Next Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Trends of Major Agricultural Crops in Romania Using Interactive Geographic Information System Mapping
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Cytocompatibility Assessment of Novel 3D Chitin/Glucan- and Cellulose-Based Decellularized Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Does Asia’s Financial Intermediation of China’s Solar Industry during the 2020s Exhibit a “California Effect”?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microplastics in Aquatic and Food Ecosystems: Remediation Coupled with Circular Economy Solutions to Create Resource from Waste
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Knowledge, Research Progress, and Future Prospects of Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles Interactions with Food Crops under Induced Drought Stress

1
Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Department of Botany, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
4
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
5
Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea
6
Biotechnology Department, University of Samarra, Samarra 34010, Iraq
7
Department of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(20), 14792; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792
Submission received: 3 September 2023 / Revised: 27 September 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023

Abstract

:
Drought stress threatens global food security and requires creative agricultural solutions. Recently, phyto-synthesized nanoparticles NPs have garnered attention as a way to reduce food crop drought. This extensive research examines how phyto-synthesized NPs improve crop growth and biochemistry in drought-stressed situations. The review begins with an introduction highlighting the urgency of addressing the agricultural challenges posed by drought. It also highlights the significance of nanoparticles synthesized from photosynthesis in this context. Its purpose is to underscore the importance of sustainable farming practices. This approach is contrasted with conventional methods, elucidating the ecological and economic advantages of phyto-synthesized NPs. This review discusses phyto-synthesized nanoparticles, including titanium dioxide, iron oxide, gold, silver, and copper. In addition, we review their ability to enhance crop growth and stress resistance. The primary focus is to elucidate the effects of phyto-synthesized NPs on plant development under drought stress. Noteworthy outcomes encompass improvements in seed germination, seedling growth, water absorption, photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, the activation of antioxidant defense mechanisms, and the modulation of hormonal responses. These results underscore the potential of phyto-synthesized NPs as agents for enhancing growth and mitigating stress. The review assesses the risks and challenges of using phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture. Considerations include non-target organisms, soil, and environmental impacts. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects, dangers, and benefits of phyto-synthesized NPs. Nanoparticles offer a targeted and sustainable approach for improving plant drought tolerance, outpacing traditional methods in ethics and ecological balance. Their mechanisms range from nutrient delivery to molecular regulation. However, the long-term environmental impact remains understudied. This review is critical for identifying research gaps and advancing sustainable agricultural practices amid global water scarcity.

1. Introduction

1.1. Drought Stress and Its Impact on Plant Growth and Development

Drought stress occurs in plants with an internal water deficit due to an inadequate water supply. The condition manifests when plants are without sufficient water for an extended period. Plants’ physiology, morphology, and productivity can all be drastically altered by drought stress. One significant effect of drought stress is reducing crop yields [1,2]. Plants cannot carry out their critical physiological functions when deprived of water. The plant’s photosynthesis, nutritional uptake, and hormonal balance may all suffer, causing stunted growth, withering, and even death [3,4]. Drought stress also interferes with many plant processes. Many biological activities, such as cellular respiration, which produces energy, require water. These mechanisms, metabolic activity, and plant health, in general, suffer when water is scarce [5,6,7]. Stomatal apertures, which regulate the exchange of gases and water vapor between the plant and the environment, are similarly affected by drought stress. Increased transpiration can worsen water shortages caused by this interruption [8,9].
Drought stress causes plants to adapt physiologically by altering gene expression, accumulating Osmo protectants (such as proline and carbohydrates), and activating stress-responsive signaling cascades. These systems can aid plants in dealing with drought stress, but they are usually insufficient to prevent serious crop production decreases [10,11]. Understanding the effects of drought stress on plants and the processes disrupted under these conditions is essential for developing solutions to alleviate the detrimental repercussions of drought stress on agriculture and the environment. Understanding the complex mechanisms involved in the drought stress response might help researchers and agricultural practitioners increase crop resilience, enhance water management practices, and guarantee food security in the face of more unpredictable climatic conditions [12,13,14,15].

1.2. Why Phyto-Synthesized NPs Are Promising

Phyto-synthesized NPs are a diverse group of nanoparticles, economically crucial for the production of crops and resilience against drought conditions. Phyto-synthesized NPs have shown many unique properties by increasing efficiency and surface-area-to-volume ratios. This leads to beneficial nutrient uptake and effects on growth, breaches the biological blocks, and links with plant organisms at the molecular level [16,17]. Previous studies showed that specific photo-synthesized NPs could improve the photosynthetic ability of plants, letting them cope with water-stress conditions and capture and utilize light more efficiently. Moreover, this improvement in photosynthesis makes plants capable of surviving during drought [18,19]. It accelerates their growth and productivity, thus leading to abundant agricultural yields. Silver nanoparticles are potent candidates for applying phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture [18,20,21,22,23]. Silver nanoparticles have been shown to enhance the water retention capacity of soils, reducing water loss through evaporation and increasing water availability for plant uptake during dry periods [24,25,26].
Moreover, these nanoparticles can stimulate the expression of stress-related genes in plants, leading to improved drought tolerance and better adaptation to challenging environmental conditions [27]. Silver nanoparticles are the most critical candidate for phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture [28,29,30], according to previous research, which explains that this particle showed the best results by increasing the water retention capability of soils, decreasing water loss through evaporation, and enhancing the availability of water uptake during drought conditions [31,32]. Functionally, these particles can regulate the expression of stress-related genes in plants, helping in drought tolerance and adaptations against challenging environmental conditions [33,34].
In conditions like less nutrient availability and uptake to plants in arid soils, encapsulated nutrients in nanoparticles are used to ensure their targeted delivery in the roots of plants. Regardless of the encouraging benefits of nanoparticles in the agricultural field, it is hard to consider their potential risks and effects on the environment [35,36]. Nanoparticles can interact with various microorganisms and beneficial insects. Therefore, their long-lasting effects should be deeply investigated. When incorporated into agricultural settings, these nanoparticles should not harm the ecosystem, biodiversity, and human well-being [35,36,37]. Regulatory authorities and researchers must oversee the risk assessment to calculate the potential environmental influence of nanoparticles in the agricultural sector [38,39,40]. According to prior studies, the changes in the soil, their nutrient uptake and accumulation in plant cells, and their effects on other non-targeted organisms are important [41,42,43]. Phyto-synthesized NPs counter abiotic conditions like drought and less crop production. Nevertheless, systematic research is necessary to observe their mode of action, potential threats, and related risks to check their potential and ensure their safe use fully [44,45]. The outcomes of prior research indicate that these particular aspects and particles possess the potential to serve as integral instruments for enhancing worldwide food security during the epoch of climate fluctuations and the burgeoning of the human populace [46,47,48].

1.3. Review Scope and Approach

This review focuses on the characterization and synthesis of various phyto-synthesized NPs, their responses to drought conditions, and their effects on plant growth. The study also explores molecular mechanisms and environmental concerns. It identifies research gaps for future investigation in utilizing various phyto-synthesized NPs to tackle agricultural challenges amidst global climate change. For this study, we thoroughly reviewed the most recent literature on the characteristics of nanoparticles. Our investigation involves a thorough comparison of these results with the field’s present and projected futures. Reputable academic databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, Elsevier, and the NCBI official repository were used to research this time period, which runs from 2017 through 2023. The discussion encompasses diverse nanoparticles, their synthesis methods, growth impacts, water relations, antioxidant properties, and interactions with the photosynthesis system. Additionally, potential challenges and risks in agricultural applications are acknowledged. This neutral and comprehensive review contributes valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field.

2. Phyto-Synthesis of Nanoparticles

2.1. Green Synthesis Approach

In recent years, the green synthesis approach has emerged as an eco-friendly and promising phyto-synthesized NP method. The inventive technique includes using plant-derived elements by reducing and stabilizing the agents to produce nanoparticles of different materials, like metal and metal oxide [49,50,51]. This synthesis deals with numerous benefits, such as cost-effectiveness and sustainability. It decreases the potential threats linked to traditional chemical methods. A significant example of the green synthesis approach is the application of plant extract and bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, terpenoids, polyphenols, and flavonoids as reducing agents in the synthetic process, as shown in Table 1. These biomolecules of plant extracts have intrinsic properties, making them capable of reducing metal ions and helping produce nanoparticles [10,52,53,54,55].
Moreover, the extract acts as a stabilizing agent, inhibiting agglomeration and ensuring the stability of nanoparticles by increasing their capability and applicability in different fields. Furthermore, using plant-based materials to synthesize nanoparticles is a sustainable alternative to conventional methods using toxic chemicals and high energy. This approach of plant-derived compounds is readily available and biodegradable, contributing to the friendly environment [63,64,65]. These green synthesized nanoparticles proved very applicable in drug delivery, catalysis, environmental remediation, and agriculture. According to previous studies, silver nanoparticle synthesis from leaf extracts of certain plants showed excellent antimicrobial properties, demonstrating that these plants have strong antibacterial properties [63,64,65]. Similarly, the iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by the green synthesis method showed the properties of removing pollutants from the wastewater, allowing a green solution for water treatment. Hence, the green synthesis method is a more sustainable and promising avenue for nanomaterial production [66,67,68].

2.2. Advantages of Phyto-Synthesis over Other Methods

Phyto-synthesis has developed as an encouraging and sustainable alternative to conventional synthetic methods, putting away beneficial interests among industries and scientists. The significant benefit of Phyto-synthesis is the reduction in energy consumption compared to other physical and chemical conventional methods [69,70,71]. Practice plant extract is a stabilizing and reducing agent, minimizing the need for high-temperature and energy-intensive processes. This approach is cost-saving and helps with achieving a greener community by reducing nanoparticles’ overall carbon footprint production [72,73]. The critical advantage of phyto-synthesized NPs is biocompatibility, as plant extracts are used for synthesis. The obtained nanoparticles are inherently more compatible with biological systems [74,75]. It opens up various applications in medicines like drug delivery systems, where the human body more freely consumes the nanoparticles by reducing potential adverse reactions. One major factor is the production of toxic-free end products in photosynthesis, as described in Table 2 [76,77,78].
Further, most processes end with hazardous chemicals, which may lead to high risks to human health and cause environmental pollution. In contrast to phyto-synthesized NPs and chemical extracts, prior ones are safe for researchers and workers and eco-friendly for the environment [79]. The previous study utilized green phyto-synthesis to produce silver nanoparticles using Aloe vera leaf extract. The scientists combine the plant extract with a sliver salt solution and allow the mixture to undergo a heating process. The resulting products maintain excellent biocompatibility and stability, making them suitable nanoparticles for active biomedical applications, such as wound-healing agents and antibacterial properties [84,85]. The green synthesis process also offers better control over the size and shape of nanoparticles, a critical aspect for modifying their characteristics for specific use and function. Phyto-synthesis has an excess of advantages over other conventional methods. It is environmentally friendly, biocompatible, has no toxic chemicals, and decreases energy consumption costs, providing a promising path for sustainable production of nanoparticles. Soon, due to deep research to understand plant-based synthesis methods and explore new plant resources, we can advance with more innovative advancements and applications in this field [86,87].

3. Phyto-Synthesized-NPs and Their Applications in Agriculture

Various phyto-synthesized NPs have recently gained attention in the agricultural field. The use of these nanoparticles in agriculture proved to be more efficient and convenient for the environment and provide good crop health compared to other conventional synthetic nanoparticles. These play a vital role in avoiding toxic environmental components, keeping the ecosystem preserved, and safeguarding the health of consumers and farmers [10,88]. One significant advantage of various phyto-synthesized NPs is their safety usage. In contrast to local synthetic nanoparticles that indeed have unknown prolonged effects, green synthetic nanoparticles have fewer adverse issues for human health and the environment [89,90]. The alternative significant factor is cost-saving, which drives their practice in the agricultural field. Although the synthetic process relies on plant extracts, the production cost is relatively low. In addition, as shown in Table 3, these nanoparticles become readily available to many farmers, including in developing countries, to improve agronomic practices globally [60,63].
Moreover, the versatile nature of phyto-synthesized NPs opens up various applications in farming. The most important feature is their antimicrobial activity, which controls diseases linked to weeds, insects, and pests in crops [66]. With various phyto-synthesized NPs, farmers can decrease the resilience of harmful pesticides by promoting safe cultivation practices and reducing the issues linked with chemical exposure [118,119]. When harnessed into the soil, these will enhance nutrient availability, resulting in better plant growth and higher yields. The presence of nanoparticles in the soil can help against soil erosion, increasing sustainable land management practices [120,121]. By understanding their potential threats, recent research has shown the successful preparation of silver nanoparticles synthesized from the Azadirachta indica, natively known as the Neem tree. The plant extract of the Neem tree controls fungal pathogens in crops [122,123]. Research showed excellent activity against fungal pathogens and enhanced stability, constructing them as a valuable and efficient way of disease management in agriculture. It has opened new horizons in the agronomy field for sustainable development goals. Safe usage, environmental friendliness, affordability, and various applications make them a reliable asset in advanced cultivation practices [124,125,126]. However, researchers contribute to exploring new potential. We hope for future advancements and innovative usage of nanoparticles to transform agricultural ways and subsidize greener and cleaner crop production. Table 4 presents comprehensive information and explains the structure of nanoparticle-reduced drought stress damage and adverse effects in plants [127,128].
Several methods can synthesize nanoparticles, including chemical vapor deposition and sol–gel synthesis, to achieve specific particle properties. Post-synthesis treatments may further refine these characteristics after the completed synthesis [58]. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy are commonly used to evaluate nanoparticles’ physical and chemical properties. The suitability of nanoparticles for application depends on the synthesis and the characterization of the particles [55]. We outline some examples of nanoparticles that help plants cope with drought stress conditions and alleviate their adverse effects in the following sections.

3.1. Silver Nanoparticles (Ag-NPs)

Silver nanoparticles showed relatively good antifungal and antimicrobial properties, assisting them to control different diseases of plants and enhance their production rate. One convenient method for synthesizing Ag-NPs involves using various plant extracts, such as Aloe Vera, Azadirachta indica, and Ocimum sanctum [153,154,155]. Ag-NPs proved very useful against multiple stresses, but drought or water stress is the most important. Recent studies demonstrated that silver nanoparticles enhanced the Fusarium oxysporum growth rate of a root, leaf area, and shoot [156,157,158]. The previous studies also showed that Ag-NPs synthesized with Justica adhatoda leaf extract could improve chickpeas’ growth rate and yield by improving photosynthesis, antioxidant activity, and nutrient uptake [159]. Several articles have recently been explored for testing Ag-NP’s response to kill off dangerous bacteria and fungi and inhibit crop growth. As a result, these nanoparticles proved to be an ideal candidate in the agricultural field, where pathogens can frequently affect the crop’s growth, yield, and quality [160,161,162,163]. Ag-NPs proved the best alternative to various synthetic and chemical pesticides. Specifically, the leaf extract of Moringa oleifera can fight against bacterial blight disease in pomegranate trees, usually caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis bacteria [164,165].
Earlier research concluded that their findings proved safe alternatives to chemical-based sprays to inhibit insecticide growth and create an eco-friendly environment. Another extract from Justicia adhatoda leaf showed the properties of improving growth rate in chickpeas [166,167,168]. Applying Ag-NPs on chickpeas revealed the positive aspects of increased photosynthesis, antioxidant activities, and nutrient absorption. Moreover, when silver nanoparticles were extracted from the leaf of Carum copticum, plant development increased by increasing sunlight absorption and nutrient availability and reducing the damage caused by oxidation [169,170,171,172]. Ag-NPs are very helpful in the production of the wheat crop by enhancing wheat grains’ quality and safety from different fungal attacks. Suggestions might be the effectiveness and protection of these NPs in the most popular staple food crop (wheat) globally [172,173,174,175]. Ag-NPs can be used as safe fertilizers in agricultural sectors instead of chemical fertilizers. These NPs can cause several potential impacts on the environment and regulatory issues, so it is necessary to understand their mode of action in promoting plant growth and disease control actions [85,176,177,178].

3.2. Gold Nanoparticles (Au-NPs)

In drought conditions of plants, the use of gold nanoparticles helps the plants to grow and also facilitates the process of photosynthesis. Moreover, Au-NPs have been shown to have incredible features in protecting plants from their oxidative reactions caused by drought conditions through anti-oxidative activity [179,180,181]. To synthesize Au-NPs, some plant extracts such as green tea, grape seeds, and lemon peel are more efficient to a large extent. During dry seasons, plants can improve performance and physiology when they contact gold particles—specifically, growth rate and yield increase when green tea extract synthesizes Au-NPs [182,183,184]. According to Wahab et al., 2023, Au-NPs help plants to take up nutrients efficiently from soil and enhance their photosynthetic pigments that provide the best food resources for plants [185]. According to El-Saadony et al., 2022, using grape seeds for gold nanoparticles showed increased nutrient absorption, photosynthesis, antioxidant process, growth, and best yield quality in wheat crops [186]. During drought stress, when plants can easily be affected by microbes, the gold nanoparticles proved to help fight against microbes due to antimicrobial activity by inhibiting infection rates caused by pathogens. The fundamental features of Au-NPs are to combat disease and increase the immunity system in plants. The growth and development of plants in contact with Au-NPs enhance the ability to penetrate plant tissues, allowing [187,188].
Moreover, Au-NPs not only help deliver micronutrients but also improve the germination of seeds and the growth rate of tissues. Au-NPs may also increase plant development by controlling gene expression and their activating pathways [189]. Above and beyond influencing the expression of a gene, Au-NPs might also cooperate with plant membranes and enhance the ability of drought tolerance. However, the exact process of their activity is still unknown. For scavenging oxygen-reactive species, gold nanoparticles fight oxidative damage triggered during drought conditions [190,191,192]. There are some safety measures when implanting Au-NPs in plants during drought conditions, such as checking their potential environmental impacts. Scientists are working on Au-NPs for their destiny and build-up in the atmosphere; their impressions on soil and plant systems and their possible threats to non-targeted species are also part of continuing research [193,194]. Au-NPs extracted from plant bioactive compounds have emerged as a potential gizmo for increasing vegetative resilience against dry weather. Their capability to enhance nutrient uptake, anti-oxidative properties, photosynthetic rate, and disease resistance make them cherished for cultivation applications. Furthermore, there is a need for new and entirely understandable research on their mode of action, controlled application procedures, and eco-friendly nature for general approval in drought conditions [195,196,197].

3.3. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-NPs)

Due to their vast characteristics, Fe3O4-NPs are increasingly efficient in agronomy for drought management. These nanoparticles are highly effective and extremely useful for the safety of soil and plants [198]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles are very peculiar for absorbing and adsorbing. They can hold a large amount of water, therefore proving helpful in drought-stressed regions [199]. On the other hand, Fe3O4 nanoparticles provide a protective covering for plants and boost crop quality and yield in drought conditions [200,201]. Most studies have shown that Fe3O4-NPs can hold water in the soil, increase the photosynthetic rate, and reduce water evaporation. This enables plants to grow under drastic environmental conditions. Also, Fe3O4 nanoparticles are environmentally friendly and can manage high drought stresses. One major factor is to sustain a firm basis with non-toxic and biodegradable compounds [29,202,203]. Fe3O4-NPs are also cost-saving and more appealing to farmers for better crop production and development. Concluding the features of Fe3O4-NPs, they may be a promising tool for decreasing drought stress in cultivation systems by providing a safety coating to soil and plants from the atmospheric barriers. These are eco-friendly and money-saving, making them an ideal choice for cultivars in their farming sectors [204,205,206].

3.4. Copper Nanoparticles (Cu-NPs)

In recent years, Cu-NPs have gained attention for their potential use for stress management in the agricultural sector. A particularly significant way is using plants’ bioactive compounds to synthesize Cu-NPs. Thus, their eco-friendly nature provides various beneficial aptitudes to plant crops [80,207]. Previous studies showed that Cu-NPs synthesized from plant materials positively impact the development and growth of plants. Similarly, these proved to be a protector against challenging environmental conditions like dryness in the atmosphere. Case in point, when tomato plants were treated with copper nanoparticles synthesized from the basil leaf extract, Tripathi et al. (2022) unveiled properties like photosynthesis and antioxidant activity under drought conditions [4,208,209]. The presence of nanoparticles acts as a protective shield against oxidation reaction damages produced by unfavorable conditions. Therefore, it helps plants balance optimal metabolic functions and photosynthetic rates during water scarcity [210,211,212].
Moreover, Cu-NPs were found to be valuable in modulating the response of the genes associated with the stress response in plants. It also contributes to their efficiency in fighting against environmental alterations. The gene regulation activity assists plants in activating their stress tolerance mechanism, including the production of proteins and Osmo protectants that aid in cellular protection and water retention [213,214]. For instance, crops treated with Cu-NPs will more likely reveal increased drought resistance by enhancing overall productivity. The eco-friendly and money-saving feature of this green-synthesis method revealed the positive impacts on the development of the plant in stress response conditions and photosynthesis [215,216]. It attracted the attention of researchers and potential enactment in agricultural practices. Cu-NPs have significant attributes in different fields due to their distinctive physiochemical and potential applications [59,217].
Consequently, the typical range of a nanoparticle varies from 1 to 1000 nanometers. It retains exceptional catalytic activity, antimicrobial properties, and electrical and thermal conductivity. There are many ways to synthesize Cu-NPs, such as green synthesis, chemical reduction, and Sono chemical processes posing control over the surface’s shape, size, and functionality to develop their characteristics for specific applications [218,219].
This review article extensively covers diverse applications of copper nanoparticles (Cu-NPs) across various fields. In microchip technology, Cu-NPs find utility as conductive inks for printed electronics and as additives to enhance the performance of electric devices [220,221]. Their inherent ability to combat microbes in the medical sphere positions them as ideal candidates for biomedical and wound-dressing applications. Leveraging the catalytic potential of Cu-NPs in environmental remediation unveils their proficiency in breaking down pollutants and facilitating the safe extraction of heavy metals present in contaminated water sources. Owing to their multifunctional attributes, many possibilities emerge for integrating these nanoparticles into various technologies and industries, catalyzing further research and experimentation [200,203,222].

3.5. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs)

In previous research endeavors, the significant merits of ZnO-NPs extracted from plant materials have garnered attention due to their innovative role in facilitating plant development and their capacity to endure challenging environmental conditions [223,224,225]. Within global warming, heightened concern surrounds the impact of drought stress on the agricultural sector, manifesting as reduced productivity and posing challenges in adequately nourishing the global population [226,227]. For example, an inclusive review by Gupta et al. in 2022 underscored that applying ZnO-NPs to drought-exposed plants elicits heightened plant growth performance rates, concurrently bestowing a spectrum of notable functions. Notably, these nanoparticles facilitate augmentation in chlorophyll content, thereby fostering an upswing in photosynthetic activity [228,229]. Consequently, this augmentation translates to an enhanced energy storage and conservation capacity, even with limited water availability. Applying Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) has been demonstrated to effectively regulate the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase and superoxide dismutase [230,231,232]. These enzymes are crucial in counteracting oxidative damage caused by accumulating reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly under drought-induced conditions. ZnO-NPs function as protective barriers for essential cellular components, enabling plants to withstand the adverse impacts of drought by mitigating oxidative reactions [103,233,234]. Remarkably, ZnO-NPs offer an additional advantage to plants by enhancing their resilience to arid conditions at the molecular level. Despite the direct interaction of nanoparticles with plant cells, they can modulate the expression of stress-responsive genes. This modulation subsequently triggers a cascade of defense mechanisms and adaptable responses, ultimately enhancing the plants’ capacity to tolerate drought [202,210,235]. Notably, the impact of ZnO-NPs on crucial genes associated with the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway, pivotal in plant water stress responses, has been investigated. ZnO-NPs facilitate ABA-dependent pathways, thereby aiding in the closure of stomata. Consequently, this closure reduces water loss through transpiration, conserving water during drought stress [107,236].
Furthermore, ZnO-NPs influence the gene that encodes the enzyme involved in osmotic adjustment and proline biosynthesis. Alterations induced by ZnO-NP applications lead to elevated proline levels, enhancing the plant’s water absorption capability. This augmentation positively affects the plant’s water status and adaptability to drought conditions. A critical perspective to consider is that utilizing ZnO-NPs derived from plants presents an environmentally friendly and ecologically sustainable strategy to mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on agricultural practices [237,238,239]. The multifaceted advantages of ZnO-NPs encompass the enhancement of chlorophyll function and antioxidant enzyme activity and the stimulation of stress-responsive genes, thereby fostering plant development and augmenting drought tolerance [240].

3.6. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs)

TiO2-NPs have demonstrated their potential as beneficial and promising tools in the agricultural domain, primarily due to their positive effects on plant development, growth, and stress tolerance capabilities [241,242]. Like other nanoparticles, TiO2-NPs can be synthesized from plant extracts, revealing noteworthy growth rates, improved photosynthetic plant efficiency, and enhanced antioxidant activities. A specific study involving tomato plants highlighted that applying TiO2-NPs resulted in heightened chlorophyll content, increased biomass, and elevated food production rates under drought conditions with limited water availability [243,244,245]. Furthermore, TiO2-NPs have effectively alleviated oxidative stress conditions caused by environmental adversities. These nanoparticles have shown significant scavenging abilities against reactive oxygen species (ROS), which tend to accumulate in plant tissues during drought conditions, detrimentally impacting plant health, growth, and cellular integrity [246,247]. Salam et al. (2022) reported that treating rice plants with TiO2-NPs reduced ROS levels, enhancing stress tolerance and augmenting crop productivity, particularly in high salinity conditions [248,249]. The multifunctionality of TiO2-NPs within plants positions them as valuable assets for promoting sustainable agricultural growth. These nanoparticles can counteract the adverse effects of abiotic stressors on plant physiology, fostering overall plant health and development [243]. This aspect assumes greater significance in addressing global food security concerns by bolstering the resilience of the agricultural sector. Over time, researchers have gained a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and potential environmental implications of utilizing TiO2-NPs in agronomy [244,250,251]. TiO2-NPs derived from natural plant materials offer promising attributes for enhancing plant growth, fortifying antioxidant defense mechanisms, and optimizing photosynthetic efficiency under stressful conditions.

3.7. Nanoparticle–Plant Interactions: Mechanisms of Uptake, Translocation, and Implications for Agricultural Applications

It is important to note that the scholarly discussion about how nanoparticles enter and move through different crops is based on specific plant species and nanoparticle types, which have already been discussed in a thorough review. The root system is a significant way that nanoparticles can be taken up by more than one crop. When a plant’s roots take Silver Nanoparticles in, they help it take in more water and change how genes that respond to stress work. This happens in plants like Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and Corn (Zea mays L.). Nanoparticles move through plants in two main ways: Apoplastic and symplastic. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots can grow better during drought because of these routes. The leaf can also take in nanoparticles like Titanium Dioxide or Silica through foliar uptake. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants can keep more water and make more food by spraying Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on them as a fog.
The xylem and phloem of plants help nanoparticles move over long distances. Zinc oxide nanoparticles that travel through the xylem to other parts of the plant help control stress hormones and enzymes that fight free radicals. Using nanoparticles like Iron Oxide and Copper Oxide has been shown to improve how well spinach (Spinacia oleracea) uses water and how much chlorophyll it has and to make lettuce (Lactuca sativa) more resistant to water stress. The physicochemical features of the nanoparticles and the environment change how these complicated dynamics work. Silica is found in rice (Oryza sativa). The size and charge on the surface of nanoparticles affect how they are taken in and distributed, making cell walls stiffer and helping them keep water.
Nanoparticle uptake and movement inside the plant depend on the type of nanoparticle and crop type. Nanoparticles like silver, gold, and zinc oxide have been shown to affect Sorghum, Corn, and Wheat differently, depending on whether they are taken in through the roots or the leaves and whether they move through apoplastic or symplastic paths. Scientists from different fields must work together to fully understand how nanoparticles and plants interact. This is because physical and environmental factors also affect this complex interaction. Understanding this is important to make nanoparticles useful in sustainable agriculture and improve risk assessment procedures.
These qualities make them valuable instruments in the field of agronomy. Figure 1 shows that despite these promising results, further research using well-planned experiments is essential to guarantee the safety and efficacy of introducing NPs into agricultural methods [252,253,254].

4. Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Mediated Drought Stress Alleviation

These methods guarantee reproducible, practical, and optimized results. The essential laboratory method of in vitro culture requires a precise sequence of steps [103,255,256]. One must avoid contamination by carefully selecting and sterilizing explants based on plant tissue type. Each plant species has different nutritional needs, so the culture medium includes nutrients, vitamins, and plant growth regulators [257,258]. The explants are first placed on the culture medium, and subculturing ensures growth and differentiation. Shoot, root, and somatic embryo regeneration requires precise hormonal balances. Finally, acclimatization helps regenerated plantlets adjust to life outside the lab. Modern cryopreservation uses multiple methods to preserve plant genetic resources. Most plans use vitrification and controlled freezing. Ice crystals can damage cells, but controlled freezing can reduce them, as shown in Table 5 [210,259,260].
Vitrification prevents ice formation by rapidly cooling water to a glass-like state. Cryopreservation requires pretreatment, dehydration, cryoprotectant exposure, cooling, storage, and recovery. These processes must be balanced to preserve cryopreserved materials [7,275,276]. Many germplasm preservation scenarios are addressed using different methods. Stored cultures are kept at lower temperatures and light levels to slow metabolism. Gel beads or artificial seeds protect explants from drying or damage during encapsulation. As mentioned, cryopreservation allows long-term storage. Tissue culture and field gene banks preserve plant diversity in vitro and in nature [6,277].
Innovation advances these methods while following established procedures ensures confidence in comparisons. Automation, bioreactors, and gene editing revolutionize horticulture [69,278]. Protocols with molecular markers and omics data optimize culture conditions and genetic stability. New horticulture uses complex methods and strategies. They underpin plant propagation, conservation, and biotechnology advances. Researchers and practitioners are about to revolutionize horticulture by combining established protocols with novel approaches to improve plant production, protection, and genetic enhancement, as shown and described in Figure 2 and Table 6 [279,280,281].

4.1. Enhancement of Seed Germination and Seedling Growth

Phyto-synthesized NPs are specifically engineered to regulate seed germination and enhance seed growth during dry weather by facilitating water uptake and modulating osmotic regulations [314]. For example, silver nanoparticles synthesized from plant extracts are pivotal in promoting seed germination and crop growth [315]. The underlying mechanism of these NPs involves nutrient absorption from the soil and subsequent translocation to the plant’s stems, branches, and leaves, even under drought stress. This process aids in osmotic adjustments as well [316]. Despite limited water resources, the nanoparticles expedite water absorption and retention within plant tissues, supporting seed germination and early seedling development.
Furthermore, these nanoparticles contribute to maintaining essential turgor pressure and optimizing cellular functions, which are critical for the survival and progression of plants facing drought-induced conditions. A notable example is the utilization of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) derived from plant extracts. Research confirms that these silver NPs significantly enhance seed germination rates and stimulate seedling growth across various cultivated species when subjected to drought stress [148,317,318]. This observation implies that Ag-NPs hold the potential to serve as a promising tool for enhancing plantlet establishment and initial growth, particularly in regions susceptible to water scarcity or erratic precipitation patterns. While this field of inquiry is still relatively nascent, it is essential to acknowledge the need for additional studies to comprehensively elucidate the fundamental mechanisms and potential environmental consequences associated with using phyto-synthesized NPs to bolster plant growth under drought-induced stress [214,319,320]. Nonetheless, the results are promising and underscore the potential for sustained agronomic improvements that could augment yield productivity in challenging environmental conditions. Continued research efforts and meticulous assessments will be indispensable in fully harnessing the benefits of these innovative NPs for agronomic processes while mitigating potential adverse effects on the environment and human health [321,322].

4.2. Improvement of Water Relations

In recent research, there has been a growing interest in exploring the potential impacts of using phyto-synthesized NPs as an innovative and biodegradable approach to understanding various aspects of plant physiology. This approach becomes particularly relevant when addressing ecological challenges such as water scarcity [323,324]. One particularly dynamic aspect that has garnered considerable attention is the influence of phyto-synthesized NPs on water-related processes within plants. Through strategic utilization of phyto-synthesized NPs, researchers have uncovered compelling evidence of their positive effects on vital water-related pathways [325]. These effects include enhanced water utilization efficiency and the maintenance of turgor pressure within plant cells. Fe3O4-NPs have demonstrated favorable outcomes for strengthening drought-induced water retention in plants. These Fe3O4-NPs can augment hydraulic root conductivity, effectively facilitating the efficient uptake and movement of water throughout the plant structure [251,326].
Consequently, plants treated with Fe3O4-NPs have improved water utilization efficiency, enabling them to manage available water resources effectively, even under drought-stress conditions [202,327]. The implications of these recent findings are both extensive and profound, particularly in the realm of agriculture. Effective water retention can significantly impact crop yield and overall productivity. By harnessing the potential of phyto-synthesized NPs, farmers and agronomists in water-scarce regions could adopt a sustainable and ecologically sound strategy to enhance crop resilience and mitigate the adverse effects of water deficiency. It has the potential to completely transform farming methods, making them resilient even in arid environments [119,328].
However, despite the remarkable outcomes observed, it is essential to acknowledge that the application of phyto-synthesized NPs in plant systems is still developing. Many aspects require further investigation. A comprehensive understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying the interaction between nanoparticles and water is imperative. Furthermore, long-term studies must assess the potential biological effects and unintended consequences of widespread nanoparticle use in agricultural settings [329,330,331]. Nevertheless, these endeavors collectively indicate that phyto-synthesized NPs possess tremendous potential as a cutting-edge and practical approach to addressing plant water stress. As researchers delve deeper into this captivating field of study, it is anticipated that integrating nanotechnology into crop cultivation will contribute to sustainable and robust crop production methodologies, ultimately advancing global initiatives to ensure food security and ecological sustainability. Phyto-synthesized-NPs promise to ameliorate plant–water relations during drought stress by enhancing water utilization efficiency and maintaining turgor pressure/For instance, Fe3O4-NPs have been demonstrated to elevate root hydraulic conductivity and improve water use efficiency in plants subjected to drought stress [115,294,297,298,299].

4.3. Stimulation of Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Content

The stimulation of chlorophyll and photosynthesis within plant cells using phyto-synthesized NPs has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its potential implications for environmental and agricultural sustainability. Photosynthesis is the fundamental process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy, crucial for their growth and development. At the same time, carbon fixation plays a pivotal role in global ecosystems [119,316,328]. During environmental challenges like drought, plants often encounter reduced photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll degradation, leading to diminished growth and productivity. However, research indicates that applying phyto-synthesized NPs can ameliorate these detrimental effects and enhance photosynthetic efficiency [1,2,185,332,333,334].
Moreover, phyto-synthesized NPs possess inherent antioxidant properties, which aid in combating the harmful impacts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that accumulate during drought conditions. ROS can induce oxidative harm to cellular components, including photosynthetic pigments and chloroplasts. By neutralizing the effects of these harmful radicals, NPs can safeguard chlorophyll molecules from degradation and sustain optimal chlorophyll content within plant leaves [316,328,335]. Phyto-synthesized NPs have been found to modulate gene expression associated with photosynthesis, resulting in an upregulation of essential proteins and enzymes responsible for enhancing the photosynthetic rate. This molecular regulation improves photosynthetic efficiency even under adverse environmental conditions [336,337].
Phyto-synthesized NPs, such as ZnO-NPs, affect photosynthesis and chlorophyll levels differently. The outcomes may depend on nanoparticle concentration, size, and the particular plant species under investigation. As a result, further research is essential to elucidate the mechanisms of action of different NPs and their specific interactions with diverse plant systems, thereby enhancing their applications for promoting photosynthesis [156,224,338]. The potential of phyto-synthesized NPs to modulate photosynthesis and improve chlorophyll content holds significant promise for ecologically sustainable agriculture and environmental remediation. By boosting plant growth and stress tolerance, these nanoparticles could mitigate the adverse impacts of water scarcity, climate change, and other ecological challenges on crop yields and environmental well-being. Despite the promising research in the nanoparticle field, comprehensive studies are required to assess the long-term effects, safety considerations, and practical applications of these nanoparticles in real-world agricultural and ecological contexts [202]. Phyto-synthesized NPs can enhance plants’ photosynthesis and chlorophyll content to enhance drought tolerance by optimizing the photosynthetic process and safeguarding chloroplasts against oxidative damage. For instance, ZnO-NPs have been shown to elevate chlorophyll content and improve photosynthetic efficiency in drought-stressed plants [165,320,328].

4.4. Induction of Antioxidant Defense Systems

Researchers have been increasingly interested in exploring the potential of phyto-synthesized NPs to mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on plants. Recent studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of these NPs in inducing antioxidant defense systems in plants [339]. Among the different NPs studied, Au-NPs and TiO2-NPs have shown promising results in enhancing the activities of essential antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), when plants are exposed to drought stress [340,341,342]. The induction of antioxidant defense systems by phyto-synthesized NPs is a significant development in plant stress tolerance research. These NPs help plants counteract the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during drought stress, thereby reducing overall oxidative stress levels [343,344].
Consequently, plants exhibit improved growth, development, and survival even under water-limited supply. The exact mechanisms behind the NPs-induced activation of antioxidant defense systems require further investigation. Nevertheless, the findings indicate promising prospects for developing sustainable strategies to enhance plant drought tolerance [209]. Further research and exploration in this field will likely provide novel insights and practical applications for sustainable crop production and environmental conservation [256,345].

4.5. Regulation of Plant Hormones

Recently, interest in controlling plant hormones with phyto-synthesized NPs to improve plants’ capacity to withstand drought stress has been increasing. Researchers have determined the critical functions of various plant hormones in the responses of plants to stress, including abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonic acid (JA). The amounts of these hormones can be influenced by phyto-synthesized NPs when plants are stressed by drought, potentially causing the plants to respond [256,345,346]. Due to their numerous applications in industries, including agriculture and environmental cleanup, phyto-synthesized NPs have emerged as a promising study field, which also plays a significant role in plant hormonal regulations [3,347,348].
Recently, interest has increased in employing phyto-synthesized NPs to regulate plant hormones and improve plants’ resistance to drought stress. These nanoparticles are made from plant extracts, which serve as sustainable and eco-friendly reducing and stabilizing agents, providing a more environmentally friendly option to conventional chemical processes [67,349]. The passage also emphasizes the crucial functions of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonic acid (JA) as essential participants in how plants react to stress. These phyto-synthesized NPs can remarkably regulate the levels of these hormones in response to drought stress, which may lead to the onset of adaptive responses in plants. Abscisic acid (ABA) has a significant and multifaceted function in how plants respond to stress, particularly in drought-like conditions. Controlling stomata closure, which aids plants in water conservation by lowering transpiration, is one of its primary roles [3,341,345,346,347,348]. When plants are under drought stress, phyto-synthesized NPs can help them conserve water by boosting the levels of ABA. As a signaling molecule, ABA also affects the expression of several genes involved in the stress response. This complex gene regulation system improves the plant’s capacity to withstand and respond to adverse environmental conditions, ultimately fostering drought resistance [28]. Although salicylic acid (SA) is widely established to protect plants from biotic stresses, it has recently attracted interest for its ability to help plants in abiotic and drought stresses [2,3,4,346].
Previous research shows that salicylic acid (SA) protects plants against drought-related damage. It can be affected by phyto-synthesized NPs. For plants to appropriately respond to water constraints, a sophisticated signaling network formed by SA and other stress-related hormones is necessary [5,350]. Jasmonic acid (JA), particularly in drought adaptation, is a crucial aspect of the plant’s toolset for managing stress. A series of reactions brought on by regulating JA levels by phyto-synthesized NPs activate genes and signaling pathways linked to drought responses. As a result, the plant can better manage water scarcity and endure adverse environmental circumstances. A fascinating area of study is the relationship between phyto-synthesized NPs and JA signaling, which has the potential to lead to the development of brand-new, ground-breaking techniques for improving drought tolerance in plants and advancing environmentally friendly farming methods, as shown in Figure 3 [324,351].

5. Plant Proteomics and Gene Expression Regulation of Drought Response by Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles like metal nanoparticles (like Silver Nanoparticles), silicon nanoparticles, and carbon nanoparticles (like Carbon Nanotubes) significantly affect how plants react to drought stress at the molecular level. The complicated chemical processes can be summed up by saying that silver nanoparticles can cause oxidative stress by making ROS. On a molecular level, they may raise the expression of genes that code for antioxidant enzymes like SOD and CAT. This makes these protective proteins more active. Silicon nanoparticles interact with guard cells in the stomata. At the level of molecules, this exchange can change how ion channels work and signals are sent. This can lead to better control of the stomata and less water loss. At the molecular level, carbon nanoparticles, especially carbon nanotubes, can stimulate the production of genes that respond to stress. They may increase the activity of transcription factors like DREB and MYB, which then turn on genes that help the cell deal with stress.
The effect of nanoparticles on plants’ proteome and gene expression during drought stress is an important research topic. Intricate molecular modifications, such as those affecting nano clays, nano iron oxide, and nano-silica, are essential to understanding these effects. Nano clays, for instance, have been shown to alter proteomes in plants. The overexpression of stress-related proteins such as LEA and chaperones may be involved at the molecular level. Protein modifications like this aid plants in resisting the cellular stress brought on by drought. Nano-sized iron oxide particles change the way soil absorbs nutrients. This may entail alterations in the expression of genes involved in nutrition transport and assimilation at the molecular level. This guarantees that plants can obtain the nutrients they need despite poor conditions. Potential epigenetic alterations induced by silica nanoparticles in plants are being studied. Molecular modifications, such as those to DNA methylation and histone acetylation patterns, can have long-term effects on gene expression. Incorporating these case studies of nanoparticles into the headers provides a more nuanced understanding of the molecular-level interactions between nanoparticles and plants. Stress from drought has caused this. This has ramifications for various physiological processes and adaptive behaviors in plants.

6. Potential Risks and Challenges Associated with the Use of Phyto-Synthesized NPs in Agriculture

Using various phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture provides exciting opportunities to increase crop yield and advance sustainable farming. However, the promise also raises significant issues that we must deliberately address. Concerns about their possible environmental impact and potential harm to organisms that are not their targets are among the main ones [119,352]. Conducting in-depth studies and implementing efficient laws to ensure safe and responsible use is critical. Investigating the long-term impacts of these nanoparticles on soil health and the emergence of resistance in agricultural systems is also necessary [60,353,354].
Moreover, we must consider how small-scale farmers can use and finance this technology and the importance of public perception and education for its widespread acceptance. Phyto-synthesized NPs can be beneficial in developing sustainable agriculture by proactively resolving these issues and encouraging ethical behaviors. To maximize the potential of this novel farming strategy, a balance must be struck between utilizing their advantages and reducing potential risks and challenges, while employing mitigation strategies of using phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture (Table 7) [119,355,356,357].

6.1. Toxicisty to Non-Target Organisms

As a popular choice for agricultural usage, phyto-synthesized NPs have attracted considerable attention for their promising capacity to increase plant growth and stress tolerance. As with any new technology, properly assessing dangers posed to agroecosystem non-target creatures is crucial [370]. Responsible use of these phyto-synthesized NPs in agricultural techniques requires weighing their potential advantages against the need to protect the ecosystem. Because of their tiny size and unique features, nanoparticles can interact with living systems differently than larger particles or bulk materials, which raises concerns [371]. When used in farming environments, phyto-synthesized NPs may be ingested by plants and then transferred through the food chain to other creatures, including unintended ones. This prospect necessitates careful investigation and assessment of the potential effects on the ecology of employing these nanoparticles in agriculture [372]. For this technology to be used responsibly and sustainably, it is imperative to understand how these nanoparticles function in living systems. These nanoparticles can have a variety of consequences on species that are not their intended targets, depending on their composition, concentration, and duration of exposure. The overall productivity and sustainability of the agroecosystem might be disrupted, for instance, if soil microorganisms that are crucial for nutrient cycling and soil health are adversely impacted [373].
Similarly, beneficial insects that act as pollinators or natural predators of pests may suffer direct or indirect effects from coming into contact with these nanoparticles. To ensure responsible use in agriculture and safeguard the delicate ecosystem balance, we evaluate these potential effects. Further investigation is required to fully assess the possible toxicity of phyto-synthesized NPs to non-target organisms to ensure their safe and responsible use in agriculture. Before adopting large-scale applications, it is crucial to conduct risk assessments, carefully weighing both the short- and long-term repercussions [114,374,375,376,377]. Measures should be taken to reduce any dangers to achieve a balance between using phyto-synthesized NPs advantages for plant development and stress tolerance and safeguarding the agroecosystem’s fragile ecological balance. To achieve this equilibrium, eco-friendly behaviors must be emphasized. By adopting a cautious and informed approach, we can protect the environment and non-target creatures while ensuring that using various phyto-synthesized nanoparticles in agriculture is both efficient and sustainable [374,375,378].

6.2. Impact of Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles on Water Tables and Groundwater Quality in Agriculture

The widespread use of Phyto-synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) in agricultural activities may significantly affect water tables and groundwater quality. A study on their use in agriculture highlights the possible impact of phyto-synthesized NPs on groundwater levels. This has significant consequences for the future of agricultural water supplies [323]. Long-term exposure of agricultural areas to these nanoparticles raises serious concerns because of the potential for their penetration into the soil and subsequent leaching into groundwater. Subterranean particle movement and behavior may be affected by the introduction of phyto-synthesized NPs, which may change the soil’s physicochemical features [374]. This phenomenon’s possible influence on groundwater quality is the most pressing concern. Water chemistry may be altered due to interactions between these nanoparticles and minerals and organic matter in the soil as they move through the soil profile [379]. Groundwater quality in these agricultural regions may suffer significantly if these changes are allowed to occur. A further concern is that nanoparticles in groundwater may upset the equilibrium of microbial communities in aquifers. In groundwater ecosystems, microorganisms are crucial to nutrient cycling and water filtration [380]. These vital ecosystem services may be compromised by the persistence of NPs in these habitats, reducing microbial diversity and abundance. A thorough evaluation of the possible impact on water tables and groundwater quality is necessary since phyto-synthesized NPs show promise in many agricultural applications, such as crop protection and nitrogen control [381]. Careful risk assessment and management are essential for the benefits of NP used to outweigh the hazards they cause to water supplies and the environment [382]. A careful equilibrium between utilizing the benefits of phyto-synthesized NPs and protecting the stability of water tables and groundwater quality in agricultural regions is required to promote responsible and sustainable farming activities [383,384,385].

6.3. Environmental Fate and Transport

Due to their rising utilization and potential ecological effects, there has been a significant interest in researching the environmental fate and transportation of phyto-synthesized NPs in recent years. Understanding how phyto-synthesized NPs act in the environment becomes crucial to judging potential hazards [386]. According to previous studies, phyto-synthesized NPs can penetrate the soil profile and even reach subsurface water reservoirs. Further worries regarding water pollution are raised because they have access to numerous water bodies. For informed application decisions and to ensure the protection of our natural resources, it is crucial to comprehend how these nanoparticles behave in the environment. Numerous factors affect phyto-synthesized NPs’ rate and transport, such as their stability, surface charge, and physicochemical properties [387].
Moreover, ecological conditions, including pH levels, soil type, and moisture content, play an essential role in their performance. Though nanoparticles move through diverse environmental situations, they can intermingle with many other organisms and are also interlinked with biochemical processes, promoting potential ecosystem modifications [388]. Notwithstanding the critical development in this field, holes linger in our understanding of the long-lasting performance and probable impacts of phyto-synthesized NPs in the environment. Additional widespread studies are required to determine their future, relations, and perseverance on different environmental grounds. This evidence is important for emerging actual danger calculations and managing policies to defend living organisms and the environment from harmful things allied with the practice of phyto-synthesized NPs [103,106,283].

7. Future Research Directions and Recommendations

Future research on phyto-synthesized NPs has enormous promise for improving agriculture and tackling issues with global food security. These nanoparticles, made from plant extracts, have the extraordinary potential to encourage plant growth, increase stress tolerance, and improve nutrient intake. We must examine numerous critical research paths and suggestions before profiting from these phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture [185,332,386].

7.1. Optimizing the Synthesis and Application of Phyto-Synthesized NPs

The development of phyto-synthesized NP synthesis is a significant topic that needs more study. Although a method for producing these nanoparticles currently exists, scientists should concentrate on developing more effective, stable, and environmentally acceptable agricultural versions [389]. To do this, we must investigate fresh ideas and strategies for optimizing the synthesis procedure to produce higher yields and higher-caliber nanoparticles. It would also be very beneficial to research how various elements, such as plant species, extract concentrations, and reaction circumstances, affect the synthesis of NPs. We may streamline the procedure and ensure we consistently and reliably create these nanoparticles for agricultural use consistently and reliably by comprehending these elements [83]. Understanding how phyto-synthesized NPs promote plant growth and stress tolerance is another crucial topic that requires research. Our main goal should be to study the interactions between these nanoparticles and plant cells and how they affect different physiological and biochemical pathways. This understanding allows us to create nanoparticles suited for various applications [16]. Scientists can use cutting-edge approaches, including genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, to explore the complex molecular processes of boosting plants with NPs. It is critical to evaluate the potential environmental effects of phyto-synthesized NPs because their use in agriculture is growing. As we investigate more extensive services for these nanoparticles in farming and other processes, we must ensure they are secure and sustainable [390].
Further research is required to evaluate the effects of these nanoparticles on soil health, water purity, and other ecosystem creatures that are not the primary targets. Scientists may ensure that using phyto-synthesized NPs is consistent with sustainable agriculture methods and prevents unintentional ecological disruptions by understanding the broader ecological ramifications. It is also critical to address the issue of scaling up nanoparticle production [391]. A more profound knowledge of these nanoparticles’ benefits and limitations can be attained by assessing how well they perform regarding crop output, nutrient uptake, and stress resistance in various environmental settings and farming methods. Farmers and politicians who want to include phyto-synthesized NPs in their agricultural practices might benefit significantly from the findings of these comparative studies as excellent recommendations [80,330].

7.2. Elucidating the Mechanisms of Action of Phyto-Synthesized NPs

In recent years, phyto-synthesized NPs have gained recognition as a promising approach for transforming agriculture by enhancing plant development and stress tolerance. The sustainable green synthesis of NPs using plant molecules efficiently replaces conventional chemical processes. Phyto-synthesized NPs hold much promise, but it is essential to comprehend the intricate mechanisms underlying their beneficial effects on plants. According to recent studies, creating nanoparticles from metal ions involves using various plant parts, including leaves, roots, stems, and flowers [358,360,361]. These plant extracts contain a variety of phytochemicals, including flavonoids, polyphenols, alkaloids, and proteins, which function as reducing and stabilizing agents to create NPs with distinctive physicochemical properties. These NPs may easily be absorbed by plant tissues after being generated, either through root absorption or foliar application, and then transported to various plant organs where they exert their positive effects. According to studies, the phyto-synthesized (NP) size, shape, and surface charge are crucial factors in cellular internalization and the reactions that follow in plant cells [156,338,343,344].
Plant growth and development are facilitated by the modulation of various physiological and biochemical processes at the cellular level by phyto-synthesized NPs. Phyto-synthesized NPs, for instance, can boost root and shoot length, accumulate biomass, and encourage overall plant growth, among other things. The presence of phyto-synthesized NPs in the rhizosphere also affects root architecture by encouraging the development of lateral roots and the proliferation of root hairs, improving nutrient and water uptake efficiency. Additionally, phyto-synthesized NPs have been shown to modify the activity of enzymes involved in antioxidant defense mechanisms, reducing the cellular damage brought on by oxidative stress. Plants treated with NPs, therefore, show increased resistance to abiotic stressors like drought, salt, heavy metal toxicity, and temperature fluctuations [119,202,326,327].
Additionally, plants exposed to NPs have demonstrated improved resistance to various biotic stressors, including infections caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Understanding these cellular reactions to optimize NP applications in agriculture and customize them to particular crop and stress settings is essential. Furthermore, the signaling pathways in plants activated by phyto-synthesized NPs are also interesting [309,311].

7.3. Investigating Long-Term Effects and Potential Risks

Long-term research is essential to fully evaluate the possible dangers related to the use of phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture. While this preliminary study suggests that phyto-synthesized NPs have positive benefits, further research is necessary to identify any unforeseen effects that might develop in the future. These in-depth investigations ought to concentrate on assessing how phyto-synthesized NPs affect the health of the soil, unintended organisms, and the functioning of the ecosystem as a whole. It is crucial to comprehend how phyto-synthesized NPs affect the condition of the soil. As the foundation of agricultural systems, soils support plant development and the cycling of nutrients [6,322,332]. Although preliminary findings may point to beneficial effects on soil properties, such as increased nutrient availability or improved water retention, prolonged exposure may change the soil’s microbial community and nutrient dynamics, impacting crop productivity and soil fertility [25]. Ag-NP treatments had positive short-term effects on some soil parameters. Still, long-term exposure led to decreased soil microbial diversity and altered enzyme activity, raising concerns about the long-term health and fertility of the soil [85]. Long-term studies must include an analysis of the impact of phyto-synthesized NPs on non-target organisms in the agroecosystem. These species—beneficial insects, pollinators, earthworms, and other fauna—are crucial for maintaining ecological balance [77]. The possible influence of phyto-synthesized NPs on the general health of ecosystems must also be considered in long-term investigations.
Plants, animals, microbes, and abiotic elements interact in intricate networks in agricultural systems. Introducing new materials, such as NPs, into these systems may upset the delicate balance of ecosystem dynamics [316]. Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) made from plant extracts were the subject of a ten-year study by Qamer et al. (2021) that examined how they affected an agricultural ecosystem. The study found that while CuO-NPs initially increased agrarian yields, prolonged exposure caused changes in soil microbial communities, decreased plant variety, and impacted insect populations, which reduced the resilience of the ecosystem as a whole [119,330,392]. Long-term research should consider and propose mitigation measures to mitigate negative impacts and assure sustainable usage of phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture in light of these potential dangers. Based on the study’s findings, specific tactics might be suggested, including implementing buffer zones, optimizing NP application rates, and choosing plant species with a low environmental impact. Phyto-synthesized NPs can be used responsibly and intelligently to the fullest extent possible to develop resilient and environmentally friendly agricultural systems [330].

7.4. Developing Guidelines and Regulations for the Safe Use of Phyto-Synthesized NPs in Agriculture

Due to its potential to drastically improve crop productivity and pest control, phyto-synthesized NPs have attracted much interest in the agricultural sector. These phyto-synthesized NPs are environmentally friendly substitutes for typical chemical inputs because they utilize environmentally friendly processes incorporating plant extracts [80]. Despite their apparent benefits, their extensive usage raises questions about potential environmental and public health hazards, demanding detailed policies and regulations for sustainable and safe use. One of the leading ecological hazards is the possible buildup of phyto-synthesized NPs in the soil, which may impact soil health and microbial communities [393]. Another concern is the runoff of NPs into water bodies, which could cause aquatic toxicity and disturb marine ecosystems.
Additionally, a careful examination of phyto-synthesized NPs’ effects on non-target organisms, such as beneficial insects and birds, is necessary to guarantee their safety. Occupational exposure for farmers and agricultural employees who handle NPs during application is the primary source of worry regarding human health. In addition, concerns about food safety are raised by the possibility that NPs could be absorbed by crops and then enter the food chain [394]. Furthermore, one factor that must be carefully considered to protect public health is indirect exposure to consumers who consume treated crops or food items. It is crucial to design efficient solutions to reduce these hazards. One strategy specifies safe dosages and application rates for phyto-synthesized NPs. Maximum levels of NPs that can be used in agriculture must be set so that crops, the earth, and the environment do not take damage in ways that were not expected [320,328,332].
Additionally, adding phyto-synthesized NPs to current Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques can lower overall chemical inputs and improve those chemicals and responsible applications. The monitoring protocol implementation is essential for the ongoing evaluation of phyto-synthesized NP dispersion and potential environmental effects. Regular soil, water, and air quality monitoring are required to track NP distribution and fate in agricultural environments. Important information on the presence and potential effects of phyto-synthesized NPs will also be provided by biomonitoring studies that examine the accumulation of NPs in plants and other non-target organisms [15,395]. Rigorous risk assessment frameworks must be used in addition to monitoring to assess the possible threats to the environment and public health posed by phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture. Standardized methods for phyto-synthesized NP exposure evaluation can aid in evaluating the effects of NPs on ecosystems.
In contrast, in-depth assessments of the possible health concerns of NP exposure for consumers, agricultural workers, and farmers should be conducted. Phyto-synthesized NPs show great promise as environmentally beneficial agrarian solutions. However, their responsible adoption necessitates the creation of thorough rules and regulations [13,14,396]. The agricultural sector can take advantage of the advantages of nanotechnology while preserving the environment and public health by addressing potential environmental and human health risks by establishing appropriate application rates, monitoring protocols, and conducting thorough risk assessments [12,397].

8. Conclusions

Encouraging outcomes for the use of phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture have been shown to reduce the negative impacts of drought stress on food crops. The importance of green synthesis techniques, which use plant extracts to create nanoparticles, has been highlighted in this review as an economical and environmentally responsible technique. The many uses of phyto-produced NPs, including Ag-NPs, Au-NPs, Fe3O4 NPs, Cu-NPs, ZnO-NPs, and TiO2-NPs, have shown their potential to improve plant growth and biochemical characteristics under drought-stress conditions. According to the results of numerous research studies, phyto-synthesized NPs can significantly enhance seed germination and seedling growth, control water relations, promote photosynthesis, increase chlorophyll content, and activate antioxidant defense mechanisms in plants under drought stress. Additionally, these nanoparticles’ control of plant hormones offers a valuable defense against the effects of drought stress and raises agricultural output. However, it is essential to consider the dangers and difficulties that could arise from using phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture. The toxicity of these nanoparticles to non-target organisms and their possible effects on soil health must be carefully considered. To avoid any adverse impact on ecosystems, it is crucial to comprehend the environmental destiny and transit of these phyto-synthesized NPs. Future research should concentrate on refining synthesis processes to boost nanoparticle stability and bioavailability to ensure the safe and efficient deployment of phyto-synthesized NPs in agriculture.
Furthermore, it is critical to obtain a more precise knowledge of the underlying mechanisms through which these phyto-synthesized NPs affect plants. Long-term research is required to evaluate the persistence and potential cumulative impacts of phyto-synthesized NPs in agroecosystems. Creating detailed policies and regulations for using phyto-synthesized NPs ethically in agriculture is crucial. By doing this, it will be possible to optimize positive effects while limiting negative ones on the environment, non-target creatures, and human health. Especially in drought-stressed settings, incorporating phyto-synthesized NPs in agricultural techniques holds considerable promise for sustainable crop production. To fully realize the potential of these cutting-edge nanomaterials in agriculture for a robust and secure future of food, however, more research, risk analysis, and policy implementation are required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W. and M.M.; software, A.W., R.M.M. and W.Z.; validation, A.W., F.B. and W.Z.; resources, M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W., M.M., F.B. and W.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.W., M.M. and W.Z.; visualization, A.W., M.N. and M.M; supervision, W.Z. and A.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yasmeen, S.; Wahab, A.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Qureshi, K.A.; Jaremko, M. Melatonin as a foliar application and adaptation in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) crops under drought stress. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wahab, A.; Abdi, G.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Ullah, S.; Shah, W.; Mumtaz, S.; Yasin, G.; Muresan, C.C.; Marc, R.A. Plants’ physio-biochemical and phyto-hormonal responses to alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress: A comprehensive review. Plants 2022, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.-K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tripathi, D.; Singh, M.; Pandey-Rai, S. Crosstalk of nanoparticles and phytohormones regulate plant growth and metabolism under abiotic and biotic stress. Plant Stress 2022, 6, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mozafari, A.A.; Havas, F.; Ghaderi, N. Application of iron nanoparticles and salicylic acid in in vitro culture of strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to cope with drought stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC 2018, 132, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kamińska, M.; Gołębiewski, M.; Tretyn, A.; Trejgell, A. Efficient long-term conservation of Taraxacum pieninicum synthetic seeds in slow growth conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC 2018, 132, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bissoyi, A.; Kumar, A.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Nesmelov, A.; Gusev, O.; Patra, P.K.; Bit, A. Recent advances and future direction in lyophilisation and desiccation of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 3604203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Paidari, S.; Ibrahim, S.A. Potential application of gold nanoparticles in food packaging: A mini review. Gold Bull. 2021, 54, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Silva, L.F.; Santosh, M.; Schindler, M.; Gasparotto, J.; Dotto, G.L.; Oliveira, M.L.; Hochella Jr, M.F. Nanoparticles in fossil and mineral fuel sectors and their impact on environment and human health: A review and perspective. Gondwana Res. 2021, 92, 184–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Verma, R.; Pathak, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Prawer, S.; Tomljenovic-Hanic, S. ZnO nanomaterials: Green synthesis, toxicity evaluation and new insights in biomedical applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Virmani, K.; Deepak, C.; Sharma, S.; Chadha, U.; Selvaraj, S.K. Nanomaterials for automotive outer panel components: A review. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Greuning, H.; Bratanovic, S.B. Analyzing Banking Risk: A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Risk Management; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vogt, J.V.; Naumann, G.; Masante, D.; Spinoni, J.; Cammalleri, C.; Erian, W.; Pischke, F.; Pulwarty, R.; Barbosa, P. Drought Risk Assessment and Management: A Conceptual Framework; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schrieks, T.; Botzen, W.W.; Wens, M.; Haer, T.; Aerts, J.C. Integrating behavioral theories in agent-based models for agricultural drought risk assessments. Front. Water 2021, 3, 686329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Falkenberg, T.; Ekesi, S.; Borgemeister, C. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and One Health–A call for action to integrate. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2022, 53, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ebrahimi, A.; Samari, F.; Eftekhar, E.; Yousefinejad, S. Rapid and efficient colorimetric sensing of clindamycin and Fe3+ using controllable phyto-synthesized silver/silver chloride nanoparticles by Syzygium cumini fruit extract. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pattanayak, D.S.; Pal, D.; Thakur, C.; Raut, P.; Wasewar, K. Catalytic potential of phyto-synthesized silver nanoparticles for the degradation of pollutants. In Sustainable Engineering, Energy, and the Environment; Apple Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 465–481. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahluwalia, O.; Singh, P.C.; Bhatia, R. A review on drought stress in plants: Implications, mitigation and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Resour. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 5, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, S.; Husen, A. Role of nanomaterials in the mitigation of abiotic stress in plants. In Nanomaterials and Plant Potential; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 441–471. [Google Scholar]
  20. Alagoz, S.M.; Arvanaghi, H.R.; Dolatabadi, N.; Khalaki, M.A.; Moameri, M.; Lajayer, B.A.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Impact on nutritional status of plants treated with nanoparticles. In Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 333–358. [Google Scholar]
  21. Farooq, M.A.; Hannan, F.; Islam, F.; Ayyaz, A.; Zhang, N.; Chen, W.; Zhang, K.; Huang, Q.; Xu, L.; Zhou, W. The potential of nanomaterials for sustainable modern agriculture: Present findings and future perspectives. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 1926–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Das, P.P.; Singh, K.R.; Nagpure, G.; Mansoori, A.; Singh, R.P.; Ghazi, I.A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, J. Plant-soil-microbes: A tripartite interaction for nutrient acquisition and better plant growth for sustainable agricultural practices. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mittal, U.; Kumar, V.; Kukreja, S.; Singh, B.; Pandey, N.K.; Goutam, U. Role of beneficial elements in developing resilience to abiotic and biotic stresses in plants: Present status and future prospects. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 3789–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Malik, S.; Chaudhary, K.; Malik, A.; Punia, H.; Sewhag, M.; Berkesia, N.; Nagora, M.; Kalia, S.; Malik, K.; Kumar, D.; et al. Superabsorbent Polymers as a Soil Amendment for Increasing Agriculture Production with Reducing Water Losses under Water Stress Condition. Polymers 2022, 15, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patra, S.K.; Poddar, R.; Brestic, M.; Acharjee, P.U.; Bhattacharya, P.; Sengupta, S.; Pal, P.; Bam, N.; Biswas, B.; Barek, V.; et al. Prospects of hydrogels in agriculture for enhancing crop and water productivity under water deficit condition. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 2022, 4914836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ray, S.S.; Soni, R.; Kim, I.-C.; Park, Y.-I.; Lee, C.Y.; Kwon, Y.-N. Surface innovation for fabrication of superhydrophobic sand grains with improved water holding capacity for various environmental applications. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Linh, T.M.; Mai, N.C.; Hoe, P.T.; Lien, L.Q.; Ban, N.K.; Hien, L.T.T.; Chau, N.H.; Van, N.T. Metal-based nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in soybean. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 4056563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhou, P.; Wu, Z.; Lou, B.; Jiang, Y.; Shakoor, N.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; et al. Engineered Zn-based nano-pesticides as an opportunity for treatment of phytopathogens in agriculture. NanoImpact 2022, 28, 100420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sarkar, M.; Paul, A.; Das, D.R. Availing engineered and biosynthesized metal-based nanoparticles to alleviate abiotic stress. In Response of Field Crops to Abiotic Stress; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 15–33. [Google Scholar]
  30. Azameti, M.K.; Imoro, A.-W.M. Nanotechnology: A promising field in enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Crop Des. 2023, 100037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zarebanadkouki, M.; Hosseini, B.; Gerke, H.H.; Schaller, J. Amorphous silica amendment to improve sandy soils’ hydraulic properties for sustained plant root access under drying conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 935012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, L.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Novak, A.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J. Role of biochar in improving sandy soil water retention and resilience to drought. Water 2021, 13, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zia, R.; Nawaz, M.S.; Siddique, M.J.; Hakim, S.; Imran, A. Plant survival under drought stress: Implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ghirardo, A.; Nosenko, T.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Winkler, J.B.; Kruse, J.; Albert, A.; Merl-Pham, J.; Lux, T.; Ache, P.; Zimmer, I.; et al. Protein expression plasticity contributes to heat and drought tolerance of date palm. Oecologia 2021, 197, 903–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jamwal, D.; Sharma, A.; Kanwar, R.; Mehta, S.K. The multifaceted dimensions of potent nanostructures: A comprehensive review. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 2967–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vermoesen, E.; Bodé, S.; Brosens, G.; Boeckx, P.; Van Vlierberghe, S. Chemical Strategies towards Controlled Release in Agriculture. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ramírez-García, R.; Gohil, N.; Singh, V. Recent advances, challenges, and opportunities in bioremediation of hazardous materials. In Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 517–568. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cummings, C.L.; Kuzma, J.; Kokotovich, A.; Glas, D.; Grieger, K. Barriers to responsible innovation of nanotechnology applications in food and agriculture: A study of US experts and developers. NanoImpact 2021, 23, 100326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chelliah, R.; lHasan Madar, I.; Sultan, G.; Begum, M.; Pahi, B.; Tayubi, I.A.; Selvakumar, V.; Oh, D.H. Risk assessment and regulatory decision-making for nanomaterial use in agriculture. In Engineered Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agricultural Production, Soil Improvement and Stress Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 413–430. [Google Scholar]
  40. Renn, O.; Roco, M.C. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. In Emerging Technologies; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2020; pp. 321–359. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Y.; Lu, J.; Cui, L.; Tang, Z.; Ci, D.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Si, T. The multifaceted roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in peanut responses to salt, drought, and cold stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mutale-Joan, C.; Redouane, B.; Najib, E.; Yassine, K.; Lyamlouli, K.; Laila, S.; Zeroual, Y.; Hicham, E.A. Screening of microalgae liquid extracts for their bio stimulant properties on plant growth, nutrient uptake and metabolite profile of Solanum lycopersicum L. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, A.; Choudhary, A.; Kaur, H.; Mehta, S.; Husen, A. Smart nanomaterial and nanocomposite with advanced agrochemical activities. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Djanaguiraman, M.; Nair, R.; Giraldo, J.P.; Prasad, P.V.V. Cerium oxide nanoparticles decrease drought-induced oxidative damage in sorghum leading to higher photosynthesis and grain yield. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 14406–14416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shikari, A.B.; Dikilitas, M.; Simsek, E.; Guldur, M.E.; Simsek, U.; Karakas, S.; Abdel Latef, A.A.H. Nanotechnology and its role in cereal crops under abiotic stress. In Sustainable Remedies for Abiotic Stress in Cereals; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 675–687. [Google Scholar]
  46. Baer, H.A.; Singer, M. The Anthropology of Climate Change: An Integrated Critical Perspective; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomas, A.; Baptiste, A.; Martyr-Koller, R.; Pringle, P.; Rhiney, K. Climate change and small island developing states. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2020, 45, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ebi, K.L.; Vanos, J.; Baldwin, J.W.; Bell, J.E.; Hondula, D.M.; Errett, N.A.; Hayes, K.; Reid, C.E.; Saha, S.; Spector, J.; et al. Extreme weather and climate change: Population health and health system implications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2021, 42, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Teow, S.-Y.; Wong, M.M.-T.; Yap, H.-Y.; Peh, S.-C.; Shameli, K. Bactericidal properties of plants-derived metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs). Molecules 2018, 23, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Monika, P.; Chandraprabha, M. Phytonanotechnology for enhanced wound healing activity. In Functional Bionanomaterials: From Biomolecules to Nanoparticles; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 111–128. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gonçalves, A.C.S.; Ferreira, A.S.M.; Dias, A.; Sárria, M.P.; Gomes, A.C. Nanotechnology-inspired bionanosystems for valorization of natural origin extracts. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 44: Pharmaceutical Technology for Natural Products Delivery Vol. 2 Impact of Nanotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 47–71. [Google Scholar]
  52. Aththanayaka, S.; Thiripuranathar, G.; Ekanayake, S. Emerging advances in biomimetic synthesis of nanocomposites and potential applications. Mater. Today Sustain. 2022, 20, 100206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qamar, O.A.; Jamil, F.; Hussain, M.; Bae, S.; Inayat, A.; Shah, N.S.; Waris, A.; Akhter, P.; Kwon, E.E.; Park, Y.-K. Advances in synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles and their application to biodiesel production: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 460, 141734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chai, W.S.; Cheun, J.Y.; Kumar, P.S.; Mubashir, M.; Majeed, Z.; Banat, F.; Ho, S.-H.; Show, P.L. A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Qadeer, K.; Al-Hinai, A.; Chuah, L.F.; Sial, N.R.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Al Abri, R.; Qyyum, M.A.; Lee, M. Methanol production and purification via membrane-based technology: Recent advancements, challenges, and the way forward. Chemosphere 2023, 335, 139007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shafiq, T.; Uzair, M.; Iqbal, M.J.; Zafar, M.; Hussain, S.J.; Shah, S.A.A. Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Potential in Bio-Medical Applications. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2021, 13, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rónavári, A.; Igaz, N.; Adamecz, D.I.; Szerencsés, B.; Molnar, C.; Kónya, Z.; Pfeiffer, I.; Kiricsi, M. Green silver and gold nanoparticles: Biological synthesis approaches and potentials for biomedical applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aswathi, V.; Meera, S.; Maria, C.A.; Nidhin, M. Green synthesis of nanoparticles from biodegradable waste extracts and their applications: A critical review. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 377–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmed, S.F.; Mofijur, M.; Rafa, N.; Chowdhury, A.T.; Chowdhury, S.; Nahrin, M.; Islam, A.S.; Ong, H.C. Green approaches in synthesising nanomaterials for environmental nanobioremediation: Technological advancements, applications, benefits and challenges. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 111967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chinnathambi, A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Lavarti, R.; Jhanani, G.; On-Uma, R.; Jutamas, K.; Anupong, W. Larvicidal and pupicidal activity of phyto-synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles against dengue vector aedes aegypti. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Salem, S.S.; Fouda, A. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their prospective biotechnological applications: An overview. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 344–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jothinathan, L.; Cai, Q.; Ong, S.; Hu, J. Fe-Mn doped powdered activated carbon pellet as ozone catalyst for cost-effective phenolic wastewater treatment: Mechanism studies and phenol by-products elimination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Paiva-Santos, A.C.; Herdade, A.M.; Guerra, C.; Peixoto, D.; Pereira-Silva, M.; Zeinali, M.; Mascarenhas-Melo, F.; Paranhos, A.; Veiga, F. Plant-mediated green synthesis of metal-based nanoparticles for dermopharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 597, 120311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kumar, A.; Choudhary, A.; Kaur, H.; Mehta, S.; Husen, A. Metal-based nanoparticles, sensors, and their multifaceted application in food packaging. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jeevanandam, J.; Kiew, S.F.; Boakye-Ansah, S.; Lau, S.Y.; Barhoum, A.; Danquah, M.K.; Rodrigues, J. Green approaches for the synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles using microbial and plant extracts. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 2534–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. El-Sheekh, M.M.; El-Kassas, H.Y.; Shams El-Din, N.G.; Eissa, D.I.; El-Sherbiny, B.A. Green synthesis, characterization applications of iron oxide nanoparticles for antialgal and wastewater bioremediation using three brown algae. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2021, 23, 1538–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Devi, D.; Julkapli, N.M.; Sagadevan, S.; Johan, M.R. Eco-friendly green synthesis approach and evaluation of environmental and biological applications of Iron oxide nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 152, 110700. [Google Scholar]
  68. Alprol, A.E.; Mansour, A.T.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; Ashour, M. Algal Extracts for Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Promising Approach for Algae Bioremediation. Materials 2023, 16, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fabris, M.; Abbriano, R.M.; Pernice, M.; Sutherland, D.L.; Commault, A.S.; Hall, C.C.; Labeeuw, L.; McCauley, J.I.; Kuzhiuparambil, U.; Ray, P.; et al. Emerging technologies in algal biotechnology: Toward the establishment of a sustainable, algae-based bioeconomy. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vejan, P.; Khadiran, T.; Abdullah, R.; Ahmad, N. Controlled release fertilizer: A review on developments, applications and potential in agriculture. J. Control. Release 2021, 339, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ren, Y.; Foo, J.J.; Zeng, D.; Ong, W.J. ZnIn2S4-based nanostructures in artificial photosynthesis: Insights into photocatalytic reduction toward sustainable energy production. Small Struct. 2022, 3, 2200017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Daehn, K.; Basuhi, R.; Gregory, J.; Berlinger, M.; Somjit, V.; Olivetti, E.A. Innovations to decarbonize materials industries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 275–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rissman, J.; Bataille, C.; Masanet, E.; Aden, N.; Morrow, W.R., III; Zhou, N.; Elliott, N.; Dell, R.; Heeren, N.; Huckestein, B. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rajivgandhi, G.; Maruthupandy, M.; Quero, F. Investigation of Chitosan/Metal and Metal Oxide Nanocomposites as a New Strategy for Enhanced Anti-Biofilm Efficacy with Reduced Toxicity. In Chitosan Nanocomposites: Bionanomechanical Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 349–375. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mikušová, V.; Mikuš, P. Advances in chitosan-based nanoparticles for drug delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, W.; Li, X.; Cheng, H.; Xia, W. Chitosan-based selenium composites as potent Se supplements: Synthesis, beneficial health effects, and applications in food and agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yew, Y.P.; Shameli, K.; Miyake, M.; Khairudin, N.B.B.A.; Mohamad, S.E.B.; Naiki, T.; Lee, K.X. Green biosynthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite Fe3O4 nanoparticles and biomedical applications in targeted anticancer drug delivery system: A review. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2287–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sur, S.; Rathore, A.; Dave, V.; Reddy, K.R.; Chouhan, R.S.; Sadhu, V. Recent developments in functionalized polymer nanoparticles for efficient drug delivery system. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 20, 100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ikram, M.; Javed, B.; Raja, N.I.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R. Biomedical potential of plant-based selenium nanoparticles: A comprehensive review on therapeutic and mechanistic aspects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Akintelu, S.A.; Oyebamiji, A.K.; Olugbeko, S.C.; Latona, D.F. Green chemistry approach towards the synthesis of copper nanoparticles and its potential applications as therapeutic agents and environmental control. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Taghavizadeh Yazdi, M.E.; Modarres, M.; Amiri, M.S.; Darroudi, M. Phyto-synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aerial extract of Salvia leriifolia Benth and evaluation of their antibacterial and photo-catalytic properties. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2019, 45, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hadinejad, F.; Jahanshahi, M.; Morad, H. Microwave-assisted and ultrasonic phyto-synthesis of copper nanoparticles: A comparison study. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2021, 13, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Samari, F.; Baluchi, L.; Salehipoor, H.; Yousefinejad, S. Controllable phyto-synthesis of cupric oxide nanoparticles by aqueous extract of Capparis spinosa (caper) leaves and application in iron sensing. Microchem. J. 2019, 150, 104158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shahbaz, M.; Fatima, N.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R.; Akram, A.; Haq, E.u.; Mehak, A.; Abasi, F.; Ajmal, M.; Yousaf, T.; Raja, N.I. Effect of Phytosynthesized Selenium and Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against Stripe Rust Disease. Molecules 2022, 27, 8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jan, H.; Zaman, G.; Usman, H.; Ansir, R.; Drouet, S.; Gigliolo-Guivarc’h, N.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Biogenically proficient synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) employing aqueous extract of Aquilegia pubiflora along with their in vitro antimicrobial, anti-cancer and other biological applications. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 950–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pourmadadi, M.; Rahmani, E.; Shamsabadipour, A.; Mahtabian, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Rahdar, A.; Díez-Pascual, A.M. Role of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanocomposites in advanced biomedical applications: A state-of-the-art review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Clasky, A.J.; Watchorn, J.D.; Chen, P.Z.; Gu, F.X. From prevention to diagnosis and treatment: Biomedical applications of metal nanoparticle-hydrogel composites. Acta Biomater. 2021, 122, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Dai, F.; Yuan, M.; Wang, F.; Bai, Y.; Deng, H. Natural polysaccharides based self-assembled nanoparticles for biomedical applications–A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 1240–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ahmad, B.; Shireen, F.; Rauf, A.; Shariati, M.A.; Bashir, S.; Patel, S.; Khan, A.; Rebezov, M.; Khan, M.U.; Mubarak, M.S. Phyto-fabrication, purification, characterisation, optimisation, and biological competence of nano-silver. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Naikoo, G.A.; Mustaqeem, M.; Hassan, I.U.; Awan, T.; Arshad, F.; Salim, H.; Qurashi, A. Bioinspired and green synthesis of nanoparticles from plant extracts with antiviral and antimicrobial properties: A critical review. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2021, 25, 101304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Adrees, M.; Khan, Z.S.; Hafeez, M.; Rizwan, M.; Hussain, K.; Asrar, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ali, S. Foliar exposure of zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and decreased cadmium concentration in grains under simultaneous Cd and water deficient stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Manzoor, N.; Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Shahid, M.; Nazir, M.M.; Ali, L.; Alnusaire, T.S.; Li, B.; Schulin, R.; Wang, G. Iron oxide nanoparticles ameliorated the cadmium and salinity stresses in wheat plants, facilitating photosynthetic pigments and restricting cadmium uptake. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 145221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Singh, A.; Basnal, N.; Shukla, G.; Chaudhary, N.; Singh, S.; Gaurav, S.S. Evaluation of efficacy of Phyto-synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles in contributing drought resilience in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 485101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mosa, W.F.; Behiry, S.I.; Ali, H.M.; Abdelkhalek, A.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, M.M.; Salem, M.Z. Pomegranate trees quality under drought conditions using potassium silicate, nanosilver, and selenium spray with valorization of peels as fungicide extracts. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sun, G.; Dong, Z.; Li, G.; Yuan, H.; Liu, J.; Yao, X.; Gu, J.; Wu, H.; Li, Z. Mn3O4 Nanoparticles Alleviate ROS-Inhibited Root Apex Mitosis Activities to Improve Maize Drought Tolerance. Adv. Biol. 2023, 7, 2200317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wu, D.; Huang, S.; Zhang, X.; Ren, H.; Jin, X.; Gu, C. Iron minerals mediated interfacial hydrolysis of chloramphenicol antibiotic under limited moisture conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 9569–9578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Omar, A.A.; Heikal, Y.M.; Zayed, E.M.; Shamseldin, S.A.; Salama, Y.E.; Amer, K.E.; Basuoni, M.M.; Abd Ellatif, S.; Mohamed, A.H. Conferring of Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Their Response to Selenium Nanoparticles Application. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sardari, M.; Rezayian, M.; Niknam, V. Comparative Study for the Effect of Selenium and Nano-Selenium on Wheat Plants Grown under Drought Stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 69, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Karvar, M.; Azari, A.; Rahimi, A.; Maddah-Hosseini, S.; Ahmadi-Lahijani, M.J. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) enhance drought tolerance and grain yield of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) under deficit irrigation regimes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2022, 44, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hajizadeh, H.S.; Azizi, S.; Rasouli, F.; Okatan, V. Modulation of physiological and biochemical traits of two genotypes of Rosa damascena Mill. by SiO2-NPs under In vitro drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Shibli, R.; Mohusaien, R.; Abu-Zurayk, R.; Qudah, T.; Tahtamouni, R. Silver Nanoparticles (Ag NPs) Boost Mitigation Powers of Chenopodium Quinoa (Q6 Line) Grown under In Vitro Salt-Stressing Conditions. Water 2022, 14, 3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Khattak, A.; Ullah, F.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Mehmood, S. The effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and salicylic acid on growth and biodiesel production potential of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under water stress. Pak. J. Bot 2021, 53, 1987–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kandhol, N.; Jain, M.; Tripathi, D.K. Nanoparticles as potential hallmarks of drought stress tolerance in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Grodetskaya, T.A.; Evlakov, P.M.; Fedorova, O.A.; Mikhin, V.I.; Zakharova, O.V.; Kolesnikov, E.A.; Evtushenko, N.A.; Gusev, A.A. Influence of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles on Gene Expression of Birch Clones In Vitro under Stress Caused by Phytopathogens. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shah, I.H.; Sabir, I.A.; Rehman, A.; Hameed, M.K.; Albashar, G.; Manzoor, M.A.; Shakoor, A. Co-application of copper oxide nanoparticles and Trichoderma harzianum with physiological, enzymatic and ultrastructural responses for the mitigation of salt stress. Chemosphere 2023, 336, 139230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Potter, M.; Deakin, J.; Cartwright, A.; Hortin, J.; Sparks, D.; Anderson, A.J.; McLean, J.E.; Jacobson, A.; Britt, D.W. Absence of nanoparticle-induced drought tolerance in nutrient sufficient wheat seedlings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 13541–13550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Banerjee, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Explicating the cross-talks between nanoparticles, signaling pathways and nutrient homeostasis during environmental stresses and xenobiotic toxicity for sustainable cultivation of cereals. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ali, E.; El-Shehawi, A.M.; Ibrahim, O.; Abdul-Hafeez, E.; Moussa, M.; Hassan, F. A vital role of chitosan nanoparticles in improvisation the drought stress tolerance in Catharanthus roseus (L.) through biochemical and gene expression modulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, X.; Yu, K.; Du, M.; Hu, X.; Li, S.; Tan, W.; Zhang, X. Preparation and application of thidiazuron nanoparticles via electrostatic self-assembly as defoliant in cotton. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 636, 128198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Aarushi, N.K.; Saini, G.; Ram, K. Low water stress induced changes on phenological characteristics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Plant Arch. 2022, 22, 181–183. [Google Scholar]
  111. Li, L.; Xing, J.; Ma, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y. In situ determination of guard cell ion flux underpins the mechanism of ABA-mediated stomatal closure in barley plants exposed to PEG-induced drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 187, 104468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Prakash, V.; Peralta-Videa, J.; Tripathi, D.K.; Ma, X.; Sharma, S. Recent insights into the impact, fate and transport of cerium oxide nanoparticles in the plant-soil continuum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 221, 112403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Vojodi Mehrabani, L.; Badali, R.; Aazami, M.A.; Rasouli, F.; KaKaei, K.; Szczepanek, M. Cerium Oxide Salicylic Acid Nanoparticles’(CeO2: SA-NPs) Foliar Application and In-Soil Animal Manure Use Influence the Growth and Physiological Responses of Aloe vera L. Agronomy 2022, 12, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rai-Kalal, P.; Tomar, R.S.; Jajoo, A. H2O2 signaling regulates seed germination in ZnO nanoprimed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds for improving plant performance under drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fatima, A.; Safdar, N.; Ain, N.-u.; Yasmin, A.; Chaudhry, G.-e.-S. Abscisic Acid-Loaded ZnO Nanoparticles as Drought Tolerance Inducers in Zea mays L. with Physiological and Biochemical Attributes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, M.; Wang, R.; Mur, L.A.J.; Ruan, J.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Functions of silicon in plant drought stress responses. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Akhtar, N.; Ilyas, N.; Hayat, R.; Yasmin, H.; Noureldeen, A.; Ahmad, P. Synergistic effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and silicon dioxide nano-particles for amelioration of drought stress in wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dhanker, R.; Rawat, S.; Chandna, V.; Kumar, R.; Das, S.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, V. Recovery of silver nanoparticles and management of food wastes: Obstacles and opportunities. Environ. Adv. 2022, 9, 100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Abasi, F.; Raja, N.I.; Mashwani, Z.U.R.; Amjad, M.S.; Ehsan, M.; Mustafa, N.; Haroon, M.; Proćków, J. Biogenic silver nanoparticles as a stress alleviator in plants: A mechanistic overview. Molecules 2022, 27, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sani, M.N.H.; Yong, J.W. Harnessing synergistic biostimulatory processes: A plausible approach for enhanced crop growth and resilience in organic farming. Biology 2021, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lynch, J.P. Harnessing root architecture to address global challenges. Plant J. 2022, 109, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Thangagiri, B.; Sivakumar, R. Biochar for toxic chromium removal: Its impacts, mechanism, and future direction. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ibrahim, N.; Hussain, C.M. Green Chemistry for Sustainable Textiles: Modern Design and Approaches; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  124. Elnahal, A.S.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Rady, M.M.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A. The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: A review. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 759–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Liang, X.; Bai, G.; Niu, C.; Feng, Y.; Wei, Z.; Lei, Z.; Chen, K.; Guo, X. Construction of charge-switchable and pH-sensitive carboxymethyl chitosan/Zn2+/heterocycle nanocomposite for the treatment of phytopathogens in agriculture. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 473, 145308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Amna; Ali, B.; Azeem, M.A.; Qayyum, A.; Mustafa, G.; Ahmad, M.A.; Javed, M.T.; Chaudhary, H.J. Bio-fabricated silver nanoparticles: A sustainable approach for augmentation of plant growth and pathogen control. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 53: Nanoparticles: A New Tool to Enhance Stress Tolerance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 345–371. [Google Scholar]
  127. Youssef, A.M.A.E.R. Climate Change and Its Social, Economic, Environmental Implications: Case Study in Egypt. Am. J. Mod. Energy 2022, 8, 43–64. [Google Scholar]
  128. Khan, N.; Ray, R.L.; Kassem, H.S.; Hussain, S.; Zhang, S.; Khayyam, M.; Ihtisham, M.; Asongu, S.A. Potential role of technology innovation in transformation of sustainable food systems: A review. Agriculture 2021, 11, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sarwar, M.; Saleem, M.F.; Ullah, N.; Khan, M.J.; Maqsood, H.; Ahmad, H.; Tanveer, A.; Shahid, M. Silver nanoparticles protect tillering in drought-stressed wheat by improving leaf water relations and physiological functioning. Funct. Plant Biol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Khan, S.; Zahoor, M.; Khan, R.S.; Ikram, M.; Islam, N.U. The impact of silver nanoparticles on the growth of plants: The agriculture applications. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Roychoudhury, A.; Sarkar, S.; Chakraborty, S. Fungal-mediated synthesis of gold and titanium nanoparticles and their application in agriculture. In Myconanotechnology and Application of Nanoparticles in Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Wang, P.; Yin, H. Nanoparticles in Plants: Uptake, Transport and Physiological Activity in Leaf and Root. Materials 2023, 16, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Waqas Mazhar, M.; Ishtiaq, M.; Hussain, I.; Parveen, A.; Hayat Bhatti, K.; Azeem, M.; Thind, S.; Ajaib, M.; Maqbool, M.; Sardar, T.; et al. Seed nano-priming with Zinc Oxide nanoparticles in rice mitigates drought and enhances agronomic profile. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Ghani, M.I.; Saleem, S.; Rather, S.A.; Rehmani, M.S.; Alamri, S.; Rajput, V.D.; Kalaji, H.M.; Saleem, N.; Sial, T.A.; Liu, M. Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An effective strategy to mitigate drought stress in cucumber seedling by modulating antioxidant defense system and osmolytes accumulation. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sreelakshmi, B.; Induja, S.; Adarsh, P.; Rahul, H.; Arya, S.; Aswana, S.; Haripriya, R.; Aswathy, B.; Manoj, P.; Vishnudasan, D. Drought stress amelioration in plants using green synthesised iron oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 41, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Giglou, M.T.; Giglou, R.H.; Esmaeilpour, B.; Azarmi, R.; Padash, A.; Falakian, M.; Śliwka, J.; Gohari, G.; Lajayer, H.M. A new method in mitigation of drought stress by chitosan-coated iron oxide nanoparticles and growth stimulant in peppermint. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 187, 115286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shah, A.A.; Yasin, N.A.; Mudassir, M.; Ramzan, M.; Hussain, I.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Ali, H.M.; Shabbir, Z.; Ali, A.; Ahmed, S.; et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles and selenium supplementation improve growth and photosynthesis by modulating antioxidant system and gene expression of chlorophyll synthase (CHLG) and protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) in arsenic-stressed Cucumis melo. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 307, 119413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mustafa, H.; Ilyas, N.; Akhtar, N.; Raja, N.I.; Zainab, T.; Shah, T.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, P. Biosynthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and its effects along with calcium phosphate on physicochemical attributes of wheat under drought stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, 112519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Amjad, S.; Tiwari, S.; Serajuddin, M. Applications of Nanobiotechnology in overcoming drought stress in crops. In Nanobiotechnology: Mitigation of Abiotic Stress in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 399–415. [Google Scholar]
  140. Karvar, M.; Azari, A.; Rahimi, A.; Maddah-Hosseini, S.; Ahmadi-Lahijani, M.J. Potassium silicate reduces water consumption, improves drought tolerance, and enhances the productivity of sweet corn (Zea mays) under deficit irrigation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mohammadi, M.H.Z.; Panahirad, S.; Navai, A.; Bahrami, M.K.; Kulak, M.; Gohari, G. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2-NPs) improve growth parameters and antioxidant defense system in Moldavian Balm (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) under salinity stress. Plant Stress 2021, 1, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Liu, Y.; Cao, X.; Yue, L.; Wang, C.; Tao, M.; Wang, Z.; Xing, B. Foliar-applied cerium oxide nanomaterials improve maize yield under salinity stress: Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and rhizobacteria regulation. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 299, 118900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Elshayb, O.M.; Nada, A.M.; Sadek, A.H.; Ismail, S.H.; Shami, A.; Alharbi, B.M.; Alhammad, B.A.; Seleiman, M.F. The integrative effects of biochar and ZnO nanoparticles for enhancing rice productivity and water use efficiency under irrigation deficit conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Al-Juthery, H.W.; Lahmod, N.R.; Al-Taee, R.A. Intelligent, nano-fertilizers: A new technology for improvement nutrient use efficiency (article review). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 735, 012086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Nazir, M.M.; Noman, M.; Ahmed, T.; Ali, S.; Ulhassan, Z.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, G. Exogenous calcium oxide nanoparticles alleviate cadmium toxicity by reducing Cd uptake and enhancing antioxidative capacity in barley seedlings. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mazhar, M.W.; Ishtiaq, M.; Maqbool, M.; Akram, R. Seed priming with Calcium oxide nanoparticles improves germination, biomass, antioxidant defence and yield traits of canola plants under drought stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Patel, A.; Patel, N.; Ali, A.; Alim, H. Interaction Between Metal Oxide Nanoparticles and PGPR on Plant Growth and Development. In Nanomaterials for Environmental and Agricultural Sectors; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 221–238. [Google Scholar]
  148. Naseer, I.; Javad, S.; Singh, A.; Maqsood, S.; Iqbal, S.; Jabeen, K. Alleviation Mechanism of Drought Stress in Plants Using Metal Nanoparticles–A Perspective Analysis. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 53: Nanoparticles: A New Tool to Enhance Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 115–149. [Google Scholar]
  149. Dola, D.B.; Mannan, M.A.; Sarker, U.; Mamun, M.A.A.; Islam, T.; Ercisli, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Pop, O.L.; Marc, R.A. Nano-iron oxide accelerates growth, yield, and quality of Glycine max seed in water deficits. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 992535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Lau, S.-E.; Hamdan, M.F.; Pua, T.-L.; Saidi, N.B.; Tan, B.C. Plant nitric oxide signaling under drought stress. Plants 2021, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zahedi, S.M.; Hosseini, M.S.; Daneshvar Hakimi Meybodi, N.; Peijnenburg, W. Mitigation of the effect of drought on growth and yield of pomegranates by foliar spraying of different sizes of selenium nanoparticles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5202–5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zohra, E.; Ikram, M.; Omar, A.A.; Hussain, M.; Satti, S.H.; Raja, N.I.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R.; Ehsan, M. Potential applications of biogenic selenium nanoparticles in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants: A comprehensive insight on the mechanistic approach and future perspectives. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 456–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pirtarighat, S.; Ghannadnia, M.; Baghshahi, S. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ocimum basilicum cultured under controlled conditions for bactericidal application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Rasaee, I.; Ghannadnia, M.; Baghshahi, S. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Satureja hortensis treated with NaCl and its antibacterial properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 264, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Vishwanath, R.; Negi, B. Conventional and green methods of synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antimicrobial properties. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A. Plant response to silver nanoparticles: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 973–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Danish, M.; Shahid, M.; Ahamad, L.; Raees, K.; Atef Hatamleh, A.; Al-Dosary, M.A.; Mohamed, A.; Al-Wasel, Y.A.; Singh, U.B.; Danish, S. Nano-pesticidal potential of Cassia fistula (L.) leaf synthesized silver nanoparticles (Ag@ Cf L-NPs): Deciphering the phytopathogenic inhibition and growth augmentation in Solanum lycopersicum (L.). Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 985852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sonawane, H.; Shelke, D.; Chambhare, M.; Dixit, N.; Math, S.; Sen, S.; Borah, S.N.; Islam, N.F.; Joshi, S.J.; Yousaf, B.; et al. Fungi-derived agriculturally important nanoparticles and their application in crop stress management–Prospects and environmental risks. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Singh, N.B.; Chaudhary, R.G.; Desimone, M.F.; Agrawal, A.; Shukla, S.K. Green synthesized nanomaterials for safe technology in sustainable agriculture. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2023, 24, 61–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Ghazy, N.A.; Abd El-Hafez, O.A.; El-Bakery, A.; El-Geddawy, D.I. Impact of silver nanoparticles and two biological treatments to control soft rot disease in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2021, 31, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Xu, L.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, D.-W. Bioinspired nanomodification strategies: Moving from chemical-Based agrosystems to sustainable agriculture. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 12655–12686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. El-Baky, N.A.; Amara, A.A.A.F. Recent approaches towards control of fungal diseases in plants: An updated review. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Alshameri, A.W.; Owais, M. Antibacterial and cytotoxic potency of the plant-mediated synthesis of metallic nanoparticles Ag NPs and ZnO NPs: A Review. OpenNano 2022, 8, 100077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mubeen, B.; Ansar, A.N.; Rasool, R.; Ullah, I.; Imam, S.S.; Alshehri, S.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Alzarea, S.I.; Nadeem, M.S.; Kazmi, I. Nanotechnology as a novel approach in combating microbes providing an alternative to antibiotics. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J. Bioactivity and biomodification of Ag, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles with relevance to plant performance in agriculture. Ind. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Rehman, F.u.; Paker, N.P.; Khan, M.; Naeem, M.; Munis, M.F.H.; Rehman, S.u.; Chaudhary, H.J. Bio-fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles from Picea smithiana and their potential antimicrobial activities against Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vesicatoria and Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial leaf spot and bacterial wilt in tomato. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chellappandian, M.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Karthi, S.; Kalaivani, K.; Hunter, W.B.; Ali, H.M.; Salem, M.Z.; Abdel-Megeed, A. Volatile toxin of Limonia acidissima (L.) produced larvicidal, developmental, repellent, and adulticidal toxicity effects on Aedes aegypti (L.). Toxin Rev. 2022, 41, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ramasamy, V.; Karthi, S.; Ganesan, R.; Prakash, P.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Umavathi, S.; Krutmuang, P.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P. Chemical characterization of billy goat weed extracts Ageratum conyzoides (Asteraceae) and their mosquitocidal activity against three blood-sucking pests and their non-toxicity against aquatic predators. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 28456–28469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mohamed, A.K.S.; Qayyum, M.F.; Abdel-Hadi, A.M.; Rehman, R.A.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M. Interactive effect of salinity and silver nanoparticles on photosynthetic and biochemical parameters of wheat. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 1736–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Danish, M.; Shahid, M.; Zeyad, M.T.; Bukhari, N.A.; Al-Khattaf, F.S.; Hatamleh, A.A.; Ali, S. Bacillus mojavensis, a metal-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacterium, improves growth, photosynthetic attributes, gas exchange parameters, and Alkalo-Polyphenol Contents in Silver Nanoparticle (Ag-NP)-Treated Withania somnifera L.(Ashwagandha). ACS Omega 2022, 7, 13878–13893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Zulfiqar, F.; Navarro, M.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, N.A.; Munné-Bosch, S. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: Advantages and limitations. Plant Sci. 2019, 289, 110270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hassanisaadi, M.; Barani, M.; Rahdar, A.; Heidary, M.; Thysiadou, A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Role of agrochemical-based nanomaterials in plants: Biotic and abiotic stress with germination improvement of seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 375–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Verma, K.K.; Song, X.-P.; Joshi, A.; Tian, D.-D.; Rajput, V.D.; Singh, M.; Arora, J.; Minkina, T.; Li, Y.-R. Recent trends in nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture under climate change for global food security. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Martineau, N.; Britt, D.W.; Haverkamp, R.; Anderson, A.J. Silver nanoparticles disrupt wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth in a sand matrix. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Lahuta, L.B.; Szablińska-Piernik, J.; Głowacka, K.; Stałanowska, K.; Railean-Plugaru, V.; Horbowicz, M.; Pomastowski, P.; Buszewski, B. The effect of bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles on germination, early seedling development, and metabolome of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Molecules 2022, 27, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Pudlarz, A.; Szemraj, J. Nanoparticles as carriers of proteins, peptides and other therapeutic molecules. Open Life Sci. 2018, 13, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Wolny-Koładka, K.A.; Malina, D.K. Silver nanoparticles toxicity against airborne strains of Staphylococcus spp. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2017, 52, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Pahal, V.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, V. Antibacterial activity and hormetic response of silver nanoparticles synthesized using leaflet extract of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rice (Oryza sativa) crop plants. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 154–167. [Google Scholar]
  179. Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Cui, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Su, C.-Y. Applications of metal–organic frameworks in heterogeneous supramolecular catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6011–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kumar, N.; Balamurugan, A. Purushothaman Balakrishnan, Kanchan Vishwakarma, and Kumaran Shanmugam. In Biogenic Nano-Particles and their Use in Agro-Ecosystems; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2020; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
  181. Han, X.; Yang, S.; Schröder, M. Metal–Organic Framework Materials for Production and Distribution of Ammonia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1998–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ying, S.; Guan, Z.; Ofoegbu, P.C.; Clubb, P.; Rico, C.; He, F.; Hong, J. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: Current developments and limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Alam, M.N.; Roy, N.; Mandal, D.; Begum, N.A. Green chemistry for nanochemistry: Exploring medicinal plants for the biogenic synthesis of metal NPs with fine-tuned properties. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11935–11956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Abd Elkodous, M.; El-Husseiny, H.M.; El-Sayyad, G.S.; Hashem, A.H.; Doghish, A.S.; Elfadil, D.; Radwan, Y.; El-Zeiny, H.M.; Bedair, H.; Ikhdair, O.A.; et al. Recent advances in waste-recycled nanomaterials for biomedical applications: Waste-to-wealth. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2021, 10, 1662–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wahab, A.; Munir, A.; Saleem, M.H.; AbdulRaheem, M.I.; Aziz, H.; Mfarrej, M.F.B.; Abdi, G. Interactions of Metal-Based Engineered Nanoparticles with Plants: An Overview of the State of Current Knowledge, Research Progress, and Prospects. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5396–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Salem, H.M.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; Babalghith, A.O.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Ibrahim, O.M.; Ebrahim, A.A.; El-Mageed, A.; et al. Role of nanoparticles in enhancing crop tolerance to abiotic stress: A comprehensive review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 946717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Hlapisi, N.; Motaung, T.E.; Linganiso, L.Z.; Oluwafemi, O.S.; Songca, S.P. Encapsulation of gold nanorods with porphyrins for the potential treatment of cancer and bacterial diseases: A critical review. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2019, 2019, 7147128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Boscaro, V.; Rivoira, M.; Sgorbini, B.; Bordano, V.; Dadone, F.; Gallicchio, M.; Pons, A.; Benetti, E.; Rosa, A.C. Evidence-based anti-diabetic properties of plant from the Occitan Valleys of the Piedmont Alps. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Khan, T.; Ullah, N.; Khan, M.A.; Nadhman, A. Plant-based gold nanoparticles; a comprehensive review of the decade-long research on synthesis, mechanistic aspects and diverse applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 272, 102017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Kah, M.; Tufenkji, N.; White, J.C. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Balasubramani, G.; Ramkumar, R.; Krishnaveni, N.; Pazhanimuthu, A.; Natarajan, T.; Sowmiya, R.; Perumal, P. Structural characterization, antioxidant and anticancer properties of gold nanoparticles synthesized from leaf extract (decoction) of Antigonon leptopus Hook. & Arn. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 30, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  192. Jafarzadeh, S.; Nafchi, A.M.; Salehabadi, A.; Oladzad-Abbasabadi, N.; Jafari, S.M. Application of bio-nanocomposite films and edible coatings for extending the shelf life of fresh fruits and vegetables. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 291, 102405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Milewska-Hendel, A.; Gawecki, R.; Zubko, M.; Stróż, D.; Kurczyńska, E. Diverse influence of nanoparticles on plant growth with a particular emphasis on crop plants. Acta Agrobot. 2016, 69, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Melinte, V.; Buruiana, T.; Rosca, I.; Chibac, A.L. TiO2-Based Photopolymerized Hybrid Catalysts with Visible Light Catalytic Activity Induced by In Situ Generated Ag/Au NPs. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 5138–5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Krishnan Sundarrajan, S.; Pottail, L. Green synthesis of bimetallic Ag@Au nanoparticles with aqueous fruit latex extract of Artocarpus heterophyllus and their synergistic medicinal efficacies. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Khan, S.A.; Shahid, S.; Lee, C.-S. Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Clerodendrum inerme; characterization, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Al-Radadi, N.S. Green biosynthesis of flaxseed gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) as potent anti-cancer agent against breast cancer cells. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2021, 25, 101243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Singh, G.; Singh, D.; Kumar, J.; Kumar, A. Use of Nano-Bio-Chemicals in Modern Agriculture to Accelerate Sustainable Growth. In Handbook of Research on Green Technologies for Sustainable Management of Agricultural Resources; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 26–49. [Google Scholar]
  199. Hyder, S.; Ul-Nisa, M.; Shahzadi; Shahid, H.; Gohar, F.; Gondal, A.S.; Riaz, N.; Younas, A.; Santos-Villalobos, S.d.L.; Montoya-Martínez, A.C.; et al. Recent Trends and Perspectives in the Application of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agriculture. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Salehi, H.; Abbas, S.; Saeed, F.; Poinern, G.E.; Siddique, K.H.; Varshney, R.K. Nano-enabled stress-smart agriculture: Can nanotechnology deliver drought and salinity-smart crops? J. Sustain. Agric. Environ. 2023, 2, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Maurice, N. Impact of Nanoparticles on Soil Microbes for Enhancing Soil Fertility and Productivity. In Nanotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture; Apple Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 75–127. [Google Scholar]
  202. García-Ovando, A.E.; Piña, J.E.R.; Naranjo, E.U.E.; Chávez, J.A.C.; Esquivel, K. Biosynthesized nanoparticles and implications by their use in crops: Effects over physiology, action mechanisms, plant stress responses and toxicity. Plant Stress 2022, 6, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Mandzhieva, S.S.; Rensing, C. Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Plants: An Evaluation of Cyto/Morpho-Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  204. Xu, S. Design and Fabrication of Antibacterial Nanocoatings on Cotton and Silk Fibers through Supramolecular Self-Assembly Technology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  205. Singh, A.; Singh, N.; Hussain, I.; Singh, H.; Singh, S. Plant-nanoparticle interaction: An approach to improve agricultural practices and plant productivity. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent 2015, 4, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  206. Liu, L.; Li, Y.; AL-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, E.; Alkhalifah, T.; Alturise, F.; Ali, H.E. Green synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using Alliaceae waste (Allium sativum) for a sustainable landscape enhancement using support vector regression. Chemosphere 2023, 334, 138638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Bakshi, M.; Kumar, A. Copper-based nanoparticles in the soil-plant environment: Assessing their applications, interactions, fate and toxicity. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Jiang, M.; Song, Y.; Kanwar, M.K.; Ahammed, G.J.; Shao, S.; Zhou, J. Phytonanotechnology applications in modern agriculture. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Kumari, A.; Harish; Singh, V.K.; Verma, K.K.; Mandzhieva, S.; Sushkova, S.; Srivastava, S.; Keswani, C. Coping with the challenges of abiotic stress in plants: New dimensions in the field application of nanoparticles. Plants 2021, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Sarraf, M.; Vishwakarma, K.; Kumar, V.; Arif, N.; Das, S.; Johnson, R.; Janeeshma, E.; Puthur, J.T.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Chauhan, D.K.; et al. Metal/metalloid-based nanomaterials for plant abiotic stress tolerance: An overview of the mechanisms. Plants 2022, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Etesami, H.; Fatemi, H.; Rizwan, M. Interactions of nanoparticles and salinity stress at physiological, biochemical and molecular levels in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Anayatullah, S.; Irfan, E.; Hussain, S.M.; Rizwan, M.; Sohail, M.I.; Jafir, M.; Ahmad, T.; Usman, M.; Alharby, H.F. Nanoparticles assisted regulation of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme system in plants under salt stress: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 314, 137649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Bhattacharjee, R.; Kumar, L.; Mukerjee, N.; Anand, U.; Dhasmana, A.; Preetam, S.; Bhaumik, S.; Sihi, S.; Pal, S.; Khare, T.; et al. The emergence of metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) as a phytomedicine: A two-facet role in plant growth, nano-toxicity and anti-phyto-microbial activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 155, 113658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Imtiaz, H.; Shiraz, M.; Mir, A.R.; Siddiqui, H.; Hayat, S. Nano-Priming Techniques for Plant Physio-Biochemistry and Stress Tolerance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Ahmad, Z.; Tahseen, S.; Wasi, A.; Ganie, I.B.; Shahzad, A.; Emamverdian, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Ding, Y. Nanotechnological interventions in agriculture. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Arora, S.; Murmu, G.; Mukherjee, K.; Saha, S.; Maity, D. A comprehensive overview of nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 355, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Zou, L.; Zhu, F.; Long, Z.-E.; Huang, Y. Bacterial extracellular electron transfer: A powerful route to the green biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials for multifunctional applications. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Joudeh, N.; Linke, D. Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: A comprehensive review for biologists. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Słoma, M. 3D printed electronics with nanomaterials. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 5623–5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Shabbir, M.K.; Syed, A.S.; Thebo, K.H.; Akhtar, J. Introduction to smart multifunctional metal nano-inks. In Smart Multifunctional Nano-Inks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  222. de Souza Terra, J.C. Core-Shell Silica Nanostructures for Greener Catalysis. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  223. Aboyewa, J.A.; Sibuyi, N.R.; Meyer, M.; Oguntibeju, O.O. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using some selected medicinal plants from southern africa and their biological applications. Plants 2021, 10, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Khan, M.; Khan, M.S.A.; Borah, K.K.; Goswami, Y.; Hakeem, K.R.; Chakrabartty, I. The potential exposure and hazards of metal-based nanoparticles on plants and environment, with special emphasis on ZnO NPs, TiO2 NPs, and AgNPs: A review. Environ. Adv. 2021, 6, 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Fagier, M.A. Plant-mediated biosynthesis and photocatalysis activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles: A prospect towards dyes mineralization. J. Nanotechnol. 2021, 2021, 6629180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Yadav, S.; Sawarni, N.; Dahiya, T.; Rana, J.; Sharma, M.; Batra, B. Nanoagriculture: Advantages and Drawbacks. In Agricultural and Environmental Nanotechnology: Novel Technologies and their Ecological Impact; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  227. Naqvi, S.A.R.; Sherazi, T.A.; Zahid, M.; Mansha, A.; El Zerey-Belaskri, A. Nanotechnology: A smart translation of ingredients in the agriculture industry. In Aquananotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 47–65. [Google Scholar]
  228. Kalpana, V.; Devi Rajeswari, V. A review on green synthesis, biomedical applications, and toxicity studies of ZnO NPs. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2018, 2018, 3569758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Islam, F.; Shohag, S.; Uddin, M.J.; Islam, M.R.; Nafady, M.H.; Akter, A.; Mitra, S.; Roy, A.; Emran, T.B.; Cavalu, S. Exploring the journey of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) toward biomedical applications. Materials 2022, 15, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Varun, S.; George, N.M.; Chandran, A.M.; Varghese, L.A.; Mural, P.K.S. Multifaceted PVDF nanofibers in energy, water and sensors: A contemporary review (2018 to 2022) and future perspective. J. Fluor. Chem. 2022, 265, 110064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Dehhaghi, M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; Panahi, H.K.S.; Nizami, A.-S. A state-of-the-art review on the application of nanomaterials for enhancing biogas production. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 251, 109597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Godoy-Gallardo, M.; Eckhard, U.; Delgado, L.M.; de Roo Puente, Y.J.; Hoyos-Nogués, M.; Gil, F.J.; Perez, R.A. Antibacterial approaches in tissue engineering using metal ions and nanoparticles: From mechanisms to applications. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 4470–4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Hayat, F.; Khanum, F.; Li, J.; Iqbal, S.; Khan, U.; Javed, H.U.; Razzaq, M.K.; Altaf, M.A.; Peng, Y.; Ma, X.; et al. Nanoparticles and their potential role in plant adaptation to abiotic stress in horticultural crops: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321, 112285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Shaghaleh, H.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Holford, P.; Shao, H.; Qi, W.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Wu, T. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: Potential effects on soil properties, crop production, food processing, and food quality. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 36942–36966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Mittal, D.; Kaur, G.; Singh, P.; Yadav, K.; Ali, S.A. Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: Recent advances and future outlook. Front. Nanotechnol. 2020, 2, 579954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Amritha, M.S.; Sridharan, K.; Puthur, J.T.; Dhankher, O.P. Priming with nanoscale materials for boosting abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 10017–10035. [Google Scholar]
  237. Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Zhang, P.; Ju, Q.; Xu, J. Physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses reveal zinc oxide nanoparticles modulate plant growth in tomato. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 3587–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sadati, S.Y.R.; Godehkahriz, S.J.; Ebadi, A.; Sedghi, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in wheat via physio-biochemical changes and stress genes expression. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, e3027. [Google Scholar]
  239. Thounaojam, T.C.; Thounaojam, T.M.; Upadhyaya, H. Role of zinc oxide nanoparticles in mediating abiotic stress responses in plant. In Zinc-Based Nanostructures for Environmental and Agricultural Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 323–337. [Google Scholar]
  240. Khanna, K.; Kohli, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Ohri, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, P. Arsenic as hazardous pollutant: Perspectives on engineering remediation tools. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 155870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, M.; Shakoor, N.; Adeel, M.; Zhou, P.; Guo, M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Lou, B.; et al. Application and mechanisms of metal-based nanoparticles in the control of bacterial and fungal crop diseases. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Dong, B.-R.; Jiang, R.; Chen, J.-F.; Xiao, Y.; Lv, Z.-Y.; Chen, W.-S. Strategic nanoparticle-mediated plant disease resistance. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2023, 43, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Mustafa, N.; Raja, N.I.; Ilyas, N.; Abasi, F.; Ahmad, M.S.; Ehsan, M.; Mehak, A.; Badshah, I.; Proćków, J. Exogenous Application of Green Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) to Improve the Germination, Physiochemical, and Yield Parameters of Wheat Plants under Salinity Stress. Molecules 2022, 27, 4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Gohari, G.; Mohammadi, A.; Akbari, A.; Panahirad, S.; Dadpour, M.R.; Fotopoulos, V.; Kimura, S. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) promote growth and ameliorate salinity stress effects on essential oil profile and biochemical attributes of Dracocephalum moldavica. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Shafiq, T.; Yasmin, H.; Shah, Z.A.; Nosheen, A.; Ahmad, P.; Kaushik, P.; Ahmad, A. Titanium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in combination with cadmium tolerant bacillus pumilus ameliorates the cadmium toxicity in maize. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Satti, S.H.; Raja, N.I.; Ikram, M.; Oraby, H.F.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R.; Mohamed, A.H.; Singh, A.; Omar, A.A. Plant-Based Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Trigger Biochemical and Proteome Modifications in Triticum aestivum L. under Biotic Stress of Puccinia striiformis. Molecules 2022, 27, 4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Mallick, S.; Nag, M.; Lahiri, D.; Pandit, S.; Sarkar, T.; Pati, S.; Nirmal, N.P.; Edinur, H.A.; Kari, Z.A.; Ahmad Mohd Zain, M.R.; et al. Engineered Nanotechnology: An Effective Therapeutic Platform for the Chronic Cutaneous Wound. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Salam, A.; Afridi, M.S.; Javed, M.A.; Saleem, A.; Hafeez, A.; Khan, A.R.; Zeeshan, M.; Ali, B.; Azhar, W.; Sumaira; et al. Nano-priming against abiotic stress: A way forward towards sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Abdalla, H.; Adarosy, M.H.; Hegazy, H.S.; Abdelhameed, R.E. Potential of green synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles for enhancing seedling emergence, vigor and tolerance indices and DPPH free radical scavenging in two varieties of soybean under salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Zare, A.S.; Ganjeali, A.; Kakhki, M.R.V.; Mashreghi, M.; Cheniany, M. Additive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizae and TiO2 nanoparticles on growth and essential oils enhancement of peppermint. Rhizosphere 2023, 25, 100659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Husen, A. Engineered Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agricultural Production, Soil Improvement and Stress Management; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  252. Panakkal, H.; Gupta, I.; Bhagat, R.; Ingle, A.P. Effects of different metal oxide nanoparticles on plant growth. In Nanotechnology in Plant Growth Promotion and Protection: Recent Advances and Impacts; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 259–282. [Google Scholar]
  253. Khalil, R.; ElSayed, N.; Hashem, H.A. Nanoparticles as a new promising tool to increase plant immunity against abiotic stress. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 53: Nanoparticles: A New Tool to Enhance Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 61–91. [Google Scholar]
  254. Cox, A.; Venkatachalam, P.; Sahi, S.; Sharma, N. Silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticle toxicity in plants: A review of current research. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Sarkar, R.D.; Kalita, M.C. Alleviation of salt stress complications in plants by nanoparticles and the associated mechanisms: An overview. Plant Stress 2023, 7, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Ayyaz, A.; Fang, R.; Ma, J.; Hannan, F.; Huang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Javed, M.; Ali, S.; Zhou, W.; Farooq, M.A. Calcium nanoparticles (Ca-NPs) improve drought stress tolerance in Brassica napus by modulating the photosystem II, nutrient acquisition and antioxidant performance. NanoImpact 2022, 28, 100423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Faizan, M.; Alam, P.; Rajput, V.D.; Faraz, A.; Afzal, S.; Ahmed, S.M.; Yu, F.-Y.; Minkina, T.; Hayat, S. Nanoparticle mediated plant tolerance to heavy metal stress: What we know? Sustainability 2023, 15, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Saeedeh, R.; Mehrnaz, H.; Mansour, G. Silicon-nanoparticle mediated changes in seed germination and vigor index of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) compared to silicate under PEG-induced drought stress. Gesunde Pflanz. 2021, 73, 575–589. [Google Scholar]
  259. Singh, N.; Bhuker, A.; Jeevanadam, J. Effects of metal nanoparticle-mediated treatment on seed quality parameters of different crops. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2021, 394, 1067–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Rahiman, N.; Mohammadi, M.; Alavizadeh, S.H.; Arabi, L.; Badiee, A.; Jaafari, M.R. Recent advancements in nanoparticle-mediated approaches for restoration of multiple sclerosis. J. Control. Release 2022, 343, 620–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Kalkan, B.; Orakdogen, N. Anionically modified N-(alkyl)acrylamide-based semi-IPN hybrid gels reinforced with SiO 2 for enhanced on–off switching and responsive properties. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 4582–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Barrett-Catton, E.; Ross, M.L.; Asuri, P. Multifunctional hydrogel nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Valle-García, J.D.; Ali, A.; Patra, J.K.; Kerry, R.G.; Das, G.; Fernández-Luqueño, F. Integration of Eco-Friendly Biological and Nanotechnological Strategies for Better Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach. In Agricultural and Environmental Nanotechnology: Novel Technologies and Their Ecological Impact; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 647–674. [Google Scholar]
  264. Boamah, P.O.; Onumah, J.; Aduguba, W.O.; Santo, K.G. Application of depolymerized chitosan in crop production: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 235, 123858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Zhao, L.; Bai, T.; Wei, H.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Keller, A.; White, J.C. Nanobiotechnology-based strategies for enhanced crop stress resilience. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Heikal, Y.M.; El-Esawi, M.A.; El-Ballat, E.M.; Abdel-Aziz, H.M. Applications of nanoparticles for mitigating salinity and drought stress in plants: An overview on the physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic aspects. New Zealand J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2022, 51, 297–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Arolu, F.; Chukwu, S.C.; Salisu, M.A.; Fagbohun, I.K.; Muftaudeen, T.K.; Swaray, S.; Haliru, B.S. Superabsorbent polymer hydrogels for sustainable agriculture: A review. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Kumar, S.; Nehra, M.; Dilbaghi, N.; Marrazza, G.; Hassan, A.A.; Kim, K.-H. Nano-based smart pesticide formulations: Emerging opportunities for agriculture. J. Control. Release 2019, 294, 131–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Li, C.; Yan, B. Opportunities and challenges of phyto-nanotechnology. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 2863–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Abbasi Khalaki, M.; Moameri, M.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; Astatkie, T. Influence of nano-priming on seed germination and plant growth of forage and medicinal plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 93, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Husen, A. Plants and Their Interaction to Environmental Pollution: Damage Detection, Adaptation, Tolerance, Physiological and Molecular Responses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  272. Bernhard, G.H.; Neale, R.E.; Barnes, P.W.; Neale, P.; Zepp, R.G.; Wilson, S.R.; Andrady, A.L.; Bais, A.F.; McKenzie, R.L.; Aucamp, P.J.; et al. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2020, 19, 542–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Sharma, P. Efficiency of bacteria and bacterial assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: An update. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 328, 124835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Mandal, S.; Pu, S.; Adhikari, S.; Ma, H.; Kim, D.-H.; Bai, Y.; Hou, D. Progress and future prospects in biochar composites: Application and reflection in the soil environment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 51, 219–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Xingzhu, D.; Qingrui, Z.; Keren, C.; Yuxi, L.; Yunpeng, H.; Shien, Z.; Xiangwei, F. Cryopreservation of porcine embryos: Recent updates and progress. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2021, 19, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Dhali, A.; Kolte, A.P.; Mishra, A.; Roy, S.C.; Bhatta, R. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos: Current status and opportunities. In Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Hormone Assays; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  277. Saxena, A.; Shukla, M.; Saxena, P. Synthetic seeds: Relevance to endangered germplasm conservation in vitro. In Synthetic Seeds: Germplasm Regeneration, Preservation and Prospects; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 21–60. [Google Scholar]
  278. Nhut, D.T. General information: Some aspects of plant tissue culture. In Plant Tissue Culture: New Techniques and Application in Horticultural Species of Tropical Region; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  279. Walker, L.P.; Buhler, D. Catalyzing Holistic Agriculture Innovation through Industrial Biotechnology. Ind. Biotechnol. 2020, 16, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Marin, F.; Eccel, E.; Castellani, C.; Gretter, A. Report 2015/2016: Agriculture, Food, Environment; Research and Innovation Centre Fondazione Edmund Mach: San Michele All’adige, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  281. Huy, N.; Hung, H.; Buckney, R.; De Filippis, L. Molecular biodiversity convergence with biogeography and ethnobotany of rare and endangered medicinal plants from northern Vietnam. In Plant and Human Health, Volume 1: Ethnobotany and Physiology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  282. Behboudi, F.; Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z.; Kassaee, M.Z.; Modares Sanavi, S.; Sorooshzadeh, A. Improving growth and yield of wheat under drought stress via application of SiO2 nanoparticles. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018, 20, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar]
  283. Adrees, M.; Khan, Z.S.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. Foliar spray of silicon nanoparticles improved the growth and minimized cadmium (Cd) in wheat under combined Cd and water-limited stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 77321–77332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Sharf-Eldin, A.A.; Alwutayd, K.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; Alharbi, B.M.; Eisa, M.A.; Alqurashi, M.; Sharaf, M.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; et al. Response of Maize Seedlings to Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) under Drought Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Herrero, M.P.; Johnson, R. Drought stress and its effects on maize reproductive systems. Crop Sci. 1981, 21, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Sionit, N.; Kramer, P.J. Effect of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agron. J. 1977, 69, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Poudel, S.; Vennam, R.R.; Shrestha, A.; Reddy, K.R.; Wijewardane, N.K.; Reddy, K.N.; Bheemanahalli, R. Resilience of soybean cultivars to drought stress during flowering and early-seed setting stages. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Barrett, D.M.; Beaulieu, J.C.; Shewfelt, R. Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: Desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Kader, A.A.; Yahia, E. Postharvest biology of tropical and subtropical fruits. In Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 79–111. [Google Scholar]
  290. Lin, D.; Zhao, Y. Innovations in the development and application of edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2007, 6, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Gao, Y.; de Bang, T.C.; Schjoerring, J.K. Cisgenic overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase improves nitrogen utilization efficiency in barley and prevents grain protein decline under elevated CO2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1209–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Goñi, O.; Łangowski, Ł.; Feeney, E.; Quille, P.; O’Connell, S. Reducing nitrogen input in barley crops while maintaining yields using an engineered biostimulant derived from Ascophyllum nodosum to enhance nitrogen use efficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 664682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Bogati, K.; Walczak, M. The impact of drought stress on soil microbial community, enzyme activities and plants. Agronomy 2022, 12, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Tseng, A.; Zhao, Y. Wine grape pomace as antioxidant dietary fibre for enhancing nutritional value and improving storability of yogurt and salad dressing. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Sandrou, D.; Arvanitoyannis, I. Low-fat/calorie foods: Current state and perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 40, 427–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Kader, A.A. Quality parameters of fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. In Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Science, Technology and Market; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  297. Ter Steeg, E.; Gildemacher, P. Chapter 8. Introducing improved vegetable varieties in a development context: Lessons for the introduction of hybrid true potato seed. In Impact of Hybrid Potato: The Future of Hybrid Potato from a Systems Perspective; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  298. Kumar, M.; Singh, P.; Nare, B.; Kumar, S. Precision Agriculture in Potato Production; New India Publishing Agency: New Delhi, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  299. Turamyenyirijuru, A. Effect of Timing and Methods of Mineral Fertilizer Application on Irish Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Performance in Musanze and Nyaruguru Districts, Rwanda; University of Nairobi: Nairobi, Kenya, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  300. Sezen, S.; Yazar, A.; Kapur, B.; Tekin, S. Comparison of drip and sprinkler irrigation strategies on sunflower seed and oil yield and quality under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Ali, A.; Ahmad, A.; Khaliq, T.; Ali, A.; Ahmad, M. Nitrogen nutrition and planting density effects on sunflower growth and yield: A review. Pak. J. Nutr. 2013, 12, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Wijewardana, C.; Reddy, K.R.; Bellaloui, N. Soybean seed physiology, quality, and chemical composition under soil moisture stress. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. El-Saidy, A.E.; Farouk, S.; Abd El-Ghany, H. Evaluation of different seed priming on seedling growth, yield and quality components in two sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars. Trends Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 6, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Khan, M.M.H.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ramlee, S.I.; Jusoh, M.; Al-Mamun, M. Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc): A crop for the new millennium, its genetic diversity, and improvements to mitigate future food and nutritional challenges. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Rai-Kalal, P.; Jajoo, A. Priming with zinc oxide nanoparticles improve germination and photosynthetic performance in wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 160, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Kadirimangalam, S.R.; Sawargaonkar, G.; Choudhari, P. Morphological and molecular insights of calcium in peanut pod development. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 9, 100320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Albahri, G.; Alyamani, A.A.; Badran, A.; Hijazi, A.; Nasser, M.; Maresca, M.; Baydoun, E. Enhancing Essential Grains Yield for Sustainable Food Security and Bio-Safe Agriculture through Latest Innovative Approaches. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Shah, K.K.; Modi, B.; Pandey, H.P.; Subedi, A.; Aryal, G.; Pandey, M.; Shrestha, J. Diversified crop rotation: An approach for sustainable agriculture production. Adv. Agric. 2021, 2021, 8924087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Vahdati, K.; Sarikhani, S.; Arab, M.M.; Leslie, C.A.; Dandekar, A.M.; Aletà, N.; Bielsa, B.; Gradziel, T.M.; Montesinos, Á.; Rubio-Cabetas, M.J.; et al. Advances in rootstock breeding of nut trees: Objectives and strategies. Plants 2021, 10, 2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Silvestri, C.; Bacchetta, L.; Bellincontro, A.; Cristofori, V. Advances in cultivar choice, hazelnut orchard management, and nut storage to enhance product quality and safety: An overview. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Ouzir, M.; Bernoussi, S.E.; Tabyaoui, M.; Taghzouti, K. Almond oil: A comprehensive review of chemical composition, extraction methods, preservation conditions, potential health benefits, and safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 3344–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Popescu, P.-A.; Palade, L.M.; Nicolae, I.-C.; Popa, E.E.; Miteluț, A.C.; Drăghici, M.C.; Matei, F.; Popa, M.E. Chitosan-Based Edible Coatings Containing Essential Oils to Preserve the Shelf Life and Postharvest Quality Parameters of Organic Strawberries and Apples during Cold Storage. Foods 2022, 11, 3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Dias, C.; Ribeiro, T.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Ferrante, A.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Pintado, M. Improving the ripening process after 1-MCP application: Implications and strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 113, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Ghosh, S.K.; Bera, T. Advances in Nano-Fertilizers and Nano-Pesticides in Agriculture; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; p. 415. [Google Scholar]
  315. Das, D.; Bisht, K.; Chauhan, A.; Gautam, S.; Jaiswal, J.P.; Salvi, P.; Lohani, P. Morpho-physiological and Biochemical responses in wheat foliar sprayed with zinc-chitosan-salicylic acid nanoparticles during drought stress. Plant Nano Biol. 2023, 4, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Samanta, S.; Roychoudhury, A. Recent trend in nanoparticle research in regulating arsenic bioaccumulation and mitigating arsenic toxicity in plant species. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 793–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Alkharabsheh, H.M.; Seleiman, M.F.; Hewedy, O.A.; Battaglia, M.L.; Jalal, R.S.; Alhammad, B.A.; Schillaci, C.; Ali, N.; Al-Doss, A. Field crop responses and management strategies to mitigate soil salinity in modern agriculture: A review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Li, Y.; Hu, J.; Qi, J.; Zhao, F.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, L.; Gu, J.; Wu, H.; Li, Z. Improvement of leaf K+ retention is a shared mechanism behind CeO2 and Mn3O4 nanoparticles improved rapeseed salt tolerance. Stress Biol. 2022, 2, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Bernela, M.; Seth, M.; Kaur, N.; Sharma, S.; Pati, P.K. Harnessing the potential of nanobiotechnology in medicinal plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 194, 116266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Ali, S.S.; Al-Tohamy, R.; Koutra, E.; Moawad, M.S.; Kornaros, M.; Mustafa, A.M.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; Badr, A.; Osman, M.E.; Elsamahy, T.; et al. Nanobiotechnological advancements in agriculture and food industry: Applications, nanotoxicity, and future perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Javanmardi, E.; Liu, S.; Xie, N. Exploring the Challenges to Sustainable Development from the Perspective of Grey Systems Theory. Systems 2023, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Hlongwane, M.M.; Mohammed, M.; Mokgalaka, N.S.; Dakora, F.D. The Potential of Rhizobacteria to Mitigate Abiotic Stress in Lessertia frutescens. Plants 2023, 12, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Deka, B.; Babu, A.; Baruah, C.; Barthakur, M. Nanopesticides: A systematic review of their prospects with special reference to tea pest management. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 686131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Zohra, T.; Khalil, A.T.; Saeed, F.; Latif, B.; Salman, M.; Ikram, A.; Ayaz, M.; Murthy, H. Green nano-biotechnology: A new sustainable paradigm to control dengue infection. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2022, 2022, 3994340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Priya, D.D.; Nandhakumar, M.; Shanavas, S.; Arasu, M.V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Madhumitha, G. Aerva lanata-mediated bio-treated production of copper oxide nanoparticles, optimization by BBD–RSM method and it behaviour against water related mosquito. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Sallam, A.R.; Mahdi, A.A.; Farroh, K.Y. Improving drought stress tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using magnetite and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2022, 23, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Kokina, I.; Plaksenkova, I.; Galek, R.; Jermaļonoka, M.; Kirilova, E.; Gerbreders, V.; Krasovska, M.; Sledevskis, E. Genotoxic evaluation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different three barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes to explore the stress-resistant molecules. Molecules 2021, 26, 6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Noman, M.; Ahmed, T.; Ijaz, U.; Hameed, A.; Shahid, M.; Azizullah; Li, D.; Song, F. Microbe-oriented nanoparticles as phytomedicines for plant health management: An emerging paradigm to achieve global food security. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 63, 7489–7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Tortella, G.; Pieretti, J.; Rubilar, O.; Fernández-Baldo, M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Diez, M.; Seabra, A. Silver, copper and copper oxide nanoparticles in the fight against human viruses: Progress and perspectives. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Qamer, S.; Romli, M.H.; Che-Hamzah, F.; Misni, N.; Joseph, N.M.; Al-Haj, N.A.; Amin-Nordin, S. Systematic review on biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and antibacterial activities: Application and theoretical perspectives. Molecules 2021, 26, 5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Ahmad, A.; Hashmi, S.S.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Influence of metallic, metallic oxide, and organic nanoparticles on plant physiology. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Younas, Z.; Naseer, S.; Kazmi, A.; Ali, A.; Wahab, A.; Sultana, T.; Shoukat, I.; Hameed, A.; Afzal, M.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R.; et al. Assessment of diversity among important Brinjal (Solanum melongena) cultivars using morphological markers. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 4255554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Qarni, A.; Muhammad, K.; Wahab, A.; Ali, A.; Khizar, C.; Ullah, I.; Kazmi, A.; Sultana, T.; Hameed, A.; Younas, M. Molecular Characterization of Wild and Cultivated Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) through DNA Barcode Markers. Genet. Res. 2022, 2022, 9249561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Ibrahim, M.; Akhtar, N.; Wahab, A.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Almutairi, M.H. Exploring Wild Edible Plants in Malakand, Pakistan: Ethnobotanical and Nutritional Insights. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Fouda, A.; Al-Otaibi, W.A.; Saber, T.; AlMotwaa, S.M.; Alshallash, K.S.; Elhady, M.; Badr, N.F.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A. Antimicrobial, antiviral, and in-vitro cytotoxicity and mosquitocidal activities of Portulaca oleracea-based green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Xiong, T.; Zhang, S.; Kang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Li, S. Dose-dependent physiological and transcriptomic responses of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to copper oxide nanoparticles—Insights into the phytotoxicity mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Hasan, M.M.; Alharbi, B.M.; Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; Abdulmajeed, A.M.; Alghanem, S.M.; Al-Mushhin, A.A.; Jahan, M.S.; Corpas, F.J.; Fang, X.-W.; Soliman, M.H. Spermine-mediated tolerance to selenium toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) depends on endogenous nitric oxide synthesis. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Mardi, A.; Mohajjel Shoja, H.; Mohajel Kazemi, E. Comparative study of growth responses, photosynthetic pigment content, and gene expression pattern in tobacco plants treated with ZnO nano and ZnO bulk particles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2022, 24, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Yasmin, H.; Mazher, J.; Azmat, A.; Nosheen, A.; Naz, R.; Hassan, M.N.; Noureldeen, A.; Ahmad, P. Combined application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biofertilizer to induce salt resistance in safflower by regulating ion homeostasis and antioxidant defence responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 218, 112262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Roy, D.; Adhikari, S.; Adhikari, A.; Ghosh, S.; Azahar, I.; Basuli, D.; Hossain, Z. Impact of CuO nanoparticles on maize: Comparison with CuO bulk particles with special reference to oxidative stress damages and antioxidant defense status. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Ulhassan, Z.; Bhat, J.A.; Zhou, W.; Senan, A.M.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, P. Attenuation mechanisms of arsenic induced toxicity and its accumulation in plants by engineered nanoparticles: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 302, 119038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Mirmoeini, T.; Pishkar, L.; Kahrizi, D.; Barzin, G.; Karimi, N. Phytotoxicity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles on Camelina sativa L. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Faizan, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Hessini, K.; Yu, F.; Ahmad, P. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviates the adverse effects of cadmium stress on Oryza sativa via modulation of the photosynthesis and antioxidant defense system. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 220, 112401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Metryka, O.; Wasilkowski, D.; Mrozik, A. Insight into the antibacterial activity of selected metal nanoparticles and alterations within the antioxidant defence system in Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Sutulienė, R.; Brazaitytė, A.; Małek, S.; Jasik, M.; Samuolienė, G. Response of oxidative stress and antioxidant system in pea plants exposed to drought and boron nanoparticles. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Castroverde, C.D.M.; Dina, D. Temperature regulation of plant hormone signaling during stress and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 7436–7458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Li, S.; Zheng, H.; Lin, L.; Wang, F.; Sui, N. Roles of brassinosteroids in plant growth and abiotic stress response. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 93, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Santhosh, P.B.; Genova, J.; Chamati, H. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles: An eco-friendly approach. Chemistry 2022, 4, 345–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Pandey, S.; Chakraborty, D. Salicylic acid increases tolerance of Vigna mungo cv. T9 to short-term drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Ikram, M.; Javed, B.; Hassan, S.W.U.; Satti, S.H.; Sarwer, A.; Raja, N.I.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R. Therapeutic potential of biogenic titanium dioxide nanoparticles: A review on mechanistic approaches. Nanomedicine 2021, 16, 1429–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Aslam, A.A.; Aslam, M.S.; Aslam, A.A. An Overview on Green synthesis of Nanoparticles and their Advanced Applications in Sustainable Agriculture. Int. J. Appl. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2022, 3, 70–99. [Google Scholar]
  353. Haider, A.; Ijaz, M.; Ali, S.; Haider, J.; Imran, M.; Majeed, H.; Shahzadi, I.; Ali, M.M.; Khan, J.A.; Ikram, M. Green synthesized phytochemically (Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum) reduced nickel oxide nanoparticles confirmed bactericidal and catalytic potential. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Kumar, S.; Paliya, B.S.; Singh, B.N. Superior inhibition of virulence and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 by phyto-synthesized silver nanoparticles through anti-quorum sensing activity. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 170, 105678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Theis, S.; Lefore, N.; Meinzen-Dick, R.; Bryan, E. What happens after technology adoption? Gendered aspects of small-scale irrigation technologies in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania. Agric. Hum. Values 2018, 35, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Woodhill, J.; Hasnain, S.; Griffith, A. What Future for Small-Scale Agriculture? Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  357. Vogel, C.; Mathé, S.; Geitzenauer, M.; Ndah, H.T.; Sieber, S.; Bonatti, M.; Lana, M. Stakeholders’ perceptions on sustainability transition pathways of the cocoa value chain towards improved livelihood of small-scale farming households in Cameroon. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2020, 18, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Rajput, V.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Behal, A.; Maksimov, A.; Blicharska, E.; Ghazaryan, K.; Movsesyan, H.; Barsova, N. ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: A threat to soil organisms, plants, and human health. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  359. Ranjan, A.; Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Bauer, T.; Chauhan, A.; Jindal, T. Nanoparticles induced stress and toxicity in plants. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 15, 100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Coman, V.; Oprea, I.; Leopold, L.F.; Vodnar, D.C.; Coman, C. Soybean interaction with engineered nanomaterials: A literature review of recent data. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Elbehiry, F.; Elbasiouny, H.; El-Ramady, H. Bioaccumulation and biotransformation of metal-based nanoparticles in plants. In Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 299–315. [Google Scholar]
  362. Marcińczyk, M.; Oleszczuk, P. Biochar and engineered biochar as slow-and controlled-release fertilizers. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 339, 130685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Ashitha, A.; Mathew, J. Characteristics and types of slow/controlled release of pesticides. In Controlled Release of Pesticides for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 141–153. [Google Scholar]
  364. Messina, C.D.; Cooper, M.; Hammer, G.L.; Berning, D.; Ciampitti, I.; Clark, R.; Diepenbrock, C.; Gho, C.; Jines, M.; Lee, T. Two decades of creating drought tolerant maize and underpinning prediction technologies in the US corn-belt: Review and perspectives on the future of crop design. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Mega, R.; Abe, F.; Kim, J.-S.; Tsuboi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Sakata, Y.; Hanada, K.; Tsujimoto, H.; Kikuchi, J.; et al. Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Kundel, D.; Bodenhausen, N.; Jørgensen, H.B.; Truu, J.; Birkhofer, K.; Hedlund, K.; Mäder, P.; Fliessbach, A. Effects of simulated drought on biological soil quality, microbial diversity and yields under long-term conventional and organic agriculture. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Keesstra, S.; Nunes, J.; Novara, A.; Finger, D.; Avelar, D.; Kalantari, Z.; Cerdà, A. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Oyebola, O.O.; Olatunde, O.M. Climate change adaptation through aquaculture: Ecological considerations and regulatory requirements for tropical Africa. In Agriculture and Ecosystem Resilience in Sub Saharan Africa: Livelihood Pathways Under Changing Climate; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 435–472. [Google Scholar]
  369. Musah-Surugu, J.I.; Owusu, K.; Yankson, P.W.K.; Ayisi, E.K. Mainstreaming climate change into local governance: Financing and budgetary compliance in selected local governments in Ghana. Dev. Pract. 2018, 28, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Verma, V.; Al-Dossari, M.; Singh, J.; Rawat, M.; Kordy, M.; Shaban, M. A Review on Green Synthesis of TiO2 NPs: Synthesis and Applications in Photocatalysis and Antimicrobial. Polymers 2022, 14, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  371. Ali, S.; Sulaiman, S.; Khan, A.; Khan, M.R.; Khan, R. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) from Parrotiopsis jacquemontiana (Decne) Rehder leaf extract and its biological activities. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  372. Kapoor, D.; Singh, M.P. Nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. In Plant Responses to Nanomaterials: Recent Interventions, and Physiological and Biochemical Responses; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  373. Hofmann, T.; Lowry, G.V.; Ghoshal, S.; Tufenkji, N.; Brambilla, D.; Dutcher, J.R.; Gilbertson, L.M.; Giraldo, J.P.; Kinsella, J.M.; Landry, M.P.; et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Jangjou, A.; Zareshahrabadi, Z.; Abbasi, M.; Talaiekhozani, A.; Kamyab, H.; Chelliapan, S.; Vaez, A.; Golchin, A.; Tayebi, L.; Vafa, E.; et al. Time to conquer fungal infectious diseases: Employing nanoparticles as powerful and versatile antifungal nanosystems against a wide variety of fungal species. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Elemike, E.E.; Uzoh, I.M.; Onwudiwe, D.C.; Babalola, O.O. The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Kausar, A.; Hussain, S.; Javed, T.; Zafar, S.; Anwar, S.; Hussain, S.; Zahra, N.; Saqib, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles as potential hallmarks for enhancing drought stress tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 195, 341–350. [Google Scholar]
  377. Gogala, N. Regulation of mycorrhizal infection by hormonal factors produced by hosts and fungi. Experientia 1991, 47, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Agrawal, S.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, S.; Shahi, S.K. Plant development and crop protection using phytonanotechnology: A new window for sustainable agriculture. Chemosphere 2022, 299, 134465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Brewer, A.; Dror, I.; Berkowitz, B. The mobility of plastic nanoparticles in aqueous and soil environments: A critical review. ACS EST Water 2020, 1, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Shah, M.P.; Rodriguez-Couto, S. Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes: Microbial Degradation of Xenobiotics Through Bacterial and Fungal Approach; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  381. Singh, Y.R.; Selvam, A.; Lokhande, P.; Chakrabarti, S. Sustainability: An Emerging Design Criterion in Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications. In Bioinspired and Green Synthesis of Nanostructures: A Sustainable Approach; Scrivener Publishing LLC: Beverly, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 65–113. [Google Scholar]
  382. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Using Graywater and Stormwater to Enhance Local Water Supplies: An Assessment of Risks, Costs, and Benefits; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  383. Ehsan, M.; Waheed, A.; Ullah, A.; Kazmi, A.; Ali, A.; Raja, N.I.; Mashwani, Z.-U.-R.; Sultana, T.; Mustafa, N.; Ikram, M. Plant-Based Bimetallic Silver-Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Perspective of Synthesis, Biomedical Applications, and Future Trends. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 1215183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  384. Omran, B.A.; Whitehead, K.A.; Baek, K.-H. One-pot bioinspired synthesis of fluorescent metal chalcogenide and carbon quantum dots: Applications and potential biotoxicity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 200, 111578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  385. Das, P.; Ghosh, S.; Nayak, B. Phyto-fabricated nanoparticles and their anti-biofilm activity: Progress and current status. Front. Nanotechnol. 2021, 3, 739286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Rai, M.; Shende, S.S.; Paralikar, P. In Vivo Antifungal Efficacy of Copper and Sulfur Nanoparticles on Soft Rot of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). BioNanoScience 2023, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Ashraf, H.; Anjum, T.; Riaz, S.; Naseem, S. Microwave-assisted green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Melia azedarach for the management of Fusarium wilt in tomato. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  388. Rai, P.K. Novel adsorbents in remediation of hazardous environmental pollutants: Progress, selectivity, and sustainability prospects. Clean. Mater. 2022, 3, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Kailasam, S.; Sundaramanickam, A.; Tamilvanan, R.; Kanth, S.V. Macrophytic waste optimization by synthesis of silver nanoparticles and exploring their agro-fungicidal activity. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2023, 53, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Dappula, S.S.; Kandrakonda, Y.R.; Shaik, J.B.; Mothukuru, S.L.; Lebaka, V.R.; Mannarapu, M.; Amooru, G.D. Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Andrographis alata: Characterization, optimization and assessment of their antibacterial, antioxidant, antidiabetic and anti-Alzheimer’s properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1273, 134264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Javed, B.; Nadhman, A. Optimization, characterization and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles against plant bacterial pathogens phyto-synthesized by Mentha longifolia. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 085406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  392. Petrova, A.; Plaksenkova, I.; Kokina, I.; Jermaļonoka, M. Effect of Fe3O4 and CuO Nanoparticles on morphology, genotoxicity, and miRNA expression on different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 6644689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Prasad, A.R.; Williams, L.; Garvasis, J.; Shamsheera, K.; Basheer, S.M.; Kuruvilla, M.; Joseph, A. Applications of phytogenic ZnO nanoparticles: A review on recent advancements. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 331, 115805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  394. Naiel, B.; Fawzy, M.; Halmy, M.W.A.; Mahmoud, A.E.D. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Sea Lavender (Limonium pruinosum L. Chaz.) extract: Characterization, evaluation of anti-skin cancer, antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Deguine, J.-P.; Aubertot, J.-N.; Flor, R.J.; Lescourret, F.; Wyckhuys, K.A.; Ratnadass, A. Integrated pest management: Good intentions, hard realities. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Ahmadalipour, A.; Moradkhani, H.; Castelletti, A.; Magliocca, N. Future drought risk in Africa: Integrating vulnerability, climate change, and population growth. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 672–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Sahana, V.; Mondal, A.; Sreekumar, P. Drought vulnerability and risk assessment in India: Sensitivity analysis and comparison of aggregation techniques. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Nanoparticles improved stress tolerance in plants and developed different modes of penetration.
Figure 1. Nanoparticles improved stress tolerance in plants and developed different modes of penetration.
Sustainability 15 14792 g001
Figure 2. Nanoparticles improved stress tolerance in wheat crops from germination to the harvesting stage.
Figure 2. Nanoparticles improved stress tolerance in wheat crops from germination to the harvesting stage.
Sustainability 15 14792 g002
Figure 3. Drought-tolerant Tomato crops can be made via nanoparticle-mediated mechanisms and plant hormonal regulations.
Figure 3. Drought-tolerant Tomato crops can be made via nanoparticle-mediated mechanisms and plant hormonal regulations.
Sustainability 15 14792 g003
Table 1. Comparative Analysis of the Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Methodological Approaches and Implications for Sustainability and Practical Applications.
Table 1. Comparative Analysis of the Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Methodological Approaches and Implications for Sustainability and Practical Applications.
CategoryDescriptionReferences
MethodologyUtilization of biological entities such as plants or plant extracts in the formation of nanoparticles [56,57,58]
Environmental ImpactLower toxic byproduct generation, environmentally friendly process [52,59]
Cost-EffectivenessCost-effective compared to chemical synthesis [53,54]
Application AreasUsed in medicine, electronics, catalysis, environmental remediation [55,60]
ScalabilityAdaptable to various applications [26]
Time EfficiencyGenerally, a faster process [61]
Safety ConsiderationsSafer synthesis process, minimizing risks [62]
Table 2. Advantages of phyto-synthesized NPs over other methods.
Table 2. Advantages of phyto-synthesized NPs over other methods.
AdvantagePhyto-SynthesisOther MethodsReference
Environmental FriendlinessLow toxic byproduct generation Hazardous waste [76]
CostCost-effective Expensive reagents [77]
Energy EfficiencyLess energy consumption More energy consumption [70]
Scalability and VersatilityAdaptable Limited scalability [79]
Use of Renewable ResourcesRenewable plant materials Non-renewable materials [80]
Time EfficiencyFaster process Time-consuming [81]
Safety ConsiderationsSafer due to non-toxic materials Safety risks [82]
Quality ControlFine control Quality variations [83]
Table 3. Overview of the Influence of a Multitude of Nanoparticles on Enhancing Drought Tolerance in Plants.
Table 3. Overview of the Influence of a Multitude of Nanoparticles on Enhancing Drought Tolerance in Plants.
Plant SpeciesNanoparticleObserved EffectReferences
WheatIron-NPsEnhanced photosynthesis and reduced oxidative stress[91,92,93]
WheatSilica-NPsEnhanced plant growth and development[94]
RapeseedMaghemite-NPsIncreased growth and reduced water stress[95,96]
WheatSelenium-NPsImproved plant growth and development[84,94,97]
WheatIron-NPsIncreased plant growth and reduced oxidative stress[97,98]
CornTiO2-NPsIncreased water use efficiency[99]
SunflowerSilver and TiO2-NPsImproved root and shoot length[100,101,102]
SoybeanCopper oxide-NPsMitigated drought effects via increased antioxidant activity[103,104,105]
RiceAlumina-NPsPromoted nutrient uptake and improved drought resilience[106,107]
CottonChitosan-NPsEnhanced leaf water content and reduced transpiration rate[108,109]
BarleyZirconia-NPsIncreased root length and biomass[110,111]
TomatoCerium oxide-NPsImproved stomatal conductance and water use efficiency[112,113]
MaizeGold-NPsEnhanced photosynthetic efficiency and reduced oxidative stress[114,115]
ChickpeaSilica-NPsAugmented nutrient uptake and drought tolerance[116,117]
Table 4. Types of Nanoparticles and Their Mechanisms of Action for Mitigating Drought Stress in Specific Food Crops.
Table 4. Types of Nanoparticles and Their Mechanisms of Action for Mitigating Drought Stress in Specific Food Crops.
NanoparticleMechanism of ActionApplications in Drought Stress MitigationSpecific Food Crops TestedReferences
Silver NanoparticlesEnhance water uptake, modulate stress-responsive genesImproved drought tolerance, water use efficiencyOryza sativa L.[129,130]
Gold NanoparticlesImprove root architecture, influence osmotic adjustmentEnhanced root growth under drought conditionsTriticum aestivum L.[131,132]
Zinc Oxide NanoparticlesIncrease antioxidant enzymes, regulate stress-related hormonesProtection against oxidative damage under drought stressZea mays L.[133,134]
Iron Oxide NanoparticlesImprove water utilization efficiency, enhance chlorophyll contentEnhanced growth and yield under water-limited conditionsGlycine max L. Merr.[135,136]
Copper Oxide NanoparticlesRegulate stomatal conductance, improve nutrient uptakeIncreased resistance to water stress, improved nutrient efficiencySorghum bicolor L. Moench[136,137]
Titanium Dioxide NanoparticlesIncrease water retention, enhance photosynthetic efficiencyImproved growth and reduced water loss under drought conditionsHordeum vulgare L.[99,138,139]
Silica NanoparticlesEnhance cell wall rigidity, increase water holding capacityReduced evapotranspiration, improved drought toleranceSolanum lycopersicum L.[33,140]
Cerium Oxide NanoparticlesAct as antioxidants, regulate water and nutrient transportEnhance drought resistance by reducing oxidative stressCucumis sativus L.[103,141,142]
Magnesium Oxide NanoparticlesImprove nutrient absorption, enhance water use efficiencyIncreased drought tolerance, improved nutrient availabilityLactuca sativa L.[143,144]
Calcium Oxide NanoparticlesRegulate cell membrane stability, increase root water uptakeEnhanced root development, improved water retentionSpinacia oleracea L.[145,146]
Aluminum Oxide NanoparticlesModulate stress-responsive enzymes, increase water retentionImproved growth and stress tolerance under drought conditionsHelianthus annuus L.[147,148,149,150]
Selenium NanoparticlesAct as antioxidants, enhance stress tolerance mechanismsImproved growth, yield, and water use efficiency under drought conditionsBrassica napus L.[151,152]
Table 5. Multifaceted Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Induced Drought Resilience in Agriculture”.
Table 5. Multifaceted Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Induced Drought Resilience in Agriculture”.
MechanismDescriptionExample NanoparticlesPotential ApplicationsReferences
Water RetentionNanoparticles can enhance soil’s water-holding capacity, thus reducing water loss during periods of drought.Hydrogel, ClayCrop growth and development [261,262]
Nutrient DeliveryNanoparticles can encapsulate and deliver essential nutrients to plants, ensuring optimal growth even in water-scarce conditions.Chitosan, SilicaCrop Growth, Soil Health[263,264]
Stress Signal ModulationNanoparticles can be engineered to interact with plant signaling pathways, helping plants manage drought stress better.Gold, SilverPlant Stress Management[265,266]
Controlled IrrigationNanoparticles can be used in innovative irrigation systems to respond to soil moisture levels and provide controlled and efficient water delivery.Polymer-basedPrecision Agriculture, Water Saving[267,268]
Enhanced Root GrowthSpecific nanoparticles can promote root growth, allowing plants to access deeper water sources and better withstand drought conditions.Carbon NanotubesAgriculture, Reforestation[266,269,270]
PhotoprotectionNanoparticles can shield plants from excessive sunlight, which often accompanies drought conditions, thereby reducing stress and damage to the plant.Titanium DioxideSun Protection for Plants[271,272]
Stimulating MicroorganismsNanoparticles can foster the growth of beneficial soil microorganisms, enhancing soil structure and increasing water retention capacity.Zinc OxideSoil Health, Microbial Enhancement[273,274]
Table 6. Effect of Nanoparticle-Mediated Drought Stress Alleviation in Food Crops and Economic Impact.
Table 6. Effect of Nanoparticle-Mediated Drought Stress Alleviation in Food Crops and Economic Impact.
Food CropDrought Stress Effect without-NPsDrought Stress Effect with Phyto-Synthesized-NPsPhysiological ImpactEconomic ImpactReferences
Triticum aestivumYield decrease (altered metabolismEnhanced growth improved metabolismImproved root development, leaf structureIncreased market value, reduced losses[106,282]
Oryza sativaGrain size reduction (nutrient deficiencyIncreased grain size improved nutrient contentImproved nutrient uptake, enhanced growthCost-effective production, higher profits[103,283]
Zea maysStunted growth yield reductionEnhanced growth rate increased yield Increased photosynthetic efficiencyEnhanced export potential[284,285]
Glycine maxDelayed flowering reduced protein content Timely flowering, improved protein contentImproved seed quality, faster maturationImproved price competitiveness[286,287]
Solanum lycopersicumReduced fruit size, loss of flavorImproved fruit size enhanced flavorEnhanced taste, nutritional valueReduced spoilage, better market reception[288,289,290]
Hordeum vulgareYield reduction (20%), decreased enzyme activityYield increase (30%), normalized enzyme activityIncreased disease resistanceBetter yield, economic efficiency[291,292,293]
Lactuca sativaSlow growth reduced vitamin contentAccelerated growth enhanced vitamin contentImproved texture, tasteIncreased consumer acceptance[294,295,296]
Solanum tuberosumReduced tuber size delayed harvest timeIncreased tuber size on-time harvestEnhanced tuber quality, uniformityHigher market value, reduced wastage[297,298,299]
Helianthus annuusReduced seed yield decreased oil contentIncreased seed yield enhanced oil contentThe improved oil quality, seed vigorImproved production economics[300,301,302,303]
Arachis hypogaeaReduced pod size, lower protein concentrationImproved pod size increased protein concentrationImproved seed germination, growthEnhanced processing efficiency[302,304,305,306]
Avena sativaReduced grain yield decreased nutritional valueIncreased grain yield enhanced nutritional valueEnhanced resistance to drought, pestReduced production costs, increased demand[307,308]
Prunus dulcisReduced nut size, lower oil qualityImproved nut size increased oil qualityImproved tree health, nut qualityImproved export potential, price stability[309,310,311]
Malus domesticaReduced fruit quality delayed ripeningImproved fruit quality on-time ripeningEnhanced taste, appearanceIncreased market acceptance, demand[312,313]
Table 7. Risks, Challenges, and Mitigation Strategies of Using Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles in Agriculture.
Table 7. Risks, Challenges, and Mitigation Strategies of Using Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles in Agriculture.
AspectRisks and ChallengesMitigation StrategiesReferences
Food Crops1. Toxicity: Possible toxicity to plants and soil organisms.Monitoring nanoparticle concentration.[358,359]
2. Bioaccumulation: Risk of nanoparticles accumulating in edible parts of plants.Researching appropriate materials and sizes.[360,361]
3. Environmental Impact: Uncontrolled dispersion in the environment.Implementing controlled release mechanisms.[362,363]
Drought Management1. Efficiency: Uncertain efficiency in drought resistance.They are conducting thorough field tests.[364,365]
2. Long-term Effects: Unknown long-term impacts on soil health.Continuous monitoring and adapting practices.[366,367]
3. Regulatory Compliance: Legal and regulatory considerations.They are ensuring compliance with local regulations.[368,369]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wahab, A.; Batool, F.; Muhammad, M.; Zaman, W.; Mikhlef, R.M.; Naeem, M. Current Knowledge, Research Progress, and Future Prospects of Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles Interactions with Food Crops under Induced Drought Stress. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792

AMA Style

Wahab A, Batool F, Muhammad M, Zaman W, Mikhlef RM, Naeem M. Current Knowledge, Research Progress, and Future Prospects of Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles Interactions with Food Crops under Induced Drought Stress. Sustainability. 2023; 15(20):14792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wahab, Abdul, Farwa Batool, Murad Muhammad, Wajid Zaman, Rafid Magid Mikhlef, and Muhammad Naeem. 2023. "Current Knowledge, Research Progress, and Future Prospects of Phyto-Synthesized Nanoparticles Interactions with Food Crops under Induced Drought Stress" Sustainability 15, no. 20: 14792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop