Next Article in Journal
Physical Properties of Straw Bales as a Construction Material: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Frequency of Visits and Time Spent in Urban Green Space on Subjective Well-Being
Previous Article in Journal
Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Orange Peel Waste: Effect of Activated Carbon Addition and Alkaline Pretreatment on the Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Benefit–Cost Analysis of Green Roof Initiative Projects: The Case of Jung-gu, Seoul
Article

Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis

by 1,2,* and 1
1
School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
2
Society for Urban Ecology, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(12), 3387; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123387
Received: 29 March 2019 / Revised: 6 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 June 2019 / Published: 19 June 2019
Green spaces in cities are under pressure from increasing population, urbanization, and development, making governance of these common pool resources a complex and multi-dimensional process. Governance of urban green spaces can be improved by participatory approaches. However, many developing countries do not have the institutional structures and policies that promote the participation of a range of non-state actors, and green spaces are often removed from public access by regulatory slippage or elite capture for parks and gardens. This paper uses discourse analysis to explore the perspectives of the key stakeholders for public participation in the planning and management of green spaces in Lahore. The study employs Q-methodology to reveal four discourses: ‘Efficient Management’, ‘Anti/Pro-Administrative’, ‘Leadership and Capacity building’, and ‘Decentralization or Elite capture’. The most significant and dominant discourse of ‘Efficient Management’ shows stakeholders’ preferences towards developing new institutional arrangements at the local level through engaging citizens. The two discourses ‘Leadership and Capacity building’ and ‘decentralization or elite capture’ are also in favor of changing the power dynamics in the system at certain levels by using different strategies. However, the status quo-oriented administrative discourse serves as a barrier, resisting change at any level. The results of this study suggest a need for policy reforms to develop a conducive environment in which all the stakeholders can be engaged through different collaborative and co-management schemes, in order to achieve economically efficient, ecologically sustainable and socially equitable, urban green spaces in Lahore. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban green spaces; public participation; governance; institutional design; discourse analysis; Q-methodology urban green spaces; public participation; governance; institutional design; discourse analysis; Q-methodology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alam, R.; Lovett, J.C. Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123387

AMA Style

Alam R, Lovett JC. Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis. Sustainability. 2019; 11(12):3387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alam, Rizwana, and Jon C. Lovett. 2019. "Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis" Sustainability 11, no. 12: 3387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123387

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop