Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence, Transport and the Smart City: Definitions and Dimensions of a New Mobility Era
Next Article in Special Issue
LCA and Exergo-Environmental Evaluation of a Combined Heat and Power Double-Flash Geothermal Power Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Facilitating Collaborative Partnerships in Education Policy Research: A Case of Multi-Stakeholder, Co-Investigation for Monitoring and Evaluation of Education for Sustainable Development
Article

Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems

1
RES Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
2
Center for Colloid and Surface Science, 50019 Firenze, Italy
3
Enel Green Power, 56122 Pisa, Italy
4
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2786; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072786
Received: 25 February 2020 / Revised: 27 March 2020 / Accepted: 30 March 2020 / Published: 1 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Geothermal Energy Conversion—Life Cycle Analysis)
A life cycle analysis was performed for the assessment of the environmental performances of three existing Italian power plants of comparable nominal power operating with different sources of renewable energy: Geothermal, solar, and wind. Primary data were used for building the life cycle inventories. The results are characterized by employing a wide portfolio of environmental indicators employing the ReCiPe 2016 and the ILCD 2011 Midpoint+ methods; normalization and weighting are also applied using the ReCiPe 2016 method at the endpoint level. The midpoint results demonstrate a good eco-profile of the geothermal power plant compared to other renewable energy systems and a definite step forward over the performance of the national energy mix. The Eco-Point single score calculation showed that wind energy is the best technology with a value of 0.0012 Eco-points/kWh, a result in line with previously documented life cycle analysis studies. Nevertheless, the geothermal power plant achieved a value of 0.0177 Eco-points/kWh which is close to that calculated for the photovoltaic plant (0.0087 Eco-points/kWh) and much lower than the national energy mix one (0.1240 Eco-points/kWh). Also, a scenario analysis allowed for a critical discussion about potential improvements to the environmental performance of the geothermal power plant. View Full-Text
Keywords: geothermal energy; life cycle analysis; solar energy; photovoltaics; renewable energy power plant; wind energy geothermal energy; life cycle analysis; solar energy; photovoltaics; renewable energy power plant; wind energy
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Basosi, R.; Bonciani, R.; Frosali, D.; Manfrida, G.; Parisi, M.L.; Sansone, F. Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072786

AMA Style

Basosi R, Bonciani R, Frosali D, Manfrida G, Parisi ML, Sansone F. Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basosi, Riccardo, Roberto Bonciani, Dario Frosali, Giampaolo Manfrida, Maria L. Parisi, and Franco Sansone. 2020. "Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072786

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop