Next Article in Journal
Forecasting Clean Energy Consumption in China by 2025: Using Improved Grey Model GM (1, N)
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation into Creep Characteristics and Model of Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste Used in Embankment Filler
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial Concrete as a Sustainable Building Material?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evolution of the Individual Attitude in the Risk Decision of Waste Incinerator Construction: Cellular Automaton Model
Open AccessArticle

Uncover Cost-Benefit Disparity of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration in Chinese Provinces

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020697
Received: 13 December 2019 / Revised: 11 January 2020 / Accepted: 12 January 2020 / Published: 18 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Trends in Municipal Solid Waste Management)
Incineration has been regarded as a promising method to respond to municipal solid waste (MSW) challenges. However, its high cost and health impacts are the main barriers to the development of incineration. This study aims to investigate the cost-benefit of MSW incineration in 31 Chinese provinces to identify the regional disparity of incineration policy in China. Life cycle environmental impacts and costs were analyzed using the life cycle assessment software Gabi 8.0 and method CML-2001. Results show that MSW disposal costs, Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Eutrophication Potential (EP) will decline significantly with the increase in incineration rate for all Chinese provinces, while the environmental impacts of Human Toxicity Potential (HTP), Ozone Layer Depletion Potential (OLDP) and Terrestric Ecotoxicity Potential (TETP) increase the trend. Economically developed and populated provinces such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shandong have both a higher incineration volume and incineration potential. As for the cost-benefit analysis, developed provinces such as Guangdong, Chongqing, Shanghai and Tianjin exhibit the highest cost-benefit in toxic impacts of HTP, TETP and ODP. Northern provinces such as Jilin, Xinjiang, Heilongjiang and Hebei have the lowest cost-benefit in toxic impacts but have the highest cost-benefit in GWP and EP. Finally, policy remarks on incineration cost, priority provinces, integration of sorting and incineration are also discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; Chinese provinces; municipal solid waste incineration; environmental benefit life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; Chinese provinces; municipal solid waste incineration; environmental benefit
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, S.; Dong, H. Uncover Cost-Benefit Disparity of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration in Chinese Provinces. Sustainability 2020, 12, 697.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop