemical compounds, have long been the mainstay. However, their production costs have steadily increased, exerting financial strain on farmers and prompting exploration into more cost-effective alternatives. Managing generated waste appropriately is a significant concern in the contemporary world. Organic waste, for instance, can be recycled and repurposed, such as its utilization as a fertilizer. Numerous organic wastes, particularly those originating from agriculture, the food industry, kitchens, and even municipal sources, harbor valuable nutrients that are beneficial for crops. Thus, in agriculture, an effective approach involves implementing a closed-loop system, enabling the recycling of nutrients from organic waste as an alternative fertilizer [1]. However, it is important to note that the widespread adoption of such solutions might not always be feasible or justified in every scenario [2]. According to the findings by Bhatti et al. [3] and Strenner et al. [4], alternative organic fertilizers such as biogas fermentation residue, well-aged farmyard manure, both fresh and matured organic waste, green compost at various stages, and microbial carbonized compost can be effectively utilized. Oluwa et al.’s findings [5] suggest that employing organic fertilizers not only benefits the immediate crop but also has positive effects on subsequent crops within the rotation. This aspect should be considered in future agricultural research endeavors. Instances of excessive mineral fertilizer application in agriculture have been documented, presenting economic inefficiency and environmental risks [6]. Consequently, numerous countries are advocating solutions to diminish mineral fertilizer usage, advocating for alternatives, such as organic substitutes derived from diverse sources [7,8]. Several researchers [9,10,11,12] advocate for the synergistic utilization of mineral and organic fertilizers as a viable approach to curtail reliance on the former. Leaving crop residues, particularly straw, within fields is considered sound agricultural practice [13,14]. Berry et al. [15] corroborated the significance of crop residues as valuable fertilizers, emphasizing that nutrient availability hinges on the mineralization rate. Additionally, their broad C:N ratio necessitates consideration of the nutrient balance. Converting diverse organic wastes into biofertilizers stands out as an effective remedy, mitigating their detrimental environmental effects and cutting down on the quantities of mineral fertilizers employed [16,17]. Elias et al. [18] strongly supported the creation of soil fertility maps before determining crop fertilization needs. They demonstrated that, in corn cultivation, this approach led to elevated yields and decreased fertilization expenses. Past studies [19,20,21,22] underscore the pivotal role of understanding the soil nutrient content in providing precise fertilizer recommendations for all crops. Zhang et al. [22] and Sądej and Żołnowski [23] concluded that optimal fertilization profoundly impacts soil fertility, directly influencing both yields and their quality. In response to this perspective, Sądej et al. [24] emphasized that the results of fertilization depend on the soil type. Ocwa et al. [25] argued that elevating the intensity of fertilization should not be viewed as the primary agricultural technique for boosting crop yields. Their findings indicate that achieving optimal corn grain yield necessitates optimizing all agrotechnical practices and carefully selecting suitable varieties tailored to specific local habitat conditions.
Mącik et al. [26] highlight the necessity to shift the focus towards organic fertilizers and biopreparations, attributing this shift to the adverse shifts within agroecosystems caused by excessive mineral fertilizer usage. These actions align with the principles of fostering sustainable agriculture, resonating with initiatives like the European Green Deal in the European Union. Additionally, Sarajuoghi et al. [27] demonstrated the efficacy of biofertilizers and microbiological preparations in corn fertilization, emphasizing the importance of their more frequent utilization. Mącik et al. [19] advocated for the value of biofertilizers and biopreparations, especially within the framework of regenerative agriculture. Liu et al. [28] affirmed the advantages of utilizing organic waste in agriculture as a fertilizer, particularly in terms of carbon dioxide sequestration. Additionally, Gao et al. [29] and Shi et al. [30] substantiated how employing organic fertilizers enables a reduction in mineral fertilizer doses while concurrently achieving high corn yields with commendable grain quality.
Duan et al. [31] indicated that corn responds well to manure fertilization, which is a response not observed in wheat cultivation. On the contrary, Murmu et al. [32] found mineral fertilizers to be more effective in corn experiments compared to organic ones. Nevertheless, organic fertilizers significantly enhance the soil by enriching it with microorganisms, organic carbon, macroelements, and microelements, leading to a favorable environment for succeeding plants. Taj et al. [33] supported the positive impact of organic fertilizers on soils’ physicochemical properties by increasing organic matter and improving the soil’s pH. However, they recommend a balanced approach, suggesting the use of a combined dose of organic and mineral NPK fertilizers in appropriate proportions for corn cultivation. Pang and Letey [9] suggested that crops like corn, which have a substantial nitrogen requirement, show favorable responses to a combination of organic and mineral fertilization. Specifically, during certain developmental stages where the nitrogen demand is notably high, the application of mineral fertilizer becomes justified. Ahmad et al. [16] demonstrated through both pot and field experiments that employing organic fertilization alongside half the standard dose of mineral nitrogen is as effective as using the full nitrogen fertilizer dose (175 kg·ha−1). This approach notably enhanced root mass, biomass, and, ultimately, corn grain yield.
Hu et al. [34] advocated for a combined approach to organic and mineral fertilization as a beneficial strategy for maize cultivation, recommending a ratio of 75% organic fertilizers to 25% mineral fertilizers. This blend aims to minimize greenhouse gas emissions while ensuring robust grain yields by bolstering soil fertility. Additionally, other scholars [35,36,37,38] underscore the importance of considering N2O and CH4 emissions when using organic fertilizers. Yao et al. [39] substantiated that leaving corn stalks in the field increased N2O emissions. Conversely, He et al. [40], in their evaluation of various fertilization methods, found that an organic fertilizer resulted in the highest N2O emissions when compared to chemical fertilization, chemical/organic combinations, and control groups without fertilization. Zhang et al. [22] highlighted that nitrogen losses were observed when fertilizers were applied either too early or too late in corn cultivation. Meanwhile, Asadu et al. [41] confirmed the efficacy of organic fertilizers derived from agricultural waste as a viable alternative to chemical fertilizers. Their study demonstrated the positive impact of bioorganic fertilizers on corn plant growth compared to the control group.
Sabourifard et al. [42] achieved the highest yield of corn seeds through the use of urea and vermicompost, whereas manure fertilization resulted in the highest content of oil and linolenic acid in the seeds. Numerous authors [43,44,45] advocate composting or vermicomposting, employing earthworms such as Eisenia fetida as the most effective means of managing organic waste. Patra et al. [43] investigated five distinct waste types—leaf litter (Tectona grandis), water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), cauliflower waste (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), coconut cores, and fungal waste—and found that vermicomposting demonstrated superior fertilizing properties compared to traditional composting. Maharjan et al. [46] and Rupani et al. [47] affirm the benefits of using earthworms in converting organic waste into vermicompost, although they note that this method may not always be universally efficient or applicable.
El-Hassanin et al. [48] and Rékási et al. [49] highlight limitations in using sewage sludge as a fertilizer due to the pathogenic microorganisms and heavy metals it contains, in line with international standards. However, they assert that with proper treatment and processing, sewage sludge can be transformed into a valuable and environmentally safe organic fertilizer. However, the implementation of sewage waste as a fertilizer is not without its considerations. Stringent guidelines and rigorous treatment processes are imperative to ensure the safety and efficacy of these fertilizers. Thorough treatment is crucial to eliminate pathogens and toxins, ensuring that the resulting product enhances crop growth without adverse effects on human health or the environment. The possibility of using sewage waste as a fertilizer presents a compelling opportunity to diversify and revolutionize agricultural practices. It is a prospect that not only offers a practical solution to rising fertilizer costs but also aligns with the global push toward sustainability and responsible resource management. Moreover, the shift towards sewage waste-derived fertilizers aligns with broader environmental goals.
Recycling waste into beneficial agricultural products reduces the strain on landfills and minimizes the environmental impact of waste disposal. It is a step towards a circular economy, where resources are repurposed, contributing to a more sustainable ecosystem. The transition from conventional fertilizers to sewage waste-derived alternatives is not an overnight transformation. It requires collaborative efforts among researchers, policymakers, waste management authorities, and farmers to establish protocols, conduct comprehensive studies, and facilitate adoption. The possibility of using sewage waste as a fertilizer presents a compelling opportunity to diversify and revolutionize agricultural practices. It is a prospect that not only offers a practical solution to rising fertilizer costs but also aligns with the global push toward sustainability and responsible resource management.
This study aimed to investigate how corn responds to fertilization using compost derived from different municipal waste sources compared to mineral fertilization NPK and a control group. The research hypothesis posited that organic fertilization could substitute NPK mineral fertilization without compromising the quantity and quality of grain yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

To evaluate the impact of compost fertilization, we utilized two control samples. The first control sample consisted of soil without any added fertilizer; the second control sample involved mineral fertilization.
The soil was slightly acidic (pH 1N KCl 6.1), the content of phosphorus and magnesium was average (P2O5 14.8 mg·kg−1 d.m., Mg 6.2 mg·kg−1 d.m.), and the potassium content was high (21.4 K2O mg·kg−1 d.m.). The content of microelements was average (Zn 10.7 mg·kg−1 d.m., Cu 5.22 mg·kg−1 d.m., Fe 2248 mg·kg−1 d.m., Mn 409 mg·kg−1 d.m.).
The second control sample involved mineral fertilization, using Polifoska®8 (8% N, 24% P2O5, 24% K2O) and Pulrea + INu (46% N). Calculated doses of NPK mineral fertilizers—100 kg·ha−1 N, 96 kg·ha−1 P2O5, and 96 kg·ha−1 K2O—were applied per pot before sowing. Additionally, a 50 kg·ha−1 N application occurred during the four-leaf phase, mirroring the common practice of NPK mineral fertilization in the research area.
Compost fertilization utilized the substrate generated in the experiment, as detailed by Zapałowska et al. [50]. The mentioned compost was prepared using different types of municipal waste in various mass proportions (kg by mass):
  • Compost 1: sewage sludge (165 kg) + sawdust (35 kg);
  • Compost 2: sewage sludge (90 kg) + sawdust (10 kg) + garden and park waste (100 kg);
  • Compost 3: garden and park waste (180 kg) + sawdust (20 kg);
  • Compost 4: sewage sludge (165 kg) + sawdust (35 kg) + earthworms;
  • Compost 5: sewage sludge (90 kg) + sawdust (10 kg) + garden and park waste (100 kg) + earthworms;
  • Compost 6: garden and park waste (180 kg) + sawdust (20 kg) + earthworms.
The municipal waste was distributed among six bioreactors, each with a thermally insulated plastic cube holding 1 m3. To aid the bioconversion process, mechanical mixing was necessary. Weekly checks tracked the moisture level of the composting organic material. Temperature readings highlighted four key stages in the composting process.
In our experiment, the setup was as follows:
  • A-Soil without any fertilizer;
  • B-Soil + Polifoska®8 + Pulrea + INu;
  • C-Soil + Compost 1: sewage sludge (165 kg) + sawdust (35 kg);
  • D-Soil + Compost 2: sewage sludge (90 kg) + sawdust (10 kg) + garden and park waste (100 kg);
  • E-Soil + Compost 3: garden and park waste (180 kg) + sawdust (20 kg);
  • F-Soil + Compost 4: sewage sludge (165 kg) + sawdust (35 kg) + earthworms;
  • G-Soil + Compost 5: sewage sludge (90 kg) + sawdust (10 kg) + garden and park waste (100 kg) + earthworms;
  • H-Soil + Compost 6: garden and park waste (180 kg) + sawdust (20 kg) + earthworms.
The trial was conducted with a single factor across four repetitions. The tested factor was organic fertilization (variants C, D, E, F, G, and H) compared to the control (A) and (B).

2.2. Chemical Analysies of Compost

The compost was subjected to chemical analysis in accordance with the methodologies specified in the publication by Zapałowska et al. [51]. The levels of microelements were measured using the absorption spectrometric method. The available phosphorus and potassium were estimated using the Egnér–Riehm method. The total organic carbon and nitrogen content was determined using the dry combustion method.

2.3. Seed Material

In the experiment, the seed of the GS210 corn variety (Agro Seed Sp. z o. o., Brzezie, Poland) was used. The seeds were initially treated with the following two active substances: metalaxyl and prothioconazole.

2.4. Experimental Design

The plastic pots employed had a capacity of 20 L and a 30 cm diameter. The soil chosen was Haplic Cambisol-Cmha [IUSS 2015], obtained from a field located at the Experimental Department of the University of Rzeszów in Krasne, near Rzeszów, Poland. The initial application of NPK mineral fertilizers before sowing was calculated at 100 kg·ha−1 of N, 96 kg·ha−1 of P2O5, and 96 kg·ha−1 of K2O per pot. Moreover, an extra 50 kg·ha−1 of N was administered during the four-leaf phase. This method corresponds with the conventional technique for NPK mineral fertilization in the research area. The doses of compost (C-H) per pot were calculated to provide 150 kg·ha−1 of nitrogen. The remaining elements were not equilibrated, assuming their contribution would enrich the soil’s fertility—a factor slated for assessment in upcoming experiments.
Corn seeds were planted on 5 April 2023, with three seeds per pot. Subsequently, these pots were placed within growth chambers (Model GC-300/1000; JEIO Tech Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) at a temperature of 20 ± 1 °C, with a relative humidity of 60 ± 3%. The photoperiod was maintained at 16/8 h (L/D), with a maximum light intensity of around 300 µmol m−2 s−1 during the day. The substrate moisture level was sustained at 60% of the field water capacity. Pot placements were randomly altered every 5 days. The stages of corn development were tracked following the BBCH scale (Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamtund CHemische Industrie) [52]. During the one-leaf phase (11 BBCH), one plant was retained per pot. Upon reaching the four-leaf stage (14 BBCH), the pots were relocated to a vegetation hall with natural light and a constant temperature of 20 ± 1 °C. Soil moisture was sustained at 60% of the field water capacity throughout this phase. The experiment persisted until full maturity (89 BBCH), at which point the plants were harvested, and biometric measurements, including plant height, cob length, the number of grains per cob, and thousand-grain weight (MTZ), were recorded. The plant’s growth and development phase spanned 178 days, measured from the day of sowing until the day of harvesting. Additionally, the total protein content in the harvested grain was assessed using the Kjeldahl method [53].

2.5. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were conducted using a handheld Pocket PEA instrument (Hansatech Instruments, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, UK). A black shading clip was affixed to the upper (apical) leaf of each plant during the fifth leaf stage (15 BBCH). After a 30 min interval, measurements were taken for the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (Fv/F0), and the photosynthetic efficiency index (PI).

2.6. Measurement of Gas Exchange

The LC pro-SD photosynthesis measurement system (ADC Bioscientific Ltd., Herts, UK) was used for the measurements. The net photosynthetic rate (PN, mmol (CO2) m−2∙s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2∙s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2∙s−1), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, mol CO2 m−2∙s−1) were measured on four fully expanded leaves in every pot. The flow accuracy of the LCpro-SD plant leaf photosynthesis measurement chamber was ±2% of its range. During the measurement, the light intensity was 300 µmol∙m−2∙s−1, and the temperature in the measurement chamber was 21 °C.

2.7. Soil Plant Analysis Development

The relative chlorophyll content was measured using a Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and expressed in unmeasured SPAD–Soil Plant Analyses Development–units, the value of which was closely related to chlorophyll content. The SPAD was measured three on each pot on the upper fully developed leaves. These measurements were taken at the five-leaf stage (15 BBCH), the third-leaf stage (33 BBCH), and the flowering stage (65 BBCH).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using the TIBCO Statistica 13.3.0 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) program. One-way ANOVA was applied; Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05) was used to determine the significance of differences between the mean values of the studied parameters.

3. Results

3.1. Compost Properties

The properties of the compost utilized in the experiment differed based on the compost type. The pH values of the resulting substrates ranged between 5.8 and 8.1. Compost 4 displayed the lowest values, while compost 6 exhibited the highest, as illustrated in Table 1. Of all the compost variants examined, compost 1 displayed the highest average nitrogen (N) content. Compost 3 exhibited the highest carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio at 37.72%, whereas compost 1 demonstrated the lowest C:N ratio at 19.25%. The P2O5 content varied from 13.00 g·kg−1 (compost 1) to 1.09 g·kg−1 (compost 2) on average. Composts 2, 5, and 6 exhibited the highest potassium (K2O) levels, measuring 6.88 g·kg−1, 7.63 g·kg−1, and 7.28 g·kg−1, respectively. Among the analyzed variants, compost 1 presented the highest concentration of lead (Pb), whereas compost 6 exhibited the highest concentrations of chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni).

3.2. Relative Content of Chlorophyll

The differences in the plant’s nutritional condition, assessed in SPAD units (Figure 1), exhibited significant variability among various fertilization approaches. During the initial assessment (15 BBCH), the SPAD index was notably highest with NPK mineral fertilization and organic variants C, D, and F, while the control displayed considerably lower readings. The SPAD readings for fertilizers E, G, and H did not show significant differences compared to the control. In the second assessment, plants fertilized with NPK minerals exhibited the best nourishment, followed by C and F variants, which also showed positive outcomes. By the third measurement, plants treated with NPK minerals alongside the variants C, D, and F displayed the most nourished state.

3.3. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

The Fv/Fm, representing the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII, showed higher values following the application of NPK mineral fertilization, along with fertilization using variants D and F, compared to the control. The introduction of the C variant showed a positive effect on the Fv/Fm measurement, yet the variance from the control was considered negligible. Moreover, the measurement of the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (Fv/F0) indicated the most favorable outcomes with NPK mineral fertilization and the variants C, D, and F. Conversely, significantly lower outcomes were noted in the control (A) and when employing variants E, G, and H.
The Performance Index (PI) reached its peak post the application of variant F, while variant C also displayed relatively high PI measurements compared to the control (A). As for the total number of active reaction centers for absorption (RC/ABS), its highest values were noted following the use of the F variant, significantly diverging from the lower values recorded in the control (A) (Table 2).

3.4. Gas Exchange

Leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rates (E) remained largely unaffected across the different variants compared to the control. Remarkably, the application of the D variant displayed a trend toward enhancing both parameters, though falling within the bounds of statistical error. However, the measurement of the intercellular CO2 concentration (CI) showed a significant increase, registering its highest levels in the control (188.0 µmol (CO2) mmol−1) and following only NPK mineral fertilization (188.0 µmol (CO2) mmol−1). Contrastingly, significantly lower CI readings were recorded after adding the variants C, D, F, G, and H. Regarding the net photosynthesis intensity (PN), variant D resulted in the highest values (19.8 µmol (CO2)·m−2s−1), while the application of the NPK mineral fertilization (10.8 µmol (CO2)·m−2s−1) led to the lowest PN levels (Table 3).

3.5. Biometric Parameters of Plants

NPK mineral fertilization (B) led to increased corn plant height (188.9 cm), with similarly tall plants observed after using C, D, and F variants. Variants E, G, and H resulted in shorter plants, while the control exhibited the shortest plants (132.9 cm), which is a distinction supported by statistical analysis. The influence of the variants used extended to cob length, with the longest cobs resulting from NPK mineral fertilization (17.5 cm), notably shorter ones observed after applying the variants E and H (respectively 13.63 and 13.25 cm), as well as in the control group (11.5 cm). There were considerable variations in grain count within the cob; the highest count was noted after NPK mineral fertilization (324 pieces), with significant numbers also seen following the use of variants D and F (302.3 and 273.1 pieces, respectively) compared to the control (155.5 pieces). The difference in cob grain count between NPK mineral fertilization and the control reached 168.5 grains, which was statistically confirmed. Furthermore, the thousand-grain weight reached its peak after NPK mineral fertilizer (285.2 g) application and with variant D (276.6), markedly distinct from variants C, E, F, G, H, and the control (248.1) (Table 4).

3.6. Plant Dry Weight and Grain Yield per Plant

The highest straw dry weight per individual plant was observed following mineral fertilization with NPK (B) and variant D (Figure 2). Variants C and F resulted in notably lower straw weights. Following fertilization with variants E, G, and H, the straw weight stayed consistently low, with the lowest recorded in the control (A). The difference in straw dry weight per individual plant between variants B and C, in comparison to the control (A), amounted to 88.7 and 76.3 g, respectively. Regarding the grain yield per individual plant, significant differences were noted among the various fertilization methods (Figure 2). NPK mineral fertilization (B) exhibited the most favorable effect on this parameter. A comparable grain weight per plant was observed after applying fertilizer D, although significantly lower yields were evident with the remaining variants, particularly E and G. The plants in the control group (A) produced the lowest grain weight. The difference in grain weight per individual plant between variants B and D, in contrast to the control (A), was recorded at 54.3 and 45.3 g, respectively.

3.7. Protein Content in Grain

The grain protein content notably increased after mineral or organic fertilization in comparison to the control. The results across individual fertilization variants (B–H) consistently exceeded 9% dry matter (D.M.). Contrastingly, the protein content in the control seeds stood at only 8.5% D.M. (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Modern agriculture places significant emphasis on adopting eco-friendly agrotechnical practices to concurrently improve field crop efficiency [29]. This urgency arises from the necessity to increase global food production in the upcoming years while mitigating negative impacts on the natural environment. Therefore, promoting practices like closed-loop systems in agriculture becomes significant, allowing for the recycling of organic waste. This approach enables the retrieval of a considerable quantity of nutrients, particularly nitrogen, while simultaneously cutting down on agricultural production expenses [54]. The ongoing industrialization, urbanization, and transformation in rural landscapes contribute to a continual surge in generated waste that requires thoughtful management. Converting organic waste into fertilizers stands out as one of the most effective solutions for managing such organic waste [55].
Our study assessed the viability of using various composted organic waste materials to fertilize corn, comparing their effectiveness against NPK mineral fertilization and a control group devoid of any fertilization (Table 1). The assessments of plant nutritional status, as indicated by SPAD units, unveiled significant differences among the various fertilization variants (Figure 1). Mineral (B) and organic fertilization in variants C and F exhibited the most positive impact on the SPAD index across all three measurements. However, variant D also yielded promising results in the initial and final measurements. Conversely, SPAD index readings following fertilization with variants E, G, and H did not significantly differ from the control, indicating their comparatively lower efficacy.
De Morais et al. [56] affirmed the varied release rates of nutrients from organic fertilizers, emphasizing the need to consider this factor post-application. Costa et al. [57] asserted the reliability, speed, and non-destructive nature of the SPAD chlorophyll meter in gauging plant nutritional status. Their research indicates a direct rise in SPAD meter readings with increasing nitrogen fertilizer dosage, although the correlation coefficient between SPAD readings and grain yield showed a moderately positive relationship. Szulc et al. [58] corroborated the efficacy of SPAD measurements in evaluating the efficiency of applied agrotechnical treatments, particularly nitrogen fertilization. Uddin et al. [59] noted that nitrogen fertilization elevates the chlorophyll content in corn leaves, resulting in significant enhancements in yield components, overall yield, and grain quality. Rostami et al. [60] confirmed that the use of biofertilizers notably amplifies the chlorophyll content and other biometric parameters in plants. However, they observed a substantial decline in the chlorophyll index with increased cadmium contamination levels in the soil.
Chlorophyll fluorescence assessments revealed the higher maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) following NPK mineral fertilization and variants D and F compared to the control. The maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (Fv/F0) was notably influenced by NPK mineral fertilization and variants C, D, and F. Variants F and C showcased the highest Performance Index (PI) readings, while the total number of active reaction centers for absorption (RC/ABS) peaked post-F fertilization (Table 2).
Maxwell et al. [61] highlighted chlorophyll fluorescence analysis as one of the most widely used techniques among plant physiologists and ecophysiologists. It proves particularly valuable in evaluating crop conditions subjected to diverse agrotechnical treatments, such as fertilization. Force et al. [62] affirmed the versatile applications of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, spanning from fundamental photosynthesis assessments to evaluating plant responses to environmental stressors or overall plant health (Table 3). Li et al. [63] demonstrated the adverse impact of nitrogen deficiency on photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo) in corn plants. They further established a significant correlation between the measured parameters of plant photosynthesis and the resulting grain yield.
Fertilization using variant D resulted in increased measurements of leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (E), although it fell within the margin of statistical error when compared to the control. The intercellular CO2 concentration (CI) was notably highest in the control and following NPK mineral fertilization. Net photosynthesis intensity (PN) peaked during the post-application of variant D, while its lowest point was registered after NPK mineral fertilization (B). Li et al. [63] provided evidence demonstrating that nitrogen fertilization enhanced leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) parameters during the corn grain filling stage.
In our study, the most impressive results, with the tallest plants averaging 188.9 cm, the longest cobs measuring 17.5 cm, and the highest grain count per cob at 324.0, emerged following NPK mineral fertilization (Table 4). The difference in cob grain count between NPK mineral fertilization and the control amounted to 168.5 grains. Moreover, the thousand-grain weight peaked after applying the NPK mineral fertilizer and variant D, standing out from variants C, E, F, G, H, and the control.
Muniswami et al. [64] highlighted the use of various alternative fertilizers and microorganisms in crop production, showcasing their effectiveness, especially in terms of plant morphology, yield, and grain quality in corn. Shinde Madhumati et al. [65] supported this by confirming the positive modification of corn parameters under organic fertilization, particularly when combining biofertilizers with bacteria like Azotobacter and Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria. Amanolahi-Baharvand et al. [66] and Ajami [67] underscored the significant impact of combining organic and mineral fertilization on corn yield components, surpassing the effects of singular applications. Yessoufou et al. [68] advocated for the optimal variant in corn cultivation, using the full dose of manure alongside half the recommended dose of mineral fertilizer. De Morais et al. [56] suggested supplementing slow-releasing organic fertilizers with additional mineral fertilization to boost corn biomass. Wu et al. [69] highlighted the conversion of organic waste into fertilizer via black soldier fly larvae (BSFL), noting its positive impact on photosynthetic parameters and the overall biomass of corn plants and roots. Furthermore, multiple authors [39,40,41] advocated composting or vermicomposting organic waste, utilizing earthworms like Eisenia fetida, as a beneficial approach to managing organic waste.
The highest individual plant straw dry weight was achieved through NPK mineral fertilization and variant D (Figure 2). In contrast, variants C, E, F, G, and H exhibited significantly lower straw weights, while the control, as expected, displayed the lowest straw weight due to the absence of fertilization. The difference in dry straw weight per individual plant between variants B and C, compared to the control (A), stood at 88.7 and 76.3 g, respectively.
de Matos Nascimento et al. [70] advocated for biofertilizers as a valuable nutrient source for corn, suggesting their potential to replace up to 22% of the mineral nitrogen fertilizer when appropriately utilized. Their research also highlighted the capacity of biofertilizers to enhance plant biomass while reducing cultivation costs. Liang et al. [71] observed that top dressing with a bio-gas slurry and substituting the chemical fertilizer prolonged the plants’ greenness, thereby extending their vegetation period. The grain weight per individual plant displayed significant variation across the evaluated fertilization variants (Figure 2). NPK mineral fertilization emerged as the most advantageous in terms of this parameter. While fertilizer D resulted in comparable grain weight per plant, the remaining variants, particularly E and G, exhibited significantly lower yields. The control plants yielded the lowest grain weight. The difference in grain weight per individual plant between variants B and D, compared to the control (A), amounted to 54.3 and 45.3 g, respectively.
Xin et al. [72] demonstrated that utilizing solely optimal doses of mineral fertilizer enhanced yields and efficiently utilized ingredients like phosphorus. However, they suggested that replacing a portion of chemical fertilizers with organic alternatives might be promising, contingent upon the cultivated species. In their experiments, combined mineral and organic fertilization yielded superior results in corn compared to wheat. Buligon et al. [73] advocated for biofertilizers, affirming their capacity to completely (100%) or partially (50%) substitute synthetic N fertilizers without compromising yield. They also found no significant impact on corn plant growth and development based on the method of biofertilizer application, whether in soil or as a foliar application. Naeem et al. [17] highlighted the potential of processing local organic waste into a fertilizer. They found optimal results through the combined use of organic and mineral fertilization, particularly in balanced proportions, yielding high crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts. Dineshkumar et al. [74] noted the positive impact of marine algae on seed germination and initial plant growth in corn cultivation. However, they found that a blend of cow manure and marine algae had the most advantageous effect on corn yield. Liu et al. [75] emphasized the multifaceted nature of fertilization effectiveness, affected by factors like soil quality and agrotechnical treatments such as forecrop or tillage. Yang et al. [76] suggested that while the effects of fertilization, including organic methods, yield reliable results, their full impact manifests in long-term field experiments. The excessive incorporation of inorganic fertilizers into the soil was cautioned against as poor agricultural practice. Zhai et al. [77] emphasized considering not just crop yield but also economic and ecological impacts while assessing the effects of fertilization. Zhang et al. [22] showcased how corn yield, after employing combined mineral and organic fertilizers, increased significantly (from 27.76% to 68.01%) compared to the control, contingent upon the specific fertilization variant used.
The protein content in corn grain significantly increased following NPK mineral fertilization or organic fertilization across all variants compared to the control, where the grain protein content stood at only 8.5% D.M. (Figure 3).
Fadlalla et al. [78] and Abd El-Gawad et al. [79] demonstrated that both mineral and organic fertilization not only improved corn yield but also enhanced the quality of the grain, particularly its protein content. Hu et al. [80] and Uddin et al. [59] further confirmed the positive impact of fertilization, including organic methods, on elevating the protein content in corn grain. They cautioned about the variation in nitrogen use from different fertilizers, emphasizing the need for careful planning in corn fertilization practices. Sabourifard et al. [42] highlighted the influence of FYM manure (200 kg N∙ha−1) on increasing the oil and linolenic acid content in corn grain. Additionally, they found the highest oil yield post-fertilization with urea and vermicompost. He et al. [81] raised concerns regarding the heavy metal content in certain fertilizers, especially unconventional ones. They underscored the importance of preventing soil and grain contamination with heavy metals in such scenarios.
Over-fertilization can lead to nitrogen loss, posing a risk in agricultural practices [4]. Comparatively, mineral and organic fertilization differ notably in the duration of nitrogen availability in plants. Studies have shown that applying 5 tons ha−1 of compost significantly increases maize productivity, enhancing both yield and yield components. Regarding nitrogen application, utilizing 130 kg·ha−1 has displayed better results compared to 65 kg N·ha−1. Splitting the nitrogen application, with half at sowing and half at the knee stage, notably boosts maize productivity. Therefore, for general maize cultivation, combining 5 tons ha−1 of compost with 130 kg of N·ha−1, split between sowing and the knee stage, is recommended [82].
The combination of compost with inorganic fertilizer at rates of 5 tons/ha alongside 50 kg urea/ha and 100 kg of diammonium phosphate/ha tends to yield better maize growth and higher yields compared to using only an inorganic fertilizer. Moreover, it contributes to the sustainable enhancement of the soil’s physico-chemical properties [83].
Organic material amendments in plots have shown enhanced emergence rates and improved growth properties in maize [84].
Research by Zhang et al. [85] has demonstrated that replacing 30% of N fertilizer with compost is an effective nutrient management strategy. It maintains N uptake and the yield of maize while reducing N loss and increasing soil fertility.
Studies have indicated that organic fertilizers can enhance the initial growth of corn, improving parameters like plant height, stem diameter, leaf count, and corn dry weight, comparable to chemical fertilizers. They also elevate chlorophyll levels and the leaf nitrogen content in corn, suggesting the potential of manure and compost as efficient nutrient sources for corn cultivation, potentially replacing chemical nitrogen fertilizers. Additionally, a SPAD meter has been proven effective in identifying soil nitrogen deficiencies [86].
Olowoake et al. [87] suggested that utilizing fertilizer CJ at a rate of 2.5 t/ha not only enhances soil productivity but also results in higher maize yields compared to using NPK 15–15–15 at 60 kg N/h.
In the research conducted by Jiagwe [88], maize yield significantly increased with various fertilizer applications—DAP, vermicompost, shaded stored manure, open-air stored manure, and cattle manure slurry—at identical nitrogen rates. All methods proved economically viable, with vermicompost standing out as the most financially sensible option. Furthermore, vermicomposting is an environmentally friendly technology known to reduce gaseous emissions and retain nutrients within cattle manure.
Supplementing with compost and NPK fertilizer notably enhanced the growth and yield metrics for maize. Parameters such as plant height (up to 26%), the number of leaves per plant (up to 20%), stem girth (up to 22%), and fresh maize fodder weight (up to 25%) exhibited significant increases. Additionally, concentrations of key macronutrients in maize leaves, such as nitrogen (up to 46%), phosphorus (up to 27%), and potassium (up to 38%), were notably elevated compared to the control. However, variations in phosphorus concentration within the maize leaves were observed among different compost treatments and NPK fertilizer applications [3].
Organic fertilizers encompass a diverse range of plant-derived substances, spanning from fresh or dried plant material to animal manures, litter, and agricultural by-products. They serve as exceptional soil amendments, offering a nutrient balance while enriching the soil with valuable organic matter. The application of manure to soil significantly enhances its physical and chemical properties, leading to improved maize grain yields. However, organic fertilizers generally contain lower nutrient concentrations, requiring substantial amounts for application, which can become cost-ineffective when transporting over long distances. Hence, utilizing locally accessible sources aligns perfectly with production strategies, ensuring practical and consistent use [89].

