Knowledge about Fertility in Croatia, Measured with the Croatian Version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-Hr), in Relation to Attitudes toward Having a Child and Associated Factors in a Cross-Sectional Survey
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Participants and Materials
2.3. Sample Size
2.4. Questionnaire
2.5. Sociodemographic Data
2.6. Childbirth Data
2.7. Data on Fertility Education
2.8. Data Analysis
2.9. Ethical Principles
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Data
3.2. Source of Knowledge on Fertility
3.3. Knowledge of Fertility and Related Factors
4. Discussion
4.1. Knowledge of Fertility
4.2. Decision on Childbirth
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Public Involvement Statement
Guidelines and Standards Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Fertility Data; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/family-planning-0 (accessed on 28 October 2023).
- United Nations. World Fertility Report; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/data/world-fertility-data (accessed on 28 October 2023).
- United Nations. World Population Prospects; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Available online: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Fertility/ (accessed on 28 October 2023).
- George, K.; Kamath, M.S. Fertility and age. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 3, 121. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/jhrs/fulltext/2010/03030/Fertility_and_age.3.aspx (accessed on 25 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). “Fertility Rates”; OECD Family Database: Paris, France, 2021; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm (accessed on 29 October 2023).
- Schmidt, L.; Sobotka, T.; Bentzen, J.G.; Nyboe, A.A. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum. Reprod. Update 2012, 18, 29–43. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/18/1/29/854296 (accessed on 25 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Bunting, L.; Boivin, J. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility status awareness tool: FertiSTAT. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 25, 1722–1733. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/25/7/1722/631258 (accessed on 23 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Williamson, L.E.; Lawson, K.L.; Downe, P.J.; Pierson, R.A. Informed reproductive decision-making: The impact of providing fertility information on fertility knowledge and intentions to delay childbearing. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2014, 36, 400–405. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1701216315305855 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Wojcieszek, A.M.; Thompson, R. Conceiving of change: A brief intervention increases young adults’ knowledge of fertility and the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 523–529. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028213004998 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statista. Hamburg: Croatia Fertility Rate 1950–2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/348296/fertility-rate-in-croatia/ (accessed on 22 October 2023).
- Nejašmić, I.; Toskić, A. Starenje Stanovništva u Hrvatskoj–Sadašnje Stanje i Perspektive. Hrvat. Geogr. Glas. 2013, 75, 89–110. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/155905 (accessed on 20 October 2023). (In Croatian). [CrossRef]
- Eurostat. Luxembourg: Fertility Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Fertility_statistics (accessed on 29 October 2023).
- United Nations. New York: Statistical Database. Available online: https://w3.unece.org/PXWeb/en/Table?IndicatorCode=34 (accessed on 29 October 2023).
- Daniluk, J.C.; Koert, E.; Cheung, A. Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: Identifying the gaps. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 97, 420–426. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211028226 (accessed on 20 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Daniluk, J.C.; Koert, E. The other side of the fertility coin: A comparison of childless men’s and women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 839–846. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001502821202345X (accessed on 21 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Hammarberg, K.; Setter, T.; Norman, R.J.; Holden, C.A.; Michelmore, J.; Johnson, L. Knowledge about factors that influence fertility among Australians of reproductive age: A population-based survey. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 502–507. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0015028212023436 (accessed on 21 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Lampic, C.; Svanberg, A.S.; Karlström, P.; Tydén, T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 558–564. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/21/2/558/614195 (accessed on 21 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Daniluk, J.C.; Koerrt, E. Fertility awareness online: The efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 353–363. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/30/2/353/728578 (accessed on 21 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vidranski, V.; Radman, A.; Kajić, K.; Bronić, A. Knowledge and awareness of iodine intake-survey among Croatian women of reproductive age. Biochem. Med. 2020, 30, 104–109. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/340445 (accessed on 21 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia, D.; Brazal, S.; Rodriguez, A.; Prat, A.; Vassena, R. Knowledge of age-related fertility decline in women: A systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 230, 109–118. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301211518309965 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hart, R.J. Physiological aspects of female fertility: Role of the environment, modern lifestyle, and genetics. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 873–909. Available online: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physrev.00023.2015 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bunting, L.; Tsibulsky, I.; Boivin, J. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: Findings from the international fertility decision-making study. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 385–397. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/28/2/385/597899 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammarberg, K.; Collins, V.; Holden, C.; Young, K.; McLachlan, R. Men’s knowledge, attitudes and behaviors relating to fertility. Hum. Reprod. Update 2017, 23, 458–480. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/23/4/458/3065332 (accessed on 22 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Hammarberg, K.; Zosel, R.; Comoy, C.; Robertson, S.; Holden, C.; Deeks, M.; Johnson, L. Fertility-related knowledge and information-seeking behavior among people of reproductive age: A qualitative study. Hum. Fertil. 2017, 20, 88–95. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14647273.2016.1245447 (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Meissner, C.; Schippert, C.; von Versen-Hoynck, F. Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016, 33, 719–729. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10815-016-0717-1 (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Sorensen, N.O.; Marcussen, S.; Backhausen, M.G.; Juhl, M.; Schmidt, L.; Tyden, T.; Hegaard, H.K. Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students. Reprod. Health 2016, 13, 146. Available online: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-016-0258-1 (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Maeda, E.; Sugimori, H.; Nakamura, F.; Kobayashi, Y.; Green, J.; Suka, M.; Okamoto, M.; Boivin, J.; Saito, H. A cross-sectional study on fertility knowledge in Japan, measured with the Japanese version of Cardiff fertility knowledge scale (CFKS-J). Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 10. Available online: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-12-10?report=reader (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Revelli, A.; Razzano, A.; Delle, P.L.; Casano, S.; Benedetto, C. Awareness of the effects of postponing motherhood among hospital gynecologists: Is their knowledge sufficient to offer appropriate help to patients? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016, 33, 215–220. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10815-015-0640-x (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, L.; Peterson, B.; Inhorn, M.C.; Boehm, J.K.; Patrizio, P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 403–411. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/2/403/2380094 (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammarberg, K. Knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to fertility among nurses working in primary health. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs. 2016, 34, 6–13. Available online: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.576782069523178 (accessed on 23 October 2023).
- Rovei, V.; Gennarelli, G.; Lantieri, T.; Casano, S.; Revelli, A.; Massobrio, M. Family planning, fertility awareness and knowledge about Italian legislation on assisted reproduction among Italian academic students. Reprod. BioMed Online 2010, 20, 873–879. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1472648310001756 (accessed on 23 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peterson, B.D.; Pirritano, M.; Tucker, L.; Lampic, C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 1375–1382. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/27/5/1375/694164 (accessed on 25 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Lucas, N.; Rosario, R.; Shelling, A. New Zealand University students’ knowledge of fertility decline in women via natural pregnancy and assis sted reproductive technologies. Hum. Fertil. 2015, 18, 208–214. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/14647273.2015.1006694 (accessed on 25 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maeda, E.; Nakamura, F.; Boivin, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Sugimori, H.; Saito, H. Fertility knowledge and the timing of first childbearing: A cross-sectional study in Japan. Hum. Fertil. 2016, 19, 275–281. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14647273.2016.1239033 (accessed on 25 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tisaj Pigac, S. Utjecaj Formalnog Obrazovanja na Fertilitet Žena: Presječno Istraživanje [Diplomski rad]. [Croatian]. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Fakultet Zdravstvenih studija u Rijeci. 2022. Available online: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:559931 (accessed on 26 October 2023).
- Surveysistem.org. San Rafael. Sample Size. Available online: https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Reynolds, R.; Smoller, S.; Allen, A.; Nicholas, P.K. Health literacy and health outcomes in persons living with HIV disease: A systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2019, 23, 3024–3043. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-019-02432-9 (accessed on 26 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, S.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, C.; Wang, Y.; Du, X.; Xie, R. Health literacy and health outcomes in hypertension: An integrative review. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2018, 5, 301–309. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013217302971 (accessed on 27 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Berkman, N.D.; Sheridan, S.L.; Donahue, K.E.; Halpern, D.J.; Crotty, K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 155, 97–107. Available online: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/abs/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 (accessed on 27 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Al, S.F.; Majumdar, S.R.; Williams, B.; Robertson, S.; Johnson, J.A. Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: A systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2013, 28, 444–452. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z (accessed on 27 October 2023).
- Freilich, K.; Holton, S.; Rowe, H.; Kirkman, M.; Jordan, L.; McNamee, K.; Bayly, C.; McBain, J.; Sinnott, V.; Fisher, J. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of effective and less effective contraceptive methods: Findings from the understanding fertility Management in Contemporary Australia survey. Eur. J. Contracept Reprod. Health Care 2017, 22, 212–221. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625187.2017.1304534 (accessed on 28 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yanhui, Z.; Yang, L.; Ting, W.; Yanhui, C.; Mingzhu, C.; Jingxia, F. College students responding to the Chinese version of Cardiff fertility knowledge scale show deficiencies in their awareness: A cross-sectional survey in Hunan, China. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 810. Available online: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-08937-6 (accessed on 28 October 2023).
- Our World in Data. Wales. Population Momentum: If the Number of Children Per Woman is Falling, Why Is the Population Still Increasing? Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/population-momentum (accessed on 11 March 2024).
- Hrvatski Zavod za Javno Zdravstvo Porodi u Zdravstvenim Ustanovama u Hrvatskoj u 2021. Godini. [Croatian]. Available online: https://www.hzjz.hr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Porodi_2021.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2023).
- O’Brien, Y.; Wingfield, M.B. Reproductive ageing-turning back the clock? Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 188, 161–167. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11845-018-1769-2 (accessed on 29 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Van der Heijde, C.M.; Collard, P.R.; Vonk, P.; Meijman, F.J. Better informed is better decided: Addressing the risks of delaying childbearing for female higher educational students. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2018, 32, 20170175. Available online: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0175/html (accessed on 29 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MacIvor, T.L. The politics of female pain: Women’s citizenship, twilight sleep and the early birth control movement. Med. Humanit. 2019, 45, 67–74. Available online: https://mh.bmj.com/content/45/1/67 (accessed on 29 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Levin, S. Sexual and reproductive health without freedom?: The conflict over abortion in Argentina. Salud. Colect. 2018, 14, 377–389. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=hr&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=52.%09Levin+S.+Sexual+and+reproductive+health+without+freedom&btnG= (accessed on 29 October 2023). [PubMed]
- World Health Organization & UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Sexual Health and Its Linkages to Reproductive Health: An Operational Approach; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/258738 (accessed on 29 October 2023).
- Hammarberg, K.; Norman, R.J.; Robertson, S.; McLachlan, R.; Michelmore, J.; Johnson, L. Development of a health promotion programme to improve awareness of factors that affect fertility, and evaluation of its reach in the first 5 years. Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online 2017, 4, 33–40. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661817300163 (accessed on 29 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lucke, J. Better sex education for Young people is a public health solution to the problem of advanced maternal age. Am. J. Bioeth. 2015, 15, 58–60. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2015.1088989 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Mazza, D.; Cannold, L.; Nagle, C.; McKay, F.; Brijnath, B. Making decisions about fertility—Three facts GPs need to communicate to women. Aust. Fam. Physician 2012, 41, 343–346. Available online: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.265323119950520 (accessed on 30 October 2023).
- Heywood, W.; Pitts, M.K.; Patrick, K.; Mitchell, A. Fertility knowledge and intentions to have children in a national study of Australian secondary school students. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2016, 40, 462–467. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023011500 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fehring, R.J.; Schneider, M.; Raviele, K.; Rodriguez, D.; Pruszynski, J. Randomized comparison of two internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Contracept 2013, 88, 24–30. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010782412008992 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conceição, C.; Pedro, J.; Martins, M.V. Effectiveness of a video intervention on fertility knowledge among university students: A randomised pre-test/posttest study. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2017, 22, 107–111. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625187.2017.1288903 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boivin, J.; Koert, E.; Harris, T.; O’Shea, L.; Perryman, A.; Parker, K.; Harrison, C. An experimental evaluation of the benefits and costs of providing fertility information to adolescents and emerging adults. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1247–1253. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/33/7/1247/4996985 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Maeda, E.; Nakamura, F.; Kobayashi, Y.; Boivin, J.; Sugimori, H.; Murata, K.; Saito, H. Effects of fertility education on knowledge, desires and anxiety among the reproductive-aged population: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2051–2060. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/9/2051/2913883 (accessed on 30 October 2023). [CrossRef]
Age in Years | N (%) | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | 30.8 (5.2) | ||
Range (categories) | 18–24 | 177 (11) | 0.356 |
25–29 | 423 (28) | ||
30–34 | 531 (34) | ||
35< | 410 (27) | ||
Range (total) | 18–41 | ||
Marriage status | |||
Married | 1418 (92) | 0.462 | |
Single parent | 123 (8) | ||
Education status | |||
Elementary school or less | 260 (17) | 0.364 | |
High school | 865 (56) | ||
College/university | 416 (27) | ||
Place of living | |||
Urban | 1278 (83) | 0.034 | |
Rural | 263 (17) | ||
Economic status | |||
551–1000 € | 255 (17) | 0.125 | |
1001–1500 € | 938 (60) | ||
1501–2000 € | 229 (15) | ||
>2001 € | 119 (8) |
Categories | N (%) | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Age at the birth of the first child | |||
Years | 18–24 | 215 (14) | 0.032 |
25–29 | 596 (39) | ||
30–34 | 513 (33) | ||
35< | 217 (14) | ||
Number of children born | |||
First childbirth | 796 (52) | 0.214 | |
Second childbirth | 493 (32) | ||
Third childbirth or more | 252 (16) | ||
Do you want to have more children in the future? | |||
First childbirth | |||
Yes | 661 (83) | 0.021 | |
No | 135 (17) | ||
Second childbirth | |||
Yes | 207 (42) | ||
No | 286 (58) | ||
Third childbirth or more | |||
Yes | 28 (11) | ||
No | 224 (89) |
Source of Knowledge | Categories | N, % | p |
---|---|---|---|
Education system | Total | 123 (8) | |
18–24 | 11 (9) | 0.453 | |
25–29 | 21 (17) | ||
30–34 | 32 (26) | ||
35< | 59 (48) | ||
Family, friends | Total | 345 (22) | |
18–24 | 73 (22) | 0.287 | |
25–29 | 62 (18) | ||
30–34 | 91 (26) | ||
35< | 119 (34) | ||
Television, newspapers | Total | 46 (3) | |
18–24 | 2 (5) | 0.614 | |
25–29 | 12 (26) | ||
30–34 | 19 (41) | ||
35< | 13 (28) | ||
Healthcare system | Total | 521 (33) | |
18–24 | 26 (6) | 0.032 | |
25–29 | 85 (16) | ||
30–34 | 168 (32) | ||
35< | 242 (46) | ||
Internet | Total | 491 (31) | |
18–24 | 107 (21) | 0.562 | |
25–29 | 175 (36) | ||
30–34 | 122 (25) | ||
35< | 87 (18) | ||
Not sure | Total | 46 (3) | |
18–24 | 18 (39) | 0.425 | |
25–29 | 13 (28) | ||
30–34 | 11 (24) | ||
35< | 4 (9) |
Statements (T—True; F—False) | Total Correct Answer (%) | Categories | Correct Answer (%) |
---|---|---|---|
A woman is less fertile after the age of 36 years. (T) | 63 | 18–24 | (7) |
25–29 | (41) | ||
30–34 | (30) | ||
35< | (22) | ||
A couple would be classified as infertile if they did not achieve a pregnancy after 1 year of regular sexual intercourse (without using contraception). (T) | 41 | 18–24 | (22) |
25–29 | (28) | ||
30–34 | (36) | ||
35< | (14) | ||
Smoking decreases female fertility. (T) | 62 | 18–24 | (7) |
25–29 | (18) | ||
30–34 | (33) | ||
35< | (42) | ||
Smoking decreases male fertility. (T) | 61 | 18–24 | (2) |
25–29 | (23) | ||
30–34 | (29) | ||
35< | (46) | ||
About 1 in 10 couples are infertile. (T) | 41 | 18–24 | (24) |
25–29 | (21) | ||
30–34 | (34) | ||
35< | (21) | ||
If a man produces sperm, he is fertile. (F) | 62 | 18–24 | (32) |
25–29 | (31) | ||
30–34 | (23) | ||
35< | (14) | ||
These days, a woman in her 40s has a similar chance of getting pregnant as a woman in her 30s. (F) | 71 | 18–24 | (18) |
25–29 | (12) | ||
30–34 | (34) | ||
35< | (36) | ||
Having a healthy lifestyle makes you fertile. (F) | 26 | 18–24 | (9) |
25–29 | (18) | ||
30–34 | (32) | ||
35< | (41) | ||
If a man has had mumps after puberty, he is more likely to later have a fertility problem. (T) | 67 | 18–24 | (3) |
25–29 | (17) | ||
30–34 | (34) | ||
35< | (46) | ||
A woman who never menstruates is still fertile. (F) | 32 | 18–24 | (17) |
25–29 | (23) | ||
30–34 | (37) | ||
35< | (23) | ||
If a woman is overweight by more than 13 kg, then she may not be able to get pregnant. (T) | 51 | 18–24 | (21) |
25–29 | (18) | ||
30–34 | (29) | ||
35< | (32) | ||
If a man can achieve an erection, it is an indication that he is fertile. (F) | 61 | 18–24 | (26) |
25–29 | (21) | ||
30–34 | (32) | ||
35< | (21) | ||
People who have had a sexually transmitted disease are likely to have reduced fertility. (T) | 35 | 18–24 | (36) |
25–29 | (28) | ||
30–34 | (20) | ||
35< | (16) |
* CFKS Mean (SD) | T/F Value | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | |||
18–24 | 51.4 (21.3) | −1.42 | 0.17 |
25–29 | 53.2 (20.5) | ||
30–34 | 52.3 (23.1) | ||
35< | 55.6 (24.7) | ||
Marriage status | |||
Married | 56.5 (18.6) | 3.22 | 0.01 |
Single parent | 52.9 (22.5) | ||
Education status | |||
Elementary school or less | 53.4 (19.7) | 4.23 | 0.01 |
High school | 56.8 (17.6) | ||
College/university | 59.3 (24.7) | ||
Economic status | |||
551–1000 EUR | 50.7 (21.3) | −1.34 | 0.35 |
1001–1500 EUR | 53.4 (22.6) | ||
1501–2000 EUR | 52.4 (19.7) | ||
>2001 EUR | 52.8 (21.9) | ||
Place of living | |||
Urban | 57.8 (15.8) | −1.29 | 0.26 |
Rural | 51.6 (19.7) | ||
Age at the birth of the first child | |||
18–24 | 49.8 (24.6) | −1.25 | 0.23 |
25–29 | 52.3 (23.1) | ||
30–34 | 55.4 (18.6) | ||
35< | 51.4 (22.4) | ||
Do you want to have more children in the future? | |||
One child | 52.6 (22.4) | −1.32 | 0.12 |
Two children | 54.1 (18.6) | ||
Three children | 56.5 (18.2) | ||
Four children | 53.3 (23.4) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Buljubašić, A.; Švaljug, D.; Mudnić Pulje, M.; Gusar, I.; Jerković, J.; Jerončić Tomić, I. Knowledge about Fertility in Croatia, Measured with the Croatian Version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-Hr), in Relation to Attitudes toward Having a Child and Associated Factors in a Cross-Sectional Survey. Nurs. Rep. 2024, 14, 816-828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020063
Buljubašić A, Švaljug D, Mudnić Pulje M, Gusar I, Jerković J, Jerončić Tomić I. Knowledge about Fertility in Croatia, Measured with the Croatian Version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-Hr), in Relation to Attitudes toward Having a Child and Associated Factors in a Cross-Sectional Survey. Nursing Reports. 2024; 14(2):816-828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020063
Chicago/Turabian StyleBuljubašić, Ante, Deana Švaljug, Martina Mudnić Pulje, Ivana Gusar, Jelena Jerković, and Iris Jerončić Tomić. 2024. "Knowledge about Fertility in Croatia, Measured with the Croatian Version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-Hr), in Relation to Attitudes toward Having a Child and Associated Factors in a Cross-Sectional Survey" Nursing Reports 14, no. 2: 816-828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020063
APA StyleBuljubašić, A., Švaljug, D., Mudnić Pulje, M., Gusar, I., Jerković, J., & Jerončić Tomić, I. (2024). Knowledge about Fertility in Croatia, Measured with the Croatian Version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-Hr), in Relation to Attitudes toward Having a Child and Associated Factors in a Cross-Sectional Survey. Nursing Reports, 14(2), 816-828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020063