Next Article in Journal
Nanogel: A Versatile Nano-Delivery System for Biomedical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Co-crystals, Salts or Mixtures of Both? The Case of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarates
Previous Article in Journal
Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Delivery of Chemotherapeutics: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Polymorphism of Drugs: New Approaches to the Synthesis of Nanostructured Polymorphs
Open AccessArticle

Mechanochemical Formation of Racemic Praziquantel Hemihydrate with Improved Biopharmaceutical Properties

Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, P.le Europa 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 1 Pasteura Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, CB2-1EW Cambridge, UK
Department of Chemistry and NIS Centre, University of Torino, V. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel; Switzerland
Universität Basel, Petersplatz 1, P.O. Box, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current Affiliation: Programme of Pharmacy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil.
Pharmaceutics 2020, 12(3), 289;
Received: 4 March 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 20 March 2020 / Published: 23 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Polymorphism and Dosage Form Design)


Praziquantel (PZQ) is the first-line drug used against schistosomiasis, one of the most common parasitic diseases in the world. A series of crystalline structures including two new polymorphs of the pure drug and a series of cocrystals of PZQ have been discovered and deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). This work adds to the list of multicomponent forms of PZQ a relevant example of a racemic hemihydrate (PZQ-HH), obtainable from commercial PZQ (polymorphic Form A) through mechanochemistry. Noteworthy, the formation of the new hemihydrate strongly depends on the initial polymorphic form of PZQ and on the experimental conditions used. The new PZQ-HH has been fully characterized by means of HPLC, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Hot-Stage Microscopy (SEM), Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), FT-IR, polarimetry, solid-state NMR (SS-NMR), solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR), and in vitro tests on Schistosoma mansoni adults. The crystal structure was solved from the powder X-ray diffraction pattern and validated by periodic-DFT calculations. The new bioactive hemihydrate was physically stable for three months and showed peculiar biopharmaceutical features including enhanced solubility and a double intrinsic dissolution rate in water in comparison to the commercially available PZQ Form A.
Keywords: praziquantel; hemihydrate; mechanochemistry; neat grinding; liquid-assisted grinding; racemic compound; polymorphism; crystal structure solution praziquantel; hemihydrate; mechanochemistry; neat grinding; liquid-assisted grinding; racemic compound; polymorphism; crystal structure solution

1. Introduction

In the last few years, significant attention has been dedicated to the improvement of therapies for neglected tropical diseases, including schistosomiasis. Indeed, around 240 million people are currently affected by schistosomiasis, as reported by the World Health Organization [1], and it has been placed third (after malaria and intestinal helminthiases) in the rank of the main tropical diseases [2]. Schistosomiasis is caused by the infection by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma and, depending on the species, chronic worsening can lead to bladder cancer, kidney failure, liver fibrosis, intestinal and urinary diseases, etc. [3]. Currently, praziquantel (PZQ) represents the drug of choice against all species of Schistosoma, with a therapeutic regimen of 20 mg/kg three times a day at intervals of 4 to 6 h or as a single dose of 40 mg/kg (depending on the parasite and whether used for individual patient management or mass drug administration) [3,4]. Such a high dosage is mainly due to the poor water solubility and bioavailability and extensive first-pass metabolism [5]. Very minor and transient side effects [6] and low toxicity in animals [7] are reported for PZQ. The low toxicity together with the possibility of administration in pregnant women and children under 24 months [8] and the lack of alternative treatment options are some of the main reasons why PZQ is the main choice for the treatment of schistosomiasis.
PZQ (Figure 1) is currently used in the racemic form, even though the pharmacological activity is mainly driven by the (R)-enantiomer [9,10,11,12], which also has a much higher bioavailability [13]. Moreover, (S)-PZQ (the inactive enantiomer) has been recognized as being responsible for the bitter taste [14] and worsened side effects [15,16].
The commercial form of PZQ is a racemic anhydrate structure, indexed as TELCEU [17] in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) [18]. The crystal structures of the pure enantiomers are also available in CSD as hemihydrates (CSD codes SIGBUG, SIGBUG01) [14,15]. In the context of improving the biopharmaceutical properties of commercial PZQ, recently, two additional anhydrate polymorphic forms (Form B and Form C) were reported by our group produced through neat grinding of commercial PZQ (Form A) for about 4 h in a vibrational mill. The two new polymorphs are also available in CSD (indexed as TELCEU01 and GOYZOM, respectively). Both PZQ Form B and Form C preserve the activity against Schistosoma and have an improved water solubility [19,20]. Very recently, other authors have proposed a further solid form, not indexed in the CSD, reported as a pink powder; however, the performed characterizations neither allowed to solve the structure nor to validate it [21]. Moreover, our group has also reported the possibility of obtaining PZQ in a highly amorphous state, physically stable for several months, by a mechanochemical treatment in the presence of different polymeric excipients [22]. Such solid dispersions, however, presented a diminished drug recovery, which was found to be dependent on the polymer used [23,24]. Conversely, when PZQ is processed alone by neat grinding maintains a conspicuous residual crystallinity and does not degrade [19,20].
Despite the absence of a hydrogen bond donor group in the molecular structure (Figure 1), PZQ shows an interesting solid-state behavior, forming a variety of multicomponent systems. Indeed, Espinosa-Lara et al. reported a series of PZQ cocrystals with different dicarboxylic acids (i.e., oxalic, malonic, succinic, maleic, fumaric, glutaric, adipic and pimelic acids) obtained via liquid-assisted grinding in a vibrational mill, using acetone or acetonitrile as the added liquids for facilitating mechanochemical synthesis. The new solid forms were fully characterized, including single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis and a full list of hydrogen bonding interactions, motifs and short contacts [17].
Here, we present a new hemihydrate of racemic PZQ, obtained through mechanochemistry. The study of hydrates is of great importance in the pharmaceutical field since several physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical properties can be affected by the insertion of water molecules in the crystal lattice [25]. Moreover, water is often present during several stages of drug manufacturing, thus hydrate formation is a very common, yet poorly understood phenomenon. It has been indeed estimated that one-third of the pharmaceutical molecules could exist as hydrates [26]. A possible explanation for the large number of hydrated forms known (representing about 11% of all structures recorded in CSD [27]) can rely on the fact that water molecules contain both donor and acceptor sites and can, therefore, create links both with itself and/or with other compounds, thus enhancing the possibility of additional intermolecular interactions. There have been some studies on the prediction of hydrate formation using computational methods, however, we are far from a prediction-only scenario [28]. Similar to other solvates, the most common situation in hydrates (about 50%) is one additional molecule for each one of the host molecules, while only 8% of the classes of hydrate are hemihydrates [28]. In a hydrate, the water molecules occupy fixed positions in the crystal lattice, either filling structural voids or being an integral part of the structure. This also implies a different moisture sorption/desorption behavior. As a consequence, hydrates are commonly classified into non-stoichiometric hydrates (frequently hosting water molecules in structural voids, subjected to reversible water uptake/release without significant changes in the crystal structure) and stoichiometric hydrates (leading to a different structure or an amorphous state after the escape of water molecules) [29,30]. Based on their structure, the hydrate nomenclature can also embrace terms like isolate-site hydrates (water molecules are isolated from direct contact), channel hydrates (containing chains of water molecules) and ion-associated hydrates (where metal ions are coordinated with water) [31].
This study reports the first hemihydrate form of racemic PZQ (PZQ-HH). Alternative ways for obtaining the new crystal form are explored; namely, a two-step mechanochemical treatment when the commercial PZQ (Form A) is used, or one-step in the case of PZQ Form B. Additionally, PZQ-HH can be also obtained in a one-step mechanochemical process starting from commercial PZQ Form A when seeds of preformed PZQ-HH (5–10% by weight) are introduced in the reaction powder. Finally, by classical slurry method, PZQ-HH can be obtained in three days if starting from Form B. A full characterization of the new solid form (i.e., polarimetry, HPLC, PXRD, SEM, HSM, DSC, TGA, SS-NMR, FT-IR, IDR, saturation solubility, in vitro activity against S. mansoni adults, and physical stability in different conditions) is performed, providing important findings for understanding the crystal features and to ascertain the relationship with other PZQ crystal forms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Commercial racemic PZQ (polymorphic Form A) of Ph. Eur. grade was a gift of Fatro S.p.A. (Bologna, Italy). Methanol and Ethanol of HPLC grade were purchased from VWR International (Milan, Italy). All the chemicals were used as received, without any further purification.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Praziquantel Hemihydrate Preparation

The mechanochemical preparation of PZQ-HH and PZQ Form B was performed in an MM400 (Retsch, Germany) vibrational mill equipped by two 35 mL zirconium oxide jars, each one containing two zirconia balls (diameter of 10 mm).
After a set of preliminary trials conducted using different amounts of water and adding water at various stages of the mechanochemical treatment, a two-step method was used for the preparation of PZQ-HH starting from the commercial form of pure PZQ. Specifically, 436 mg of PZQ Form A was initially milled under neat conditions for 30 min at 25 Hz and the intermediate product was assessed by PXRD (results are reported in Figure S1). Subsequently, the product obtained by neat grinding was processed for 1h at 25 Hz in the presence of an equimolar amount of water (corresponding to 22 µL).
The same PZQ-HH could be obtained through a one-step mechanochemical process starting from PZQ Form B. Specifically, 436 mg of anhydrous Form B and an equimolar amount of water (corresponding to 22 µL) were ground for 60 min at 25 Hz in a zirconia jar.
Another method of producing PZQ-HH consisted of the use of preformed seeds of PZQ-HH and PZQ Form A. Specifically, 414 mg of anhydrous PZQ Form A and 22 mg of PZQ-HH (corresponding to a 95:5 PZQ Form A-to-PZQ-HH wt ratio) or 392 mg of anhydrous PZQ Form A and 44 mg of PZQ-HH (corresponding to a 90:10 PZQ Form A-to-PZQ-HH wt ratio) were ground in the presence of 22 µL of water in a zirconia jar for 60 min at 25 Hz.
PZQ polymorphic Form B was prepared using a method already reported in the literature [19]. Briefly, 850 mg of PZQ Form A was milled in neat conditions for 4 h at 20 Hz, and the conversion of PZQ Form A into PZQ Form B was eventually assessed by powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and FT–IR spectroscopy, using the same conditions previously applied [19].

2.2.2. Slurry Experiments

A large excess of either commercial PZQ (Form A) or Form B was added to 1 mL of distilled water and left under stirring at room temperature for several days (1–7 days) and the solid samples were periodically checked. In particular, after filtration, the excess of solid was immediately analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction.

2.2.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetric Analyses (DSC-TGA)

For the DSC analysis, 2 mg of solid sample was introduced into a 40 μL aluminum perforated crucible and analyzed using a Mettler Toledo DSC822e (Greifensee, Switzerland) from 30–200 °C (10 °C/min) under a nitrogen atmosphere (a flow rate of 50 mL/min). For the TGA analysis about 10–15 mg of the sample was accurately weighted in a 40 μL aluminum crucible. The analyses were conducted with a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851e (Greifensee, Switzerland) using the same conditions as the above DSC procedure.

2.2.4. FT-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT–IR)

The samples were analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer System 2000 FT–IR instrument (Norwalk, CT, U.S.) in a range of 400–4000 cm−1 after being gently ground in an agate mortar with anhydrous KBr (in a 1:15 ratio by wt) and pressed into a disc with a hydraulic press. The resolution used was 4 cm−1 with a step of 1 cm−1 and a scan number of three.

2.2.5. Polarimetry and Drug Recovery

The optical rotations of the samples dissolved in ethanol (1 g/100 mL) were recorded at 25 °C, λ = 589 nm using a Jasco P2000 Polarimeter (Lecco, Italy), according to a method already reported [9,19,32]. The use of ethanol instead of CHCl3 permitted an easier preparation of the samples without air bubbles in the cell.
For the determination of drug content, the HPLC apparatus was an Agilent HPLC-UV 1260 Infinity II (Santa Clara, CA, US) with a column EC-C18 Poroshell 120 Å of 4 µm and the dimensions of 4.6 × 10 mm. The analyses were performed at a controlled temperature of 25 °C, with a mobile phase composed of methanol:water (65:35 v/v) and with a flux of 0.750 mL/min. A fixed wavelength of 220 nm was used for detection. The peaks were integrated using the external standardization method for quantification. The total run time was 10 min and PZQ retention time was about 7.7 min. Prior to sample analyses, a calibration curve of PZQ in the range of 0.5–10 mg/L was established (r2 of 0.9988). Each time before the analysis a standard solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of PZQ in 20 mL of methanol and analyzed in the HPLC system after dilution with the mobile phase (1:200). The standard solution had a concentration of 2.5 mg/L.

2.2.6. Hot Stage Microscopy (HSM)

A hot stage microscopy apparatus (Mettler-Toledo Ltd., (Greifensee, Switzerland) was used for the observation of the samples by taking movies upon heating from 25–150 °C using a dedicated ocular and software. The images were collected through a micro ocular MD-300 and Webcam Companion software.

2.2.7. Powder X-ray Diffraction

Powder X-ray diffraction routine analyses were performed using a Panalytical X’Pert Pro Diffractometer (Panalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) composed of a RTMS X’celerator detector and with Cu Kα radiation without monochromator (1.5418 Å). The analyses were conducted in a 2θ range of 3°–40° with a step size of 0.0334° and a scan speed of 0.142°/s. Each sample was prepared by gently pressing a sufficient amount of powder with a glass slide into the cavity of a sample holder to give a flat surface.
Data collection for the purpose of crystal structure determination of PZQ-HH was performed on a capillary powder diffractometer. The powder sample was mounted in a 0.3 mm borosilicate glass capillary and rotated in the beam during collection. A STOE STADIP transmission diffractometer, and a Mythen1k detector with an 18° 2θ angular range was used. The pattern was collected at RT temperature using a monochromatic Cu Kα1 radiation (1.54056 Å) at 40 kV, 30 mA, from a focusing Ge(111) primary beam monochromator, from 2°–70° 2θ, stepping at 0.1° and 15 s per step.

2.2.8. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Form A, Form B and the hemihydrate were observed using a JEOL JSM-5510LV scanning electron microscope (Welwyn, UK) after being metalized with gold with a sputter coater. Selected samples were observed by environmental scanning electron microscopy using a Quanta 200 FEI-XRF (Felmi-ZFE, Graz, Austria) embedded instrument.

2.2.9. Solid-State NMR

Solid-state NMR measurements were acquired on a Jeol ECZR 600 instrument (Akishima City, Tokyo, JP), operating at 600.17 and 150.91 MHz for the 1H and 13C nuclei, respectively. Powder samples were packed in 3.2 mm diameter cylindrical zirconia rotors with the volume of 60 µL. A certain amount of sample was taken and used without further preparation from each batch to fill the rotor. 13C CPMAS spectra were acquired at a spinning speed of 20 kHz with a RAMP-CP pulse sequence (90° 1H pulse of 2.2 µs; contact time of 3.5 ms), a recycle time of 38.1 s and 280 scans. The two-pulse phase modulation (TPPM) decoupling scheme with a 119.0 kHz radiofrequency field was used during the acquisition period. 13C chemical shifts were referenced to α-glycine (13C methylene signal at 43.5 ppm).

2.2.10. Crystal Structure Determination from Powder X-ray Diffraction Data

The PXRD pattern of PZQ hemihydrate material was indexed using the N-TREOR algorithm [33] via an interface of EXPO2014 [34]. The indexing procedure revealed a triclinic unit cell with the volume of 860.2 Å3, which corresponds to two PZQ molecules per unit cell. Since the hemihydrate material was prepared from a racemic anhydrous PZQ, the structure solution was attempted in a centrosymmetric P-1 space group. The structure was solved using the simulated annealing procedure implemented in EXPO2014 [34]. The asymmetric unit contained one PZQ molecule and one oxygen atom corresponding to one water molecule. Structure solution processing involved a large number of randomized steps where translational (for both PZQ and water oxygen) and rotation (PZQ only) degrees of freedom were varied. In addition, intramolecular rotation around the flexible bonds was allowed. The PZQ fragment was given full occupancy, while the water oxygen occupancy was fixed at 0.5, reflecting the experimentally determined stoichiometry of the material. Rietveld refinement [35] of the structure was performed in TOPAS Academic 4.1 [36]. In addition to the translational, rotational and intramolecular degrees of freedom, zero-point shift, peak shape function and background polynomial were refined. The diffraction peak shape was described by a pseudo-Voigt function, while the background was fitted with a 12-term Chebyshev polynomial function. The occupancy parameter of the water oxygen atom was allowed to refine, and the occupancy remained close to the expected value of 0.5. In the final refinement, oxygen occupancy was once again constrained to 0.5, and two hydrogen atoms were inserted in the most probable positions, corresponding to the hydrogen bond directions towards the carbonyl oxygen of PZQ. The resulting structural model reveals that the water molecule is disordered over an inversion center with a 50:50 chance. Crystallographic parameters of the hemihydrate structure are summarized in Table S1.

2.2.11. Periodic DFT Calculations

Periodic DFT calculations were performed using the plane-wave DFT code CASTEP 16.1 [37]. Crystal structures of polymorphs of anhydrous PZQ (A and B), as well as the racemic hemihydrate structures, were geometry optimized with the aim of calculating the relative stability of these crystal forms. The experimental crystal structures were converted in CASTEP format with the help of cif2cell [38] utility. The DFT calculations were performed using semi-local PBE [39] functional combined with a Grimme D2 [40] semiempirical dispersion correction. The plane wave basis set was truncated at a 700 eV cutoff, and the norm-conserving pseudopotentials were used to modify the Coulomb potential in the core regions of electron density. The electronic Brillouin zone was sampled with a 0.03 Å-1 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid [41]. Geometry optimization involved variation of atom coordinates and unit cell parameters subject to the symmetry constraints of the corresponding space groups. The following convergence criteria were used: maximum energy change 10−5 eV per atom, maximum force on atom 0.01 eV Å−1, maximum atom displacement 0.001 Å and residual stress 0.05 GPa.
The DFT-optimized crystal structure was used to assess the accuracy of experimental crystal structure determination from PXRD data. The overlay between the optimized and experimental structures revealed a root mean square Cartesian displacement (RMSCD) value of 0.136 Å, which is well within the limits of what is considered a correct structure determination [42].

2.2.12. Modeling of Solid-State NMR Spectra

The optimized crystal structures were used for modeling solid-state NMR spectra. NMR parameters were calculated using the CASTEP implementation of GIPAW method [43]. The calculations used PBE semi-local functional, with a plane-wave basis set truncated at a 1000 eV cutoff. Core regions of electron density were described using on-the-fly generated ultrasoft pseudopotentials [44]. The calculated chemical shieldings were converted into chemical shifts using a reference shielding of 170 ppm. The spectral lines were drawn with Lorentzian curves with 1 ppm HWHM.

2.2.13. Saturation Solubility and Intrinsic Dissolution Rate (IDR)

The solubility of the samples in water was analyzed by preparing 10 mL of saturated solutions of each sample in deionized water that were kept in the dark under agitation for 48 h until equilibrium. Then, the solutions were filtered using a membrane (pore size = 0.45 μm) and diluted 1:200 with the mobile phase prior to injection into the HPLC system. The HPLC methodology used for the quantification was reported in Section 2.2.5. For the intrinsic dissolution rate determination, about 150 mg of the samples were inserted in the sample holder and pressed using a hydraulic press (PerkinElmer, Norwalk, U.S.) for 1 min at 1 ton. No solid-state transitions have occurred due to compaction under these conditions, as verified by PXRD analyses (Figure S2). The sample surface area obtained was of 0.785 cm2 and the entire sample holder with the compressed powder was immersed in a vessel containing 1 L of distilled water kept at 37 °C. The system used was a Hanson Research SR8 Plus (Chatsworth, CA, U.S.) dissolution test station and the paddles were positioned 3.5 cm from the tablet surface, with a rotation speed of 100 rpm. About 2 mL of the dissolution medium were withdrawn every ten minutes until 60 min and immediately replaced with an equal amount of thermo-stated distilled water. The aliquots were then diluted 1:20 with the mobile phase and analyzed using the same above-mentioned method. The analyses were performed in triplicate and for each point and the mean with SD (%) and RSD (%) were calculated. The amount of dissolved drug per unit area over time was indicated by the slope of the curves, obtained through a linear regression method (r2 > 0.99 in all cases). For the comparison of the different curve the one-way ANOVA test was used, and the data were considered statistically different where the p value < 0.05.

2.2.14. In Vitro Activity

The in vitro activity of PZQ-HH was tested using adult S. mansoni. The study was approved by the local veterinary agency, based on Swiss cantonal and national regulations (permission no. 2070). At least three adult worms (both sexes) obtained from dissecting S. mansoni infected mice were incubated with RPMI 1640 (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% (v/v) pen–strep at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 72 h for each concentration tested ranging from 0.021–0.33 μg/L. By using an inverse microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany, magnification 80×) and viability based on all the alterations of morphology, motility and viability were recorded and the IC50 value was calculated with CompuSyn software (ComboSyn Inc., Paramus, NJ., U.S.).

2.2.15. Physical Stability under Several Conditions

Several batches of PZQ-HH were kept at room temperature in closed containers, protected from light over a period of several months. Its physical state was periodically analyzed using PXRD.
Further, PZQ-HH physical stability upon thermal and mechanical treatment was tested. In particular, PZQ-HH was heated at a constant temperature of 50 °C under vacuum over-night and the obtained product was assessed by means of PXRD. PZQ-HH was subjected to 30–80 °C dynamical heating and analyzed by in situ PXRD. Finally, PZQ-HH was ground for 60 min at 25 Hz and again assayed by PXRD.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanochemical Preparation of PZQ-HH Using PZQ Form A as Starting Material

Initially, PZQ Form A was processed through liquid assisted grinding (LAG) in the presence of water. The solid products recovered from these experiments did not present structural changes and pure anhydrous PZQ Form A was the only solid form observed. Further trials conducted by varying milling frequency, time or water amount also resulted in pure anhydrous PZQ Form A. Slurry experiments in water also produced anhydrous PZQ Form A, i.e., the same polymorph as the starting PZQ. Representative PXRD patterns of some products are reported in Figures S3 and S4. The nature of the polymorphs in the solid product at the end of each process is summarized in Table 1.
Conversely, a new solid form was obtained when operating in a two-step mechanochemical method. In particular, Form A was initially milled in neat conditions for 30 min at 25 Hz. As assessed by PXRD (Figure S1) the product obtained at this point is a low-crystallinity material, with a remarkable amorphous halo in the background, with some residual peaks of Form A and some signals attributed to Form B. Subsequently the grinding process was stopped to introduce water and restarted for a further 60 min at 25 Hz. It is worthy of notice that also, in this case, every change in the quantity of water inserted led to the same solid form: after 60 min of grinding in the presence of water, the complete transformation to the new solid phase was achieved. The material obtained from this grinding condition was a racemic hemihydrate, that will be later described and fully characterized.
The PXRD pattern of PZQ-HH was completely different from the already known PZQ structures, as shown in Figure 2, in which the reader can also find the calculated pattern of the enantiomeric hemihydrate (indexed as SIGBUG [15] in the CSD), Form B, Form C and Form A; the characteristic reflections of PZQ-HH were found at 6.28°, 16.14°, 16.50°, 17.18°, 18.67°, 19.12°, 20.05°, 20.41° and 24.37° in 2θ.

3.2. Mechanochemical Preparation of PZQ-HH Using PZQ Form B as Starting Material

When PZQ Form B was used as a starting material, PZQ-HH formed in a one-step process and the preliminary neat grinding stage was not necessary. Additional LAG experiments using different amounts of water led to the same solid form, suggesting that, in the present case the amount of water does not drive the formation of a hydrate with higher water stoichiometry. Since it has been reported that, in a given solvate-forming system, it is possible to access different stoichiometric forms by simply changing the amount of liquid during the mechanochemical formation of solvates [45], it can be speculated that in the case of PZQ and water the only (energetically) accessible stoichiometry is the 1:0.5 molar ratio (hemihydrate). Slurry experiments of Form B in water also gave PZQ-HH (Table 1, Figure S4).

3.3. Mechanochemical Preparation of PZQ-HH Starting with PZQ Form A and Seeds of Preformed PZQ-HH

When PZQ Form A/PZQ-HH (95:5 or 90:10 by wt) mixtures were used as a starting powder, after 60 min of grinding at 25 Hz in the presence of water, complete transformation of the solid in PZQ-HH was achieved (Table 1, Figure 3). A one-step process in the presence of seeds of preformed PZQ-HH was hence enough to promote the formation of PZQ-HH and the preliminary neat grinding stage was not necessary.

3.4. Characterizations of PZQ-HH and Crystal Structure Solution

To fully comprehend the often complex behavior of a mechanochemical-prepared hydrate a multidisciplinary investigation is paramount. This would include chemical, thermal, structural, spectroscopic, morphological, biopharmaceutical and stability evaluations. Since this is a new solid hydrated form, a thorough characterization of PZQ-HH was carried out and phase interrelations to the known PZQ polymorphs were studied.

3.4.1. Chemical Analyses

To ensure the racemic nature of PZQ in the hemihydrate, polarimetric analyses were performed on different samples and compared to Form A: the mean [α]λ value registered for PZQ-HH was 0.02 ± 0.06, perfectly corresponding to a racemic compound, as in the case of the commercially available Form A ([α] of 0.5 ± 2.9). HPLC results showed a complete drug recovery after mechanical treatment, attesting the lack of chemical changes in PZQ. This means that when PZQ is ground in the presence of little amounts of water (equimolar) does not degrade, similarly to what was noted when grinding PZQ alone [19,20], but unlike what was seen in the presence of polymeric excipients [22,23,24]. This also highlights that the presence of water, at least in little amounts during milling does not favor chemical degradation, even though water is known to be a factor affecting PZQ chemical stability [22]. It is worth noting that no mechanochromism phenomenon was noticed at the end of the process and the final product was a white powder.

3.4.2. Crystal Structure Solution

The crystal structure of PZQ-HH was solved from the capillary powder X-ray diffraction pattern following the method previously described (paragraph 2.2.10): the space group P-1 of PZQ-HH was the same as Form A; however, 1 molecule is present in the asymmetric unit of PZQ-HH, rather than 4, as in TELCEU. Compared to the enantiomeric hemihydrate (SIGBUG), in this case, every water molecule in PZQ-HH is connected with two PZQ entities, one R- and one S-, through hydrogen bonds, as reported in Figure 4.
The Rietveld refinement fit of the experimental pattern with the calculated one is reported in Figure 5. The refined unit cell had the following parameters: space group P-1, cell lengths (Å) of a = 5.857, b = 10.921 and c = 14.299; cell angles of α = 105.755°, β = 94.622°, γ = 99.564°; volume (Å3) of 860.342; density of 1.24 g cm–3.
PZQ does not have any H-bond donor group, thus these interactions are possible thanks to the presence of the oxygen atoms acting as acceptors since the nitrogen electron pair is engaged in the electron delocalization, as it was also reported in the literature [17]. Observing the packing of the unit cell of the new racemic hemihydrate and the enantiomeric one (Figure 4), in both cases the PZQ molecules are inversely positioned and linked to the water molecule between them. The difference is in the oxygen involved in such bonds: in PZQ-HH the molecules are linked via an Ow-H···O=Cet hydrogen bond, while in the enantiomeric hemihydrate the oxygen bonded to the water is the cyclohexylic one (the oxygen atom linked with the cyclohexyl group), creating an Ow-H···O=Ccy hydrogen bond. Concerning conformation, while the starting PZQ has the syn conformation, in the PZQ-HH anti-conformation was observed. Of note, the same anti-conformation was found in both Form B and C [19,20]. Moreover, the water molecules are not linked to each other but are instead connected with the drug molecule, meaning that the new PZQ-HH belongs to the isolated-site hydrates [31,46].

3.4.3. Thermal Analyses

The DSC curve (Figure 6) presented a sharp dehydration endotherm in a narrow weight loss range, in comparison to other solid systems containing water: this was expected for isolated site hydrates as the new PZQ-HH, according also to the literature [46]. This sharp endothermic dehydration at about 68 °C (61.38 J/g) was confirmed by weight loss in the TGA, which was 2.19% and in good agreement with the theoretical value of 2.73% for a hemihydrate. Notably, at the TGA the water loss started from the beginning of the analysis at room temperature. Other endothermic events were recorded at the DSC at 109.05 °C and 133.95 °C with an enthalpy of fusion of 10.25 J/g and 32.49 J/g that were identified as melting events of Form B [19] and Form A [22], respectively.
Hot stage microscopy analysis shows that PZQ-HH collapses at around 68–75 °C, forming a liquid phase. This event is followed by a partial recrystallization of Form B and its melting at around 110 °C [19], after which a partial recrystallization of the native Form A can be seen ending in the final melting around 135–138 °C, as reported in Figure S5.

3.4.4. Experimental and GIPAW-DFT Calculated 13C CPMAS SS-NMR Spectra

The 13C CPMAS SS-NMR spectrum of PZQ-HH was compared to the anhydrous polymorphs Form A, B, and C reported in Figure 7. The analysis confirmed the formation of a new pure phase different from the previous, the presence of only one molecule in the asymmetric unit (due to the single set of signals compared to the multiple ones of Form A) and a lower crystallinity of the sample (FWHM ~150 Hz) with respect to the other forms (FWHM ~90–100 Hz). Also, the experimental data match the GIPAW-DFT calculated one, as reported in Figure S6 and in Table 2 compared to that of Form A, B, and C, with a root mean square error of 1.8 ppm. This overall value represents the agreement between the computed 13C chemical shifts of the powder X-ray structure and those obtained experimentally, and it is much better than those reported in the literature for correct structures (around 2.2 ppm) [47]. This confirms the reliability of the structure solved from PXRD data.

3.4.5. FT–IR Spectroscopy

The FT–IR spectrum of PZQ-HH, compared to pure PZQ Form A and Form B, is shown in Figure 8. Differently from the anhydrous forms, PZQ-HH presents a sharper OH band at 3543 cm−1 (indicated by the frame). This sharp OH stretching band is also in accordance with the previously mentioned isolate class of hydrates [46]. In the typical range of C=O stretching (see the frame in Figure 8), a single broad band is observed at 1629 cm−1 of PZQ-HH, confirming the intermolecular interaction between the drug and water via PZQ carbonyl groups. It also shows the C=Oet is shifted by about 22 cm−1 in comparison to Form A, while the C=Ocy, involved in the hydrogen bond, is not visible. The signal at 758 cm−1 (highlighted by the frame), corresponding to the bending of the aromatic –CH, is superimposable to that of Form B, whilst it was at 765 cm−1 for Form A. This is in agreement with previously reported SS-NMR assignments for Cq attesting high similarities between Form B and PZQ-HH, while having significant differences from Form A.

3.4.6. Morphological Analyses

From electron microscopy analyses, the new solid form consisted of agglomerates of large plates, assuming a porous aspect with a broad specific surface area (Figure 9). The particle size of the powder varies in the range 40–100 µm. This morphology is clearly distinguishable from the reported needle-shaped particles of starting Form A [22], from the whiskers in Form B and Form C clusters of particles, even though these latter were also obtained by mechanochemistry [19,20].

3.4.7. Saturation Solubility, IDR and Antischistosomal Activity

PZQ-HH demonstrated excellent biopharmaceutical properties, since the water solubility (after 48 h at 25 °C) was of 310.89 ± 3.07 mg/L, while for Form A was 217 ± 10.33 mg/L. The intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR), as reported in Figure 10, was twice that of the commercially available Form A. In fact, a value of 0.0618 ± 0.0051 mg/cm2/min was found for PZQ-HH, while the raw drug showed an intrinsic dissolution rate of 0.0299 ± 0.031 mg/cm2/min. A similar feature was attested for Form B, as previously reported [19], and the statistical comparison between the Form B value and that of the new hemihydrate did not reveal any significant difference, which was conversely detected when comparing the IDR of PZQ-HH with the one of Form A.
The hemihydrate form was assayed for its activity in vitro against S. mansoni adults: it exhibited an IC50 of 0.15 μM, identical to commercially available Form A (IC50 of 0.1. μM) [48].

3.5. Physical Stability under Various Conditions

PZQ-HH, kept at ambient temperature in closed vials, was physically stable for three months. After this period, PXRD revealed that Form B started appearing, while there were no signals referable to Form A (as visible in Figure 11).
Milling of PZQ-HH slightly decreased peak intensities and after 60 min at 25 Hz the PXRD pattern showed a complete transition from PZQ-HH to Form B (Figure 11 reports the intermediate product at 30 min).
To check stress-induced transformations, PZQ-HH was left at 50 °C, under vacuum (35 mmHg) overnight. Again, Form B was obtained as demonstrated by PXRD and ESEM analyses (both reported in Figure 12). In particular, the habitus of the dehydrated product sample was very similar to that of Form B, with typical agglomerates of whiskers.
Finally, variable-temperature in situ PXRD was carried out for PZQ-HH, to online monitor changes of the solid product upon heating. The results, reported in Figure S7, confirm a gradual dehydration and a complete transformation to Form B at 60 °C. Whereupon anhydrous Form B remained stable until the end of the analysis (80 °C).
Once again we address the reader to Table 1 for the nature of the polymorphs detected in the solid product at the end of each process.
To assess the thermodynamic aspects of transformations of crystal forms of PZQ we have compared the energies of the structures obtained in periodic DFT calculations. The racemic PZQ-HH phase has been found as 1.8 kJ mol−1 lower in energy than the known enantiomeric hemihydrate phase (CSD SIGBUG, SIGBUG01). The lower energy of the racemic phase explains its preferential formation from the racemic PZQ, as opposed to a 50:50 conglomerate of R and S crystals of the enantiomeric form.
In addition to comparing the lattice stabilities of the two hemihydrate phases, we have calculated the dehydration energy of PZQ-HH towards the anhydrous polymorphs (A and B) of PZQ. In the case of anhydrous PZQ Form B the process was found to be endothermic with an energy of +39.4 kJ mol–1. For comparison, the dehydration energy for the formation of anhydrous Form A was found to be less endothermic at +31 kJ mol–1. This confirms that Form B is a metastable polymorph, the formation of which under experimental conditions must be explained by kinetic, rather than thermodynamic factors.

4. Discussion

The present study shows that the identity of PZQ crystal form used as the starting material in the mechanochemical formation of PZQ-HH affects the course of the reaction. As mentioned above, PZQ-HH can only be obtained from anhydrous Form A via a two-step grinding mixed process using initially neat and subsequently LAG conditions in water. The first neat step involves the formation of a mainly amorphous intermediate. Amorphous solids are usually very hygroscopic, and the presence of moisture is a key factor for recrystallization. Recrystallization of the amorphous intermediate product as a hemihydrate is therefore expected since the kinetic barrier is significantly reduced. Hence, if water is added to this mixture in a subsequent step of grinding, after the formation of the amorphous intermediate, the reaction evolves to the formation of PZQ-HH. It is noteworthy, and rather counterintuitive, that milling PZQ Form A directly with water results in no hydration. Differently, single-step LAG of PZQ in water results in the hemihydrate when the reactant is PZQ Form B, possibly related to the structural similarity between the two forms, as better addressed below. The present findings add to the recent studies involving real-time in situ grinding experiments, which show that mechanochemical reactions may present different mechanistic steps and intermediates [49,50,51].
A classic example of how the nature of the starting materials plays a role in the mechanochemical reaction outcome is the case of the cocrystallization of caffeine and citric acid [52]. The case of PZQ-HH, on the other hand, is special not because of the presence of water in the reaction powder per se but because of the structural differences between the conformation of PZQ molecules in the lattice of Form A (syn) compared to the conformation in Form B and the hemihydrate (anti). As presented in Figure 13, PZQ-HH and anhydrous PZQ Form B present a high similarity in their crystal structures, which goes beyond the molecular conformation. We speculate that the activation energy required to rotate the molecules into different conformers is a high kinetic barrier for this mechanochemical reaction. This hypothesis also explains why the preparation of PZQ-HH via LAG with water is a direct process either when PZQ Form B is in the reaction vessel or when Form A is seeded with preformed PZQ-HH prior to grinding. The presence of seeds offers an energetically accessible template on which to grow the new solid phase [53], driving the product towards the seeded hydrated form. Similarly, it is likely that the surfaces of Form B particles provide this energetically accessible support, which overcomes the kinetic barrier related to conformer switching [19].
The slurry experiments also confirm this previous hypothesis, provided that slurrying Form A in water results in unchanged material throughout the experiment. It shows that the formation of PZQ-HH is kinetically hindered when starting from Form A regardless of the maximum water activity in solution. Differently, when PZQ Form B is subjected to slurry experiments, the anti-conformer may facilitate the interaction and the transformation into the new hemihydrate phase.
The relationships between PZQ anhydrous polymorphs and the hemihydrate were also assessed from the dehydration of PZQ-HH under different environmental conditions. The reaction follows the Ostwald rule of stages as PZQ-HH dehydrates into the metastable Form B, rather than the most stable Form A [54]. In this case, neither during storage under room conditions, nor during mechanical or thermal treatments was there evidence of a direct transition to the stable Form A. As for the relationship among PZQ-HH and Form C, in no case was the formation of the polymorph C observed from the hemihydrate. Once again, the similar packing arrangement of PZQ molecules in Form B explains the formation of this polymorph as a kinetically-preferred dehydration product, even though Form A would be the thermodynamically most favorable product. The syn-anti-conformational modification might be the source of the energy barrier that hinders the formation of Form A from dehydration. A possible polymorph interconversion, previously noticed with other single and multicomponent polymorphic systems either through neat [55] or LAG [56] can be hypothesized also in the PZQ-HH/Form B pair. In terms of solubility and IDR, PZQ-HH showed an unusual and favorable biopharmaceutical performance, which is superior to that of anhydrous Form A. PZQ-HH can hence be part of the list of peculiar hydrates, together with the well-known erythromycin dihydrate [57] and tranilast [58]. Those crystal forms counteract the general rule that an anhydrous form is usually more soluble in water than the hydrated form. The enhancement in drug solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate of PZQ-HH can be explained because the water molecules may act as a wedge pushing the PZQ molecules apart, challenging their interaction in the crystal and weakening the structure. Additional reasons for the solubility behavior of PZQ-HH can be hypothesized. From one side, the anti-conformation creates wider voids between the molecules which have proven to favor the solubility enhancement of Form B [19] and Form C [20]. Secondly, PZQ has a higher propensity to interact via hydrogen bonds when in an anti-conformation. Last but not least, one can expect a crystal form modification when PZQ Form B is in contact with water. In fact, the saturation solubility and dissolution profiles of PZQ-HH and Form B were almost identical between the two forms, suggesting a possible very rapid conversion. These facts were confirmed by the observation of the same conversion of PZQ-HH into the Form B during storage at room temperature/pressure after three months, and after few hours upon heating under vacuum, and finally by the in situ PXRD upon heating. This evidence underlined the close relationship between Form B and PZQ-HH, despite the existence of Form A and C, and the ease of transition from one phase to the other.

5. Conclusions

White bulk powder of racemic praziquantel hemihydrate was prepared for the first time, by a mechanochemical method. The hemihydrate structure was solved from PXRD pattern and validated by periodic-DFT calculations: the refined unit cell had the following parameters: space group P-1, cell lengths (Å) of a = 5.857, b = 10.921, c = 14.299; cell angles of α = 105.755°, β = 94.622°, γ = 99.564°; volume (Å3) of 860.342; density of 1.24 g·cm−3. Due to the novelty of this racemic praziquantel hemihydrate, a complete physico-chemical characterization was performed, by using HPLC, DSC, TGA, HSM, PXRD, SEM, FTIR, polarimetry, solid-state NMR, solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate, and in vitro tests on S. mansoni adults. These analyses provided important findings for understanding the crystal features and highlighted that the hemihydrate maintains unaltered the antischistosomal activity and its physical state for three months at room temperature. Last but not least, both PZQ-HH aqueous solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate are largely superior to those of the commercially available Form A, counteracting the general rule that an anhydrous form is usually more soluble in water than the hydrated form.
A further important finding of this research is that the identity of PZQ crystal form used as starting material in the mechanochemical formation of PZQ-HH affects the course of the reaction. Single-step LAG of PZQ in water results in the hemihydrate when the reactant is PZQ anhydrous Form B, whereas PZQ-HH can only be obtained from anhydrous Form A via a two-step grinding mixed process using firstly, neat and subsequently, LAG conditions with water. The close relationship between PZQ-HH and anhydrous PZQ Form B can be traced to the similarity of the two crystal structures, which goes beyond the molecular conformation. Due to this similarity, Form B is more likely to support the nucleation of the hemihydrate phase, explaining the easier formation of the hemihydrate phase from this anhydrous polymorph. Similarly, in the case of dehydration of PZQ-HH, the similar packing arrangement of PZQ molecules in Form B explains the formation of this polymorph as a kinetically-preferred dehydration product, even though Form A would be the thermodynamically most favorable product.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at Figure S1. PXRD pattern of (a) PZQ Form A and (b) sample obtained after 30 min of neat grinding (25 Hz). Figure S2. PXRD pattern of (a) PZQ-HH after compression in a hydraulic press and (b) fresh PZQ-HH. Figure S3. LAG experiments (30 min, 25 Hz) on Form A (raw PZQ) with different amounts of deionized water: with 10, 40, 60 and 100 μL of water. Figure S4. PXRD patterns of the solid residues after slurry in water of (a) PZQ Form A for 7 days and (b) PZQ Form B for 3 days. Figure S5. Hot-stage microscopy images for PZQ-HH. Figure S6. Comparison of experimental and calculated 13C SS-NMR spectrum of PZQ-HH. Figure S7. In situ PXRD of PZQ-HH upon heating from ambient temperature (top) to 80 °C (penultimate pattern). The progressive transition from PZQ-HH to Form B is visible. Further, Form B is stable at 80 °C: the pattern recorded at 25 °C (bottom) is superimposable to that of Form B. Table S1. Crystallographic parameters of the PZQ-HH structure determined from PXRD data. CCDC 1530464 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for racemic praziquantel hemihydrate (PZQ-HH) (These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via

Author Contributions

Investigation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing—original draft preparation: D.Z., G.S.-R., M.A., J.K., M.R.C., D.H., B.P.; Writing—review & editing: D.Z., B.P., D.V., W.J., D.H., M.A., M.R.C. and J.K., Supervision: B.P., D.V. and W.J.; Project administration: B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.


D.Z. thanks Erasmus plus for traineeship for her placement at the Department of Chemistry at Cambridge (UK). A special thanks to Nadia Passerini and Beatrice Albertini ( for their precious advices, to Elisabetta Giron for her kind cooperation, and to Fatro S.p.A. for the gift of the raw praziquantel. G.S.R. thanks the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel CAPES-Brazil and the Cambridge Overseas Trust COT-UK for her PhD scholarship (CsF BEX 9530/13-4). J.K. is grateful to the European Research Council (ERC) (grant number, ERC-2013-CoG 614739-A_HERO).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. World Health Organization. Available online: (assessed on 14 February 2020).
  2. Colley, D.G.; Bustinduy, A.L.; Secor, W.E.; King, C.H. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2014, 383, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gryseels, B.; Polman, K.; Clerinx, J.; Kestens, L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2006, 368, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sousa-Figueiredo, J.C.; Betson, M.; Stothard, J.R. Treatment of schistosomiasis in African infants and preschool-aged children: Downward extension and biometric optimization of the current praziquantel dose pole. Int. Health 2012, 4, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. El-Arini, S.K.; Leuenberger, H. Dissolution properties of praziquantel-PVP systems. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1998, 73, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stelma, F.F.; Talla, I.; Sow, S.; Kongs, A.; Niang, M.; Polman, K.; Deelder, A.M.; Gryseels, B. Efficacy and side effects of praziquantel in an epidemic focus of Schistosoma mansoni. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 53, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dayan, A.D. Albendazole, mebendazole and praziquantel. Review of non-clinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Acta Trop. 2003, 86, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO Informal Consultation on the use of praziquantel during pregnancy/lactation and albendazole/mebendazole in children under 24 months. 2002. Available online: (accessed on 4 March 2020).
  9. Cedillo-Cruz, A.; Aguilar, M.I.; Flores-Alamo, M.; Palomares-Alonso, F.; Jung-Cook, H. A straightforward and efficient synthesis of praziquantel enantiomers and their 4′-hydroxy derivatives. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2014, 25, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meister, I.; Ingram-Sieber, K.; Cowan, N.; Todd, M.; Robertson, M.N.; Meli, C.; Patra, M.; Gasser, G.; Keiser, J. Activity of praziquantel enantiomers and main metabolites against Schistosoma mansoni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5466–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kovač, J.; Vargas, M.; Keiser, J. In vitro and in vivo activity of R- and S-praziquantel enantiomers and the main human metabolite trans-4-hydroxy-praziquantel against Schistosoma haematobium. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bagchus, W.M.; Bezuidenhout, D.; Harrison-Moench, E.; Kourany-Lefoll, E.; Wolna, P.; Yalkinoglu, O. Relative bioavailability of orally dispersible tablet formulations of levo- and racemic praziquantel: Two phase I studies. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2019, 12, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, D.; Wang, H.; Ji, J.; Nie, L.; Sun, D. A quantification method for determination of racemate Praziquantel and R-enantiomer in rat plasma for comparison of their pharmacokinetics. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2017, 1048, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Meyer, T.; Sekljic, H.; Fuchs, S.; Bothe, H.; Schollmeyer, D.; Miculka, C. Taste, a new incentive to switch to (R)-praziquantel in schistosomiasis treatment. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.K.; Ching, C.B. Investigation of the phase diagrams of chiral praziquantel. Chirality 1993, 18, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, M.H.; Wei, C.C.; Xu, Z.Y.; Yuan, H.C.; Lian, W.N.; Yang, Q.J.; Chen, M.; Jiang, Q.W.; Wang, C.Z.; Zhang, S.J.; et al. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of a single dose of levo-praziquantel with mixed isomer praziquantel in 278 cases of schistosomiasis japonica. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 45, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Espinosa-Lara, J.C.; Guzman-Villanueva, D.; Arenas-García, J.I.; Herrera-Ruiz, D.; Rivera-Islas, J.; Román-Bravo, P.; Morales-Rojas, H.; Höpfl, H. Cocrystals of active pharmaceutical ingredients praziquantel in combination with oxalic, malonic, succinic, maleic, fumaric, glutaric, adipic, and pimelic acids. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 169–185. [Google Scholar]
  18. Groom, C.R.; Bruno, I.J.; Lightfoot, M.P.; Ward, S.C. The Cambridge structural database. Acta Crystallogr. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 2016, 72, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zanolla, D.; Perissutti, B.; Passerini, N.; Chierotti, M.R.; Hasa, D.; Voinovich, D.; Gigli, L.; Demitri, N.; Geremia, S.; Keiser, J.; et al. A new soluble and bioactive polymorph of Praziquantel. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2018, 127, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zanolla, D.; Perissutti, B.; Cerreia Vioglio, P.; Chierotti, M.R.; Gigli, L.; Demitri, N.; Passerini, N.; Albertini, B.; Franceschinis, E.; Keiser, J.; et al. Exploring mechanochemical parameters using a DoE approach: Crystal structure solution from synchrotron XRPD and characterization of a new praziquantel polymorph. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 140, 105084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salazar-Rojas, D.; Maggio, R.M.; Kaufman, T.S. Preparation and characterization of a new solid form of praziquantel, an essential anthelmintic drug. Praziquantel racemic monohydrate. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 105267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Perissutti, B.; Passerini, N.; Trastullo, R.; Keiser, J.; Zanolla, D.; Zingone, G.; Voinovich, D.; Albertini, B. An explorative analysis of process and formulation variables affecting comilling in a vibrational mill: The case of Praziquantel. J. Pharm. 2017, 553, 402–412. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zanolla, D.; Perissutti, B.; Passerini, N.; Invernizzi, S.; Voinovich, D.; Bertoni, S.; Melegari, C.; Milotti, G.; Albertini, B. Milling and comilling Praziquantel at cryogenic and room temperatures: Assessment of the process-induced effects on drug properties. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 153, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Šagud, I.; Zanolla, D.; Perissutti, B.; Passerini, N.; Škorić, I. Identification of degradation products of praziquantel during the mechanochemical activation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 159, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khankari, R.K.; Grant, D.J.W. Pharmaceutical hydrates. Thermochim. Acta 1995, 248, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Franklin, S.J.; Younis, U.S.; Myrdal, P.B. Estimating the aqueous solubility of pharmaceutical hydrates. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 1914–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Morris, K.R. Structural aspects of hydrates and solvates. In Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids; Brittain, H.G., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 125–181. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bajpai, A.; Scott, H.S.; Pham, T.; Chen, K.-J.; Space, B.; Lusi, M.; Perry, M.L.; Zaworotko, M.J. Towards an understanding of the propensity for crystalline hydrate formation by molecular compounds. IUCrJ 2016, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gal, S. Phenomenological study of water vapor sorption isotherms of solid sorbents. Chimia 1968, 22, 409–425. [Google Scholar]
  30. Griesser, U.J. The importance of solvates. In Polymorphism: In the Pharmaceutical Industry; Hilfiker, R., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp. 211–233. [Google Scholar]
  31. Braun, D.E.; Griesser, U.J. Supramolecular organization of nonstoichiometric drug hydrates: Dapsone. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roszkowski, P.; Maurin, J.K.; Czarnocki, Z. Enantioselective synthesis of (R)-(−)-praziquantel (PZQ). Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2006, 17, 1415–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Altomare, A.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A.G.G.; Rizzi, R.; Werner, P.-E. New Techniques for Indexing: N-TREOR in EXPO. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Altomare, A.; Cuocci, C.; Giacovazzo, C.; Moliterni, A.; Rizzi, R.; Corriero, N.; Falcicchio, A. EXPO2013: A kit of tools for phasing crystal structures from powder data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2013, 46, 1231–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rietveld, H.M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Coelho, A.A. TOPAS-Academic; Version 4.1; Coehlo Software: Brisbane, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Clark, S.J.; Segall, M.D.; Pickard, C.J.; Hasnip, P.J.; Probert, M.J.; Refson, K.; Payne, M.C. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. 2005, 220, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Björkman, T. CIF2Cell: Generating geometries for electronic structure programs. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011, 182, 1183–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.P. Special points for Brillouinzone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van De Streek, J.; Neumann, M.A. Validation of molecular crystal structures from powder diffraction data with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D). Acta Crystallogr. 2014, B70, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pickard, C.J.; Mauri, F. All-electron magnetic response with pseudopotentials: NMR chemical shifts. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 21, 245101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yates, J.R.; Pickard, C.J.; Mauri, F. Calculation of NMR chemical shifts for extended systems using ultrasoft pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 0201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hasa, D.; Pastore, M.; Arhangelskis, M.; Gabriele, B.; Cruz-Cabeza, A.J.; Rauber, G.S.; Bond, A.D.; Jones, W. On the kinetics of solvate formation through mechanochemistry. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 2097–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tian, F.; Qu, H.; Zimmermann, A.; Munk, T.; Jørgensen, A.C.; Rantanen, J. Factors affecting crystallization of hydrates. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 62, 1534–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hartman, J.D.; Kudla, R.A.; Day, G.M.; Mueller, L.J.; Beran, G.J.O. Benchmark fragment-based 1H, 13C, 15N and 17O chemical shift predictions in molecular crystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 21686–21709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mayoka, G.; Keiser, J.; Haeberli, G.; Chibale, K. Structure-activity relationship and in vitro ADMET studies of N-aryl 3-Trifluoromethyl Pyrido [1,2-A] benzimidazoles that are efficacious in a mouse model of schistosomiasis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, 406–417. [Google Scholar]
  49. Linberg, K.; Zafar, N.A.; Etter, M.; Michalchuk, A.A.L.; Rademann, K.; Emmerling, F. A Comparative Study of the Ionic Cocrystals NaX (α-d-Glucose)2 (X = Cl, Br, I). Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 4293–4299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kulla, H.; Haferkamp, S.; Akhmetova, I.; Röllig, M.; Maierhofer, C.; Rademann, K.; Emmerling, F. In situ investigations of mechanochemical one-pot syntheses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5930–5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Uzarevic, K.; Halasz, I.; Friščić, T. Real-time and in situ monitoring of mechanochemical reactions: A new playground for all chemists. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4129–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Karki, S.; Friščić, T.; Jones, W.; Motherwell, W.D.S. Screening for pharmaceutical cocrystal hydrates via neat and liquid-assisted grinding. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hasa, D.; Jones, W. Screening for new pharmaceutical solid forms using mechanochemistry: A practical guide. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 117, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ostwald, W. Studien über die Bildung und Umwandlung fester Körper. Z. Phys. 1897, 22, 289–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Belenguer, A.M.; Lampronti, G.I.; Cruz-Cabeza, A.J.; Hunter, C.A.; Sanders, J.K. Solvation and surface effects on polymorph stabilities at the nanoscale. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6617–6627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Trask, A.V.; Shan, N.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Jones, W.; Feng, S.; Tan, R.B.H.; Carpenter, K.J. Selective polymorph transformation via solvent-drop grinding. Chem. Commun. 2005, 7, 880–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Allen, P.V.; Rahn, P.D.; Sarapu, A.C.; Vanderwielens, A.J. Physical characterization of erythromycin: Anhydrate, monohydrate, and dihydrate crystalline solids. J. Pharm. Sci. 1978, 67, 1087–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kawashima, Y.; Niwa, T.; Takeuchi, H.; Hino, T.; Itoh, Y.; Furuyama, S. Characterization of polymorphs of tranilast anhydrate and tranilast monohydrate when crystallized by two solvent change spherical crystallization techniques. J. Pharm. Sci. 1991, 80, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of PZQ ((11bRS)-2-(Cyclohexylcarbonyl)-1,2,3,6,7,11b-hexahydro-4-H-pyrazino[2,1-a]isoquinolin-4-one) with atom numbering.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of PZQ ((11bRS)-2-(Cyclohexylcarbonyl)-1,2,3,6,7,11b-hexahydro-4-H-pyrazino[2,1-a]isoquinolin-4-one) with atom numbering.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g001
Figure 2. PXRD pattern of (a) Form B, (b) Form A, (c) Form C, (d) the calculated pattern from CSD of the enantiomeric hemihydrate SIGBUG and (e) the new racemic hemihydrate.
Figure 2. PXRD pattern of (a) Form B, (b) Form A, (c) Form C, (d) the calculated pattern from CSD of the enantiomeric hemihydrate SIGBUG and (e) the new racemic hemihydrate.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g002
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of (a) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process starting from Form B, (b) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process by seeding procedure (with 10% wt preformed PZQ-HH) starting from Form A and (c) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process by seeding procedure (with 5% wt preformed PZQ-HH) starting from Form A.
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of (a) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process starting from Form B, (b) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process by seeding procedure (with 10% wt preformed PZQ-HH) starting from Form A and (c) PZQ-HH obtained in a one-step process by seeding procedure (with 5% wt preformed PZQ-HH) starting from Form A.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g003
Figure 4. Packing and hydrogen bonds motifs between PZQ and water molecules in (a) the enantiomeric hemihydrate SIGBUG [15] and (b) in the new racemic hemihydrated form.
Figure 4. Packing and hydrogen bonds motifs between PZQ and water molecules in (a) the enantiomeric hemihydrate SIGBUG [15] and (b) in the new racemic hemihydrated form.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g004
Figure 5. Rietveld refinement fit of the experimental pattern (red) and the calculated one (blue). In grey are the corresponding residuals.
Figure 5. Rietveld refinement fit of the experimental pattern (red) and the calculated one (blue). In grey are the corresponding residuals.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g005
Figure 6. DSC-TGA traces of PZQ-HH (solid lines refer to DSC curve).
Figure 6. DSC-TGA traces of PZQ-HH (solid lines refer to DSC curve).
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g006
Figure 7. 13C (150.9 MHz) CPMAS spectrum of PZQ-HH (d) recorded at 20 kHz with principal group assignments in comparison with previously reported spectra of commercial PZQ (a) Form B (b), and Form C (c).
Figure 7. 13C (150.9 MHz) CPMAS spectrum of PZQ-HH (d) recorded at 20 kHz with principal group assignments in comparison with previously reported spectra of commercial PZQ (a) Form B (b), and Form C (c).
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g007
Figure 8. FT–IR spectra of (top) PZQ-HH, (middle) Form B and (bottom) Form A. Main differences in comparison to the anhydrous forms are indicated in the frames.
Figure 8. FT–IR spectra of (top) PZQ-HH, (middle) Form B and (bottom) Form A. Main differences in comparison to the anhydrous forms are indicated in the frames.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g008
Figure 9. SEM images of PZQ-HH powder at different magnifications (90×, 1100×, 2200× and 3700×).
Figure 9. SEM images of PZQ-HH powder at different magnifications (90×, 1100×, 2200× and 3700×).
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g009
Figure 10. Intrinsic dissolution rate profiles in water at 37 °C for PZQ-HH, Form B and Form A.
Figure 10. Intrinsic dissolution rate profiles in water at 37 °C for PZQ-HH, Form B and Form A.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g010
Figure 11. PZQ-HH progressive transformation to Form B at room temperature (from top to bottom): (a) fresh sample, (b) after 4 months, (c) after 12 months, (d) Form B, and (e) PZQ-HH ground for 30 min at 25 Hz.
Figure 11. PZQ-HH progressive transformation to Form B at room temperature (from top to bottom): (a) fresh sample, (b) after 4 months, (c) after 12 months, (d) Form B, and (e) PZQ-HH ground for 30 min at 25 Hz.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g011
Figure 12. PXRD patterns (left) and magnified microscopy images (right) of PZQ-HH heated overnight at 50 °C/35 mmHg (top), and Form B (bottom).
Figure 12. PXRD patterns (left) and magnified microscopy images (right) of PZQ-HH heated overnight at 50 °C/35 mmHg (top), and Form B (bottom).
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g012
Figure 13. Overlay of the PZQ-HH structure (blue) and PZQ Form B (red) showing a cluster of five matching PZQ molecules. Hydrogen atoms and positions of water molecules in the PZQ-HH structure were omitted for clarity.
Figure 13. Overlay of the PZQ-HH structure (blue) and PZQ Form B (red) showing a cluster of five matching PZQ molecules. Hydrogen atoms and positions of water molecules in the PZQ-HH structure were omitted for clarity.
Pharmaceutics 12 00289 g013
Table 1. Nature of Praziquantel polymorphs obtained by different processes.
Table 1. Nature of Praziquantel polymorphs obtained by different processes.
Initial PolymorphMethod/TechniqueConditions/DurationOutcome
ALAG with water 1Two-step 2HH
ALAG with waterOne-stepA
BLAG with waterOne-stepHH
ASlurry 7 daysA
BSlurry 3 days 3HH
ALAG with waterOne-stepHH
with seeds of PZQ-HH
HHRT 4 monthsB
HH50 °C/under vacuumOvernight B
HHMilling (25 Hz)60 minB
HH25 °C–60 °CDynamic heatingB
1 The amount of water does not affect the final solid form. 2 In neat conditions for 30 min at 25 Hz, then, after addition of water, 1 h at 25 Hz. 3 Slurry experiments were conducted over seven days, periodically checking the solid; starting from day three the outcome was PZQ-HH.
Table 2. Experimental and calculated chemical shift for 13C SS-NMR analyses of PZQ-HH, compared to Form A, Form B and Form C, from refs. [19,20]. Atoms numbering refers to Figure 1.
Table 2. Experimental and calculated chemical shift for 13C SS-NMR analyses of PZQ-HH, compared to Form A, Form B and Form C, from refs. [19,20]. Atoms numbering refers to Figure 1.
AtomGroupForm AForm BForm CPZQ-HH
ExpExpExpExpCalc 1
7′C=O175.4, 176.2 sh173.6173.3173.6173.8
4C=O165.8, 164.6, 162.1164.3163.4165.4165.4
7aCq137.7, 136.5134.6135.1134.1136.3
11aCq135.8, 134.6134.6134.0134.1136.2
8CH129.7, 127.5, 124.8129.8129.1127.3129.4
11CH133.7, 132.0, 130.5127.5127.5127.3129.9
10CH 126.9127.1127.3128.4
9CH 125.8127.1124.0124.7
11bCH56.3, 55.555.555.554.955.1
6’CH232.0, 30.1, 27.9, 26.3, 25.329.427.425.824.5
1 see Section 2.2.12 Modelling of Solid-state NMR spectra.
Back to TopTop