5. Conclusions

In the pot experiment, both mineral NPK and organic fertilization in variants C, D, and F demonstrated the most favorable impact on plant nutritional status and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. The intercellular CO2 concentration (CI) registered its highest levels in the control and post-NPK mineral fertilization. Net photo-synthesis intensity (PN) peaked following variant D fertilization, contrasting with its lowest point after NPK mineral fertilization. NPK mineral fertilization notably influenced plant height, cob length, and various yield components, including the number of grains per cob and MTZ. Variants D and F also showed a high number of grains per cob, while variant D positively affected thousand seed mass. Additionally, the highest straw dry weight and grain weight per plant were observed after NPK mineral fertilization and variant D application. The protein content in grains significantly increased following mineral or organic fertilization compared to the control. However, the results suggest that the use of organic fertilizers for corn cultivation yielded lesser effects compared to mineral NPK fertilization. This indicates that organic fertilizers alone might not entirely replace chemical counterparts. Variants E, G, and H showed a reduced performance, suggesting they might not meet the nitrogen requirements during corn’s rapid growth phase. Future experiments could explore the effectiveness of individual organic fertilizers combined with mineral nitrogen fertilization alongside soil chemical analysis post-experimentation for comprehensive insights.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation A.Z.; methodology, investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation, W.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by financial resources of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for scientific activities of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, University of Rzeszów.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sayara, T.; Basheer-Salimia, R.; Hawamde, F.; Sánchez, A. Recycling of Organic Wastes through Composting: Process Performance and Compost Application in Agriculture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sporchia, F.; Caro, D. Exploring the potential of circular solutions to replace inorganic fertilizers in the European Union. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 892, 164636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhatti, S.M.; Kandhro, M.A.; Bughio, Z.U.R.; Rajpar, I.; Shah, J.A.; Lund, M.M.; Bughio, H.U.R. Relative performance of various composts and NPK fertilizer on upgrowth and quality of foddermaize. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2021, 10, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Strenner, M.; Chmelíková, L.; Hülsbergen, K.J. Compost fertilization in organic agriculture- A Comparison of the impact on corn plants using field spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oluwa, O.E.; Ade Oluwa, O.O.; Aduramigba-Modupe, V.O. Residual fertilizer value of OBD-pluscompost for maize (Zea mays) production. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2015, 6, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, W.; Gu, X.; Du, Y.; Zheng, X.; Lu, S.; Cheng, Z.; Cai, W.; Chang, T. Optimizing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization regimes to improve maize productivity under double ridge-furrow planting with full film mulching. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 287, 108439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, W.L.; Yan, Y.; Cao, J.; Christie, P.; Fan, M.S. Effects of combined application of organic amendments and fertilizers on crop yield and soil organic matter: An integrated analysis of long-term experiments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 225, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gmitrowicz-Iwan, J.; Ligęza, S.; Pranagal, J.; Smal, H.; Wójcikowska-Kapusta, A. Improving acidic sandy soil properties for plant growth with dam reservoir sediments in the face of soaring fertiliser prices. Soil Tillage Res. 2023, 234, 105843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pang, X.P.; Letey, J. Organic farming challenge of timing nitrogen availability to crop nitrogen requirements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, X.Q.; Yang, Y.D.; Zhao, J.; Nie, J.W.; Zang, H.D.; Zeng, Z.H.; Olesen, J.E. Yield benefits from replacing chemical fertilizers with manure under water deficient conditions of the winter wheat–summer maize system in the North China Plain. Eur. J. Agron. 2020, 119, 126118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gezahegn, A.M. Role of integrated nutrient management for sustainable maize production. Int. J. Agron. 2021, 2021, 9982884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.; Zheng, H.F.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.Z.; Han, H.F.; Ning, T.Y. Crop-Livestock integration via maize straw recycling increased carbon sequestration and crop production in China. Agric. Syst. 2023, 210, 103722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anning, D.K.; Ghanney, P.; Qiu, H.; Abalori, T.A.; Zhang, C.; Luo, C. Stimulation of soil organic matter fractions by maize straw return and nitrogen fertilization in the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 191, 105061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, X.; Dai, S.; Meng, L.; He, M.; Wang, X.; Cai, Z.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, J.; Nardi, P.; Müller, C. Effects of 18 years repeated N fertilizer applications on gross N transformation rates in a subtropical rain-fed purple soil. App. Soil Ecol. 2023, 189, 104952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Berry, P.M.; Sylvester-Bradly, R.; Philipps, L.; Hatch, D.J.; Cuttle, S.P.; Rayns, F.W.; Gosling, P. Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use Manag. 2002, 18, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmad, R.; Arshad, M.; Khalid, A.; Zahir, Z.A. Effectiveness of organic-/bio-fertilizer supplemented with chemical fertilizers for improving soil water retention, aggregate stability, growth and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.). J. Sustain. Agric. 2008, 31, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naeem, U.; Afzaal, M.; Haq, I.U.; Qazi, A.; Yasar, A.; Tabinda, A.B.; Mahfooz, Y.; Naz, A.U.; Awan, H.A.; Ahmad, A. Investigating the effect of Aspergillus niger inoculated press mud (biofertilizer) on the potential of enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) yield, phosphorous use efficiency, and phosphorous agronomic efficiency. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elias, E.; Okoth, P.F.; Stoorvogel, J.J.; Berecha, G.; Mellisse, B.T.; Mekuriaw, A.; Gebre, S.; Selassie, Y.G.; Biratu, G.K.; Smaling, E.M. Cereal yields in Ethiopia relate to soil properties and N and P fertilizers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2023, 126, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mącik, M.; Gryta, A.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Frąc, M. New insight into the soil bacterial and fungal microbiome after phosphorus biofertilizer application as an important driver of regenerative agriculture including biodiversity loss reversal and soil health restoration. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 189, 104941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aliyu, K.T.; Kamara, A.Y.; Huising, J.; Adam, A.M.; Shehu, B.M.; Jibrin, J.M. Implication of blanket NPK application on nutrient balance of maize based on soil and tissue diagnosis approaches in the savannas of northern Nigeria. Environ. Res. Commun. 2023, 5, 065007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deiss, L.; Demyan, M.S.; Fulford, A.; Hurisso, T.; Culman, S.W. High-throughput soil health assessment to predict corn agronomic performance. Field Crops Res. 2023, 297, 108930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Jia, J.; Liao, W.; Amsili, J.P.; Schneider, R.L.; van Es, H.M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. Applicability of soil health assessment for wheat-maize cropping systems in smallholders’ farmlands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 353, 108558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sądej, W.; Żołnowski, A.C. Comparison of the effect of various long-term fertilization systems on the content and fractional composition of humic compounds in Lessive soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2019, 65, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sądej, W.; Żołnowski, A.C.; Marczuk, O. Content of phenolic compounds in soils originating from two long-term fertilization experiments. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2016, 42, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ocwa, A.; Harsanyi, E.; Széles, A.; Holb, I.J.; Szabó, S.; Rátonyi, T.; Mohammed, S. A bibliographic review of climate change and fertilization as the main drivers of maize yield: Implications for food security. Agric. Food. Secur. 2023, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mącik, M.; Gryta, A.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Frąc, M. The status of soil microbiome as affected by the application of phosphorus biofertilizer: Fertilizer enriched with beneficial bacterial strains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sarajuoghi, M.; Ardakani, M.R.; Nurmohammadi, G.; Kashani, A.; Rejali, F.; Mafakheri, S. Response of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) to different biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2012, 12, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, H.; Li, S.; Qiang, R.; Lu, E.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Q. Response of soil microbial community structure to phosphate fertilizer reduction and combinations of microbial fertilizer. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 899727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, C.; El-Sawah, A.M.; Ali, D.F.I.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Shaghaleh, H.; Sheteiwy, M.S. The integration of bio and organic fertilizers improve plant growth, grain yield, quality and metabolism of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, J.; Zhou, H.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Fertilization highly increased the water use efficiency of spring maize in dryland of northern china: A meta-analysis. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, Y.H.; Xu, M.G.; Gao, S.D.; Yang, X.Y.; Huang, S.M.; Liu, H.B.; Wang, B.R. Nitrogen use efficiency in a wheat–corn cropping 465 system from 15 years of manure and fertilizer applications. Field Crops Res. 2014, 157, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murmu, K.; Swain, D.K.; Ghosh, B.C. Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Organic Nutrient Management on Crop Growth and Yield and Soil Fertility in Tomato-Sweet Corn Production System. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1617–1626. Available online: https://www.cropj.com/murmu_7_11_2013_1617_1626.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2023).
  33. Taj, A.; Bibi, H.; Akbar, W.A.; Rahim, H.U.; Iqbal, M.; Ullah, S. Effect of poultry manure and NPK compound fertilizer on soil physicochemical parameters, NPK availability, and uptake by spring maize (Zea mays L.) in alkaline-calcareous soil. Gesunde Pflanz. 2023, 75, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Chen, W.; Wu, S.; Meng, Q.; Feng, H.; Siddique, K.H.M. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions by replacing inorganic fertilizer with organic fertilizer in wheat–maize rotation systems in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 344, 118494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Efosa, N.; Krause, H.M.; Hüppi, R.; Krauss, M.; Vaucher, N.; Zourek, F.; Mayer, J.; Six, J.; Bünemann, E.K. Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane after field application of liquid organic fertilizers and biochar. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 356, 108642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fan, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, T.; Liu, X.; Song, Y.; Tan, S.; Chen, Y.; Yan, P.; Wang, X. Effects of substituting synthetic nitrogen with organic amendments on crop yield, net greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint: A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2023, 301, 109035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fernández-Ortega, J.; Álvaro-Fuentes, J.; Cantero-Martínez, C. The use of double-cropping in combination with no-tillage and optimized nitrogen fertilization reduces soil N2O emissions under irrigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luo, H.; Zilio, M.; Sigurnjak, I.; Robles-Aguilar, A.A.; Michels, E.; Adani, F.; De Neve, S.; Meers, E. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and N-cycling-related genes following the application of biobased fertilizers. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 191, 105033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yao, C.; Guo, H.; Xu, H.; Yang, X.; Yao, Z.; Gu, J. Maize stalk incorporation increases N2O emissions that offset the benefit of SOC sequestration in a winter wheat-summer maize field: A four-year measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 352, 108507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, M.; Xin, X.; Meng, L.; Yan, X.; Zhao, C.; Cai, Z.; Zhu, A.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C. Long-term appropriate N management can continuously enhance gross N mineralization rates and crop yields in a maize-wheat rotation system. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2021, 59, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Asadu, C.O.; Aneke, N.G.; Egbuna, S.O.; Agulanna, A.C. Comparative studies on the impact of bio-fertilizer produced from agro-wastes using thermo-tolerant actinomycetes on the growth performance of Maize (Zea-mays) and Okro (Abelmoschus esculentus). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 12, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sabourifard, H.; Estakhr, A.; Bagheri, M.; Hosseini, S.J.; Keshavarz, H. The quality and quantity response of maize (Zea mays L.) yield to planting date and fertilizers management. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patra, R.K.; Behera, D.; Mohapatra, K.K.; Sethi, D.; Mandal, M.; Patra, A.K.; Ravindran, B. Juxtaposing the quality of compost and vermicompost produced from organic wastes amended with cow dung. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 114119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dey Chowdhury, S.; Suhaib, K.H.; Bhunia, P.; Surampalli, R.Y. A critical review on the vermicomposting of organic wastes as a strategy in circular bioeconomy: Mechanism, performance, and future perspectives. Environ. Technol. 2023, 5, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kumar, R.; Jha, S.; Singh, S.P.; Kumar, M.; Kumari, R.; Padbhushan, R. Organic waste recycling by vermicomposting amended with rock phosphate impacts the stability and maturity indices of vermicompost. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2023, 73, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maharjan, K.K.; Noppradit, P.; Techato, K. Potential of Eisenia fetida (Redworm) for the conversion of three varieties of organic waste. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2023, 12, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rupani, P.F.; Embrandiri, A.; Garg, V.K.; Abbaspour, M.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L. Vermicomposting of green organic wastes using Eisenia fetida under field conditions: A case study of a green campus. Waste Biomass Valorization 2023, 14, 2519–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. El-Hassanin, A.S.; Samak, M.R.; Ahmed, S.M.; Afifi, M.M.; El-Satar, A.; Aml, M. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals during composting and vermicomposting processes of sewage sludge. Egypt J. Chem. 2022, 65, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rékási, M.; Ragályi, P.; Sándor, D.B.; Szabó, A.; Rivier, P.A.; Farkas, C.; Szecsy, O.; Uzinger, N. Effect of composting and vermicomposting on potentially toxic element contents and bioavailability in sewage sludge digestate. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2023, 21, 101307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zapałowska, A.; Skwiercz, A.; Tereba, A.; Puchalski, C.; Malewski, T. Next-Generation Sequencing for Evaluating the Soil Nematode Diversity and Its Role in Composting Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zapałowska, A.; Matłok, N.; Piechowiak, T.; Szostek, M.; Puchalski, C.; Balawejder, M. Physiological and Morphological Implications of Using Composts with Different Compositions in the Production of Cucumber Seedlings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Meier, U. Growth Stages of Mono-and Dicotyledonous Plants; BBCH Monograph; Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry: Berlin, Germany; Braunschweig, Germany, 2001; p. 158. Available online: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/16359822/growth-stages-of-mono-and-dicotyledonous-plants-regione- (accessed on 19 November 2023).
  53. Ortiz-Monasterio, J.I.; Sayre, K.D.; Rajaram, S.; Mcmahon, M. Genetic progress in wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under four nitrogen rates. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moreira, S.G.; Hoogenboom, G.; Nunes, M.R.; Martin-Ryals, A.D.; Sanchez, P.A. Circular agriculture increases food production and can reduce N fertilizer use of commercial farms for tropical environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 163031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tiwari, N.; Rana, D.; Joshi, N. Role of Earthworm (Eisenia fetida) in Bioconversion of Kitchen Waste in a World of Shifting Climatic Condition. In Advances in Waste Management; Siddiqui, N.A., Baxtiyarovich, A.S., Nandan, A., Mondal, P., Eds.; AIR 2021; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2023; Volume 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. de Morais, E.G.; Silva, C.A.; Maluf, H.J.G.M.; Paiva, I.D.O.; de Paula, L.H.D. Effects of compost-based organomineral fertilizers on the kinetics of NPK release and maize growth in contrasting oxisols. Waste Biomass Valorization 2023, 14, 2299–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Costa, C.; Dwyer, L.M.; Dutilleul, P.; Doug, W.S.; Ma, B.L.; Smith, D.L. Inter-relationships of applied nitrogen, SPAD, and yield of leafy and non-leafy maize genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 2001, 24, 1173–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Szulc, P.; Bocianowski, J.; Nowosad, K.; Zielewicz, W.; Kobus-Cisowska, J. SPAD leaf greenness index: Green mass yield indicator of maize (Zea mays L.), genetic and agriculture practice relationship. Plants 2021, 10, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Uddin, M.K.; Yeasmin, S.; Mohiuddin, K.M.; Chowdhury, M.A.H.; Saha, B.K. Peat-based organo-mineral fertilizer improves nitrogen use efficiency, soil quality, and yield of baby corn (Zea mays L.). Sustainability 2023, 15, 9086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rostami, F.; Heydari, M.; Golchin, A.; Igdelou, N.K.M. Effect of bio-fertilizers on corn (Zea mays L.) growth characteristics in Cd-spiked soils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 2651–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Force, L.; Critchley, C.; van Rensen, J.J. New fluorescence parameters for monitoring photosynthesis in plants. Photosynth. Res. 2003, 78, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, C.; Wan, D.; Xu, X.; Li, J.; Gaffney, P.P.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, L. Anti-substitution effect of coupling crop and livestock production on fertilizer use: Evidence from Chinese smallholder farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 412, 137359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Muniswami, D.M.; Buvaneshwari, K.; Fathima, R.M.L.; Naveena, T.; Pabitha, B.; Reshma, S.; Rangila, D.; Santhiya, P.; Sharmila, D.N.; Ahamed, R.A.; et al. Comparative assessment of different biofertilizers in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 5661–5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shinde, M.Y.; Khade, S.K.; Patil, V.A. Effect of biofertilizers on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties eco-92 and african tall. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2019, 11, 5149–5153. [Google Scholar]
  66. Amanolahi-Baharvand, Z.; Zahedi, H.; Sharghi, Y.; Seifolahi-Nik, S. Comparative assessment of conventional and organic nutrient management on yield and yield components of three corn cultivars. Int. J. Biosci. 2014, 4, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ajami, N. Evaluation effectiveness of chemical and biological fertilizers combination on corn (Zea mays L.) yield. J. Crop Nutr. Sci. 2016, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yessoufou, M.W.; Tovihoudji, P.G.; Sissou, Z.; Adjogboto, A.; Djenontin, A.J.; Akponikpè, P.I. Hill-placement of manure and fertilizer for improving maize nutrient-and water-use efficiencies in the northern Benin. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wu, N.; Yu, X.; Liang, J.; Mao, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, X. A full recycling chain of food waste with straw addition mediated by black soldier fly larvae: Focus on fresh frass quality, secondary composting, and its fertilizing effect on maize. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Matos Nascimento, A.; Maciel, A.M.; Silva, J.B.G.; Mendonça, H.V.; de Paula, V.R.; Otenio, M.H. Biofertilizer application on corn (Zea mays) increases the productivity and quality of the crop without causing environmental damage. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yao, Z.; Qiu, X.; Wang, J.; He, W. Biogas slurry topdressing as replacement of chemical fertilizers reduces leaf senescence of maize by up-regulating tolerance mechanisms. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 344, 118433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xin, X.L.; Qin, S.W.; Zhang, J.B.; Zhu, A.M.; Yang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.F. Yield, phosphorus use efficiency and balance response to substituting long-term chemical fertilizer use with organic manure in a wheat-maize system. Field Crops Res. 2017, 208, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Buligon, E.L.; Costa, L.A.M.; de Lucas, J., Jr.; Santos, F.T.; Goufo, P.; Costa, M.S.S.M. Fertilizer performance of a digestate from swine wastewater as synthetic nitrogen substitute in maize cultivation: Physiological growth and yield responses. Agriculture 2023, 13, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dineshkumar, R.; Subramanian, J.; Gopalsamy, J.; Jayasingam, P.; Arumugam, A.; Kannadasan, S.; Sampathkumar, P. The impact of using microalgae as biofertilizer in maize (Zea mays L.). Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. Organic amendments alter microbiota assembly to stimulate soil metabolism for improving soil quality in wheat-maize rotation system. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 339, 117927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yang, Z.C.; Zhao, N.; Huang, F.; Lv, Y.Z. Long-term effects of different organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments on soil organic carbon sequestration and crop yields on the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 146, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhai, L.C.; Wang, Z.B.; Zhai, Y.C.; Zhang, L.H.; Zheng, M.J.; Yao, H.P.; Lv, L.H.; Sheng, H.P.; Zhang, J.T.; Yao, Y.R.; et al. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer benefits grain yield, water use efficiency, and economic return of summer maize. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 217, 105287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fadlalla, H.A.; Abukhlaif, H.A.; Mohamed, S.S. Effects of chemical and bio-fertilizers on yield, yield components and grain quality of maize (Zea mays L.). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 4654–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abd El-Gawad, A.M.; Morsy, A.S.M. Integrated impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and soil properties under Upper Egypt conditions. J. Plant Prod. 2017, 8, 1103–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hu, C.; Sadras, V.O.; Wang, Z.; Du, W.; Lei, X.; Yang, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, P.; Liu, J.; Lu, G.; et al. Yield-and protein-neutral reduction in fertilizer rate for wheat, maize and rice can reduce the release of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2023, 18, 064031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. He, H.; Peng, M.W.; Ru, S.B.; Hou, Z.N.; Li, J.H. A suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratio could improve maize yield and 463 soil fertility with low pollution risk. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 988663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ali, S.; Uddin, S.; Ullah, O.; Shah, S.; Ali, S.U.D.T.; Ud Din, I. Yield and yield components of maize response tocompost and fertilizer-nitrogen. Food Sci. Qual. Manag. 2012, 38, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  83. Laekemariam, F.; Gidago, G. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to integrated fertilizer application in Wolaita, South Ethiopia. Adv. Life Sci. Technol. 2012, 5, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, W.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Huang, G. Effects of organic amendment incorporation on maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield and water-fertilizer productivity under arid conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 269, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Christie, P.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Maize yield and soil fertility with combined use of compost and inorganic fertilizers on a calcareous soil on the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Naderi, R.; Ghadiri, H. Urban waste compost, manure and nitrogen fertilizer effects on the initial growth of corn (Zea mays L.). Desert 2010, 15, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  87. Olowoake, A.A.; Osunlola, O.S.; Ojo, J.A. Influence of compost supplemented with jatropha cake on soil fertility, growth, and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a degraded soil of Ilorin, Nigeria. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2018, 7, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jjagwe, J.; Chelimo, K.; Karungi, J.; Komakech, A.J.; Lederer, J. Comparative performance of organic fertilizers in maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield, and economic results. Agronomy 2020, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gezahegn, A.M. Effect of Organic Fertilizers on Maize (Zea mays L.) Production and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties. World Appl. Sci. J. 2021, 39, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD). A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—different variant fertilizers (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Figure 1. Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD). A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—different variant fertilizers (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Sustainability 16 00511 g001
Figure 2. Dry mass of straw and grain from the plant. A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—variant fertilizer, (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Figure 2. Dry mass of straw and grain from the plant. A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—variant fertilizer, (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Sustainability 16 00511 g002
Figure 3. Total protein content in grain. A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—variant fertilizer, (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Figure 3. Total protein content in grain. A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H—variant fertilizer, (n = 4). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The standard error is marked on the columns.
Sustainability 16 00511 g003
Table 1. The chemical properties of compost used. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations. Different letters a, b, c, d, e indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 1. The chemical properties of compost used. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations. Different letters a, b, c, d, e indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
ParameterCompost Variants
Compost 1Compost 2Compost 3Compost 4Compost 5Compost 6
pH in KCl5.9c6.3c7.1b5.8c7.1b8.1a
Dry matter (%)27.6d35.7c55.5a26.3d35.8c44.9b
N (%)4.02 ± 0.32a1.82 ± 0.14c1.01 ± 0.08d2.59 ± 0.20b1.86 ± 0.14c1.56 ± 0.12cd
P2O5 (g·kg−1 d.m.)13.00 ± 1.04a1.09 ± 0.01d2.01 ± 0.16cd9.42 ± 0.75b8.89 ± 0.71b3.64 ± 0.29c
K2O5 (g·kg−1 d.m.)4.93 ± 0.30bc6.88 ± 0.55ab4.63 ± 0.37c5.09 ± 0.40b7.63 ± 0.61a7.28 ± 0.58a
C:N (%)19.25 ± 0.91d23.57 ± 0.86c37.72 ± 0.54a28.06 ± 0.42b21.29 ± 0.38cd30.32 ± 0.19b
Mg (%)0.32 ± 0.03b0.32 ± 0.03b0.20 ± 0.00b0.34 ± 0.03b0.3 ± 0.03b0.51 ± 0.02a
Ca (%)1.7 ± 0.11bc1.52 ± 0.09c1.95 ± 0.08b2.13 ± 0.02ab1.64 ± 0.15c2.34 ± 0.14a
Pb (mg·kg−1 d.m.)10.0 ± 0.8a<8.0a<8.0a<8.0a<8.0a<8.0a
Cr (mg·kg−1 d.m.)<10c<10c12.0 ± 0.96b12.0 ± 0.93b11.0 ± 0.90b23.0 ± 1.84a
Cu (mg·kg−1 d.m.)70.0 ± 5.6b58.0 ± 4.64c16.0 ± 1.28e84.0 ± 6.72a45.0 ± 3.6d16.0 ± 1.28e
Ni (mg·kg−1 d.m.)<5.0b<5.0b5.3 ± 0.42b<5.0b5.1 ± 0.40b11.0 ± 0.88a
Cd (mg·kg−1 d.m.)0.44 ± 0.03ab0.42 ± 0.03ab0.34 ± 0.03b0.5 ± 0.05a0.38 ± 0.03b0.35 ± 0.03b
Zn (mg·kg−1 d.m.)253 ± 20.2b223 ± 17.8c91.0 ± 7.28d274 ± 21.91a232 ± 18.56c78.0 ± 6.24e
Hg (mg·kg−1 d.m.)0.132 ± 0.01b0.104 ± 0.01c0.026 ± 0.01d0.18 ± 0.01a0.066 ± 0.01d0.042 ± 0.01d
Table 2. Plant physiological measurements. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations, (n = 4). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 2. Plant physiological measurements. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations, (n = 4). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
VariantFv/Fm
(Maximal Photochemical Efficiency of PSII)
Fv/F0
(Maximum Quantum Yield of Primary Photochemistry)
PI
(Performance Index)
RC/ABS
(Total Numer of Active Reaction Centes for Absorbtion)
A0.78 ± 0.002b3.74 ± 0.05b3.11 ± 0.87d1.45 ± 0.25b
B0.82 ± 0.006a4.05 ± 0.14a4.37 ± 0.94b1.77 ± 0.26ab
C0.80 ± 0.007ab4.07 ± 0.17a4.62 ± 2.05ab1.71 ± 0.53ab
D0.81 ± 0.003a3.99 ± 0.07a4.22 ± 0.89b1.68 ± 0.24ab
E0.77 ± 0.009b3.70 ± 0.28b3.68 ± 1.18cd1.74 ± 0.34ab
F0.81 ± 0.009a4.03 ± 0.30a5.21 ± 1.64a2.01 ± 0.41a
G0.78 ± 0.007b3.77 ± 0.20b3.88 ± 1.75bc1.64 ± 0.49ab
H0.77 ± 0.009b3.76 ± 0.21b3.37 ± 1.42cd1.54 ± 0.39ab
Table 3. Plant physiological measurements, cont. Different letters a, b, c, d, e indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 3. Plant physiological measurements, cont. Different letters a, b, c, d, e indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
VariantGs
(Stomatal Conductance, mmlo (H2O)·m−2s−1)
E
(Transpiration Rate, mmlo (H2O)·m−2s−1)
CI
(Intercellular CO2 Concentration, µmol (CO2) mmol−1)
PN
(Net Photosynthetic Rate, µmol (CO2)·m−2s−1)
A0.11 ± 0.03a1.65 ± 0.25a188.0 ± 15.3a12.1 ± 2.61bc
B0.10 ± 0.09a1.39 ± 0.84a183.0 ± 45.3a10.8 ± 7.84c
C0.08 ± 0.02a1.27 ± 0.24a139.0 ± 39.9de11.5 ± 1.01bc
D0.16 ± 0.08a2.05 ± 0.73a133.5 ± 34.7e19.8 ± 5.88a
E0.13 ± 0.02a1.93 ± 0.18a168.5 ± 15.2ab15.3 ± 1.65ab
F0.10 ± 0.02a1.62 ± 0.16a163.2 ± 24.9bc13.1 ± 2.76bc
G0.13 ± 0.01a1.95 ± 0.08a152.0 ± 20.9cd16.7 ± 1.82ab
H0.13 ± 0.01a1.91 ± 0.09a147.0 ± 11.7cd16.4 ± 1.19ab
Table 4. The chosen biometric measurements of corn plants. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations, (n = 4). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 4. The chosen biometric measurements of corn plants. Results are expressed as the mean value ± standard deviations, (n = 4). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
VariantPlant Height (cm)Length of Cob (cm)Number of Grains in the CobThousand Grain Weight (g)
A132.9 ± 13.91c11.50 ± 0.58c155.5 ± 56.1c248.1 ± 6.52e
B188.9 ± 14.58a17.50 ± 0.58a324.0 ± 51.6a285.2 ± 3.48a
C168.5 ± 7.12ab15.75 ± 1.89ab266.0 ± 44.1b273.5 ± 3.52bc
D174.5 ± 11.13ab15.50 ± 1.29ab302.3 ± 27.3ab276.6 ± 2.22ab
E160.1 ± 9.76b13.63 ± 1.25b221.0 ± 60.6b264.9 ± 5.04cd
F167.4 ± 11.41ab14.75 ± 1.50ab273.1 ± 60.7ab274.6 ± 2.94b
G160.2 ± 10.59b14.00 ± 2.16ab200.3 ± 29.8bc264.6 ± 3.39cd
H161.8 ± 10.80b13.25 ± 1.89b254.5 ± 45.8b261.8 ± 2.42d
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zapałowska, A.; Jarecki, W. The Impact of Using Different Types of Compost on the Growth and Yield of Corn. Sustainability 2024, 16, 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020511

AMA Style

Zapałowska A, Jarecki W. The Impact of Using Different Types of Compost on the Growth and Yield of Corn. Sustainability. 2024; 16(2):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zapałowska, Anita, and Wacław Jarecki. 2024. "The Impact of Using Different Types of Compost on the Growth and Yield of Corn" Sustainability 16, no. 2: 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop