Next Article in Journal
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Sustainable Supply Chain Financing Decision Based on Triple Bottom Line Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Crop Loss in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Criteria Analysis of Pollution Caused by Auto Traffic in a Geographical Area Limited to Applicability for an Eco-Economy Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Risk Indicators of Building Damage Due to Typhoons: Focusing on Cases of South Korea
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4241;

A Comparative Analysis of Coordination, Participation, and Training in Post-Disaster Shelter Projects

School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Department of Communication, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 October 2018 / Revised: 13 November 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 16 November 2018
PDF [2643 KB, uploaded 17 November 2018]


The delivery of post-disaster shelter assistance continues to be fraught with challenges derived from the coordination of resources, involvement of project stakeholders, and training of households and builders. There is a need to better understand what project elements in the delivery of post-disaster shelter projects most influence resilience and sustainability. To address this need, we examined nineteen post-disaster shelter projects in the Philippines following Typhoon Haiyan. We first characterized coordination, participation, and training employed across the planning, design, and construction phases of shelter projects and then used fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to assess the influence of these elements, alone and in combination, on building resilient and sustainable community infrastructure systems. Findings show that early involvement of households in planning efforts, combined with subsequent training, was important in evolving recovery outcomes. Our results point to the importance of: (1) supporting household sheltering processes over delivering hard products; (2) strategically linking project processes across phases; and (3) aligning humanitarian actions with long-term development. Conclusions from this study contribute to theory of sheltering in developing communities and more broadly to theory of recovery processes that link to community resilience and sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: resilience; sustainability; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; housing resilience; sustainability; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; housing

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Opdyke, A.; Javernick-Will, A.; Koschmann, M. A Comparative Analysis of Coordination, Participation, and Training in Post-Disaster Shelter Projects. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4241.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top