Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Growth and Token Economy Design: The Case of Steemit
Next Article in Special Issue
Land-Use/Land-Cover Change from Socio-Economic Drivers and Their Impact on Biodiversity in Nan Province, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Pursuing Sustainability for Healthcare through Digital Platforms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid Increase and Long-Term Slow Decrease in Soil C stock Due to Agricultural Development in Hokkaido Tokachi District
Open AccessArticle

Changing Agro-Pastoral Livelihoods under Collective and Private Land Use in Xinjiang, China

1
College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2
Environmental Science, Policy, & Management Department, UC Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(1), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010166
Received: 15 October 2018 / Revised: 19 December 2018 / Accepted: 21 December 2018 / Published: 30 December 2018
After the founding of P. R. China, land use in rural China was organized under two successive paradigms: state-directed collectivization from 1958–1984 (the Collective Era), and privatization after 1984 (the Household Land Contract Period, HLCP). Taking Nileke County of Xinjiang as a case study, this research analyzed the livelihood changes of agro-pastoralists over the two periods using quantitative household livelihood assets—financial, physical, natural, human, and social capital—as indicators. Using annual series data of the five livelihood capitals, a comprehensive livelihood assets index (CLAI) was calculated by two-stage factor analysis. Higher CLAI scores meant better living and reduced poverty for agro-pastoralists. Quantitative results were validated and detailed with semi-structured household interviews. The results showed that CLAI slightly increased during the HLCP in comparison to the Collective Era, mainly due to increases in financial and physical capital. In contrast, natural and social capital showed downward trends, indicating that alleviation of poverty came at the cost of natural resources and social justice. Natural capital was the main contributor to agro-pastoralist livelihoods during the Collective Era, but diminished and was replaced by financial capital during the HLCP. Based on the findings, we put forward policy suggestions to improve community land management and sustainable livelihoods as part of future poverty alleviation efforts. View Full-Text
Keywords: agro-pastoralist; privatization; sustainable livelihoods framework; china; rural development agro-pastoralist; privatization; sustainable livelihoods framework; china; rural development
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Hruska, T.; Talinbayi, S.; Li, W. Changing Agro-Pastoral Livelihoods under Collective and Private Land Use in Xinjiang, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 166.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop